An emergency shutdown of a power unit occurred at a nuclear power plant in Finland

58

There are reports from Finland about an emergency situation at a nuclear power plant. We are talking about the incident at the Olkiluoto nuclear power plant, located on the shores of the Baltic Sea.

According to the latest information, one of the power units at the Finnish nuclear power plant was shut down. At the station today there are two types of electronic weapons: BWR and PWR. The company, which owns the nuclear facility, reports that now the station is "taking all the necessary actions to clarify the circumstances of the unit's emergency shutdown and taking technical measures."



According to the latest data, the second power unit of the nuclear power plant, which was put into operation in 1980, was turned off. Its capacity is about 710 MW.

The license for the operation of the 1st and 2nd power units of the Olkiluoto NPP is valid until 2038.

According to the latest data, the emergency situation at a nuclear power plant in a country neighboring Russia did not cause environmental problems. The personnel at the power units continue to work. At the same time, as reported, the station recorded a "slight" increase in the level of radiation. What in this case means the term "some" (how much it is in system units) is not reported.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    10 December 2020 18: 34
    Vaunted Western technologies, why wassat although it may become sadly with us ...
    1. +2
      10 December 2020 20: 03
      and throw it in the west / east - without this in any way Andrey?
      https://1prime.ru/News/20190718/830169084.html
      emergency shutdowns happen everywhere, where there are reactors ..
      1. +15
        10 December 2020 20: 27
        Yes, it is clear that it happens everywhere., But when we have something that happens, howling and screaming that everything is rotten, rusted and everything explodes .. That's the same coin and you have to pay them. !!
        1. +12
          10 December 2020 20: 44
          Quote: bondrostov
          Yes, it is clear that it happens everywhere., But when we have something that happens, howling and screaming that everything is rotten, rusted and everything explodes .. That's the same coin and you have to pay them. !!

          And why weren't the Finns bent over like tribals and forced to close the NPP as an unsafe facility?
          Or do we need to close all Russian developments ?!
          1. +10
            10 December 2020 21: 00
            Quote: Starover_Z
            And why weren't the Finns bent over like tribals and forced to close the NPP as an unsafe facility?

            So they now go to the Tribalts with their surplus energy and sell, clearing their energy market from "ideologically wrong" electricity. Yes
          2. +5
            11 December 2020 02: 42
            And why weren't the Finns bent over like tribals and forced to close the NPP as an unsafe facility?


            The EU is constantly trying to bend the Finns, but so far it is not very successful. The Finns, unlike the Balts, do not have euphoria from the EU, they look at things realistically.
          3. +3
            11 December 2020 07: 55
            Quote: Starover_Z
            Or do we need to close all Russian developments ?!

            And what, it is still not clear to someone that all these dances with a tambourine around the release of Russian energy projects to the West are a dumb policy? These are all elements of a hybrid war that Europe has been waging against Russia for a long time. Despite the fact that Western politicians, straining their own throats, do not bother looking for the slightest justification for their own screeching. There is simply a command to yell at any reason without explaining the reasons, solely for the purpose of denigrating Russia's actions and economic resistance. Everything is clear, since the time of Ivan the Terrible ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                      5. The comment was deleted.
                      6. The comment was deleted.
                      7. The comment was deleted.
                      8. The comment was deleted.
                      9. The comment was deleted.
      3. +5
        10 December 2020 22: 29
        Quote: 2 level advisor
        and throw it in the west / east - without this in any way Andrey?
        ....... emergency shutdowns happen everywhere, where there are reactors ..

        =========
        Normal is normal, but what a boil was in Finland after the emergency shutdown of the power unit at LNPP-2 a year ago! Although there was no leak there, and the radiation background was normal ...
        1. +1
          11 December 2020 14: 06
          You don't understand this is different) they have an environmentally friendly leak
          1. 0
            11 December 2020 15: 34
            Quote: sifgame
            You don't understand this is different) they have an environmentally friendly leak

            ========
            Yes Yes! I know! And they have radiation "environmentally friendly"and the leaks are in strict accordance with the EU environmental standards ......... lol drinks
        2. +1
          11 December 2020 14: 21
          Quote: venik
          Although there was no leak there, and the radiation background was normal ...

          Oh! After Chernobyl, the radiation background was also "normal" for a long time! Every time I read and hear about an accident at a nuclear power plant, I remember how we took the children out, at least somewhere. We come to one city, and we: "Are you crazy? Our background is higher than yours there! Where have the children been dragged?"
      4. 0
        11 December 2020 13: 31
        Quote: Level 2 Advisor

        emergency shutdowns happen everywhere, where there are reactors ..

        And even where there is just electricity)))

        Here the question is also in the meaning of words and terminology, maybe it will be better if you call it "Normal operation of protection systems". By the fact that when the word emergency ... the brain draws pictures as an explosion tears off the reactor lid and fantanizes radioactive material for 10 km))
  2. +8
    10 December 2020 18: 36
    The protection worked, that's already good .. It would have been much worse if the shutdown had not happened ... maybe they just caught the "goat" ..
    1. 0
      10 December 2020 22: 14
      Quote: Dikson
      The protection worked - it's already good

      "Incident", "emergency situation". There is no news about protection activation. "Emergency disconnected" can mean both other... As a minder I tell you.
      1. +2
        10 December 2020 23: 02
        I quite believe, as a minder, that you know how to turn off a diesel engine that has run into a run-of-the-mill ..)) But I still assume .. because Emergency shutdown of the reactor without triggering the protection - it hardly seems to me purely physically. The reactor is not a diesel engine ... you can't drown it out so easily ...
        1. 0
          10 December 2020 23: 33
          Yes, you're right - I'm not a reactor specialist. For me, a reactor is a boiler, and the boiler can shut down (without protection) for various reasons: stopping the supply of fuel or air (the most gentle option is simply stopping combustion and vaporization), or destruction of the boiler. I hope for the first option, or for the protection actuation, as you wrote. But - I repeat - there is nothing in the news [yet] about stopping the reactor by the protection. hi
          1. +1
            11 December 2020 07: 35
            The problem is that "cessation of combustion", in your terminology, in nuclear reactors can last for years.
  3. -2
    10 December 2020 18: 39
    If the increase is fixed, it means this is an accident, that somewhere has collapsed and the reactor does not work for a long time. I hope all measures for the removal of residual heat are made
    1. 0
      10 December 2020 18: 44
      Not necessarily what collapsed. Could have drained the liquid somewhere
    2. +2
      10 December 2020 19: 05
      Quote: Vol4ara
      If the increase is fixed, it means this is an accident, that somewhere has collapsed and the reactor does not work for a long time. I hope all measures for the removal of residual heat are made

      Coolant leak - possible. The trouble is unpleasant, but solvable. The reactor is intact, the turbine units are intact. The background will rise, fact. Mostly irreversible. The premises of the station will be "firing" ...
      1. -1
        10 December 2020 20: 55
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        Quote: Vol4ara
        If the increase is fixed, it means this is an accident, that somewhere has collapsed and the reactor does not work for a long time. I hope all measures for the removal of residual heat are made

        Coolant leak - possible. The trouble is unpleasant, but solvable. The reactor is intact, the turbine units are intact. The background will rise, fact. Mostly irreversible. The premises of the station will be "firing" ...

        There was something similar in the pine forest. We'll see
  4. +17
    10 December 2020 18: 52
    The Balts don't burst into tears.
    1. +7
      10 December 2020 19: 17
      Quote: ul_vitalii
      The Balts don't burst into tears.

      There is not enough strength, - everything is spent on the BelNPP. hi
    2. +4
      10 December 2020 20: 23
      Quote: ul_vitalii
      The Balts don't burst into tears.

      The signal from the owner will come, they will bark at once in three voices.
    3. +3
      10 December 2020 22: 05
      Vitalia, hello, hi completely lost crying , the Balts are waiting for a clear signal from the owner
    4. +13
      10 December 2020 22: 11
      Quote: ul_vitalii
      Balts do not burst into tears

      Inconvenient .. They threaten to dig a tunnel under the Baltic. Don't give up ...
  5. +25
    10 December 2020 18: 57
    It's time to make a noise! "Infection in the hemisphere !!!", "Troupes of local residents are drowned by barges in the Baltic!", "Airplanes, on the fly, melt the skin!" etc. wassat
    Urgently convene the UN Security Council with one question "Immediately stop and dismantle all Westinghouse reactors!" And damages worth hundreds of trillions of dollars, of course. wink

    It's time to mirror the answer ...
    PS Not excluding that tomorrow they will write about the "insignificant melt of the core" - 2020 is not over yet.
    1. +8
      10 December 2020 19: 05
      In time for them to pay with their coin !!
      1. +3
        11 December 2020 10: 09
        Quote: bondrostov
        In time for them to pay with their coin !!

        The bottom of the Baltic has not yet been cleared of chemical weapons from the Second World War, so now the former allies of Nazi Germany are trying to poison the Baltic Sea with nuclear waste.
  6. HAM
    +7
    10 December 2020 19: 05
    At Fukushima, there was also a "slight" increase in SD ....
    The Swedes and Norway have probably already gorged themselves with iodine, therefore they are silent ...
  7. 0
    10 December 2020 19: 14
    Quote: Dikson
    The protection worked, that's already good .. It would have been much worse if the shutdown had not happened ... maybe they just caught the "goat" ..

    ELECTRICITY was stolen.
  8. +5
    10 December 2020 20: 05
    The Balts expected trouble from the nuclear power plant, but from the wrong side.
  9. +2
    10 December 2020 20: 25
    Taloponians were screaming about the Belarusian nuclear power plant, well, get it, sign it.
    D.b (Lavrov).
  10. -12
    10 December 2020 21: 09
    Two reactors are definitely ours; 17-18 years have been modernized.
    1. +6
      10 December 2020 21: 38
      Where are "our reactors" there?
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%AD%D0%A1_%D0%9E%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE#%D0%98%D0%BD%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%85
    2. +4
      10 December 2020 21: 44
      You will specify, yours is whose?
  11. +1
    10 December 2020 21: 38
    Teollisuuden voima clarified that the emergency shutdown of the reactor was the result of an increase in the level of radiation inside the station. "The situation is stable, the station is safe," the message says.

    The company indicated that the “challenge now is to prepare the reactor for cold shutdown,” which in practice means cooling it down and maintaining it at normal temperature and normal pressure for a specified period.

    Well, yes, it's okay - the exercises, probably, with the cooling down of the reactor ... gee ...
  12. 0
    10 December 2020 21: 42
    and Belorusskaya can sell the lacking lipestricity to Russophobes ... and sanctions on FinNs for the environment ... + a company in the media about the danger of nuclear power plants built by Europeans by Americans ................... ..........................
  13. +1
    10 December 2020 21: 43
    Quote: tralflot1832
    Two reactors are definitely ours; 17-18 years have been modernized.

    The coming year of 2004 was the first and the last year when all the work on the project went on as usual. The contractual company between TVO and AREVA was completed, without haste and fuss, a site previously chosen by Finnish customers for the construction of the power unit was prepared. Yes, it is worth saying a few words about the customer, since TVO in Finland is not just an ordinary energy company. 43% of TVO shares are owned by the state, of which 27% are owned by the state-owned company Fortum. The remaining 57% of the shares are owned by Finnish heavy industry companies. TVO not only operated the Olkiluoto nuclear power plant, but also owned both Swedish-made boiling water reactors, which produced 16% of all electricity generated in Finland. laughing
  14. +2
    10 December 2020 21: 45
    Another amazing feature of the French-Finnish contract is the way in which the opportunities to contact subcontractors and with STUK were allocated. The supervising public authority could only contact the French-German consortium through TVO, and TVO had no right to contact subcontracting companies. Trifle? But this strange mediation led to a huge loss of time. The AREVA designers made the changes, transferred TVO, they transferred this STUK. STUK identified the shortcomings, passed on their wishes to TVO, they passed them on to AREVA. Long, dreary and devoid of the slightest sense. TVO sees that clearly defective equipment was delivered to the construction site, they contact AREVA, the French communicate with defective subcontractors ... Well, and so on. A trifle that over and over again led to a loss of time. Here's another quote from the same 2006 STUK report:

    “The constant use of excessive gaps between the welded edges during welding is a direct violation of the quality of work procedure and is absolutely unacceptable. Such situations would not be possible with a well-functioning quality control system. … The quality system applied by subcontractors and the supplier is insufficient. ”

    The supplier in this case was understood as a Franco-German consortium.
  15. +1
    10 December 2020 22: 02
    Quote: tralflot1832
    Two reactors are definitely ours; 17-18 years have been modernized.
    laughing laughing
    Two reactors are definitely "ours" laughing I didn’t know laughing In the summer of 2008, TVO made its organizational conclusions - the head and executive director of the NPP project were dismissed for insufficient competence. In the fall, there were rumors that the price would rise by another 500 million euros, and AREVA employees attributed this to higher prices for materials and an increase in salaries. As you can see, the French experienced a "rise in prices", like the Americans from Westinghouse, also at the time of the crisis, when prices for steel and concrete fell to the floor all over the world, when prices fell - for everyone and everywhere, except for AREVA in Olkiluoto ... laughing Have you hired Polish guest welders with ROSATOM too?
  16. +2
    10 December 2020 22: 06
    There are no our blocks on it. laughing
  17. +4
    10 December 2020 22: 11
    European democratic radiation is harmless to Europeans. the Japanese were also pedantic - only before the accident - after the accident, all the pedantry flew somewhere

    and it turned out to be ordinary gouges

    Chernobyl in the USSR was cleaned up in a year, but in Fukushima everything is in such a state as if it happened yesterday - although the accident is already 9 years old !!! - Well, where is the Japanese pedantry and accuracy?
  18. +2
    10 December 2020 22: 12
    junk .. put into operation in the mid-70s .. built by the Swedes .. who, apart from ABB and SAAB, did not create anything else ..  laughing For dates, such incidents have already happened "about 40 times" during the operation of this nuclear power plant, according to their own admissions,
    1. 0
      10 December 2020 23: 42
      As the solar plasma reached the core and caused rolling failures of the nuclear power plant systems, with subsequent heroic efforts of the personnel, the danger passed. The curtain. Not a bad excuse. I think there will be an official version in this repertoire.
  19. 0
    11 December 2020 08: 23
    Isn't it the same EB system as in Fukushima, eh?
    I have to google it.
    Wow, they have increased the capacity of power units by 35% for several modernizations.
  20. +2
    11 December 2020 08: 35
    Quote: 2 level advisor
    and throw it in the west / east - without this in any way Andrey?
    https://1prime.ru/News/20190718/830169084.html
    emergency shutdowns happen everywhere, where there are reactors ..

    In general, this is a jamb of this company, which admitted dozens of problems at nuclear power plants in France, that if London gets lost on the outskirts of a skiff, the EU loses the qualification level necessary to create reliable systems. Especially in Germany, it is noticeable from the best and most powerful reactors in the world to the mess with trances and black Arabs at nuclear facilities. In just 25 years! Lovers of camels and chopping off the heads of those accused of witchcraft, they also love to build ... Saudi Arabian nuclear workers who are trained by AREVA and the other side of the Saudis - Amina Bin Abdulhalim Nassar, executed on suspicion of witchcraft. puts himself on the same shelf of value with such CEREALS.


     

    ..
  21. +1
    11 December 2020 08: 41
    Quote: zwlad
    Isn't it the same EB system as in Fukushima, eh?
    I have to google it.
    Wow, they have increased the capacity of power units by 35% for several modernizations.

    Japanese police, in response to Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi's demands to conduct a "tough" investigation into JCO's activities, raided its Tokyo headquarters. The investigation already has the recognition of the company's management shedding light on the causes of the accident. Seven years ago, the plant adopted an internal instruction, which illegally, in violation of the rules for working with radioactive materials approved by state bodies, established a simplified technology for the manufacture of uranium fuel.

    Refusing automation, factory workers mixed uranium powder with nitric acid in ordinary stainless steel buckets using long-handled spoons and then manually, rather than using a pump, loaded the mixture into the tank of the production reactor. On September 30, they mistakenly poured eight times more uranium mixture into the reactor than expected, which led to an uncontrolled chain reaction. They managed to stop her by a miracle. The investigation also established that the workers who made the mistake knew practically nothing about the properties of uranium and did not have personal dosimeters.

    This was not the only breach of safety at the factory. According to eyewitnesses, the surveillance cameras located around the perimeter of the plant were always turned off. laughing
    1. 0
      11 December 2020 11: 35
      Quote: Gennady Fomkin

      Having abandoned automation, factory workers mixed uranium powder with nitric acid in ordinary stainless steel buckets using long-handled spoons, and then manually, rather than using a pump, loaded the mixture into the production reactor tank. On September 30, they mistakenly poured eight times more uranium mixture into the reactor than expected, which led to an uncontrolled chain reaction. They managed to stop her literally by a miracle. The investigation also found that the workers who made the mistake knew practically nothing about the properties of uranium.

      This is all true??! belay fool
      1. 0
        11 December 2020 18: 04
        Quote: Avis
        This is all true??!

        The same accident at the Tokaimura plant is a textbook case of what can happen in the case of simplification of technology when unskilled personnel are used at the enterprise.
        Quote: Avis
        On September 30, they mistakenly poured eight times more uranium mixture into the reactor than expected, which led to an uncontrolled chain reaction.
        .

        The volume was the same. But the initial material on September 30 was different - the enterprise started working with new raw materials, with a multiple degree of enrichment.
        With the use of standard automation, everything would have worked out - this was taken into account when developing the system. But with manual mixing, the workers simply did not understand what they were dealing with - and as usual they loaded the same volume into the reactor. Then they saw Cherenkov radiation - in a mixture of high concentration, the critical mass was exceeded, after which a chain reaction began.
  22. 0
    11 December 2020 12: 04
    Quote: Avis
    Quote: Gennady Fomkin

    Having abandoned automation, factory workers mixed uranium powder with nitric acid in ordinary stainless steel buckets using long-handled spoons, and then manually, rather than using a pump, loaded the mixture into the production reactor tank. On September 30, they mistakenly poured eight times more uranium mixture into the reactor than expected, which led to an uncontrolled chain reaction. They managed to stop her literally by a miracle. The investigation also found that the workers who made the mistake knew practically nothing about the properties of uranium.

    This is all true??! belay fool


    Newspaper "Kommersant" # 184 of 08.10.1999/XNUMX/XNUMX, An hour after the start of the search at the Tokyo headquarters of JCO, Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi, accompanied by the newly appointed head of the Agency for Science and Technology, Hirofumi Nakasone, departed from Tokyo to Tokaimura by helicopter. Visiting the ill-fated factory, the prime minister acknowledged the inadequacy of the government’s measures following the accident: "We could not imagine such an incident, and our system was inadequate."

    Obuchi promised to review the current laws regarding nuclear incidents, and, if necessary, amend them at the next session of parliament. Control over Japan's nuclear facilities will be tightened "so that the nation can feel safe again."

    JCO's fate is now being decided by the Science and Technology Agency. The issue of revoking her license is being considered, but the final decision will be made upon completion of the investigation. In addition, the authorities of Ibaraki Prefecture, which includes Tokaimura, intend to demand from JCO financial compensation, the amount of which is likely to lead the company to bankruptcy.

    Meanwhile, no one in Japan is in favor of closing the nuclear power plant. Now 51 nuclear reactors provide only one third of the country's energy needs, which are constantly growing. The construction of thermal or hydroelectric power plants in Japan is almost impossible due to the peculiarities of the Japanese landscape. Therefore, the Japanese nuclear program, which provides for the construction of another 2010 reactors by 20, will continue. A country that has mastered the technology of mixing nuclear fuel in a bucket to build storage of gaseous hydrogen is a trifle. laughing
    1. 0
      11 December 2020 18: 10
      Quote: Gennady Fomkin


      Newspaper "Kommersant" # 184 of 08.10.1999/XNUMX/XNUMX, An hour after the start of the search at the Tokyo headquarters of JCO, Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi, accompanied by the newly appointed head of the Agency for Science and Technology, Hirofumi Nakasone, departed from Tokyo to Tokaimura by helicopter. Visiting the ill-fated factory, the prime minister acknowledged the inadequacy of the government’s measures following the accident: "We could not imagine such an incident, and our system was inadequate."


      No, I knew, of course, that the japas are full of money. but to so... belay
  23. 0
    11 December 2020 12: 17
    Since the Poles are in business, there is no need to worry about the fate of the project. They will also connect the neighbors on the bottom right, to accelerate the movement into the bright hydrogen future, and at the same time they will overpower them. laughing
  24. 0
    11 December 2020 12: 28
    We often hear that the market is the backbone of modern society, but it is impossible to think with the spinal cord. Chernobyl and Fukushima prove that the atom and slovenliness are not "democratic" or "totalitarian". These people are no longer able to manage what they have created themselves.
  25. -1
    11 December 2020 14: 31
    ... At the station today there are two types of electronic weapons: BWR and PWR ...


    The author of the article must be precise. To date, only 2 blocks BWR... PWR is not running, and it is not known when it will be started.
  26. +1
    11 December 2020 16: 15
    Emergency shutdown is a common situation. Automation settings are paranoid. A little off. Why raise the noise. We need to get information on the merits.
    Here is a link from the industry site http://atominfo.ru/newsz02/a0718.htm. Judging by the article, the shutdown prevented further development of the incident. They will figure it out and run.
    1. 0
      11 December 2020 16: 29
      Here's another: http://atominfo.ru/newsz02/a0721.htm
  27. 0
    11 December 2020 18: 06
    And you might think if something like this happened at the NPP, then the media would have only one prada and nothing to the cream of truth? - All levels are measured at each meter with micro-roentgen accuracy ... Yeah, right now. The usual practice, routine expressions - everything is under control, we are working.
    And there is nothing dangerous in shutting down the unit, if it is not RBMK)))