Modular benefits. Features of the Boxer universal platform

40

Experienced Boxer armored personnel carrier configured for the British Army. UK Department of Defense Photo

Many modern projects of armored combat vehicles provide for the use of modular architecture. In this case, several samples of equipment for different purposes are created on a common base, differing only in target equipment and payload. The most interesting results of this kind were obtained in the European project of the ARTEC Boxer armored vehicle.

Two modules


The joint project between Germany, Great Britain and the Netherlands, later called Boxer, has been developed since the late nineties by several companies, using the experience of previous research programs. The goal of the new project was to create a universal platform and modules for it, from which a wide range of equipment for various purposes could be assembled.



Any armored vehicle of the Boxer family consists of two main components: Drive Module and Mission Module. The first is a wheeled platform with all the necessary components. It contains the engine compartment, control compartment, transmission and chassis, power supply and life support, etc. All main units are concentrated in the nose of the platform, inside the armored hull. Behind the latter there is a seat for the "mission module".


Undercarriage without payload, rear view. Photo Wikimedia Commons

The Mission Module is designed as a body with standard dimensions and mountings, installed on a platform. Quick-release fasteners and system connections are provided. If there is a crane or special jacks, the replacement of the target module takes about half an hour, and it is possible to use the same module or a unit for another purpose. This greatly simplifies both the repair and the change in the purpose of the armored vehicle.

Mission modules can be transported separately using a special frame. Such a unit, together with a module, fits into the dimensions of a standard container. Working with such a cargo does not require any specific funds, which simplifies logistics and supply.

Combat capabilities


At different stages of the Boxer project development, a large number of replaceable target modules for one purpose or another were proposed. Some of these proposals were implemented in metal and even brought to exploitation. Other payload options are still being tested, and several samples are still in the plans.


Mission Module for the construction of an armored vehicle, front-side view. An opening is provided on the frontal plate for communication with the control compartment on the chassis. Photo Wikimedia Commons

"Boxer" was developed as a modern transport for the infantry, and therefore its main load is the landing module. This product has a developed multi-layer protection against bullets / projectiles, shrapnel and mines. There are places for the commander, gunner and eight fighters. The crew and the troopers are located on energy-absorbing seats. Access to the module is provided by a stern ramp and upper hatches.

In the configuration of the armored personnel carrier, the Boxer vehicle must carry a remotely controlled weapon station. The type of this product is chosen by the customer. Serial armored personnel carriers for different countries receive DBMs of several models and carry machine guns and automatic grenade launchers. DBM with small-bore cannons are also offered.

There are modifications with more powerful weapons. So, for Lithuania BMP Vilkas is being built. It is equipped with a Rafael Samson Mk II turret with a 30mm cannon and Spike missiles. The AIF ordered a similar vehicle with a two-man turret fitted with a 30mm cannon and a pair of 7,62mm machine guns. After such modernization, the Lithuanian amphibious capabilities remain, but the number of seats may be reduced.


Experienced BMP Vilkas with missile and cannon armament. Photo by Rheinmetall Defense

Several options for an artillery armored vehicle based on a common chassis are offered at once. With minimal processing of the landing "mission module", it is possible to create a self-propelled mortar with a caliber of up to 120 mm. Experiments were carried out with installation on a standard module of the Oerlikon Skyranger air defense system. A turret with a 155-mm howitzer borrowed from the PzH 2000 is being developed. If there is interest from customers, it is possible to continue developing combat vehicles with unguided, anti-tank or anti-aircraft missile weapons.

Special equipment


In the corps, a command and staff module is being built in the airborne type. He receives several workstations, as well as a developed set of communication and control facilities. The exact composition of the electronics is determined by the needs of the customer. To date, two versions of such modules have been created - for Germany and the Netherlands.


Training machine for Lithuania - there are minimal differences from equipment for other countries. Photo Thinkdefence.co.uk

There is a sanitary module. It features an extra-high body and carries all the necessary equipment for first aid. The module can accommodate seven sedentary patients or three bedridden patients with an accompanying person. Loading is done through the stern; the ramp has been redesigned for more convenience for the orderlies and the wounded.

The recovery and recovery module is being tested. Side jacks and a feed opener are mounted on its body. A crane with a 5,3 m long boom and a lifting capacity of up to 20 tons is placed on the roof. Modules for engineering purposes are offered: protected vehicles for sappers and cargo up to 1 ton. A bridge layer has been developed, all of its special units are installed at the regular payload site.

A training module has been created to train driver-mechanics. It is equipped with a large wheelhouse with large glazing and all the necessary equipment. Inside there are places for the instructor and accompanying persons. The instructor can follow the road and the readings of the instruments, as well as take control.


Anti-aircraft gun with a Skyranger turret. Photo Wikimedia Commons

Modularity in service


By now, the full-scale serial production of Boxer armored vehicles has been mastered, and the customer countries are actively using their modular potential. Several variants of equipment for different purposes are being produced, new purchases of other machines are planned. Various kinds of modernization are also being carried out.

The starting customer for the Boxers was Germany, which wanted more than 400 units. equipment until 2020. As of the beginning of the year, there were more than 300 vehicles in service: over 120-130 armored personnel carriers, 72 ambulances, 65 command and staff vehicles and 10 training vehicles. Deliveries are ongoing and will be completed shortly. The possibility of purchasing artillery and missile systems based on a universal chassis is being considered.

In 2013-18. carried out a large order of the armed forces of the Netherlands. The bulk of this contract, 92 units, fell on engineering equipment. Subsequently, some of these machines were rebuilt into repair and recovery vehicles. Also ordered 52 ambulances and 36 command and staff. We acquired a small number of training and cargo options.


Boxer for the Australian Army. Australian Department of Defense Photo

Delivery of Boxer / Vilkas to the Lithuanian army started. Ordered 91 armored vehicles - 89 infantry fighting vehicles and two training. The handover of the last machines is scheduled for next year. The Lithuanian army is also showing interest in other modifications of the Boxer, but is unable to order them.

Last year, the first BMP samples were sent to Australia, made according to its requirements. 25 machines in two versions are used for initial development and gaining experience. Until 2026, the Australian army wants to receive 211 armored vehicles of several types: BMP, KShM, BREM, etc. The bulk of this equipment will be collected at a plant under construction in Australia.

In 2022, the delivery of equipment from the Boxer family of the British Army will begin. She will purchase 528 cars with an option for 900-1000 units. It is proposed to buy four variants of equipment, including armored personnel carriers and KShM. The production will be entrusted to a new British-German joint venture.


German interior of the Boxer command vehicle. View from the side of the ramp. Photo of the Ministry of Defense of Germany

Several countries, incl. outside Europe are showing interest in the Boxer family, but have not yet placed orders. So, in the recent past, Slovenia expressed a desire to buy such equipment. In 2018-19. it almost came to the signing of the contract, but the country's Ministry of Defense decided to conduct new research and revise the requirements. It was also reported about negotiations with Algeria. Already in 2020, he could start a licensed assembly, however news this kind has not yet been received.

Concept implementation


In general, the concept of building a universal platform equipped with target modules for different purposes is not something new or unique. However, it is the application of this concept that makes the international Boxer project interesting from a technical and operational point of view, and also attracts potential customers.

In this project, the idea of ​​modules is brought to its logical conclusion. The "running module" is made in the form of a machine with a large seat for the "mission module" and does not require rebuilding when replacing this unit. At the same time, several target modules for different purposes have been developed, and new ones should appear soon.


Equipping a sanitary modification. Photo Wikimedia Commons

It should be noted that out of all the variety of "mission modules" for Boxer, only a few products have gone into series so far - armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, KShM, ambulance, etc. The prospects for others, such as a bridgelayer or self-propelled guns, remain uncertain. Orders for such modules have not yet been received, and it is not known whether they will ever appear.

However, the lack of real interest in individual modules does not hinder the production and sales of others. In addition, the developers of Boxer, having created several different modules, are able to immediately offer the customer the entire range of such products. He will be able to select the desired samples and he will not need to order the development of new ones, which in itself is an important competitive advantage.

Thus, the joint European project of the Boxer armored vehicle does not just use a promising modular architecture. He implements it to the fullest extent and with maximum efficiency. Orders confirm the correctness of such decisions. More than 540 units have been manufactured for them. armored vehicles, and in the future at least 700-750 vehicles will be built. Such commercial successes generally confirm the correctness of the chosen design solutions.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    11 December 2020 04: 38
    The more modularity, the larger the dimensions. smile
    1. +7
      11 December 2020 10: 50
      Quote: Thomas N.
      The more modularity, the larger the dimensions. smile

      and worse weight return
      in the navy, this topic has already been ill
      1. +6
        11 December 2020 13: 24
        Quote: A1845
        in the navy, this topic has already been ill

        Well yes. Everything is beautiful on a piece of paper, but in fact - crap. Okay, let's not talk about weight and dimensions. But, damn it, is there any point in blocking modularity? If you need a KSHM, then a specialized KSHM will be differently cooler than a KSHM module. Likewise, with armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles and others (not to mention the fact that the requirements for infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers generally differ significantly). And these modules ... They also need to be stored somewhere while they lie dead weight... Is there any point in purchasing, say, 200 Boxers and 400 modules for them? 200 modules will be stupidly gathering dust in warehouses (and they are not cheap!). It’s better to immediately order the 200 required specialized machines. Let's say 20 KShM and 90 armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles. There will be much more sense, less spending. As for the alleged maintainability and all that - such a fool will almost always fly into the chassis module, i.e. to the base, chassis. And if the chassis is decommissioned, then the disproportion between the number of chassis and the modules previously purchased for them will only increase. Those. the costs are even more ineffective. Well, if you buy Boxers without spare modules, in a 1: 1 ratio, then the meaning of modularity is also unclear. As already mentioned, specialized equipment will still be better.

        PS And by the way ...
        Quote: A1845
        in the navy, this topic has already been ill
        We have not yet, alas. Quite coughing.
        1. +7
          11 December 2020 15: 21
          The customer chooses ONLY one of the module configurations offered to choose from! Ordered KSHM, get ONLY KSHM! No other configurations! But if the customer has several different Boxers in operation, then a big benefit for repairs!
          1. +1
            11 December 2020 16: 09
            Quote: vadim dok
            But if the customer has several different Boxers in operation, then a big benefit for repairs!

            Which one? And yes, clarify - in peacetime or in war?
            And you absolutely did not understand what I wrote above.
        2. +8
          11 December 2020 20: 28
          Quote: Kuroneko
          But, damn it, is there any point in blocking modularity? If you need a KSHM, then a specialized KSHM will be differently cooler than a KSHM module.

          The meaning appears when the question of logistics arises on the scale of the army.
          1. +5
            11 December 2020 20: 35
            Quote: Alexander Vorontsov
            The meaning appears when the question of logistics arises on the scale of the army.

            It is just on this scale and is not. Modularity is ALWAYS a completely unnecessary burden on logistics. A specialized KSHM will not require a carriage and a NON-small trolley of special equipment that will be needed, so you will need a KSHM module everywhere.

            Modularity on paper and in the idea itself sounds tempting, but it can only work for the VERY rich. And there are still no such balls on the Dirt ball. Even the United States, with its space military budget, for some reason is in no hurry to implement such modularity on its military equipment.
            1. +6
              11 December 2020 21: 30
              Quote: Kuroneko
              It is just on this scale and is not. Modularity is ALWAYS a completely unnecessary burden on logistics. A specialized KSHM will not require a carriage and a NON-small trolley of special equipment that will be needed, so you will need a KSHM module everywhere.

              It is not exclusively in your picture of the world - in the way you imagine logistics.

              Analytical reports, including the US Army, are behind modularity.
              Moreover, they analyzed both their own and Soviet experiences.

              When the Soviets entered Afghanistan, it turned out that all the equipment was poorly suited for a theater of operations.
              All.
              The guns don't go up that high.
              By your logic - we'd better release another 30 BMPs for Afghanistan, right?

              A simple example is patrolling and transporting personnel in the Caucasus in conditions of relative peace. No additional armor is needed, it reduces cross-country ability, fuel consumption increases, as does the wear of the chassis, CV joints and transmissions.
              A large-caliber expensive module is not needed, which means that you can limit yourself to a turret with a 7,62 machine gun.
              In Syria, on the contrary, large calibers and long-range battles are common. This means both the module and the armor are needed.
              So let's make 1 episodes instead of 2.
              And this is not yet touching upon the issues of modernization and repair - modular technology is better adapted to this.
              And no one carries modules for cars - all this is in the support units in the rear.

              Even the United States, with its space military budget, for some reason is in no hurry to implement such modularity on its military equipment.

              Your information is incorrect.
              They are already the third generation of tactical vehicles based on this principle ...
              Moreover, according to the experience of the previous two, they diverged so that they themselves are joking (but did not disperse from scratch)
  2. +11
    11 December 2020 05: 05
    This concept, with a module installed in the "trough", is probably interesting in terms of additional strengthening of mine protection.
  3. Owl
    +9
    11 December 2020 06: 17
    The modular principle is a big gain in maintainability. The speed of repair (re-equipment), by means of remrota, is less than an hour. This means that, according to the experience of the Great Patriotic War, the enemy's equipment must be burned, including, then the armored vehicles cannot be repaired.
    1. -2
      11 December 2020 06: 37
      Quote: Eagle Owl
      The modular principle is a big gain in maintainability. The speed of repair (re-equipment), by means of remrota, is less than an hour.

      Yes, a car of this size, if it goes to the battlefield, will need repairs very often! laughing
      1. +6
        11 December 2020 16: 12
        Quote: Thomas N.
        Yes, a car of this size


        Yes, the Germans had a huge armored shed - an excellent target on the battlefield. (Not like the Orthodox Boomerang, Kurganets and T-15!)

        1. +1
          4 February 2021 12: 00
          unlike a boxer, Kurganets and T-15s are completely differently protected.
          even the boomerang has more protection, although the modular approach of the Germans is also very useful. And Kurgan should be compared with the puma and the puma is much better, except that the price tag is frightening.
      2. +5
        12 December 2020 20: 28
        More about the size of the car. What does it look like?

        Here's to this:

        And this:

        in general he:
        Yes, just an ELEPHANT! laughing

        And for the Australian army, a very suitable machine - there is no one to fight with: one continent - one country. smile
        Boxer for the Australian Army. Australian Department of Defense Photo
        1. 0
          13 December 2020 17: 34
          - In terms of dimensions, the Boxer, made on the basis of Patrya, practically does not differ from Kurganets ...
          1. 0
            13 December 2020 17: 37
            Quote: saygon66
            - In terms of dimensions, the Boxer, made on the basis of Patrya, practically does not differ from Kurganets ...

            So what? "Kurganets" does not improve it. A common disadvantage for them.
            1. 0
              13 December 2020 17: 46
              - What's better?
              1. +2
                13 December 2020 18: 42
                Quote: saygon66
                - What's better?

                A compact vehicle for delivering infantry to the battlefield (armed only with a machine gun for self-defense), if on a wheeled chassis it is like the Buffalo armored personnel carrier, which you wrote about in 2013, but at a modern level, of course. Although for our conditions, and even more so for the battlefield, such a tracked one is more suitable, and not MRAP. And in the kit it is a separate fire support vehicle without landing, armed with an automatic cannon and anti-tank systems, and even smaller in comparison with an armored personnel carrier, with the possibility of remote control.
                1. +4
                  13 December 2020 22: 16
                  - As far as I know, BTR40 would fit these requirements from domestic ones ... Not without additions, of course ...
                  - A pair of Alvis Saracen - Saladin? Fenneck, AML ... But all these machines were considered obsolete and they are not producing anything similar now ... If only any commercial versions.
                  1. 0
                    14 December 2020 02: 45
                    I am referring to the two-car kit I mentioned in this comment:
                    https://topwar.ru/172603-dym-otechestva-kakoe-buduschee-ozhidaet-bumerang.html#comment-id-10557414
            2. +4
              14 December 2020 02: 32
              Quote: Thomas N.
              Quote: saygon66
              - In terms of dimensions, the Boxer, made on the basis of Patrya, practically does not differ from Kurganets ...

              So what? "Kurganets" does not improve it. A common disadvantage for them.

              Correction - I meant "Boomerang". For saygon66 I will not argue, but maybe he is also about "Boomerang".
        2. +1
          4 February 2021 11: 53
          australians are not doing well
          after all, a former prison-continent that destroyed the local population,
          And the boxer suits them because there are huge distances across the flat semi-desert.
          And in general, they have a lot in common in weapons with South Africa.
  4. bad
    +15
    11 December 2020 06: 40
    Well ... In the case of Boxer, apparently it really turned out to achieve the desired effect from "modularity". Respect to developers.
  5. +10
    11 December 2020 08: 17
    I have an option with an LCD panel and a bed.
  6. -1
    11 December 2020 09: 44
    By now, the full-scale serial production of Boxer armored vehicles has been mastered, and the customer countries are actively using their modular potential.
    When detonated, this cuttlefish will scatter into all of its modules! bully
    1. -1
      11 December 2020 16: 13
      Quote: aszzz888
      When detonated, this cuttlefish will scatter into all of its modules!

      And what happens when the Boomerang, Kurganets and T-15 are blown up?
  7. +8
    11 December 2020 13: 01
    I would like to draw your attention to the fact that a lot of efforts are made to ensure that the equipment fits into a standard shipping container. The Americans drank from the logistics across the ocean and drew conclusions. Our situation is different, but even for the operational transfer of equipment by land, a standard container provides huge advantages.

    Well, and the already mentioned maintainability and the ability to configure for the task. In peacetime, there are many training vehicles, which in half an hour can be converted into infantry fighting vehicles or ambulances. Conveniently.
    1. +5
      11 December 2020 13: 33
      Quote: Proctologist
      In peacetime, there are many training vehicles, which in half an hour can be converted into infantry fighting vehicles or ambulances. Conveniently.

      It is precisely that this is a military equipment for purely peacetime service. Above, I have explained why.
      In fact, the correct approach to development is not in modularity as such, but in the unification of the main units and details. That, for example, was laid down in the concept of the Armata platform.
      1. +14
        11 December 2020 15: 00
        Quote: Kuroneko
        In fact, the correct approach to development is not in modularity as such, but in unification in terms of basic units and details.

        I agree, the potential sales market indicates this
  8. +7
    11 December 2020 13: 12
    A very interesting development, probably from the point of view of crew mine protection and protection against small-caliber guns .. Interestingly, are they already developing promising protection against 57mm guns?
    1. +7
      11 December 2020 23: 32
      Interestingly, they are already developing promising protection against 57mm guns?

      When they are massively used, then they will begin to develop, but now it makes no sense
      1. +5
        12 December 2020 11: 09
        Massively? The probable enemy for Europe is Russia! And Derivation?
        1. +5
          12 December 2020 19: 27
          Quote: AlexFly
          Massively? The probable enemy for Europe is Russia! And Derivation?

          "Derivation" is an anti-aircraft artillery system. Why does Boxer need protection from ZAK? Another thing is the BMP T-15 with a 57-mm cannon.
          1. +6
            13 December 2020 16: 19
            Aya thought, why not use an anti-aircraft gun for ground targets or is it bad manners?
            1. +6
              13 December 2020 18: 17
              Quote: AlexFly
              Aya thought, why not use an anti-aircraft gun for ground targets or is it bad manners?

              ZAK "Derivation" is not a German 88-mm FlaK 18/36/37 and similar anti-aircraft guns of the Second World War in the sense that it does not have an advantage in effective firing range at ground targets over possible opponents (BMP, ATGM), i.e. ... cannot shoot them from a safe range for themselves, as an anti-aircraft gun could destroy a tank in World War II. This means that in order to hit ground targets, "Derivation" will have to stand in one formation with infantry fighting vehicles and tanks, having neither proper armor protection, nor advantages in firepower, even in comparison with BMPs with the same cannon. So what's the point of exposing it to enemy fire? "Derivation" must protect its own from helicopters and UAVs, being behind the battle formation and away from ground targets.
        2. -1
          18 January 2021 00: 05
          Why do you think so ?
          It's easier to strangle us than to choke with us.
  9. +1
    4 February 2021 11: 51
    all is well, but what a huge boxer!
  10. 0
    18 February 2021 22: 26
    Maybe modularity is good for dividing production between project participants. Those. it is possible not only the division for the production of components but also the final assembly. In addition, if desired, everyone can make their own combat module with some sort of small but specific national characteristics. Those. nobody wanted to give the final assembly to just one country.

    If production were in one country with assembly in one plant, most likely this modularity has more disadvantages.
    You can make the final assembly of the car with various modifications.
  11. -1
    26 February 2021 02: 29
    Doubtful concept. Unification is better than modularity. Just change the turret to the BMP, for example. Or that the engine parts are interchangeable. But not so that would change the entire module. It's the same with modular engines, it's smooth on paper, but how is it in the field? From a tight layout, from any minor breakdown to change the engine block?
  12. 0
    4 October 2022 04: 00
    That's exactly how GTK Boxer needed to be made our Boomerang platform, modular and universal.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"