Military Review

NHK: It looks like Putin, by revising the constitutional amendments on border demarcation, left room for negotiations with Japan

64

The Japanese information service NHK has published an article describing the introduction in the Russian Federation of criminal liability for persons who, to one degree or another, challenge the territorial integrity of Russia. In particular, the Japanese media indicates that Russia may face imprisonment for calls for the alienation of certain territories.


For obvious reasons, the Kuril Islands are of the greatest interest to the Japanese media in this regard. The group of southern islands of the archipelago in Tokyo continues to be called the "northern territories". At the same time, the issue of signing a peace treaty with Russia with an attempt to link this signing with the "transfer of the islands" in Japan has recently intensified significantly.

Also, the Japanese press is focusing on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which, it would seem, should have put a fat point in someone's claims to Russian lands. In Japan, they think differently.

The aforementioned NHK information service writes literally the following:

In the new edition of the Basic Law of Russia, the border demarcation act is excluded from the list of prohibited actions. It seems that President Putin with this version of the amendments left room for negotiations with Japan on a peace treaty.

At the same time, NHK points out that after the amendments were made to the Constitution, the number of Russians who “are not inclined to hand over the islands to Japan” has increased.

NHK:

At the same time, Russia began to more actively deploy its military equipment on the archipelago.

Recall that earlier a delegation of heads of prefectures arrived at the new Japanese prime minister, who called on Yoshihide Suga "to intensify negotiations with Putin on the signing of a peace treaty." The prime minister said that he had already spoken with the Russian president and added that "in the conversation he declared his readiness to go all the way on this issue."
Photos used:
website of the President of the Russian Federation
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 10 December 2020 09: 48
    +16
    The Japanese should be clearly explained so that they don't even dream of returning the "northern territories."
    1. krot
      krot 10 December 2020 09: 52
      +26
      that after the introduction of amendments to the Constitution, the number of Russians who "are not inclined to hand over the islands to Japan" has increased

      I think the Russians, as they were opponents of the recoil of the Kuriles, remained, with the exception of some marginals. And the increase or decrease in their statistics has nothing to do with reality.
      1. Xnumx vis
        Xnumx vis 10 December 2020 13: 05
        +1
        "It looks like Putin, by the wording of the constitutional amendments on border demarcation, left room for negotiations with Japan" - Wishful thinking! And the marginals themselves will soon rest. Vaccination against coronavirus declared voluntary! And how wassat these wassat consider everything Russian bad, let them not be vaccinated!
    2. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 10 December 2020 09: 55
      +11
      Quote: Alexey-74
      The Japanese need to clearly explain

      Easy to understand, is it on the sopatka? laughing
      1. Krasnoyarsk
        Krasnoyarsk 10 December 2020 10: 39
        +5
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Easy to understand, is it on the sopatka?

        Well Duc, if they ask well, then where to go?
        But, by the way, I don't like the fad on demarcation either. Under this fad, those in power who want to bring can be.
        1. Lipchanin
          Lipchanin 10 December 2020 10: 46
          0
          Quote: Krasnoyarsk
          Under this fad, those in power who want to bring can be.

          They can. But the Kurils will not be given back. This means closing the exit to the Pacific Ocean.
          And it's not just that weapons are being taken there
          1. Krasnoyarsk
            Krasnoyarsk 10 December 2020 10: 51
            +3
            Quote: Lipchanin
            But the Kurils will not be given back.

            I hope so.
            But then this fad is like a carrot for the Japanese to continue negotiations on a peace treaty. And if, nevertheless, the agreement is signed without giving up the islands, then it will be aerobatics of our Foreign Ministry
            1. Lipchanin
              Lipchanin 10 December 2020 10: 53
              +2
              Quote: Krasnoyarsk
              And if, nevertheless, the agreement is signed without giving up the islands, then it will be aerobatics of our Foreign Ministry

              And it may be so, only Japans will not go to the conclusion of the contract.
              They will not be allowed to abandon the image of the enemy in the person of Russia.
              1. Stas157
                Stas157 10 December 2020 11: 36
                +15
                I am amazed at the number of articles and exclamations in Russian society that we will never give up the islands to the Japanese. Why discuss it when there is such an unshakable certainty? Otherwise, according to the law of the classical genre, everything happens the other way around - what happens is what they are shouting about that this will not happen.

                Citizens, you even adopted the amendments, as I was convinced here, for this purpose! What, again, the issue has not been resolved?
          2. Alexander Suvorov
            Alexander Suvorov 10 December 2020 11: 13
            +23
            Lipchanin (Sergey)
            They can. But the Kurils will not be given back.
            Oh, is it ?! Your words to God in the ears! Most likely, Putin himself will not give up the island, because this will be the last nail in the lid of the coffin, BUT ... Here is the guarantee that after Putin there will not be a new drunk, labeled, onvamnedimon or some other national traitor like Yakovlev or Shevardnadze? And these abominations, taking advantage of the loophole in the amendments to the constitution, for which they here so fought, will give up a half of Sakhalin in addition to the Kuriles for a sweet soul? Agree, the question is purely rhetorical.
            So it was necessary to put a full point for a long time, NO NEGOTIATIONS ON OWNERSHIP THERE WILL BE SMOKED RUSSIA, OUR ISLANDS AND DOT! If the Japs need a peace treaty (although who the hell did he go without islands), then let them sign it. In general, all this boisterous thing began because of the beast of the damned Judas, so that he could burn forever in Hell.
            1. Andr_38
              Andr_38 10 December 2020 12: 00
              -6
              Quote: Alexander Suvorov
              In general, all this boisterous began because of the beast of the damned Judas, so that he could burn forever in Hell.

              Someone about what, and the Stalinists about "Khrushch". laughing
            2. Lipchanin
              Lipchanin 10 December 2020 12: 02
              -2
              Quote: Alexander Suvorov
              ... That’s where the guarantee is that after Putin there will be no new drunk, labeled, onvamnedimon or some other national traitor like Yakovlev or Shevardnadze?

              Actually, I'm talking about the current situation.
              What will happen after GDP only God knows.
              But if anyone gives up the Kuriles, he will provoke a coup
          3. RUSS
            RUSS 10 December 2020 13: 16
            -3
            Quote: Lipchanin
            They can. But the Kuril Islands will not give up

            All not, but Habomai is quite
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 10 December 2020 12: 00
        +9
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Easy to understand, is it on the sopatka?

        For the Kuril Islands in the comments, I got a bunch of cons. But this was probably not enough for me, I will get more. And I will expose my arguments, for which, by the way, no one got "on the sopatka":In 1990, the USA gave 46,3 thousand square kilometers of the Bering Sea, in 2008 they gave China the island of Tarabarov and part of the island of Bolshoi Ussuriysky on the Amur, in 2011 they donated 90 thousand square kilometers of the Barents Sea to Norway
        1. Lipchanin
          Lipchanin 10 December 2020 12: 07
          -7
          Quote: tihonmarine
          In 1990, the USA gave 46,3 thousand square kilometers of the Bering Sea, in 2008 they gave China the island of Tarabarov and part of the island of Bolshoi Ussuriysky on the Amur, in 2011 they donated 90 thousand square kilometers of the Barents Sea to Norway

          And that's all for it?
          Sorry, but at IN already MANY times we have clearly explained how much and what we got in return.
          I do not want to dig and look for this.
          Take my word for it, Russia did not give it all for so
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 10 December 2020 12: 34
            +4
            Quote: Lipchanin
            Take my word for it, Russia did not give it all for so

            I also don’t want to dig, but I think everything was given away, as always, for free, just as Soviet Russia was given free of charge after the formation of the USSR, to various "union republics." And what did you get in return?
      3. cat Rusich
        cat Rusich 10 December 2020 20: 15
        0
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Quote: Alexey-74
        The Japanese need to clearly explain

        Easy to understand, is it on the sopatka? laughing
        For a start - stop buying "Japanese goods" - stop buying ordinary buyers.
    3. the most important
      the most important 10 December 2020 10: 36
      +5
      Quote: Alexey-74
      The Japanese should be clearly explained so that they don't even dream of returning the "northern territories."

      I support! But, the same must be explained to those who, due to their personal interests, see the opportunity to transfer the islands under the guise of "border demarcation". Something is alarming for Russia ... Considering. that according to the "new" Constitution, pensions should be indexed without any reservations to everyone, but in fact their working pensioners are not indexed and are not going to do this, then the conclusion easily suggests itself that the bargaining on the islands is also not over yet, to my deep regret .. ...
      1. New Year day
        New Year day 10 December 2020 10: 51
        +3
        Quote: the most important
        according to the "new" Constitution, pensions should be indexed without any reservations to everyone, but in fact their working pensioners are not indexed and are not going to do so

        so it is understandable that the constitution is for the elite, and for the rest - the criminal code
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 10 December 2020 12: 36
          +3
          Quote: Silvestr
          so it is understandable that the constitution is for the elite, and for the rest - the criminal code

          As it should be in a capitalist state.
    4. Civil
      Civil 10 December 2020 10: 46
      -1
      Here it is happiness - to patriotically express to Japan, and so everyone understands - no)
    5. iouris
      iouris 10 December 2020 10: 56
      +2
      The Japanese will figure it out themselves. You explain to us why the revision of the constitutional amendments on border demarcation is needed, and why did the US recognize the citizens of the Russian Federation living on the islands as Mikado subjects?
      1. Lipchanin
        Lipchanin 10 December 2020 11: 10
        +1
        Quote: iouris
        and why did the United States recognize the citizens of the Russian Federation living on the islands as Mikado subjects?

        And because zaluzhnye climb the Veda and where you can annoy Russia
        1. iouris
          iouris 10 December 2020 19: 04
          +1
          Well, for that and the States, to salt everyone. RF exists for what? In order to make all kinds of experiments on it?
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 10 December 2020 12: 05
        +2
        Quote: iouris
        and why did the United States recognize the citizens of the Russian Federation living on the islands as Mikado subjects?

        It means that Russia needs to recognize all people inhabiting Alaska and Russian America as citizens of the Russian Federation. I can continue my thought further.
        1. iouris
          iouris 10 December 2020 19: 07
          +2
          Quote: tihonmarine
          I can continue my thought further.

          If you could turn the Russian Federation into a prosperous state with a population of 300 million by the power of your thoughts, then you wouldn't have a price. Alaska and Puerto Rico would have stood in line for inclusion in the squad for a long time ... Well, you admit, and then what?
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 10 December 2020 20: 08
            +1
            Quote: iouris
            Alaska and Puerto Rico would have stood in line for inclusion in the squad for a long time ... Well, you admit, and then what?

            Well, the States recognized all residents of the Kuriles as Japanese subjects, and then what?
    6. private person
      private person 10 December 2020 14: 04
      +3
      The Japanese should be clearly explained so that they don't even dream of returning the "northern territories."

      Don't be so categorical. VVP did everything, made an amendment to the Constitution on the non-involvement of the president after retirement. The Duma approved all this and now he can do whatever he wants to be responsible for nothing. An example of a bear marked how much it has benefited the "friends of Russia" and now lives without knowing the troubles in Germany.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 10 December 2020 09: 52
    +9
    "Sho, again!" bully... the Ipenites are stupidly impudently reminding them of any concessions that do not exist for them with regard to OUR islands.
    1. Raven 95
      Raven 95 10 December 2020 12: 31
      +8
      They are stupid! They hope everyone is peering into the distance.
      They explained everything to them in Russian.



  3. Mykhalych
    Mykhalych 10 December 2020 09: 57
    0
    O Great Russian Language, you will never be understood by all foreigners. "In the new edition of the Basic Law of Russia, the border demarcation act is excluded from the list of prohibited actions"- yes, let them interpret it as I want (Yu) t, want it or come up with how they want it. The peace treaty is just paper (sheet), and the Kuriles are Russian territory. And what At the same time, Russia began to more actively deploy its military equipment on the archipelago. proves one thing - their ears are from a donkey, not the Kuril ridge.
    1. BecmepH
      BecmepH 10 December 2020 10: 51
      +4
      Quote: Mykhalych
      O Great Russian Language, you will never be understood by all foreigners. "In the new edition of the Basic Law of Russia, the border demarcation act is excluded from the list of prohibited actions"- yes, let them interpret it as I want (Yu) t, want it or come up with how they want it. The peace treaty is just paper (sheet), and the Kuriles are Russian territory. And what At the same time, Russia began to more actively deploy its military equipment on the archipelago. proves one thing - their ears are from a donkey, not the Kuril ridge.

      I agree with you, BUT !!! The whole world does not care about our language and our laws. As they decide, so be it. And this is the worst thing. We are fined for mind-boggling sums in favor of the "pygmies" (Ukraine, Poland ...) and we silently endure humiliation ... If they found a loophole in the interpretation of the basic law, it scares me. Someone will give ... to cut off that a storm does not rise over the Kuril Islands? Me not. And this is very old ...
  4. Tusv
    Tusv 10 December 2020 10: 02
    +6
    Well, let's demarcate Hokkaido itself. Start negotiations
  5. Fungus
    Fungus 10 December 2020 10: 02
    0
    A hole from a donut to them, not the Kuril Islands.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Avior
    Avior 10 December 2020 10: 10
    +7
    in some ways the Japanese are right with this casuistry.
    The problem of islands can in principle be reduced to the problem of demarcation.
    After all, the Japanese are not protesting against the treaty on renouncing the Kuril Islands as such, their position is that 4 disputed islands were mistakenly included in the Kuril Islands.
    And the demarcation clause fits very well into the situation
    I can't imagine who would have thought of handing them over to the Japanese, even Putin with his authority, it’s simply unthinkable, but on the other hand, I grew up on the fact that Damansky is an island of Russian glory, which was defended from the Chinese by cutting them properly. It has entered folklore, cinema, everywhere. And on you, it turned out to be quite Chinese in the end ....: ((
    1. Roman070280
      Roman070280 10 December 2020 11: 03
      +3
      I can't imagine who would have thought of handing them over to the Japanese, even Putin with his authority, it's just unthinkable


      I don’t understand why it’s suddenly unthinkable ..
      The people for the taken away pensions, the spat upon the constitution, the ruble that has fallen at once - did not say a word .. And if some, unknown to anyone in the bulk of the island, are handed over to the Yapas - then all will come out to protest right?
      Mentioned in the news a couple of times - and the whole story ..
  8. DymOk_v_dYmke
    DymOk_v_dYmke 10 December 2020 10: 12
    +5
    The Japanese information service NHK has published an article describing the introduction in the Russian Federation of criminal liability for persons who, to one degree or another, challenge the territorial integrity of Russia.

    In combination with the lack of jurisdiction of the first person, the situation looks ambiguous.
    Putin recognized as inviolable ...

    http://www.apn-spb.ru/news/article32776.htm
    1. Roman070280
      Roman070280 10 December 2020 11: 03
      +3
      Putin recognized as inviolable ...

      Putin is recognized by Putin as inviolable ...
  9. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 10 December 2020 10: 16
    +5
    In Japan, they think differently.
    Count (dream) in Japan can be as much as necessary. But even some Russian liberals already understand that we are not going to give the Japanese anything. It is clear that the Japanese will exaggerate this topic even when they cannot bear to be openly sent away with their dreams.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 10 December 2020 10: 39
      +5
      (dream) in Japan, they can all
      1. Niel-le-Calais
        Niel-le-Calais 10 December 2020 11: 35
        +5
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        in Japan they can

        the problem is that it was the great USSR. And even after the war with such an army.
        RF is not the USSR for a long time.
  10. Ural resident
    Ural resident 10 December 2020 10: 36
    +2
    The issue of transferring the islands arose in the recent past, when our side announced that it was ready for discussion. The two islands were discussed and were internally ready to transfer without unnecessary noise in exchange for the withdrawal of the American base and the promise of Japan to "be friends" with the Russian Federation and be independent. Thus, from the point of view of our leadership, it would be possible to push aside the strategic threat from the east by surrendering two "insignificant" islands. If this were not so, it would have been publicly declared that the islands are part of Russia and will never be transferred to anyone. Only the greed of the Japanese prevented, their appetite was played out and they needed everything. But even now there is a flirtation and I would not be surprised if they are still given away, you can expect anything from our unpredictability and asymmetry. I don't care about the minuses of the jingoistic patriots, but unfortunately they are not the ones who decide. Now everyone thinks that this is impossible, that the people will not allow, everyone will take to the streets. But what if this is done in the shadow of some kind of geostrategic victory, for example, about the simultaneous turmoil in the Donbass with the annexation of the territory, etc.? As in the days of the Crimea? Someone would have opposed, apart from a single Strelkov picket?
  11. Max Lebedev
    Max Lebedev 10 December 2020 10: 51
    +18
    Many have previously noticed that the amendment "On demarcation" is written indistinctly, with the possibility of getting around it. Now the Japanese have seen it too.
    And this amendment should exclude "room for maneuver"
  12. Machnamh
    Machnamh 10 December 2020 11: 02
    0
    Russia does not need a peace treaty with Japan. They don't fight anyway. To Vladimir Vladimirovich, as a serious head of a serious state, this must be publicly announced to the world. What Russia needs is to populate these territories. How many people are there now? Twenty years ago, 25 thousand people published. On that territory, and it is rather big, 5 thousand square meters. km, we need significantly more residents. Only not visitors from Central Asia, but, for example, those from the LPNR. And the climate in the southern Kuril Islands is quite warm. This is not Taimyr or even Magadan. Corresponds to the climate of the Voronezh region. And the density in Voronezh is 45 people. for 1 km. sq. So in the southern Kuriles, at least 200 thousand Russians should live and work in sufficiently acceptable conditions so that there are no disaffected people. Then that clamor about the "northern territories" will come to naught. For comparison: the population of the Falkland Islands is 3 thousand. That does not prevent the London crown from citing the wishes of these 3 thousand people as the main argument for keeping them in its paws. on their referendums.
    1. Niel-le-Calais
      Niel-le-Calais 10 December 2020 11: 46
      +2
      Quote: Machnamh
      the same with LDNR

      yeah. Moderate continental with soft oceanic ... almost the same thing ..
      And the distance. To the other end of the world, from another continent.
      Without infrastructure, without city-forming, from urban areas to undeveloped island distances ..
      read about life on the islands .. it is still not known which is better. A gray zone or islands. From the first one you can go to the center of the Russian Federation or Ukraine. And from the islands ...
      They don't go there. Only from there.
      under the USSR, immigrants from Ukraine practiced. But they survived there mainly from Siberia and the Far East.
      Since the 1960s, the authorities have recruited technicians and workers, paying high wages and resorting to privileges unprecedented in comparison with other parts of the former Soviet Union, such as increased pensions and extended vacations. Using such methods, the authorities purposefully sent seafood processing specialists to these islands.

      reached almost 30 thousand population.
      After the collapse of the Soviet Union, seafood processing plants began to lack raw materials, workers stopped paying wages, prices rose, and the Russian population of the islands faced very serious difficulties. The strong earthquake that struck in October 1994 on the high seas off Shikotan Island and the tsunami destroyed the life of the island population to the core. A massive migration outflow of the population from the Kuril Islands began.
      At the end of the 1990s, qualitative changes took place in the dynamics of the population: the birth rate fell sharply, which naturally reduced the natural increase, and the mechanical increase became negative, i.e. exit exceeded entry. As a result, population growth has practically stopped. The total resident population of the Southern Kuriles in 2000 was 6.2 thousand people.
      They have the most stable income for civil servants. Because the state.
      1. Machnamh
        Machnamh 11 December 2020 20: 20
        0
        Quote: Niel-le-Calais
        Moderate continental with soft oceanic ... almost the same thing ..


        Sorry, I did not quite understand the climate. You want to say that in the Southern Kuriles, where the mild oceanic climate is warmer than in Voronezh with a moderate continental? Quite possible. On average, these islands are located 6 degrees south. The northern tip of the northernmost island, Iturupa, is located 100 km south of Odessa in latitude. And the southern tip of Kunashir and Habomai at the latitude of Sochi. The average is the latitude of Novorossiysk. Of course, Novorossiysk is much warmer than Voronezh. There is, of course, an amendment that there is the breath of the Gulf Stream, and there is the Far East .... Well, that's what it turns out to be. Probably in the Southern Kuriles it is still a little warmer than in Kursk and Voronezh. On average annual temperatures in Wikipedia appear approximately the same values. And the Kurilian tan is spoken much denser than the Crimean one. And it lasts longer.
  13. bar
    bar 10 December 2020 11: 08
    +2
    amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which, it would seem, were supposed to put a fat point in someone's claims to Russian lands. In Japan, they think differently.

    These brothers in reason are so strange that it is impossible for ordinary people to understand their logic. recourse
  14. Roman070280
    Roman070280 10 December 2020 11: 10
    +2
    In the new edition of the Basic Law of Russia, the border demarcation act is excluded from the list of prohibited actions.


    Ay-yay-yay .. who did it ??
  15. Alex66
    Alex66 10 December 2020 11: 16
    +6
    Yes, they will give these islands to the Japanese as soon as the price is agreed. In the same way, they promised not to raise the retirement age to us. And we will not be asked, we are not specialists (about the referendum on the retirement age, this is how the officials answered).
  16. Ge2an
    Ge2an 10 December 2020 11: 17
    +6
    Yes, I began to notice for a long time that Putin and all his power are not who they are trying to impersonate. In fact, he and all his power, quietly, all of Russia and will give up, to be torn apart. That is my impression. The villages have gone bankrupt. , they drove everyone to the cities, so as not to run all over Russia and not look. All at once and make them dependent.
  17. Sibguest
    Sibguest 10 December 2020 11: 29
    -1
    "It seems that President Putin with this revision of the amendments left room for negotiations with Japan on a peace treaty."
    Drink sake, feed the goldfish, pet .... the dog - and finally calm down.
    "Slowly crawl the snail.
    Vvkrh, on the Fuji slope "
  18. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 10 December 2020 11: 30
    +5
    Not, rather, it seems that in the Russian Federation they have finally forgotten how to adopt not muddy laws and amendments.
    1. Roman070280
      Roman070280 10 December 2020 11: 43
      0
      Hrasmeister, * swear word *
    2. Van 16
      Van 16 10 December 2020 11: 55
      0
      "not muddy laws and amendments"
      It's easier to catch fish in troubled waters.
      1. Knell wardenheart
        Knell wardenheart 10 December 2020 12: 08
        +1
        In Carthage, at one time, too, a fish was caught, caught, maneuvered, maneuvered .. it is worth remembering this. It ended-all-bad.
    3. Herman 4223
      Herman 4223 10 December 2020 15: 25
      0
      What is muddy there? There are laws on border demarcation in all countries of the world, and we also had them before the amendments. You will find the same thing with the Japanese, I'm sure.
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. Ros 56
    Ros 56 10 December 2020 12: 06
    -1
    The Japanese misunderstood that point, it is implied there - we will not object to the joining of those who wish to join Russia. bully
  21. Nitarius
    Nitarius 10 December 2020 12: 48
    -1
    it will be theirs .. but when Japan enters as a region of Russia))) laughing
  22. The Siberian barber
    The Siberian barber 10 December 2020 13: 39
    +1
    It looks like Putin has left room for negotiations with Japan by revising the constitutional amendments on border demarcation

    "..." I'll tell you frankly, Monsieur Pound, "whispered Valiadis,

    -- everything is good. Benes has already agreed to pan-Europe, but

    do you know under what condition?

    Pique vests gathered closer and pulled out chicken necks.

    - Provided that Chornomorsk will be declared free

    city. Benes is the head. After all, they need to sell to someone

    your agricultural implements? So we will buy. "
    " Golden calf"
  23. flicker
    flicker 10 December 2020 13: 54
    -1
    In the new edition of the Basic Law of Russia, the border demarcation act is excluded from the list of prohibited actions. It seems that President Putin with this version of the amendments left room for negotiations with Japan on a peace treaty.

    "Demarcation" is the designation of a border line on the LAND by means of special border markers.
    But at the beginning (as a rule) the border is delimited, i.e. drawing on the map.
    ---
    We do not have a land border with Japan (on which, hypothetically, it would be possible to move the line - and even then without going beyond the "delimitation"), which means that only the sea border can be "demarcated".
    Those. only the sea border between the Kuril Islands and Japan can be demarcated.
    ---
    Well, how do they imagine the return of the Kuriles under such conditions? laughing
  24. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 10 December 2020 14: 51
    -2
    "In the new edition of the Basic Law of Russia, the border demarcation act is excluded from the list of prohibited actions."

    Yapi cannot understand in any way that the border with them is not subject to demarcation, since it has been drawn, confirmed and approved? Russia has no disputed border sections with Japan. So let the dreamers of the seizure of Russian territories remain wet dreams in front of hara-kiri for the disgraced.
  25. Herman 4223
    Herman 4223 10 December 2020 15: 04
    +1
    Why cast a shadow over the wattle fence, And before in our laws on border demarcation there was nothing? Demarcation is the drawing of a border on the ground, in general terms, the type of border is determined by delimitation. And both of these designations have always been in the laws of the country, I think they are in the laws of any country and this does not mean that the country will squander its territory.
    Japan has a hundred percent written in the laws, what does it mean the Japanese are going to give us Hokkaido?
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. Bear040
    Bear040 12 December 2020 00: 11
    +1
    And this is his mistake. You will not get peace with its neighbors by draining the territories of the Russian Federation, especially if they are allies of the United States and countries that have fought against Russia many times. I'm not even talking about the fact that the drain of the territories of the Russian Federation to foreign states will not add stability within the Russian Federation, but will definitely and seriously decrease the popularity of Putin and the company.
  28. lopvlad
    lopvlad 12 December 2020 03: 41
    +1
    In the new edition of the Basic Law of Russia, the border demarcation act is excluded from the list of prohibited actions. It seems that President Putin with this version of the amendments left room for negotiations with Japan on a peace treaty.


    they did not think that there was no act of demarcation, not because Russia wants to give up the Kuril Islands, but so that there would be no obstacles to the annexation of new territories to Russia.