NI: The work on the aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov" is too extensive for the ship to simply be given five years to serve

The American media presented their version of the development of events with the repair and modernization of the only Russian aircraft carrier, Admiral Kuznetsov. If just a few weeks ago the aircraft-carrying cruiser of the Russian Navy was called "one of the most formidable warships" in Russia, now in the American media there are largely opposite judgments. And we are talking about the same edition.

The notorious Russian magazine The National Interest (NI) distinguished itself with its material, in which it announced the possible loss of combat capability of the Admiral Kuznetsov after repairs.

The author of the material declares that the repairs on the Russian aircraft-carrying cruiser are being delayed and "according to its results, the combat effectiveness may not be up to the mark." By what criteria such conclusions are made is not clear.

At the same time, in the American media, the author states that work on the aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov", "allowing the Russian the fleet to be part of the exclusive club of the world's fleets "are" excessively extensive for the ship to simply be allowed to serve within five years. " Previously, it was precisely the five-year period of stay in the Russian Navy that the responsible persons in Russia announced.

Recall that boilers are being replaced on the aircraft-carrying cruiser, the deck is being repaired after a crane falls on it when the floating dock is flooded, other blocks and assemblies are being repaired, as well as modernization for the use of the latest weapons.

Earlier it was announced that the aircraft-carrying cruiser will return to service after repair and modernization in 2022.

Comments

[Mavrikiy]

Upgrade, for 5 years of service?

Earlier, it was precisely the five-year period of stay in the Russian Navy that the responsible persons in Russia announced.

[Uncle lee]

just allowed to serve within five years

No thoughts, only speculation ...

[Aerodrome]

Is it worth paying attention to such articles?

[Civil]

Do this for at least 10 years.

[Profiler]

Quote: Mavrikiy

Upgrade, for 5 years of service?

Earlier, it was precisely the five-year period of stay in the Russian Navy that the responsible persons in Russia announced.

You are right, such funds and resources are not invested in a ship that has such a short service life - only five years.

Something not named "responsible persons" (and who are they?), Or blurted out

[Paul Siebert]

In general, National Interest has recently been paying a lot of attention to our aircraft carrier fleet.
Quite recently I read an article about the revival of a project like "Ulyanovsk".
the author calls such a project of a Russian aircraft carrier "a US nightmare."
Already seventy airplanes and helicopters will be able to carry on board! ..
And the "Nimitz" itself will be larger - as much as 1000 feet in length! ..
And then there's the "Kuznetsov" out of the dock.
For five years.
It's time for the mattress admirals to jump into the windows!
Russians are swimming!
In general - less projection and more work!
The aircraft carrier fleet in Russia needs not only to be revived, but to be created based on modern challenges and new strategies ...

[iouris]

We do not have an aircraft carrier fleet.

[Vladimir61]

Quote: iouris

We do not have an aircraft carrier fleet.

Yes ... But, more recently, we had practically no army!

[rotmistr60]

magazine The National Interest (NI) distinguished itself with material

With the magazine it is clear if in two articles it contradicts itself. They say that after listening to several opinions, you will understand that the truth is somewhere in between. So maybe you need to listen to our specialists who are engaged in ship repairs and weapons modernization?

[Finches]

Aff.tar, stop scribbling, run to San Diego UDC Bonhomme Richard, restore! And there is nothing to worry about Kuzya! In the Black Sea Fleet, the rescue ship Kommuna, produced in 1913, is still in service, so Kuzya will serve as long as necessary!

[rotmistr60]

Aff.tar, stop scribbling ...

Judging by the fact that you are responding to my comment, this is addressed to me. So maybe you should read not just add letters, but also catch the meaning of what you read?

[Finches]

Actually, not for you, but for the American correspondent ... But, apparently, you wanted to

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Finches

in San Diego UDC Bonhomme Richard, rebuild!

They will not restore it. The decision was made to put him on pins and needles, more it is cheaper.

[Mykhalych]

And again: " American media presented"... and some "Red line" presented that: In 2017, the only Russian aircraft carrier was delivered for repairs. It was originally planned to repair it by 2021 for 86 billion rubles. Over the years, the ship burned and sank. The damage from the fire alone amounted to 95 billion rubles. And the fleet will receive it no earlier than 2023. https://www.rline.tv/news/2020-05-25-vosstanovlenie-avianostsa-admiral-kuznetsov-otkladyvaetsya-na-gody/
From Interfax infa such: "The only Russian aircraft carrier, Admiral Kuznetsov, will return to the Russian Navy after repairs in 2022, work on the ship is in full swing," said the president of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexei Rakhmanov. "I am ready to confirm once again that we have delivery plans are not moving anywhere and are not changing - in 2022 the aircraft carrier will enter the Navy again, "Rakhmanov said." https://www.interfax.ru/russia/714614
РIA NEWS:" The fire on the aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov" will not affect the date of delivery of the ship to the fleet in 2022 after repair and modernization, the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexey Rakhmanov told RIA Novosti on Friday."...
So I'm wondering who works for whom ...

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Mykhalych

the damage from the fire alone amounted to 95 billion rubles.

But why really - rubles, they would write dollars at once

[Rzzz]

Quote: Mykhalych

Over the years, the ship burned and sank.

When did he sink?

[marchcat]

NI is trying to bring confusion to the minds of Russians, but is it worth believing everything ??? Time will tell who is right ...

[Doctor]

I remember the battleship Frunze, the former Poltava, the Sevastopol class.
Also one of the four, also a fragment of a great empire, changed his name, also never been in battles.
They also tortured the animal, tried to restore it in different forms.
Then the X hour came and it became clear that battleships should not be built, but hidden.

The zigzags of history, however.

[w70]

For scrap it

[Doccor18]

... so that the ship was simply allowed to serve up within five years. "

It will only be modernized for five years, as usual ...
And he will serve the country for another 15-20 years, until a new one appears.

[Greenwood]

A new one will not appear under the current state of affairs. Is that as another layout.

[Thrifty]

Probably, they called the editorial office, promised to close the publication, if they once again write an article about Russian armament that is not garbage, this is how this article was "radialized"!

[Tsoy]

National interest is a huge garbage dump in which there is nothing worthwhile. Why drag it here all the time? Moreover, the main immigrant there is from the Russian Federation, who is constantly shining in Russia-1. To see the order from above, use this particular site in order to raise the citricity of the site. If we take English sources, then there are normal informative resources like defense blog, armyrecognition and others.

[Quadro]

VO has long since slipped into a trash heap like the echo of Moscow and rain. That is, if we do not yet say how outright provocateurs and Natsiks of different bottling are not banned, but protected, otherwise there will not be a ton of comments without them.

[7,62x54]

NI most likely publishes some VO authors. The same extremes.

[anclevalico]

What kind of repair? Where is the money for this?

[leks]

Quote: marchcat

NI is trying to bring confusion to the minds of Russians, but is it worth believing everything ??? Time will tell who is right ...

Yeah, the only thing Russians do is read the National Interest (NI) every day.

[halpat]

Quote: leks

Quote: marchcat

NI is trying to bring confusion to the minds of Russians, but is it worth believing everything ??? Time will tell who is right ...

Yeah, the only thing Russians do is read the National Interest (NI) every day.

Crowds :)) gather around billboards and newsstands on the streets and read :))

[certero]

Quote: Arzt

Then the X hour came and it turned out that battleships should not be built, but hidden

In fact, battleships should have been armed with better anti-aircraft guns.
She put it on there, not in battleships, but in admirals. Possessing absolute superiority at sea, they could not stop the evacuation of the Germans, first from Taman, and then from the Crimea

[Object.F7]

So what, did a bunch of anti-aircraft guns help Yamato? And Musashi? Bismarck? Tirpitz? The Second World War completely buried battleships as a class, the United States, realizing this, refused to complete the construction of Montana, and no country in the world built battleships anymore. They decided to run over the admirals from the couch, a lot of courage. What kind of superiority at sea can we talk about when torpedo bombers and dive bombers had a tactical advantage. It is impossible to provide air cover on a XNUMX/XNUMX basis, while the attacking aircraft itself can choose the place and time of the attack

[mlad]

An aircraft carrier is a huge vessel stuffed with thousands of mechanisms, imagine how many times it breaks down more than a car, especially our auto industry can boast of this, even the British have problems, and the French have major repairs after almost every trip. Does Russia need this headache at the moment?

[Million]

Why isn't Putin building aircraft carriers?

[halpat]

Quote: Million

Why isn't Putin building aircraft carriers?

someone misinformed you. Builds and how. The night shift just goes out

[Alexey-74]

Another scribbler has expressed his opinion. Time will tell why they even touch on this topic.

[APASUS]

Until something is built to replace it, Kuznetsov will remain the basis of the Russian AUG. In the meantime, only plans have been announced

[Real Pilot]

Quote: marchcat

NI is trying to bring confusion to the minds of Russians, but is it worth believing everything ??? Time will tell who is right ...

And why exactly the Russians? They work for an internal, American portman ...
First, they scare you with a "nightmare" in the form of regular aircraft carriers / planes / tanks, then they say that you definitely need to roll out your new one and get steeper and more expensive! Well, then they soften the pill with a happy ending that Russia cannot do anything of this
And then representatives of all political spectra in the United States can quote paragraphs to taste ...
And our discussion here is so ... Not their priority.

[silverura]

Sorry for Kuzya! But not what, maybe World of Ships is similar at once with Lazarev. Oh mother Russia!

[eleronn]

Kuzya was not imprisoned on the Su-33! He had to carry ship MiGs and! Poghosyan proved to be more tenacious.

[Cympak]

It just so happened that the MIG made a more advanced avionics car than the Su-33 - the MiG-29K, which was made on the basis of the MiG-29M. But then the USSR collapsed and they decided to take a more ready-made Su-33.

[Kart]

The author of the material declares that the repairs on the Russian aircraft-carrying cruiser are being delayed and "according to its results, the combat effectiveness may not be up to the mark." By what criteria such conclusions are made is not clear.

According to the criteria of Russophobia, that is, hatred and contempt for Russians.
Exactly for the same reasons for which domestic fighters against the regime are howling in unison with the United States.

[onstar9]

Will the flooded holds there, on the Kuza, which they never hoped to pump out, will be pumped out?

[Just Arkady]

Why should this trough still be modernized. Lots of money going nowhere. Send it back to Syria so that it starts to smoke and the planes fall from it.