Military Review

NI: The work on the aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov" is too extensive for the ship to simply be given five years to serve

42
NI: The work on the aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov" is too extensive for the ship to simply be given five years to serve

The American media presented their version of the development of events with the repair and modernization of the only Russian aircraft carrier, Admiral Kuznetsov. If just a few weeks ago the aircraft-carrying cruiser of the Russian Navy was called "one of the most formidable warships" in Russia, now in the American media there are largely opposite judgments. And we are talking about the same edition.


The notorious Russian magazine The National Interest (NI) distinguished itself with its material, in which it announced the possible loss of combat capability of the Admiral Kuznetsov after repairs.

The author of the material declares that the repairs on the Russian aircraft-carrying cruiser are being delayed and "according to its results, the combat effectiveness may not be up to the mark." By what criteria such conclusions are made is not clear.

At the same time, in the American media, the author states that work on the aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov", "allowing the Russian the fleet to be part of the exclusive club of the world's fleets "are" excessively extensive for the ship to simply be allowed to serve within five years. " Previously, it was precisely the five-year period of stay in the Russian Navy that the responsible persons in Russia announced.

Recall that boilers are being replaced on the aircraft-carrying cruiser, the deck is being repaired after a crane falls on it when the floating dock is flooded, other blocks and assemblies are being repaired, as well as modernization for the use of the latest weapons.

Earlier it was announced that the aircraft-carrying cruiser will return to service after repair and modernization in 2022.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 10 December 2020 06: 14
    +10
    Upgrade, for 5 years of service? request fool
    Earlier, it was precisely the five-year period of stay in the Russian Navy that the responsible persons in Russia announced.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 10 December 2020 06: 34
      +9
      just allowed to serve within five years
      No thoughts, only speculation ... recourse
    2. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 10 December 2020 06: 53
      +6
      Is it worth paying attention to such articles? request
    3. Civil
      Civil 10 December 2020 07: 21
      +5
      Do this for at least 10 years.
    4. Profiler
      Profiler 10 December 2020 08: 11
      +8
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Upgrade, for 5 years of service?

      Earlier, it was precisely the five-year period of stay in the Russian Navy that the responsible persons in Russia announced.

      You are right, such funds and resources are not invested in a ship that has such a short service life - only five years.

      Something not named "responsible persons" (and who are they?), Or blurted out yes
    5. Paul Siebert
      Paul Siebert 10 December 2020 10: 37
      +2
      In general, National Interest has recently been paying a lot of attention to our aircraft carrier fleet.
      Quite recently I read an article about the revival of a project like "Ulyanovsk".
      the author calls such a project of a Russian aircraft carrier "a US nightmare."
      Already seventy airplanes and helicopters will be able to carry on board! ..
      And the "Nimitz" itself will be larger - as much as 1000 feet in length! ..
      And then there's the "Kuznetsov" out of the dock.
      For five years.
      It's time for the mattress admirals to jump into the windows!
      Russians are swimming!
      In general - less projection and more work!
      The aircraft carrier fleet in Russia needs not only to be revived, but to be created based on modern challenges and new strategies ... wink
      1. iouris
        iouris 10 December 2020 11: 22
        +10
        We do not have an aircraft carrier fleet.
        1. Vladimir61
          Vladimir61 10 December 2020 12: 34
          -1
          Quote: iouris
          We do not have an aircraft carrier fleet.

          Yes ... But, more recently, we had practically no army!
  2. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 10 December 2020 06: 19
    +2
    magazine The National Interest (NI) distinguished itself with material
    With the magazine it is clear if in two articles it contradicts itself. They say that after listening to several opinions, you will understand that the truth is somewhere in between. So maybe you need to listen to our specialists who are engaged in ship repairs and weapons modernization?
    1. Finches
      Finches 10 December 2020 06: 43
      -4
      Aff.tar, stop scribbling, run to San Diego UDC Bonhomme Richard, restore! And there is nothing to worry about Kuzya! In the Black Sea Fleet, the rescue ship Kommuna, produced in 1913, is still in service, so Kuzya will serve as long as necessary!
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 10 December 2020 07: 32
        +3
        Aff.tar, stop scribbling ...
        Judging by the fact that you are responding to my comment, this is addressed to me. So maybe you should read not just add letters, but also catch the meaning of what you read?
        1. Finches
          Finches 10 December 2020 07: 55
          +1
          Actually, not for you, but for the American correspondent ... But, apparently, you wanted to laughing
      2. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 10 December 2020 13: 48
        +2
        Quote: Finches
        in San Diego UDC Bonhomme Richard, rebuild!
        They will not restore it. The decision was made to put him on pins and needles, more it is cheaper.
  3. Mykhalych
    Mykhalych 10 December 2020 06: 33
    -2
    And again: " American media presented"... and some "Red line" presented that: In 2017, the only Russian aircraft carrier was delivered for repairs. It was originally planned to repair it by 2021 for 86 billion rubles. Over the years, the ship burned and sank. The damage from the fire alone amounted to 95 billion rubles. And the fleet will receive it no earlier than 2023. https://www.rline.tv/news/2020-05-25-vosstanovlenie-avianostsa-admiral-kuznetsov-otkladyvaetsya-na-gody/
    From Interfax infa such: "The only Russian aircraft carrier, Admiral Kuznetsov, will return to the Russian Navy after repairs in 2022, work on the ship is in full swing," said the president of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexei Rakhmanov. "I am ready to confirm once again that we have delivery plans are not moving anywhere and are not changing - in 2022 the aircraft carrier will enter the Navy again, "Rakhmanov said." https://www.interfax.ru/russia/714614
    РIA NEWS:" The fire on the aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov" will not affect the date of delivery of the ship to the fleet in 2022 after repair and modernization, the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexey Rakhmanov told RIA Novosti on Friday."...
    So I'm wondering who works for whom ... hi
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 10 December 2020 06: 50
      +5
      Quote: Mykhalych
      the damage from the fire alone amounted to 95 billion rubles.

      But why really - rubles, they would write dollars at once
    2. Rzzz
      Rzzz 10 December 2020 15: 03
      +2
      Quote: Mykhalych
      Over the years, the ship burned and sank.

      When did he sink?
  4. marchcat
    marchcat 10 December 2020 06: 50
    0
    NI is trying to bring confusion to the minds of Russians, but is it worth believing everything ??? Time will tell who is right ...
  5. Doctor
    Doctor 10 December 2020 07: 02
    +4
    I remember the battleship Frunze, the former Poltava, the Sevastopol class.
    Also one of the four, also a fragment of a great empire, changed his name, also never been in battles.
    They also tortured the animal, tried to restore it in different forms.
    Then the X hour came and it became clear that battleships should not be built, but hidden.

    The zigzags of history, however. wink
  6. w70
    w70 10 December 2020 07: 05
    -11%
    For scrap it
  7. Doccor18
    Doccor18 10 December 2020 07: 06
    -1
    ... so that the ship was simply allowed to serve up within five years. "

    It will only be modernized for five years, as usual ...
    And he will serve the country for another 15-20 years, until a new one appears.
    1. Greenwood
      Greenwood 12 December 2020 04: 46
      0
      A new one will not appear under the current state of affairs. Is that as another layout.
  8. Thrifty
    Thrifty 10 December 2020 07: 10
    +4
    Probably, they called the editorial office, promised to close the publication, if they once again write an article about Russian armament that is not garbage, this is how this article was "radialized"!
  9. Tsoy
    Tsoy 10 December 2020 07: 27
    +6
    National interest is a huge garbage dump in which there is nothing worthwhile. Why drag it here all the time? Moreover, the main immigrant there is from the Russian Federation, who is constantly shining in Russia-1. To see the order from above, use this particular site in order to raise the citricity of the site. If we take English sources, then there are normal informative resources like defense blog, armyrecognition and others.
    1. Quadro
      Quadro 10 December 2020 08: 46
      -1
      VO has long since slipped into a trash heap like the echo of Moscow and rain. That is, if we do not yet say how outright provocateurs and Natsiks of different bottling are not banned, but protected, otherwise there will not be a ton of comments without them.
  10. 7,62h54
    7,62h54 10 December 2020 07: 33
    +5
    NI most likely publishes some VO authors. The same extremes.
  11. anclevalico
    anclevalico 10 December 2020 07: 42
    -10%
    What kind of repair? Where is the money for this?
  12. leks
    leks 10 December 2020 07: 58
    +4
    Quote: marchcat
    NI is trying to bring confusion to the minds of Russians, but is it worth believing everything ??? Time will tell who is right ...

    Yeah, the only thing Russians do is read the National Interest (NI) every day.
    1. halpat
      halpat 10 December 2020 22: 20
      0
      Quote: leks
      Quote: marchcat
      NI is trying to bring confusion to the minds of Russians, but is it worth believing everything ??? Time will tell who is right ...

      Yeah, the only thing Russians do is read the National Interest (NI) every day.

      Crowds :)) gather around billboards and newsstands on the streets and read :))
  13. certero
    certero 10 December 2020 08: 08
    +4
    Quote: Arzt
    Then the X hour came and it turned out that battleships should not be built, but hidden

    In fact, battleships should have been armed with better anti-aircraft guns.
    She put it on there, not in battleships, but in admirals. Possessing absolute superiority at sea, they could not stop the evacuation of the Germans, first from Taman, and then from the Crimea
    1. Object.F7
      Object.F7 10 December 2020 23: 02
      0
      So what, did a bunch of anti-aircraft guns help Yamato? And Musashi? Bismarck? Tirpitz? The Second World War completely buried battleships as a class, the United States, realizing this, refused to complete the construction of Montana, and no country in the world built battleships anymore. They decided to run over the admirals from the couch, a lot of courage. What kind of superiority at sea can we talk about when torpedo bombers and dive bombers had a tactical advantage. It is impossible to provide air cover on a XNUMX/XNUMX basis, while the attacking aircraft itself can choose the place and time of the attack
  14. mlad
    mlad 10 December 2020 09: 05
    -4
    An aircraft carrier is a huge vessel stuffed with thousands of mechanisms, imagine how many times it breaks down more than a car, especially our auto industry can boast of this, even the British have problems, and the French have major repairs after almost every trip. Does Russia need this headache at the moment?
  15. Million
    Million 10 December 2020 09: 08
    -4
    Why isn't Putin building aircraft carriers?
    1. halpat
      halpat 10 December 2020 22: 22
      0
      Quote: Million
      Why isn't Putin building aircraft carriers?

      someone misinformed you. Builds and how. The night shift just goes out wink laughing
  16. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 10 December 2020 09: 44
    -1
    Another scribbler has expressed his opinion. Time will tell why they even touch on this topic.
  17. APASUS
    APASUS 10 December 2020 10: 57
    -1
    Until something is built to replace it, Kuznetsov will remain the basis of the Russian AUG. In the meantime, only plans have been announced
  18. RealPilot
    RealPilot 10 December 2020 14: 51
    -1
    Quote: marchcat
    NI is trying to bring confusion to the minds of Russians, but is it worth believing everything ??? Time will tell who is right ...

    And why exactly the Russians? They work for an internal, American portman ...
    First, they scare you with a "nightmare" in the form of regular aircraft carriers / planes / tanks, then they say that you definitely need to roll out your new one and get steeper and more expensive! Well, then they soften the pill with a happy ending that Russia cannot do anything of this wassat
    And then representatives of all political spectra in the United States can quote paragraphs to taste ...
    And our discussion here is so ... Not their priority.
  19. silverura
    silverura 10 December 2020 21: 45
    -1
    Sorry for Kuzya! But not what, maybe World of Ships is similar at once with Lazarev. Oh mother Russia!
  20. eleronn
    eleronn 11 December 2020 00: 18
    -1
    Kuzya was not imprisoned on the Su-33! He had to carry ship MiGs and! Poghosyan proved to be more tenacious.
    1. Cympak
      Cympak 11 December 2020 04: 02
      0
      It just so happened that the MIG made a more advanced avionics car than the Su-33 - the MiG-29K, which was made on the basis of the MiG-29M. But then the USSR collapsed and they decided to take a more ready-made Su-33.
  21. Kart
    Kart 11 December 2020 12: 05
    0
    The author of the material declares that the repairs on the Russian aircraft-carrying cruiser are being delayed and "according to its results, the combat effectiveness may not be up to the mark." By what criteria such conclusions are made is not clear.

    According to the criteria of Russophobia, that is, hatred and contempt for Russians.
    Exactly for the same reasons for which domestic fighters against the regime are howling in unison with the United States.
  22. onstar9
    onstar9 12 December 2020 04: 41
    0
    Will the flooded holds there, on the Kuza, which they never hoped to pump out, will be pumped out?
  23. Just Arkady
    Just Arkady 14 December 2020 16: 40
    +1
    Why should this trough still be modernized. Lots of money going nowhere. Send it back to Syria so that it starts to smoke and the planes fall from it.