Military Review

Rostec told about the timing of serial deliveries to the troops of the T-14 "Armata"

98
Rostec told about the timing of serial deliveries to the troops of the T-14 "Armata"

Serial deliveries of Russian tank T-14 "Armata" troops are scheduled for the next, 2021. This was announced by the head of "Rostec" Sergei Chemezov.


According to Chemezov, in the future, the Armata tank will become the new main tank of the Russian army. Serial deliveries of the T-14 to the troops will begin in 2021.

Serial deliveries of the T-14 tank on the Armata platform will begin in 2021. It is by far the best tank in the world today. In the future, this vehicle will be the new main tank of the Russian army.

- He explained to reporters.

The head of Rostec emphasized that advanced technologies are used in Armata, all processes are automated as much as possible.

(...) the crew of the "Armata" does not need to aim precisely, it is only necessary to roughly aim the gun at the target. The electronics will do everything on its own - it will accurately determine the distance to the target and aim the weapon at it. That is, this machine uses elements of artificial intelligence that help the crew to fire.

- he added.

At the same time, the unmanned version of the Armata tank will not go into series production, this vehicle was created only for testing unmanned technologies.

Chemezov also noted that the T-14 "Armata" tank is preparing to move abroad, the vehicle has already received all the necessary documents for sale to foreign customers. An advertising campaign is currently underway.

Earlier, some media outlets, citing the Ministry of Defense, reported that the military department signed a contract for the supply of two battalions of T-14 tanks and a battalion of BMP T-15 for military tests.
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. evgen1221
    evgen1221 7 December 2020 09: 51
    -18%
    Well, if according to the old scheme they will sell-2 for sold, we will build 0.2 for ourselves. No thanks.
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 7 December 2020 10: 01
      +4
      What kind of sadness are you?) Skoliao MO will order so much and receive. Orders are always a priority for him. Export is in second place. There is a completely different price calculation system.
      1. BAI
        BAI 7 December 2020 10: 23
        +13
        Export is in second place.

        Always first, if possible (political decision). We often supply equipment from the beginning abroad, and then to the army. On the money received from exports, factories survived (survive).
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 7 December 2020 11: 04
          +1
          If there is a MO order, then it is a priority. It won't be enough for a breakdown.
          1. Aerodrome
            Aerodrome 7 December 2020 12: 24
            +5
            Quote: carstorm 11
            ... It won't be enough for a breakdown.

            laughing still rolled ...
            1. carstorm 11
              carstorm 11 7 December 2020 12: 32
              -2
              All owls that I know go through either grandiose scandals or through the courts. Business as usual. We mean serial deliveries.
          2. ROSS_51
            ROSS_51 7 December 2020 22: 11
            +2
            Quote: carstorm 11
            If there is a MO order, then it is a priority. It won't be enough for a breakdown.

            Um ... excuse me, but the disruption of state defense orders is already a historical tradition. There is no one to do enough money and nothing.
            1. carstorm 11
              carstorm 11 7 December 2020 23: 02
              0
              The Ministry of Defense is now filing for disruptions. Or negotiates without it, but the manufacturer is no better off. Yes, and I repeat, I'm talking about disruptions to serial deliveries, not development or testing. It's different.
              1. ROSS_51
                ROSS_51 8 December 2020 05: 29
                +1
                Quote: carstorm 11
                Yes, and I repeat, I'm talking about disruptions to serial deliveries and not development or testing. It's different

                Yes, what kind of developments .. I'm also talking to you about elementary planned repairs .. There are no specialists, they pull on business trips from the head enterprises, paying for it with frantic chef-hours.
                There are simply no components, because the products were still produced in the USSR.
                Helicopter, aviation, marine gas turbines were produced in Ukraine. Who will the Ministry of Defense go to court against? On non-brothers?
                We are setting up our production - it's a good business, but how much money did it eat?
                1. carstorm 11
                  carstorm 11 8 December 2020 05: 37
                  +2
                  And what choice did they leave?) It was impossible to predict what happened at the age of 14. The difficulties had to be overcome. In the future, it will all pay off with a torus
                  1. Jager
                    Jager 8 December 2020 19: 03
                    0
                    Ukraine-2014 - such an outcome could not but predict only the deaf-blind-mute, the only difference was "when will it explode?"
                    The war in Donbass was a foregone conclusion as soon as Yanukovych fled. It was clear even to me)
                    1. carstorm 11
                      carstorm 11 10 December 2020 00: 50
                      0
                      The conversation goes for up to 14 years) factories are not built in a month
        2. Hermit21
          Hermit21 7 December 2020 11: 11
          0
          We often supply equipment from the beginning abroad, and then to the army


          This practice has long been abandoned. Now first for myself, and then for export
          1. sustav75
            sustav75 8 December 2020 07: 20
            -1
            No export! All countries are afraid of US sanctions! And not in a hurry for yourself! They stretch orders for many years, so that hard workers at military factories get at least something ...
            1. Hermit21
              Hermit21 8 December 2020 08: 17
              -2
              Examples over the past 10 years
        3. Revolver
          Revolver 7 December 2020 11: 16
          +5
          The main thing is not to sell to China, otherwise China will soon put into service its "completely originally developed in China"No. Typ **, suspiciously similar to the T-14. And they just won't have any difficulties with serial production.
          But it is quite possible for some Saud or Emirates. They have money, but there are no specialists, no technology, no production capacity to copy, because it is easier for them to buy.
          And turkeys are also quite possible, even if they want to copy, they will buy a license, and they will still buy a lot of components that they cannot localize.
          1. dzvero
            dzvero 7 December 2020 12: 52
            +6
            The main thing is not to sell to China

            It's too late, they already took a picture of it smile
          2. Altona
            Altona 7 December 2020 13: 13
            +4
            Quote: Nagan
            But it is quite possible for some Saud or Emirates. They have money, but there are no specialists, no technology, no production capacity to copy, because it is easier for them to buy.

            -------------------------
            How is it not? They have everything, they are all around the co-owners of high-tech companies, the oil age is ending. In general, if you sell something new now, it will turn out like with the S-400. Everything will go to the "partners" for study.
          3. Hermit21
            Hermit21 8 December 2020 08: 23
            -2
            The Chinese can do something similar in appearance, but in terms of filling and applied technologies - not according to Juan sombrero. And, I am sure, even such a layout will be perverted and on .... t its pluses. Vaughn, recently there was a broadcast on Chinese television with a promising tank. Double, and the seats are pushed as far as possible to the sides, although normal people, on the contrary, would have moved them to the center. Little detail, but speaks volumes
        4. venik
          venik 7 December 2020 13: 48
          0
          Quote: BAI
          We often supply equipment from the beginning abroad, and then to the army.

          =========
          Name examples when equipment was not yet adopted by the Russian Army for export.
          PS Special export projects (mostly offshore) - please do not specify.
          1. Evil Booth
            Evil Booth 7 December 2020 22: 32
            0
            a great many, and even those that have not yet existed such as anti-tank guided missiles and armor. so what?
        5. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 8 December 2020 15: 36
          0
          Quote: BAI
          We often supply equipment from the beginning abroad, and then to the army.

          1. Not always. Hindus, for example, never buy MBTs that are not in service with any selling country. Whether it's RF or Storage ...
          2. For some reason you do not say that this is only outwardly the same technique. What goes for export has always been on the third track, starting with the ATS countries and the "third world".
          3. For export copies can be installed "stuffing" and third countries: laser rangefinders, IR equipment / sights, for example, from France or Israel ...
          4. A colleague correctly noted that the "prices" for them are different - "bazaar" - and the market price, well, is very different from the cost price and the internal price for the RF Ministry of Defense. In addition, now well, it has become very fashionable "service" maintenance of MBT. Arabs are very greedy for this, because they are lazy and not ... curious with hands from below the waist.
          Somehow, however. AHA.
      2. Svateev
        Svateev 7 December 2020 10: 33
        -18%
        Quote: carstorm 11
        Skoliao MO will order and receive that much.

        First, you need to work out tactics for this "tank", in which the tower is armored only from 12,7 mm. Any automatic cannon of any modern BMP and even a 14,5-mm KPVT on an armored personnel carrier can penetrate the armor of the Armata turret.
        This "tank" should not be allowed into battle, as was the case with normal tanks. He can only support 2 kilometers with fire.
        Fire support tank!
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 7 December 2020 11: 07
          -3
          I, too, do not yet understand his place on the battlefield. The ideal option so far seems to be its connection with the previous generation. He sees further, reacts faster. He can really strengthen tank units at this stage. Something like command vehicles. Then he is still transforming anyway. But so far I see
          1. Old tanker
            Old tanker 7 December 2020 17: 52
            +1
            Command vehicles for control of the battle by the battalion commander. Not to support line tanks. As the practice of exercises shows (we have not had any other battles with tank battles as part of a battalion and a regiment for a long time), these tanks do not even have to shoot.
            1. Svateev
              Svateev 18 December 2020 20: 18
              0
              Quote: Old Tankman
              Command vehicles for control of the battle by the battalion commander. Not to support line tanks.

              Well, if only so. However, on the website of the shopping center "Zvezda" Armata is positioned exactly like that.
              True, the radar, which has an operating range of 100 km, unmasks the Armata by about 400 km. So the battalion commander will give out the location of his battalion with his head.
              So what is the tactic of using Armata?
        2. figwam
          figwam 7 December 2020 11: 17
          +6
          Quote: Svateev
          This "tank" should not be allowed into battle, as was the case with normal tanks.

          A large-caliber machine gun can damage any tank, damage or demolish all attachments from the tower.
          1. Svateev
            Svateev 18 December 2020 20: 19
            0
            Quote: figvam
            A large-caliber machine gun can damage any tank, damage or demolish all attachments from the tower.

            That is why everything that can work under the armor is hidden under the armor.
            And in the Armata, much is hidden only under the casing.
        3. Hermit21
          Hermit21 7 December 2020 11: 52
          +3
          Just against any small-caliber trivia, the so-called. "active materials". Plus what is seen from the outside is essentially a lightweight casing. The main booking is hidden under it. Plus SAZ, plus DZ on the roof of the tower. It's not that simple there. If you make a "classic" turret booking, all the benefits of this layout are lost, when the weight saved on the turret can be used to protect the crew
          1. Svateev
            Svateev 18 December 2020 19: 50
            0
            Quote: Hermit21
            Just against any small-caliber trivia, the so-called. "active materials".

            More specifically? The term "active materials" is intended to avoid direct response.
            Quote: Hermit21
            Plus what is seen from the outside is essentially a lightweight casing.

            That's it. From small arms bullets.
            Quote: Hermit21
            The main booking is hidden under it.

            But the KAZ control units, coherent and much more are located under this casing and are NOT covered by the main armor.
            Quote: Hermit21
            Plus SAZ

            Which does NOT protect the BMP from a burst or even a single shot of an automatic cannon.
            Quote: Hermit21
            plus DZ on the roof of the tower.

            Firstly, I did not see DZ, indicate with an arrow. And explain what will become of the casing when the remote control is triggered on it.
            Secondly, DZ usually does NOT fire from 25-30-mm sub-caliber projectiles of an automatic cannon.
            Quote: Hermit21
            It's not that simple there. If you make a "classic" turret booking, all the benefits of this layout are lost, when the weight saved on the turret can be used to protect the crew

            THAT'S IT ! The stupid task was set "to additionally protect the crew without increasing the mass of the tank. As a result, we weakened the protection of many of the tank's systems, pushing them under the casing. And what do you think the crew will survive if its KAZ gets hit after a line with an infantry fighting vehicle ?!
            A tank is an armor protection. If there is no armor protection, it is an infantry fighting vehicle, self-propelled guns and the like, but not a tank. Not the right tactic.
            1. Hermit21
              Hermit21 19 December 2020 08: 30
              0
              At the end of the 90s, as a result of prospecting carried out by the Research Institute of Steel together with a number of institutes of the Academy of Sciences, the discovery of the effect of hyper-speed destruction of high-strength materials was recorded. Under certain conditions, high pressures and temperatures, some materials, including armored steels, begin to collapse at a rate commensurate with the rate of penetration of the shell into the armor. This effect has opened up completely new perspectives in the creation of the defense of military equipment. Even then, the first attempts were made to apply the discovery for practical purposes. However, more than 10 years passed before it began to produce concrete results.
              Based on the open phenomenon, a new armored vehicle protection system was developed and comprehensively tested. Numerous organizations took part in the implementation of this project, however, the Research Institute of Steel, IVTAN AN RF, the Russian Federal Nuclear Center VNII Experimental Physics (Sarov) and the KNIIM (Krasnoarmeysk) made the largest contribution.
              But the KAZ control units, coherent and much more are located under this casing and are NOT covered by the main armor.

              Like other tanks.
              Which does NOT protect the BMP from a burst or even a single shot of an automatic cannon.

              It is against such nasty things, on which KAZ incite wasteful, and active materials have been created
              Firstly, I did not see DZ, indicate with an arrow. And explain what will become of the casing when the remote control is triggered on it.
              Secondly, DZ usually does NOT fire from 25-30-mm sub-caliber projectiles of an automatic cannon.

              Top view of the squares in front of the tower. Nothing will happen with the casing, and DZ is against trifles and does not need to be triggered - it will physically detain them, and under it, for sure, there is also AM (active materials)
              The stupid task was set "to additionally protect the crew without increasing the mass of the tank.

              In fact, it has increased compared to the current ones.
              As a result, we weakened the protection of many tank systems, pushing them under the casing.

              What kind?
              And what do you think the crew will survive if its KAZ gets hit after the line with the BMP ?!

              KAZ (SAZ) is only one of the elements to ensure survivability.
              A tank is an armor protection. If there is no armor protection, it is an infantry fighting vehicle, self-propelled guns and the like, but not a tank.

              The T-14 is in full order with this.

            2. Old tanker
              Old tanker 21 December 2020 07: 23
              0
              Find on the Internet a photo of the Armata tower without a casing and you will understand that everything you need is very well booked there.
        4. Bad_gr
          Bad_gr 7 December 2020 11: 52
          +7
          Quote: Svateev
          whose turret is only armored from 12,7 mm. Any automatic cannon of any modern BMP and even a 14,5-mm KPVT on an armored personnel carrier can penetrate the armor of the Armata turret.

          This topic has been discussed more than once: only elements that cannot be hidden under normal armor are covered with thin armor. How to hide KAZ locators? sight glass sight? mortars KAZ? smokescreen mortars?
          The cannon and vital elements are covered normally.



          1. Svateev
            Svateev 18 December 2020 20: 04
            -1
            Quote: Bad_gr
            only elements that cannot be hidden under normal are covered with thin armor. How to hide KAZ locators? sight glass sight? mortars KAZ? smokescreen mortars?

            So you hid the KAZ locator under the armor casing ?! And the antenna is also there - under the metal sheet ?! Did you understand what you wrote?
            Let's sort it out on the shelves: on normal tanks from under the armor stick out only what cannot work under the armor by definition and what can work there is hiding under the armor:
            - mortars and an antenna of the KAZ locator - on the armor, all antenna units and, in general, KAZ - under the armor; and Armata has blocks under the casing;
            - sights lenses (as it is called, not a sight glass) are on the armor, and the rest of the sight is under the armor, and the Armata has some kind of sight block under the casing;
            - etc.
            Quote: Bad_gr
            The cannon and vital elements are covered normally.

            You are cheating - you posted pictures without those KAZ units, radio communications and other systems that are located under the casing and are not protected by normal armor.
            1. Bad_gr
              Bad_gr 18 December 2020 20: 30
              +1
              Quote: Svateev
              So you hid the KAZ locator under the armor casing ?! And the antenna is also there - under the metal sheet ?! Did you understand what you wrote?

              I was sure I wrote it clearly. Okay, I'll try again.
              Such devices as KAZ locators, laser irradiation sensors, video cameras, optics, smoke screen mortars (such as "curtain") all this cannot be hidden under the armor - it must be outside. All this is outside and installed. But each device is wired (power supply, signal cable, etc.) and drilling a hole in the main armor for each of them is nonsense. All of these cables are most likely bundled and routed into the turret through the main armor in a place where enemy ammunition is least likely to hit. Therefore, all this economy is covered from accidental damage by light armor, which contains windows for all these sensors, cameras, sights, etc.
              The penetration of this armor can lead to a decrease in some of the tank's protective functions, but its main mechanisms are covered with the main armor and are unlikely to suffer. The tank will be able to continue performing its tasks.
              1. Svateev
                Svateev 18 December 2020 20: 38
                0
                Quote: Bad_gr
                All of these cables are most likely bundled and routed into the turret through the main armor in a place where enemy ammunition is least likely to hit. Therefore, all this economy is covered with light armor from accidental damage,

                If only the connecting cables - I would not pester with questions. And then the casing would have been removed and shown openly: look, we only cover the cables from bullets and fragments.
                But there are animations where under the casing there are a lot of blocks of equipment - KAZ, communications, I don’t remember anything else, you need to look. Everything that was previously placed in a normal turret under normal armor is now actually in the same place - in the turret, but already under the casing.
                So I pester with a question on all "Armies" - what's under the casing? Show! Do not show.
                And what can be the conclusion from this?
                1. Bad_gr
                  Bad_gr 18 December 2020 20: 44
                  0
                  Quote: Svateev
                  ..Show! Do not show.
                  And what can be the conclusion from this?

                  And rightly so. If the enemy knows where and what is going there, he will already know exactly where to shoot armor-piercing in order to disable a specific block. Therefore, this information should not be publicly available.
                  PS
                  I am sure that apart from the wiring, there is nothing there: in the design bureau, not stupid people are sitting in order to bring something important outside under the main armor.
                  1. Svateev
                    Svateev 24 December 2020 18: 30
                    0
                    Quote: Bad_gr
                    If the enemy knows where and what is going there, he will already know exactly where to shoot with armor-piercing,

                    There is no need for armor-piercing. There is enough from 14,5 mm and larger. The BMP cannon will handle it.
                    Quote: Bad_gr
                    in KB, not stupid people are sitting in order to take something important outside and under the main armor.

                    Even a non-stupid person is not able to fulfill a stupid TK. You can’t shove something that isn’t crammed in!
                    If you were instructed to additionally book a crew capsule and not increase the weight of the tank, what will you do? I'm waiting for suggestions from a not stupid person ...
              2. Svateev
                Svateev 24 December 2020 18: 32
                0
                Quote: Bad_gr
                The tank will be able to continue performing its tasks.

                Without KAZ? Without COEP? Without communication? All these blocks are under the casing. I emphasize once again: not the input and output parts of these devices, but the blocks of their equipment. Below are the pictures.
          2. Svateev
            Svateev 24 December 2020 18: 22
            0
            Quote: Bad_gr
            The cannon and vital elements are covered normally.

            In your pictures, there is a concept that is clearly far from what happened:
            Left view

            Right view

            As you can see, under the casing are blocks of equipment, which in a normal tank are under normal cannon-proof armor.
        5. Boris Chernikov
          Boris Chernikov 7 December 2020 18: 55
          +1
          aha ... 12,7, aha
          laughing
          1. Svateev
            Svateev 18 December 2020 20: 05
            -1
            Quote: Boris Chernikov
            12,7, yeah

            Sure sure. Only from 12,7mm and protects the casing, under which there are a bunch of different blocks of different systems that you did not show in the picture. And they are there.
            1. Boris Chernikov
              Boris Chernikov 18 December 2020 21: 42
              -2
              "a bunch of blocks" .. for example?
              1. Svateev
                Svateev 24 December 2020 18: 34
                0
                See above.
                1. Boris Chernikov
                  Boris Chernikov 24 December 2020 19: 20
                  -2
                  of all the blocks there that can come under attack are radar modules, and the exact thickness of the armor of the mounted blocks and the modules themselves is unknown, which allows us to say that they will protect from 12,7 due to the thickness and inclination
    2. Alexey from Perm
      Alexey from Perm 7 December 2020 10: 17
      -32%
      this is the only way this government works, it's time to get used to it
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Boris Chernikov
        Boris Chernikov 7 December 2020 18: 56
        0
        Well, yes .. the communists at one time gave out a bunch of equipment just like that ..
      3. Svateev
        Svateev 18 December 2020 20: 11
        0
        Quote: Alexey from Perm
        this is the only way this power works,

        Just don't need "general political conclusions"! Let's talk about a specific error of a specific official. In this case, about the erroneous TK, when, after the terrible shots of the burning of the T-72 in Syria, a specific official wanted the best way - to protect the crew. But he posed the task in a foolish way: to supply the crew with additional armor, but not to increase the weight of the tank, more problems with transportation, bridges, etc. etc. But then you need to remove the armor from somewhere. They took it off the tower, now there is no crew there. But the equipment cannot be squeezed, and some of the blocks instead of normal armor are now under the casing.
    3. Herman 4223
      Herman 4223 7 December 2020 14: 32
      0
      There has never been such a scheme.
  2. Hog
    Hog 7 December 2020 09: 52
    +3
    Well, finally, waited good
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 7 December 2020 10: 04
      +1
      Actually, it was said at the army in 2019))) that it will go serially from the age of 21
    2. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 7 December 2020 10: 06
      0
      Serial deliveries of the T-14 to the troops will begin in 2021.
      Long-awaited news! good
      1. figwam
        figwam 7 December 2020 11: 27
        0
        I hope it will go into production with the KAZ system.
        1. DAQ
          DAQ 7 December 2020 15: 07
          +3
          I hope it will go into the series with the KAZ system

          Something tells me what will happen without KAZ. The bar was raised too high when the tank's capabilities were announced. Like the 152mm cannon, it will not be there yet, so much will not be on it yet. I don't think that soon it will be possible to shoot down BOPS with the help of KAZ. Although, first of all, we need protection from ATGMs.
          Leave the modernization potential so to speak. The first episode will be "naked"
          And then, layer by layer, they will upgrade.
          1. figwam
            figwam 7 December 2020 15: 55
            +3
            Quote: Nasdaq
            The first episode will be "naked"

            No, I think that he will already be with "Afghanit".
          2. Boris Chernikov
            Boris Chernikov 7 December 2020 18: 56
            -4
            and why should he suddenly go without KAZ?
            1. DAQ
              DAQ 7 December 2020 19: 05
              +1
              Technologically very complex system.
              Especially with pretensions to intercept BOPS.

              On a test bench (in ideal conditions, in one place, when there are no obstacles in the form of fences, poles, buildings, and other structures past which a tank is passing), it is not so difficult to achieve the work of KAZ.
              It is much more difficult to create a complex that would work in a "combat situation".
              1. Boris Chernikov
                Boris Chernikov 7 December 2020 19: 16
                +6
                those. you don’t have any factual data that the kaz does not work, except for "it seems to me that the kaz is a complicated thing"? And even if we assume that KAZ does not know how in BOPS, say, because of the lag in electronics or the need to improve the control system, then KAZ will be in any case, because it intercepts missiles and RPGs now, and then announce the appearance of the T-14A and it is much easier to shove in the already modified KAZ ... all the more so that there is a question in the political sphere
    3. Alexander Vorontsov
      Alexander Vorontsov 7 December 2020 10: 09
      +8
      Quote: Hog
      Well, finally, waited

      So there were already many such promises.
      Why wait for something? When the units receive them, then we will shout and wait.
      1. Kart
        Kart 7 December 2020 11: 01
        +7
        Well, when Musk talks about the domes and gardens on Mars, some of us moan in chorus about the greatest country, and furiously water it with what is known to be their own.
        True, there are no domes, and most likely there will not be, but it doesn't matter.
        "This is another!"
        1. Alexander Vorontsov
          Alexander Vorontsov 7 December 2020 11: 56
          +6
          This is the other extreme.
          I'm only talking about realities, a promise is, if a reason, then only for "cautious optimism".
          They cluck in the fall and count and promise does not mean marry.

          As for the promises of officials, there is a funny episode - at the end it is especially funny))) "Why are you sticking" ?!
        2. tralflot1832
          tralflot1832 7 December 2020 19: 13
          0
          Here at the Mask, a little bit can happen to Tesla, let's see how Tesla of the Chinese assembly goes in Europe.
  3. Fungus
    Fungus 7 December 2020 09: 53
    -1
    The long-awaited tank. We wait.
  4. Yrec
    Yrec 7 December 2020 10: 04
    +5
    "Serial deliveries of the Russian T-14 Armata tank in 21 years" and "the military department signed a contract for the supply of two battalions of T-14 tanks and a battalion of BMP T-15 for military tests." These are completely different things. T-14 will become MBT it will not be very soon. And its appearance will most likely be far from the current one. In order to carry out "Serial deliveries" it is necessary to build the ENTIRE technological chain for the series (all parts / components / assemblies), and not just assembly on the conveyor. This T-72/90 must leave the conveyor, otherwise there will be an oversupply of capacity.Russia is not the USSR - it will not pull the production of several types of MBT.
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 7 December 2020 10: 15
      +2
      The chain is half the battle. Training, instructions, simulators. There is still a carriage to do. The car will fit into the troops for a long time.
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 7 December 2020 11: 46
        0
        Quote: carstorm 11
        Training, instructions, simulators. There is still a carriage to do.

        It has been done for a long time.
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 7 December 2020 12: 30
          0
          I know. But I already had in mind all this in the troops. In schools.
  5. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 7 December 2020 10: 06
    +2
    Chemezov also noted that the T-14 "Armata" tank is preparing to move abroad, the vehicle has already received all the necessary documents for sale to foreign customers. An advertising campaign is currently underway.

    And as they shouted not so long ago: Not a single "Armata" (Su-57) will be sold abroad until a sufficient number of them appear in the troops! "So what?
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 7 December 2020 10: 20
      0
      Product promotion is a sooooo long process. It starts from the moment of sketches. Well, if you want to sell it, of course. And in such a market as an arms market it is even more difficult.
    2. Genry
      Genry 7 December 2020 10: 47
      -6
      Quote: Stroibat stock
      And as they shouted not so long ago: Not a single "Armata"
      ...

      Who shouted?
      These are your fellow thinkers who said that until Russia has a sufficient number of weapons, none of the foreigners will buy.
    3. Sidor Amenpodestovich
      Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 December 2020 10: 57
      0
      Quote: Stroibat stock
      And as they shouted not so long ago: Not a single "Armata" (Su-57) will be sold abroad until a sufficient number of them appear in the troops! "So what?

      I join the question.

      Who shouted, my dear?
      1. Reserve buildbat
        Reserve buildbat 7 December 2020 12: 34
        -4
        Officials, my dear.
        1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
          Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 December 2020 12: 49
          +3
          Officials, my dear.

          Link to the source, please.
          And so far it turns out something like this:
          "As reported by the news agency" I heard the ringing, but I don't know where it is ", according to a usually very knowledgeable source," One grandmother said. "
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon 7 December 2020 13: 31
          +1
          Quote: stock buildbat
          Officials, my dear.

          It's like - "I don't know, I don't remember, it seems like someone from the crowd in the square"
    4. Boris Chernikov
      Boris Chernikov 7 December 2020 19: 02
      -1
      and who is stopping now to start concluding contracts? especially since the real needs of troops in "sufficient numbers" are 200-250 vehicles, with deliveries of up to 3 battalions per year, this need will be covered by 2025, just the customers will scrape together money for the purchase of T-14S ... 15 years more than 500-600 T-14 in the army in all its modifications can hardly be expected, but the appearance of the T-90M1 and T-72b4 unified in armament, suo, dz and asuv is worth it ..
  6. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 7 December 2020 10: 09
    +2
    Step, step, step, brothers, step ... All of Europe, in three smoke breaks ... No need to rush. Russian tanks should scare the enemy to diarrhea, even before all kinds of hostilities ... During the Soviet era, they were very much afraid. Up to the burial of nuclear bombs in YOUR territory, in tank-hazardous areas. I am glad that the Russian engineering school is reviving ... And the industry can embody ... And there is no need to tell tales that there is no electronics, and in general. There is military microelectronics in Russia. And there are optics ... they spend a lot of money on it, yes. But there is nowhere to go.
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 7 December 2020 19: 10
      +2
      The coolest "approximately" knew where they were buried and it was possible to go around them.
  7. Galleon
    Galleon 7 December 2020 10: 10
    +14
    When I hear in the news - mind you - in the news - the words "told" and "perspective", I want to burst into an obscene anecdote about the prospect of Bobik and his owners. Well, this is not news for VO, about how the auto-tracking of the target works, and a high-ranking nobleman broadcasts to us about this as about artificial intelligence. Indeed, the power of some needs the stupidity of others! People, the main property of AI is self-learning. Therefore, there can be no AI in disposable devices. Maybe the signal analyzer is cool, the filters are good, but not the AI. If there is no self-learning, there is no AI, there is a software package.
    1. BAI
      BAI 7 December 2020 10: 25
      +1
      The key word here is "element" of the AI. And this element has long been attached to everything that has at least one transistor.
    2. ANB
      ANB 7 December 2020 13: 44
      +2
      ... If there is no self-learning, there is no AI

      Self-learning is also only an AI element.
  8. Stepych
    Stepych 7 December 2020 10: 16
    +3
    There is a great tech tool tip in Blade Runner 2049.
    In the film, a drone is installed on the roof of a flying car, flies out and surveys the area.
    Also, a drone could be placed on the roof of the tank, the crew commander could view the terrain from a height.
    1. Vladimir61
      Vladimir61 7 December 2020 10: 48
      +8
      Quote: Stepych
      there is a great tech tool tip in Blade Runner 2049. In the film, a drone is installed on the roof of a flying car, flies out and surveys the area. Also, a drone could be placed on the roof of the tank, the crew commander could view the terrain from a height.
      You are late with an offer. The UAV is already tied there (the tank is also capable of launching the Pterodactyl unmanned reconnaissance and target designation vehicle with its own surveillance radar and infrared sight.).
  9. BAI
    BAI 7 December 2020 10: 20
    +3
    Has it been out of date for an hour? What protection against drones?
    1. Fungus
      Fungus 7 December 2020 10: 28
      0
      Currently the most modern tank in the world. A tank is a tank. Against drones, it will be covered by air defense and electronic warfare systems.
  10. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 7 December 2020 10: 32
    +9
    In the current period, you shouldn't pay special attention to the announced dates ... it's time to get used to the fact that there is a "tendency" in the country to shift the dates "to the right"! According to the "timing", the T-14 should already be in service ... So ... "shake" - we'll see!
    1. The leader of the Redskins
      The leader of the Redskins 7 December 2020 12: 16
      +4
      I was about two years ago here at VO one figure, foaming at the mouth, told me that with my own eyes I had seen several times how a battalion of armature from a unit went out for a run-in! And his patriots added, and did not even ask where is this magical place? What a part, what a tankodro!
      1. Morglenn
        Morglenn 7 December 2020 14: 29
        +2
        Well, leavened patriots love to please each other with such news. I want to remind you that by 2020 the troops should already have 2300 armatures. Really in the leadership of the army and industry are balabols and builders of Potemkin villages. But this cannot be!
  11. tech3030
    tech3030 7 December 2020 10: 51
    -1
    Can Chemezov himself be sold? Such figures should be put in jail.
  12. Roman070280
    Roman070280 7 December 2020 11: 09
    +5
    An advertising campaign is currently underway.


    In my opinion, the article could be safely reduced to these lines ..
  13. maxim k.
    maxim k. 7 December 2020 12: 07
    -4
    After the appearance of the T-90M, Armata will only be like a tank in reserve, when the situation is generally unfavorable, or when it will be necessary to fight a high-tech enemy. I think that the total number of Armats in all aircraft will be no more than 150 pieces - the machine is very expensive to maintain, and in production.
  14. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 7 December 2020 12: 39
    0
    A beautiful car, but will we have enough money for tanks, helicopters, the navy, missiles, aircraft, and target designation systems? Most likely, tanks will be sacrificed from this list, so the modernized versions of the T-72 will pull the strap for quite some time.
  15. Ovsigovets
    Ovsigovets 7 December 2020 13: 25
    -1
    "but you can read the entire list, please" (C) I would very much like to hear plans and contracts from a responsible person with the prospect of deliveries for at least 5 years and the number of tanks
  16. pereselenec
    pereselenec 7 December 2020 13: 44
    +3
    Rostec told about the timing of serial deliveries to the troops of the T-14 "Armata"


    But the dates were named long ago - 2300 fittings until December last year. VO even wrote about this: https://topwar.ru/82516-na-vooruzhenie-rossiyskoy-armii-postupyat-2300-tankov-armata.html
    1. Kildin
      Kildin 8 December 2020 17: 24
      0
      And everyone has already forgotten about it. And they will forget about these promises. Well, or they will produce them in homeopathic quantities, 10-15 pieces per year.
  17. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 7 December 2020 13: 52
    +1
    Dear, raw and nothing at all. Envy in silence, we have the only tank in the world with no crew turret. Which went to the series. That the Russians know how to build tanks! fellow
  18. ficus2003
    ficus2003 7 December 2020 14: 08
    -1
    Title Ukhokruti will be delivered this year.
    The head of the ear-roll factory said that there will be ear-rolls this year.
    "Ukhokruti will be delivered this year" said the head of the factory.
    Let's remind, earlier it was promised that the hooks will be delivered this year.
    According to the state orders, the ukhkruts were to be delivered this year.
    Reference: domestically produced hooks are planned to begin production this year.
  19. t-12
    t-12 9 December 2020 01: 49
    -1
    02: 23, 15 September 2015
    The Russian army will receive 2300 tanks based on the Armata armored platform. Oleg Sienko, general director of the research and production corporation Uralvagonzavod, spoke about this on Monday, September 14, on the air of the Echo of Moscow radio.
    According to Sienko, the state armament program involves the supply of the army 2300 units of "Armata" until 2020
    1. noname1117
      noname1117 10 December 2020 00: 39
      0
      Can't you really see the difference between the 10 prototype and the running pipeline predictions?