The West is satisfied that Iran did not respond forcefully to the elimination of the atomic scientist
47
Western politicians do not hide their satisfaction with the fact that Iran did not respond by force to the elimination of the nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh.
Recall that the man who is called "the father of the Iranian atomic bomb" died a few days ago after being ambushed by his motorcade in the suburbs of Tehran. Iran then said that "they will not leave it like that", but after a few days the forceful response, which many expected, did not follow.
In this regard, statements by experts began to appear in the Western media regarding "Iran's obvious desire to wait for the change of the owner of the White House." It was noted that the Iranian elites are aware of the provocative nature of the liquidation of a well-known scientist in Iran. The provocation was calculated to make Iran show "military teeth", after which no one in the United States, including Joe Biden, would have any desire to return to the deal with Tehran on the "nuclear issue". Now the question of a possible return of the United States to the deal is being discussed more and more actively.
Against this background, Saudi Arabia said that "consultations with the Gulf states will be needed if the US decides to return to a deal with Iran." At the same time, the Saudi monarchy notes that for them "the issue of expanding the deal with Iran is important not only at the expense of the Gulf countries, but also at the expense of the number of points of this very deal."
From the statement:
Due to the missile threat that exists against Saudi Arabia, because of the missile attacks by pro-Iranian forces on objects from Yemen, it is necessary to press Iran to abandon both nuclear development and the development of missile weapons.
Iran has not yet commented on these statements of Riyadh.
Twitter / Iranian Foreign Ministry
Our news channels
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)
“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"
Information