NKR authorities appreciated the idea of ​​creating a Russian military base in Karabakh

73
NKR authorities appreciated the idea of ​​creating a Russian military base in Karabakh

The authorities of the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic positively assessed the expansion of the Russian peacekeeping mission and the creation of a permanent Russian military base on the territory of the NKR. About this in an interview with RIA News told the adviser to the NKR President on foreign policy David Babayan

According to him, the deployment of a Russian military base in Karabakh could serve to strengthen security and stability in the NKR in the long term.



(...) I believe that it would be very good to have a Russian base here (...) Russia has a very powerful geopolitical potential. But what if Turkey starts pushing Azerbaijan towards aggression? And if the militants leave Turkey's subordination and decide to do something here? In this case, they may deliberately try to inflict a blow on Russia's image, not to mention putting us in a very difficult position in terms of security.

he said, adding that the deployment of a Russian military base would be "an appropriate step."

At the same time, the politician believes, even the current number of Russian military personnel is sufficient to consolidate Moscow's role in the region. According to him, Russia's mission is divided into two components: military and political. From a military point of view, an increase in the number of peacekeepers is preferable. Politically, even the presence of one Russian peacekeeper is already a sign of Russia's presence in the region.


    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    73 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +8
      3 December 2020 11: 10
      Well, that's the Russian profit! Russian and not Turkish Base in Karabakh! The Armenians had to jump less and spit in the direction of Russia, you look and the territories would have been preserved.
      1. +7
        3 December 2020 11: 38
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Well, that's the Russian profit! Russian and not Turkish Base in Karabakh! The Armenians had to jump less and spit in the direction of Russia, you look and the territories would have been preserved.

        two bases nearby? request so-so "profit". logistics, money. Again, the "spitting" will subside, and the Turks got rid of it, I think one base is enough, but to re-equip it with high quality, yes. (The opinion is private, minuses are welcome.)
        1. -3
          3 December 2020 12: 01
          Quote: Aerodrome
          minuses are welcome.)

          Why argue with "hurray for the patriots ?!" No words, some minuses. laughing
          The dispute does not work due to the lack of arguments
          1. -6
            3 December 2020 14: 03
            Sylvester, please note - the all-consuming minus sculpts just like from a machine gun ... by the way, you are "well done" in this regard, you are working fruitfully. I didn’t put a minus on the airfield if you contact me, and neither do you. While I went to the training ground, yours distinguished themselves well ... well, the same to you. By the way, do you write down all those who disagree with you in "hurray patriots"
            Airfield, what is there to discuss? Karabakh is a part of the South Caucasus bordering on Iran, Azerbaijan, Armenia. A small part of the Caucasus (most of it is Russia) allows you to control neighboring states. I can't say about the expediency of the Base on the territory of Armenia, but the Base in Karabakh is Geopolitics!
            1. 0
              3 December 2020 17: 32
              Quote: Hunter 2
              Sylvester, please note - the all-consuming minus sculpts just like from a machine gun ... by the way, you are "well done" in this regard, you are working fruitfully.

              I also just arrived, and as for the downsides, after our pick on 30.11.20/4/XNUMX in the "Color Revolution ..." XNUMX thousand blew off me - so it was not you laughing
              As I understand it, you took revenge on me for your capture laughing
              Holy you laughing наш
              1. -5
                3 December 2020 17: 44
                Quote: Silvestr

                I also just arrived, and as for the downsides, after our pick on 30.11.20/4/XNUMX in the "Color Revolution ..." XNUMX thousand blew off me - so it was not you laughing
                As I understand it, you took revenge on me for your capture laughing
                Holy you laughing наш

                Sylvester, at least you have a Brain - it really works wrong ... laughing I have - 4 thousand blows every day ... well, just don't need that you are not in business wink can we ask Vadim for a printout together? laughing Your whole party - communicates outside the site, makes - joint decisions ... Children, by God. You are needed while you are chatting, there is no harm from you ... well, only "hypothetically" - someone hears your calls, and will try to learn something - do not speak later, I am not guilty ... wink
                1. -1
                  3 December 2020 19: 32
                  Quote: Hunter 2
                  it's not my fault ...

                  is there a catch?
                  1. 0
                    3 December 2020 20: 05
                    Provocateur Sylvester! Why would a buoy (a float reinforced to the bottom) pull words out of context? Yes, there is a catch ... nothing but headaches brings. Vacuum cleaner in terms of money. But there are no Poachers and the Hunt is Beautiful.
        2. -1
          5 December 2020 10: 06
          in this case, we can say that it will be "one" base, subordination should be made in Gyumri, and taking into account that there will be mainly motorized rifles, this will be a reinforcing component ... logically it would be nice to break through the French through the recognition of Artsakh and negotiate with it
      2. +13
        3 December 2020 11: 38
        According to the agreement, the peacekeepers are there for a maximum of 5 years. The entire international community, including Russia, recognizes this territory as part of Azerbaijan. So it is not entirely correct assumption about some kind of base on the part of the representatives of Armenia. They pass off wishful thinking, as always. another hemorrhoid? We do not have to solve their problems for everyone.
        1. 0
          3 December 2020 11: 46
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          So it is not entirely correct assumption about some kind of base on the part of the representatives of Armenia.

          I probably misunderstood something, it seems it is written that the representatives of the NKR authorities. Or is it Armenia?
          1. +8
            3 December 2020 11: 51
            What's the difference whose fantasies are they?
        2. 0
          3 December 2020 11: 49
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          Under the agreement, the peacekeepers are there for a maximum of 5 years. The entire international community, including Russia, recognizes this territory as part of Azerbaijan.

          This is usually forgotten by some because they
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          Wishful thinking as always

          Real politics has long gone from slogans and "uryakaloks" into a practical plane - "what will we get from this?"
          For now only
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          another hemorrhoid
        3. +6
          3 December 2020 15: 14
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          According to the agreement, the peacekeepers are there for a maximum of 5 years. The entire international community, including Russia, recognizes this territory as part of Azerbaijan. So it is not entirely correct assumption about some kind of base on the part of the representatives of Armenia. They pass off wishful thinking, as always. another hemorrhoid? We do not have to solve their problems for everyone.

          Armenia, and even more so, NPOs are now not in the status to make such proposals. And they asked Azerbaijan? Those will clearly be against such a base. It is easier for them to drag the Turks there. And on the legal side, their positions are stronger.
      3. +4
        3 December 2020 11: 44
        Quote: Hunter 2
        The Armenians had to jump less and spit in the direction of Russia, you look and the territories would have been preserved.

        It was like the saying "You can't be cute by force."
      4. +7
        3 December 2020 11: 46
        ... In his words, the deployment of a Russian military base in Karabakh could serve to strengthen security and stability in the NKR in the long term.

        If only Azerbaijan does not ask to leave its territory in 5 years. And according to international law, Karabakh is Azerbaijan. So the desire of this master does not mean anything. The key is in Baku
        1. +8
          3 December 2020 13: 45
          Quote: Silvestr
          If only Azerbaijan does not ask to leave its territory in 5 years. And according to international law, Karabakh is Azerbaijan.

          They will ask the fastest. Last Sunday I visited my classmate Takhir at the dacha, under a glass instead of the usual conversations "about herring" they started talking about Karabakh and Azerbaijan. He asks "Well, what are the Russians doing in Azerbaijan, we ourselves can prevent conflicts, and the locals do not like the presence of their soldiers." And what to answer?
          I told him "Tahir, you and I do not live there, we do not know the situation, and it is not for us to decide."
          On that, they decided, without raising this conversation, and, as always, switched to their own maritime theme, to Azerbaijani kebabs and Russian vodka.
      5. +5
        3 December 2020 20: 33
        According to him, the deployment of a Russian military base in Karabakh could serve to strengthen security and stability in the NKR in the long term.

        Are you serious about thoughts from the presidential advisor
        unrecognized, crushed education? After the unambiguous statements of Vladimir Putin and the Russian Foreign Ministry on the belonging of Karabakh to Azerbaijan? After the conclusion of a tripartite agreement in which these "high-ranking" clowns were not even mentioned?
        Are you shielding that someone (after this war) will go down not even to listening, but to listening to their nonsense about the territory of the NKR?
      6. +1
        4 December 2020 00: 18
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Well, that's the Russian profit!

        In what?
        Russian and not Turkish Base in Karabakh!

        what is the base? and why the hell does the Russian Federation need it there?
        The Turks will have WB in Nakhichevan and in the Caspian ...
        The former "Great" peoples of the Caucasus, only as part of the Republic of Ingushetia / USSR, existed carefree, and now the Armenians themselves do not need Armenia, so why should a Russian be closer to Armenia than the Armenians themselves?
    2. +4
      3 December 2020 11: 14
      The current mind would have been at least half a year ago. No wonder they say: "Broken two unbeaten more expensive."
      1. +11
        3 December 2020 12: 02
        Quote: newbie
        The current mind would have been at least half a year ago. No wonder they say: "Broken two unbeaten more expensive."

        Six months ago, Russia and especially its army were not treated friendly.
        1. +1
          3 December 2020 12: 19
          I do not recommend that you really trust and entrust your mind to this handful of well-paid grand-eaters who have convinced some lost sheep. Although, the picture is "good", promoted.
          1. +8
            3 December 2020 13: 57
            Quote: newbie

            0
            I do not recommend trusting and entrusting your mind to this handful of well-paid grand-eaters,

            I would be glad not to believe the "grenadiers", but several years ago I had several "gaster" from Martuni. They did not talk to me about "life", but listened to their conversations with our Russians (and we do not live in Russia), then I heard "What are Russian soldiers doing in Armenia?" But when one dropped the phrase "Russian soldiers will be Dokele ...." In general, I sent them to the homeland of their ancestors.
            1. +4
              3 December 2020 13: 59
              They did the right thing by sending them. And people like that and I have met_ victims of ignorance of either history or geography.
              1. +2
                3 December 2020 14: 06
                Quote: newbie
                And people like that and I have met_ victims of ignorance of either history or geography.

                And the history must not be forgotten, and now she has once again made a reminder. They will understand, good. They will not understand, they live.
                1. 0
                  3 December 2020 18: 05
                  They will understand. You want to live.
                  1. +2
                    3 December 2020 18: 44
                    Quote: newbie
                    They will understand. You want to live.

                    I want to live when the pistol is at my head, and as soon as the pistol is removed, only a few understand that it can be brought back and forth.
                    1. 0
                      3 December 2020 19: 49
                      I repeat: "For one beaten, two unbeaten give." And those who do not know their problems.
        2. +3
          3 December 2020 13: 43
          I read the slogan in the photo and I catch myself thinking that it turns out -Russian Army -Warrior of Armenia ... They have everything in Armenia through the backside. Even the slogan could not be written normally. So it turns out that Russia is the only Warrior in Armenia!
          1. +3
            3 December 2020 14: 08
            Quote: 30 vis
            So it turns out that Russia is the only Warrior in Armenia!

            Rather, the defender of Armenia.
            1. +33
              3 December 2020 17: 44
              Quote: tihonmarine
              Rather, the defender of Armenia.

              But you must?
              Russia's influence on world politics exists on paid talk shows of state channels, but the real Russian politics in the region, especially in the absence of common borders, is much more realistic. The domination of Russia in the post-Soviet space is a good thing, but the cost of making this dream a reality is too high. It is a luxury, not a "vehicle" to the national development goals of the country. The end results of Russia's actions in Ukraine, Georgia, and Belarus led to a rethinking of the role of the dominant and the role of the post-Soviet space.
              1. +3
                3 December 2020 18: 42
                Quote: Overlock
                But you must?

                I do not know. But I know one thing - "you can't warm others with your body."
                1. +32
                  3 December 2020 18: 44
                  Quote: tihonmarine
                  But I know one thing - "you cannot warm others with your body."

                  especially if you warm the snake
                  1. +1
                    3 December 2020 20: 19
                    Quote: Overlock
                    especially if you warm the snake

                    Even if it’s not a snake, you warmed him up, fed him, and he spat in your bucket of water.
    3. 0
      3 December 2020 11: 16
      placing a Russian military base would be an "appropriate step"
      It's good that they understand this, in contrast to the loud ones on the square in Yerevan. For the West, our peacekeepers (not to mention a possible base) are like a bone in the throat. Therefore, Macron tried so diligently to neutralize our contribution to stopping the war in Karabakh, and the United States has already begun to accuse Russia of expansion.
    4. -2
      3 December 2020 11: 26
      Yes, it's high time to base not only there, but around the world it's time to stick around like they don't like to give a shit
      1. 0
        3 December 2020 11: 30
        "It's time to poke around the world" - and who will pay? Are you personally?
      2. 0
        3 December 2020 11: 40
        Quote: opuonmed
        Yes, it's high time to base not only there, but around the world it's time to stick around like they don't like to give a shit

        and there are ready to pay? it will definitely come "for the warmth", but not the sechin and the redhead with vekselbergs.
    5. +9
      3 December 2020 11: 26
      A strange statement about the location of a Russian military base. Firstly, this is the territory of Azerbaijan and only Russia and Azerbaijan can decide the question of the base. Secondly, this statement is a provocative stuffing in order to create tension between Russia and Azerbaijan. And thirdly, who is the so-called government of Nagorno-Karabakh? None. The time will come and they will answer for everything.
      1. -12
        3 December 2020 11: 41
        Quote: Ramiz Babayev
        Firstly, this is the territory of Azerbaijan

        this is a controversial territory, it must be recognized and formalized.
        1. +9
          3 December 2020 11: 50
          This is not a disputed territory. Even Armenia does not recognize this NKR. But all countries of the world, including Russia, consider this territory an integral part of Azerbaijan. Don't compose.
        2. +33
          3 December 2020 17: 48
          Quote: Aerodrome
          this is a controversial territory, it must be recognized and formalized.

          UN recognizes Nagorno-Karabakh as an integral part of Azerbaijan - UN General Assembly resolution of December 21, 2001
      2. +1
        3 December 2020 13: 24
        Quote: Ramiz Babayev
        A strange statement about the location of a Russian military base. Firstly, this is the territory of Azerbaijan and only Russia and Azerbaijan can decide the question of the base. Secondly, this statement is a provocative stuffing in order to create tension between Russia and Azerbaijan. And thirdly, who is the so-called government of Nagorno-Karabakh? None. The time will come and they will answer for everything.

        You are absolutely right, the peacekeepers of the Russian Federation are there so that there are no provocations from both sides, and not to protect the Armenians, and certainly not by agreement with the "heads" of Karabakh.
    6. -7
      3 December 2020 11: 27
      And why then this NKR will not hold a referendum in the manner of the Crimean? Oh, they don't want it, terribly independent yes. So they are generally unnecessary. By the elections to zero, the question will arise about the dispersal of the army of its people, provided that the terribly effective reforms in the Russian Federation continue.
      1. -4
        3 December 2020 11: 43
        Quote: evgen1221
        And why then this NKR will not hold a referendum in the manner of the Crimean? Oh, they don't want it, terribly independent yes. So they are generally unnecessary. By the elections to zero, the question will arise about the dispersal of the army of its people, provided that the terribly effective reforms in the Russian Federation continue.

        it was difficult, but I got it.
      2. +3
        3 December 2020 12: 06
        saucepan does not interfere?)
    7. +2
      3 December 2020 11: 32
      Of course, I am not a strategist or even a tactician, but it seems to ME that from a military point of view, this base makes no sense for Russia. Whom and from whom will we protect there? Russia from the Turks? There is no common border between us. Armenians from Turks? Let them defend themselves .. The Armenians can be understood - security from the Turks. But why do we need it?
      1. +3
        3 December 2020 12: 07
        to the account of Turrk Armenia in the CSTO
      2. 0
        3 December 2020 13: 27
        Read the history and you will understand why the Republic of Ingushetia was constantly harnessed to the Caucasus and more than once expelled the Turks from there.
    8. +2
      3 December 2020 11: 39
      It doesn't bother Armenians to remember their antics, I politely call them their demands to expel our military base from Armenia, their anti-Russian actions. And when the war came close by, right there, albeit for a while, they began to use the head for its intended purpose, that is, to think with it. And they realized that without Russia Armenia will not last long, this is evidenced by the lack of help from the best friends of Pashinyan and many Armenians, from Soros and from the Yankees!
    9. +2
      3 December 2020 11: 43
      "The NKR authorities" - no authority exists anymore.
    10. +1
      3 December 2020 11: 43
      Here is the map of Karabakh after the section.
      The Armenians have a piece in the middle that is not geographically connected with Armenia.
    11. -4
      3 December 2020 11: 49
      The NKR parliament will vote on giving the Russian language in Karabakh as the second state language. My predictions are coming true that Russia will ultimately "squeeze" Karabakh both from Armenia (de facto) and Azerbaijan (de jure, by holding a referendum on joining Russia as a subject of Russia in a couple of years). laughing
      1. 0
        3 December 2020 11: 57
        Russia will never take this step, not enough Georgia and Ukraine? Moreover, there is no common border with Karabakh
        1. -2
          3 December 2020 12: 25
          There is no common border in Sudan either, but there will be a base. In such matters, the main thing is the attitude of the local. In Karabakh, Russia is doing everything to win their sympathy and she will achieve her goal. fellow
          1. +1
            3 December 2020 19: 24
            Quote: maxim k.
            In Karabakh, Russia is doing everything to win their sympathy and it will achieve its goal

            will hand out beads?
            1. -1
              4 December 2020 10: 11
              Do you consider the Karabakh people as Indians ???
      2. +2
        3 December 2020 12: 09
        Ossetia and Abkhazia were not included, but here is a piece of a mountain surrounded, why?
        1. -5
          3 December 2020 13: 50
          NOT YET entered ....
      3. +31
        3 December 2020 17: 50
        Quote: maxim k.
        My predictions are coming true that Russia will ultimately "squeeze" Karabakh from both Armenia (de facto) and Azerbaijan (de jure, by holding a referendum in a couple of years on joining Russia as a subject).

        Russian fiction
        1. -1
          4 December 2020 10: 12
          Tell it to Assad laughing
    12. +2
      3 December 2020 11: 58
      Who appreciated the idea of ​​creating a database? The authorities of Karabakh? Who are they? By and large, their republic is no longer there, which means that they are nobody! "King without a kingdom"
      1. -1
        4 December 2020 10: 13
        And in today's world, who is asking whom? The main thing is that the population will be prepared for this by REAL deeds - medical care, construction, etc.
    13. +3
      3 December 2020 12: 15
      To the NKR authorities, what kind of "beast" is this?
    14. +2
      3 December 2020 12: 32
      the impression is that most likely the demarcation zone along the border between turkey and george will be expanded ... it would be great ... only the Armenians are not reliable people
    15. +1
      3 December 2020 19: 26
      Stand with a firm foot in the Caucasus ...
    16. 0
      8 December 2020 13: 04
      = What if the militants leave Turkey's subordination and decide to do something here? In this case, they may deliberately try to inflict a blow on the image of Russia, not to mention putting us in a very difficult position in terms of security =
      The Armenian comrade says everything correctly, except for a blow to Russia's image.
      Well, the Armenian comrade, you have to pay for safety. At least to a minimum - to feed the Russian soldiers. Dress, shoe and arm, so be it, Russia will
      1. 0
        8 December 2020 14: 45
        David Babayan, adviser to the NKR president on foreign policy, told RIA Novosti about this in an interview.

        and, THIS COMMODITY - WHO ?????
        The agreement was signed by Pashinyan ... Do you take seriously the verbal anonism of this clown ??????
        1. 0
          8 December 2020 18: 35
          Quote: VyacheSeymour
          and, THIS COMMODITY - WHO ?????

          If you read through the line, then - the adviser to the NKR president. If he said this in the media, it means that such thoughts do not cause displeasure in the NKR President, let's say, this is at least.
          1. 0
            8 December 2020 22: 21
            No, I read it normally ... The agreement was signed by Pashinyan, the Prime Minister of Armenia ... So I ask: - Who are these clowns? Who are they to evaluate something positively or negatively? How are they to find the Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh?
            PS
            Leaving aside the meaningless opinions of these
            "leaders" - what is the relationship of a peacekeeping force with a limited time mandate, with a package of powers agreed by the three parties, to the establishment of a military base?
            1. 0
              8 December 2020 22: 44
              Quote: VyacheSeymour
              No, I read it fine ... The agreement was signed by Pashinyan - Prime Minister of Armenia ... So I ask: - who are these clowns? Who are they to

              What does Pashinyan have to do with the NKR? Armenia recognized NKR? - No.
              Did the Armenian army fight? - No. Pashinyan signed an agreement as the prime minister of the country that seized 7 regions of Azerbaijan and with this agreement pledged to return the occupied lands to Azerbaijan. That's it, his mission ended there. And the NKR, although not recognized by anyone, has its own government and president and has the right to resolve issues of its security without looking back at the Pashinyans and other figures.
              1. 0
                9 December 2020 10: 24
                What does Pashinyan have to do with the NKR?

                And the words of Pashinyan, which brought down the negotiation process: - "Karabakh - Armenia dot." ?
                Armenia recognized NKR?

                And what to recognize after his categorical statement?
                By the way, in order to recognize the NKR, he would have to rewrite the Constitution, where Karabakh is registered as a part of Armenia - one of the reasons for the anonism of the Armenian Parliament with recognition-non-recognition!
                And the NKR, although not recognized by anyone, has its own government and president and has the right to resolve issues of its security without looking back at the Pashinyans and other figures


                Yes, no. It is the issues of their security that they have no right to decide, being, according to the same V.V. Putin, an integral part of Azerbaijan, being not a subject, but an object of agreements! Russia is one
                from the parties - the signatory, the guarantor of three third-party agreements - that is, and a model of their implementation!
                Did the Armenian army fight? - No. Pashinyan signed an agreement as the prime minister of the country that seized 7 regions of Azerbaijan and with this agreement pledged to return the occupied lands to Azerbaijan.

                So did it fight or not, as the side that seized the territories and, in fact, capitulation, pledged to return the seized lands? Lost twice as many military personnel as the Karabakh people?
                Lost Tornadoes, Solntsepeki, Torah, Elbrus, Tochki, W-80, C-300, Jordan Wasps, AKM, radar, electronic warfare equipment ... - many other equipment that the unrecognized simply could not acquire just as unrecognized, which (in such quantity) simply in view of the mobility and the number of personnel (directly related to the size of the available population) simply did not have the opportunity
                exploit? And why exactly the Armenian armed forces entered the territory of the non-warring Armenia, and did not stay in their own Karabakh?
                So, it's not up to them to decide - everything has already been decided for them! That's what depends on them is to try to properly dispose of Russian humanitarian aid, to avoid excesses when the Azerbaijanis return (which is written in the agreement), and they were initially categorically opposed to this and the guarantor of which is
                peacekeepers, as well as for returning Armenians! Try to integrate into Azerbaijan’s realities ... because Azerbaijan has declared and is declaring that it will invest in the restoration of the region without dividing into Armenians and Azerbaijanis. As far as I know, there are 6 seats in the Azerbaijani parliament, but in fact there are only 125 MPs - one mandate for all the years of the conflict is reserved for the Armenian representative of Karabakh.
                1. 0
                  9 December 2020 13: 12
                  Quote: VyacheSeymour

                  By the way, in order to recognize the NKR, he would have to rewrite the Constitution, where Karabakh is registered as a part of Armenia

                  On what basis is NKAO a part of Armenia? NKAO has been a part of AZERBAIJAN since 1923. And before writing this into the constitution, it was necessary to recognize the independence of the NKR (a republic, not an autonomous region), and only then, by referendum, include it in Armenia.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"