Military Review

"Deliberately sought the expulsion of the MiG-29 from the country's air force": the Bulgarian prosecutor's office accuses the former defense minister

35

The Bulgarian prosecutor's office is seeking a conviction against former Defense Minister Nikolai Nenchev, who headed the country's military department in 2014-2017. The prosecution was allegedly triggered by deliberate failure to act to eliminate combat power aviation.


As Altair explains, in November 2016, Nenchev signed an agreement with the Russian side, providing for the supply of 10 engines for the MiG-29, including 4 new and 6 repaired. They were supposed to be handed over by April 30, 2017 and would allow five fighters to resume flights.

He did not fulfill his official duties and did not care about the safety of the MiG-29 fighters and their ability to perform combat missions
- says the materials of the prosecutor's office.

As noted, Nenchev tried in every possible way to disrupt the deal with Russia, instructing his deputy not to take any action and blocking the transfer of funds to pay for the engines. The prosecutor's office believes that by doing so, the Minister of Defense intended to achieve the exclusion of the MiG-29 from the country's air force.

It is indicative that at present the Bulgarian side is demanding from Russia to comply with the terms of the contract for power plants and is threatening with lawsuits and penalties for disrupting supplies.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Thrifty
    Thrifty 3 December 2020 05: 21
    +20
    Did the Bulgarians pay for the delivery of engines and aircraft repair? They can now demand from the new owner of the white house of the United States, so that he does not forget about the existence of such a country on the world map, and Russia must be asked, believing his wishes with a payment with the specified amount of money transferred for the engines.
    1. BDRM 667
      BDRM 667 3 December 2020 06: 48
      +6
      Nenchev tried in every possible way to disrupt the deal with Russia, instructing his deputy not to take any action and blocking the transfer of funds to pay for the engines. The prosecutor's office believes that by doing so, the Minister of Defense intended to achieve the exclusion of the MiG-29 from the country's air force.


      Quote: Mityasha
      They paid to discredit Russia and supply their planes. Nothing personal just business.


      Exactly - exactly yes
      "Cleared the field" for contracts for the supply of American cars.
      1. antivirus
        antivirus 3 December 2020 11: 57
        -1
        what harmful Bulgarians are.
        this is the tail that twists its NATO nose.
    2. Raven 95
      Raven 95 3 December 2020 10: 30
      +8
      Did the Bulgarians pay for the delivery of engines and aircraft repair?

      That is, under the contract, the Russian Federation must maintain the combat readiness of the Bulgarian Air Force, intended according to the NATO doctrine, for striking the Russian Federation. belay
      No, I understand everything. Capitalism. Loot drives. But the head then behind the shoulders should be present.
      1. pytar
        pytar 4 December 2020 11: 26
        0
        That is, under the contract, the Russian Federation must maintain the combat readiness of the Bulgarian Air Force, intended according to the NATO doctrine, for striking the Russian Federation.

        How can a MiG-29 produced in '85, and having a range not reaching the Russian Federation, can "strike at the Russian Federation" ??? belay
        No, I understand everything. Capitalism. Loot drives. But the head then behind the shoulders should be present.

        So take and declare sanctions, do not repair Soviet equipment, which is full in countries b. ATS! Why do you need money from the hated West? Are you a "self-sufficient country"? fellow
    3. The comment was deleted.
  2. Mityasha
    Mityasha 3 December 2020 05: 30
    +7
    In principle, everything is pretty simple for American money. They paid to discredit Russia and supply their planes. Nothing personal just business.
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 3 December 2020 05: 58
      +4
      "out of sight, out of mind". grateful "brothers" ...
      1. Lech from Android.
        Lech from Android. 3 December 2020 06: 17
        +9
        "brothers" ...
        What a beautiful word ... twice the country of these brothers participated in the war against us ... now NATO is preparing for the third war against us ... in which it will simply be ordered to participate ... they will make an offer that cannot be refused.
        1. pytar
          pytar 4 December 2020 00: 55
          -2
          NATO is preparing for the third war against us ...

          Take it easy! There will be no war! fellow Do you know why? For several sooooo weighty reasons! Of them there are many, I will give only 3, but they are enough!
          1.The war between NATO and the Russian Federation will blow up the entire planet, yours and Western oligarchs will lose all the accumulated colossal wealth!
          2.The West already has Russian natural resources. Hundreds of billions of dollars are flowing out of Russia continuously ... No one is mad enough to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs!
          3. Western capitalists will lose their investments in the Russian Federation, and Russian capitalists in the West! They are khoroshenko intertwined in symbiosis! At the expense of ordinary Russians who believe that "now NATO will attack"! Your "calibers", "poseidons", etc. "tax-free in the world"for you, not for nato! So that your patriotic fervor does not fade away, so that you do not look at what is happening around! And all sorts of American wunderfaffe are created mainly to replenish the bottomless pockets of corporations. It’s so simple! laughing
        2. pytar
          pytar 4 December 2020 14: 11
          0
          brothers "... What a beautiful word ...

          Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language:
          BROTHERS, BROTHERS, ed. brother, brothers, husband. colloquial obsolete.) ironic instead of the expression brothers-Slavs (about the southern Slavs in the era of the Russian-Turkish war of 1877-78).
      2. pytar
        pytar 3 December 2020 23: 53
        0
        "out of sight, out of mind". grateful "brothers" ...

        Recently, a drunken Russian knocked down a local from a car in Bulgaria. Do you think all Russians are like that?
    2. pytar
      pytar 4 December 2020 11: 34
      -2
      Quote: Mityasha
      In principle, everything is pretty simple for American money. They paid to discredit Russia and supply their planes. Nothing personal just business.


      Yeah ... in everything "Americans are to blame"! lol And different there "effective manager" Ross. companies, honest, honest, straight saints! laughing And they build spaceports, all sorts of obyykty, contracts are executed correctly, right on time, they do not steal any money! Well done! fellow
      1. Mityasha
        Mityasha 4 December 2020 12: 49
        -1
        And why such indignation. Well, they build, steal as elsewhere. Only where is this? In your case, this is a deliberate action in order to switch to the planes of another country, where you are drawn with such force. For you, Russian now is the worst thing from the technical and ideological side. Yes? wink
        And who are you monsieur to tell me about ignorance?
        1. pytar
          pytar 4 December 2020 14: 01
          0
          Why such indignation ...

          You should read the comments and show no further than your ignorance! Okay, you made me ... yes
          ... in your case, this is a deliberate action ...

          What evidence do you have? Are you the prosecutor, the judge in this case? All charges against the prosecutor's office are based on the testimony of Nenchev's deputy, Assoc. Dr. Desislava Yosifova. It is known that shortly before, there were several scandals on a personal basis between her and the minister. By the way, Associate Professor Yosifova is a specialist at the Institute of Economics and Finance, MIIT, Russia! Which gave reason to suspect her of contract activities in favor of Ross. company! The first-rate judge rejected the arguments of the prosecution against Neichev. The case is to be pronounced by the Supreme Court of Cassation.
          ... to switch to planes of another country ...

          The transition to equipment according to NATO standards has been stipulated in the state program since 2004. And RSK MiG and the Polish WZL-2 and WZL-4 competed in the repair of MiG-ah engines! So, whoever repaired them MiGs remain instantly produced in the USSR!
          The contract with the RKS MiG was preliminary, preliminary, conditional! At the same time there were negotiations from Poland. And since the Polish offer was worth 300 thousand euros. (for each engine) cheaper than RSK, Parliament with 130 MPs, against 41 AGAINST, voted for signing the final agreement with Poland!
          You can read the answers to all the questions asked and comparing the offers of RSK MiG and WZL-2 / WZL-4 here:
          https://www.mod.bg/bg/doc/tema/20151202_QA_MIG29.pdf
          Obviously, in all respects RSC was losing. hi
          For you, what is Russian now is the worst from the technical and ideological side.

          What is the "ideology"? Russia is a capitalist state, market relations, competition!
          When we receive favorable offers from the Russian side. companies, give them orders! Recently, the repair of the T-72 was signed, and our aircraft repair plants, as subcontractors, receive orders for the repair of Mi-24 / Avganistan / from the Russian side. company! "Balkan Stream" is also being built by Ross. subcontractors, I meet regularly with Ross. colleagues, everything is fine!
          And who are you monsieur to tell me about ignorance?

          So you realized how deep it is and how baseless your confidence is? request
          1. Mityasha
            Mityasha 4 December 2020 20: 31
            0
            I might have agreed with your arguments, having read more, but your defiant bad manners to speak of ignorance to a stranger in the first answer puts an end to our further communication. I have the honor!
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 3 December 2020 06: 16
    +12
    Nenchev tried in every possible way to disrupt the deal with Russia
    There are enough of such Nenchevs in Bulgaria. An example of this is South Stream in due time and the delay in the construction of the Turkish Stream branch. How many other agreements have been thwarted through the fault of the Bulgarian side?
    the Bulgarian side requires Russia to comply with the terms of the power plant contract and threatens lawsuits and penalties for disrupting supplies.
    An interesting twist. As I understand it, the payment was not made through the fault of their defense minister, but they threaten the Russian side with a forfeit. Political zagulina or deliberate attempt to once again spoil the already not very good relationship?
    1. Avior
      Avior 3 December 2020 06: 55
      +5
      It is necessary to watch the features of the contract.
      Month there was an article about it
      In the discussion, the Bulgarians wrote that the problem is that the repair will actually cost the plant more than it was calculated, and the price in the contract is approved, and the Bulgarians do not agree to change it
      1. stalki
        stalki 3 December 2020 07: 45
        +3
        It is necessary to watch the features of the contract.
        Month there was an article about it
        In the discussion, the Bulgarians wrote that the problem is that the repair will actually cost the plant more than it was calculated, and the price in the contract is approved, and the Bulgarians do not agree to change it
        Yes, but usually in such agreements the conditions for changing the contract are revised, or the procedure for the parties to act in case of failure to fulfill the obligations of one of the participants. I think the Bulgarians just want to "eat a fish and not get a bone"
        1. Avior
          Avior 3 December 2020 10: 51
          +3
          The Bulgarians then wrote that Bulgaria agreed to more expensive repairs, provided that the cost under the contract did not change.
          There it was a question of the fact that the cost of some spare parts turned out to be more expensive than the plant had expected.
          And how is it written in the contract - who knows?
          1. pytar
            pytar 4 December 2020 00: 37
            +1
            Dear Sergey hi , the article is unsigned here, and lets readers down. The old tendency for VO, unfortunately. hi Spit on the Bulgarians again, for some there is a hobby ...
            We are talking about two completely different cases! We recently discussed that case at VO:
            https://topwar.ru/176188-obojdemsja-bez-mig-29-v-bolgarii-o-sorvannom-rossiej-remonte-istrebitelej.html
            The contract for the overhaul of the MiG-29 from 2018.

            And Nenchev is on trial, for 2 other contracts concluded in 2015.

            I will give some explanations on the case with Nenkov!
            1. No violation of contracts on the part of Bulgaria! For the reason that the very signing of the contract does not always mean automatic execution! Often there are many preconditions that each party can refuse, so the contract is not enforced! In the given case RSK MiG did not judge Bulgaria, since there is no reason for this.
            2. Nenchev is judged by the Bulgarian prosecutor's office, for the reason that he considers his actions / inaction harmful to the state! Keep in mind that the charges are not yet proven. Shas case will look in the videoconferencing.
            3. The very fact that the Prosecutor's Office in Bulgaria brings charges against the highest state officials speaks of the current system of separation of powers. Recently there was even a request to investigate President Radev himself. Former Minister Nenchev was a Moscow region under the current government of Premier Boyko Borisov. Because of the accusations / unproven so far / Nenchev, on his own initiative, filed for abandonment and appeared in court. And some other countries ... well, you remember Serdyukov! wink
            1. Avior
              Avior 4 December 2020 01: 11
              +1
              Thanks for the information.
              The old tendency for VO, unfortunately.

              I agree with you, unfortunately.
              The article misleads the reader, and this does not benefit the VO. sad
          2. pytar
            pytar 4 December 2020 01: 31
            +1
            Nenchev, on his own initiative, filed for resignation and appeared in court.

            One more chronological addition:
            Nikolay Nanchev was Minister of Defense since November 7 2014 to 26th of January 2017 ! The Sofia City Prosecutor's Office filed an indictment against him in the SFG 16th of January 2017!
            As you can see, Nenchev only 10 days, after filing the charge, filed for abandonment, as he himself states - "The accusations are unfounded, but the very fact of their presentation is a reason for me to leave it!" hi
        2. pytar
          pytar 4 December 2020 10: 34
          +1
          I think the Bulgarians just want to "eat a fish and not get a bone"

          Dear Sergey hi , a patriotic Russian is always inclined to think that "ours are so honest, but strangers are necessarily deceivers"! Why? Because our children, and others are strangers! lol
          How wrong you are, you can judge by how these “yours” treat you, Russian consumers inside Russia! Look, what a lion's share of contracts were thwarted, what a mad corruption, one Vostochny cosmodrome, what is it worth? And there are hundreds of such cases! Do you seriously believe that if Russian companies do this in Russia, outside will be more correct?
          Yes, but usually in such agreements the conditions for changing the contract, or the procedure for the parties to act in case of failure to fulfill the obligations of one of the participants, are revised.

          And there is! Replacement of some parts prescribed in the terms of reference for others is possible! But there is a detail! If the replacement is made at the request of the customer, and it is more expensive, the customer must pay the difference in price! But when the replacement is due to the fault of the performer / RSK MiG /, as in the case of that contract, the difference in price is calculated at his expense! After all, the executor can offer parts and 30 times more expensive, why should the customer have to pay more and more ??? You take and extrapolate such a situation in your everyday life, you yourself will understand how absurd this is!
      2. Pete mitchell
        Pete mitchell 3 December 2020 10: 07
        +1
        hi
        Quote: Avior
        It is necessary to watch the features of the contract

        This is of course without a doubt, but honestly it would be worth looking at this contract from the other side: who in general signed such a contract in '17? The situation was very clear. Or was it part of a larger deal
    2. pytar
      pytar 4 December 2020 00: 08
      +1
      And how many other agreements were thwarted through the fault of the Bulgarian side?

      Gennady, can you back up this statement of yours, with proof? Not from the mantra from rus-media, but from the facts?
      Keep in mind that non-compliance with contracts leads to court, and payment of compensation by the violator! I'll give you a little hint ... Only one contract was thwarted by the Bulgarian side, and by the decision of the international court 600 million euros, Russia. companies ....
      An interesting twist. As I understand it, the payment was not made through the fault of their defense minister, but they threaten the Russian side with a forfeit. Political zagulina or deliberate attempt to once again spoil the already not very good relationship?

      You have composed a "conclusion" based on the info that was presented to you. Unsigned article, source unknown. An orderly anti-Bulgarian thrust on the VO. Your logic does not suggest that something is wrong here? laughing
  4. faiver
    faiver 3 December 2020 07: 39
    +2
    the former Minister of Defense to be shot as an enemy of the Bulgarian people ... hi
    1. pytar
      pytar 4 December 2020 11: 05
      +1
      the former Minister of Defense to be shot as an enemy of the Bulgarian people ...

      You first shoot all Serdyukovs, Rogozins, Sechins, Milerovtsy, and so on. "effective managers", and we'll figure it out with Nenchev somehow! laughing
      1. faiver
        faiver 4 December 2020 11: 09
        0
        You first shoot all Serdyukovs, Rogozins, Sechins, Milerovtsy, and other "effective managers"
        - it won't work, we have the National Guard outnumbering the ground forces, this is how the authorities fear their people more than external enemies ...
        1. pytar
          pytar 4 December 2020 11: 41
          +1
          - it won't work, we have the National Guard outnumbering the ground forces, this is how the authorities fear their people more than external enemies ...

          Unfortunately, you are absolutely right! The Russian oligarchy / he is a lads from the world /, thoroughly took care of his immunity! By the way, ours, like yours! The same mentality, we are culturally close peoples! bully
  5. K-50
    K-50 3 December 2020 09: 08
    +2
    Did you transfer the money?
    If your ministers block the transfer of funds under a contract, what right do you have from others to demand its execution? belay
    First, sort it out, put things in order, then you can demand something from others !!!
    And then quietly and in a whisper! fellow fellow lol
    1. pytar
      pytar 4 December 2020 01: 15
      +1
      if your ministers block the transfer of funds by contract ...

      Is this proven? The primary judge rejected the charges against the prosecutor's office. Videoconferencing solution is coming!
      ... then what right do you have from others to demand its execution?

      The right is spelled out in contracts! This unsigned article clearly confused many members of the forum here!
      First, sort it out, put things in order ...

      This is how the former minister, from the current government, is judged by a personal friend of the current premier! What is this, if not putting things in order? So when you condemn Serdyukov / and he presented a medal / or Rogozin, then teach others how to put things in order!
      then you can demand something from others !!!

      You are wrong Alexey! The CUSTOMER not only can, he must according to the Bulgarian laws to require from the CONTRACTOR under the contract, performance! This is about the case of non-fulfillment by RSK MiG of the recently discussed contract for the overhaul of the MiG-29. But in the case of Nenchev, no default on the Bulgarian sidebecause contracts often provide for a pre-approval, and certain other preconditions. It is not the RSK MiG that blames Nencheva, but the Bulgarian prosecutor's office, for deliberately using this clause, causing damage to the combat capability of the Bulgarian Air Force! That is, this is a sugrubo internal Bulgarian affair, RSK has no legal claims!
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 3 December 2020 14: 25
    0
    Quote: faiver
    the former Minister of Defense to be shot as an enemy of the Bulgarian people ... hi

    laughing Shoot who? Small Bipod of the Colonial East India Company laughing
  8. Lena.72mail.ru
    Lena.72mail.ru 3 December 2020 14: 58
    +1
    "Brothers" in our repertoire, we owe them.
    1. pytar
      pytar 4 December 2020 11: 04
      +1
      "Brothers" in our repertoire, we owe them.

      What didn't please you again? Look, what a lion's share of contracts thwarted by these same Russian companies in Russia itself! How they "work" in Russia, and thus outside! They didn't learn otherwise!
  9. iouris
    iouris 3 December 2020 17: 00
    +2
    What can you say? What a bastard!