“Battle for the passes. Another look. " Myths and reality

12
“Battle for the passes. Another look. " Myths and reality

On July 12, 2016, my wife and I climbed Elbrus. He let him in (to the top) and let him go back down. This is not the case with everyone, given the lack of experience and early preparation. We were lucky, wildly.

Before climbing to the top, we grieved at the Maria shelter. Three days of forced acclimatization at an altitude of over 4000 meters. There was no weather.

Long conversations over a glass of tea with the guides of the orphanage about banditry rampant in the 90s on the passes bordering Georgia. About the war that plowed the local slopes. The corpses of German rangers were found even on the saddle of Elbrus.



The theme of the war was the main one in these conversations. We discussed everything. The death of the company of Lieutenant Grigoryants. We compared the level of training and equipment of our fighters and rangers from the Edelweiss division. Purposeful and overwhelmingly quick exit to Shelter 11 of Hauptmann Groth's group.

All came to a common opinion: there is nothing to be surprised at. In the pre-war years, German climbers in the Caucasus prowled like cockroaches in the kitchen. Prepared in advance. Photographed. We drew plans for the approaches to the passes. Well, how could you not believe that?

Hauptmann Grotto with his comrades (parteigenosse), like on a tram, came to the Hotu-Tau pass. He knew (the future knight of the German Cross in gold) where he was going and, most importantly, where he would eventually lead his group.

Four years have passed. And I stumble upon the announcement of Alexander Mirzonov's books “Battle for the Passes. Another look. "

Oops. A look at the war in the mountains from the side of the enemy. Incredibly interesting.

Reading the memoirs of the Germans is much more exciting than the same, but combed and emasculated by the Political Administration of the Red Army. To take or not to take? Who is the author? My age is a climber. I walked with my feet through the battlegrounds in the highlands. If for me the mountains are a pleasant episode, then for the author, apparently, the mountains are the hobby of his whole life. I take it. The book was sent quickly.

Impression? Shock. Immediately my ideas about mountain warfare collapsed. Much of what seemed unshakable has turned into myths. And there is nothing to argue! At first I tried to chuckle in disbelief. But after a couple of paragraphs, I realized that the author was right. Don't believe me?

Myth number 1. Excellent German maps


Excellent German maps. No, there was no doubt with Captain Groth. Before the war, he really went to Elbrus through the Khotu-Tau pass. And he didn't need maps on this route at all. What about the rest?

In order not to be unfounded, I will give a few quotes from the book:

“No one has ever cited any evidence of the mass pilgrimage of German mountain climbers, ski tourists to the Caucasus in the pre-war years. Zealous blowers of this soap bubble (even not in professorial status) could well turn to the archives of Intourist and simply count how many tourists came to the USSR from Germany in the pre-war years and for what purpose. And the system in those years was rebuilt in such a way that information about these people was accurately recorded in the documents.
But only now none of the true adherents of the story about German climbers-topographers bothered to work with the archives - this is time and money. "

“What can a climber who has arrived at an alpinist base (alpine camp) learn about the mountainous region? Approaches to several peaks (and climbers make ascents exactly to the peaks) and the path to them, as a rule, within the same valley. In some cases - approaches to the pass, if an ascent to the top is made from it. It is not a fact that this pass will be used at all in the development of an offensive in the mountains. To use the pass for the movement of pack transport (namely, such passes made sense to use for military operations), you also need to know the conditions for descending from it to another valley. That is, you need not only to climb the pass from one side, but also to descend into the river valley on the other side, and this is far from mountaineering. "

“Topography of a mountainous area in the pre-war years is months of difficult field work, tens of kilograms of field equipment, hundreds of kilograms of expeditionary cargo and materials, many tens of participants in field (or rather, mountain) expeditions, years of data processing under stationary conditions. And only after colossal labor costs and many years of scrupulous refinements, a derivative product appeared - a topographic map.

What kind of German mountaineers-artists are there with pencils and paper ?!

Here is a letter from the commander of the 98th mountain ranger regiment, Colonel Kress, to General Lanz, dated August 27, 1942:


“Despite all the thoroughness and the fact that since yesterday evening I have sent two reports on the situation, which, in spite of the inadequate German map...
... I ask to send people from the divisional headquarters to the front-line units of my group in order to receive the necessary instructions on the spot and to bring clarity, which is lacking due to bad cards».

“Well, in conclusion I would like to note (although here the reader will have to take my word for it) that in the archives of the first and fourth mountain divisions of the Wehrmacht in the Caucasus there is not a single“ thoroughbred ”map of Aryan origin. They are all either Russian or transformed from Russian maps. "


This is a trophy Russian map from the German archive. The names in Russian and the gluing of the map from several pieces are clearly visible.

The second myth. "Equipment and supplies"


One of the most widespread myths about German mountain rangers in the Great Patriotic War (1942) is a belief that has developed and cultivated for many years by various authors in their excellent mountain uniforms and chic equipment, as well as their excellent mountain equipment.

Authors of the myth


And it should be noted that the formation of this myth is directly related to those who fought with the rangers in the mountains - the veterans of the Red Army. One of the most famous of which is A. M. Gusev.

Samples of excellence?


Yes, we must admit that the personal equipment and clothing of the German mountain rangers (in comparison with how the Red Army units in the mountains were equipped and equipped) could seem to be an example of perfection. But was everything really so impeccable with the quality and quantity of this equipment?

A. Mirzonov paid special attention to the study of documents relating to these issues. And I found out that the real picture in matters of supply and equipment of the German army that came to our Caucasus during the Great Patriotic War was by no means as rosy as it was usually assumed.


Judging by the documents cited by this author, especially at the stage of the first battles in the mountains, the German huntsmen were in dire need of literally everything: from warm clothing and mountain uniforms to harnesses and pack saddles for animals (which served as a means of delivering supplies where the roads ended and trails began ).

The Germans' supply requests ranged from dozens of items of various property from sunglasses and woolen comforters to canisters and boxes for transporting property on packs.

Yes, and the pack animals themselves on the way to the Caucasus in the mountain divisions of the Wehrmacht remained so scanty that they could not provide the supply of the jaeger battalions that had gone to the mountains.

According to the assessment of the services of the quartermasters of the Wehrmacht mountain divisions in the Caucasus, the situation with the supply and equipment of units in the mountains in the period until the end of August - beginning of September was catastrophic.


Without glasses and knee-length pants


For example, here is a very characteristic touch to the illustration of the above, taken from the books "The Battle for the Passes". From Captain Grotto's report:

“The planned attack on Krugozor has been postponed from August 25 to August 26 due to the lack of protective goggles in the 7th company of the 99th mountain ranger regiment. The available number of points allows you to move only by shuttle. "

At the end of August, the commander of the Klukhor group, Colonel Kress, requested an urgent supply of clothing for the rangers. Because many of them had mountain trousers that reached their knees. The reasons for this transformation of trousers into breeches are not indicated in the document. It is possible that one of the reasons could be shrinkage of the fabric.

Anorak without hood


As for the quality and thoughtfulness of mountain uniforms, not everything was good here either.

The early mountain anorak, for example, ubiquitous in the mountainous parts, did not have a hood at all, which is an unacceptable omission in the mountains.

Blankets instead of sleeping bags


And how many people know that such equipment as a sleeping bag was completely absent as a standard piece of equipment among mountain rangers? What was used instead of sleeping bags? The most common soldiers' blankets.

Exactly the same that were used somewhere in the Donetsk or Rostov steppes.

Awnings instead of tents


What do you think was used as tents in the Caucasian highlands by the huntsmen?

In the bulk - tents (made of connected raincoats), which do not have a bottom and are blown by mountain winds.




There were very few classic tents.

As a rule, they were used either by officers or for special needs - transfer points of supply, points of command and communication, in sanitary units or at high-mountain units of mountain divisions.

Frozen to death


That is why, with the onset of cold weather in the mountains, cases of frostbite and even those who froze to death among German gamekeepers were not uncommon.

Ahovoy supply


Now about the supply during the fighting.

How many kilograms can a modern mountain hiker carry on his shoulders for a 10-12 day hike?

From my own experience I know 25-30 kg.

This set includes - tent, cushion mat, sleeping bag, down jacket, boots, thermal underwear, socks / gloves / hat, anorak and self-dumping pants, ice ax / trekking poles, ropes, harness and a set of iron that is needed on the route.

You also need to load gas + stove, pots, KLMN and the actual food for the entire route on your shoulders.

This is all modern and made from modern materials.

Let's go back to 1942 and add some more personal to the above. weapon, grenades and cartridges.

Now the question is:

"How long can you fight with this equipment?"

Answer:

"Not for long. Several days with strict economy. "

Then there is a problem with the work of the rear units, with the supply of combat units with everything they need. And no longer by road.

So, this issue of supplying combat units went to the command level of the 49th mountain corps of the Wehrmacht.

Without 4 thousand mules


According to the calculations of the corps commander, General Konrad, for a stable supply of the grouping going to Sukhumi, about 4 thousand pack animals were required, which there was simply nowhere to take?

Due to the lack of mules, they got out of the situation by buying or requisitioning donkeys and horses from the Karachai population.

There was not enough of everything - pack saddles, harnesses, horseshoes.

From German documents it follows that the harness was often made of ropes.

9000 Russian prisoners of burden for one German division


But besides the beasts of burden in the mountains there was a huge army of porters, which were used by Soviet prisoners of war. Not only captured in the mountains, but also transferred to the mountains from the camps in the Kuban and Stavropol regions.

"As of September 4, only for food supply and only for the 4th mountain division of the Wehrmacht, 8798 people were involved."

And these porters were treated like consumables.

A sad fate awaited the exhausted and sick, because the Germans did not have a shortage of such a labor force.




Lingering non-major


No, not everything was so major with the gamekeepers with the provision and supply. And A. Mirzonov convincingly and on the basis of German documents refutes this one of the well-established myths about the mountain war in the Caucasus.

Reading the lines of "Battle for the Passes", you begin to understand - not everything was so great in the "Kingdom of Danish". And the emerging problems swept the corps rear services.

Difficulties with the supply of jaeger units in the mountains became one of the main reasons for stopping the active operations of the Nazis in the Caucasian highlands.

Based on the above data, the author makes an interesting conclusion that the units of the two mountain divisions of the Wehrmacht that came to the Caucasus were not ready for a protracted war in the highlands.

Lingering is the key word in this case.

The entire calculation in the plans for the German units to reach the coast was based on the rapid overcoming of the Main Caucasian ridge with the existence of illusory hopes for insignificant resistance from the Red Army units on the mountain front.

Of course, the stubborn resistance of our rank-and-file soldiers and commanders played a decisive role in thwarting the plans of the Germans to break through to the sea through the passes.

As a result of the unsuccessful mountain blitzkrieg, in mid-September, part of the rangers in the main directions withdrew from the southern slopes to the GKh passes and held their defenses there until January 1943.

Another look


It is possible to develop this topic further, but I don’t want to deprive those who want to read the books of Alexander Mirzonov from pleasure.

This is a titanic work!

And, thanks to him, we can comprehend in a different way everything that happened during the war on the Caucasian passes.

Dry lines from the combat logs of the German mountain divisions and other combat documents stored in the German archives, combined with the analysis of the archival documents of the Red Army, allow us to rediscover those old and little-known events.

And yes it really is other a look at the past mountain war of 1942.
PS Quotes from the book and other materials are published with the consent of Alexander Mirzonov - the author of the book "Battle for the Passes".
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    7 December 2020 14: 45
    Interesting article, thanks to the author.
  2. +1
    8 December 2020 02: 10
    But if it was so with pedantic and prudent Germans ... then I think it was even harder for our defenders ... maybe someone will educate the USSR preparing for a war in the mountains?
    1. +3
      8 December 2020 14: 39
      Alexey, I am preparing a second article close to your question.
      1. +2
        9 December 2020 07: 22
        Ravik - there is a TV series, "The Great War" and in the "Battle for the Caucasus" series, it is mentioned about failures in securing the mountainous parts of the Germans, up to deaths from hunger. But TV is one thing, and a book is a completely different level. Thank you for the information about A. Mirzonov's work, and we are looking forward to your next article. Yes
        1. +1
          9 December 2020 10: 51
          Igor, thank you for your feedback!
          But no matter how many articles I write, this is a small part of the information from the book ...
          By the way, the author is preparing the third book for publication.
          1. +2
            9 December 2020 11: 05
            Ravik - You don't need to retell the whole book - if you attract attention to an interesting work - it's already good. I will definitely read it and take my time (pensioner) hi
            1. +1
              9 December 2020 11: 11
              I agree. The author of the book got a little "aroused".
              I think he will soon put the material itself on VO.
              Read, ask him questions. A very erudite person.
    2. 0
      9 December 2020 13: 52
      Our mountainous units in 1941 were in the west there and lay down during the retreat from the Carpathians.
      In general, for fighting in mountainous conditions, the preparation is somewhat peculiar, and one should not consider all the rangers as virtuoso climbers at the main part of the basis of mountaineering training. Remembering our preparation, descent, ascent, walking on talus, crossing rivers and with much did not bother.
      I heard that there were parts with excellent training as climbers.
  3. +2
    8 December 2020 06: 29
    Good article.
    Was on Elbrus, at the summit in 2006. I was in the Ullu-Tau alp camp several times.
    I will find and definitely read a book.
  4. 0
    9 December 2020 15: 36
    Company Grigoryants is an exception, the haste of the command. And then for the storming of Elbrus, Soviet soldiers were prepared according to all the rules of mountain climbing with all equipment. One of the specialist mountaineers who trained Soviet soldiers was Mikhail Khergiani, who for some reason was completely forgotten.
    1. 0
      9 December 2020 17: 20
      You are wrong. The Grigoryants company is far from the exception, but rather the rule.
    2. +2
      10 December 2020 20: 14
      You joked? Mikhail Khergiani was born in 1932. Fighting in the Elbrus region took place in August - November 1942. Are you saying that a ten-year-old was training soldiers?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"