Military Review

Russia responded to Japan's claims to the deployment of the S-300V4 air defense system in the Kuril Islands

71

In Japan, they reacted to the transfer of S-300V4 anti-aircraft missile systems to the Kuril Islands.


A Japanese cabinet spokesman said Tokyo "regrets the transfer of weapons systems to the islands." At the same time, in Japan, the islands were once again called the "northern territories".

From the report:

This placement is unacceptable. It does not correspond to Japan's position on the status of the northern territories.

Recall that the day before in Tokyo, Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga received a delegation of Japanese prefects, who called on the official to "speed up the process of returning the northern territories to Japanese jurisdiction." Suge said he was ready to make every effort to sign a peace treaty with Russia, and added that in a telephone conversation with President Putin, he noted that he was "ready to put an end to the problem with the islands."

Russia responded to Tokyo's claims to the deployment of S-300s in the Kuril Islands and to statements about "the unacceptability of such deployment of weapons systems."

In particular, it is reminded that the S-300 is a purely defensive system. And if someone is against the placement of such a system, then it looks at least strange. It was also noted that Russia has the right to deploy air defense weapons anywhere on its territory, where it sees fit.
71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. evgen1221
    evgen1221 2 December 2020 06: 12
    +28
    How can the Japanese put an end to the problem (of the northern territories)? - just put an end.
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 2 December 2020 06: 26
      +13
      Russia responded to Japan's claims to the deployment of the S-300V4 air defense system in the Kuril Islands
      one more "claim" is to supply the S-400 ... one more, to supply the S-500. and "bastions" and "balls" God himself ordered.yes
      1. seregin-s1
        seregin-s1 2 December 2020 08: 16
        +15
        The bastions have stood there for a long time. Let them rage.)
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 2 December 2020 09: 18
          +3
          The bastions have stood there for a long time.

          And no one said they were defensive. laughing
          1. krot
            krot 2 December 2020 09: 25
            +7
            This placement is unacceptable. It does not correspond to Japan's position on the status of the northern territories.

            The Japanese completely went crazy laughing ... Where we want, we put it there on our soil!
            1. Artunis
              Artunis 2 December 2020 13: 46
              +4
              Well, if we take it for a fact that after the end of the war Japan stands in front of the Yankees in a position called "ra .... m", then you can really see a clear discrepancy between the desires and capabilities of the high contracting parties!
              1. Alex777
                Alex777 2 December 2020 19: 27
                +3
                after the end of the war, Japan stands in front of the Yankees in position

                You're right. Completely.
                "Japan's position" evokes sympathy. wink
          2. Vladimir Mashkov
            Vladimir Mashkov 2 December 2020 16: 37
            +4
            Russia has every right to post on its territory anything (especially - their protective weapons), not paying attention to the indignation and cries of anyone in the world!

            As for Japan's statements about the mythical "northern territories" (as they call the RUSSIAN islands), then, of course, Russia should make statements about Japan's distortion of historical truth and an arrogant claim to part Russian territory. But it will be repeated too often. Should you be like stupid Japanese parrots?
            1. Xnumx vis
              Xnumx vis 3 December 2020 11: 16
              +4
              Let them first remove the Americans from their Japanese land, stop paying tribute to the Americans. To me, too, "samurai" lousy !!! ---- As part of the forces and troops of the United States in Japan serve about 47 thousand military personnel, as well as about 52 thousand members of their families, work 5500 civil servants. The content of the bases is largely paid by the Japanese government. In addition, Tokyo is also almost entirely responsible for paying salaries to the base personnel, consisting of Japanese citizens. ... Terpily, damn Japanese mother!
      2. Maikcg
        Maikcg 2 December 2020 16: 11
        +2
        Iskander is better, the end will lie all over Hokkaido
      3. Boris Chernikov
        Boris Chernikov 2 December 2020 18: 02
        0
        you can throw the Armor and Torah there ... so that naughty thoughts do not arise
    2. Victor_B
      Victor_B 2 December 2020 06: 34
      +8
      Quote: evgen1221
      - just put an end.

      Here we are!
      For them.
      On them!
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 2 December 2020 09: 57
        +2
        Su35S are also located there. Interestingly, the Su35S can issue a CU for Shooting for the S300-400 and Balls and Bastions?
    3. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 3 December 2020 07: 27
      +1
      They were offered the best possible solution to the issue. They flatly refused.
  2. NDR-791
    NDR-791 2 December 2020 06: 17
    +21
    This placement is unacceptable. It does not correspond to Japan's position on the status of the northern territories.
    This placement of Japan on the world map does not correspond to my position on the status of capitulators.
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 2 December 2020 09: 20
      +8
      This placement is unacceptable. It does not correspond to Japan's position on the status of the northern territories.

      How many problems Japan has ... And all because of the wrong point of view. bully
  3. Dude
    Dude 2 December 2020 06: 22
    +23
    In particular, it is reminded that the S-300 is a purely defensive system.
    Again some kind of mumbled ... What, nafik, difference - defensive, offensive, but even a field kitchen!
    Our land - we set what we want !!
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 2 December 2020 06: 29
      +5
      Quote: Dude
      Again some kind of mumble ...

      the new prime minister fills ... the path is trodden.
      1. Dude
        Dude 2 December 2020 06: 33
        +9
        Quote: Aerodrome
        Quote: Dude
        Again some kind of mumble ...

        the new prime minister fills ... the path is trodden.

        Everything is clear about Yoshihida, I mean, in my opinion, excessive diplomacy our Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
      2. Polite Moose
        Polite Moose 2 December 2020 07: 22
        +9
        Quote: Aerodrome
        the new prime minister fills ... the path is trodden.

        Without the grave of his father, the statement looks rather weak. No.
        1. Aerodrome
          Aerodrome 2 December 2020 07: 44
          +4
          Quote: Polite Moose
          Quote: Aerodrome
          the new prime minister fills ... the path is trodden.

          Without the grave of his father, the statement looks rather weak. No.

          I agree...
        2. sleeve
          sleeve 2 December 2020 14: 16
          +4
          After the previous prime minister, they may spit from the grave in response.
          1. Russobel
            Russobel 6 December 2020 05: 38
            +1
            After the previous prime minister, they can spit from the grave in response
            Damn, laughed ...
            The hike not only spit but also throw the tibia into the blunt samurai head.
      3. Grits
        Grits 5 December 2020 03: 21
        0
        Quote: Aerodrome
        the new prime minister fills ... the path is trodden.

        Did you also go along the path to the grave of your father to take an oath?
    2. Kuz
      Kuz 2 December 2020 07: 08
      +29
      Quote: Dude
      Again some kind of mumbled

      I agree that the Foreign Ministry could have responded more harshly. This kind of politeness creates the illusion of permissiveness among the "partners".
      1. Grits
        Grits 5 December 2020 03: 35
        +1
        Quote: Kuz
        I agree that the Foreign Ministry could have responded more harshly. This kind of politeness creates the illusion of permissiveness among the "partners".

        The Foreign Ministry's response should be something like this:
        Russia has the right to place any weapons on its territory. Both defensive and offensive. Including the latest missile systems of various types of basing. The Defense Ministry also plans to create a full-fledged naval base on the Kuril Islands, airfields for all types of aircraft, including missile carriers and bomber aircraft. The issue of the deployment of long-range artillery systems on the islands directly adjacent to the southern maritime border of Russia is being considered. On one of the islands of the Kuril ridge, the deployment on a permanent basis of a large group of Pacific Fleet marines with attached weapons will begin in the near future.
        Such a statement by the Foreign Ministry will make the prime minister quickly forget about the existence of the "northern territories" and may cause involuntary defecation. Not Lavrov's bleating ...
    3. Tiksi-3
      Tiksi-3 2 December 2020 07: 36
      +10
      Quote: Dude
      Again some kind of mumbled.

      exactly! ... how tired of some kind of excuse ... defensive ... Yapi joined the sanctions, and this is an economic war ... so it is necessary to strengthen the Far East and the Kuriles, in particular, air defense + IMF .... this is the basis in the region!
      1. Aerodrome
        Aerodrome 2 December 2020 07: 46
        +4
        Quote: Tiksi-3
        So that it is necessary to strengthen the Far East and the Kuriles, in particular, the air defense + IMF .... this is the basis in this region!

        I beg your pardon ... and the International Monetary Fund ... the IMF ... exactly the "backbone"? what
        1. Tiksi-3
          Tiksi-3 2 December 2020 08: 00
          +5
          Quote: Aerodrome
          International Monetary Fund ... IMF ... exactly the "backbone"?

          Namely)) Navy)) ... but I can't fix it anymore ((.... thanks))
          1. Dude
            Dude 2 December 2020 10: 06
            +4
            I'm with the "IMF" also swollen, at first laughing
            It's a funny mess! good
    4. Interlocutor
      Interlocutor 2 December 2020 11: 48
      +2
      Again some kind of mumbled ... What, nafik, difference - defensive, offensive, but even a field kitchen!
      Our land - we set what we want !!


      Diplomacy is the ability to gently send so far that a person will not notice, but will go and go and go.
      We were the ones who shouted at each other and sat happy. Whose is the last word, and there must be careful. Country with country speaks, and a bunch of countries are listening.
      1. Dude
        Dude 2 December 2020 14: 15
        +5
        Diplomacy is the ability to gently send ...
        Diplomacy is different. Once soft, and once hard. It is impossible to constantly get off with soft language, "smooth the corners". No, it is often useful and even necessary, but by no means always. (Remember the "last Chinese warning" meme?)
        The overly soft, and even, IMHO, incomprehensible, allowing for different interpretations, the position of our Foreign Ministry on the Kuril issue inspires certain hopes in the Japanese and allows them to pedal this topic.
        And "a bunch of countries", as you write, "listen" to the hum of our foreign policy department, and ... draws conclusions.
        In my opinion, we, in general, are too afraid of inadvertently hurting the tender feelings of our many "partners".
        1. Grits
          Grits 5 December 2020 03: 38
          +2
          Quote: Dude
          In my opinion, we are, in general, too afraid of inadvertently hurting the tender feelings of our many "partners"

          Recently, we are afraid not only of offending the "partners", but even of the Balts, Bandera, proud highlanders and other young people.
  4. aleks neym_2
    aleks neym_2 2 December 2020 06: 24
    +9
    Maybe they still need to ask permission to build a toilet? It's time to close this topic (about the islands) once and for all: tired.
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 2 December 2020 06: 32
      +4
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      Maybe they still need to ask permission to build a toilet? It's time to close this topic (about the islands) once and for all: tired.

      Yes, they are already tired of the TV show with perversions, but here the soil is fertile, imperial ambitions (although, according to the samurai code, they all had to be killed, the shame of surrender is not washed off.) tongue
      1. Grits
        Grits 5 December 2020 03: 43
        0
        Quote: Aerodrome
        according to the samurai code, they all had to be stabbed to death, the shame of surrender is not washed off.

        At the end of the war, my grandfather worked on a collective farm in the Far East with the Japanese prisoners. I cleaned the cowsheds together with a Japanese officer - a samurai in some kind of cool rank or status. Some sort of saboteur who speaks Russian. And for some reason he did not make himself hara-kiri and did not even shoot himself. Everyone wanted to live, knowing that the war was lost.
        By the way, my grandfather made friends with him. The samurai, in conversations with his grandfather, was keenly interested in how his grandfather, up to 43 years old, killed the Fritzes in Leningrad and himself told a lot of interesting things. The grandfather then fought for him to be left in the USSR after the deportation. The Japanese said that they would definitely kill him there.
    2. Victor_B
      Victor_B 2 December 2020 06: 38
      -2
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      It's time to close this topic (about the islands) once and for all: tired.

      So according to the new amendments and closed.
      No newly-minted Khrushchev, Bald, Yeltsin and Medved will be able to give anything from the master's shoulder.
      Yes, and Putin would not have been able to give the Tarabarov Island near Khabarovsk to the Chinese.
      1. Dude
        Dude 3 December 2020 00: 52
        0
        So according to the new amendments and closed.
        Read the amendment text carefully. Absolutely nothing was closed, the possibility of alienation of territories, alas, remains.
  5. Fedor Sokolov
    Fedor Sokolov 2 December 2020 06: 37
    +16
    The impudent samurai will not get away with the so-called "northern territories". Here the question is simple, does Japan recognize participation in World War II on the side of the 3rd Reich or not? If the Japanese refuse to surrender signed by them, then Russia, as the successor of the USSR, is still in a state of war with Japan and has the right to launch military strikes against it until it recognizes the results of World War II. An example of this is Israel, which regularly arranges an air missile attack on the territory of Syria, arguing that there is no peace treaty between the countries.
    1. Polite Moose
      Polite Moose 2 December 2020 07: 33
      +7
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      The impudent samurai will not get away with the so-called "northern territories".

      Don't break your heart, colleague. This statement of the Yaps is akin to how, for example, in our country, Medvedev said: "I will put an end to corruption." fellow
      Everyone needs political points and votes. This music will be eternal ...
      1. Egoza
        Egoza 2 December 2020 08: 09
        +4
        Quote: Polite Elk
        This music will be eternal ...

        Nothing is eternal under the Moon! A couple more tsunamis-awakened volcanoes-malfunctions at the nuclear power plant and .... there was no such country Japan. All went under the water. The only pity is that it is impossible to separate the normal righteous from the rabid politicians-militarists.
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 2 December 2020 06: 38
    +18
    This placement is unacceptable. It does not correspond to Japan's position on the status of the northern territories.
    It's already ridiculously boring. Is it weak to call the deployment of American bases on its territory unacceptable (we do not take into account individual Japanese demonstrations)? Of course, blathering towards Russia does not threaten anything, and the demands on the United States may end in trouble. If so stubborn, then gather all in good weather in a place from where you can see the South. Smokers and rip your stomachs open. And the "honor" will be preserved and there will be no more moaning about the "northern territories".
    1. VORON538
      VORON538 2 December 2020 06: 46
      +9
      For them, American military bases in Japan are "THIS OTHER". :)))
  7. Black_PR
    Black_PR 2 December 2020 07: 06
    +5
    ... "that Tokyo" regrets the transfer of weapons systems to the islands "...". We have heard, considered, sent. Everything.
  8. rocket757
    rocket757 2 December 2020 07: 11
    +2
    Russia responded to Japan's claims to the deployment of the S-300V4 air defense system in the Kuril Islands

    The same answer as NATO's head .... a couple, three specific, understandable expressions and truncated!
  9. Kapkan
    Kapkan 2 December 2020 08: 19
    +9
    Russia responded to Japan's claims

    This fact already insults me.

    How would you (respondents) teach politics then, eh ??
    Okay, I'll give you an example of how to behave in such a situation:
    News:
    "Japan expressed blah blah blah ..."
    Russia's reaction:
    Russia LEFT WITHOUT ATTENTION expressed by Japan blah blah blah ...
    This is the news awaiting in Russia.
    They hesitated to make excuses ... the nuclear power of the Mlyn ...
  10. Crabong
    Crabong 2 December 2020 08: 24
    +2
    When Japan becomes a sovereign country, then it will be possible to talk about a peace treaty.
  11. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 2 December 2020 08: 24
    +8
    Particularly good is the passage that the deployment of Russian air defense systems on Russian territories "does not correspond to the position of Japan." Japan's position is third since 1945. And it is not their business where and how Russia is deploying troops on its territory. And then these nesamurais already believe that their opinion should be of interest to everyone.
  12. Ros 56
    Ros 56 2 December 2020 08: 26
    +3
    The Kuriles are the territory of Russia, and all the Japanese statements on this matter are inappropriate. stop
  13. mongol9999
    mongol9999 2 December 2020 08: 30
    +2
    I read the headlines. They answered here, commented there ... When will we ask?
  14. Radius
    Radius 2 December 2020 08: 55
    +7
    There is no "status of the northern territories". This is the territory of the Russian Federation.
  15. Nikon OConor
    Nikon OConor 2 December 2020 09: 28
    +5
    So I move furniture at home as I want. And I consult only with my wife and not with my neighbors.
  16. Nikon OConor
    Nikon OConor 2 December 2020 09: 40
    +3
    I sit and laugh)) In this context, who is the wife? Belarus??? What for is my multi-vector wife? )))))
  17. grandfather_Kostya
    grandfather_Kostya 2 December 2020 09: 40
    +2
    It is high time to prepare a standard-vague answer like "we put our weapons on our territory" and send it every time with one click without bothering with variety.
  18. Evil 55
    Evil 55 2 December 2020 09: 44
    +6
    We are also quite worried about the presence of more than 70 thousand US troops in Japan ... so we don't jump, we don't throw mud on anyone, and we don't demand anything special ...
  19. Operator
    Operator 2 December 2020 10: 19
    +1
    Japanese Prime Minister puts an end to the fight for the northern territories bully
  20. Prisoner
    Prisoner 2 December 2020 10: 57
    +2
    Well, sorry. You can regret from morning to evening and from evening to morning. And in chorus. And we will arrange what is required on our land.
  21. Gueuze Ulenspiegel
    Gueuze Ulenspiegel 2 December 2020 11: 08
    +8
    Something like that!
  22. the47th
    the47th 2 December 2020 12: 23
    +5
    Eh, the "northern territories" are haunted by the Americans.
  23. svoit
    svoit 2 December 2020 15: 11
    +1
    Quote: aleks neym_2
    It's time to close this topic (about the islands) once and for all: tired.

    The problem is with the Japanese, since their primier said that he would close, then he would close
  24. EVDmitri
    EVDmitri 2 December 2020 15: 18
    +2
    The Japanese are talking ... And what, the Russians also arranged Hiroshima for them?
  25. Cuba
    Cuba 2 December 2020 15: 25
    +1
    They hammer like woodpeckers - everything is the same! .... calm down and forget - Russia is not for sale!
  26. Yuriy71
    Yuriy71 2 December 2020 16: 01
    +2
    AS ALWAYS Russia's answer is ridiculous! - Russia seems to be making excuses, explaining to them that this is a defensive weapon! And you need not explain, but send to KUI! In fact, Russia's relationship with Japan is a litmus test and an indicator to the Russians - who rules you !!!?
  27. Hort
    Hort 2 December 2020 16: 31
    -1
    Well, let them become part of the Kuriles, there will be a new federal district - they will put an end to the problem of the northern territories. Taking into account the latest changes in the Constitution on the inadmissibility of alienation of the territory / calls for this, the hell will then come out
  28. hydroy
    hydroy 2 December 2020 17: 02
    0
    To strengthen the strike group of the DV SU-57 and the Hunter!
  29. alex-sherbakov48
    alex-sherbakov48 2 December 2020 17: 15
    +2
    We put our territory where we want, and no one, and even more so Japan, has no right to indicate to us. There was no need to fight on the side of Hitler. The Japanese talk about the non-aggression pact signed between Japan and the USSR, and how many of our soldiers and civilians were killed by the Japanese military during this period? They keep quiet about this, but our memory has not lost its memory, and therefore the Japanese will not see these islands as their ears.
  30. Lighten
    Lighten 2 December 2020 21: 45
    +1
    Answer. "not interested". Well, or "fuck you"
  31. Rzzz
    Rzzz 3 December 2020 00: 00
    +1
    In general, this problem of the "northern territories has been looking very strange lately. It is not clear who benefits from it. Or rather, even so, who benefits more from these" streams. "Japanese politicians with the idea of" here we will return everything " officials (there are no politicians in Russia) with the idea of ​​“we will not give up our native land.” Second, it looks like the land itself does not care, but to make a beautiful image on this is a nice thing.
  32. Alexfly
    Alexfly 3 December 2020 09: 53
    +1
    Russia is also unacceptable for the deployment of American troops on the territory located in the immediate vicinity of the borders of the Russian Federation.
  33. certero
    certero 3 December 2020 16: 39
    +1
    Quote: Interlocutor
    Diplomacy is the ability to gently send so far that a person will not notice, but will go and go and go.

    in the days of the Soviet Union they simply said that there was no problem with the northern territory, and accordingly did not comment on any statements by Japan about what we were placing there or not on the Kuril Islands
  34. APASUS
    APASUS 6 December 2020 20: 10
    0
    Ours long ago (via deep channels), had to demand confirmation of the signature, under the protocol of surrender from Japan.
    It is clear that this will cause another political crisis in the country, but a political crisis in Japan is better than hostilities.
    You have to do a little ahead of the curve!