"General Forward". How Suvorov smashed the Polish Confederates

55
"General Forward". How Suvorov smashed the Polish Confederates
Delivery of the Krakow Castle. French officers give swords to A. V. Suvorov. Engraving by R.V. Küfner after a drawing by I.D.

The military achievements of Alexander Suvorov were so great that during his lifetime his allies and opponents spoke of him with admiration. The Austrians nicknamed him "General Forward", celebrating Suvorov's swift and always successful tactics.

Hero of the Nations


"Hero of all ages and all peoples"

- said the Austrian general Tsakh about him.



"Suvorov has enemies, but not rivals"

- noted the Italian General Saint-Andre.

It is known that the great French commander Napoleon admired the Russian genius of war. He considered Suvorov the best in military affairs and studied with him. In fact, he adopted the methods of Suvorov's military art:

"Eye, speed and onslaught."

Napoleon himself, in letters to the Directory from Egypt, noted that Suvorov could not be stopped on the path of victories until his arts of war were comprehended and his own rules were opposed to him.

Alexander Vasilyevich had a special gift for finding and enhancing talents. In this he resembled the person he had been equal to since childhood - Peter the Great. And on another great commander and ruler of France - Napoleon.

“Talent in a person,” Suvorov said, “is a diamond in clay. Having found it, one must immediately cleanse it and show its brilliance. Talent, snatched from the crowd, surpasses many others, for it owes not to breed, not to teaching, and not to seniority, but to itself. Seniority is the lot of mediocre people who do not get promoted, but live up to the officials. "

Suzdal regiment


In 1763, Alexander Suvorov was given command of the Suzdal Infantry Regiment, which was stationed in Novaya Ladoga. Here the colonel was able to turn around, actively introduced his method. He turned the regiment into a real combat unit.

At that time it was believed that all the best and the most advanced appeared in Europe. In the Russian elite, there was an admiration for an enlightened Europe. The Prussian king Frederick, with whom Russia fought for seven years and beat the "invincible" Prussian army, was now considered the ideal commander. And the Prussian system was recognized as the best in Europe and the world.

The landlord officers especially liked the cane system. The Prussian army adhered to the most severe discipline, for any disobedience and mistakes the soldiers were brutally beaten. Therefore, Russian officers, like the rest of Europe, imitated Frederick. (Although the Russian army beat the vaunted Prussian army). According to the Prussian model, uniforms were sewn and their hair was curled, according to the Prussian system, soldiers were chased to the parade ground all day, beaten with sticks. The soldiers were tortured so that everything was smooth and beautiful, in one line. Made to polish endlessly weapon, whiten belts, comb and powder your hair. As a result, the troops could march beautifully. Their combat capability did not increase from this.

Alexander Vasilievich taught his soldiers real combat. Made of them fighters - "miracle heroes", before whom there were no obstacles. At the same time, they did not hate their commander, but adored, loved. The soldiers reciprocated the commander. Suvorov loved and took care of his soldiers. He delved into every little detail of a soldier's life, tried to improve it. I always tried to avoid unnecessary losses. He called to fight not by number but by skill. Said:

“It's hard to learn - easy to hike! Easy to learn - hard to hike! "

Colonel Suvorov made sure that the soldiers observed cleanliness (the basis of health), so that they knew how to quickly load and shoot accurately. He didn’t force me to march pointlessly and do exercises on the parade ground all day long. But he could at any time (at night and in the rain, in any bad weather) raise a battalion or regiment and, without carts, start a march for several days. The troops made quick crossings, forced rivers, gapped swamps, made night attacks, stormed fortifications.

Suvorov taught the soldier to fight in real life and not stop at any obstacle, to be brave, decisive and disciplined. I put fighting spirit in the first place:

"Forward! God is with us! The Russian army is invincible! "

Or used to say:

"We are Russians and therefore we will win."

Suvorov was a real patriot, a statesman:

“Nature has produced only one Russia. She has no rivals. We are Russians, we will overcome everything. "

This was taught to officers and soldiers. And his miracle heroes worked real miracles.

Thus, if in all the regiments of the Russian army soldiers were then being prepared for the parade, Colonel Suvorov was preparing the Suzdal people for battle. His regiment marched 100 miles in two days (an ordinary regiment traveled no more than 10 miles per day). His soldiers knew what they were doing. The colonel used to say:

"Every soldier must know his own maneuver."

The training with Colonel Suvorov usually ended with a through bayonet attack - two battalions went with bayonets against each other. This is how the Suvorovites appeared in the army - miraculous heroes, ready for a fierce battle and anywhere, in the field, in the fortress or in the mountains. People who were not afraid of death and solved the most difficult combat missions.


Portrait of A. V. Suvorov. N. Utkin. 1818

Krasnoselskie exercises


During the command of the Suzdal regiment, Suvorov drew up a "Regimental institution" - an instruction that contained the main provisions and rules for the education of soldiers, internal service and combat training of troops.

The eccentric colonel interested the capital. Empress Catherine II wanted to see the Suzdal regiment, which everyone was talking about. The empress liked what she saw: the Suzdal men were loading their guns almost twice as fast as the guards rangers, marching merrily, cheerfully and soon, almost at a run, fenced perfectly with bayonets. Catherine thanked Suvorov and said that the Suzdal regiment is a school for the entire army.

However, Alexander Vasilyevich received neither a promotion nor a new appointment. The possible favorite of the Empress was looked at with envy. By this time, the colonel had lost his former patrons, but did not acquire new ones.

His father's star was on the wane. Hannibal by Peter III was dismissed. After the Seven Years War, Fermor was removed from military service and became a senator (it was an honorary pension). Elderly Buturlin has lost its former influence.

They tried to denigrate the Suzdal colonel. There were rumors in the capital that he was exhausting the soldiers with backbreaking work. He built a school for soldiers' children and a church with their hands, and planted a garden. The commander himself teaches at the school, he himself wrote a textbook. He arranges performances for the soldiers, and the officers act out plays. That is, the regiment commander was engaged in the education of soldiers (former peasants). The eccentric colonel was again talked about. The governor came to check. He examined the regiment, its facilities, and attended the performance. I was satisfied with everything.

The nods to Suvorov were dispelled in the summer of 1765 after great exercises in Krasnoe Selo. The camp houses 17 infantry and 7 cavalry regiments (30 thousand people). Field Marshal Buturlin's Guards Division, Golitsyn's 2nd Division and Panin's 3rd Finnish Division. The troops were divided into two armies under the command of Catherine and Panin. The second army consisted of Buturlin's guards and Golitsyn's regiments. The Izmailovsky Life Guards Regiment from Buturlin received Suvorov the father (Vasily Ivanovich). Catherine, with her army, formed a light corps: it included cavalry, a battalion and grenadier companies of the Suzdal regiment. This corps conducted reconnaissance of the enemy location (Panin's division). The cavalry pushed the enemy forward patrols. Panin held a strong position. He adhered to linear tactics: two thin lines, defense of important points. On the heights, cannons with cover. Suvorov saw that this line could be broken anywhere, as long as the forces were concentrated.

And Suvorov led the Suzdal people into a swift attack on the artillery positions. The grenadiers distracted the enemy with a false attack, and the battalion rushed into a decisive attack. The artillerymen managed to fire one volley. But this did not stop the Suvorovites, in Novaya Ladoga their commander more than once led them to attack the guns. Suvorov's musketeers overturned the infantry cover and saddled the guns. Suvorov was already turning the guns to open fire on Panin's infantry, but he was stopped by Catherine's order. The Empress liked the colonel's quickness and activity, but his decisiveness frightened, went beyond the accepted rules of the game. Suvorov was ordered to withdraw. They expected that after such a brilliant performance of Suvorov, a promotion and high appointment awaited. In the order for maneuvers, Suvorov, the only colonel, was mentioned with praise along with the generals. However, the expectation did not come true. Suvorov returned to Novaya Ladoga without a promotion.

How Suvorov took Krakow


In the 1760s, Rzeczpospolita was at the stage of complete decomposition. Warsaw's foreign policy was subordinate to the neighboring great powers - Russia, Austria and Prussia. Petersburg was able to plant the pro-Russian king Stanislav II Augustus on the Polish throne. At the same time, most of the lords still looked to the West.

Although it was Catherine II who at that time did not want the partition of Poland, preferring to keep the Polish state as a buffer between Russia and Prussia, Austria. When the threat of another Russian-Turkish war arose, Russia's opponents in Poland became more active. They created the Bar confederation, started a war against the king and supporters of the alliance with the Russian Empire. The Polish lords hoped for help from France, Austria, Turkey and the Crimean Khanate. Rzeczpospolita plunged into the chaos of a civil war.

In this war, government and Russian troops fought the rebels. Austria gave refuge to Confederate troops. They were based in Silesia and Hungary. France sent experienced commanders, including Colonel Dumouriez. Also, the French pushed Turkey to a war against the Russians, which in the end they did.

The guerrilla war went on with varying success. Polish mounted militias were usually unable to withstand Russian regular troops. But the best Russian units were in the war with Turkey, and there was no way to crush the enemy in numbers (also because of the war with the Turks). The Russian army could not carry out large-scale operations to cleanse entire areas from the Confederates, and at the same time protect cities and important points. Therefore, this war has become a whole series of skirmishes. Russian (usually small) detachments pursued the enemy and crushed the Poles. The rebels maneuvered, tried to intercept small units and transports. When threatened with destruction, they fled to Austria.

It was in Poland that the brigadier Alexander Suvorov acquired his first loud military glory. In November 1768, he, together with the Suzdal regiment, set out from Novaya Ladoga and arrived in Smolensk in December. The regiment covered 927 km in a month. In May 1769 he received a brigade of the Suzdal, Smolensk and Nizhny Novgorod infantry regiments. He began to teach the regiments to act like Suvorov.

In July his regiments were in Poland, in August in the outskirts of Warsaw ꟷ Prague. For a month, the brigade walked 850 miles in Poland, having lost only a few people sick. At the end of August, Brigadier Suvorov received an order to eliminate a large enemy detachment, commanded by Kazimir and Franz Pulawski.

On August 31, Suvorov arrived in Brest. With a small detachment, he immediately began to search for the enemy. On September 2 (13), he overtook the enemy near the village of Orekhovo. The Confederates had 2 thousand fighters, Suvorov had 320 (based on the Suzdal grenadier company). The Russian commander crushed the enemy with a decisive attack. In the Russian unit, only a few people were killed and wounded. The Poles lost several hundred people killed and captured. One of the best commanders of the Confederates, Franz Pulawsky, was killed. The next day, a detachment of Colonel Renne (Kargopol Carabinieri Regiment) finished off a Polish detachment in the battle at Lomza. For the battle at Orekhov in January 1770, Suvorov was awarded the rank of major general and the Order of St. Anna, then was awarded the Order of St. George 3rd degree.

Suvorov was given a new task - to clean up the Lublin area. It was a serious task - a road passed through Lublin that connected Warsaw with the army at the Danube Theater. While crossing the Vistula, Alexander Vasilyevich fell and broke his chest. He was treated for several months. Meanwhile, the French adventurer Charles Dumouriez gathered a strong detachment and with a sudden blow captured Krakow. Soon the Poles occupied the entire Krakow region.

Then Suvorov was sent against him. On May 23, 1771, Suvorov defeated a detachment of the Frenchman Dumouriez near Lyantskorona (there were 3,5 thousand Russians, about 4 thousand Poles). The Poles relied on a strong position, a head-on assault could lead to heavy losses. Suvorov was not embarrassed and attacked. The speed and surprise of the attack demoralized the Poles and the French. They fled, losing several hundred people killed and captured. Dumouriez, enraged by the mediocrity and self-will of the Poles, left Poland.

However, the Confederates still resisted. Kazimir Pulawski tried to take the Zamoć fortress. He was able to capture the advanced fortifications and suburb. Suvorov drove the Poles out of the outskirts of the fortress.

The defeat of the uprising in Lithuania


While Suvorov was beating Dumurie and Pulavsky, the great Lithuanian hetman Mikhail Oginsky rebelled. Suvorov immediately moved towards him. The Suvorovites walked about 4 miles in 200 days and suddenly hit the Lithuanian gentry. On September 13 (24), 1771, in the battle at Stolovichi, Suvorov's detachment (about 900 people) utterly defeated Oginsky's corps (4-5 thousand people). The entire Lithuanian corps was destroyed and scattered - hundreds of killed and captured, all the artillery and baggage were captured. The hetman at the beginning of the battle slept calmly and barely managed to escape. Oginsky went into hiding abroad. Russian losses - over 100 people.

The uprising in Lithuania is suppressed. For the defeat of the Lithuanian hetman, Suvorov was awarded the Order of Alexander Nevsky. In general, Suvorov's successes in Poland contributed to the defeat of the rebels, which became the basis of the First partition of the Commonwealth.

Siege of Krakow Castle


A new batch of French officers and non-commissioned officers arrived in Poland. The military mission was led by General de Viomenil. The French and Poles decided to recapture Krakow to give new impetus to the uprising.

In January 1772, the Confederates and the French, under the command of Brigadier Choisy, captured Krakow Castle. They took advantage of the oversight of the new commander of the Suzdal regiment, Colonel Stackelberg (the regiment was stationed in Krakow). Stackelberg was dancing at the ball when the enemy made a surprise attack and was barely able to escape. The Suzdalians tried to recapture the castle, but were driven back. The castle was well fortified. Soon Suvorov returned with a detachment of Russian troops and several regiments of the crown troops (loyal to the king) of Count Branitsky. The siege of Krakow Castle began. Field guns were dragged to the upper floors of the tall buildings of the city and opened fire on the castle. But their fire was ineffective, and there were no siege weapons.

On February 2, the besieged made a sortie and set fire to the outskirts of Krakow. Suvorov personally led his soldiers into a counterattack and drove the enemy back to the castle. On February 18, Russian troops tried to take the fortress by storm, but without success. Several times the detachments of the Confederates tried to come to the aid of the besieged garrison, but were repulsed by Branitsky's cavalry and Suvorov's infantry.

At the beginning of April, siege artillery arrived, and mine galleries began to be led under the walls. Food supplies were running low. Resistance has become meaningless. Suvorov offered Shuazi an honorable surrender.

On April 15 (26), 1772, the castle garrison surrendered.

The Russian commander treated the brave Frenchman with respect and returned his sword (like other French officers).

To be continued ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    28 November 2020 04: 54
    Talent, snatched from the crowd, surpasses many others, for it owes not to breed, not to teaching and not to seniority, but to itself. Seniority is the lot of mediocre people who do not rise to the service, but live up to officials "
    This is what should be the motto for our nation's sun! And then he has been shuffling his friends for twenty years to and fro to no avail, he has already begun to attach children to them - but there’s zero sense and even less every year. How did the Urya putriots like to repeat for several years? "GDP does not surrender its own!" Nepotism is flourishing.
    (c) "Who is here, for example, in kings their own for GDP extreme? "
    1. +8
      28 November 2020 05: 19
      And then he has been shuffling his friends for twenty years to and fro to no avail,
      Aga Mutko for promotion, Chubais is also looking for a warm place now.
      All this mouse fuss against the background of the personality of Alexander Suvorov is nothing.
      Modern Poland really hates the name of Suvorov ... even in the USSR, he was surprised at this attitude, it seems that our ally in the Warsaw Pact and Suvorov was still slung with mud.
      For me, Suvorov Alexander Vasilyevich is an example of a Russian officer-general ... just such fearless and talented people should be in our army, and in our entire society ... imprisoned on the prosperity of our Motherland ... it's a pity that there are not so many of them now.
      1. +4
        28 November 2020 13: 31
        Well, it is logical that he suppressed the Polish uprisings, why should they love him?
        1. +2
          8 January 2021 09: 46
          And why did they staged a mutiny? The rebels in England are hanged and relatives to hard labor
        2. +1
          8 January 2021 09: 52
          The rebels slaughtered the unarmed soldiers of the Warsaw garrison, staged a massacre of Russians and Ukrainians, a pogrom of Jews - such allies must be outweighed ...
          The main requirement of the Confederates in all revolts is the transfer of the peasants of the Russian provinces to slaves ...
          Remember how in the 20s the Polish Poland demanded in the League of Nations to transfer the former German colonies to it? (By then captured by England)
          Isn't Churchill right when he called Poland the "jackal of Europe"?
          A joint attack with Hitler on Czechoslovakia, and the genocide of Ukrainians, Rusyns, Pomorians !?
    2. +13
      28 November 2020 05: 30
      Quote: Dalny V
      This is what should be the motto for our nation's sun!

      That's right! The events described by the author are so reminiscent of today's times, when the names of talented, gifted, capable people are overwritten with Kholui bellies and curls. All one to one. Even the situations are similar. The time when you need to show your own abilities has come ... And we still strive to hide in a bunker, but in public we “walk without a mask” ...
      For the "sun" of our nation, the words will become prophetic:
      “The ruler is weak and crafty,
      A bald dandy, the enemy of labor,
      Unintentionally warmed by glory,
      Then he reigned over us. "

      Essentially the article:
      Alexander Vasilyevich had a special gift for finding and enhancing talents. In this he resembled the person whom he had been equal to since childhood - Peter the Great. And on the other great commander and ruler of France - Napoleon.

      stop A.V.Suvorov (1730-1800) and Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) fool Not the other way around?
      1. +2
        28 November 2020 05: 40
        stop A.V.Suvorov (1730-1800) and Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) fool Not the other way around?

        Poor Massen ... Napoleon's talented general got a good beat from Alexander Vasilyevich in the Alps. smile It looks like the emperor of France had to learn from Suvorov.
        1. +3
          28 November 2020 06: 17
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          It looks like the emperor of France had to learn from Suvorov.

          So Suvorov himself taught the French "Military affairs in a real way" Yes
          He beat and beat, and put upholstery in the ass, so much so that they learned the science of speed and maneuver by heart.
          And then, reflecting that Russia no longer has Suvorov, they decided to test what they had learned in practice, invading the Republic of Ingushetia in 1812. But they miscalculated.
          A whole galaxy of Russian commanders grew up on the behests of Suvorov ...
      2. +16
        28 November 2020 05: 58
        Quote: ROSS 42
        For the "sun" of our nation, the words will become prophetic:
        “The ruler is weak and crafty,
        A bald dandy, the enemy of labor,
        Unintentionally warmed by glory,
        Then he reigned over us. "


        At the "Annual Press Conference", planned for December, he will tell that all this is not so, and not about him Yes
        1. +3
          28 November 2020 06: 13
          Quote: BDRM 667
          At the "Annual Press Conference", planned for December, he will tell that all this is not so, and not about him

          Live or will we see "sex in video mode" again?
      3. -2
        29 November 2020 10: 30
        Quote: ROSS 42
        For the "sun" of our nation, the words will become prophetic:
        “The ruler is weak and crafty,
        A bald dandy, the enemy of labor,
        Unintentionally warmed by glory,
        Then he reigned over us. "

        Yah? And if your rotten prophecy does not come true? Eat your cap or just repent? Chatting, as they say, is not carrying bags.
    3. +10
      28 November 2020 05: 53
      Quote: Dalny V
      This is what should be the motto for our nation's sun! And then he has been shuffling his friends for twenty years back and forth to no avail

      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Mutko for promotion, Chubais is also looking for a warm place now.


      Fidelity the body more important than loyalty to the cause ... This is how we live Yes
      1. +8
        28 November 2020 07: 32
        So everything is according to the Strugatskys:
        "We don't need the smart ones. We need the faithful" (c) It's hard to be a god
        1. +1
          8 January 2021 09: 58
          Look wider - "snail on the slope / Anxiety" is coming true
          Detachments of feminists / gays, bioengineering, obsession, loosening, bringing people to the state of zombies and condemnation on this basis to death ........
          "Hair on the nose"
    4. +2
      28 November 2020 18: 43
      “This is what should become the motto for our sun of the nation! Otherwise, he has been shuffling his friends back and forth for twenty years to no avail, he has already begun to attach children to them - but there’s zero sense, and even less and less every year. did they like to repeat? "GDP does not give up its own people!" Nepotism flourishes. "

      I forgot about pensions and about Kabaeva. And yes, about polymers. soldier
      1. -2
        29 November 2020 10: 41
        Quote: sevryuk
        I forgot about pensions and about Kabaeva. And yes, about polymers.

        Well, for the very stubborn - a Zhidomasson conspiracy))
  2. +7
    28 November 2020 06: 31
    I am always amazed at how they like to arrange parades here. and for what? They walk and drive for 2-3 months, but combat training is zero at this time. And they also make fun of foreigners, but they don't know how to walk in a parade, but for what? You need to learn to fight, not walk.
    1. +7
      28 November 2020 06: 39
      “The outcomes of the parades are known,
      And how will the fight end? " (from).
    2. +8
      28 November 2020 10: 35
      Quote: Free Wind
      I am always amazed at how they like to arrange parades here. and for what?
      Habit since ancient times. The legions holding the formation beat the many times superior forces of the barbarians, the slender battles of the Swiss tore apart the previously indestructible knightly cavalry, the Spanish thirds drove all opponents across Europe for a century and a half. And all thanks to the formation. If the formation could be destroyed, then the barbarians or enemy cavalry quickly multiplied the troops to zero. And you can shoot black powder only "in chorus" (on command, strictly at the same time, with the whole line at once), since after a shot for a few seconds everything is covered with smoke, which does not allow those who have not fired to aim, plus the density of fire increased the chances of hitting a larger number of targets. And walking in formation is much harder than just keeping the formation standing. But it is necessary, without this, the convoy cannot be captured (the real goal of most battles), one cannot escape the shelling of artillery, etc. Therefore, the drill was the basis of military skill. And the new commander could easily assess the quality of the troops received by simply holding a parade. Then the development of firearms made the combatant senseless (they began to shoot the cavalry, and not try to repel a peak or bayonets with a wall), but the habits remained.
      1. +2
        28 November 2020 12: 11
        Amazing! Colleague bk 0010, thanks for the new knowledge hi It was always thought that shagistika was a way to turn a soldier into a non-judgmental machine gun, which increased the fighting efficiency of the army. Well, there, the soldier will begin to doubt and challenge the commander's order during the battle, and the battle is lost. So it is written everywhere. But it turned out that this stretches from antiquity, that any parade is a demonstration of the combat readiness of Roman legionnaires.
        However, for a layman like me, a parade is an image of the triumphant entry of a contingent of our troops into the captured enemy city, and it should be beautiful, brutal)))
      2. +1
        28 November 2020 12: 34
        200 years have passed, and are there still parades?
      3. 0
        8 January 2021 10: 02
        This is not a habit - this is RELATIONSHIP IN A UNIFIED ORGANISM!
        COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION SKILL IS NECESSARY.
        In civilian life, you are a herd driven to slaughter, a crowd.
        And intelligence is your intelligence of the crowd.
  3. 0
    28 November 2020 10: 17
    Good morning everybody .
    It is wonderful that an article appeared (already the second, and I look forward to continuing) about Suvorov.
    It is necessary to write about all Russian military leaders.
    Teach young people to patriotism. And I must say there is something to write about, many military leaders have grown up in Russia, both on land and at sea.
    Keep it up .
    1. +2
      28 November 2020 12: 22
      And it will be right)))
      From the school history course of that time, I remembered Suvorov and Kutuzova, but no tsars. Until now, inquiring on the Internet: and what kind of king was he in those days? )))
      1. +2
        28 November 2020 19: 07
        (sympathetically) You don't remember Catherine the Great, right?
        1. +3
          28 November 2020 19: 23
          Oh, colleague!)))
          Don't look for a noble historian in me, but I know about Catherine the Great. But I have no personal memories of her - I have to live in later historical times))
      2. +1
        8 January 2021 10: 03
        King king what kind of king?
    2. +2
      28 November 2020 19: 08
      It is wonderful that an article appeared (already the second, and I look forward to continuing) about Suvorov.

      it's bad that Samsonov wrote it, stuffing it with his usual nonsense.
  4. -1
    28 November 2020 10: 19
    The Russian commander treated the brave Frenchman with respect and returned his sword (like other French officers).
    It was necessary to hang.
  5. +1
    28 November 2020 12: 19
    Outstanding Russian commanders were also outstanding diplomats, spoke several foreign languages, including oriental ones. And there was no Foreign Ministry. And now?
    1. +2
      28 November 2020 15: 44
      And there was no Foreign Ministry.

      Was. Griboyedov in which department did he work?
    2. Fat
      +2
      28 November 2020 18: 40
      Quote: iouris
      Outstanding Russian commanders were also outstanding diplomats, spoke several foreign languages, including oriental ones. And there was no Foreign Ministry. And now?

      In 1549, Tsar Ivan IV ordered the Duma clerk Ivan Mikhailovich Viskovaty to "be in charge of the ambassadorial affairs", who in a short time managed to put the ambassadorial documents in order, dismantled and systematized the vast tsarist archive, which had been badly damaged by the fire of 1547. For the first time under him, inventories of archival documents appeared, and records of used business papers were kept. This was the beginning of the Ambassadorial Prikaz. In the XNUMXth century, the growth of the international significance of the Russian state caused a significant expansion of the functions of the Ambassador Prikaz. Structurally, it was divided on a territorial-state basis into povytya, that is, a kind of departments that performed certain functions. Bailiffs and watchmen appeared in the order. All employees of the order were sworn in, promising to keep state secrets, not to communicate with foreigners, and to translate truthfully during translations. There were also gold writers in the order, that is, those who painted letters sent to foreign countries with gold and paints (usually the borders of letters and initial words were signed). The Ambassadorial Prikaz was entrusted with the overall leadership of the country's foreign policy and all current diplomatic work. In addition, the Ambassadorial Prikaz kept state seals and the state archive.
      The main task of Russian diplomacy at that time was control, observation of relations with foreign states, the annexation of new territories and the gathering of the Russian state. A. L. Ordin-Nashchokin, in one of his addresses to Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, especially emphasized: "In the reigning city of Moscow, the Ambassadorial Prikaz, like the apple of an eye, should be preserved for the immaculate people. Because this institution is the eye of all great Russia!" Russian diplomacy followed closely the observance of the "state interest".
    3. 0
      28 November 2020 18: 50
      The Collegium of Foreign Affairs was not a ministry in terms of its structure, but in terms of functions it was.
  6. +2
    28 November 2020 13: 30
    Suvorov is a genius ... but he did not think to adapt to anyone. He knew with some "upper knowledge" as it should. How to train soldiers, make marches, and WIN! No wonder his book is called "The Science of Winning"! Modestly so ...
  7. 0
    28 November 2020 18: 05
    The Order named after Suvorov was established ... if my memory serves me around 43. Or 44th? Well, somewhere nearby, I don't watch the wiki on purpose - I want to test my memory. I could be completely wrong. But this order is not for soldiers, for the command, which I think is not very correct. In addition, it was Suvorov who suppressed the Pugachev uprising - very bloody and very cruel. So decide, who are you for? For Pugachev, or for Suvorov? Not everything is so simple comrades in our history.
    1. +1
      28 November 2020 19: 02
      Dear colleague Averchenkov)))
      In the slender ranks of us, admirers of Suvorov, you brought a slight confusion)))
      What can I say ... The legal authority, officially anointed by God, defended itself. It's one thing when someone from the royal dynasty encroaches on the possession of the throne, participating in a conspiracy against papa or mama, and quite another when a person is from the street. The violation of the lawful course of things, arousing our sympathy, could hardly have been seen in those days otherwise than as the destruction of carefully constructed state "braces". Moreover, those times were inhumane. Hence - the attitude of the top of the army to those encroaching on the foundations.
      1. -1
        28 November 2020 19: 12
        That's right you say. But there is one big "BUT" - I do not want to be flogged in the stable, so my sympathies are probably on the side of Pugachev, although he also messed up, if I am not mistaken, he declared himself the son of the tsar or something like that ... And Suvorov? An excellent military leader loyal to the crown, at one time he was more than appropriate. I really respect him for his feats of arms, "BUT".
    2. +2
      28 November 2020 19: 06
      In addition, it was Suvorov who suppressed the Pugachev uprising - very bloody and very cruel.

      Still, take a look at the wiki, you will find out that Ivan Mikhelson played a decisive role in the suppression. Suvorov, the only thing that did noticeable - accompanied the captive Pugachev to Moscow. I just didn't have time: I arrived at the end of August, and Puguchev was tied up by their own accomplices on September 8.
      “... Pugachev was sitting in a wooden cage on a two-wheeled cart. A strong detachment, with two guns, surrounded him. Suvorov did not leave him. In the village of Mostakh (one hundred and forty versts from Samara), a fire broke out near the hut where Pugachev spent the night. They let him out of the cage, tied him to a cart along with his son, a playful and courageous boy, and all night Suvorov himself watched them "(AS Pushkin," The History of Pugachev ")
      1. -1
        29 November 2020 04: 34
        Are you trying to justify Suvorov? I understand you, and I also want an excuse, but the reality is that and there is nothing to do about it. There is no white and black - there is always something in between.
        1. 0
          3 December 2020 14: 20
          Suvorov does not need my excuses at all. The only thing is that he actually did not participate in the suppression of the Pugachev uprising - he simply did not have time for the main events. What does black and white have to do with it?
          1. 0
            3 December 2020 20: 53
            Okay, let it be your way, although I'm not sure about that. But if he had time for these very events ... would he have suppressed the uprising? I think so, and just as cruel.
            Black and white means that there are no absolutely good or absolutely bad people - people are different in different situations, and even more so from different points of view.
        2. 0
          8 December 2020 17: 44
          Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
          Are you trying to justify Suvorov?

          Any revolution, uprising and civil war is a very bloody and cruel thing. Pugachev slaughtered entire families of officers and officials who did not change their oath to Catherine 2. The Bashkirs walked with Pugachev who simply massacred the male Russian population. And in the summer of 1917, rank-and-file Social Revolutionaries burned down all the landowners' estates and, with the threat of reprisals, forced the families of the landowners to leave the noble nests, while the leaders of the Social Revolutionaries delayed the adoption of the Decree on the Land.
    3. 0
      8 January 2021 10: 07
      Pugachev then who? The bandit with the money of the Turks and the French with the British raised a mutiny ...
      And the emissaries of France to Turkey were with him ...
    4. 0
      26 January 2021 18: 21
      Dear Sergei Averchenkov, Pugachev's rebellion was almost suppressed at the time of Suvorov's appearance on the theater of operations. So it's stupid to accuse him of cruelty. In addition, Pugachev and his gang were not angels. According to their deeds, they were rewarded. And there is no need to repeat the inventions of party ideologists of the early Soviet era about the struggle of the "progressive rebellious people" against the autocracy.
  8. +1
    28 November 2020 20: 33
    Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
    But this order is not for soldiers, for the command, which I think is not very correct

    Each order has its own statute, who can be awarded and for what actions. For example, a little more than 100 years ago, "soldier's Gerorgy", highly respected among the people, or 75 years ago, the Order of Glory could not be awarded to a general, no matter how much he wanted. Or there, the governor (regional committee secretary), even if he was close to Himself (like Voroshilov, or Zhdanov).
    But, accordingly, commanders' orders were awarded to generals, others were generally piecemeal (the Order of Victory, for example, generally strategic and political, except for our Marshals of Victory, they were awarded to the leaders of the countries of the anti-Hitler coalition, including those who "deserted" like the Romanian king).
    1. -1
      29 November 2020 04: 44
      For the military, the most remarkable award is the Order of the Red Star. If anyone could get a hero of the Soviet Union (quite deservedly), then the Red Star only for the military and not like more. One colonel told me this in a table conversation and I believe him, there was no point in lying to me.
  9. +2
    28 November 2020 21: 17
    I am not belittling the merits of Alexander Vasilyevich. But, he did not have time for Pugachev.
  10. +1
    28 November 2020 22: 22
    With the death of the great Suvorov, the Golden Age of Russian weapons ended.
    Throughout the XNUMXth century, they crushed Sweden, Prussia, whose armies were considered first-class + various Turks and Persians there.
    And most importantly, they fought not in numbers, but in skill, according to Suvorovski.

    And Russia started Х1Х with defeats. Austerlitz is the first in history lost outright general battle of the Russian army. Shock for Russian society.
    Until 1812, a series of continuous defeats by Napoleon. Borodino is, at best, a combat draw (the Russians retreated from the battlefield, not the French).
    The breakthrough of Napoleon with the guards through the Berezina was either an agreement (in which Kutuzov did not want to participate), or another mediocrity of the Russian generals.

    The Crimean War ... The Turks in the Balkans were barely finished. The earthworks of Plevna could not take for almost six months. The Russo-Japanese War, the defeat in WWI and the shameful Peace of Brest, etc. etc. However, maybe Brusilov is worthy ...

    Passion for shagistika in Prussian, they assured that there was no way without drill training. Like, "around, running, forehead against the wall ...".
    In the Israeli army, they don't do that, but they seem to be fighting well. We have not lost a single war ...

    In fairness, we note that a similar situation was in France. After Napoleon - nothing close and similar ...

    1. -1
      2 December 2020 18: 23
      Quote: Timofey Charuta
      The Russo-Japanese War, the defeat in WWI and the most shameful Peace of Brest, etc.

      In all these cases, defeats are the result of internal causes, and more specifically, of the revolutions of 1905 and 1917.
    2. 0
      8 December 2020 18: 11
      Quote: Timofey Charuta
      The Crimean War ... The Turks in the Balkans were barely finished.

      Under Nicholas 1, the scientific and technical revolution in the technology of iron and steel production was overlooked. It was believed that only Russia had uncut forests and in the 19th century it was a world energy power capable of producing massive quantities of charcoal for the manufacture of the world's best iron. But in England and France they learned how to coke coal and increased the production of steel so that it became possible to build steamships and battleships. It was the appearance of the French battleships that made it possible to defeat the fortifications of Kinburn near Nikolaev. Long-range English rifles and cannons made it possible to smash the Russian infantry in the Crimea and the Aland fortifications. The steamers made it possible to quickly concentrate massive artillery and amphibious forces at any point on the Black Sea and smash cities that were weakly defended in comparison with the Baltic Kronstadt. Only occasionally, due to the talent of the Russian commanders and the courage of their subordinates, it was possible to inflict some losses on the allies or to repulse their insufficiently massed attacks, as was the case near Taganrog, on the White Sea and on Kamchatka. Tsar-father Nicholas 2 also slept through the time when it was necessary to re-equip heavy artillery, organize the manufacture of high-explosive shells and create machine-tool construction in order to be able to quickly increase the production of modern weapons. For such slovenliness, bordering on treason, he was removed from office by the rebels, and in 1918 he was strictly but deservedly punished for embezzling state funds on ballerinas with low social responsibility, headed by Kshesinskaya, who, moreover, was a foreign agent of the French firm Schneider and contributed to the unpreparedness for war, patronizing the purchase of outdated French guns for their production at Russian factories to the detriment of more modern German models ... More recently, the modern Kshesinsky in the Ministry of Defense carried out reforms and were engaged in the sale of surplus military equipment created by the backbreaking work of the previous generation at the expense of the construction of drones, airfields and modern aircraft weapons.
  11. +1
    29 November 2020 05: 32
    Quote: Timofey Charuta
    With the death of the great Suvorov, the Golden Age of Russian weapons ended.
    Throughout the XNUMXth century, they crushed Sweden, Prussia, whose armies were considered first-class + various Turks and Persians there.
    And most importantly, they fought not in numbers, but in skill, according to Suvorovski.

    And Russia started Х1Х with defeats. Austerlitz is the first in history lost outright general battle of the Russian army. Shock for Russian society.
    Until 1812, a series of continuous defeats by Napoleon. Borodino is, at best, a combat draw (the Russians retreated from the battlefield, not the French).
    The breakthrough of Napoleon with the guards through the Berezina was either an agreement (in which Kutuzov did not want to participate), or another mediocrity of the Russian generals.

    The Crimean War ... The Turks in the Balkans were barely finished. The earthworks of Plevna could not take for almost six months. The Russo-Japanese War, the defeat in WWI and the shameful Peace of Brest, etc. etc. However, maybe Brusilov is worthy ...

    Passion for shagistika in Prussian, they assured that there was no way without drill training. Like, "around, running, forehead against the wall ...".
    In the Israeli army, they don't do that, but they seem to be fighting well. We have not lost a single war ...

    In fairness, we note that a similar situation was in France. After Napoleon - nothing close and similar ...


    Superficial assessment of events. They mixed everything in one heap - both military events and politics ... It is necessary to evaluate not only individual events or battles in the theater of war, but also to evaluate everything as a whole - the final result. Russia was able to control such vast territories not only with the help of weapons and the military. We have fought always and always successfully, a lost battle is not a lost war.
  12. 0
    29 November 2020 08: 55
    “At the beginning of April, siege artillery arrived, and mine galleries began to be led under the walls. Food supplies were running low. Resistance has become meaningless. Suvorov offered Shuazi an honorable surrender. "

    If the besieged were doomed, why offer an honorable surrender? There is no answer in the article.
    1. 0
      8 December 2020 18: 20
      Quote: Marine Engineer
      If the besieged were doomed, why offer an honorable surrender?

      The walls would be blown up to 5 meters and a brutal hand-to-hand fight would begin behind this breach, where the losses would be one to one. And so the French and Poles surrendered their weapons. The Poles apparently fought for the glory of Russian arms under the Russian banners against the Turks as forgiven and reformed fellow citizens of the empire.
  13. 0
    30 November 2020 01: 23
    Quote: ddmm09
    We have fought always and always successfully, a lost battle is not a lost war.

    Always and everywhere - how is it? Won the Crimean War, defeated the Japs in 1905, finished WWI in Berlin?
    Patriotism is a good thing, I myself am, but not contrary to the facts.

  14. 0
    30 November 2020 19: 23
    Generally, drill from that time was vital. Only by keeping the formation could the infantry of that time be able to effectively fight and not be worn out by the cavalry. Therefore, they screwed them up on the parade ground.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"