Military Review

A new batch of modernized T-90M Proryv tanks delivered to the Ministry of Defense

79
A new batch of modernized T-90M Proryv tanks delivered to the Ministry of Defense

The Ministry of Defense received a new batch of modernized tanks T-90M "Breakthrough". This was reported by the press service of the military department.


According to the report, the entire batch of T-90M tanks has already arrived at the troops. At the same time, the Ministry of Defense does not report the number of vehicles received and in which parts they were delivered.

A batch of T-90M Proryv tanks, equipped with a 125-mm smooth-bore gun-launcher, arrived at the troops. This system, used with a guided weapon system, is capable of using all existing tank ammunition of a given caliber. Combined arms and tank formations continue to receive upgraded T-72B3 tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, as well as armored personnel carriers BTR-82A and BTR-82AM

- said in a statement.

In addition, a batch of T-72B3M and T-80BVM tanks entered the Kazan Higher Tank Command School, where future tank officers are trained.

The T-90М tank was developed as part of the Breakthrough-3 development work and is a deep modernization of the T-90 with increased combat and operational characteristics.

In the course of modernization, a new turret module with a 90-mm gun of increased survivability and accuracy was installed on the T-125M. A remote-controlled machine gun installation caliber 12,7-mm is installed on the turret. In addition, the new tank is equipped with a highly automated digital fire control system that provides search, recognition, auto-tracking and hitting targets.
79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Orel
    Orel 26 November 2020 18: 56
    -8
    So far, the T-90 is quite enough, the capabilities are good, but the budget will not stretch the "Armata", it is expensive
    1. Antifreeze
      Antifreeze 26 November 2020 19: 01
      +25
      Quote: Orel
      "Armata" budget will not stretch, it is expensive

      Not only expensive, but damp as well. Let them bring while time is running out
      1. Leeds
        Leeds 26 November 2020 21: 46
        +3
        Quote: Antifreeze
        Quote: Orel
        "Armata" budget will not stretch, it is expensive

        Not only expensive, but damp as well. Let them bring while time is running out

        From meeting with flowers the gentlemen turned into justifiers.
        Although, as Andryusha Arshavin said, when the national team has done well: "Your expectations are your problems."
        Yes, I had, like many others, a sin, I represented Armata in the army, at least a couple of hundred, which Afganit knocks down arrogance from the Americans and Israelis, who claim that Jav and Spike are certain deaths to all our armor. That's bad luck, I'm sorry.
        1. Viktor Sergeev
          Viktor Sergeev 26 November 2020 21: 55
          -12%
          Tell me, why would the troops of Armata? I thought it was not tanks that shoot down arrogance, but ICBMs. In the coming decades, Russia, in principle, cannot be attacked, and for local wars, T90 or even modernized T72 is enough. Armata is more likely to turn out to be a transitional tank, a laboratory, if they are delivered, then about 100 years in 5.
          1. Boris ⁣ Shaver
            Boris ⁣ Shaver 26 November 2020 22: 24
            +18
            Quote: Victor Sergeev
            Russia in the coming decades in principle cannot be attacked

            Quote: Victor Sergeev
            arrogance is shot down not by tanks, but by ICBMs

            You need to gather strength and, pulling your head out of the sand, directly and boldly look at the surrounding reality. From the latter - the same "McCain", it was not formidable ICBMs that were ousted, but a much more modest BOD. Of the recent wars on our territory, the Wahhabis were driven out of Chechnya, defending the country's territorial integrity, not with the help of ICBMs. Etc.
            Without ICBMs, of course, not how. But ICBMs by themselves, without normal "conventional" weapons, will not cope either. Both should be at a normal level.
            We will have to drench the shortcomings of "conventional" weapons with the blood of soldiers. Here and there.
            1. Viktor Sergeev
              Viktor Sergeev 27 November 2020 17: 20
              +2
              And no one hides his head in the sand. I wrote there from above: T72 and T90 are perfectly suitable for local wars, Armata was created for a war with a powerful enemy: NATO. Why a tank with systems designed to attack large units against the Wahhabis?
          2. Leeds
            Leeds 26 November 2020 23: 26
            +11
            Quote: Victor Sergeev
            Tell me, why would the troops of Armata? I thought it was not tanks that shoot down arrogance, but ICBMs. In the coming decades, Russia, in principle, cannot be attacked, and for local wars, T90 or even modernized T72 is enough. Armata is more likely to turn out to be a transitional tank, a laboratory, if they are delivered, then about 100 years in 5.

            Will it burst into flames in Ukraine, in Central Asia, will we handle ICBMs? Or will we go in 72? You can grab such slaps in the face and even lose your teeth, but do not dare to put everything on the line and press the red button. There is no need to make excuses, you need to say where we really are and what are the prospects. If you don’t need Armata, what Mpch did we use for our own grandmothers?
            1. shahor
              shahor 27 November 2020 15: 52
              -2
              Quote: Leeds
              If you don’t need Armata, what Mpch did we use for our own money?

              It was not you who developed it. But because of your grandmother. Dexterity is mastered. Armata ... ay ...?
              1. Viktor Sergeev
                Viktor Sergeev 27 November 2020 17: 17
                +1
                Technique requires development, testing of components, concepts, weapons, ammunition, etc. That is why both we and the Americans sometimes create something that later does not go into production, and often fails in the army. But you, liberals, who steal everything from except you, do not understand this, how can you not understand why sometimes states give other countries loans to buy their weapons, realizing that there will be no return or donate equipment.
      2. Boris ⁣ Shaver
        Boris ⁣ Shaver 26 November 2020 22: 14
        +1
        Quote: Antifreeze
        time is running out

        And let the whole world wait (c)
        1. Captain45
          Captain45 27 November 2020 11: 32
          0
          Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
          And let the whole world wait (c)

          "While the Russian tsar is fishing, Europe can wait!", Alexander III said at one time lol
          1. Boris ⁣ Shaver
            Boris ⁣ Shaver 28 November 2020 15: 05
            -3
            Quote: Captain45
            "While the Russian tsar is fishing, Europe can wait!", Alexander III said at one time

            I'm afraid that finishing the "Armata" will take a little longer than fishing.
    2. Thrifty
      Thrifty 26 November 2020 19: 05
      -20%
      Eagle, do not take Armata in vain, otherwise he will dream all night! wassat Seriously, its not the budget, its economy "does not pull"! The lack of its own microelectronics for the critical elements of the tank comes out sideways for us, therefore, the maximum, "screwdriver assembly"! Also, KAZ is questionable, for the same reason. ..the lack of a reliable engine, and not that "masterpiece" that is stuck together on the knee. .. the list goes on and on. ..
      1. vitvit123
        vitvit123 26 November 2020 20: 20
        +6
        If there is a screwdriver assembly, then it is very interesting, and who should supply the large parts ("assemblies")? From which the car will be assembled using the screwdriver assembly method ...
    3. farm2009
      farm2009 26 November 2020 19: 07
      +37
      It is not expensive for Russia, 2 helicopter carriers were ordered for $ 1,3 billion, but they cannot make a normal order for T14 armata for 4 million / piece. I suspect it's not about the money.
      1. Orel
        Orel 26 November 2020 19: 11
        +1
        Quote: farm2009
        2 helicopter carriers for $ 1,3 billion ordered


        This is a separate question, of course, ships are clearly not cheap
        1. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 26 November 2020 20: 53
          +5
          But meaningless. But the main thing is that the OVR is in complete collapse in the fleet - mine defense ships are not able to deal with modern mines, anti-submarine ships of Project 1124 have served on average 30+ years, there are no modern patrol aircraft and are not planned. Only the Kh-35 anti-ship missiles are in service with aviation. The fleet pompously refused from the MPA (though before the MPA was brought to the handle), thereby throwing its most formidable sword into the landfill.
      2. Aag
        Aag 26 November 2020 20: 13
        +1
        "... I suspect it's not about the money ...."
        And in their number ...
      3. Viktor Sergeev
        Viktor Sergeev 26 November 2020 21: 57
        +2
        Here the point is in the absolute uselessness of Armata at the present time. As they said about ZIS2: there are no goals, but the price is high.
      4. Boris Chernikov
        Boris Chernikov 27 November 2020 12: 27
        -1
        1) Armata is being tested in the troops .. they just barely take them off, because it is forbidden, therefore, it turns out a vacuum of information that everyone thinks "oh, the topic is closed" .. although they are working on the tank 2) the tank is new and complex and teach tankers and technicians will have to be new .. so it is unlikely that there will be many of them .. even if, say, next year they will be purchased .. then the maximum will be about 2 battalion kits per year
    4. Eldorado
      Eldorado 26 November 2020 19: 14
      -39%
      Do we need this "Armata" after Karabakh? The Armenian experience must be taken into account. Everyone saw perfectly how the Armenian tanks were burning! What will Armata do against Bayraktar?
      It seems to me that it is better for us to invest funds and production forces in the development and production of all types of UAVs, and not MBT.
      1. Cottodraton
        Cottodraton 26 November 2020 19: 18
        +27
        Damn, how much can you scare about these batsraktars? What did Karabakh show to whom and what?
        Armenia did not really have air defense. I suspect that even those destroyed c300 and tori were not ready for battle.
        There was not even a MANPADS to be seen. Stupidly huddled near the trenches, where the goodies regularly flew in ... However, there are no longer "bayraktars", but southern carelessness and slovenliness
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 26 November 2020 19: 28
          -18%
          Karabakh should be forgotten as a bad dream.
          And think about something old, reliable, tested.
          And drones are from fantasy. wassat
          1. Tusv
            Tusv 26 November 2020 20: 01
            +1
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Karabakh should be forgotten as a bad dream.

            In Baku or in Yerevan? So the RF Armed Forces will try to make sure that peaceful Karabakh is remembered, and not as a territory. And our brigade commander said that We did not rearm from s-125 to s-300 because of this war. The capacitor factory in Stepanakert was covered. Perhaps the best special operation of the Yankees against Us
            1. voyaka uh
              voyaka uh 26 November 2020 21: 07
              -13%
              "Perhaps the best special operation of the Yankees against Us" ////
              ----
              No. The best special operation of the Yankees is to convince to buy in large quantities
              useless S-400 instead of widespread production of useful Su-57.
              1. Cottodraton
                Cottodraton 27 November 2020 08: 29
                +2
                It is better to buy kosher UAVs from Israel, from the sale of which some forum users (we will not point the finger) probably have a gesheft;)
            2. Polite Moose
              Polite Moose 27 November 2020 00: 38
              +11
              Quote: Tusv
              The capacitor factory in Stepanakert was covered. Perhaps the best special operation of the Yankees against Us

              Armenian electrolytic capacitors were the scourge of Soviet radio equipment, the main and often the only cause of civil electronics malfunctions (we could, of course, be a military serviceman of a different quality). A S-300 with Armenian capacitors would be a curse for techies and combat crews. So don't scold the Yankees too hard. Maybe there was simply no other way to rid the world of this scourge. laughing
          2. Aag
            Aag 26 November 2020 20: 15
            +6
            Few people could appreciate your irony.
            1. voyaka uh
              voyaka uh 26 November 2020 21: 00
              -11%
              Thanks. I will definitely add "ha ha ha" after my ironic
              comments (as is customary in Japan: joking - say ha ha ha).
              1. Tusv
                Tusv 26 November 2020 23: 04
                +1
                Quote: voyaka uh
                Thanks. I will definitely add "ha ha ha" after my ironic
                comments

                After idiotic jokes, "Shovel" is usually added. So funnier
                1. Cottodraton
                  Cottodraton 27 November 2020 08: 30
                  0
                  Better as in "Borat" - not very
          3. Uncle Vanya Susanin
            Uncle Vanya Susanin 26 November 2020 20: 17
            +14
            Karabakh should be forgotten as a bad dream.
            And think about something old, reliable, tested.
            And drones are from fantasy.


            The stupidest comment, did not expect from you request
          4. Cyril G ...
            Cyril G ... 26 November 2020 20: 56
            +6
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Karabakh should be forgotten as a bad dream.
            And think about something old, reliable, tested.
            And drones are from fantasy


            Exhale the beaver. (from.)
            At the beginning of this year, our ground forces received at least 2300 drones capable of solving reconnaissance and control missions for artillery and missile forces. In each MRBR we have a regular detachment of unmanned aircraft.
          5. Sasha Minakov
            Sasha Minakov 26 November 2020 20: 59
            +3
            Hmm :-) Lord, how many of you are couch. Outskirts have holy jewels, you have drones))))
        2. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 26 November 2020 21: 00
          +2
          Quote: Cottodraton
          Damn, how much can you scare about these batsraktars? What did Karabakh show to whom and what?


          Like what, what you need to have a military air defense system. The Armenians did not have it, from the word in general. I am almost sure there have been no rocket firing for several years,

          tor-s were not ready for battle.


          See the cutscene with the destruction of Thor, it's just indescribable ...
      2. Zhenya Khazarsky
        Zhenya Khazarsky 26 November 2020 19: 20
        +14
        Well ... for example will crush kung control caterpillars good
        As the saying goes: "The best air defense is our tanks at the enemy airfield."
      3. figwam
        figwam 26 November 2020 19: 26
        +9
        Quote: El Dorado
        What will Armata do against Bayraktar?

        For this there is a military air defense. Not a single drone reaches our bases in Syria.
      4. Thrifty
        Thrifty 26 November 2020 19: 45
        -4
        El Dorado - the lack of air defense, this is the reason for the lost war by the Armenians in Karabakh. Bayraktors in Syria beat our Armor, Torah and Buki in batches. UAVs are needed, especially drums, but they are also targets for integrated military air defense!
      5. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 26 November 2020 20: 51
        +7
        Tanks do not fight against UAVs when will it reach people ??? It is not their task to fight them, but the military air defense of which there was simply no in Karabakh !!! Everyone saw how tanks were burning, which stood still even without disguise, I am silent about the most common cover. The Armenians themselves are to blame for all the losses. T 14 or T 90 does not matter when interaction and reconnaissance is completely failed !!! Send anything into battle with such leadership of the troops, everything will be destroyed anyway.
      6. Cyril G ...
        Cyril G ... 26 November 2020 21: 03
        +1
        Quote: El Dorado
        saw how Armenian tanks burned!


        So the Azerbaijani ones also burned no less epic. As for the need to invest money, first of all, in aviation, including unmanned aircraft, the creation of new WTO models and the massive provision of troops with them, the reconnaissance system and central control and air defense systems.
      7. JD1979
        JD1979 26 November 2020 21: 30
        -2
        Quote: El Dorado
        Do we need this "Armata" after Karabakh? The Armenian experience must be taken into account.

        Does your ten-year experience of chasing Kolda speak?
        Quote: El Dorado
        Everyone saw perfectly how the Armenian tanks were burning!

        Everyone saw just as well how Azerbaijani tanks, BMP-3, armored personnel carriers and Turkish equipment burned without any UAVs and other UFOs, but only thanks to good old ATGMs and artillery. So which side of the tree of development will we go?)))
        Quote: El Dorado
        What will Armata do against Bayraktar?

        You are one of those who compares a spherical horse in a vacuum. Under the conditions of a military operation, the RA MBT will be covered by the military air defense - you know, there ... (well, or google for help) starting from Verba and increasing: TORs, BUKs, Armor and so on. Maybe, if sometime in the distant, wonderful future, the 57mm projectile with controlled detonation is finished, and the exhibition and museum exhibit with the Baikal module will be able to show what a 57mm caliber is capable of against small airplanes))
        Quote: El Dorado
        It seems to me that it is better for us to invest funds and production forces in the development and production of all types of UAVs, and not MBT.

        It seems to me that we need to start investing in the education system very quickly.
        PS: the problem is not the production of UAVs as such. The problem is the absence (as always, since the revolution ...) of engines and the collapse of the microelectronic industry (Chubais and Rosnano prüvet). And without controls and engines, you can only make kites and paper airplanes.
      8. Boris Chernikov
        Boris Chernikov 27 November 2020 12: 29
        -2
        why not recall the Idlib experience or Libya, when these bayraktars burned very well?
    5. Svarog
      Svarog 26 November 2020 20: 23
      -14%
      Quote: Orel
      So far, the T-90 is quite enough, the capabilities are good, but the budget will not stretch the "Armata", it is expensive

      Of course .. our officials and oligarchs have tightened their belts .. the budget will not stretch ..
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 26 November 2020 20: 53
        +1
        Political mantras do not make it possible to understand that the military tests are not finished and no one will buy such equipment?)
      2. Sasha Minakov
        Sasha Minakov 26 November 2020 20: 59
        -3
        is there anything specifically?) And then Dobroslav does not like when Svarog is crumpled in the sue)
  2. Prahlad
    Prahlad 26 November 2020 19: 00
    +3
    It's a pity of course that there is no KAZ ...
    1. bk0010
      bk0010 26 November 2020 19: 16
      +2
      Quote: Prahlad
      It's a pity of course that there is no KAZ ...
      IMHO, if we have already installed the radar on the tank, then it should be used to the full as a means of guidance, and as a surveillance system, and not only to provide active protection.
    2. deniso
      deniso 26 November 2020 19: 39
      -3
      Quote: Prahlad
      It's a pity of course that there is no KAZ ...



      It contradicts the current combat regulations of the ground forces and the state.

      So before changing the regulations,

      it cannot be used in a field army.

      This is not for you to paint in toys.
    3. keeper03
      keeper03 26 November 2020 19: 48
      -2
      Without KAZ it will be like in Kabarah! First, they neutralize the air, then the earth goes on the attack, if in mind! soldier
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 26 November 2020 20: 55
        0
        Come on?) And how will KAZ help if, knowing about its presence, they simply throw a few ammunition on the tank for guaranteed destruction? ) maybe you still need to understand that the tanks are fighting their targets, but for example, various air defense systems should cover them?
  3. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 26 November 2020 19: 02
    +7
    it is very correct that cadets are trained on new equipment (including new versions of modernization) ... money in the training of commanders is necessary and important to invest ... this is the guarantee of a strong army ...
  4. Sancho_SP
    Sancho_SP 26 November 2020 19: 02
    +1
    And this, it turns out, is how many tanks are produced per year?
    1. Livonetc
      Livonetc 26 November 2020 19: 13
      +8
      160 T-90M MBTs were contracted.
      How many T-90Ms have already been produced, I did not find information.
      And on the T-90 delivered earlier to the Russian army, the information is as follows.
      "According to open domestic and foreign sources, at present there are about 350 T-90 (A) tanks in units of the Russian army. About 200 more vehicles are in storage."
      https://topwar.ru/167561-t-90m-ispytanija-projdeny-skoro-sluzhba.html
      1. Stavorg
        Stavorg 26 November 2020 19: 50
        0
        Quote: Livonetc
        160 T-90M MBTs were contracted.
        How many T-90Ms have already been produced, I did not find information.

        And I think it's good bully And then all the information on weapons was previously leaked into the network and it began ..
      2. Sancho_SP
        Sancho_SP 26 November 2020 19: 51
        +1
        I mean, the overall productivity of the plant is relatively small. I wonder by what factor it is limited. Hardly metalworking. Engines?
        1. PSih2097
          PSih2097 27 November 2020 06: 03
          0
          Quote: Sancho_SP
          Hardly metalworking. Engines?

          budget resources.
          1. Sancho_SP
            Sancho_SP 29 November 2020 08: 57
            0
            Hardly. These are state-owned enterprises, salaries will still be paid there, regardless of the load.
  5. Eldorado
    Eldorado 26 November 2020 19: 12
    -2
    Already the second batch of troops! good drinks
  6. Yuriy71
    Yuriy71 26 November 2020 19: 14
    +3
    Awesome "experts" from above have spoken out ....)))
    1. Blackgrifon
      Blackgrifon 26 November 2020 19: 44
      +1
      They are like that :) I'm scared to imagine what would be on the forum if the Internet was in 1973 :))
    2. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 27 November 2020 00: 12
      +4
      Quote: Yuriy71
      "experts" from above have spoken out ....)))

      This is normal. - network "bohemia" anneals, who in what way. yes Immediately, due to the lack of suitable fresh materials, local "oppas" settled down with their dirty and rotten polity. laughing
  7. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 26 November 2020 19: 14
    +4
    Excellent on performance characteristics car, forward))

    On the left in the photo is a loaf, it will always be in service on a campaign laughing
  8. Stavorg
    Stavorg 26 November 2020 19: 47
    0
    New batch of modernized tanks T-90M "Breakthrough"

    I am very impressed with the name of the tanks "Breakthrough" .. Russia needs such tanks now, they surrounded us from all sides soldier
    "Armats" are expensive, but I think they will not be put into production yet .. Russia cannot do without a tank fist in our vast territories and cunning neighbors. hi
  9. noname1117
    noname1117 26 November 2020 19: 59
    +1
    I wonder what batch, like last time, 30 cars? And most likely the modernization of the old ... Unfortunately, at this rate, the T-72 will have to ride until the middle of the century
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 26 November 2020 20: 57
      +1
      Well, do you chidimo know some kind of zitry way to replace several thousand tanks with new ones in a couple of years?)
      1. noname1117
        noname1117 26 November 2020 22: 01
        -3
        Against the backdrop of contracts worth hundreds of billions for the Air Force and Navy, 60 modified tanks per year look really strange and pathetic. Instead of an extra nuclear submarine, it was possible to double the number of T-90s in the army. It is hoped that this is a cunning plan with the expectation of an early mass production of the T-14.
  10. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 26 November 2020 20: 15
    0
    That we have a variety of rags. T 72, T 80 and T 90. And Armata in military trials. It looks like each enemy in its own type of tanks. Who is weaker than those T72 we will equalize and grow. Well, and Armata, when we bring to mind for our sworn beloved partners , it is not always the same for them to fight with someone else's hands.? soldier drinks good
  11. yfast
    yfast 26 November 2020 20: 32
    -8
    T-90 - tank of the nineties. At least put a dress on him.
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 26 November 2020 20: 58
      +1
      Do you know new models of tanks in the world, who has it?) There apparently just all stupid times tanks of the last century are constantly being modernized?)))
  12. Russ
    Russ 26 November 2020 20: 32
    +1
    At the same time, the Ministry of Defense does not report the number of vehicles received and in which parts they were delivered.

    Should they? belaytell, show and let me try? wassat
  13. Constanty
    Constanty 26 November 2020 21: 03
    +1
    My impression is that the title and introduction are not entirely correct.
    Although the T-90M itself is in fact a deeply modernized version of the T-90, if I understand correctly, this article is about new tanks. New copies, and not, for example, the earlier T-90 or T-90A upgraded to this level?
    Please explain to the author or someone who has such information.

    By the way, this is probably one of the best tanks at the moment.
  14. Falcond
    Falcond 26 November 2020 21: 31
    +3
    28 tanks in 7 companies, 13 in each ...
  15. Pavel57
    Pavel57 26 November 2020 22: 22
    0
    Quote: Cyril G ...
    Only the X-35 anti-ship missiles are in service with aviation.

    Have you already run out of X-31?
  16. tarakan
    tarakan 26 November 2020 22: 38
    -2
    Turks in their time in Syria promoted their UAVs, but blown away
  17. Hermit21
    Hermit21 26 November 2020 23: 10
    -1
    Probably the second battalion kit. Not bad, not bad
  18. Falcon5555
    Falcon5555 26 November 2020 23: 25
    0
    Can the driver get out of this tank through his hatch at any position of the gun? It seems - no. sad
  19. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 27 November 2020 02: 53
    -1
    Behind all this "hurray-roar" it is really difficult to assess how really good / bad / sufficient in modern conditions of the struggle of the complexes of forces - the T90 tank in general and the "Breakthrough" in particular. Probably, it is sufficient for defense and will remain so for some time. Another thing is the defense of WHERE and FROM WHOM, and FROM WHAT, that is, under what variants of the emergence and development of the conflict. And here it may well turn out that tanks may be of little use to us at all ..
  20. zwlad
    zwlad 27 November 2020 08: 16
    -1
    It's good that we entered the troops!
    We must continue the systematic rearmament further!
    The enemy does not sleep!
  21. Kapkan
    Kapkan 27 November 2020 12: 07
    0
    At the same time, the Ministry of Defense does not report the number of vehicles received and in which parts they were delivered.

    The media, or whoever you are there ... I beg you, do not write such phrases, so as not to embarrass yourself.