Russia's political future is predicted only until 2024: causes and possible consequences

133


The material is published in the section "News"for technical reasons.



Vladimir Putin's next presidential term ends in 2024. Everyone is already accustomed to the fact that Vladimir Vladimirovich is positioned by the domestic pro-government media as "our everything", and there is no alternative to which there can be.

Era border


But the era of Putin's power cannot last forever. If only because of the finiteness of the life of any person. And the head of state is no exception in this case. No matter how many times the possibility of staying in power is extended, the years take their toll. And even if a person physically continues to exist, this does not necessarily mean that he will retain the ability to govern. Here it would be more to think about the United States with their Trump and Biden, who are under 160 for two ...

Meanwhile, any predictions in modern Russia are made only until 2024. And this is very scary.

It never occurs to anyone to predict the development of the United States until the end of the presidential term of the same Donald Trump or Joe Biden. But in Russia such a system of state power has developed that the entire strategy of the development of the fatherland is directly linked to the personality of the head of the country.

One does not need to closely monitor the media space in order to record a curious objective fact: no one of the government officials ever speaks seriously about Russia without Putin. And this is one of the Kremlin's biggest mistakes.

Strategic barrier


The absence of a clear scheme for transferring power from the incumbent president to the future, the shortage of candidates for the role of successors to the post of head of state can play against our country and its future.

First of all, the question arises: does the Kremlin have no worthy candidate? Or is Putin going at the very last moment to act "like Yeltsin" - to take out "from the casket" a new, hitherto little-known personality, and declare her his successor? Unclear.

But the question of a successor is not so bad.

Much more serious is the lack of strategic planning for the development of the state. This is probably due to the fact that in the government, and on the political scene in general, no one can imagine what will happen in Russia if Putin leaves the presidency?

Should we expect coups?


The options for the subsequent development of events are very numerous. This is the transfer of power to someone from his entourage, of course, legitimized by the elections. And the “summit coup”, as a result of which one of the current high-ranking officials may also come to power. And an "external coup", as a result of which a part of the elite can put an imaginary oppositionist in the presidential chair, who will imitate the fight against corruption and privileges.

The role of "Yeltsin 2.0" can be played by a figure who has appeared from nowhere and is new for the Russian political field, whom the media structures (if such an order is received) will instantly make an All-Russian celebrity.

There are also sadder scenarios that need not be voiced.

So, in the event of any unexpected consequences of Putin's departure from the presidency, changes in the life of the country can be so significant that now no one is undertaking to seriously develop any strategies for the development of the state for the period after 2024.

Stability guarantee after 2024


However, strategists can already safely look into 2030. Since there are only a little over three years left until 2024, and Vladimir Vladimirovich is still clearly determined to continue his presidential career.

And most likely he will go for a new term. If nothing happens. Not for the same, in the end, did they change the Constitution so as not to take advantage of the general motive of its transformation? But even if so, the forecasts for the future (after the 24th and especially until the 30s) are vague, which cannot but cause concern for a country like Russia.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

133 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +30
    25 November 2020 11: 58
    Let people legally earn good money, and therefore increase their material wealth - there will be a future after 2024. After all, the thieves do not allow this. This is the system. And if you keep people in a strict collar - there is no future.
    1. -1
      25 November 2020 12: 02
      Quote: x.andvlad
      Let people legally earn good money, and therefore increase their material wealth - there will be a future after 2024. After all, the thieves do not allow this. And if you keep people in a strict collar - there is no future.

      Russia had a great past (with completely different incomes) - there will be a great future. Do not doubt!
      1. -4
        25 November 2020 12: 18
        Putin will be at the helm of exactly 24 waves of coronavirus smile
      2. +31
        25 November 2020 12: 20
        Oh yeah!
        “Why did the old regime fall? Mainly because they fought with the dissatisfied, and not with the reasons that caused the dissatisfaction. But the people who supported Russia were unhappy. Therefore, when they fought with them, they fought with the best, and the state administration was entrusted to nonentities who knew how to flatter and calm ”(August 2, 1917). VV Shulgin, deputy of the Second, Third and Fourth State Dumas of the Russian Empire.
        What has changed in public administration in 100 years?
        1. +17
          25 November 2020 12: 39
          What has changed in public administration in 100 years?
          Nothing, the Chubais have become bolder, their roof is impenetrable.
          1. +14
            25 November 2020 14: 47
            It never occurs to anyone to predict the development of the United States until the end of the presidential term of the same Donald Trump or Joe Biden. But in Russia such a system of state power has developed that the whole strategy of development of the fatherland directly communicates with the personality of the head of the country.

            Well, as in any dictatorial regime, where power is usurped in one hand. Where the Constitution is violated and then changed for themselves. Where the political clearing is completely cleared from worthy competitors, as a result of which there is a negative selection to power.
            1. +9
              25 November 2020 15: 33
              negative selection to power.

              Ascending garbage chute
          2. 0
            26 November 2020 13: 21
            Only Chubais is nowhere to be found in Rosnano. And so of course.
        2. +3
          25 November 2020 16: 13
          Quote: unaha
          fought with the dissatisfied, not with the reasons that caused the dissatisfaction.

          Not entirely true. For example, the same Bolsheviks perfectly understood the reasons for the discontent of the people and therefore began to build a completely new society. Basically, the dissatisfied were and always will be, even in paradise. Dissatisfaction with everything (about 10% of the population) is an integral part of any modern society. The worst thing is not that people are always dissatisfied with something, but that these dissatisfied are very active. For some, this is due to innate adventurism (also well-paid by "friends" from abroad), in others, unripe youthful maximalism, in others, in general, mental illness and senile marasmus. On discontent alone, state administration cannot be built, as they sacredly believe in Ukraine, or "new fighters for democracy" in Belarus. On the contrary, the state is built by people who are purely pragmatic, hard-working, balanced, educated, well-mannered, and so on. "Dissatisfied" bawlers with a touch of intelligence (whether even without it, so to speak from the people), can only destroy everything. As for the present times, then completely reshaping society, referring to a group of inadequate personalities, than dissatisfied with something, would be a big stupidity. Yes, they destroyed the old communist ideals, began to build something new, like "capitalism with a human face", it doesn't quite work out, but excuse me, isn't that what we all wanted in the late 80s? As they say, what they fought for, they ran into it. By the way, Russia hasn't done very badly yet. In pain, with losses, far from ideal, but bearable. In contrast to the neighbors, who, in the struggle for abstract ideals and general discontent, against the background of total Russophobia, completely destroyed their countries.
          1. -2
            25 November 2020 21: 02
            Quote: orionvitt
            On discontent alone, state administration cannot be built, as they sacredly believe in Ukraine, or "new fighters for democracy" in Belarus. On the contrary, the state is built by people who are purely pragmatic, hard-working, balanced, educated, well-mannered, and so on.

            Absolutely right. I would like to note that now the ability to quickly manage the processes in the country is much more important for the leader of the country than his ideological views, and we see this throughout the post-Soviet space. And Putin just learned to quickly respond to emerging problems, although of course there will always be dissatisfied people, in the same situation in Karabakh.
          2. 0
            26 November 2020 12: 56
            It’s normal, so if I don’t like the current state of affairs, then I’m either paid for, or the old insanity of IK Believe me, I’m an ordinary citizen who goes shopping, a pharmacy, pays utilities and who is tired of constant lies from the highest levels And what will you order me to do .? Somewhere to complain, contact.? You yourself understand where they will send me. That is why I say that the change of power is simply necessary. And there should not be pocket parties, but parties from the people can be self-nominated. Believe me, I'm not worse than our current leader. What to do then.? The eternal Russian question
            1. 0
              26 November 2020 15: 29
              Quote: Sergey Nikiforov
              Normal, which means if I do not like the current state of affairs, then I am either paid, or old insanity

              As O. Bender said, contact the League of Sexual Reforms. It's one thing to be dissatisfied with something (there are no absolutely satisfied people), another thing for the sake of your own dissatisfaction, understandable only to you, for the glory of slogans (like deceitful democracy, or abstract idiotic "change of power"), to shake the country in which you live. If you have not noticed that such actions have not helped anyone in the world yet, and vice versa, have plunged countries into crises, devastation and wars, then you should definitely go to a psychiatrist. Due to the general insanity and the inability to understand the world in which you live. Watch ads, it's yours.
              1. 0
                26 November 2020 17: 52
                I can quote Ilf and Petrov no worse than you. But only the basic postulate of a real democratic state is the real change of power.Zeroing and other antics is an authoritarian state, but it is definitely characterized by degradation if you think that everything that we have all achieved together in 20 years and we want to reach 15 more and there is a chapel of dreams, then, of course, our concepts of normal development are diametrically opposite
                1. 0
                  26 November 2020 23: 11
                  Quote: Sergey Nikiforov
                  Zeroing and other antics is an authoritarian state

                  A strong state, by definition, must be totalitarian (in what form is another question). For example, the United States, or Great Britain, only declares itself as a democracy, in fact, the level of totalitarianism is off the charts. And in general, as practice has shown, democracy itself is at its core, an outright fiction for the narrow-minded inhabitants, an empty shell. He himself was like that, about thirty years ago. It (the declared democracy) has never been and never will be. But you can, in the struggle for "democracy", you can bomb someone, or overthrow, for "insufficient democracy." Here, "democracy" works, I agree.
                  1. 0
                    27 November 2020 08: 19
                    Well, in the overwhelming totalitarianism of ASHA and in a nightmare, you will not dream of zeroing out And Sarkozy for some reason sits on the bench, you are confusing real democracy with authoritarianism and this is your problem In general, with your views that have formed over the past 30 years, you are in motion Constantinople to Malofeev Black Hundreds needed there
                    1. +1
                      27 November 2020 14: 53
                      What is my problem is that, like the majority, at one time he was mistaken, being fooled by the sweet speeches of foreign propagandists. As a result, the country was taken away from us, in addition, under the rant about "democratic values", they washed it in blood. Now, only people in the last stage of childhood infantilism can believe in democracy and "Western freedoms". In real life, there is no place for a fairy tale and all the events of recent decades clearly show this to us. I can understand when at twenty you fly in pink dreams and the world seems to be made only for you, but a person who does not get rid of illusions with age is just ......... (censorship). So, everything that the communists told us about the bright communist future turned out to be fiction (not yet), but what they told us about the west turned out to be the purest truth. hi
      3. 0
        25 November 2020 12: 23
        [quote] Russia had a great past (with completely different incomes) - there will be a great future. [quote]
        A good slogan, only missing in the middle - "... there is a great present ...". Existing generations of Russian citizens are waiting for this in the first place.

        [quote = Game specialist 2] Much more serious is the lack of strategic planning for the development of the state. This is probably due to the fact that in the authorities, and on the political scene in general, no one can imagine what will happen in Russia if Putin leaves the presidency? [/ Quote]
        In the USSR, there was strategic planning, according to which communism was supposed to come in 1980, but as we now see, without good executors, the plans of the strategists went to dust. Hence it follows that no matter how good a strategic plan is, it cannot be implemented without an economic base and ideological executors.
        So, of course, you can blame the current political leadership of the country, but you also need to understand what goals the country should strive for, so that the majority of the country's population, who will have to implement them, can believe in these goals and plans.
        1. 0
          25 November 2020 12: 42
          You should know that the present is never great due to the many points of view and political views due to the lack of complete information. How the same facts and events are perceived by an ordinary citizen who has more complete information and is more educated in most cases does not coincide.
          1. +14
            25 November 2020 12: 46
            Quote: Ros 56
            You should know that the present is never great due to the many points of view and political views due to the lack of complete information.

            Your opinion is not an axiom, but a personal point of view. In the USSR, many people considered their period of life to be great, because the country reached really great heights in a short period of time, and the lack of complete information was not an obstacle for them to feel this greatness.
            1. -1
              25 November 2020 13: 21
              Seriously, you ask those who survived the period of the civil war, repressions in 37 years and later. Today we can assert something, and even then not completely. Well, this is a bunch
              in general, you are quartered for such words.
              1. +4
                25 November 2020 13: 32
                Quote: Ros 56
                Seriously, you ask those who survived the period of the civil war, repressions in 37 years and later. Today we can assert something, and even then not completely. Well, this is a bunch
                in general, you are quartered for such words.

                To clarify, I meant the period, approximately, from 1955 to 1980, and I know well the opinion of people born in this period - they remember it with great love.
                And as far as those that you brought in the picture, I do not care and their opinion does not interest me, as, incidentally, I suspect theirs is mine. In our fatherland there has always been a category of people who have eternally blamed the historical past, the existing present and project future of our Motherland, such leeches on its body, all of whose conversations are reduced to negative, but I’m not on my way with them.
      4. +11
        25 November 2020 14: 38
        Quote: Hunter 2
        will and a great future.

        Will be? For 1% of people in Russia, this great future has already come. Especially for those who are close to Vladimir Vladimirovich!

        To the rest, Dmitry Anatolyevich gave a faithful covenant for the future - there is no money, but you are holding on.
      5. +1
        25 November 2020 15: 52
        Russia had a great past (with completely different incomes) - there will be a great future. Do not doubt!

        Truly so.
        And experiences of what will happen next if the leader (Stalin, Brezhnev, Putin, etc., etc.) leaves in the history of Russia and, probably, will continue to be.
        Always, when a strong long-term leader leaves, I would like to see a decent change.
        Few were worried, but what will happen after Yeltsin? It was not up to that.
    2. +2
      25 November 2020 12: 22
      Quote: x.andvlad
      Give people legitimate good money, and therefore increasing your material wealth - there will be a future after 2024. After all, the thieves do not allow this. This is the system. And if you keep people in a strict collar - there is no future.

      ===
      not an option, prices will jump. can better and more correctly limit prices by reducing costs, reducing non-productive costs, order, discipline, compliance with laws.
      1. -3
        25 November 2020 21: 01
        Have you ever thought about healthy competition? Everything would only be limited and prohibited ...
        1. 0
          26 November 2020 09: 26
          Quote: Antidote
          Have you ever thought about healthy competition? Everything would only be limited and prohibited ...

          ===
          yes, yes, I heard and see. first raise \ overestimate, impose costs, and then "reduce" in the name of "healthy competition"
    3. +13
      25 November 2020 12: 29
      The problem is that the system is tailored for one person and a narrow circle of people. Now there will be a latent squabble over the shrinking feed base (hello, the decline in export volumes and oil prices). This will determine the future of the country.
      1. +9
        25 November 2020 12: 49
        Is such a system generally viable? In the long term?
        Let's analyze the paragraph:
        “It never occurs to anyone to predict the development of the United States before the end of the presidential term of the same Donald Trump or Joe Biden.
        Is this normal?
        Is it normal that the future and very existence of a country depends on the life expectancy and state of health of a single inhabitant?
        Ie Volodin's message "no Putin - no Rossii" should be taken literally?
        1. +13
          25 November 2020 17: 41
          Quote: Cosm22
          Ie Volodin's message "no Putin - no Rossii" should be taken literally?

          So they do not see the meaning of life without Putin, and not because they will not allow robbery, but because there is a hypothetical danger of responsibility for what they have done. And for the sake of 100% of the profits, the bourgeois will sell both mother and homeland. Aren't they like that in the EP?
      2. 0
        25 November 2020 17: 39
        The problem is that the system is tailored for one person and a narrow circle of people.

        A big problem for democracy and continuity of power.
        What about China? There is a similar situation.
    4. -18
      25 November 2020 14: 43
      Vladimir Vladimirovich is our President until 2036, and all speculations on this matter are inappropriate.
      1. 0
        25 November 2020 18: 17
        We have already seen grandfathers at the head of state. Do you remember how it all ended?
        1. -2
          25 November 2020 21: 04
          Quote: Deniska999
          We have already seen grandfathers at the head of state. Do you remember how it all ended?

          Tell this to the new American president and those who voted for him ...
          1. -1
            26 November 2020 11: 52
            Tell this to the new American president and those who voted for him ...

            In our political systems, presidents are very different. In their system, the president is a high-ranking and influential official, but his powers are limited and tightly regulated. In ours - the king, solely ruling the country.
            1. +1
              26 November 2020 16: 36
              Quote: Mishka78
              In ours - the king, solely ruling the country.

              Does it personally oppress you?
              I personally do not care who our tsar is, and what he is called now, because this form of government has been traditional for Russia for many centuries. With what joy should I be guided by the American management system - can you reasonably argue, or just blah blah blah about "democracy"? I wonder where you saw her ...
    5. -6
      25 November 2020 18: 39
      Quote: x.andvlad
      Let people legally earn good money, and therefore increase their material wealth - there will be a future after 2024. After all, the thieves do not allow this. This is the system. And if you keep people in a strict collar - there is no future.

      This is an interesting thought ... To earn money on what? Now private workshops with CNC machines (I work with them) pay their machine operators from 100 sput. Low overhead. Moreover, guys without higher education, unite, rent premises, lease machines ... And they work. But - they are professionals, and they work - "until I drop" ... In reality, often for 12 hours ... And no president bothers them ...
    6. -3
      25 November 2020 19: 06
      For the sake of views on social networks, young people are already burning Mercy for 12 million, and someone is still stopping you from earning.
  2. -3
    25 November 2020 12: 01
    Well, Putin left tomorrow ... and if he does not leave the receiver, they will blame him ... if he leaves the receiver, they will blame it ...
    And suppose a representative from the Communist Party comes to power ... - what will be his actions? Where will the country turn?
    More active comrades !!!
    1. +14
      25 November 2020 12: 10
      From the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, only the name remained, plus or minus everything was mixed)))
      1. +6
        25 November 2020 16: 14
        Quote: loki565
        From the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, only the name remained, plus or minus everything was mixed)))

        And we have no other Communist Party (nothing better) for you.

        Or is it an excuse for you to drown for EdRo?
        1. -7
          25 November 2020 17: 59
          And if there is no difference, then why not?)))
          1. +5
            25 November 2020 18: 37
            Quote: loki565
            And if there is no difference, then why not?)))

            No, there is a difference. But, it doesn't matter to you. Because you in any case will drown for EdRo, and denigrate the Communist Party.
        2. 0
          25 November 2020 22: 10
          Quote: Stas157
          And we have no other Communist Party (nothing better) for you.

          Or is it an excuse for you to drown for EdRo?

          Who cares? In the name? laughing
    2. +9
      25 November 2020 12: 21
      Quote: Nasr
      Well, Putin left tomorrow ... and if he does not leave the receiver, they will blame him ... if he leaves the receiver, they will blame it ...

      He can only be blamed for the fact that the country has cleared the political field for choosing an alternative candidate, and there is only "succession".
      1. +4
        25 November 2020 19: 05
        Quote: WIKI
        the country has cleared the political field

        for this, it is enough to look at the Belarusian neighbor hotly supported by the Kremlin ... such a projection on our next elections
    3. +7
      25 November 2020 12: 38
      Quote: Nasr
      Well, Putin left tomorrow ... and if he does not leave the receiver, they will blame him ... if he leaves the receiver, they will blame it ...

      Putin cannot go anywhere. For any "successor" he will be a toxic asset on which it is easiest to blame all the troubles and problems. And no thousand laws on total immunity will help.
      True, you can repeat the trick of 2008 - to put in place of yourself a completely worthless little man. But now that won't work either. Another option is also possible - with the departure to the position of caudillo, to the head of the State Council. And the approval of the West by the sale of the last liquid assets
      Quote: Nasr
      And suppose a representative from the Communist Party comes to power ... - what will be his actions? Where will the country turn?

      In the current situation, it is a fantastic assumption. But as for the classics. A change of persons and even parties, while socio-economic relations remain unchanged, will not fundamentally change anything.
      1. 0
        25 November 2020 17: 09
        Have you read the law on the State Council adopted today? It says: the President of the Russian Federation is the Chairman of the State Council, the State Council is served by the staff of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation. A number of members of the State Council are ex officio, and a number are appointed by the President.
        1. +1
          26 November 2020 09: 41
          Quote: Sergej1972
          Have you read the law on the State Council adopted today?

          No, I haven't had time yet. Thanks for the clarification. So this option, which is true after the launch of "zeroing" and so it was unlikely, was finally removed from the agenda.
    4. -7
      25 November 2020 12: 41
      Comrades differ little from gentlemen. Whites will come to rob, the reds will come robbing again, one devil is white .... red ... green ... one world is smeared.
    5. -2
      25 November 2020 13: 05
      And if a representative of Fair Russia comes to power? They are, according to Mironov, for socialism. Where will the country turn? More active comrade !!!
    6. +3
      25 November 2020 13: 54
      Quote: Nasr
      Well, Putin left tomorrow ... and if he does not leave the receiver, they will blame him ... if he leaves the receiver, they will blame it ...
      And suppose a representative from the Communist Party comes to power ... - what will be his actions? Where will the country turn?
      More active comrades !!!

      By the way, about the representative of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, I immediately remembered the young head of Khakassia, whom in Khakassia only the lazy does not remember with a "kind" word.
      Or let's remember Nikita Belykh from the notorious liberals. And there are also "heroes" from United Russia, who also showed themselves not in the best way in high positions.
      So it turns out that without control from the bottom, any candidate from any party can break such firewood that we will then take them apart for decades and rebuild our house. You don't have to go far to find an example - Gorbachev and Yeltsin from the CPSU are "bright personalities" of the late CPSU era.
    7. +5
      25 November 2020 16: 18
      Quote: Nasr
      suppose a representative from the Communist Party comes to power ... - what will be his actions?

      To begin with, dismiss the government and the publican and reconsider the predatory privatization.
    8. +5
      25 November 2020 17: 42
      Quote: Nasr
      suppose a representative from the Communist Party comes to power

      Will not come
      Quote: Nasr
      Where will the country turn?

      History shows that after carrying the body forward with feet, the country rolls into the abyss
  3. 0
    25 November 2020 12: 03
    It is not rewarding to calculate such options.
    Who had heard of GDP before its introduction? And who could have imagined that he would become supreme?
  4. +5
    25 November 2020 12: 03
    Again "the end of history". How can? My head hurts.
    1. +7
      25 November 2020 12: 23
      Quote: iouris
      My head hurts.

    2. 0
      25 November 2020 14: 12
      Again "the end of history".
      "In the most interesting place!" (C)
  5. +1
    25 November 2020 12: 07
    Vladimir Putin should have left for this period. Of course, leaving the post to a reliable person is better than a woman. This is a knight's move. So I would have remained progressive and loved by all. And so from love to hate .......
    1. +16
      25 November 2020 12: 16
      it's not about Putin. "the king, the retinue is playing" - that is, the oligarchy, "friends" and co-operative associates. that's all. Putin will leave, but another "Putin" will come, the system cannot be rebuilt just like that, and this is sad.
      1. +7
        25 November 2020 12: 21
        Here I am about the same. A system has formed in the country, which, unfortunately, is not always on the side of an ordinary person. This means that not everyone will associate themselves with the country. This is especially true for young people.
      2. -1
        25 November 2020 17: 09
        Quote: Aerodrome
        it's not about Putin. "the king, the retinue is playing" - that is, the oligarchy, "friends" and co-operative associates. that's all. Putin will leave, but another "Putin" will come, the system cannot be rebuilt just like that, and this is sad.

        Who is the "king" with this "retinue" and who is the "jester" is not obvious. Putin himself emphasized that he is only performing "representative functions." The author and many VO experts simply got carried away with the personification of power - it's easier this way. But what kind of "entourage" is this that conducts "optimization", forgives debts to all countries, plays the fool with the pension "reform", favors migrants and emigrants ... I do not know anyone who would vote for this or "choose". Therefore, what difference does it make to whom the “gray cardinals” will put: at least any “Prigozhin”, at least - Alla Pugacheva. This will not change politics.
        1. +6
          25 November 2020 17: 46
          Quote: samarin1969
          This will not change politics.

          Politics may not change, but life will definitely change for the worse. You can't endlessly rape the country
          1. 0
            25 November 2020 20: 01
            Quote: Silvestr
            Quote: samarin1969
            This will not change politics.

            Politics may not change, but life will definitely change for the worse. You can't endlessly rape the country

            Hmmm. And I still considered myself the most "armored pessimist" of the site ... I have nothing to argue with you or soften your words. hi recourse
    2. +11
      25 November 2020 12: 18
      Tereshkov had to be left.
      1. +4
        25 November 2020 13: 20
        Quote: 7,62x54
        Tereshkov had to be left.

        cool banter! good
      2. +6
        25 November 2020 13: 58
        in space. would leave a good memory of myself
        1. +5
          25 November 2020 14: 04
          Nobody knew in 63rd year what this madam would do in almost 60 years. And now you will not start it, it will crumble along the way.
    3. 0
      25 November 2020 12: 24
      Quote: Kamarada
      Of course, leaving the post to a reliable person

      You, as I understand it, exclude yourself and other citizens from this process?
      1. +5
        25 November 2020 12: 42
        Of course, leaving the post to a reliable person
        You, as I understand it, exclude yourself and other citizens from this process?

  6. +11
    25 November 2020 12: 10
    If Putin will be ballated for the next term, he will have to compete with a candidate against everyone.
    1. -1
      25 November 2020 12: 16
      Quote: evgen1221
      he will have to compete with a candidate - against all

      Again with a "worthless horse"? smile
      1. +6
        25 November 2020 13: 02
        Well, ksyushad go and not trample, although this time she has a chance to compare with GDP in votes.
        1. +3
          25 November 2020 14: 57
          Quote: evgen1221
          Well, ksyushad, go and not trample

          Do you think she just went at will? They will invite - so it will fly at full speed.

          Our king really likes to look like an eagle against the background of worthless personalities.
          1. -1
            25 November 2020 17: 48
            Quote: Stas157
            Do you think she just went at will?

            This is Kiriyenko's project. He wanted to know the percentage of support for a female individual in the country in case the daughter of one figure is nominated
            1. 0
              25 November 2020 18: 40
              But I fully admit this option! hi
    2. -2
      25 November 2020 12: 17
      Quote: evgen1221
      If Putin will be ballated for the next term, he will have to compete with a candidate against everyone.

      There is no such item for a long time. Suggesting to cross out ballots?
      1. +3
        25 November 2020 13: 00
        Yes, let's see, but this is not excluded, as well as a piece of paper in your pocket and in the nearest trash can as a variant of our answer to Chamberlain.))
  7. +2
    25 November 2020 12: 18
    It never occurs to anyone to predict the development of the United States until the end of the presidential term of the same Donald Trump or Joe Biden.
    In the United States, the development of the country does not depend on Trump, and even less on Biden. It has always been different in Russia.
    1. -5
      25 November 2020 12: 50
      Quote: tihonmarine
      ] In the United States, the development of the country does not depend on Trump, and even less on Biden. ...

      This is due to the fact that the president in the United States is the head that turns the neck, that is. elite ... Whichever president comes, he will always fulfill the will of this elite ... The elite in the United States is not replaceable ... Trump promised to withdraw troops from Afghanistan ... hehe, no matter how he did it ... Yes, the same black man as president - it's a clown, for idiots ... and before him, Bush Jr. - aka d-y-p-and-a !! , well, not anything .... The same Biden is an old man who has survived from his mind, his health is only up to the toilet .. -but he will be prompted what to do, or rather to say (he doesn’t do that) .. And remember grandmother Clinton is not prokanal, it became too obvious that an unhealthy person was being put on the presidency ...
      1. +4
        25 November 2020 14: 28
        Quote: Nasr
        The elite in the United States is not replaceable ...

        Whoever has the Fed rules.
  8. +6
    25 November 2020 12: 22
    A candidate who cancels loans and mortgages for individuals. persons will win the elections.
    1. +10
      25 November 2020 12: 32
      Quote: 7,62x54
      A candidate who cancels loans and mortgages for individuals. persons will win the elections.

      And it will cancel raising the retirement age. Yes
      1. +7
        25 November 2020 12: 45
        A candidate who cancels loans and mortgages for individuals. persons will win the elections.
        And it will cancel raising the retirement age.

        Maybe he can, but who will give him ...
    2. +5
      25 November 2020 13: 00
      With such slogans and will win. But on the fact of their implementation, the question is ... within 6 years, he will come up with so many excuses that would not be fulfilled ... The progressive tax has been discussed for 30 years, as if like a committee on the abolition of serfdom, under Nicholas I smile
      1. +8
        25 November 2020 13: 12
        Nothing wrong. Dear Leader for 20 years has promised so much, and so many excuses were, or simply ignored, as if he did not say anything, that the hunt is already looking for something new, maybe that will change.
        1. +4
          25 November 2020 13: 39
          maybe that will change.

          "Balda says:" I will serve you gloriously,
          Diligently and very regularly,
          In a year for three clicks on your forehead,
          Give me some boiled spelled. "
          The pop wondered
          He began to scratch his forehead.
          Clicking a crack is rosy.
          Yes, he hoped for Russian maybe.
          ............................................................
          Poor pop
          Framed forehead:
          From the first click
          Pop jumped to the ceiling;
          From the second click
          Lost pop language
          And from the third click
          The old man's mind was knocked out.
          And Balda condemned with reproach:
          "Wouldn't you be chasing, pop, for cheapness" "(c) smile
    3. 0
      25 November 2020 17: 11
      I will be against it. Why did I fulfill all my obligations on loans and mortgages on time and in good faith, and for someone they write off all their debts?
    4. +2
      25 November 2020 17: 50
      Quote: 7,62x54
      which cancels debts on loans and mortgages for individuals. persons will win the elections.

      Quote: Bongo
      And it will cancel raising the retirement age.

      The election program of the GDP.
      The taxes are already sold. What can't you do for your beloved
  9. -2
    25 November 2020 12: 25
    Meanwhile, any predictions in modern Russia are made only until 2024. And this is very scary.

    Do you, excuse me, want to discuss some document? Or blog posts?
    Energy strategy (there is such a document), for example, until 2035. request
  10. -7
    25 November 2020 12: 25
    The authorities must have a security official, or a military man who is supported and respected by the army. It is admitted that he is known within his district, but the main thing is that he is an inactive and responsible person, not afraid to make decisions for them himself and be responsible. And, most importantly, it is to save the country from two troubles - a civil war, and outside interference. Also, the Constitution of Russia should finally be respected and implemented, as well as laws in general! There should not be in Russia “our own”, “absolutely our own”, and “completely exclusively our own”! The authorities should work for the people, and not for their own feed, so the death penalty will have to be temporarily abolished. ..
    1. +4
      25 November 2020 12: 33
      The military do not know how to rule the country, they are only suitable for war or for tightening belts on the stomach.
    2. +2
      25 November 2020 12: 45
      I think if VVP decides to leave, it will not sit until 2024 - 2022-3 leaves .. why? so that the left IO has time to show itself and "conquer" the electorate before the elections .. does someone think that he will not leave a successor? it is clear that not one of those who are now shown on TV .. well .. the presidential elections in March, i.e. leaving, for example, in May, another 10 months for the "image": it is significant to disperse / punish someone, what thread to cancel, what social payment to assign, maybe there are a couple of nuclear submarines under construction now, etc. and the new President is ready .. I don’t think that the “alien” system will let through ..
    3. +5
      25 November 2020 17: 52
      Quote: Thrifty
      the authorities must be a security official, or a military man who is supported and respected by the army

      Are you going to fight or develop the economy?
      And then, do not care about the opinion of the rest of the population?
  11. +12
    25 November 2020 12: 27
    Most of the former Soviet republics, after the abandonment of Socialism and the subsequent collapse of the USSR, underwent a similar transformation: a post-Soviet state with life at the expense of Soviet assets - eating them away - weakening - selling political independence as one of the key assets - a typical state countries 3 cap. of the world.
    Some of them deviate from this scheme (for example, the Baltic ones have passed the post-Soviet phase), but the essence is the following. The Russian Federation has been in the post-Soviet phase for the longest time, simply because there are many more assets that can be used to live on. But now they are coming to an end. These are personnel, education and industry and health care and housing and communal services, and military equipment, etc. With the weakening of the Russian Federation, it is quite logical that external pressure increases - the authorities of the Russian Federation, withdrawing all assets from the country, were fine with everyone.
    But for the time being, it is more logical to pump everything out of here without laying in the face of local Gauleiters.
    So the Russian Federation is on the verge of a systemic transformation, a group personally oriented towards Putin, of course, fiercely opposes this, because if they lose power, they will also lose their looted property. Hence the hysterical syndrome of the "besieged fortress" and cries of stability at any cost. On the other hand, with a decrease in the plundered pie, the internal mafia war increases, which we see literally here and now. players-globalists Biden, China and the EU.
    But looking at the current state of the control system (which is especially evident in this "coronavirus" year), I think not for long.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +5
    25 November 2020 12: 28
    And most likely he will go for a new term. If nothing happens. Not for the same, after all, they changed the Constitution,
    The adoption of the law on increased guarantees for the ex-president suggests the opposite thoughts.
  14. +3
    25 November 2020 12: 28
    All this is guesswork .. Time will tell .. But it was not in vain that VVP descended on the bathyscaphe .. But they knocked from the bottom ...
  15. -18
    25 November 2020 12: 29
    Putin will be after 2024. So everything is fine.
    1. +2
      25 November 2020 12: 45
      Putin lived, Putin is alive, Putin will live forever. Vladimir Vladimirovich turns bronze without realizing it. A sure sign of contradiction, time is inexorable even to such patriarchs of politics as him.
  16. +10
    25 November 2020 12: 30
    If Putin goes to 2024, then most likely the event of Belarus should be expected. There are more and more young people, and they are very anti-Putin.
    1. -8
      25 November 2020 12: 59
      young people will quickly adjust their brains
    2. +4
      25 November 2020 13: 11
      we have different situations with Belarusians. I have never been a supporter of Lukashenko, but I should give him his due, in his country there is no such social gap between the strata of society, the people themselves are mostly mono-national, society is not intimidated by external threats and imaginary internal ones. Luka has very clumsy methods - forceful suppression, this does not work anymore. Compare with us: a social abyss, a person who has achieved something a little bit immediately thinks that others work little, kleptocracy at all levels, constant interfaith tensions that will only intensify, society is struck by the virus of fear, for his life, for the future of children, for the fact that "NATO countries are at the gates", because "the great virus will kill us all." This model of impact on society has already been tested in America and is well applied there, we are trying to build something like that, not without success, I want to note. In such conditions, the Belarusian scenario is not possible in Russian realities.
      1. +1
        25 November 2020 14: 49
        In such conditions, the Belarusian scenario is not possible in Russian realities.
        Lukashenka has somewhere to run and where to wait for help, in Russia it will be much tougher, and then a curfew and many other perversions, and a massacre at the end of the rule of this "elite", of course, not of their own free will.
  17. +5
    25 November 2020 12: 38
    There will be no Putin, the system will remain, it was not built so that after Putin left, it would collapse ... No one is going to change it, neither the systemic opposition, nor the non-systemic ones ..
  18. +3
    25 November 2020 12: 45
    My prediction is a military dictatorship. Someone like Rokhlin or Makashov. Perhaps even with elements of nationalism. I’m wondering how the president of Chechnya will behave with his countless battalions and guards after the Putin era? What will he do? The third Chechen war is inevitable, coupled with the war with Japan, this will be the catalyst for the revolution. Unfortunately, there will be no communists in power, the divided people are not ready for the class struggle.
  19. +1
    25 November 2020 12: 52
    Most likely, there will be no changes, now in Russia the system is governed by the same Putin. With or without him, the system is formed and does not let in the extra, how many years are the same people in politics. Even the opposition resembles a farce, on the stage of a prison.
  20. +6
    25 November 2020 12: 54
    If in Russia the people would live in abundance, well, it’s possible to fantasize, the people were completely purple, who is there and how much is already in power.
  21. +1
    25 November 2020 13: 43
    Yes, it looks like everyone is terrified if Putin leaves. All are thieves, bandits, officials, nerus ... The fantastic time of lawlessness in the state may end ...
  22. +2
    25 November 2020 14: 00
    I think that a person like Putin will live to be 100
  23. +1
    25 November 2020 14: 02
    If you want to make God laugh, tell him about your future! Psychologists have already proven from their experiments that telling others about your plans makes them less workable.
  24. +1
    25 November 2020 14: 13
    Author:
    P P 'SЊSЏ RџRѕR "RѕRЅSЃRєRёR№
    while Vladimir Vladimirovich is clearly determined to continue his presidential career.

    How can the author confirm such a profound conclusion? If we compare what Putin said in the XNUMXs about his two terms and how many years he has been in power, then the author's forecast looks at least ridiculous. And even before the age of Biden, our president is still oh, how far away, and the words of the author somehow sound unconvincing ...
    1. +12
      25 November 2020 16: 25
      On November 17, 2020, Senator Klishas and deputies of the State Duma from United Russia Krasheninnikov and Savastyanova submitted a bill to parliament allowing Russian President Vladimir Putin to run twice more for the presidency.
      The bill was prepared in pursuance of the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, adopted as a result of the all-Russian vote.
  25. +7
    25 November 2020 14: 34
    The current government will not nominate anyone sensible from its midst. They are simply not there. The more less visible people, this camarilla ruins in the bud. Nepotism is everywhere, and as a result, mutual responsibility, hence the permissiveness of the authorities. Not a single ethnic conflict in the North Caucasus has been resolved, what will happen to Chechnya, which is now being paid tribute when Putin leaves. How will Kadyrov behave? Is there confidence in loyalty to Russia with the departure of the president? There is no such confidence. And the Ossetian-Ingush conflict? It has not been resolved either. And how will Tatarstan, Bashkortostan and other subjects of the Federation behave? There are no clear answers to all these questions. Everything will depend on who will take the throne, so to speak. If the personality of the type, V.I. LENIN, I.V. STALIN, PETER, then Russia will live, talkers and idle talkers, such as Kerensky, Gorbachev, then everything, Russia is a big cross. Those who began to flicker back in the days of Yeltsin, such as Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky, etc., cannot be taken into account, they are already tired. Let's hope for Russia, there have always been personalities in it. Even in my youth, I read, 20 years later, Dumas, I remember one phrase from the novel, let me quote it ... “Yes, but, fortunately, we don't have Oliver Cromwell in France,” the queen objected.
    - Who knows, - said Gondi, - such people are like lightning: you will know about them when they strike ........ Give Russia a PERSONALITY!
    1. +17
      25 November 2020 16: 22
      Quote: Unknown
      Give Russia PERSONALITY!

      How can a Personality appear if
      Quote: Unknown
      Nepotism is everywhere, and as a result, mutual responsibility

      It turns out that you first need to defeat nepotism and mutual responsibility before a new Leader appears.
      1. +2
        26 November 2020 07: 48
        So we have come to the conclusion that the current system of power has outlived its usefulness. We need other people, a different power.
    2. +2
      25 November 2020 20: 58
      Quote: Unknown
      .And how will Tatarstan behave,

      And in Tataria, they still do not decide anything without Shaimiev. The same will happen in Russia, where the "honorary senator" Putin with someone else's hands can keep obstinate abreks at the causal place for a long time.
      Quote: Unknown
      The current government will not nominate anyone sensible from its midst. They are simply not there. The more less visible people, this camarilla ruins in the bud.

      An absolutely unfounded conclusion, if only because Putin himself was little known in the country before his appointment. By the way, just the current government is very united by the sanctions of the West, which put them in front of a vybolrom - either they keep consolidated, and hide their capital in Russia, or they will be robbed like a sticky one, like the same Berezovsky, Pugachev and many other Russian oligarchs who hoped that the west has right and freedom.
      So I doubt that your forecast will be confirmed at the next elections, which will most likely be won by Putin again.
      Quote: Unknown
      Give Russia PERSONALITY!

      Offer yourself - maybe you will flash like lightning on Internet resources ...
      1. +1
        26 November 2020 08: 27
        Quote: ccsr
        And in Tataria, they still do not decide anything without Shaimiev. The same will happen in Russia, where the "honorary senator" Putin with someone else's hands can keep obstinate abreks at the causal place for a long time.
        ...... Do not confuse the Tatar mentality with our Russian one. With them, may Shaimiev leave to rule, we never! We are different, at our best, to retire personal, like Khrushchev, Gorbachev and Yeltsin, and immediately forget that such was, at worst, to the sounds of a funeral march, feet first from the Kremlin, from old age and diseases accompanying it.
        Quote: ccsr
        An absolutely unfounded conclusion, if only because Putin himself was little known in the country before his appointment. By the way, the current government is very united by the sanctions of the West, which put them in front of a choice
        ............. Putin was known in St. Petersburg and the region, and in Moscow the Kremlin elite knew him, so whoever needs it knew everything about him. It only seems to you about the power and its cohesion , should Putin stagger, but the West will wave a candy in front of its nose, in the form of lifting sanctions to individuals, and they will hand over the guarantor outright, it was and will be ..........
        Quote: ccsr
        Offer yourself - perhaps you will flash like lightning on Internet resources ..
        Your sarcasm is understandable, but I will not offer myself as a face, did not come out, such things do not shine.
  26. +9
    25 November 2020 14: 40
    Colleagues, you and I a year and a half ago gave him the opportunity to sit until 36 without any problems.
    Well, why should he give it up?
    I do not exclude that he may and would be glad to retire, live in peace, raise children, etc., but who will give him that? All those his Sechins, Millers, Grefs, Roldugins and other Volodins with Matviens? They will not let him go anywhere, they are afraid. Yes, and he himself think it's scary .. What if they ask them? After all, so much has been stolen ... The number of billionaires is growing, the number of billions among billionaires is also growing, and the quality of life, food, education and everything else among the average man in the street decreases every year.
    I communicate with young people, they have 2 main branches of development now.
    1 - for the civil service, so that you can steal.
    2 - get out of the country, because they see no prospects here.
    There are exceptions, but this is generally true.

    Real transformations in 20 years at least. How oil and gas were pumped, how round timber and other raw materials were exported, and we are exporting. In general, space has been profiled almost completely .. Yes, weapons and nuclear technologies have not yet been lost, but the example of space is straining ...
    Ballet is our everything.
    1. +17
      25 November 2020 16: 20
      Quote: Mishka78
      Ballet is our everything.

      And even in the field of ballet, Russia has lost its world leadership.
      Boris Eifman said ten years ago:
      There are no new choreographers. There are three choreography departments in St. Petersburg, but over the past 20 years I have not noticed the appearance of at least one new talented choreographer. Graduates of our academy often come to me who hate ballet. Mom or grandmother once forced them to study, they suffered for eight years, and now they have neither the desire to devote themselves to the profession, nor a sufficient level of general education. Most of the graduates do not go to ballet at all, some go to other professions, others to variety shows or sports. Because of this, there are no new ideas for the development of ballet art itself, which leads to a decrease in the level of professionalism of Russian ballet as a whole.
  27. -8
    25 November 2020 15: 58
    Whoever wants to work, earn and live well - he does, the rest complain to the computer about Putin and dream of leaving Russia (as if they are waiting for you there somewhere and promise to smear it with honey). And we will be fine.
  28. -10
    25 November 2020 17: 31
    The article contains at least three deliberately false messages that cast a shadow on the author.
    1.
    Vladimir Vladimirovich is positioned by domestic pro-government media as "our everything", to which there is no alternative and cannot be

    It's a lie. The truth is that no alternative has emerged over the years, although the authorities themselves and Putin personally are actively fertilizing the soil to grow it. But, by analogy with the biblical lamentation about the quality of the elite of the chosen people, at the end we have Navalny and similar "wild berries". And what the courtiers say about Putin is not interesting, since they have a different agenda - to sit and sit.
    Digression.
    It never occurs to anyone to predict the development of the United States until the end of the presidential term of the same Donald Trump or Joe Biden.
    Now no one knows how it will end, because they started a real struggle for power, and not the circus that has been since the time after Roosevelt. In Russia, power is always real. Those who are at the top have the power. And it is right.
    2.
    Is Putin going to act "Yeltsin-style" at the very last moment - to take out "from the casket" a new, hitherto little-known personality and declare her his successor? Unclear.
    It’s just clear. Exactly. Putin always acts like this. He never waves his fists before a fight, he waits and then hits with a knockout blow. Why should we tell you who is the successor? For the Americans to hunt him? It’s expensive to train an heir. The tsars spent at least 20 years on this. So everything is clear to you, you just don't like it. So write down why you (or I) should decide who Putin chooses.
    3.
    Vladimir Vladimirovich is clearly determined to continue his presidential career.
    We don’t know this, we don’t need Lala. And even more so about the period after that.
    Not for the same, in the end, did they change the Constitution, so as not to take advantage of the general motive of its transformation?
    Lying. This amendment is not important at all. For the strategic development of Russia, at least three are important: the role of the Russian people, the mention of God and the priority of Russian laws over international ones. And zeroing is rather a provocation of the idiot servants, incited by the liberals. But is Putin dying of shame? He will not be hindered by the opportunity to take power back if the liberals decide to seize it following the example of Biden.
  29. +3
    25 November 2020 17: 55
    Quote: Odyssey
    I think not for long.

    Very sane comment hi
    And then some shriek without getting to the hospital with covid and after waiting for the doctor 3-5 days from 38 ° C
  30. 0
    25 November 2020 18: 30
    Quote: orionvitt
    Dissatisfaction with everything (about 10% of the population), this is an integral part of any

    When the Bolsheviks came, the peasants accounted for about 90% of the population. I think most of them were not happy with the "knitting" of collective farms, dispossession, surplus appropriation, driving cattle into common herds, etc.
    The "reasons" were fought with deportation, bullets and poisonous gases. recourse
  31. +3
    25 November 2020 18: 34
    And what are the sadder scenarios ??? This is when the stolen (or their descendants, they already have) dispossessed or what? Personally, I have already looked after several houses and individuals for dispossession of kulaks))) Anyway, if Th then some time of "timelessness" will I be in trend? no? Joke (almost)
  32. +1
    25 November 2020 19: 40
    In reality, not everything depends on the Romanovs, Dzhugashvili, Putin, etc. Everyone has to obey (CONSCIOUSLY OR NOT) the laws of the universe.
    Russia not only can, but must be big and strong. This will only make the whole world better.
    WHOSE OF THE RULERS OF RUSSIA DOESN'T CONTRACT THIS, THE PEOPLE REMEMBER AND SUCCESSFUL IN THE GOVERNMENT.
    This is not a whim of the Russians, these are the requirements of the Unified Primordial Laws - the balance must be observed!
    This is clearly seen from the analysis of the "Core and Periphery Concept".
    The fact is that any process, and human development is a PROCESS, always has a CORE and a PERIPHERAL.
    The periphery is freer and more reckless. Its role is to find, at any cost, everything new, without any regard for the consequences of such actions.
    The kernel is more conservative and judicious. Its role is to select, preserve, and transmit to others the necessary (but safe) locations of the Periphery.
    At the moment, the West (and Poland gravitating towards it) is the periphery of this Process. And Russia is the NUCLEUS. This natural opposition of the Spiritual Core and the Intellectual Periphery of the human population is perceived by people (due to a lack of real Knowledge) as hostility. The roles of the Core and Periphery in the world, not only do not exclude, but naturally complement each other.
    Whether we like it or not, the role of Russia (as the core of the process) in world history is rigidly set. It is foolish not to reckon with this - "God. Earth. Man" (in particular, part I, chapter X and part II, chapter VIII)
  33. +2
    25 November 2020 20: 57
    “It never occurs to anyone to predict the development of the United States before the end of the presidential term of the same Donald Trump or Joe Biden.
    Absolutely correct thesis.
    Do not confuse the south coast of the north sea with the north coast of the south.
    It's even strange, after all the experiments done with the country, to report this ...
    This is the specificity! As one friend of mine says.
    Hence, the comparison with a certain West and their world order, I think, is not correct.
    It doesn't fit here. From the word at all.
    "So, in the event of any unexpected consequences of Putin's departure" from the presidency, changes in the life of the country can be so significant that now no one undertakes to seriously develop any strategies for the development of the state for the period after 2024. "
    This is unfortunate.
    And where does this information come from?
    Has the author - the president informed that the strategy is not being developed? recourse
  34. 0
    25 November 2020 21: 08
    It never occurs to anyone to predict the development of the United States until the end of the presidential term of the same Donald Trump or Joe Biden.

    how the mattress is ruled not by presidents, but by clans
  35. +2
    25 November 2020 23: 14
    “... no one of the official representatives of the authorities ever speaks seriously about Russia without Putin. And this is one of the Kremlin's biggest mistakes. ”
    This is not the Kremlin's fault, since The Kremlin wanted so much to rule - to be a dictator. The entire vertical is subordinate to the Kremlin, the State Duma and Verkhnyaya Sud - to the Kremlin, the exclusion of competitors - the Kremlin's fault, etc.
    And then call this system a “mistake”? C'mon, man !!!
    Russia has always aspired and wanted to have dictators - a tsar, the CPSU, Putin. People are not accustomed to thinking / choosing for themselves. Therefore, Russia will remain for another 50 years in the feudal system in Asia.
  36. +3
    25 November 2020 23: 47
    In general, this question is interesting and important, because Putin can get ready even for the presidency, even for the monks, but people sometimes die suddenly and the older they are, the higher this probability ...
  37. 0
    26 November 2020 05: 39
    I read the comments and ... the desire to get involved disappeared. Let the "prosecutor's office" be wearing glasses under the article "people's discontent with Putin, expressed on the Internet."
  38. -1
    26 November 2020 05: 48
    GDP is necessary to rule for life! then there will be stability!
    1. -1
      26 November 2020 05: 52
      GDP is necessary to rule for life! then there will be stability!
      Yes, yes ... let's immediately erect a monument to him during his lifetime like the Yeltsin Center and we will worship him as a deity.
  39. 0
    28 November 2020 20: 01
    I read the comments and catch myself thinking - for the overwhelming majority, the current "leader" is such a weak character that everyone is worried about only one question - who is the receiver.
    But no one wants to ask himself the question - which is more important, the person at the head of the state or the state itself.
    The state is not in terms of the presence of its main features - the army, power, special services, administrative apparatus, etc., but in a broader sense of the word - the territory and the people inhabiting it. As well as the history of these peoples (we are a multinational association).
    And most importantly - those goals, in the broadest sense of the word, uniting us all together.
    And if we consider the essence of our existence from these cornerstone positions, then a very gloomy, apocalyptic picture emerges.
    The following always comes to my mind.
    Our country is a gigantic territory, with great potential, but ruled by pygmies who accidentally managed to get to the helm.
    But the level of intelligence, the level of responsibility for what is entrusted to them, they do not correspond to the scale of tasks and problems that exist.
    The one who sits behind the red wall, in my understanding, is a crisis manager.
    Nor is it the most successful one.
    Having at the beginning of his path a rather serious capital of the population's trust, he systematically and thoughtlessly lost it.
    A crisis manager is someone who can quickly and intuitively make the only right decisions in the face of time pressure.
    It's like a surgeon deciding to take a limb in order to save life.
    But in the future, the crisis manager is obliged to leave, creating conditions for planned and progressive development.
    But an "ordinary miracle" happens - we, Russia, plunge from one crisis into the next.
    And it's not worth pointing out that there are enemies around us and are just waiting for our mistakes.
    For this, there is such a thing as mind and intellect.
    And also a normal human reaction is anger.
    Do you want everyone to stop pecking at you?
    Break the sniffer of the offender, in front of his friends. Break it so that you can't get up from the ground for half an hour.
    And invite anyone to repeat the lesson.
    But we have been, are and will be in the state of a punching bag only because the constructed model of the economy implies the sale of national wealth to those who will then be consumed by us.
    Subservience to Western "partners" has led our country to total dependence on any whim of any madman.
    So it is not in the personality of who should and can come to power.
    And in the very paradigm of relations - the state and the person, the state and the people.
    But no matter how Russia and the rest of the world.
    Until such a change occurs, Russia will stagger at the tail of "civilization".
    And no newcomer who called himself the "successor" of the current head of state will be able to start turning this ship, which is called Russia, in the right direction.
  40. 0
    30 November 2020 14: 00
    Quote: WIKI
    cleared the political field, for selection

    Here in this there is a strangeness, because there is no special need for this, they clean up not because they are "against", but simply because they are not in the "lake".

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"