Tragic pages in the history of Cyprus: "Bloody Christmas" and Operation Attila

106
Tragic pages in the history of Cyprus: "Bloody Christmas" and Operation Attila

Today we will talk about the tragic events on the island of Cyprus in 1963-1974, which frightened the leaders of socialist Bulgaria very much and pushed them to carry out the notorious "Renaissance Process" campaign in this country.

The Island of Cyprus: A Brief History from 1571 to 1963


The geopolitical position of Cyprus is unique. The distance from it to the coast of Turkey is only 70 km, to Syria - a little more than 100 km, to Lebanon - a little more than 150 km, Israel is about 300 km from this island, to Egypt about 400 km, to Greece - 950 km. There are few islands in the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea, all the more so large: the size of Cyprus is such that it makes it possible to create a good separate state here.


Not surprisingly, Cyprus has attracted the special attention of all the superpowers that have ever existed in the Mediterranean and even beyond. And the British, having recognized Cyprus as independent, never left it, leaving behind two large military bases - Akrotiri and Dhekelia, occupying 3% of the island's territory.



This island belonged to Turkey since 1571, when it was captured from Venice under Sultan Selim II. Since then, a large Muslim diaspora has emerged there, consisting not only of ethnic Turks, but also of Greeks, Genoese and Venetians who converted to Islam. Since 1878, after the conclusion of the Cyprus Convention (a secret Anglo-Turkish treaty on a "defensive alliance" directed against Russia), the British, who formally belonged to Turkey, were completely ruled by the British, who annexed it after the outbreak of World War I, already in 1914. In 1923 Cyprus officially became part of the British Empire.

After the end of World War II, the ideas of Enosis (the movement of the Greeks for reunification with historical homeland). In Greece, the ideas of the annexation of Cyprus were treated more than favorably. In March 1953, at a secret meeting in Athens, where Cyprus was represented by Archbishop Makarios III, the country's top leaders approved a plan to fight the British, which included not only peaceful protests and diplomatic pressure, but also the methods of guerrilla warfare. Colonel Georgios Grivas, who fought with the Bulgarians in World War I, with the Turks in the Greco-Turkish 1919-1922, with the Italians during World War II, was to be responsible for the military operations. The British from the Special Operations Directorate, with whom he collaborated as the leader of one of the underground groups in occupied Greece, gave him the following description:

He is hardy, hardworking, humble and thrifty. He is not afraid of danger, because he is sure that he will have the strength and ingenuity to cope with them. He is shrewd, suspicious and alert.


Colonel Georgios Grivas

And Cyprus broke out: numerous rallies, actions of disobedience and attacks on the British and their supporters led to the fact that on November 24, 1954, a state of emergency was declared on the island. The retaliatory repression, which the Greek press was constantly writing about, greatly damaged the international image of the British. Their fight against demonstrators and insurgents is now more and more often compared with the actions of the fascists Mussolini and the Nazis of Hitler, at the suggestion of the Greeks, and in some newspapers, the British governor Harding was called the Gauleiter of Cyprus. Somehow coping with the anti-colonial movement of Cypriots on the island itself, the British were clearly losing the information war outside its borders.

In the end, the British decided that two large military bases on this island would be enough for them, and in 1960 agreed to grant independence to Cyprus. But it turned out that the victory did not bring Cyprus any closer to reunification with Greece, because the Muslims living on the island categorically did not want this. While the British ruled the island, Christians and Muslims somehow found a common language on the basis of universal hatred of the "colonialists and occupiers." Now representatives of different confessions have the opportunity to pay more attention to their neighbors who are of different faiths, who, moreover, have completely different views on the future of Cyprus. The Greeks dreamed of Enosis, most of the Turkish Cypriots supported the idea of ​​Taksim - dividing the island into two parts: Greek and Turkish.

By that time, the proportions of the island's population were as follows: Orthodox Greeks - 80%, Muslim Turks - 18%, people of other confessions and nationalities - 2% (among them were Lebanese Maronites, Armenians, British settled here).

Ethnic map of Cyprus 1955. Here you can also see the British military bases of Akrotiri and Dhekelia:


The first president of Cyprus was Archbishop Makarios III, the vice-president was Fazil Kucuk, who back in 1944 created the Cyprus National Party of the Turkish People.

Archbishop Macarius, First President of the Republic of Cyprus, and Vice President Fazil Kucuk:


"Bloody Christmas" 1963


The first major outbreak of violence on the island of Cyprus occurred in December 1963. Mass attacks by the Greeks on the Turks in Nicosia, Larnaca and 104 villages were later called "Bloody Christmas".

In the early morning of December 21, 1963, Greek police stopped a taxi in Nicosia with Turks returning from guests and tried to search the women in the car. Muslim men obstructed them, a fight broke out, and the police used weapon... Hearing the sounds of gunfire, people began to run out of the surrounding houses, and soon the situation finally got out of control.

This ridiculous incident was the beginning of a bloody conflict that engulfed Nicosia, Larnaca and 104 villages. On the afternoon of December 21, groups of armed Greeks drove around Nicosia in cars, shooting at all the Turks indiscriminately. The Turks fired back, taking up positions on the rooftops and at the windows of houses, as well as on the roof of the Saray Hotel and on the minarets. Riots soon swept across Cyprus and Muslims were attacked in their homes throughout the island. In a few days, 364 Turkish Cypriots and 174 Greeks were killed. A great international resonance was caused by the message about the attack by the Greeks on one of the hospitals in Nicosia, in which more than 20 patients of Turkish origin were allegedly shot. The Greeks issued a denial, claiming that only two patients of this hospital were then shot by a "lone psychopath" and one more died of a heart attack during these events. Which of the parties in this case should be believed is impossible to say now.

The number of Muslim refugees was enormous: in Greece it is believed that there were 9 thousand of them, the Turks say 25 thousand. Some Christians were also forced to flee - about 1200 Armenians and 500 Greeks. Many abandoned houses (both Christian and Muslim) were plundered, some of them were burned (to exclude the possibility of the return of the owners). According to official UN data, voiced in the report of the Secretary General of this organization on September 10, 1964, the number of looted houses was 2000, destroyed and burned - 527.

On December 30, 1963, Greece, Great Britain and Turkey signed an agreement on the division of Nicosia into Turkish and Greek enclaves, and in 1964 UN peacekeepers were introduced to Cyprus.


Canadian peacekeepers on the island of Cyprus, 1964

The events of December 1963 are still celebrated by Turkish Cypriots as “the week of memory and martyrdom of 1963-1974”. And in the school textbooks of the Greek Cypriots, these events are called "Turkish rebellion" and "a period of aggression by Turkey and Turkish Cypriots against the Greeks."

In 2004, the President of the Greek part of Cyprus, Thassos Papadopoulos, even stated that from 1963 to 1974. not a single Turkish Cypriot was killed. These words have been called a lie even in Greece and South Cyprus.

The bloody standoff in Cyprus in 1974


With the arrival of the peacekeepers, interethnic and interfaith problems on the island of Cyprus have not disappeared at all. In addition, the Greeks themselves were divided, the radical part of whom was no longer satisfied with the "compromising" position of the President-Archbishop Makarios, who was now accused of making concessions to the Muslims.


Areas of Cyprus inhabited by Turks in 1974

The nationalist group EOKA, created in the mid-1950s as anti-British, was now ready to shed blood (both their own and that of others) in the name of Enosis's ideas. The leader of this organization, Georgios Grivas, already familiar to us, enjoyed the support of the “black colonels” in the Greek government, and after his death in January 1974, EOKA completely came under the control of the Metropolitan special services and Dimitris Ioannidis, one of the leaders of the Junta.

On July 15, 1974, a coup d'etat was organized by the radicals, in which the National Guard of Cyprus and units of the Greek army took an active part. The Cyprus News Agency informed everyone about the events of that day:

In the morning, the National Guard intervened to stop the fratricidal war between the Greeks.

The main goal of the coup was declared to be "restoring order in the country." It was also announced that the President of Cyprus Makarios was dead, but in fact he flew to London.


Greek Cypriot with AK-47, July 18, 1974

The ousted and declared dead President Makarios was replaced by Nikos Georgiadis, better known by his journalist pseudonym "Sampson". This employee of The Cyprus Times and an active member of EOKA began with the murders of British and collaborators, photographs of whose corpses he later posted on the pages of his publication. On this occasion, he joked: they say, I always find myself "the first reporter at the scene." It was thanks to his activities that Ledra Street in the old town of Nicosia was named the Death Mile.


Fighter against British imperialism Nikos Georgiadis (Sampson)

The same Grivas recalled:

There have been so many murders in the center of the capital that London newspapers have called the site "death mile." Most of this truly daring work was done by a squad led by Nikos Sampson. They were responsible for over 20 murders.

Nikos was twice sentenced to death, but pardoned after the 1959 Zurich-London Agreement, the first step towards Cyprus' independence. Returning to his homeland in 1960, he began to publish the newspaper "Mahi" ("Struggle"), at that time he met with the leader of Algeria Ahmed bin Bella and US President John F. Kennedy.

He took an active part in the events of Bloody Christmas in 1963, and in 1967 went into opposition to President Makarios.


Nikos Sampson, 1964

But he had nothing to do with the 1974 coup, and even Ioannidis was surprised by his candidacy.


Nikos Sampson and his supporters with the captured Turkish flag, 1974

The President of Cyprus Nikos was destined to be only 8 days, but let's not get ahead of ourselves, because on the calendar we still have July 15, 1974, and Turkish warships and landing ships have not yet left the harbor of Mersin.

Operation Attila


The participation of the Greek army in the coup d'état in Cyprus opened the way there for the Turkish troops. As a justification for their military mission, the Turks presented a 1960 treaty, according to which Turkey was one of the guarantors of the independence of Cyprus. The Turkish government said that the objectives of the operation are to preserve the sovereignty of Cyprus, which is encroaching on Greece (the Greeks had nothing to offer such a trump card) and to maintain peace on the island. And for this, of course, it is necessary to provide assistance to the Turkish population of Cyprus and prevent its destruction - everyone remembered December 1963 very well, and neither the local Turks nor Ankara had confidence in the Greek Cypriots. However, in Greece, as you remember, there were completely different assessments of the events where the Turks acted as aggressors and rebels. And the armies of the two countries, each of which was a NATO member, now had to engage in battle on the long-suffering island.


Combat and landing Turkish ships leave the harbor of the city of Mersin, July 19, 1974


Turkish Tanks on board a transport ship

The military operation of the Turkish army, during which the Greek fleet was defeated and the Greek landing troops that landed on the island were defeated, received the code name "Attila".


Operation "Attila" on the map

But in Turkey this formidable name is not in honor now: here they now prefer to call it more boring and dry - "Operation to maintain peace in Cyprus".

Turkish ships approached Cyprus on July 20, 1974, on that day 10 thousand soldiers and officers landed on Pantemili beach (in total, up to 40 thousand Turkish servicemen took part in Attila operation).


July 20, 1974: Turkish landing on Pentemili beach begins

The most epic battle of this war was the battle of 28 Turkish aircraft with three destroyers - also Turkish (!), Which took place on July 21. Turkish planes were sent to intercept Greek ships going to Cyprus from Rhodes. But they changed course, and in a given area were Turkish destroyers, carrying out fire support for the landing near Kyrenia. And here the descendants of the Hellenes were not at a loss: openly on the radio they thanked the crews of "the Greek ships that arrived in time." True, Turkish flags were raised on the "Greek ships" for some reason, but everything could be expected from these cunning and dishonest Greeks. The Turkish pilots happily attacked their ships, drowning one of them and seriously damaging the other two. On the ground near Kyrenia at that time there was a pilot of a previously shot down Turkish plane. Seeing how his comrades attack their own ships, he contacted them and reported that a terrible mistake had occurred. He was asked about the code word of the day and, when he named yesterday (the new was unknown to him), he was praised for his good knowledge of the Turkish language.

In general, the level of chaos in the brave Turkish troops was then no less than in the brave Greek army.

On July 22, the Turks lost one fighter in an air battle, but captured the Nicosia airport: in this battle, they exchanged five M47 Patton II tanks for several armored personnel carriers and two HS-121 passenger aircraft, which brazenly stood on the runway.

The next day, an armistice was concluded, which did not prevent the Greeks from burning two Turkish tanks, and the Turks from destroying three enemy artillery positions.


Turkish tanks M47 "Patton II", Cyprus, 1974

Despite the declared ceasefire, the Greek patriots amused themselves by hunting the Turks: from August 1 to August 6, 5 tanks and two armored personnel carriers were knocked out of ambushes using ATGMs.

On August 14, the second stage of hostilities began. 80 Turkish tanks M47 "Patton II" moved to Famagusta, with which Cypriot T-34-85 tanks entered the battle, which, by the way, showed themselves very well in those battles with superior enemy forces.


Greek tanks T-34-85, Cyprus, 1974 (32 Soviet tanks were purchased by Cyprus in 1964 and delivered in 1965 via Egypt)


Turkish tanks M47 "Patton II" in their original positions, August 14, 1974


Greek soldiers next to a captured M47 Patton II tank

Despite the heroism shown by the Greeks in certain sectors of the front, by August 18, the Turks controlled 37% of the territory of Cyprus, but were forced to stop under UN pressure.

Greek soldiers in Cyprus, August 1974:


Turkish Cypriots greet their compatriots from the Metropolis, August 1974:


Turkish soldiers victorious:



Loss data reported by different authors (especially Greek and Turkish) vary greatly. The following figures seem to be the most reliable: during the fighting on the island, the losses of Turkish soldiers amounted to 498 people, the Turkish Cypriots lost 70 soldiers and 270 civilians killed by the Greek military during the retreat. The losses of Greece turned out to be an order of magnitude greater - about 4 soldiers and officers. According to various estimates, from 000 to 1974 thousand Greeks fled to the south of the island in 140, and from 200 to 42 thousand Muslims to the north.


Turkish woman who received news of the murder of her husband by the Greeks, Cyprus, July 20, 1974


Jean Mohr. Greek children in a refugee camp, Cyprus, 1974

This catastrophe led to the fall of the government of the "black colonels" in Greece, the leaders of the junta - Papadopoulos, Ioannidis, Makarezos and Pattakos, were arrested and sentenced to life imprisonment. In the north of Cyprus, the unrecognized UN-Cypriot Turkish federal state was created (since November 15, 1983 - the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus).

Most strikingly, the Greek Court of Appeal, upon the conclusion of the war crimes case against the "black colonels" on March 21, 1979, issued a judgment (no. 2558/79) justifying Turkey's intervention:

According to the Zurich and London agreements, Turkish military intervention in Cyprus is legal. Turkey is one of the guarantor states that have the right to fulfill their obligations. The main criminals are the Greek officers who prepared and carried out the coup, thus preparing the conditions for this intervention.

In 2001, a Cyprus v. Turkey lawsuit was filed with the European Court of Human Rights. The decision in this case was made only on May 12, 2014: Turkey was ordered to pay 30 million euros in compensation for moral damage to the relatives of the missing people and 60 million euros in compensation for moral damage suffered by the Greek Cypriots living on the Karpas Peninsula. The Turkish authorities gave an example of how to treat the decisions of this strange judicial body that offend national dignity and limiting sovereignty: they calmly declared that its decisions were not binding.

In the next article we will talk about the impression made by the described events on the leadership of socialist Bulgaria, the "Cyprus Syndrome" by Todor Zhivkov, the infamous "Renaissance Process" campaign and the "Great Excursion" of the Bulgarian Turks.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

106 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    23 November 2020 05: 53
    Interethnic and interreligious strife, this thing is stronger than Goethe's Faust ...
  2. +6
    23 November 2020 06: 30
    Greek Cypriots are still maniacs, it turns out ... just scumbags ..
    1. +8
      23 November 2020 12: 45
      This is their land, they have lived there for 3000 years, and no one invited the Turks there.
      How many peoples live from which the Turks have been drinking blood for 500 years, and the same number of peoples have already been wiped out from the face of the earth.
      1. -5
        23 November 2020 13: 23
        the standard excuse for any local nationalism after the massacre of civilians.
        the truth does not work against the army
        1. +10
          23 November 2020 14: 47
          Why excuse? The Greeks have actually lived in Cyprus since the bearded times of Agamemnon, Hercules and Theseus. The Turks came there with war only in the second half of the 16th century, conquered the island, tried to colonize and Islamize it. Greeks, essno, resisted uninvited aliens
  3. +8
    23 November 2020 06: 48
    I would like to put the caption under the first illustration: "Grandma, take away your goats, now tanks will pass here!" (C)
    Thank you, Valery!
    1. VLR
      +7
      23 November 2020 08: 29
      I would like to put the caption under the first illustration: "Grandma, take your goats away, now tanks will pass here!"

      Pay attention: Turkish tankmen "salute" the old woman grazing sheep. That is, this is probably a propaganda photograph that should illustrate the idyllic relationship between Turkish Cypriots and their "liberators".
  4. +24
    23 November 2020 07: 23
    Great article. Closed another blank spot in the knowledge of history. But the final map of the division of the island is missing.
    1. +21
      23 November 2020 10: 15
      Quote: bairat
      But the final map of the division of the island is missing.

  5. VLR
    +17
    23 November 2020 07: 37
    By the way, the opposition to London Archbishop Makarios, the future president of Cyprus, was arrested by the British and sent into exile - to the Seychelles. I recall the words of the general from Filatov's fairy tale, that he is ready to "serve", "but preferably in July, and preferably in the Crimea."
    1. +13
      23 November 2020 07: 45
      Seychelles.
      This is now a pretentious resort, but then it was a hole in a hole.
    2. +6
      23 November 2020 08: 09
      By the way, now, when arriving in South Cyprus, tourists are asked: Would you like to visit North Cyprus? And if a person with a stupid mind says -Yes! They put you in jail for 2-3 days, and then deportation and a lifelong ban on entry!
      1. +10
        23 November 2020 08: 34
        By the way, now, when arriving in South Cyprus, tourists are asked: Would you like to visit North Cyprus?

        What nonsense? Nobody asks anyone upon arrival. And then you can go anywhere, to North Cyprus too.
        1. +5
          23 November 2020 08: 57
          The girl was detained at the Larnaca airport, and then deported due to the fact that she was paid for a hotel room in Northern Cyprus
          Source: kommersant.ru/amp/3786273
          A few days earlier, a number of media outlets reported on cases of detention and deportation of Russian citizens from the airports of Larnaca and Paphos. Russian citizens sent home tried to enter the island through checkpoints in the south of the island, but planned to live in the northern (Turkish) part of it. Thus, it can be assumed that the reason for the detention and deportation of Russian tourists was the intention to go to the territory of Northern Cyprus immediately after entering through checkpoints at airports in the south of the island.
          On the same day, the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry M. V. Zakharova gave an interview to the radio station Business FM and explained the position of the foreign ministry regarding the situation with the detention of Russian citizens in Cyprus.
          Additional recommendations for Russians planning to visit not only the southern, but also the northern part of the island are published in the mobile application of the Russian Foreign Ministry “Foreign Assistant” and on the agency's website in the corresponding regional section “Cyprus”.
          1. +7
            23 November 2020 09: 11
            Many tourists, including Russian citizens, who arrive at Larnaca airport, end up behind bars and then are deported. It happens, if foreigners report that they intend to visit the northern territories of Cyprus.

            The story of a resident of St. Petersburg Irina Shirobokova was actively discussed on social networks. The Russian woman said that mass arrests are taking place at the Larnaca airport in Cyprus. She also had to endure the arrest while going through border control, despite a two-year Schengen visa and a paid hotel room. Business portal BFM.ru informs about it.

            The hotel where Shirobokova made a reservation is located in Northern Cyprus, that is, on the territory of the unrecognized republic occupied by Turkey. As it turned out, you can visit this territory, but reporting this at the airport is highly discouraged. As Irina said, after the tourist announces his plans for a vacation in North Cyprus, he is arrested at passport control, and instead of the long-awaited rest, he is sent to a prison cell.
            Source: https://versia.ru/pribyvayushhix-na-kipr-turistov-iz-rossii-otpravlyayut-v-tyurmu-pryamo-iz-ayeroporta
            1. +2
              23 November 2020 14: 26
              The Russian woman said that at the Larnaca airport in Cyprus there are massive detentions.

              I can imagine that theoretically there can be isolated cases, but massive ones are pure delirium. Cyprus is not rich enough to discourage the flow of tourists. And isolated cases - the initiative of some local officials, possibly at the suggestion of the Turks, and for a round sum to reduce the flow of tourists to the Greek part of Cyprus. So nonsense, despite the link provided.
              1. +3
                23 November 2020 15: 53
                Quote: Aviator_
                So nonsense, despite the link provided.

                "On the same day, the official representative of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs M. V. Zakharova gave an interview to the radio station Business FM and explained the position of the Foreign Ministry on the situation with the detention of Russian citizens in Cyprus."
                I have no personal representation in Cyprus, and I am not Zakharova's assistant either. I use publicly available information.
            2. +3
              24 November 2020 01: 11
              Quote: kalibr
              The story of a resident of St. Petersburg Irina Shirobokova was actively discussed on social networks.

              I don't know what Irina Shirobokova is talking about; was in Cyprus several times (for work). Nobody asked provocative questions and did not tulle in jail. From the first (incognito) person - write it down. Do not exaggerate!
      2. +13
        23 November 2020 10: 48
        It is not true, last year in September I was in Cyprus (Greek part), they offered trips to the Turkish part, with a visit to the capital.
        Although everything is possible, there are provocations, there may have been isolated cases to discourage fans of such trips.
        And the article is good, informative.
        I remember that these events were covered in the Soviet press, but somehow neutral, and the Turks are enemies, and black colonels too. Although I was not particularly interested in politics then, the girls were in my head, oh youth
        ... )))))
        1. +1
          23 November 2020 10: 50
          Quote: Blacksmith 55
          Not true

          Information with links to the source and Zakharova's speech before you.
          1. +7
            23 November 2020 10: 58
            I wrote that there may have been cases, but this is not a system, you can freely do Tours to northern Cyprus, by bus with a guide.
            1. +3
              23 November 2020 10: 59
              Quote: Blacksmith 55
              You can freely do Tours to Northern Cyprus, by bus with a guide.

              Yes, I also drove without problems ... But as you can see, someone also has problems.
        2. +3
          23 November 2020 20: 38
          Blacksmith, +; about a similar situation, at the age of 14 girls are more interested in all at once and preferably without clothes
      3. +9
        23 November 2020 15: 32
        Quote: kalibr
        By the way, now, when arriving in South Cyprus, tourists are asked: Would you like to visit North Cyprus? And if a person with a stupid mind says -Yes! They put you in jail for 2-3 days, and then deportation and a lifelong ban on entry!

        Hello, Vyacheslav Olegovich! hi
        Between the flights Tel Aviv - Larnaca, Larnaca-Krasnodar I had 7 hours to go through customs. At passport control they ask:
        - Why are you leaving?
        - I want to see the country a little
        - Drive to Larnaca waterfront
        - Is it possible to hit the road to Northern Cyprus?
        - Can. But only through Turkey hi
        1. +2
          23 November 2020 18: 25
          Albert! hi
          Before the trip to Eilat I read that in Israel, too, "the skis are wrapped"
          1. +9
            23 November 2020 22: 21
            Greetings Anton! hi
            In Israel, problems at passport control are created by:
            a) Natives of Georgia;
            2) Russian-speaking attractive girls under 35;
            3) Citizens of Ukraine.
            They can simply be folded back. Visiting Iran and Arab countries (visas, stamps) can raise a few questions - no more.
            1. +3
              23 November 2020 22: 27
              For citizens of Ukraine
              Exactly. Why such rejection of Ukrainian citizens?
              1. +5
                23 November 2020 23: 47
                After the Maidan, many were in a hurry to get refugee status and a residence permit because of the “threat to life” in connection with being “Russian-speaking”. While this is being considered (it may take years), the person is allowed to stay in Israel and work. This was used by becoming migrant workers, i.e. stupidly went to Israel to work. At the end of 2017, the Israelis were allowed to stay only to people from the LPNR - directly the combat zone. But they still try to use the loophole.
        2. +5
          23 November 2020 19: 55
          Good evening to you too. When I was there, our Russian tour operator offered an excursion there for 56 euros. I went to Ay-Anapa and found a Bulgarian travel agency, where I bought it for 26 euros. The guide was Russian and all the tourists were Russian. By the way, in the photo with the castle of Hilarion (there is one on the Web, the girl is walking along a path fenced with railings), on the right, you can see the shooting range of the Turkish special forces, and further on the left is its base. And no one checked anything with us, although the guide asked to remove the fotiki when crossing the border.
          1. +5
            23 November 2020 22: 23
            We will know, thanks! hi
  6. +6
    23 November 2020 07: 56
    I thank the author for the interesting story. It's nice, you know, in the morning to read something of a kind, recent, almost modern.
    Moreover, I had previously read about this confrontation only in the context of the actions of the Air Force.
  7. +10
    23 November 2020 08: 05
    Our dear Valery wrote an excellent article! I was in Cyprus, it seems, in 2014, I went to the North Side, I was near the closed city of Famagusta, I watched and photographed monuments to heroes and generals ... But I never wrote my material. And now I have no regrets. Valery has everything in great detail and in detail. The only thing I can say: both the Greeks, everyone remembers this, and the Turks. And on the Turkish side, armored personnel carriers (BTRs) 113 are standing right in the streets, soldiers are walking around with weapons and taking pictures is prohibited!
    1. +8
      23 November 2020 11: 11
      And I was in 2012, they wanted to go by car to an ancient temple near Varosha. I drove up to the Cypriot soldiers, they were digging trenches on the outskirts of Deryneia, asked about the road, they showed, well, I drove along a country road, seemingly along a neutral strip with UN flags and barbed wire, but after 300 meters I buried myself in a sign with the inscription "Mines ", did not risk it, turned around and drove back. "Thanks" to the black colonels, the Greek Cypriots lost Famagusta and the best resort of Varosha. and so the presence of Britain is felt there, an antenna field at Cape El Greco, a communications base east of Protaras, a large locator in the Troodos mountains, this is in addition to the English territories, which are written about in the article. Akrotiri remained as the main military base and the Dhekelia region between Ay Napa and Larnaca.
  8. +8
    23 November 2020 08: 51
    I remembered ...
    On the island of Rhodes, having seen the radar, asked the Greek for a guide
    "Military"
    The answer was short
    "Yes, Turkey is near."
  9. +3
    23 November 2020 09: 07
    Here, all sides are good, both the Greeks and the Turks ... They love to cut each other, friend ... You don't need to go far, from the 18th to the 20th century, enough for each other, they let blood on each other ...
  10. +2
    23 November 2020 09: 33
    The Turks do not know how to fight, the operation is organized mediocre, etc. This is what some Russian leaders and military experts say. How did it happen that their losses were 8 times less than those of the Greeks, and this despite the fact that some of the Turks died from "friendly fire"?
    1. +5
      23 November 2020 10: 15
      The article simply did not provide a decoding of the Greek losses. 4000 are wounded, killed, prisoners, both military personnel and civilians are counted. The Turks had about 3500. But the Turks were more stubborn and the battlefield remained with them. The Turkish army cannot be underestimated. But you shouldn't overestimate either.
  11. +10
    23 November 2020 10: 01
    The USSR helped the Cypriots. He directly supported the UN, transferred weapons through AKEL (Progressive Party of the Working People of Cyprus), allowed Czechoslovakia to sell weapons, etc.
    As an example: Illegal transfer of small arms to "Cypriot friends"). Note of the KGB to the Central Committee No. 1853-A


    For the Soviet Union, the 1974 Cyprus war was a real "gift". After all, it was not just NATO Turkey that attacked Cyprus, it was not just NATO Greece that tried to annex the island. There was a real war between Greece and Turkey, between NATO countries! Something that Moscow could only dream of.
    The Turkish invasion closed any opportunity for Cyprus to join NATO. After all, the power on the island could change and become anti-Soviet. And only the unsettledness of the Cyprus problem was a guarantee that Cyprus would not join the unfriendly union.

    In 1984, the UN Security Council formally condemned the creation of the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus". Both the USSR, Britain and the United States voted for this document. However, the matter did not go beyond words. The Western allies did not want to further inflame the conflict in their alliance, and it was unprofitable for the USSR to solve the Cyprus problem - after all, this is the bone of contention of the main enemy.

    In 2004, it became possible to hold a referendum on the island and close the Cyprus problem once and for all. But it was not there...
    The UN Security Council resolution, the draft of which was prepared by Britain, prescribed how the international community would behave if the referendum was successful in both parts of the island and Cyprus was reunited. It was planned that instead of the 1,4 thousand peacekeepers currently on the island, a UN special mission consisting of 2,5 thousand soldiers and more than 500 police officers would arrive there. In addition, Cyprus will be demilitarized, an arms embargo will be imposed there, and the world community will assume full responsibility for how the transition period of reunification will go.
    And this plan seems to be good for everyone - diplomats of all countries expressed their support, but presented it to the members of the Security Council only on Monday. On the same day, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan appealed to the Security Council members with a request to support the draft resolution. Both the British and Mr. Annan were in a great hurry to pass the resolution as soon as possible. Their haste is understandable: more than 65% of Greek Cypriots intend to vote against reunification, not wanting to take the eternal opponents of the Turks (who, on the contrary, intend to vote for unification) together with them into a common European bright future. Therefore, the UN resolution, its authors hoped, would be able to push the Cypriots in the right direction and save the long-suffering Cyprus settlement plan from failure.
    Having received the draft on Monday, the rest of the diplomats pointedly expressed their dissatisfaction with such a rush. Pakistan, Brazil, Chile, France, China, and Russia on Tuesday raised the question of whether there could be a rush to wait for Saturday's referendums. But Kofi Annan continued to insist on his own, explaining that if the Cypriots rejected the unification plan, then no resolution would be required.
    As a result, 14 members of the Security Council, including those who had previously expressed dissatisfaction, voted for, and only Russia is against. Since Russia is a permanent member of the UN Security Council, such a vote means a veto.

    The desire to annoy the Americans and the British turned out to be higher than the settlement of the conflict on the island and its demilitarization. hi
    1. +8
      23 November 2020 11: 01
      The explanation is too simple. Both Cypriots and Greeks did not approve of this plan.
    2. VLR
      +12
      23 November 2020 11: 17
      When southern Greek Cyprus joined the European Union, there was the thought of joining the whole island, which would serve as a unifying moment. A referendum was held in which two-thirds of the Turks voted in favor and two-thirds of the Greeks against. So the Greeks of Cyprus themselves do not want to unite.
  12. +4
    23 November 2020 10: 48
    there is never truth in conflicts based on nationalism ... in this particular case, of course, the position of the Turkish side looks much more correct ... and what could they do when the Greeks themselves rocked the situation and brought it to pogroms and murders ... with almost complete impunity ...
    1. +7
      23 November 2020 14: 52
      In the 16th century, the Turks, without asking permission from the local Orthodox Cypriots who lived on the island even when the Turks were grazing rams in Central Asia, invaded the island with weapons in their hands, captured it, incorporated into their empire, and when they did asked to go out (home, to Asia!) - raised a howl, they say, we, such white and fluffy, evil Christians oppress and oppress, wah-wai-wai
  13. +10
    23 November 2020 11: 08
    I can recommend Lawrence Darrell's book "Bitter Lemons" about the events of Enosis, which he witnessed.
    1. +2
      23 November 2020 18: 30
      Thank you Sergey! I know that the elder Darrell made his dream come true and became a famous writer, but his work passed me by. request
      1. +1
        23 November 2020 19: 29
        I know that the elder Darrell made his dream come true and became a famous writer, but his work passed me by.

        Good evening Anton, I also learned a few years ago that Lawrence "they have there" he is a much better-known writer than his well-known younger brother. In the USSR he was not published, I think for the reason that there is "a lot of sex" in his novels. Now it has been translated and can be found on the Internet, I found it, but I could not read a lot of it: you know this kind of literature - "abstruse", claiming to be highly intelligent, is difficult to read in my opinion. Although I have to try again, maybe this time it will go better. And I read "Bitter Lemons", it is something like an essay of an eyewitness of events, easy to read.
        1. +1
          23 November 2020 19: 49
          According to Gerald's memoirs, Larry was also a "writer for the elite"
          1. +1
            23 November 2020 20: 00
            Quote: 3x3zsave
            Larry was also a "writer for the elite"

            The Alexandria Quartet (a cycle of 4 novels) was a great success at one time, but I honestly could not beat. Here is "My family and other animals" - this is ours. laughing
            1. 0
              23 November 2020 20: 10
              Undoubtedly! Gerald, read-read. A rare gift for combining talents.
  14. +5
    23 November 2020 11: 33
    Moderators probably thump if they put Ryzhov and Shpakovsky together
    1. +5
      23 November 2020 11: 42
      Quote: vladcub
      Ryzhov and Shpakovsky together

      No, this is already a trend, though? wink
      Nothing human is alien and ... moderators. laughing
    2. +14
      23 November 2020 12: 18
      Quote: vladcub
      Moderators probably thump if they put Ryzhov and Shpakovsky together

      Otherwise, no one will read Samsonov.
      1. +4
        23 November 2020 18: 31
        I definitely won't. And you too.
        1. +1
          23 November 2020 18: 42
          Well, come on, kick me, with a heck!
          Boar, boom, bob! )))
          1. +1
            23 November 2020 19: 20
            What suddenly, Lyudmila Yakovlevna?!?!?!
          2. +2
            23 November 2020 20: 17
            Quote: depressant
            Well, come on, kick me

            Have you read Samsonov ?! Even commented, I suppose ?! Ah, you wretch! laughing wassat
            To be honest, we all sometimes sin with this ... So you can also ... smile
            1. +2
              23 November 2020 20: 55
              Only, you see, what is the matter ...
              Samsonov so, solidly, with pride: "We are Tartarians!"
              I, enthusiastically twisting: "Yes! Yes! I am a Tartarian!"
              What? Why not? Did the Ukrainians build pyramids? Descended from the Sumerians? Dug up the Black Sea?
              And how am I worse? )))
              Or have I messed up something, and it was not Samsonov?
              Then - oh, embarrassment)))
              1. +4
                23 November 2020 21: 05
                Samsonov - Scythian-Siberian-Rus.
                The Tartarians are to Bar. True, Samsonov is already trying to embed Tartary Fomenko (after all, just the first and last name! laughing ) into the system of the boreal world of Petukhov ... So far, not much progress, but we are waiting ... wassat
                1. 0
                  23 November 2020 21: 10
                  Yes!! We are Boreads! Zeta and Calaid! )))
                  I really like these guys in Botticelli's painting "The Birth of Venus")))
                  This is if I did not confuse it with the painting by the same author "Spring")))
                2. +1
                  24 November 2020 17: 54
                  How? You have not read about the third Tartarian-Siberian-Russian war
                  10 millennium BC? White walkers-tartars-rus ...
                  And you also consider yourself a cultured person. laughing
                  1. 0
                    24 November 2020 19: 08
                    Quote: voyaka uh
                    And you also consider yourself a cultured person.

                    I? God forbid. I am a village goon, with a purely worker-peasant roots, I spun these cultured city people on a stake with a pitchfork. So don’t rub me in about the Tartarians, I don’t perceive them with my primitive peasant brain. smile
          3. 0
            23 November 2020 20: 20
            Lyudmila Yakovlevna, you are not a moderator to beat you?
            A decent kid will NEVER hit girls, let alone kick them.
            I remember my childhood, we were not knights, but GIRLS WERE NOT AVAILABLE. They could push, pull the hair when they were in the 1st grade. In the 7th I was in the class "gray mouse", her classmates offended, and once they persuaded their gentlemen to beat her, but the boys only tore her dress.
            True, then there was "otvetka", the eighth-grader with brass knuckles "walked". We then learned what brass knuckles are. Now I remember that she treated herself rather gently: knuckle-duster things are serious. It was then called: "pig"
            1. 0
              23 November 2020 21: 05
              I repent! crying
              I beat the boys, beat ...
              You see, with all my peacefulness, fighting spirit ... I would say "you won't drink it up," but I don't. It was inherited from the Cossack and Polish ancestors on the maternal side. Now, diligently cultivating meekness in myself, I keep a set of weapons near my couch: a Chinese folding knife for 300 rubles, always open; further - a weighty hammer and a meat chopper)))
  15. +6
    23 November 2020 12: 19
    "The National Guard intervened to stop the fratricidal war" as I see it now: the "Time" program is on and Shatalova is reading a message from Cyprus.
    Valery brought me back to my childhood with his materials about "Operation'Atila". By God, I did not expect this.
    Valery, you managed to systematize everything without any bias. Don't be angry, but sometimes you are overly critical.
  16. +10
    23 November 2020 12: 49
    Greek Cypriot with AK-47, July 18, 1974

    Pictured is a Czechoslovak machine gun VZ-58!
    1. +6
      23 November 2020 13: 23
      Quote: pytar
      In the photo is the Czechoslovakian VZ-58 machine gun!

      With the permission of the USSR, Cypriots bought a lot of weapons from Czechoslovakia. So, nothing surprising.
      1. +7
        23 November 2020 13: 57
        With the permission of the USSR, Cypriots bought a lot of weapons from Czechoslovakia. So, nothing surprising.

        My note has a purely technical meaning - to correct typos "Greek Cypriot with AK-47"to" Greek Cypriot with VZ-58".
        1. +6
          23 November 2020 14: 30
          Boyan hi You noticed everything correctly, I would have done it myself, but you were the first. The devil is in the little things. smile
          1. +3
            23 November 2020 22: 39
            AK-47 and VZ-58 are similar in appearance and are often confused. Although their design is completely different. Czechoslovakia often sold arms to countries where the USSR abstained for political reasons. This cannot be called "deviation" from the general policy of the Social Bloc! There, everyone had their own tasks! hi
            1. +4
              23 November 2020 22: 50
              No, what kind of "evasion" is there, each did his own thing, but all together was a common cause. The Czechs and Cuba were the first to drive their weapons to Cuba, while the Union seemed to be keeping "polite". wink
              Here are Cuban girls with the Czechoslovak p / p vz. 48b chambered for 9x19. smile

              And here is the machine itself:
      2. +5
        23 November 2020 14: 35
        Come on, Alexander. smile Boyan noted everything correctly, for a small lie (inaccuracy) gives rise to a great distrust. And the Czechs drove their weapons around the world, earning currency for the "Comintern" laughing , and short barrels and the famous "Scorpions" under 9x19 and without any permission from the "Big Brother". hi
    2. +8
      23 November 2020 13: 53
      During the Cyprus events, the OVD closely watched the situation! All neighbors of Greece, under one form or another, offered to help the Greeks, despite the fact that they were in different political systems and military alliances. Bulgarian 3rd Army stationed in Vost. Thrace, opposite Turkey, was put on alert. The Yugoslav leadership entered into contacts with Atina and offered assistance. Military aid to Greece, even the Yary Stalinist Enver Hoxha from Albania suggested!
      1. +4
        23 November 2020 20: 52
        Boyan "putar", thanks for the information. It is very interesting that the OVD were ready to fight on the side of the Nazis. After all, in our country the then leaders of Greece were considered fascists
        1. +5
          23 November 2020 22: 35
          Indeed, before that, our socialist propaganda used the term "fascist reactionary junta" about the Greek colonels. No other way! But! During the Cyprus events, the tone of the propaganda changed dramatically. The ideological contradictions were "forgotten"! The position of Greece was given out positively, and Turkey was an aggressor, an age-old enemy. Archbishop Makarios was generally presented as a national hero of the Cypriot people, almost a socialist! It has hardly changed that it was overthrown by the Greeks themselves.
          It is clear that the split in NATO was at the hands of the Social Bloc, and in the Balkans there is only antipathies towards the Turks. This is an example of what if Erdogan makes a mess! Probably, it will catalyze such anti-Turkish sentiments that the Balkan Union is new, there will not be something unexpected!
          1. +2
            24 November 2020 12: 38
            You have eternal "sympathies" with the Turks. Actually, if you look at your story, you can understand "love" for the Turks.
            As for the "Balkan Union", there are some doubts: Serbs, Montenegro, Macedonians, yes. Albanians and Bosnians doubt it. In the case of a new: "Attila", you can "help" byaku do.
          2. +1
            24 November 2020 12: 47
            Boyan, I have a request for you: when Valery will talk about your events in 1984, so that you comment. Always wondering when the ts look from the inside
            1. +3
              25 November 2020 12: 07
              Good! good I was a direct participant at a relatively high hierarchical level in these events. Yes
              1. +1
                25 November 2020 12: 20
                Gorgeous. Direct participant in events. : "It was I who entered successfully." Perhaps you saw the comedy: "Ivan Vasilyevich is changing his profession"?
                Thank you in advance
  17. +8
    23 November 2020 12: 56
    The article is interesting, Valery, thank you. Interested in the battle of the Turks against the Turks. It seems to me that not only the Turks themselves are to blame for this farce, but also the Greeks took part quite actively. As far as I understand, Turkish destroyers and planes ended up at the same time in the same place in pursuit of a Greek landing ship, which, at the last moment, changed its course and "propelled the arrow" ... smile
    It seems to me that the point here, most likely, is not in the successful improvisation of the Greek radio operators, "grateful" for the help to the Turkish destroyers, but in the detailed and scrupulously developed plan of the Greek intelligence. too many coincidences - the Greek transport, the promised escort, the rendezvous point that became known to the Turks, the unexpected and unexplained change in the course of the Greek ships and their exit from the combat zone. At the same time, the number of Greek "escort ships" and their type corresponded to the number and type of the Turkish strike detachment ... No ... Still, this is "w-w-w-w" for a reason ... smile
    1. +8
      23 November 2020 14: 33
      In 2014, journalist Emin Chelashan managed to obtain information about the incident:

      1- At the officer of the operational center of that period (Staff officer Pilot Colonel Behchet Tamiroglu)

      https://www.sozcu.com.tr/2014/yazarlar/emin-colasan/kocatepe-batarken-genelkurmay-harekat-merkezi-560069/

      2- The pilot has one of the planes, Pilot Major Zeki Kilic, who participated in the attack,

      https://www.sozcu.com.tr/2014/yazarlar/emin-colasan/kocatepeyi-nasil-batirdik-pilot-anlatiyor-558491/

      3- From the Second Commander of the Adatepe Warship (a ship that managed to reach the Turkish coast) - Lieutenant Colonel Mehmet Kolburan, who was attacked.

      https://www.sozcu.com.tr/2014/yazarlar/emin-colasan/kocatepeyi-nasil-batirdik-denizci-anlatiyor-559423/

      The staff officer says that they received information that the Greek ships are heading for the island - it is not permissible, at any cost to attack and destroy them. To clarify the information, a radio reconnaissance aircraft of the Naval Forces took off. He returned and gave information - he saw ships, and there was a Turkish flag. Example Minister Bulend Ecevit was talking to Kissinger (US Foreign Office) at that time.

      https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/murat-bardakci-25-yildir-gizli-kalan-diyalog-39090573

      Example The minister told him: Greeks are cunning, they sail with our flag. And he answered - no one will be offended if you attack the ships that carry the Turkish flag.

      The pilots were given the task, they completed it, but after the attack, two ships could not be sunk. We returned to Mürted airbase. The headquarters received a notification that it could be attacked on its own ships (the pilots said that they saw Turkish flags on the ships). They asked the Navy - they answered their target ships. The pilots rejoiced and the planes took off again with new ammunition. At this time, Kocatepe was seriously injured, could not move, the remaining 2 ships (Adatepe and Marshal Chakmak) lost radio communications, one of them returned to Kocatepe and gathered sailors from the sea surface. The planes attacked again (three hours after the first attack). They finished off Kocatepe, but at this time they were told not to attack the ships anymore. It was not advisable to return with ammunition, the military port of Baf was bombed.

      There is also a "free-fire" in war. The Greeks also made a mistake with their targets and they also shot down one Greek transport plane, and three of them were badly damaged. 36 elite Greek special forces were killed in the attack.

      Turkey has won, and the sadness about the incident, about Kocatep and the dead is still fresh.
      1. +6
        23 November 2020 14: 55
        The confidence with which the Turkish pilots, despite the Turkish flags they identified, attacked their ships may also indirectly indicate that they had a clear intention to attack these ships, no matter what. Therefore, they had clear information that it was there and exactly at this time that the Greeks should be.
        Friendly fire is not uncommon for war. It is possible that all this happened as a result of banal carelessness and inconsistency of command. But it’s too painfully everything went well for the Greeks. It seems to me that there is some reason to suspect their direct participation in these events.
        1. +1
          23 November 2020 19: 37
          How do you imagine this: the Greek "Stirlitz" infiltrated the Turkish Air Force headquarters and planted pictures of Turkish landing ships?
          In this case, the "black colonels" must present him with some order.
          PS
          Let's go to you. We are close by age, by interests on the site too.
          1. +1
            23 November 2020 20: 50
            Quote: vladcub
            Let's go to you.

            No problem. smile
            As for Stirlitz - hardly, although everything can be. smile The destroyers of the Greeks and Turks were of the same type - according to NATO standards, they differed only in flags. And such a combination can be built without Stirlitz. For example: Greek intelligence records the entry into the sea of ​​a detachment of Turkish destroyers - its composition and course. The intended goal is to destroy the landing ship. The Greeks bring the same detachment to sea, through the channels controlled by the Turks, send a false message about the meeting and escorting of the landing ship by destroyers in such and such a composition to the place of disembarkation. All day long, everyone moves in accordance with these messages. The Turks bite and pull their destroyers to the landing site (the closest ones, just the ones recorded by the Greeks) and plan an air strike. At night, both the landing ship and the Greek destroyers change course and disappear in radio silence. In the morning the Turks arrive at the place - there is no one there. At dawn, Turkish planes leave for the indicated area and see a group of destroyers there, in the same composition as they were told. Plus, a prepared meeting with a message on the radio in plain text, they say, they are glad to see you (probably thought out by the Greeks in advance). So it turned out "do not believe your eyes." Everything is obvious in the eyes of the Turks. There is no time to sort it out. If you do not drop the bombs, disrupt the attack, they will be accused of cowardice. To make a decision - seconds ...
            I'm not saying that it was all necessary. But it could be so. To implement such a combination, it is quite enough to detect a detachment of Turks at sea and have a communication channel controlled by the Turks. Nothing supernatural.
            1. 0
              24 November 2020 12: 00
              In principle, it is not very difficult to do this. When I read with Valery about these events, I drew attention to the following detail: a downed Turkish pilot radiates to his own people and does not know the code word.
              There is a lot of turbidity. A pilot with a walkie-talkie landed, but there are no radios on the ships?
              Yesterday I wrote a comment and forgot this detail, but now I remember.
              Valery is not like a dreamer, but he used some dubious sources
              1. VLR
                0
                24 November 2020 12: 16
                There were attempts at radio communication - both from the ground and from ships, but the Turks did not believe. The pilot's address was already a gesture of despair and the last chance - suddenly one of the pilots recognizes his voice. The code word changed every day, and the pilot named the one that was yesterday, which convinced the Turks even more that they were being fooled: the Greeks learned the old password from somewhere, perhaps from the same captive pilot, but they do not know that he changes every day.
                1. 0
                  24 November 2020 13: 01
                  Good afternoon, agree that there is some kind of dregs. Suppose the pilots did not know the new password, this is understandable, but the ships could not communicate from the ground?
                  Yesterday I told you my opinion and I will repeat once again: the Turks are not bad fighters, but they are not "friendly" with coordination
  18. +6
    23 November 2020 12: 58
    In the 20th century, the Greeks are not lucky in the showdown with Turkey. In the beginning, they lost Smyrna in the war of 1919-1922, then out of the blue North Cyprus. And all because of the small-town nationalism towards the Turks. For centuries they lived there, quite peacefully, and everyone managed to profuse because of exorbitant ambitions.
    1. +3
      23 November 2020 14: 55
      Well, yes, the Orthodox in Asia Minor and Cyprus "peacefully and voluntarily" became part of the Muslim Ottoman Empire; Orthodox Greeks "peacefully and voluntarily" paid jizya and other taxes to the Muslim sultans ...
      1. +4
        23 November 2020 15: 46
        Quote: Sergey Oreshin
        Well, yes, the Orthodox in Asia Minor and Cyprus "peacefully and voluntarily" became part of the Muslim Ottoman Empire; Orthodox Greeks "peacefully and voluntarily" paid jizya and other taxes to the Muslim sultans ...

        But as soon as they got out of the power of the Muslims, they began to spill the local Turks not sour ... well, they got hit in the face ... in the end, the end is sad - they have already been trampled ...
  19. +5
    23 November 2020 14: 41
    Thank you, it was interesting to read.
    The victory was brilliant for those times. West pressed Turkey diplomatically ... Embargo, threats, sanctions ... despite all this, they resolutely went to war and won. The results were excellent - we went further than planned in the battlefields, after the armistice, we had to give up a little of the gained territory ..
  20. +3
    23 November 2020 15: 19
    Valery, I suspect that COVID has penetrated the moderators and they put you with Vyacheslav Olegovich. Does the virus affect the mind then? Or maybe a rat by its malignancy?
  21. +2
    23 November 2020 16: 35
    Cyprus is our large offshore zone, to hold a referendum there is business.
    1. +1
      23 November 2020 19: 11
      All my attempts to find out in which cities in Cyprus the offshore banks are located have failed. Why do I need it, I don't know, but for some reason interest arose - the main branch of heavy industry in this country!
      Finally, someone took pity. Like, why are you soaring? Branches of Cypriot offshore companies - in Moscow and St. Petersburg! Take documents (list attached), 30 euros, go and open an account. Hmm ... I wish I knew what 30 euros looks like.
      1. +3
        23 November 2020 19: 47
        Dear Lyudmila Yakovlevna! It is really easy to open a company in an offshore zone. There are special firms that deal with this. But you will receive an offshore bank account and a bundle of documents and that's it. We must be able to use this. There are different options. But this business, like everyone else, must be taken seriously. Here's a very elegant option: create an investment fund at 20% per annum. A one-time deposit of 1000 euros, drawn up by a notary. People believe and rejoice. You take this money as a legal entity. But you have an offshore company in the Cayman Islands, where the interest in the bank is 27%. You send money there as an individual! Your relatives too ... from different banks ... In a year you are on your own, again as a private person and at a minimum% you send this money. You honestly give 20% to the depositor, pay for gas, water, all taxes ... and take all this 7% - money out of thin air. Well, actually 5% from each trade. Everyone says about you how honest you are. Money flows like a river. And ... 5,5,5,5,5,5,55555555% from each transaction. Convenient, isn't it? But you write that you are bad with the Jews ... Reap!
        1. +1
          23 November 2020 20: 49
          They didn't understand the humor, I'm leaving.
      2. 0
        23 November 2020 21: 04
        Quote: depressant
        I would like to know what 30 euros looks like.

  22. +2
    23 November 2020 19: 06
    Quote: Stirbjorn
    began to spill the local Turks not sour

    The Turks were invaders there, whom the Greeks did not invite to their land
    1. -2
      23 November 2020 21: 24
      The Turks were invaders there, whom the Greeks did not invite to their land
      And Turkey has its own analogue on May 9 - the day of the country's liberation from the Greek invaders !!! So who is their occupier in the 500-year-old Greek-Turkish struggle - you can't figure it out without a bottle !!!
      1. +3
        23 November 2020 22: 02
        Here are just the first Greek settlements in Asia Minor appeared in the 11-10 centuries. BEFORE our era.
        And the nomadic Turks rode there only in the 11th century AD, when Asia Minor spoke Greek and professed Orthodoxy
        1. -3
          23 November 2020 23: 01
          And the nomadic Turks rode there only in the 11th century AD, when Asia Minor spoke Greek and professed Orthodoxy
          So what ? There are objective historical processes in the past that we can no longer change - and the United States emerged at the end of the 18th century and this completely childish age of the state does not in the least bother them from striving for world hegemony ...
  23. +3
    23 November 2020 19: 57
    Quote: smart fellow
    composition

    Generally, the Turks are not bad fighters, but their combination of actions is lousy. Remember, the last patch against Recep, there was a complete inconsistency of actions
  24. +3
    23 November 2020 21: 29
    The article could be read until the moment when the author says that as a result of the operation Atila, the Greek fleet and the Greek landing party were destroyed. a regiment of 1200 soldiers and officers based on the island on a permanent basis under a 1960 treaty. The Greek army was not there because in 1963 the 15th combined-arms division was withdrawn from the island, consisting of 15000sol. and officers and 250 M 48 tanks. The author could not hide of his philo-Turkish views on the events of those times, his information is unequivocally drawn from Turkish sources.
    1. +1
      23 November 2020 22: 46
      The truth arises, such a feeling ... There are some moments in that state and in the previous one that are alarming! For example, in the previous one, the author wrote a lot, but it was about the terrible atrocities committed by the Turks, as he missed it ... Bearing in mind that the Turks have committed monstrous crimes throughout their reign, and for centuries, it looks strange, mention them! Perhaps the author has not studied these topics deeply enough. Okay, let's not judge in advance! I'm waiting for the next article by the author, let's see in what vein "Revival Processes" will be presented.
  25. +1
    23 November 2020 21: 34
    In my opinion, the Cyprus crisis has shown in practice how important Turkey is for NATO !!! And the Turks themselves have always understood that for NATO the loss of Turkey is the loss of their entire southern flank. Therefore, Turkey can afford a lot - something that other members of the alliance cannot afford.
  26. +1
    23 November 2020 23: 23
    Quote: Selevc
    So what ?

    The fact that the invaders were exactly the Turks, who first conquered the Orthodox Greeks, imposed taxes on them, then staged a terrible massacre of Christians, and in the end ... Christians were also accused
  27. 0
    24 November 2020 12: 48
    Well done Greeks, they asked the invaders to overthrow. And the ships worked well.
  28. 0
    3 January 2021 08: 56
    One photo is incorrectly signed. "Greek Cypriot with AK-47, July 18, 1974". Czechoslovakian Sa vz. 58 and not AK.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"