New details of the OMT program: variants of the appearance of tanks

32

Models of modern armored vehicles at the OMT consultation in October

In early November, the US Army Ground Vehicle Systems Center (GVSC) revealed new details of the promising OMT (Optionally Manned Tank) program. In October, the Center held regular consultations with tankmen from the combat unit, and they evaluated the proposed concept projects of a promising tank... New details of various kinds have recently appeared in foreign media.

Concepts and models


Recall that the goal of the OMT program at the moment is to develop the appearance of a promising main tank that can be operational by the beginning of the thirties. The work is carried out by GVSC specialists with the involvement of various contractors and consultants in the person of US Army tankers.



In the wake of a recent military event, several interesting photographs have been posted. They included description posters and mock-ups based on current OMT concepts. Despite the retouching, it could be concluded that the tankers were shown four variants of the combat vehicle.

The other day, clear images of the three proposed concepts have become freely available. Armored vehicles are shown on them from different angles, which allows you to see them well. In addition, the main tactical and technical characteristics and features of the ammunition are given. Of great interest are the published opinions of tank advisers. With all this, there are no materials on the fourth version of the promising tank.

Three options


The first variant of the OMT concept proposes the construction of a tank with a front control compartment, an aft engine compartment and, probably, an uninhabited turret. Its characteristic features include an upper frontal part with a large angle of inclination and two hatches for the crew, a turret with an inclined forehead and a developed aft niche, as well as various attachments of protection. The mass of such a tank is determined at 54,9 tons.

New details of the OMT program: variants of the appearance of tanks
OMT Variant 1 Concept

OMT Var.1 is proposed to be equipped with a 120 mm smoothbore cannon with an automatic loader. On the roof of the tower there are observation devices and two remotely controlled combat modules with 12,7 and 7,62 mm machine guns. The ammunition load includes 28 rounds for various purposes for a cannon, 1 large-caliber rounds and up to 11 rifle cartridges.

The second OMT concept envisages the construction of a tank with a similar architecture, but a different appearance with specific features. For example, a rear-engine hull with a crew "capsule" is used, behind which there is a fighting compartment, which is probably uninhabited. The side projection of the hull is covered with dynamic protection, the stern - with a lattice screen. The tower has an interesting design: a narrow barrel breech casing is attached to the turntable, immediately behind which the dome expands and forms a developed niche. Perhaps it contains ammunition in an automated stowage. The mass of such a tank is almost 59,9 tons.

The OMT Var.2 tank is proposed to be equipped with a 1XX mm cannon with a developed muzzle brake. Additional armament - two DBMs with machine guns of normal and large caliber, as well as a coaxial machine gun. The tower houses a full set of necessary observation and guidance equipment. Ready-to-use gun ammunition - 30 rounds, 6 more were placed in the packing of the second stage. Also, the tank carries 1 rounds for a large-caliber machine gun on the DBM and 11 for the other two.

The third OMT tank concept resembles some modern examples. This is a vehicle of traditional layout with a non-standard two-seat control compartment in the hull and a manned turret. The latter is distinguished by its large size and is capable of carrying appropriate weapons. Unlike other concepts, OMT Var.3 has only obscure hinged screens; reactive armor and grilles, apparently, are not provided. The mass of such a tank will exceed 64,8 tons.

In the picture shown, the OMT Var.3 is equipped with a cannon similar to that used in the second concept. It is a system with a caliber of over 100 mm with a characteristic muzzle brake. The ammunition load, ready and of the second stage, corresponds to the previous concept - 36 shells for various purposes and 12 thousand rounds of two types.


Second version of the tank

A curious feature of all three concepts is the ability to integrate their own reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicle. With its help, the crew will be able to study the terrain and look for targets in the range of ranges of application of tank weapons or beyond. It is possible to introduce specific functions, up to equipping the UAV with one or another weapon.

According to the name of the program, the promising MBT will be able to work under the control of the crew or at the command of a remote operator. However, the published data does not reveal such questions in any way. How the optional crew presence will be implemented is unknown.

Taking into account the wishes


As reported, the tankers from the Fort Benning base appreciated the presented concepts and expressed their opinion. Some of the ideas received support, while others were criticized. Most likely, this will affect the further development of the OMT program.

The tankers confirmed the need to use an auxiliary power unit. With its help, the armored vehicle will be able to perform some functions without starting the main engine. The widespread use of electronic systems makes the APU an indispensable component. It is proposed to introduce an advanced self-diagnosis system that monitors the state of the tank's units. In addition, it is necessary to provide for the possibility of control and combat use with the electrical systems turned off - due to mechanics and hydraulics.

The fighters would like to have an integrated climate control system in the tank, combining air conditioning, heater and collective protection against weapons mass destruction. Such a complex can be controlled from a single control panel, which will relieve workplaces. In addition, during repairs, it will be possible to replace the entire unit as a whole, without reaching individual components.


MBT type OMT Var.3

The fire control system should continue to include independent commander and gunner instruments. Standard devices should be supplemented with a "transparent armor" system and "friend or foe" identification means. It is necessary to further develop navigation aids, incl. with the ability to create a three-dimensional map of the terrain using a standard UAV. Requirements for the gun descent angles remain. Like its predecessors, the new MBT should be able to fire from reverse slopes. It is proposed to develop a new system for countering enemy fire weapons. It should send incorrect data to enemy sensors, interfering with aimed shooting.

The idea of ​​using the UAV was approved, but several proposals were made. So, tankers require the use of optics with good image quality. Desirable auto return feature drone to the carrier tank. There is interest in tethered UAVs powered by tanks and capable of hovering and flying for extended periods of time. The idea of ​​using a light reconnaissance and strike UAV did not find active support. Tankers are interested in getting the maximum firepower, but not at any cost and not at the expense of other functions.

The issues of the operation of equipment in combat conditions did not go unnoticed. So, it is necessary to provide independent evacuation of a damaged armored vehicle or to simplify preparation for towing behind an ARV. Now this requires the efforts of 3-6 people. and quite a long time. In a combat situation, they are all exposed to risks, which, among other things, threaten the evacuation process.

At the evaluation stage


Currently, GVSC continues research work on a promising "optionally manned tank" and searches for the most interesting and useful ideas and solutions. To date, they have been collected into several concept projects with different characteristics. Recently, a regular consultation with future operators took place, based on the results of which new conclusions will be drawn that will determine the further development of the program.

The current stage of work on the OMT will continue until 2023, when it is planned to form the optimal look of the promising MBT. Then the project will be offered to the customer, who will determine his future fate. With a positive decision by the Pentagon, the OMT program will be developed, and by the end of the decade, at least experienced tanks will appear. What they will be is unknown. However, it is quite possible that one of the current concepts will form the basis of a real project.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    17 November 2020 05: 23
    Even there, among the layouts, the Armata platform is present and clearly not in last place! Whatever the Yankees try to make a tank, they even get something Abrams-like as concepts. ...
    1. -5
      17 November 2020 05: 40
      They have no one to joke about "no money, but you hold on." Voters won't understand.
      1. +4
        17 November 2020 14: 08
        they will say "let's print!"
  2. 0
    17 November 2020 05: 24
    The first version is painfully similar to the early Armata concept with a front MTO.
    1. +1
      17 November 2020 06: 19
      Quote: lexus
      The first version is painfully similar to the early Armata concept with a front MTO.

      Aptly noticed! On my own behalf, I will add, I think that our rejection of the front location of the MTO in the Armata project is a step back. The more "objects" in the front projection of the tank, the more protected its crew. I repeat this is my personal opinion.
      1. +2
        17 November 2020 06: 26
        Vlad hi,
        MTO front + tower at the rear = almost perfect weight distribution. For this, EVERYTHING is now.
        1. +4
          17 November 2020 06: 45
          Quote: lexus
          MTO front + tower at the rear = almost perfect weight distribution. For this, EVERYTHING is now.

          little by little everyone comes to the concept
          1. 0
            17 November 2020 21: 35
            Quote: atalef
            little by little everyone comes to the concept

            Slowly towards the concept and further - in the end we will get a hybrid of a tank and a heavy infantry fighting vehicle))))
          2. +1
            18 November 2020 13: 06
            70 tons and mediocre booking ...
          3. +3
            18 November 2020 14: 51
            To be honest. The Merkava isn't the first front-engined concept. I can roughly name at least five domestic and foreign projects. Only our Kharkovites offered two tanks: A-44 and Object - 416. The war prevented the first from entering the series, the second was ahead of its time, could not work out technical problems.
      2. -2
        17 November 2020 14: 16
        And this is our native robbers from the series, to take care of the equipment, and women still give birth to tankers. You can kind of burn down something like that, ala a storm-tanker of a quality tank company (merkavastyle)
      3. 0
        18 November 2020 13: 06
        there is a problem: the engine in the front means that the armor to the critical elements will be thinner ... that is. on the one hand, the crew will be better protected, but on the other hand, the probability of hitting the tank and disabling the engine is higher
    2. +1
      18 November 2020 12: 48
      It hardly looks like the Armata, if the autoloader is in the aft niche, then the crew is probably under the turret, that is, the places are located below the turret shoulder, there will be no empty space under the turret, the capsules are probably not there, although the ammunition is in a separate module (aft niche) better than any crew capsule
  3. +4
    17 November 2020 06: 53
    From appearance, model, concept, sales to real implementation, the path, sometimes, is long! And even before mass production and adoption into service, in general, the distance is long ...
  4. +2
    17 November 2020 09: 55
    The idea of ​​using the UAV was approved, but several proposals were made. So, tankers require the use of optics with good image quality. The function of automatic return of the drone to the carrier tank is desirable. There is interest in tethered UAVs, powered by a tank and capable of hovering and flying for extended periods. The idea of ​​using a light reconnaissance and strike UAV did not find active support. Tankers are interested in getting maximum firepower, but not at any cost and not at the expense of other functions.
    The idea is interesting ... I have been supporting it for a long time! For "Armata" they also offered a "tethered" drone helicopter ... (True, for the last three years "no gu-gu" about this!). An "autonomous" drone is possible, but with a quick "automatic" replacement directly on the tank of a helicopter battery (preferable!) Or even a fuel tank (modular principle ...). The functions of such a UAV are reconnaissance, identification, target designation ... Impact functions are superfluous ... "We don't need a blacksmith ..." Why, then, would a tank have a powerful cannon and a varied "numerous" "assortment" of ammunition? And that's not counting all sorts of "BMPT" there! Tanku needs a distant keen "eye"! (although ... you can consider the KAZ concept in the UAV form factor ...)
    1. +2
      17 November 2020 16: 22
      I also always stoked it about it, but I don't have 1, I need 2-3 with the automatic takeoff / landing / charging.... So that it is possible to keep one in the air almost constantly .. From the equipment a decent camera, thermal imager, laser rangefinder will be enough. Integrating a UAV into an OMS will be very expensive, although very useful .. It goes without saying to leave the possibility of using it on a "leash" even if you have to manually connect the coil with a wire for 99% of the service, this will be enough .. It can be controlled like someone from the tank crew and a remote operator reducing the workload on the crew .. The thing is necessary that will give real progress in the biggest problem of armored vehicles, namely situational awareness ..
      1. +1
        17 November 2020 21: 29
        - Such that it constantly hangs over each car - it will be a little expensive! It may still be on the car of the commander of the roea. And for each tank - such an idea flashed, something like a disposable probe!
        - It fires back from a cassette, to a certain height, drains the information received while hanging in the air, like a lighting mine ... And then it self-destructs, for example.
        1. 0
          17 November 2020 22: 37
          Quote: saygon66
          Such that it constantly hangs over each car - it will be a little expensive!

          What is expensive? How much does one tank shell cost in the course? That UAV as a couple of three shells is quite enough for itself. It will even with a military surcharge of 30-50k \ dollars and business then ..
        2. 0
          18 November 2020 01: 55
          - And how many of them, presumably, should be on a combat vehicle?
          - "Disposable" probes will be more effective due to the primitive design ... And if you manage to fit them into the dimensions of the 902v "Cloud" smoke grenades ... And no maintenance is needed. Loaded - shot - forgot! And if you write in 40 mm VOG - generally a song ... I loaded it into RG6 - and a bullet ... look around ...
        3. 0
          18 November 2020 01: 55
          - And how many of them, presumably, should be on a combat vehicle?
          - "Disposable" probes will be more effective due to the primitive design ... And if you manage to fit them into the dimensions of the 902v "Cloud" smoke grenades ... And no maintenance is needed. Loaded - shot - forgot! And if you write in 40 mm VOG - generally a song ... I loaded it into RG6 - and a bullet ... look around ...
          1. 0
            19 November 2020 08: 44
            Well, such a solution is not superfluous! Why not, the price will rise a little, but the benefits are obvious.
      2. 0
        17 November 2020 21: 33
        Quote: max702
        to be able to keep one in the air almost constantly ..

        It is possible and one, but on a "leash" in the form of a cable - he still does not need to fly far and maneuver, and in flight he can be almost endlessly.
        1. 0
          17 November 2020 22: 39
          Quote: Albert1988
          Quote: max702
          to be able to keep one in the air almost constantly ..

          It is possible and one, but on a "leash" in the form of a cable - he still does not need to fly far and maneuver, and in flight he can be almost endlessly.

          And this option is generally required on any, let's say, shock armored vehicles, armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, tanks, and on the MRAP it will not be superfluous, not to mention reconnaissance vehicles .. Here you have a large series with a lower price per unit ..
      3. 0
        18 November 2020 22: 37
        It is possible and 2-3 ...! But 2-3 for each tank (?) ... somehow it might be "excessive"! But in vain that BMPT was invented for tanks? So this kind of BMPT with 2-3 helicopter-type drones can come in handy! And the savings can be obvious! Such a "BMPT" can be attached to both a platoon and a company ... But in general ... I think that plans for wider use of drones in ground forces (air defense, self-propelled ATGMs ...), for example, as "substitutes" balloons have great potential!
        1. 0
          19 November 2020 08: 43
          The problem is that in real life the "attached" forces and means are always either not enough or they are absent .. Therefore, 2-3 per tank, the price, again, is not great, even if 50k / $ is the norm, the tank costs 5 million / $ 3 tankers with insurance, the cost of studying with a pension to relatives is another 5 million / dollars, and not a completed task due to being ambushed or poor intelligence, how much will it cost? 2-3 UAVs and not as expensive as it turns out against the backdrop of all this .. The talk about excess reminds pre-war arguments about the caliber of the tank, like 76.2 is enough for anything and everything! Life has shown that it will not be enough .. And the fact that cheap is not effective, very quickly came to 100-122mm, and later to 125mm reaching the ceiling at this level of technology ..
  5. +4
    17 November 2020 11: 11
    Recently, various new details appeared in foreign media.
    details of various kinds appeared on The Dead District. With the same success, the results of the work of a children's circle of technical creativity from some Musokhransk can be considered as "concepts".
    Not a single self-respecting specialized edition of these "exercises" has published.
  6. +1
    17 November 2020 14: 11
    Good visibility and field for industrial espionage on indirect. We print, replicate in all countries where we can-read the comments. 100% on the basis and analysis of the comments will be the solution of some conceptual issues on the appearance and need-utility of certain devices. Interestingly, before the start of construction, do we discuss concepts with combat units? Or according to the principle - I gave birth to you here on the basis of exploitation and then you yourself will figure out how to work with the novelty.
  7. +2
    17 November 2020 16: 47
    Everything goes to the fact that the "promising tank" will soon look more like a hybrid of a tank and an air defense system, because the need to fight tanks against helicopters, airplanes, drones and guided munitions will only increase, so something in the style of a hybrid will quite possibly be presented to the world in the future, let the crew be at the same time from the calculation of the air defense and the tank crew, and whoever said that this is bad or impossible, time passes, everything changes
  8. 0
    17 November 2020 23: 17
    The tower has an interesting design: a narrow barrel breech casing is attached to the turntable, immediately behind which the dome expands and forms a developed niche.

    It is possible that such an elongated casing hides long rollback mechanisms. In theory, this makes it possible to attach a large-caliber cannon without any problems. For example 155 mm.
  9. 0
    17 November 2020 23: 31
    And why not make an armored crew compartment in the stern? Convenient doors, quick entry and exit.
  10. 0
    26 December 2020 17: 35
    Americans are cunning and save a lot of money for embezzlement. In order to find out which tank will be fashionable, they make plastic models of tanks and wait for which model children will buy more often. If one model is bought more often by another that tank, its model will go into production. Why is there. A plastic tank in a modern plastic product is as strong as a metal one. And if you wrap it in protective vests, or pillows, then full speed ahead. It can be carried, a soldier can pull such a tank with a cord. And if you also put a propeller and a razor motor on top, then it will fly at near-earth speeds, slightly exceeding the speed of light. Give me a plastic tank!
  11. 0
    31 January 2021 13: 41
    "There is interest in tethered UAVs, powered by a tank and capable of hovering and flying for extended periods."
    Wow ... I first described such a UAV in my book "Tanks are unique and paradoxical" ... and here it is!