In South Korea, a vacuum train almost reaches the speed of sound

202

The vacuum train tests, which have continued in South Korea since 2017, have reached a record speed. It was more than 1000 kilometers per hour.

This is reported by Business Korea.



The principle of such a vehicle, called Hyperloop, was developed in 2012 by Elon Musk. It is based on the movement of capsules through tunnels through an airless environment using magnetic levitation. This allows you to reach significant speeds, and the vehicle moves silently.

At the moment, no company in the world has started the practical use of this transport, which so far exists only in the form of prototypes. One of them is being tested by Korail (Korea Railway Research Institute).

During tests, a smaller version of the capsule accelerated to 1019 km / h. Thus, in South Korea, the vacuum train has almost reached the speed of sound, which is 1193 km / h. It turns out that the South Korean developers managed to break their own record for the Hyperloop when the capsule was accelerated to 714 km / h.

According to Dirk Ahlborn, CEO of US rival Hyperloop TT, South Korea could become the first country in the world to launch a vacuum train transport network. They plan to do this by 2024.
  • KORAIL
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

202 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    16 November 2020 09: 46
    The principle of such a vehicle, called Hyperloop, was developed in 2012 by Elon Musk. It is based on the movement of capsules through tunnels through an airless environment using magnetic levitation.

    This is incorrect information. His idea is to form a vacuum hover train.
    However, the entrepreneur improved the idea: in his opinion, there is no point in striving to achieve a complete vacuum in the pipe. It is enough to maintain a forevacuum, namely, a pressure of 100 Pa (this is 1/1000 of atmospheric pressure) - further pressure reduction is unprofitable, because it leads to an exponential increase in costs. At the same time, the forevacuum can be maintained using pumps of moderate power and pipe walls made of ordinary steel 20–25 mm thick [8].

    However, at the speed envisaged by the project, the vehicle still collides with the oncoming air masses. Musk decided to use them to create an air cushion: special guides and a fan located in the nose of the transport capsule should redirect the oncoming air flow under the bottom. Under conditions of forevacuum, to create an air cushion, it will be enough to provide a pressure of 9,4 kPa, which requires only 200 g of air per second. Thus, Musk abandons the idea of ​​a magnetic cushion, which is much more expensive to implement [8].

    But the companies that make hyperloop decided to eat the monster in parts and first master the molovakkum, and only then the air cushion
    1. +2
      16 November 2020 10: 50
      Quote: BlackMokona
      But the companies that make hyperloop decided to eat the monster in parts and first master the molovakkum, and only then the air cushion

      We can only regret that the Russian "companies" are not going to build anything of the kind.
      1. +10
        16 November 2020 11: 18
        Quote: Stroporez
        All that remains is to regret

        What a life you have if you only have to regret ... crying
        And regret that Russian Railways does not build what you calculated in the note on VO.

        The sadness is universal. wassat
        1. +1
          16 November 2020 11: 24
          Quote: Temples
          The sadness is universal.

          Do not be sad laughing
          Copernicus worked for many years
          To prove the Earth's rotation.
          What a bastard, he'd better get drunk
          She herself would have come into motion.
          Columbus discovered America
          The country is completely alien to us.
          What a bastard! He'd better open
          There is a beer house on our street!
          PySy. This is such a banter for the adepts. wassat
          1. +7
            16 November 2020 11: 43
            So you are sorry.
            You are sad.

            A strange type, at first he regrets, but when you tell him about the emptiness of this melancholy, he gives advice to others.

            love
            1. +2
              16 November 2020 22: 22
              I remember that we had one "businessman" going to build a bridge to Hokkaido. Obviously
              I wanted to make those domestic "locomotives" laugh at Chinese counterfeit goods.
        2. +2
          16 November 2020 21: 26
          It remains to see the area of ​​South Korea. From north to south, 1020 km, from west to east from 175 in narrow to 350 km in wide places. Only accelerated already need to slow down. We would like to cooperate, with our spaces.
      2. +12
        16 November 2020 11: 32
        Quote: Stroporez
        Quote: BlackMokona
        But the companies that make hyperloop decided to eat the monster in parts and first master the molovakkum, and only then the air cushion

        We can only regret that the Russian "companies" are not going to build anything of the kind.

        With our distances we really have to regret. Personally, I am not aware of the domestic work in this direction.
        1. +3
          16 November 2020 22: 23
          Novel hi,
          money is sawed - cartoons are removed. That's all. "There will be no carnival." (FROM)
      3. +1
        16 November 2020 11: 34
        Quote: Stroporez
        Quote: BlackMokona
        But the companies that make hyperloop decided to eat the monster in parts and first master the molovakkum, and only then the air cushion

        We can only regret that the Russian "companies" are not going to build anything of the kind.

        In Russia, it is also not planned to build the Panama Canal, the Channel Tunnel, none of the seven Great Pyramids, the tallest tower in the world and much more in the world.
        Stretch your legs over your clothes.
        But in Russia, the Crimean bridge, for example, was built in record time. And also "Nuclon" is created without noise and dust.
        1. +5
          16 November 2020 12: 03
          Quote: Shuttle
          But in Russia, the Crimean bridge, for example, was built in record time. And also "Nuclon" is created without noise and dust.

          That you are all running around with this bridge, as with a written sack, there are a lot of such projects in the world, see, for example. cable-stayed bridge in Greece, in Africa there are many analogues and most importantly it is 2 times cheaper.
          China offered to build cheaper with infrastructure, for themselves they are doing great construction.
          There were many projects for a bridge like Tormasov.
          1. +8
            16 November 2020 15: 39
            China offered to build cheaper with infrastructure, for themselves they are doing great construction.


            Yes, he did, only these funny guys offer to build with their subsequent control of financial profits. And in another way they do not offer.
            Do not think that they are simpletons.
            And there is no need to cover with the Chinese card, because in this country almost no one knows about pensions. wink
            1. +1
              16 November 2020 16: 11
              Quote: Interlocutor
              And do not cover with a Chinese card, because in this country almost no one knows about pensions

              Yeah, they don't even know they are Chinese. smile
              1. +2
                16 November 2020 16: 28
                In Russia, construction is more difficult than in China, including due to climatic factors and soil characteristics.
                1. +1
                  16 November 2020 16: 32
                  Quote: Vadim237
                  In Russia, construction is more difficult than in China, including due to climatic factors and soil characteristics.

                  Well, yes, it turns out that in the Russian Federation you can only engage in theft.
                  1. +1
                    16 November 2020 22: 34
                    The Chinese have such "business wars" as Vadim go to stadiums "one way."
                2. +1
                  17 November 2020 12: 43
                  Quote: Vadim237
                  In Russia, construction is more difficult than in China, including due to climatic factors and soil characteristics.


                  China has a lot of sedimentary rocks and moisture-saturated soils - the geology there is more complicated.
                  Maglev was built in Shanghai - the foundations of the supports were poured up to 70 m in depth.

                  True, some are building on sedimentary rocks, without a solid foundation ...

                  But these are isolated cases.
                  In the bulk, they build well and reliably.
          2. +8
            16 November 2020 18: 23
            Quote: Stroporez

            That you are all running around with this bridge, as with a written sack, there are a lot of such projects in the world, see, for example. cable-stayed bridge in Greece, in Africa there are many analogues and most importantly it is 2 times cheaper.

            I think I see a rare perfectionist soul mate! Bravo!

            Let's leave the reduction of the intelligence of the interlocutor to the level of near-entrance attendants ...

            Let's compare. What exactly is the bridge in Greece built across the freezing sea? Let's leave the question of soils aside for now.
            1. +1
              16 November 2020 19: 03
              Quote: Shuttle
              I think I see a rare perfectionist soul mate!

              Rather a rationalist laughing
              The Kerch Strait is not the most difficult place in the world in terms of climatic conditions and soils where bridges are built.
              We will most likely not find an exact real analogue, but there were a lot of projects and I posted one of them. hi
              1. +1
                16 November 2020 22: 38
                In Manchuria, about the fact that their climate is milder, did not ... have not heard.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. KCA
          +4
          16 November 2020 12: 27
          And at JINR, the NICA collider is being built, construction is still underway, and the queue for experiments for 25 years from various democratic developed countries
        4. 0
          16 November 2020 15: 07
          Quote: Stroporez
          I can only regret that the Russian "companies" are nothing like are not going to build.

          Quote: Shuttle
          But in Russia, the Crimean bridge, for example, was built in record time.

          How long will all foreign megaprojects be "beaten" by the Crimean bridge? And isn't it logical to compare bridges with bridges, and not with trains and missiles?
          1. +1
            16 November 2020 16: 30
            There are three more hefty bridge projects on the way - over the Volga to Samara - 120 billion rubles, a bridge across the Lena to Yakutsk and a bridge to Sakhalin.
            1. +2
              16 November 2020 16: 50
              Quote: Vadim237
              There are three more hefty bridge projects on the way - over the Volga to Samara - 120 billion rubles, a bridge across the Lena to Yakutsk and a bridge to Sakhalin.

              And what are the dimensions of bridges in billions of rubles? What, what, and we know how to drive huge grandmothers into the project. The estimate for the same Crimean bridge has increased 10 times from the original. And what, in the 21st century, a bridge across a river, even one like the Volga, is already a great achievement?
              Thousands of bridges connecting the Celestial Empire
              More than half a century ago, with the help of the Soviet Union, a bridge was built across the Yangtze River in Wuhan. Thousands of bridges are being built in China every year, and their total number has exceeded a million.

              https://iz.ru/956264/tciao-tczinlian/tysiachi-mostov-obediniaiushchikh-podnebesnuiu
              1. +2
                16 November 2020 22: 08
                "The estimate of the same Crimean bridge has increased tenfold." and more expensive.
                1. -1
                  17 November 2020 15: 25
                  The climate is not the same)
                2. 0
                  17 November 2020 15: 28
                  Quote: Vadim237
                  None of which it did not increase there, as it was 240 billion rubles, so they remained.


                  Quote: Vadim237
                  Russia is not celestial, both in terms of climate and the characteristics of soils, it is much more difficult and more expensive to engage in construction in our country.

                  Enough of telling these tales. Normal climate and soil. Peter was built in the swamp under Peter - he stands and prettier. Finland, Norway, Sweden - cold climate and humidity like our average. Modern technologies and materials are also being improved. Corruption and irresponsibility are the cause of our troubles. In the same China, try the cheating - they will put you in prison, or even to the wall. And here he gave a bribe to whoever needs it - and do as you like for the guests and put a bolt.
      4. -5
        16 November 2020 11: 40
        Do we need such trains? I think not.
        The distances are not the same.
        1. +13
          16 November 2020 12: 17
          If I don't need it, then no one needs it!
          After all, it’s not on the couch, from the capital to the outskirts in 6 hours, you need, as grandfathers bequeathed, a week in a reserved seat, with bears and gypsies.
          1. +4
            16 November 2020 12: 23
            Our people do not go to the bakery on ̶t̶a̶k̶s̶i̶ hyperlupe.
          2. KCA
            +3
            16 November 2020 12: 34
            What are these outskirts? I live at the farthest point Moscow time region, a simple train is slow 2:57, express 2:20
          3. +3
            16 November 2020 13: 41
            That is not. We will easily and at ease dig the Moscow-Vladivostok tunnel. Che is worth it. The truth is, what about nafega?
            1. +2
              16 November 2020 15: 54
              Judging by the minus, someone thinks that it is easy and natural. Or he knows what to dig for.
            2. +5
              16 November 2020 16: 31
              It will be cheaper to build and launch a supersonic passenger airliner than to build such a tunnel.
              1. +1
                16 November 2020 16: 51
                I agree. Moreover, there is experience in this area.
        2. +1
          16 November 2020 12: 19
          How to say. I think that everyone who stood in Moscow traffic jams for at least a week or tried to park, had the thought that "something needs to be done about this."

          Too many people go from the Moscow region to Moscow to work.
          There are electric trains, and they are excellent. A swallow, for example, reaches the center of Moscow from Zelenograd in 30 minutes.
          It is generally unrealistic to leave Balashikha - the whole expensive is one continuous traffic jam.
          Expanding expensive ones is ineffective and in most cases it is simply impossible due to the fact that you will have to demolish everything that is built nearby.

          At the same time, now the difference between travel by train and a car can be 1 hour, but this is not enough to outweigh the advantages of "personal space".
          But if the time is not 30 minutes, but 10 or 6 minutes, the situation can change radically.
          1. +11
            16 November 2020 13: 48
            Maybe just increase the length and number of metro stations by 1,5-2 times?
            Make normal transport hubs and increase the number of parking lots near them.
            And on good terms, it is necessary to drive all business from Moscow to the regions. Then the regions will begin to develop and traffic jams in Moscow will decrease.
            1. 0
              16 November 2020 14: 11
              When I was little, the trains that came to Yuzhnaya were empty, because after that there was only Prague. And from Butovo, which had not yet been so built up, there were buses.

              Now at rush hour, trains come FULL. Those. every 2 trains, from the siding between the South and Prague ones, an EMPTY train is served to the South one. Because the crowd gathers and there is no room on the arriving trains.

              And as if the question - what to do at the crossings in the center? Where are all these people going.
              It is not possible to increase the number of escalators.

              For example, from 5 to 8 on the Komsomolskaya ring road, all escalators work only uphill.
              To get to it, you need to go through the radial.

              So, yes, you rightly need to be comprehensively addressed. Due to one thing - symptomatically, locally, it will be possible to do something but systemically ... only a complex approach.
            2. -3
              16 November 2020 14: 53
              This is true. Gold is mined in the region, even there, in the region, and all the offices are based. And taxes. hi
            3. +3
              16 November 2020 16: 51
              The Moscow issue can be solved by moving the capital, for example, to Siberia. I took the state. position - go to Siberia, office housing, public transport for everyone, canteens, etc. Build a village in the suburbs for guards, maids, drivers, cooks, guests, etc.
              Everyone in sight, brought a suitcase of money who signed up for an appointment with the official, questions will arise immediately at the airport.
              They fired the official, rented out the apartment and went to the people.
              And so it's all the same that they live in a closed city that is open.
              1. +1
                16 November 2020 17: 01
                The "servants of the people" will scatter. Who will serve?
                1. +4
                  16 November 2020 17: 21
                  That will become clear. Is it okay for the military, but not for the servants?
      5. -1
        16 November 2020 23: 44
        Quote: Stroporez
        We can only regret that the Russian "companies" are not going to build anything of the kind.

        Why do we need a super-high-speed train, given our size of the country? Do we overstrain and rebuild the tracks for super-speed? Recently it was infa that we began to build a plant for the construction of high-speed trains capable of driving over 300 km ... I think this is quite normal.
      6. +1
        17 November 2020 10: 39
        while in the DPRK
  2. +12
    16 November 2020 09: 48
    Well, well, the engineers can be congratulated on their success.
  3. +21
    16 November 2020 09: 50
    The principle of such a vehicle, called Hyperloop, was developed in 2012 by Elon Musk.
    Yes?????? Ailon Musk seems to have read SOVIET FANTASY well ...
    1. 0
      16 November 2020 09: 55
      Check out the first commentary, where I explained how hyperloop differs from fiction trains
      1. +11
        16 November 2020 10: 14
        Quote: BlackMokona
        Check out the first commentary, where I explained how hyperloop differs from fiction trains

        Each has its own role. Scientists give an idea, and engineers implement it
        1. +2
          16 November 2020 10: 24
          I have never met the ideas of vacuum hover trains among science fiction writers.
          All the same, reality can be much more fantastic than books.
          1. +15
            16 November 2020 10: 31
            Quote: BlackMokona
            I have never met the ideas of vacuum hover trains among science fiction writers.

            I will not argue in technical aspects, but at Kazantsev's, on his "Arctic bridge" the trains moved in a vacuum. And he wrote the first version of this work in 1941
            Quote: BlackMokona
            All the same, reality can be much more fantastic than books.

            It is foolish to argue, but it is also true that modern science fiction paints such worlds that we obviously will not live to see, sometimes fortunately
            1. +4
              16 November 2020 11: 04
              Quote: svp67
              It is foolish to argue, but it is also true that modern science fiction paints such worlds that we obviously will not live to see, sometimes fortunately

              Colleague hi , Captain Nemo with his Nautilus was also from once a fantasy. wink
              In fact, the question stands in this way, either we are finally rolling back to the margins of world technologies and development in general, or .... Now we are confidently being led to Papuan and many do not want to understand that the 21st century is already in the yard and it has even begun. decade, and we continue to rejoice at the interpretations of the Kalashnikov assault rifle.
              Pysy. about kalashmat is me so by the way. feel
              1. +7
                16 November 2020 11: 32
                Submarines were not invented by science fiction writer Jules.
                Verne followed the engineering findings and sent his hero to sail the seas on a submarine, which was in full swing developed by engineers from different countries at that time.

                Like all other science fiction writers, Judge Verne did not invent anything new for the engineers of his time.

                All flights to the moon and under water were first described in their works by scientists engineers, and then science fiction writers used these works in their books.
                Of course, science fiction ships became large, with toilets, cabins, crew quarters, and other household furnishings.
                In fact, only the existence of everyday life was fiction.

                Reducing resistance to zero during cargo delivery is neither fantastic nor news.

                The news will be the actually built object.

                And business will appreciate the effectiveness of this transport corridor.

                The Concorde flew fast .... but expensive!
                As a result, there is no Concorde, just as there is no TU-144.
                And it doesn't matter who was the first to create and who was the first to understand the unprofitability of this type of transport.

                A smart one will not go uphill, a smart one will bypass a mountain. wink
            2. +1
              16 November 2020 13: 13
              that modern science fiction paints such worlds that we obviously will not live up to, sometimes fortunately

              Contemporary science fiction? Is there such a thing?
              1. +3
                16 November 2020 17: 30
                Quote: alexmach
                Contemporary science fiction? Is there such a thing?

                In abundance and in variety
    2. +4
      16 November 2020 10: 01
      Quote: svp67
      Yes?????? Ailon Musk seems to have read SOVIET FANTASY well ...

      Exactly! It would be necessary to make the fraudster and the plagiarist pay for the idea. By the way, let him pay for the idea of ​​Konstantin Eduardovich about space flights. And then, scattered here, you know!
      ... On November 15, the Falcon 9 launch vehicle with the Crew Dragon spacecraft and four astronauts on board successfully launched in Florida. Nine minutes after launch, the first stage of the Falcon 9 landed on a floating platform in the Atlantic Ocean. Soon it was reported that Crew Dragon was in orbit and heading for the International Space Station.
      1. +6
        16 November 2020 10: 16
        Quote: A. Privalov
        Exactly! It would be necessary to make the fraudster and the plagiarist pay for the idea.

        Yes, and we don’t forget to pay extra for Jules Verne's submarines.
        In this world, everyone has their own role, someone dreams and gives out ideas, and someone embodies them ...
        1. +1
          16 November 2020 10: 32
          Quote: svp67
          In this world, everyone has their own role, someone dreams and gives out ideas, and someone embodies them

          Quite right. Today, paradoxically, new, practically on the verge of extravagance, ideas are in great demand. hi
        2. +3
          16 November 2020 10: 54
          Yes, and we don’t forget to pay extra for Jules Verne's submarines.
          Is it because Peter I stole the idea of ​​a "hidden vessel"? Gyyy))). Again they should remain for us wassat
    3. +9
      16 November 2020 10: 39
      It is generally desirable to read Soviet Science Fiction for everyone. There are ideas for a couple of centuries ahead.
    4. 0
      17 November 2020 13: 32
      I read your dispute, let me insert my 5 kopecks))
      The situation with Soviet science fiction is not new. Moreover, many Soviet inventions suffered the same fate.

      I couldn't find it, but somewhere there was a video of how one person spoke very well at the summit, and not Russian, but someone from the West. The bottom line is that he listed many inventions (not a concept but prototypes) that were created in the USSR and Russia. But they did not get success in implementation. Like - the first flew into space, but what market share do Russian telecommunications companies have (satellite broadcasting, etc.)? There have been tremendous advances in computing systems - what market share do Russian companies have, etc.
      And indeed it is. Moreover, I graduated from the Lyceum at MEPhI but went into economics and finance. planning. Many of my classmates in the lyceum, looked at it as not degradation, they say, where is the ENGINEER-PHYSICIST and where is the MANAGER? Well, it turned out that there are many inventions, but there was no one to bring all these inventions to mind and make them commercially successful.
      And this is very annoying ...
  4. 0
    16 November 2020 09: 50
    Well, this does not threaten us, because the ticket price (for sure) will be more expensive than a flight on a rocket.
    1. +13
      16 November 2020 10: 06
      The cost of building, maintaining and repairing such highways will be sky-high, especially at Russian distances. Plus, there will be high requirements not only for the tightness of such a line, but also for the rolling stock. The slightest violation of the tightness and the dead will arrive before the final. So the price will be great everywhere. Scientists wrote about such vehicles even when Elon Musk was himself at the manufacturing stage, so this is not his idea, he just decided to repeat it.
      1. +1
        16 November 2020 10: 43
        The use of such transport for passenger transportation is doubtful. Acceleration and overload. But for the transportation of goods is quite suitable.
  5. +16
    16 November 2020 09: 57
    They could have done more, but then Korea ended.
    1. -7
      16 November 2020 10: 03
      This is not our "development path". Our way is to "pull new pipelines", to protect them .... to dig new natural resources for sale abroad, and recently, disguisedly sell our territories under the guise of concessions, TOPs, etc. ... And "hyperloop" is the field of fiction, Martian development, this is on another planet, as we were taught from the very beginning, this cannot be and it is not profitable ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        16 November 2020 10: 11
        In this comment, you immediately feel "deep" knowledge of technical issues!
        1. +2
          16 November 2020 10: 15
          Yes Yes. I remember saying (and now here, on the forum, many say)
          about the Mask-type, he is not a "professional", he is a "charlatan" and so on ... Here is a broadcast of his latest "charlatanism":

          But don't be discouraged. This cannot be, it was Hollywood filmed "in a hangar" in the way that this cannot happen in the United States - now everything is ruined there, the country is on the verge of a civil war due to elections, and "black protests", and they have a crisis, in which the "dollar will collapse soon" and all that ....
          1. +5
            16 November 2020 10: 45
            Can you breathe vacuum? Have you ever tried to lower the pressure to at least 100 Pa? Do you have any idea what will happen to the rolling stock in the pipe if the air pressure rises sharply 5-10 times from the working one at the maximum speed? If you provide the necessary security and solve all the technical issues, then you yourself will see that you can only transport millionaires. But would they want to ride it?
          2. -3
            16 November 2020 10: 48
            This cannot be, it was Hollywood filmed "in a hangar" in the way that this cannot happen in the United States - now everything is ruined there, the country is on the verge of a civil war because of elections, and "black protests", and they have a crisis, in which the "dollar will collapse soon" and all that ....


            1. Rogozin Boh of Cosmonautics.
            2. Mask is a swindler, a bullet is a fool - a good fellow.
            3. All your kompukters are children's toys.
            4. All these UAVs of yours are children's aircraft modeling circles.
            5. The dollar is over, the US has a huge debt, but we do not.
            6. The F-35 penguin will never fly, no one will buy it.
            7. Do you want to be like in Ukraine?

            Those who are against these judgments are a magpie and a navalnik.
          3. +7
            16 November 2020 10: 51
            Musk, by the way, also recently tested his hyperloop train with people.
            Works. The first customer is London Heathrow Airport.
          4. 0
            17 November 2020 10: 56
            Another one thinks that Musk did everything himself, he built it himself! When you naive Chukchi will transfer already. There, state money has been poured in immeasurably and corporations work for him.
        2. +4
          16 November 2020 11: 48
          Quote: Horon
          In this comment, you immediately feel "deep" knowledge of technical issues!

          Uh-huh. And what is the depth of legal knowledge in terms of concessions, TORs ... lol
          Or maybe it is true - who needs it, think about all these tedious and obscene issues of technical and infrastructural support for the functioning and logistics of railway transport ... Well, all these switches, station tracks, marshalling humps, turntables, etc.
          This was all invented by the "retrograde engineers", and the "brilliant" manager Musk is a completely different matter! He will find "how" and "what" to replace all this within the framework of a vacuum hyperloop ...
          He said - our business is a pipe with a vacuum, so the business is a pipe ... with a vacuum. lol
          1. +2
            16 November 2020 12: 09
            Musk only repeated an idea that has existed for about half a century, only trying to solve it with modern means, mixing several technical trends and creating advertising hype around it. Although many safety and cost issues remain unresolved. It's like with cell phones: first they say what a useful thing it is, and then they modestly explain that it is better to use them at a distance, so as not to get yourself brain cancer, and even carrying it in your pocket is not advisable. But the majority hears only the first thing that is said loudly and does not hear what is said quietly by scientists and doctors!
      3. +3
        16 November 2020 10: 15
        Why are you so critical, the epic of hyperloops has already ended even in Ukraine))) and earlier it was very popular there)))
      4. +2
        16 November 2020 11: 15
        Quote: Snail N9
        This is not our "development path". Our way is to "pull new pipelines", to protect them .... to dig new natural resources for sale abroad, and recently, disguisedly sell our territories under the guise of concessions, TOPs, etc. ... And "hyperloop" is the field of fiction, Martian development, this is on another planet, as we were taught from the very beginning, this cannot be and it is not profitable ...


        This is just our topic. But it is necessary to re-lay the railway. See how our railway roads go in zigzags. At all these turns, the high-speed train will fly off the rail. It is necessary to straighten the areas. The Chinese did so. I rode their high-speed train. 750 km. We arrived in 3 hours. With stops. They found the resources. Note, when our "high-speed" trains (Swallows) were launched, and then the passenger logistics improved (after graduation, the son stayed in Tver, 2,5 hours and you are in Moscow).
        So that's our topic. But there is no money.
        1. +1
          16 November 2020 11: 20
          Quote: sergo1914
          So that's our topic. But there is no money.

          The current money will not be for anything but himself and his homies.
          1. -1
            16 November 2020 12: 40
            And here's another "news" arrived in time from the well-known hero from the cohort of "effective managers" of the Kremlin spill:
            The state corporation Roskosmos plans to rename the state trading corporation Roscosmos from 2021 - this decision was made due to the fact that revenues from space exploration are seriously falling.

            The head of the company, Dmitry Rogozin, explained that the company can earn more from trading than from space launches. Russia, he believes, has a "unique space brand that can bring in millions."

            “On the example of mugs. Who will buy a mug with Elon Musk? None. This is not a brand, it is not interesting to anyone. And everyone will buy a mug with Gagarin, ”he said.

            At the same time, Rogozin clarified, the organization will not completely abandon space launches - there is a space program that should be carried out, although most likely this will happen "in a truncated form."

            “Our main goal is still to make money, and not be compared with someone else's technology. We will leave the launches, but we will not be considered a priority, ”added the head

            https://123ru.net/moscow/265558481/
            Everything is correct, "the huckster" is in power ".... you say technology .... the economy of the 5th technological order .. flights to Mars and the Moon ..." 25 million highly paid high-tech jobs "... well, well ... Here are the "mugs" for tourists (read - buses from the Papuans) - yes! ....
            1. 0
              16 November 2020 12: 57
              By the way, the above-mentioned type of "news" refers us to "Panorama" - an unreliable source, "liberal" sense - Fu-u. Yes
              1. +2
                16 November 2020 15: 15
                Nonsense libersmi should not be carried here.

                The same NASA has with manufacturers for their brands with names.
              2. +1
                16 November 2020 22: 51
                Rogozin was left to produce personalized "night vases". In their "content" he is a pro.
        2. The comment was deleted.
  6. +3
    16 November 2020 09: 59
    This type of transport will be much more expensive than planes, and therefore not very promising. Service and safety are also in question
    1. 0
      16 November 2020 10: 02
      He is generally hopeless.
    2. 0
      16 November 2020 10: 04
      Quote: loki565
      This type of transport will be much more expensive than planes, and therefore not very promising. Service and safety are also in question

      There are enough people in this world with large intestines, this type of transport will be much safer than an airplane and as the technology is mastered, the price of a ticket will fall
      1. +4
        16 November 2020 10: 10
        Quote: Vol4ara
        this type of transport will be much safer than an airplane

        And security, excuse me, in what? In the future, die from a sharp drop in pressure, in the event of a capsule depressurization? Or, in the long term, to burn out alive, in the event of a fire due to the impossibility of evacuation from the capsule moving along a vacuum tube?
        1. -1
          16 November 2020 10: 53
          Quote: Ded_Mazay
          Quote: Vol4ara
          this type of transport will be much safer than an airplane

          And security, excuse me, in what? In the future, die from a sharp drop in pressure, in the event of a capsule depressurization? Or, in the long term, to burn out alive, in the event of a fire due to the impossibility of evacuation from the capsule moving along a vacuum tube?

          In the future, a fire on board an aircraft is guaranteed death, and when depressurizing, breathe, whatever is there, what is there from oxygen masks. But only if the plane's engines stop, it will fall, and the hyperloop does not have an engine as such, there are no spinning and rubbing parts under a huge temperature with tons of fuel on board and if something fails there, it will simply stop. And if a stupid pilot comes across who decides to put the son of Eldar at the helm, as we had, or fly around the storm front and dump 154 ​​into a tailspin, as again it was with us, then in the case of a hyperloop, the stupid pilot can only play a little with speed, more likely the whole pilot will not be at all
          1. +4
            16 November 2020 11: 22
            Quote: Vol4ara
            and when depressurizing, breathe, what is there, what is there from oxygen masks

            Do you understand the difference between "atmospheric pressure at the echelon" and "vacuum in the tube"?
            At sea level, the atmospheric pressure is about 100 Pa, at an altitude of 000 meters, it is about 10 Pa, the pressure in the hyperloop tube is declared at 000 (!) Pa. 26/000 of atmospheric!

            Therefore, the maximum that threatens you in an airliner is loss of consciousness due to lack of oxygen. Even if the decompression of the board is explosive, there will still be a chance that the crew will retain control of the aircraft, lower the altitude and land it.
            And if the same happens in the hyperloop, then this is a very big question - how will the attempt to breathe out of it end for your lungs ...
            1. -5
              16 November 2020 11: 41
              In the event of an accident, you can simply depressurize the pipe section
              1. +3
                16 November 2020 11: 56
                Quote: BlackMokona
                In the event of an accident, you can simply depressurize the pipe section

                Can you hear the technical details?
                Well, for example: "how will the pipe section be limited", "how will the pressure equalization with atmospheric pressure be carried out", "how will the evacuation of passengers from the capsule in the isolated section be carried out", etc.?
                In words - everything is easy, easy and simple, but in practice ...
                1. -3
                  16 November 2020 12: 04
                  Quote: Ded_Mazay
                  Quote: BlackMokona
                  In the event of an accident, you can simply depressurize the pipe section

                  Can you hear the technical details?
                  Well, for example: "how will the pipe section be limited", "how will the pressure equalization with atmospheric pressure be carried out", "how will the evacuation of passengers from the capsule in the isolated section be carried out", etc.?
                  In words - everything is easy, easy and simple, but in practice ...

                  I don't see any problems, but for technical details to the developers
                  1. +2
                    16 November 2020 12: 06
                    Quote: Vol4ara
                    I don't see any problems, but for technical details to the developers

                    Well, these are your vision problems, not a sign of their absence.
                2. -2
                  16 November 2020 12: 45
                  Therefore, they have been conducting research for so many years, and not immediately building thousands of kilometers of routes. To optimize, think over and test everything in practice
                  1. 0
                    16 November 2020 13: 52
                    Quote: BlackMokona
                    Therefore, they have been conducting research for so many years, and not immediately building thousands of kilometers of routes. To optimize, think over and test everything in practice

                    As a result of research, one can come not only to a working system, but also to the realization of complete hopelessness or limited suitability. Little, you might think, there were developments in which they invested a lot of money, but everything ended in nothing.
                    1. -2
                      16 November 2020 15: 38
                      So this is also a positive result of research and saving a lot of money. In any case, only after the completion of all developments will decisions be made for the thousand-kilometer routes.
                      1. +1
                        16 November 2020 17: 06
                        Quote: BlackMokona
                        So this is also a positive result of research and saving a lot of money. In any case, only after the completion of all developments will decisions be made for the thousand-kilometer routes.

                        If, in the end, the cost of a ticket for GL on the Moscow-St. Petersburg route will be 27 rubles, as calculated by the staff of the Institute for Problems of Natural Monopolies, then it is clear that there will be no Moscow-St. Petersburg hyperloop , since the trip on the "Sapsan" at the time of the study cost 500 - 4 rubles.
                      2. -3
                        16 November 2020 17: 46
                        Rosskosmos also believed that reusable rockets were more expensive than conventional ones. And now reusability has been declared the highest priority winked
                      3. 0
                        16 November 2020 19: 11
                        Quote: BlackMokona
                        Rosskosmos also believed that reusable rockets were more expensive than conventional ones. And now reusability has been declared the highest priority

                        Well, on this "thoughtful" off-top and I propose to end the exchange of views ... All the best. hi
      2. +4
        16 November 2020 10: 11
        There are enough people in this world with large intestines, this type of transport will be much safer than an airplane and as the technology is mastered, the price of a ticket will fall

        As the Concorde showed, speed is not important)) What makes you think that it will be safer than aircraft? At these speeds, any crash would be equal to a plane crash. Plus, the depressurization of the apparatus threatens a number of problems for passengers, from the fact that they will have nothing to breathe to barotrauma and decompression sickness.
        1. -3
          16 November 2020 10: 58
          Quote: loki565
          There are enough people in this world with large intestines, this type of transport will be much safer than an airplane and as the technology is mastered, the price of a ticket will fall

          As the Concorde showed, speed is not important)) What makes you think that it will be safer than aircraft? At these speeds, any crash would be equal to a plane crash. Plus, the depressurization of the apparatus threatens a number of problems for passengers, from the fact that they will have nothing to breathe to barotrauma and decompression sickness.

          Of course, speed is not the main thing, there is no main thing here at all. And safety is higher, because where there is no engine as such and fuel on board, safety is higher. The technology is as simple as a stick, only expensive, the pipe will be more difficult to make than the hyperloop itself. Most accidents on takeoffs and landings, there are no takeoffs and landings and there is no bad visibility and a pilot is not needed
      3. +3
        16 November 2020 10: 15
        People with "big wallets" are very sensitive to issues related to their health, and breathing a vacuum is very problematic.
        1. -1
          16 November 2020 10: 59
          Quote: Horon
          People with "big wallets" are very sensitive to issues related to their health, and breathing a vacuum is very problematic.

          Falling from 10 km is also not a thrill and breathing 10 km there is also problematic
          1. +4
            16 November 2020 11: 48
            It is not the height that kills, but the speed. The speed on this transport will be enormous and quite comparable to the speed of an aircraft. There is no fuel, but there is a vacuum. In an enclosed space at such speeds, a relatively small air pressure caused by the loss of tightness can lead to the capsule breaking off and colliding with the walls of the tunnel, which, if it does not lead to serious damage to the capsule, but can cause depressurization and instant death of people. Further, there are many more questions on the situational solution of certain problems. For example: if an accident occurs in a tunnel with a short distance, then filling it with air and sending the rescue team will not take much time (distance 25-40 km), if the distance turns out to be 100-500 km or more, the efficiency will be so slow that corpses will be removed from the capsule.
            1. -1
              16 November 2020 12: 08
              Quote: Horon
              It is not the height that kills, but the speed. The speed on this transport will be enormous and quite comparable to the speed of an aircraft. There is no fuel, but there is a vacuum. In an enclosed space at such speeds, a relatively small air pressure caused by the loss of tightness can lead to the capsule breaking off and colliding with the walls of the tunnel, which, if it does not lead to serious damage to the capsule, but can cause depressurization and instant death of people. Further, there are many more questions on the situational solution of certain problems. For example: if an accident occurs in a tunnel with a short distance, then filling it with air and sending the rescue team will not take much time (distance 25-40 km), if the distance turns out to be 100-500 km or more, the efficiency will be so slow that corpses will be removed from the capsule.

              The vertical speed kills, and here it is equal to 0. To make a solid structure without wings and which is on the ground is much easier than the one in the sky. There will be accidents, but there will be less of them by a couple of orders of magnitude and there will be a chance to survive. There is no chance to survive on a plane when it falls
              1. +4
                16 November 2020 12: 24
                Vertical speed kills, but here it is equal to 0

                fool When some aircraft crashed, the vertical speed was comparable to the speed of a parachutist, but it ended in tragedy! Even the firefighters and ambulances, who arrived on time, were unable to help. Accidents on the roads with fatalities are also the result of the impact of speed, there is no vertical speed either! It does not matter what the velocity vector is, it is important how it will be extinguished later. The higher the speed, the more difficult it is to extinguish it, the longer it takes to reduce it safely and the more serious the consequences of collision with other objects.
                1. -1
                  16 November 2020 13: 05
                  Quote: Horon
                  Vertical speed kills, but here it is equal to 0

                  fool When some aircraft crashed, the vertical speed was comparable to the speed of a parachutist, but it ended in tragedy! Even the firefighters and ambulances, who arrived on time, were unable to help. Accidents on the roads with fatalities are also the result of the impact of speed, there is no vertical speed either! It does not matter what the velocity vector is, it is important how it will be extinguished later. The higher the speed, the more difficult it is to extinguish it, the longer it takes to reduce it safely and the more serious the consequences of collision with other objects.

                  There the structure is about the complexity of a generator in a tractor. There is nothing to break there. the biggest problem will not be the capsule itself, but the pipe
                  1. +1
                    16 November 2020 14: 12
                    The capsule moves at a very low pressure, close to vacuum, which means it will be necessary to ensure the locking and tightness of the capsule. Even a short circuit can become deadly, just like on an airplane. The two biggest dangers comparing this form of transport to aviation are the use of very low pressure and high speeds. Each of its use will be marked by a large amount of preparatory work and the intervals between flights will be almost like that of aviation when preparing an airliner. I am not saying that it is not possible, I am saying that it will be expensive, and the cost reduction is possible only by reducing security.
                    1. +1
                      16 November 2020 16: 13
                      Quote: Horon
                      The capsule moves at a very low pressure, close to vacuum, which means it will be necessary to ensure the locking and tightness of the capsule. Even a short circuit can become deadly, just like on an airplane. The two biggest dangers comparing this form of transport to aviation are the use of very low pressure and high speeds. Each of its use will be marked by a large amount of preparatory work and the intervals between flights will be almost like that of aviation when preparing an airliner. I am not saying that it is not possible, I am saying that it will be expensive, and the cost reduction is possible only by reducing security.

                      If something happened in flight, for example, an engine fire (which is not in the hyperloop as well as an open flame and fuel), then it is either a spin and death at once or an emergency landing at the nearest airfield with the remaining engines. If something happened during a trip on a hyperloop, it is a power outage, magnetic braking and depressurization of the pipe sluice. These are colossally different levels of danger, they did not stand nearby
                      1. 0
                        16 November 2020 16: 43
                        If there is a fire of one engine on the plane, then the plane will quite normally get to the nearest airfield, no need to exaggerate. If there is a fire in the capsule, then first it must be stopped. At these speeds, this process is not fast and will take more than ten minutes. Further, the depressurization should be smooth, not shock. Shock filling of the pipe with air can damage both the pipe itself (process equipment) and the moving part and possibly cause injury to passengers. The pipe, it is also a pipe in Africa, will it be provided with emergency lighting in case of an emergency stop? How long will it take for the rescue team to approach the emergency site? How long will it take to evacuate passengers? Whatever one may say, otherwise it comes out. Everything becomes much more attractive if the pressure does not change, the speed drops to 500 km / h, and instead of a pipe, a usual fence. Only this is no longer Musk!
                      2. +2
                        16 November 2020 19: 01
                        Quote: Horon
                        If there is a fire of one engine on the plane, then the plane will quite normally get to the nearest airfield, no need to exaggerate. If there is a fire in the capsule, then first it must be stopped. At these speeds, this process is not fast and will take more than ten minutes. Further, the depressurization should be smooth, not shock. Shock filling of the pipe with air can damage both the pipe itself (process equipment) and the moving part and possibly cause injury to passengers. The pipe, it is also a pipe in Africa, will it be provided with emergency lighting in case of an emergency stop? How long will it take for the rescue team to approach the emergency site? How long will it take to evacuate passengers? Whatever one may say, otherwise it comes out. Everything becomes much more attractive if the pressure does not change, the speed drops to 500 km / h, and instead of a pipe, a usual fence. Only this is no longer Musk!

                        Braking by a magnetic field, no rubbing parts, no more than a couple of minutes. Raise from vacuum to 1 atmosphere in less than a minute. There can be no fire in a vacuum. There is nothing special to burn in the cabin. Providing fire safety is a thousand times easier than by plane. Do you hear a lot of fires on trains? this thing is many times more fireproof
                      3. 0
                        17 November 2020 08: 59
                        Braking by a magnetic field, no rubbing parts, no more than a couple of minutes. Raise from vacuum to 1 atmosphere in less than a minute.

                        Yes, at least how to slow down! 2 minutes of braking is possible only if there are seat belts and it is not possible for passengers to move inside. Braking by a magnetic field still does not exclude heat release during the dissipation of kinetic energy. In less than a minute with large volumes, this is explosive de-meting.
                        There is nothing special to burn in the cabin. Providing fire safety is a thousand times easier than on an airplane. Do you hear a lot of train fires? this thing is many times more fireproof

                        There is always something to burn in modern transport. For lighting inside the capsule, you need at least wiring and batteries, for sure there will be more than lighting. Trains, or rather wagons, do not burn often, but there are plenty of cases. The cause is both human error and equipment problems.
          2. +5
            16 November 2020 12: 07
            So the safest is an airplane with an ejection seat, it has no problems even on the ground, eject at least 10 km, the parachute will open at a safe altitude. I don’t understand why rich people haven’t done this yet))) Here is an accident at a speed of 190 km / h, and if this happens at 700 km / h, there will be no survivors.
            1. -1
              16 November 2020 12: 14
              Quote: loki565
              So the safest is an airplane with an ejection seat, it has no problems even on the ground, eject at least 10 km, the parachute will open at a safe altitude. I don’t understand why rich people haven’t done this yet))) Here is an accident at a speed of 190 km / h, and if this happens at 700 km / h, there will be no survivors.

              This is a simple question, you will find the answer to it in the first link in Google. I will not quote, if you are really interested, you will find it yourself.
              The video is not hyperloop. Do you need to provide a video of the plane crash? About the absence of survivors at 700 km h, this is your speculation, if you want to prove the opposite, give the facts
        2. -1
          16 November 2020 15: 07
          People with big wallets fly on private jets
          And they are in no hurry to go anywhere, because they will still wait hi
          But the hangers-on "of the West and its values" with might and main drown about the backwardness of the Russian Railways and the great future of the hyperloop, without even thinking that they will not even be allowed to get close to this product, if it ever leaves the test sites! wink
          1. +2
            16 November 2020 16: 16
            Quote: VORON538
            People with big wallets fly on private jets
            And they are in no hurry to go anywhere, because they will still wait hi
            But the hangers-on "of the West and its values" with might and main drown about the backwardness of the Russian Railways and the great future of the hyperloop, without even thinking that they will not even be allowed to get close to this product, if it ever leaves the test sites! wink

            the next 15-30 years will be expensive, then at the price of an aircraft. In the Russian Federation, and so the values ​​of the West, since 91.
            https://mc.bk55.ru/news/article/7483/ пламенный привет вашим ценностям.
      4. +3
        16 November 2020 11: 11
        Quote: Vol4ara
        There are enough people in this world with large intestines, this type of transport will be much safer than an airplane and as the technology is mastered, the price of a ticket will fall

        I agree with you, progress cannot be stopped. As technology advances, costs will decrease and safety will improve
        1. +1
          16 November 2020 12: 09
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          I agree with you, progress cannot be stopped. As technology advances, costs will decrease and safety will improve

          Progress is not an autobahn for you, there are dead ends on its way. Airships for example.
  7. +6
    16 November 2020 10: 05
    The vacuum train tests, which have continued in South Korea since 2017, have reached a record speed. It was more than 1000 kilometers per hour.

    What for? belay belay
    You have nowhere to go there, everything is already side by side, close by. And for long distances you will "wear out" vacuum tubes for it! The trip will be more expensive than planes.
    1. -1
      16 November 2020 10: 11
      A number of companies and organizations believe that it will be cheaper
    2. +2
      16 November 2020 10: 14
      The world's busiest airline is located in Korea (Seoul-Jeju). And the more passengers there are, the faster the investment will pay off. Trains can be more attractive than planes because they leave from city centers and do not require the strong security lines at airports. The flight from Seoul to Jeju lasts an hour, but at the airport it takes an hour to check-in, and it takes at least an hour to get to the airport (actually more) - you can save more than half of the travel time.
      1. +4
        16 November 2020 10: 32
        Rather, the security will be the same, plus will these pipes run on the surface or underground? if on the surface they are very vulnerable even more than the plane. If underground, then the price tag will be really cosmic. And time will be lost in the airlock chambers, where they will constantly pump and evacuate air.
  8. +6
    16 November 2020 10: 15
    By the way, if we talk about Ilona, ​​then the first full-fledged crew was sent to the ISS. Due to the transfer, they will catch up with the ISS for a day, instead of 8 hours.

    This launch is also notable for the fact that grandfathers are flying there.
    Noguchi - 55 years old
    Shannon - 55 years old
    Hopkins - 51
    Glover - 44

    Axium has installed its sensors - and will take telemetry, as well as work with Shannon Walker and Hopkins on the survey. The goal is to understand the limits of minimum availability and health for space tourists. Next year - 3 tourists fly on the Dragon under the guidance of one astronaut / commander.
    1. 0
      16 November 2020 15: 30
      This launch is also notable for the fact that grandfathers are flying there.

      Running from the COVID-19 epidemic? laughing
      1. +3
        16 November 2020 15: 45
        The current state of the western manned program. Second flight if anything:
        Sand - 42 years old, the youngest.
        Hoshide - 51
        Meg MacArthur - 49
        Cybroch - 53

        Boeing test:
        Wilmore - 57
        Finke - 53
        Nicole Mann - 43 (she was selected in 2013 in the space squad, only now the first flight).

        Boeing first:
        legendary Sunni (50 hours of EVA, this is not a joke, among all Russians, only Yurchikhin and Solovyov have more) - 55 (there will be 56 for the flight)
        Jeannette Epps is 50 (she will be 51 for the flight).
        Cassidy - 47

        For Roskosmos, 50 is already a cosmopension.
        1. -2
          16 November 2020 15: 55
          The younger the body, the easier it can endure stress and stress, the higher the reaction. If a cosmonaut is a professional, then 50 years is already really cosmopeness, but for tourists it is quite normal. After all, they do not need to make decisions and manage the QC, they only need to imitate their activities and return to Earth, on the wing of hired doctors.
          1. +1
            16 November 2020 17: 41
            Well, these are full-time crews. Those who flew away in the morning, for 6 months. There will be many EVAs. This is far from tourism.
            1. 0
              17 November 2020 08: 35
              To send a full-fledged crew at this age ...! That Americans have run out of youth or the costs of modern education? Or don't you feel sorry for these?
  9. -3
    16 November 2020 10: 16
    Is this a military train?
  10. +7
    16 November 2020 10: 18
    During tests, a smaller version of the capsule accelerated to 1019 km / h.
    The key word is "reduced".
    "Piques interest
    And another cut: "
    How far did the "train" travel?
    How much did this express weigh?

    How many liters of miracle vacuum
    made up inside the pipe?
    ...
    Thus, in South Korea, the vacuum train has almost reached the speed of sound, which is 1193 km / h.
    Is where, in a vacuum ?! belay fool
    1. -1
      16 November 2020 11: 01
      Quote: abrakadabre
      During tests, a smaller version of the capsule accelerated to 1019 km / h.
      The key word is "reduced".
      "Piques interest
      And another cut: "
      How far did the "train" travel?
      How much did this express weigh?

      How many liters of miracle vacuum
      made up inside the pipe?
      ...
      Thus, in South Korea, the vacuum train has almost reached the speed of sound, which is 1193 km / h.
      Is where, in a vacuum ?! belay fool

      Just google the name of the train on the picture. The SUMA550-01 is a maglev train. Technology will soon hit 40 years. There are no pipes and no vacuum anywhere.
      1. +1
        16 November 2020 20: 15
        Just google the name of the train on the picture. The SUMA550-01 is a maglev train. Technology will soon hit 40 years.
        It remains for you to answer, what does Maglev have to do with it. Answer yourself, first of all.
        1. -1
          16 November 2020 22: 03
          Quote: abrakadabre
          It remains for you to answer, what does Maglev have to do with it. Answer yourself, first of all.

          In the sense of "where"?
          In the photo in the article - a wagon on a magnetic cushion. If in doubt, it has a name on it - SUMA550-01.
          Anyone who has not been banned from Google can find and read that it is a Maglev.
          There is a video of him driving outdoors.
          The author is talking about some kind of vacuum systems such as Hyperloop.
          Here they have something to do with it?
          1. 0
            17 November 2020 07: 45
            Anyone who has not been banned from Google can find and read that it is a Maglev.
            Anyone who has not been banned from school since the first grade (the period of studying letters) will read the description of the discussed prototype of the transport: a carriage moving on a magnetic cushion inside a tube where a vacuum is created. And what was added in the illustration for lack of a photo of the prototype under discussion, the tenth thing.
            Or did you grow up on comics and are not able to master the text longer than the interjections from the lips of their heroes? I really hope not, and I believe that you have mastered the text of the article.
            The author is talking about some kind of vacuum systems such as Hyperloop.
            Here they have something to do with it?
            We are still on a site where articles with illustrations are published, and not pictures with short captions, such as Instagram or Pinterest.
            1. -1
              17 November 2020 10: 16
              Quote: abrakadabre
              Anyone who has not been banned from school since the first grade (the period of studying letters) will read the description of the discussed prototype of the transport: a carriage moving on a magnetic cushion inside a tube where a vacuum is created. And what was added in the illustration for lack of a photo of the prototype under discussion, the tenth thing.
              Or did you grow up on comics and are not able to master the text longer than the interjections from the lips of their heroes? I really hope not, and I believe that you have mastered the text of the article.

              I read the text, yes. But the only clue for finding a specific train model, which is mentioned there, is the name in the photo.
              And yes, I'm used to the fact that the illustrations in the article correspond to the text, otherwise it's hack.
              1. 0
                17 November 2020 10: 30
                I'm used to the fact that the illustrations in the article correspond to the text, otherwise it's hack.
                Certainly. But in the absence of an ideal, the text is still primary.
  11. +8
    16 November 2020 10: 21
    The principle of such a vehicle, called Hyperloop, was developed in 2012 by Elon Musk. It is based on the movement of capsules through tunnels through an airless environment using magnetic levitation. This allows you to reach significant speeds, and the vehicle moves silently.

    Dear Maskophiles and parishioners of the Church of St. Elon, Vacuum Train or Vactrain - proposed in 1909. And not just vacuum, but also with magnetic levitation.

    Alfred Eli Beach demonstrated a model of a basic pneumatic subway system, in which air pressure in a tube pushed carriages, at the American Institute Exhibition in New York in 1867. Even the English-speaking aunt Vick in the description of Bichevsky's "Beach Pneumatic Transit" writes that the Musk's Hyperloop "does not fully implement" the development of Alfred Eli Beach. Those. the principle is over 150 years old. One hundred and fifty !!!
    The idea of ​​a vacuum train was first publicly expressed in 1909 in a Scientific American article citing an unnamed reader. The reader suggested organizing movement of cars in a vacuum tube based on magnetic levitation. According to his calculations, the path from New York to Philadelphia (136 km) would take in this case 6 minutes 44 s, and the distance from New York to Boston (305 km) could be covered in 10 minutes 4 s. Subsequently, the unnamed reader became known as the American astronautics pioneer Robert Goddard. After the death of the inventor in 1945, prototypes of a vacuum train were found in his papers, moving at an average speed of 1 miles per hour (000 km / h). At the same time, the widow of the inventor Esther Christine Goddard applied for patents US 1 A "Vacuum tube transportation system" and US 600 A "Apparatus for vacuum tube transportation".
    Here are the links:
    https://patents.google.com/patent/US2511979A/en
    https://patents.google.com/patent/US2488287A/en
    And there was also the first practical experience of the Russian professor Boris Weinberg in 1911-1913, which resembles the Weinberg system, the application of the German Hermann Kemper in 1934. In its number - DE 643316C
    Here is the link: https://patents.google.com/patent/DE643316C
    In Russian, the name is approximately the following "Suspended railway with wheelless vehicles that move on iron rails using magnetic fields"
    In this regard, the question is - what new principle was invented by Ilon Reeve Errolovich Musk? After all, if the old principle is not forgotten, then it cannot be reinvented. It can be used.
    1. -2
      16 November 2020 10: 26
      The Mask has a farm vacuum and air cushion
      1. +5
        16 November 2020 10: 42
        Quote: BlackMokona
        The Mask has a farm vacuum and air cushion

        Farm vacuum?
        This is definitely not a mistake? If not, please explain the meaning of the term.
        If there is a typo, what word did you mean?
        1. -1
          16 November 2020 11: 09
          A small typo, that's right.
          forevacuum, namely a pressure of 100 Pa (this is 1/1000 of atmospheric pressure) -
    2. -3
      16 November 2020 10: 42
      Quote: Shuttle
      Alfred Eli Beach demonstrated a model of a basic pneumatic subway system in which air pressure in a tube pushed carriages at the American Institute Exhibition in New York in 1867


      In Hyperloop, air pushes nothing: "The capsule must be driven by a linear electric motor."
      1. +6
        16 November 2020 11: 00
        Quote: Eye of the Crying
        In Hyperloop, air pushes nothing: "The capsule must be driven by a linear electric motor."

        Beech's idea in 1867 is just the background.
        Read about Goddard's idea, announced in 1909.
        1. -4
          16 November 2020 11: 02
          Quote: Shuttle
          Beech's idea in 1867 is just the background.



          But you said that it was Beach who put forward the "principle." And its principle (a train with pneumatic movement) has nothing to do with Hyperloop (a train in a vacuum with electric movement).
          1. +3
            16 November 2020 11: 16
            Quote: Eye of the Crying
            Quote: Shuttle
            Beech's idea in 1867 is just the background.


            But you said that it was Beach who put forward the "principle." And its principle (a train with pneumatic movement) has nothing to do with Hyperloop (a train in a vacuum with electric movement).

            You are making a false statement as if I were making it. However, he did not say this, and did not write.
            Reread my first post. It is clearly written there.
            1. -4
              16 November 2020 11: 17
              Quote: Shuttle
              Quote: Eye of the Crying
              But you said that it was Beach who put forward the "principle." And its principle (a train with pneumatic movement) has nothing to do with Hyperloop (a train in a vacuum with electric movement).


              You are putting forward a false statement, I did not say that or write.


              Here's what you wrote about the Beach train: "Ie the principle is over 150 years old. One hundred and fifty !!!".
    3. +3
      16 November 2020 10: 55
      Musk embodies ideas that were in science fiction books or in the form of patents.
      many years ago.
      Implements in the form of budgetary serial designs. Not a single copy
      from the Museum of Technology.
      1. +3
        16 November 2020 11: 20
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Musk embodies ideas that were in science fiction books or in the form of patents.
        many years ago.
        Implements in the form of budgetary serial designs. Not a single copy
        from the Museum of Technology.

        Yes, that's right. And it is for this that he is worthy of respect. But the article says that he is his company invented the principle... And this is a lie.
      2. +1
        16 November 2020 11: 38
        Alexey, not Musk, but the money behind him! And, if you wish, you can challenge the legitimacy of the creation of this or that "masquerade", because patents for its "innovations" often belong not even to the Yankees! Oh, this is a violation of copyright and patent rights!
        1. +2
          16 November 2020 16: 46
          Nobody is behind him. Neither state budgets nor mysterious private funds.
          He made money himself by taking incredible risks. Constantly on the brink of ruin.
          But his companies - one by one - are slowly but surely becoming profitable.
          All his projects are being implemented: some slowly, others quickly.
          In Australia, after the phenomenal success of the "solar-powered lithium-powered city", a second city - a larger one - ordered the same.
          One after another, European automakers are curtailing the production of cars with internal combustion engines. Tesla ICE "killed on the spot".
    4. 0
      16 November 2020 15: 43
      Musk only reworked the ideas and gave them a new sauce. There was a lot there, including the ideas of Soviet designers, which Musk issued as original, but in the use of which they found drawbacks associated with safety or imperfection of the technologies available at that time. How long will Musk's problems be resolved is still a question. This advertising genius may have decided to experiment immediately on people and preferably for their money.
  12. 0
    16 November 2020 10: 23
    Damn, the author has no ear or snout in what he writes about. Which vacuum train, which Hyperloop?
    Not enough sober just to google the name of the train from the photo?
    This is an ordinary maglev:
    1. +7
      16 November 2020 10: 35
      Rather, the author simply did not find a photo of this miracle, and simply attached what was lol
  13. -3
    16 November 2020 10: 36
    In addition to freight traffic, this thing will not work anywhere - the risks are too great for passengers .. And this news is not for our country at all. ... High-speed trains were the first in Japan to appear, God knows in what 70s of the last century, in my opinion .. And our climate is not the same, and the technology is not the same ..))
    1. -3
      16 November 2020 10: 46
      Quote: Dikson
      And our climate is not the same

      Yes, it's cold here. We have to provide railway workers with fur coats, and storage of fur coats requires separate premises and is associated with high costs laughing
      1. -2
        16 November 2020 15: 07
        Yeah yeah ... and some cunning friend digs a hole for the sake of interest in the pipe .., or the permafrost under the pipe will melt by accident .. And so much money is stolen for the construction of such a highway that it will simply never be completed))) And you minus, minus ..)
  14. +1
    16 November 2020 10: 38
    A vacuum train with a speed of over 1000 km / h was planned in the Third Reich. So the project was 80 years old and it was not implemented because the aviation did the same.
  15. +8
    16 November 2020 10: 41
    Old Soviet invention smile
    Train Moscow-Vladivostok, Deep Way, N. Trublaini.
    1. +8
      16 November 2020 11: 19
      The first idea of ​​a vacuum train on a magnetic levitation in its modern form was formulated by the famous American scientist Robert Goddard back in 1906.

      Drawing from Scientific American magazine with an article by Goddard.
      The world's first experiments with the movement of a body in a vacuum tube due to an electromagnetic field were staged in 1911-1913 at the Tomsk Technological Institute by the Russian professor Boris Veinberg.
      His public lecture "Movement without friction", delivered in St. Petersburg on March 31, 1914, can be found at http://veinberg.o7.ru/vactrain/
      1. +2
        16 November 2020 11: 40
        In the "Deep Path" it was steeper - there trains self-propelled almost without an engine from Moscow to Vladivostok moved due to the fact that the pipe went straight, first accelerated downhill, and then went up the hill by inertia. smile
        1. +2
          16 November 2020 11: 45
          Lem's The Magellanic Cloud (1955) is even cooler. There is an intercontinental train.
          1. +3
            16 November 2020 11: 58
            Here between parts of the world. Europe Asia.
            1941 year.
            Trublaini also has a new type of weapon - combat lithostats.
  16. +6
    16 November 2020 10: 46
    Comments of local "experts":
    This type of transport will be much more expensive than planes, and therefore not very promising. Service and safety are also in question
    He is generally hopeless.
    People with "big wallets" are very sensitive to issues related to their health, and breathing a vacuum is very problematic.
    Meanwhile, people with big wallets are building the world's first track for a 150-kilometer bullet train system linking Abu Dhabi and Dubai.
    Sheikhs believe that the economy cannot hold on to the export of hydrocarbons alone and it is necessary to intensively introduce modern technologies.
    1. +2
      16 November 2020 11: 04
      Sheikhs are generally strange. And there are well-grounded doubts about the economic efficiency of Hyperloop.
      1. +4
        16 November 2020 11: 11
        Quote: Eye of the Crying
        And there are well-grounded doubts about the economic efficiency of Hyperloop.

        It's okay, all childhood diseases will be eliminated.
        By the way, the Chinese are launching taxi drones next year Yes
        1. +1
          16 November 2020 23: 01
          "This is not our way." (C) We have "newcomers".
      2. +8
        16 November 2020 11: 31
        Sheikhs are generally strange. And there are well-grounded doubts about the economic efficiency of Hyperloop.
        Are the Chinese strange? And the Indians?

        There are already about a dozen companies in the world engaged in such developments.
        1. +1
          16 November 2020 11: 34
          The Chinese are weird in the same respect as the sheikhs - technology for show-off.

          And the fact that a dozen companies are engaged in developments does not guarantee the economic efficiency of Hyperloop.
          1. +4
            16 November 2020 11: 40
            Clear. You have everything according to the classics, as Mikhalkov described.
            1. 0
              16 November 2020 11: 42
              I don’t remember that Mikhalkov wrote about Hyperloop, but I believe you.
              1. +3
                16 November 2020 11: 46
                Mikhalkov did not write about hyperloop. He wrote about doubts.
        2. +2
          16 November 2020 23: 02
          Viktor hi,
          they do not have Siberia - there is nowhere to "suck" - they have to think and work with their heads.
      3. 0
        16 November 2020 12: 24
        There are undoubtedly doubts.
        But many businessmen, including domestic ones, give money to the project.

        https://www.interfax.ru/business/481705
        Co-owner of PIK Group invested $ 10 million in Hyperloop startup

        https://vc.ru/finance/91432-predstaviteli-rfpi-i-caspian-vc-ziyavudina-magomedova-pokinuli-sovet-direktorov-virgin-hyperloop-one
        Representatives of RDIF and Caspian VC Ziyavudin Magomedov leave the board of directors of Virgin Hyperloop One
        In 2015-2017, Caspian VC invested over $ 100 million in the company, becoming one of the largest investors.

        Hyperloop is being built as a serious business. It is a fact
        1. +2
          16 November 2020 13: 24
          They say that 9 out of 10 projects in which venture capitalists invest, burn out.
          1. +2
            16 November 2020 14: 44
            these are statistics for startups in general
            According to the Startup Genome Report, 92% of startups die

            If a venture fund invests $ 100 million, and at a later stage, this can serve as an indicator of the relative maturity of the project.
            Although there are undoubtedly risks
            1. +1
              16 November 2020 14: 57
              Judging by the fact that they have left the board of directors, they probably suspect something.

              Quote: Engineer
              invests $ 100 million, and at later stages,


              From what you quoted, the investment was made in 2015-2017, 1-3 years after the company was founded. I think it was still an early stage.
              1. +1
                16 November 2020 15: 56
                Acquired in 2016 when the company went public (available on Wikipedia) - not an early stage anymore. I read the point of view that once you have placed your shares in a public auction, you are no longer a startup.

                Judging by the fact that they have left the board of directors, they probably suspect something.


                When something is suspected, assets are thrown off.
                Once again, I do not argue that the element of risk is still present.
                1. 0
                  16 November 2020 16: 38
                  Quote: Engineer
                  Acquired in 2016 when the company went public (available on Wikipedia)


                  It is written above that in 2015, and Virgin Hyperloop itself is listed as private in Wikipedia.

                  Quote: Engineer
                  When something is suspected, assets are thrown off.


                  They refused to comment on this, so everyone can take it as he wants.
                  1. +1
                    16 November 2020 16: 56
                    Of course, private is private. not closed - closed
                    As of January 2015 - 9 million from Sherpa
                    As of December 2015 - 37 million in total.
                    From this, it is clear that at the startup stage, the inflows are small, as befits a startup.
                    The main investments, including from Russian investors, came after entering the IPO. As it should be
                    What can you argue about, I don't understand.
                    They refused to comment on this, so everyone can take it as he wants.

                    Undoubtedly
                    1. +1
                      16 November 2020 17: 31
                      An IPO is going public, isn't it? Private companies can issue shares, but an IPO makes the company public.
                      1. +1
                        16 November 2020 18: 55
                        Good point.
                        The first big money - 80 million was received not through an IPO, but a series of B round funding. Your post made me remember the difference. There really is no public offering of shares on the stock exchange.
                        In any case, round B funding is also the next level of business, not an early stage.
    2. +3
      16 November 2020 11: 04
      Some of the local "experts - hamsters" have already managed to minus. I immediately remember the last phrase of Svirid Petrovich Golokhvastov in the comedy "After Two Hares".
      1. +2
        16 November 2020 23: 05
        "Chasing two hares" fully explains the "urya-patriotic ass in half." bully
  17. +3
    16 November 2020 10: 54
    It will accelerate for 10 minutes, slow down for 10 minutes and Korea will end.
  18. KCA
    +1
    16 November 2020 11: 08
    We also built an experimental monorail in Moscow time, and that's it, they counted, they shed a tear, it, of course, does not run 1000 km / h, but on the contrary, it barely crawls, because it is used for tourist purposes, as a vehicle is inconvenient, the interval is very large, the metro will go out much faster, so this monorail, engineers will have fun, then businessmen and economists will come and say - well, it's there
    1. +1
      16 November 2020 11: 19
      At one time in the Russian Academy of Sciences they said that reusable rocket stages are expensive and unpromising - but in reality everything turned out differently with this train it will be the same.
      1. KCA
        +1
        16 November 2020 12: 19
        However, projects of various reusable launch vehicles were developed in the USSR, and in the Russian Federation too.
        The construction of any hyperloops will cost as the construction of a cosmodrome with a dozen launch sites, and their maximum use is a non-stop way from the city to the airport, 20 kilometers.
        1. 0
          16 November 2020 14: 31
          Developed - just not implemented in practice, and so far there is not a single reusable stage or ship. These guiding hermotunnels can be manufactured on large 3D printers from the same composite powder materials as the bodies and parts of such trains in case of depressurization of the cars, they can be equipped with additional compressed air balloons to equalize the pressure in emergency situations - the only problem for these trains is the energy consumption to create vacuum along the entire length of the tunnel.
          1. 0
            16 November 2020 20: 45
            in case of depressurization of the cars, they can be equipped with additional compressed air bolons to equalize the pressure in emergency situations
            Their main problem from the point of view of safety is not the depressurization of the car, but the depressurization of the pipe.
            1. 0
              16 November 2020 22: 12
              This problem is solved by more durable materials, the tunnel does not collapse.
              1. 0
                17 November 2020 07: 55
                This problem is solved by more durable materials, the tunnel does not collapse.
                Thank you, you reassured me. At least in one question: do not hire go ... comrades, that is, engineers who are unable to calculate the strength of the pipe. True, there is still a list of questions for a couple of pages in small print. Both in the technical part and the economic part arising from it. Well, okay, on the main issue you reassured me.
  19. 0
    16 November 2020 11: 09
    As soon as possible ...
    And so, like any high-speed transport, it is a dangerous thing ... well, there are always enough people for the adrenaline rush.
  20. +1
    16 November 2020 11: 33
    In Soviet times, in the magazines Tekhnika-Molodezhi and Yuniy Tekhnik, similar projects were massively described and discussed! Stop making an icon out of a successful businessman!
    1. +2
      16 November 2020 11: 56
      You catch the difference between "discussed" and "implemented"? We are discussing a lot of things, what about the implementation ...
  21. 0
    16 November 2020 12: 00
    By the way.
    They mentioned pipelines, why not use them?
    There is a pipe, big and strong. Well, not a vacuum, but a pressure drop, the same version from the century before last.
    Of course, a train for 100 people is unlikely to reach the speed of sound, but not necessarily all at once.
  22. 0
    16 November 2020 12: 01
    This pipe will spit out someone with terrible force ...
  23. -4
    16 November 2020 12: 23
    Hyperloop will not take off - any hole in the train body under vacuum conditions means certain death of passengers from decompression. In addition, the residual air pressure is too low to create an air cushion to support the train instead of the wheels.

    In the absence of high-temperature superconducting magnets, the real solution is to let the train pass through a pipe with atmospheric pressure, pump out air with a head fan, then use it to create an air cushion and release it in the tail of the train. The movement along the pipe is driven by a linear electric motor. The speed will be reduced to 800-900 km / h, but passengers will be guaranteed to be protected from decompression.

    PS The Korean and Maskov projects are akin to the Chinese magnetic levitation train operated on the line between the capital's international airport and Beijing worth over $ 1 billion, which will pay off in a hundred years (like, so that foreign hamsters get jealous) laughing
  24. 0
    16 November 2020 13: 59
    Train to Busan)) Only fast laughing
  25. 0
    16 November 2020 14: 50
    Hyperloop is not needed by anyone except to show off.
    If there is an accident, fire, depressurization of the train in the pipe - try to get out ...
    Trains, planes ..., helicopters ..., buses with trolleybuses ... what else do you need - in terms of collective transport?
    And as a result of Asian epidemics and the development of "information technologies", we may generally refrain from traveling or prefer personal transport - hello to Liksutov and Sobyanin. laughing However, they provided themselves for their old age - at the expense of Muscovites - and they themselves do not take the subway. So - hello to Muscovites. sad As well as residents of some other Russian cities, where the authorities are struggling with personal transport with a tenacity worthy of much better use.
    And in general, initially a completely different was called a hyperloop, as I understand it - something ring-shaped phantasmogoric for launching into space. There it is clear why the "loop". And where does the "loop" have to do with it? Musk just borrowed a nice word.
  26. +1
    16 November 2020 16: 40
    Quote: KCA
    What are these outskirts? I live at the farthest point Moscow time region, a simple train is slow 2:57, express 2:20

    These are territories not included in the Moscow region. I live in Murmansk, 20 minutes to work. on foot. Nakoy there electric trains and walk around. Murmansk-Moscow 2.5 days no desire to drive?
  27. 0
    16 November 2020 17: 15
    Quote: Stroporez
    China offered to build cheaper with infrastructure, for themselves they are doing great construction.

    You never know what China offers, everything is decided by the conditions, where are they?
    1) How much will it build?
    2) How long is the service life?
    3) Will it withstand a magnitude 9 earthquake?
    4) Will the ride be free?
    5) Who will own the bridge?

    After all, China offered to build a railway, but when they figured out the conditions, they realized that it would be suitable only for Ukraine or another colony.
  28. 0
    16 November 2020 17: 42
    From the category: "I believe in the bright future of the city of Udoev"
  29. 0
    16 November 2020 18: 02
    Quote: Vadim237
    In Russia, construction is more difficult than in China, including due to climatic factors and soil characteristics.

    Yeah, especially in the south of Russia. It is difficult to build, because "friends" are building at exorbitant prices! You look at similar projects - either the amount is several times less, or for such a sum the bridge is several times longer hi
  30. 0
    16 November 2020 18: 10
    Quote: Scoun
    With our distances we really have to regret. Personally, I am not aware of the domestic work in this direction.

    Given our distances, building such a project is a DURDOM. Do you propose to punch a tunnel to Vladivostok, or to lay a sickly pipe?
    If something is to build a high-speed metro in a big city. hi
  31. +2
    16 November 2020 19: 30
    Quote: Temples
    What a life you have if you only have to regret ... crying
    And regret that Russian Railways does not build what you calculated in the note on VO.

    I rarely agree with the comrade "Stroporez", but in this case I agree. Alas and ah. There is nothing even remotely similar in Russia, not even close. But still almost in the 80s, when the ER-200 was launched between Moscow and Leningrad, there was a lot of talk about the need to develop high-speed ground transport in the USSR. And they planned to launch at least FOUR of such directions. From Moscow to the South (to Rostov, and in the future to Vladikavkaz (Ordzhonikidze), from Moscow to Ukraine (to Kiev), From Moscow to the Baltic states and from Moscow to the Volga region. As far as I know, only ER-200 was operated on the Moscow-Leningrad route, and in the Volga region the train ran with speed limits, and the rest was not even designed.
    And sometimes it was offensive. Around the same years, the Nauka publishing house published the book Urban Transport of the Future. Of course, such a vacuum train was not there, but the variants of vehicles and their experimental operation were described. And sometimes it was sad to read that somewhere at the exhibition we had a self-propelled sidewalk a hundred meters long and a monorail.
    But such transport, even though it is expensive for the vastness of Russia, is the very thing. But alas, we do not have any land transport faster than the Sapsan, and is not expected.

    Quote: zwlad
    Do we need such trains? I think not.
    The distances are not the same.

    Exactly, not those. It is better, of course, a week in a compartment carriage (or even in a reserved seat) to cut from Moscow to Vladivostok, and not do it in 7-8 hours. Faster than a plane. With comfort and regardless of the weather ...

    Quote: Antidote
    If I don't need it, then no one needs it!
    After all, it’s not on the couch, from the capital to the outskirts in 6 hours, you need, as grandfathers bequeathed, a week in a reserved seat, with bears and gypsies.

    Yes, the Gypsies - it is unacceptable, and a few more bottles of vodka and a couple of loaves of "Doctor's" sausage

    Quote: Alexander Vorontsov
    Too many people go from the Moscow region to Moscow to work.
    There are electric trains, and they are excellent. A swallow, for example, reaches the center of Moscow from Zelenograd in 30 minutes.
    It is generally unrealistic to leave Balashikha - the whole expensive is one continuous traffic jam.
    Expanding expensive ones is ineffective and in most cases it is simply impossible due to the fact that you will have to demolish everything that is built nearby.

    At the same time, now the difference between travel by train and a car can be 1 hour, but this is not enough to outweigh the advantages of "personal space".
    But if the time is not 30 minutes, but 10 or 6 minutes, the situation can change radically.

    Even with current speeds, rail transport is becoming more profitable. In 2010 he was on a business trip to Moscow. It so happened that on Saturday I had to return. The comrade spent almost 5 hours on the movement of the "hotel-metro Yugo West" - a minibus to Vnukovo because of the continuous traffic jam (it was good at least the airplane was in the evening). I was advised to take the Aeroexpress train from Kievsky railway station. The specified time, if I am not mistaken, is either 36 or 46 minutes by the Aeroexpress to the nearest minute. The only difference was that on a minibus it cost, for example, 30 rubles, and on an Aeroexpress - 100.

    Quote: svp67
    Yes?????? Ailon Musk seems to have read SOVIET FANTASY well ...

    Sergei! Not only the Arctic Bridge. If my sclerosis does not change me, then in the book "Gayanea" the so-called. "SHAREX". Ball express. The canvas is a concrete half-pipe in which such an assembly moves on the balls ... In short, you can find a lot of things

    Quote: sergo1914
    But we must re-lay the railway

    And make them as straight as possible, or with a very large turning radius. On modern ones, it's not that this vacuum will not pass, but the same "Sapsan" will go at the speed of an ordinary train
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. +1
    17 November 2020 09: 36
    For some reason I remembered how in Argentina they built a high-speed train "Tren Bala" - a bullet train, the money took the train, they were not built. The funny thing is that there are no simple trains either, all the rails have rotted ...

    And I also remembered how the cosmodrome was built in Argentina, "in 40 minutes to anywhere in the country on a spaceship" they promised. The cosmodrome was not built, but the country got into debt head over heels, then the banks took all the money from people to pay off the debt. Then the horse militia chased people with clubs, it was fun ... wassat

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"