Garrisons from which Russian equipment was delivered to Karabakh: logistics of a peacekeeping mission

85

In recent days, Russian equipment arriving in Nagorno-Karabakh has constantly appeared in the military reports of the Ministry of Defense and in journalistic materials. Its crews are tasked with ensuring security in the region.

The core of the contingent was the 15th separate peacekeeping brigade (the only one in the RF Armed Forces of this profile), the personnel and materiel of which are delivered from the Samara region, where it is deployed, to the Erebuni airbase. From here, the troops are already on their way to a new duty station.



At the same time, users found that some types of equipment were "not typical" for the 15th Omsb Brigade. Therefore, the question arose of how to distinguish from which garrisons the "materiel" is arriving.

Corresponding explanations of the specific "garrison" logistics of the peacekeeping mission in Nagorno-Karabakh began to appear. The vehicles of the 15th brigade proper have license plates with 76 in the code field.

This is due to the fact that it is assigned to a connection located in the Samara region. At the same time, this subject of the Russian Federation was previously part of the Volga-Ural Military District, the code of which was the number 76 (not to be confused with civilian numbers, where 76 is the Yaroslavl Region), now belongs to the Central Military District.

The equipment, which has numbers 94 in the same field, was delivered to Karabakh from the 102nd military base located in Gyumri. This code refers to the grouping of Russian troops in the Transcaucasus.

In addition, the equipment of the peacekeeping unit proper should be marked with the “MC” sign, applied in white or yellow colors on a blue background, which was done in accordance with the relevant standards.


Earlier it was noted that the Russian peacekeepers are armed with the latest AK-12 assault rifles. This was reported by "Voennoye Obozreniye" in one of its materials on November 15. Recall that in addition to ground equipment, the peacekeeping mission is also provided with the means aviation: Mi-8 and Mi-24 helicopters, as well as drones to monitor the situation.
  • Russian Defense Ministry website
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    16 November 2020 07: 34
    For me, it doesn't matter where the equipment comes from, the main thing is that the peacekeepers have the equipment! And the curious Varvara's nose was ripped off at the bazaar - this is for those who want to receive information too "in depth" that may not be subject to publication!
    1. -30
      16 November 2020 07: 43
      Although Varvara from the bazaar was left without a nose, all the same, some outlines are drawn. So judging by the video posted by "satellite armenia", there are Grads. Although nothing is written about hail in the tripartite document.
      1. 0
        16 November 2020 07: 56
        Grads, air defense and electronic warfare are needed so that there are no provocations from the Azeri and Turks.
        1. -3
          16 November 2020 08: 25
          it is a peacekeeping force. they are not entitled to such a technique due to their status and contracts. except for electronic warfare.
      2. +18
        16 November 2020 08: 03
        this is a "special technique", it is written about it
      3. +4
        16 November 2020 12: 30
        Quote: Bilal
        So judging by the video posted by "satellite armenia", there are Grads.

        About Grad - all nonsense. There were photos either from other places or the Grads were Armenian.
    2. -20
      16 November 2020 08: 49
      We are big people, we will help the fraternal Armenian people to defend the remnants of fraternal Karabakh)))
    3. +5
      16 November 2020 11: 23
      Quote: Thrifty
      For me, it doesn't matter where the technique comes from

      And it doesn't matter to me at all where the MS contingent comes from ... much more important is the REAL LOGISTIC "question" -... "how" and "how long .."?
      Indeed, in essence, this is a full-fledged trap placement. recourse .... if Khmeimim still ... here and there (it is possible through Iraq-Iran, well, bypassing Europe), then in this case, how ... if suddenly Aliyev says .. "no" and Georgia is the same?
      After all, it is not for nothing that the "Americans" fuss with the opening of a base in Georgia with the introduction of a contingent of troops and ... the Turks are not "sleeping" (despite the statements of our Foreign Ministry and fellow -goods).
      On November 13, the Turkish parliament began drafting a resolution giving Ankara a legal basis to send units of the Turkish armed forces to Nagorno-Karabakh as part of a memorandum on the creation of a joint Russian-Turkish center to control the ceasefire between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is also preparing to sign this resolution, which will set out information about the location of the Turkish army in Nagorno-Karabakh and how it will act.
      The Turkish news agency Sabah reports.

      In essence, this means that Turkey is preparing to send its troops into the territory of Azerbaijan. Naturally, at the invitation of Baku, and for this they do not need at all ..... any third countries.
      So that's what you had to think about from the very beginning, and not "find out" which military equipment belongs to.
      1. +1
        16 November 2020 12: 33
        Quote: ancient
        what if Aliyev suddenly says "no" and Georgia is the same?

        Let them try. If they have at least the remnants of reason, then no one will anger Russia. Apparently they were told quite clearly how it could end. A concrete example is Georgia. It's hard to even imagine how Russophobic the country is, they shout loudly that they are in a state of war with Russia and on you, and an air corridor for the Russian military contingent was provided (think for the Russian military Karl) and sit silently like mice. It means that at a certain level, something happened that we do not know, but can guess.
        1. +3
          16 November 2020 16: 41
          Quote: orionvitt
          Let them try.

          Why should they be afraid? belay We will stand at attention and also .... "greet" ... unfortunately recourse
          Quote: orionvitt
          Apparently they were told quite clearly how it could end

          Who is it to them? ...... But they did not think that Turkey, having got into a state of armed conflict with Russia, has the right to block straits and close its airspace, which immediately puts the groupings of Russian forces in Syria and Libya in a disastrous situation, as Erdogan says - "..we are one people, one army, one faith ...".
          And then what do you order to do ... puff out your cheeks again?
          Quote: orionvitt
          both on you, and the air corridor for the Russian military contingent was provided (think, for the Russian military Karl)

          Have you ever thought that this "permission", the so-called, looks more like ... a banal WEST? bully
          And then what will you deign to do? I, for example, have no idea at all ...... why "climbed" I understand ... but it's called "trishkin caftan" ... unfortunately. soldier
          1. +1
            16 November 2020 17: 15
            ancient "And then what do you want to do ... puff out your cheeks again?"
            Do you mean a small conflict or a full-fledged war?
            If the war, then our Georgia will pass just in transit))) And in figs there are different opinions and so on. It will be harder with Syria. But through Iran and northern Iraq, it will be possible to establish supplies. There will depend on Iran a lot, he controls those lands. Everything is complicated there.)))
            1. +1
              16 November 2020 17: 27
              Quote: Nagaibak
              Do you mean a small conflict or a full-fledged war?

              I, in a seemingly understandable language, wrote - ".... Turkey, having got into a state of armed conflict with Russia", well, what would be clearer - the example with the country 404 -....... and that's it ... do what you want and you don't violate any international norms, although who cares about them now ... these .. "norms" wassat
              Quote: Nagaibak
              If the war, then our Georgia will pass just in transit)

              Yeah ..... "with a running start" ... with the current VGK wassat
              1. -1
                16 November 2020 18: 17
                the ancient "" .... Turkey, having fallen into a state of armed conflict with Russia "
                An armed conflict is not a full-fledged war. We shot and dispersed. A full-fledged war is when Turkey attacks Armenia with most of its armed forces. And ours will be forced to enter the war. There will be no time for sentimentality.
                ancient "Aha ....." with a running start "... with the current VGK"
                Well, there weren't too many full-scale wars. So there were armed conflicts as you say.))) For those conflicts that were, Putin's half-measures were probably in the subject.))) Who knows.)))
                1. +2
                  16 November 2020 18: 34
                  Quote: Nagaibak
                  Armed conflict is not a full-fledged war

                  Don't understand or principles fellow -patriotism is not allowed to think soberly?
                  Last time I repeat ..... what is needed is not a FACT, but a REASON !!!
                  1. +2
                    16 November 2020 18: 58
                    ancient "Do not you understand or the principles of patriotism do not allow to think soberly?"
                    I did not accuse you of anything.))) They dragged patriotism.))) If you cannot communicate, let's not. Why hysteria then?)))
                    ancient "Last time I repeat ..... what is needed is not a FACT, but a REASON !!!"
                    Last time I don't need to repeat it.))) You wrote nonsense about the trap.))) Maybe we are talking about different things? Or are you unable to understand what I wrote to you?)))
                  2. -2
                    17 November 2020 10: 51
                    Quote: ancient
                    patriotism is not allowed to think soberly?

                    Is this your sober thinking? laughing In general, your idea is clear, Katz suggests giving up.
          2. -1
            17 November 2020 10: 58
            Quote: ancient
            Who is it for them?

            Certainly not for you. laughing Because you have a very definite vision of the situation. I quote
            For example, I have no idea .... why they "climbed".
          3. -1
            20 November 2020 08: 21
            Quote: ancient
            And they did not think that Turkey, having got into a state of armed conflict with Russia, has the right to block the straits and close its airspace,

            In response, Putin issues a decree on the nationalization of all property of Turkey and Turkish citizens on the territory of the Russian Federation ... in a week ... if actions against the Russian Federation are not terminated !!!!
            I guarantee you that in three days a scarecrow (very carefully and well made !!!) of Erdogan will hang on the central square of Istanbul
        2. 0
          16 November 2020 17: 08
          And then there is no need to think too much: If Russia does not receive corridors for a peacekeeping operation, then our missiles will not need corridors, especially if there is a no-fly zone over the entire territory of Georges.
          1. +7
            16 November 2020 17: 29
            Quote: hydrox
            If Russia does not receive corridors for conducting a peacekeeping operation, then our missiles will not need corridors,

            Yeah ..... missiles yes to NATO countries ..... wassat ... fellow -patriotism ... hit in the head lol
            How many "rackets" did you launch at the pan-heads when they were destroying Lonetsk and Lugansk?
            That's it ...
            1. -1
              17 November 2020 07: 50
              When they destroyed Donetsk, there was a civil war in Ukraine and Russia could not get involved without entering WW3, but since then a lot of water has flowed under the bridge - well, you still don't understand, "putriots" ...
              And not to see the difference between a peacekeeping operation and a civil war - this is a big thorn in the eye. laughing
              And then: Debaltseve and Ilovaisk should be considered the merit of ONLY the militia - it generally needs to be eyeless - with which I congratulate you.
        3. +18
          16 November 2020 23: 00
          Quote: orionvitt
          Quote: ancient
          what if Aliyev suddenly says "no" and Georgia is the same?

          Let them try. If they have at least the remnants of reason, then no one will anger Russia. Apparently they were told quite clearly how it could end.

          What? -Nothing. Remember the tomatoes?
          Brzezinski has already spoken out on this issue once.
          Georgia wants to open or close the corridor and the fact that it opened it is not a fear of Russia, but a desire to end the war nearby
          1. 0
            17 November 2020 07: 57
            Quote: Overlock
            this is not a fear of Russia, but a desire to end the war nearby

            You are right, this is not a fear of Russia, this is a fear of Georgia that bombers might pass in front of the transport workers - the interest in the corridor was "public" and needed by everyone
  2. +7
    16 November 2020 08: 19
    This is due to the fact that it is assigned to a connection located in the Samara region. At the same time, this subject of the Russian Federation was previously part of the Volga-Ural Military District, the code of which was the number 76 (not to be confused with civilian numbers, where 76 is the Yaroslavl Region).
    What an inaccurate information. "76" is now a vehicle of the Central Military District of the RF Ministry of Defense
    1. +2
      16 November 2020 08: 29
      already 10 years ago)))
  3. +2
    16 November 2020 08: 28
    The technique IS! I think this is the main thing. And as for the "Grad" in the columns of peacekeepers - their appearance is illogical. Such systems require shells - wagons, and who will need to be suppressed with massive fire?
    1. -2
      17 November 2020 08: 34
      The situation was such that the impact of single shells might have been more psychological than destructive: this is forcing the Armenians to liberate the Azeri lands seized by the Armenians in the previous war: Armenians consider such suicides "heroes of Armenia", although it is more correct to consider them as provocateurs inciting Azeris to resume wars - then Russians will die (there are ten times less of ours there) - but do we need it? Then it will be easier for us to retreat - and let the Turks repeat 1915!
      In this situation, there will be no surviving Armenians ...
  4. Hog
    -9
    16 November 2020 08: 31
    It would be better to talk about the BTR-60, which lit up there (the latest technology, after all).
    1. +1
      16 November 2020 08: 33
      in the singular?)))
      1. Hog
        -8
        16 November 2020 08: 40
        The essence of this does not change.
        1. +4
          16 November 2020 09: 14
          in general, it is cardinal))) as I understand it, the service is not very familiar to you. he was removed from service not just long ago but very much. even before the nineties. but the Armenian army has modernized armored personnel carriers 70)
          1. +2
            16 November 2020 15: 43
            Quote: carstorm 11
            in general, it is cardinal))) as I understand it, the service is not very familiar to you. he was removed from service not just long ago but very much. even before the nineties. but the Armenian army has modernized armored personnel carriers 70)

            The BTR-60 was also in service in the 90s. As I understand it, the service is not very familiar to you laughing
            1. +3
              16 November 2020 15: 49
              you know, I went to school in the late nineties. then 15 years of service. and I never met a single 60. in the hole itself, even supposedly Amur parts) and even 50 armored personnel carriers in my park were on conservation, like that in the Far East.
              1. +2
                16 November 2020 18: 33
                Quote: carstorm 11
                you know, I went to school in the late nineties. then 15 years of service. and I never met a single 60. in the hole itself, even supposedly Amur parts) and even 50 armored personnel carriers in my park were on conservation, like that in the Far East.

                And I'm 91 already quit. drinks It was about the fact that the BTR 60 was removed from service long before the 90s - then you got excited, you will agree. They were even in the GSVG until the end of the withdrawal, and this is already the mid-90s. About then I do not argue, although as a KSHM still can be somewhere. I didn't serve in the Far East, I don't know. My easternmost district was ZABVO. drinks
                1. +1
                  16 November 2020 18: 48
                  and that's a fact. 70-80 squeezed them out very quickly and massively. back in the eighties. not. they could have remained in storage somewhere. I still haven't been everywhere. but they were definitely not in service by states in the nineties) that there they were withdrawn from the GSVG, I no longer remember exactly. I think there was something in storage. t 62 removed from service too. but this does not deny the fact that they cost in the thousands and are sometimes even commissioned during exercises)
                  1. 0
                    18 November 2020 18: 50
                    Quote: carstorm 11
                    and that's a fact. 70-80 squeezed them out very quickly and massively. back in the eighties. not. they could have remained in storage somewhere. I still haven't been everywhere. but they were definitely not in service by states in the nineties) that there they were withdrawn from the GSVG, I no longer remember exactly. I think there was something in storage. t 62 removed from service too. but this does not deny the fact that they cost in the thousands and are sometimes even commissioned during exercises)

                    Back in the fall of 1989, I received an BTR-60 at the TRZ for the 39th Guards Division, there were infantry regiments on them. The army, thank God, was large, everywhere it was different drinks
          2. +1
            17 November 2020 16: 57
            - Not certainly in that way. In some parts of the KShM on the basis of "60" or "70" s were located until the late 90s - early 2000s .... I would not be surprised if they are still standing in parks of cropped units or at storage bases. !
    2. +6
      16 November 2020 09: 11
      And what was installed on it? Communication? Non-combat systems are constantly being put on older platforms. Here is the same age as the BTR-60 - the US Army ambulance M113, Poland, 2019. Although they have military systems on this platform, they are not sickly - they write about 5 thousand units.

      1. +2
        16 November 2020 10: 04
        Not okay . the last modernization steps of 60 so that we could throw the hulls for export were almost 20 years ago and everything died out. he has nowhere to come from. where to find his photo, but how can it not work?
      2. +2
        17 November 2020 13: 19
        Quote: Eugene-Eugene
        And what was installed on it? Communication? Non-combat systems are constantly being put on older platforms. Here is the same age as the BTR-60 - the US Army ambulance M113, Poland, 2019. Although they have military systems on this platform, they are not sickly - they write about 5 thousand units.

        Moreover, the Americans have long wanted to get rid of the M113 and machines based on it - but there is not enough money. As a result, they lasted until 2019 and limited themselves to replacing only at the brigade level:
        In January-February 2019, the US Army issued $ 873 million worth of contracts to BAE Systems for the production of a total of 457 AMPV vehicles of all five variants of the first production batch (the so-called LRIP stage - Low Rate Initial Production). The start of their deliveries was planned from March 2020, and in total 2020 AMPV vehicles were to be delivered during the 258 financial year, in order to equip them with the first two armored brigades, including for deployment in Europe. The completion of the LRIP stage was scheduled for 2022, with the transition to full-scale serial production.
        © bmpd
        BAE Systems must supply 5 types of AMPV ("reckless Bradley") and machines based on it:
        - General purpose armored personnel carrier М1283.
        - Medical evacuation vehicle М1284.
        - Mobile first-aid post М1285.
        - Command vehicle M1286.
        - Self-propelled mortar M1287.
        Moreover, 457 AMPV is only the first stage. In total, the brigades need to replace 2897 M113 armored personnel carriers and vehicles based on them.
        But there is still no money to replace 1993 vehicles based on the M113 armored personnel carrier used in units above the brigade level.
    3. +1
      16 November 2020 09: 16
      What's more important is what's inside it. There's a lot there. It will stand more
    4. +3
      16 November 2020 09: 41
      Quote: Hog
      It would be better to talk about the BTR-60, which lit up there (the latest technology, after all)

      So what? KShM-ki on their basis are still used.
      1. Hog
        +2
        16 November 2020 13: 07
        He is very similar to KShM


        1. +1
          17 November 2020 11: 33
          Either a KShM or an armored personnel carrier for the calculation of the ACS of an anti-aircraft missile battery of an air defense, which each motorized rifle brigade has.Air defense at the Eagle / Verb level will still be presented
  5. -11
    16 November 2020 08: 40
    Why would we even be there and send forces there? Karabakh Armenians profiled it is their problem, how are we there? Why do we need to substitute a small detachment of fighters in a hot spot, where we will have to intervene if something happens. For an alpine appendix?
    1. +9
      16 November 2020 08: 48
      Quote: Cool but not Igor
      Why should we expose a small detachment of fighters to a hot spot

      Keep watching
    2. +3
      16 November 2020 09: 42
      Quote: Cool but not Igor
      Why would we even be there and send forces there?

      Forgive me, but you have the Israel flag on your "nickname" and the question sounds at least ridiculous ...
      1. +1
        16 November 2020 12: 03
        What difference does it make where I am now? Or should I use vpn to log in through Russian servers just so that you don't have something to cling to? You better answer on the topic
      2. -4
        17 November 2020 14: 47
        Israel, like the United States, they care about everything in the world. They would have sat and defended their houses from the Palestinians, no, we must poke their heads here too!
  6. -8
    16 November 2020 08: 48
    Is it Russian equipment from the 102nd Russian base? But. request

    1. +13
      16 November 2020 09: 07
      Quote: professor
      Is it Russian equipment from the 102nd Russian base?

      If you want to say that all these hailstones and guns are ours, then you are wrong.

      Why are the abandoned vehicles filmed so that their numbers are not visible (like the UAZ in the photo)?

      I understand if they would eat in a column only incoming peacekeepers walked, then it would have been dust of revenge, otherwise it won't work.
      1. -4
        16 November 2020 11: 38
        Quote: Boris55
        If you want to say that all these hailstones and guns are ours, then you are wrong.

        I don’t want to and I don’t say.
        I was "killed" by a 1970s UAZ ...
        1. +1
          16 November 2020 17: 27
          professor "I was killed by a 1970s UAZ ..."
          Equipment was brought to Armenia from Georgian bases when troops were withdrawn from there. They were taken to Armenia. There should be enough old stuff. Who would change it there? And the UAZ still looks good if it was standing all the time and almost new, what's the difference?)))
          1. +3
            16 November 2020 19: 14
            Quote: Nagaibak
            professor "I was killed by a 1970s UAZ ..."
            Equipment was brought to Armenia from Georgian bases when troops were withdrawn from there. They were taken to Armenia. There should be enough old stuff. Who would change it there? And the UAZ still looks good if it was standing all the time and almost new, what's the difference?)))

            The lorries with the T-34 also look interesting. Only this is not a reconstruction of past years, but an area of ​​hostilities where there are a lot of inadequate weapons on both sides, and if you believe your officials, then there are militants from Syria (who have already been destroyed before?) Who are very soulless and dangerous. I'm at a loss...
            1. +1
              16 November 2020 19: 26
              professor "I'm at a loss .."
              So what? Didn't this UAZ reach Stepanakert? Was it blown up? Have they all been killed? What is the problem then?))) And that in Syria did not destroy the militants?))) About "everyone" in Russia, no one ever said. There are official numbers of those killed. the rest were taken to Idlib under Erdogan's wing. By the way, it is not a fact that this UAZ in Karabakh will remain, accompanying the convoy, and can return to the base. Regarding the old weapon .... I remember in the Crimea we had such a guy who served in the Marine Corps. He served in 2010-2011. So he had a grenade launcher according to his 1967 story.
              1. +3
                16 November 2020 19: 55
                Quote: Nagaibak
                So what? Didn't this UAZ reach Stepanakert? Was it blown up? Have they all been killed? What is the problem then?)))

                Have to wait to get killed?

                Quote: Nagaibak
                Why didn't they kill militants in Syria?)

                Destroyed or destroyed? Was the victory reported?

                Quote: Nagaibak
                Nobody ever spoke about "everyone" in Russia. There are official numbers of those killed. the rest were taken to Idlib under Erdogan's wing. It is not a fact by the way that this UAZ in Karabakh will remain, accompanying the convoy, and can return to the base. Regarding the old weapon .... I remember in the Crimea we had such a guy who served in the Marine Corps. He served in 2010-2011. So he had a grenade launcher according to his 1967 story.

                What are you doing?
                1. -1
                  16 November 2020 20: 40
                  professor "Should we wait to get killed?"
                  So this is just a car in order to accompany the convoy from point A to point B. In your UAZ patriot better than this?))) Give you an armored car. so they are there.)))
                  professor "Destroyed or destroyed? Was the victory reported?"
                  And destroyed and destroyed. Do you know the process.)))
                  "MOSCOW, August 22. / TASS /. The Russian military killed more than 86 thousand militants in Syria, including 4,5 thousand immigrants from Russia and the CIS countries, by air strikes and cruise missiles. Such data are given in a video published on Wednesday on the official channel of the Russian Ministry of Defense on YouTube.
                  The Russian Defense Ministry said that as of September 30, 2015, when the Russian operation in Syria began, only 8% of the territory of the Middle East country was under the control of government troops, the rest was controlled by "terrorists and other armed groups." The Syrian military, with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces, liberated 1,41 thousand settlements.
                  "As of August 21, 2018, 96,5% of the territory of Syria is under the control of government troops and militias, 3,5% are included in the Idlib de-escalation zone," the Russian military department said.
                  According to the data of the Ministry of Defense given in the video, as a result of air strikes and cruise missiles, the Russian military destroyed almost 121,5 thousand various terrorist objects, about 650 tanks and about 730 infantry fighting vehicles, almost 9 thousand vehicles equipped with anti-aircraft installations. "
                  professor "What are you talking about?"
                  For lorries, t-34 and UAZ.)))
                  1. +1
                    16 November 2020 22: 00
                    Quote: Nagaibak
                    professor "Should we wait to get killed?"
                    So this is just a car in order to accompany the convoy from point A to point B. In your UAZ patriot better than this?))) Give you an armored car. so they are there.)))

                    It was an armored car. Hot Caucasian guys can shoot there.

                    Quote: Nagaibak
                    "MOSCOW, August 22. / TASS /. The Russian military killed more than 86 thousand militants in Syria, including 4,5 thousand immigrants from Russia and the CIS countries, by air strikes and cruise missiles. Such data are given in a video published on Wednesday on the official channel of the Russian Ministry of Defense on YouTube.

                    They lie. The Russian Federation cannot carry out extrajudicial killings against 4500 people from the CIS, and even more so against citizens of the Russian Federation. Let me remind you that only a Russian court can recognize a citizen of the Russian Federation as a terrorist. Until the conviction is pronounced, the citizen is absolutely innocent.

                    Quote: Nagaibak
                    almost 121,5 thousand various terrorist objects, about 650 tanks and about 730 infantry fighting vehicles, almost 9 thousand vehicles equipped with anti-aircraft installations were destroyed. "

                    It's cool, though. Not terrorists, but some Rockefellers. 121,5 thousand different real estate objects? How many terrorists were there then? 1'215'000? Or does each terrorist have 5 different objects, 3 cars and 2 tanks?
                    1. +1
                      17 November 2020 11: 12
                      Professor "An armored car. Hot Caucasian guys can shoot there."
                      Yes, it's okay, all our army is not Israeli, so what would we shoot at them.))) Will escort the convoy and return.)))
                      professor "They lie. The Russian Federation cannot carry out extrajudicial killings against 4500 people from the CIS, and even more so against citizens of the Russian Federation"
                      We take an example from your country. yours do not give a fuck where to shoot.)))) So we try to follow the best Israeli experience. You are constantly giving us an example in this.)))
                      professor "It's cool, though. Not terrorists, but some Rockefellers."
                      Continue .... it's cool when you cut in a stupid one.))) Considering when half of the Syrian army fought against Assad, why be surprised?))))
                      1. +2
                        17 November 2020 16: 52
                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Yes, it's okay, all our army is not Israeli, so what would we shoot at them.))) Will escort the convoy and return.)))

                        It is clear that you are immortal, but still ...

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        We take an example from your country. yours do not give a fuck where to shoot.)))) So we try to follow the best Israeli experience. You are constantly giving us an example in this.)))

                        Nifiga. We do not spank our citizens without trial. Yes, and according to the court, the death penalty is not provided for. So go by.

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Continue .... it's cool when you cut in a stupid one.))) Considering when half of the Syrian army fought against Assad, why be surprised?))))

                        The number of terrorists' real estate is surprising. Sechin is resting. And it is surprising that you "half of the Syrian army" are registered as terrorists. Why exactly this half, and not the other?
                      2. 0
                        17 November 2020 17: 25
                        professor "It is clear that you are immortals, but still ..."
                        Some kind of nonsense))) An ordinary trip .... and you inflated it.)))) I understand you are scared, overpower yourself.)))
                        Professor "Nifiga. We do not spank our citizens without a trial. Yes, and we do not have the death penalty in court. So by."
                        And let us send our citizens professing a similar ideology to you in Israel. Give them your citizenship and you will kiss them on the gums))) Judge them there or how else to commit adultery with them.))) Nobody considers them for the citizens of Russia, so they are not judged.
                        Professor "And it is surprising that you have registered" half of the Syrian army "as terrorists. Why this half, and not the second?"
                        Well, at first they were rebels.))) Almost all Sunnis rebelled against Assad. And only then, many of them became terrorists. What's wrong? Will it be easier for you if we support everyone against whom you are fighting there as before? And we will say that they are fighters for the liberation of their native land from the Israeli military?)))) I think that the native Jews, unlike those who came in large numbers, do not think so. But those who have come in large numbers are trying to surpass the indigenous people in their patriotism.))))
                      3. +1
                        17 November 2020 20: 54
                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Some kind of nonsense))) An ordinary trip .... and you inflated it.)))) I understand you are scared, overpower yourself.)))

                        Why then even armored vehicles? Comfortable tourist buses are more suitable for "regular travel".

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        And let us send our citizens professing a similar ideology to you in Israel. Give them your citizenship and you will kiss them on the gums))) Judge them there or how else to commit adultery with them.))) Nobody considers them for the citizens of Russia, so they are not judged.

                        We only accept those who fall under the "Law of Return".
                        The Russian court did not deprive your "terrorists" of citizenship, and therefore it does not matter who and what counts.

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Well, at first they were rebels.))) Almost all Sunnis rebelled against Assad. And only then, many of them became terrorists. What's wrong?

                        Sunnis were and still constitute the majority of the population of the SAR. Can it be most population by terrorists?

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Will it be easier for you if we support everyone against whom you are fighting there as before? And we will say that they are fighters for the liberation of their native land from the Israeli military?)))) I think that the native Jews, unlike those who came in large numbers, do not think so. But those who have come in large numbers are trying to surpass the indigenous people in their patriotism.))))

                        RF IS ALWAYS supports anti-Israeli resolutions. IS ALWAYS supports all enemies of Israel. How can you scare us even more?

                        Native Israelis are very different and their opinions are also different. One thing unites them. They don't care about Russia. Russia, its people and the fact that you have them AT ALL not interested.
                      4. +1
                        17 November 2020 21: 36
                        professor "Why then armored vehicles at all?"
                        This is an escort car. WAI will write WAI. Maybe the service is intended for the rear. What is there now to dissect everyone on armored vehicles?))) That is, you deny the right to exist to an ordinary army SUV? Well, it's not some kind of Humvee.)))
                        the professor of "your" terrorists "was not deprived of citizenship by the Russian court, and therefore it does not matter who and what counts"
                        As it is least of all interested in who Israel accepts there. Our citizens who went to any kind of jihad took an oath to the world caliphate and do not consider Russia their homeland. So why should they be considered our citizens?))) You could become their human rights defender in various European courts))) You look dough would earn extra money. Nothing complicated ... expose Russia for all the garbage, and the grandmother will put the barmale in the pocket. not life, but raspberries.))) In general, what the hell do you need to have the court deprived of their citizenship or not.)))
                        Professor "The Sunnis were and are the majority of the population of the SAR. Could the majority of the population be terrorists?"
                        And who speaks. what all? Even I wrote to you that many. But not all))) You kind of let us be more careful without your these quirks.))) Have you heard that Putin (or someone from the Russian leadership) called them all terrorists? And you won't hear.))) These are YOUR words.)))
                        Professor "The Russian Federation ALWAYS supports anti-Israeli resolutions. ALWAYS supports all enemies of Israel. How can you frighten us further?"
                        Well, under Putin the relationship is not the same as under the USSR. No need to tell here.))) And what did Putin take against Israel? I honestly don't know. Maybe this is important for you and you know? And we don’t care so we don’t know.)))
                        professor "Native Israelis are very different and their opinions are also different. One thing unites them. They do not care about Russia."
                        Yes, native Jews and those who have come in large numbers do not care.))) And in Russia, the majority of the population does not care about both.))) Everyone has their own worries.))) And rightly so)))
                      5. +2
                        17 November 2020 22: 03
                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        This is an escort car. WAI will write WAI. Maybe the service is intended for the rear. What is there now to dissect everyone on armored vehicles?))) That is, you deny the right to exist to an ordinary army SUV? Well, it's not some kind of Humvee.)))

                        Definitely buses. good

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        As it is least of all interested in who Israel accepts there. Our citizens who went to any kind of jihad took an oath to the world caliphate and do not consider Russia their homeland. So why should they be considered our citizens?))) You could become their human rights defender in various European courts))) You look dough would earn extra money. Nothing complicated ... expose Russia for all the garbage, and the grandmother will put the barmale in the pocket. not life, but raspberries.))) In general, what the hell do you need to have the court deprived of their citizenship or not.)))

                        So why do you propose to Israel to accept them? Where is the logical chain?
                        The question is open: what is the right to destroy its citizens without trial or investigation?

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Could the majority of the population be terrorists? "
                        And who speaks. what all? Even I wrote to you that many. But not all))) You kind of let us be more careful without your these quirks.))) Have you heard that Putin (or someone from the Russian leadership) called them all terrorists? And you won't hear.))) These are YOUR words.)))

                        Money for the fish again? You destroyed the "terrorists" who turned out to be the majority of the population of the SAR. How so?

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Well, under Putin the relationship is not the same as under the USSR. No need to tell here.))) And what did Putin take against Israel? I honestly don't know. Maybe this is important for you and you know? And we don’t care so we don’t know.)))

                        Hmm ... Can you name at least ONE anti-Israeli resolution where the Russian Federation at least abstained? Well, at least one. Pliz, pliz, pliz.

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Yes, native Jews and those who have come in large numbers do not care.))) And in Russia, the majority of the population does not care about both.))) Everyone has their own worries.))) And rightly so)))

                        Here I am just about it. The locals are not interested in you here.
                      6. 0
                        18 November 2020 08: 42
                        Professor "Definitely buses"
                        Everyone has their own view of military equipment and its purpose.))) Do you like buses.)))
                        Professor "The question is open: by what right does he destroy his citizens without trial and investigation?"
                        Closed for you. you do not jump off the topic.))) You don't know what to write.)))
                        Professor "Hmm ... Can you name at least ONE anti-Israeli resolution where the Russian Federation at least abstained? Well, at least one. Pliz, pliz, pliz."
                        Heh heh heh question to question. How do you think.))) This is so familiar.)))) I wrote to you. I dont know. Well, since you claim that we have accepted something and give it.)))
                        professor "Here I am just about that. You are not interesting here to the locals."
                        And that's great. In Russia, the same attitude towards the Israelis))). And when you call Jews local, what category do you rank yourself in, not local or what? ))))) Also, when they lived in the USSR, were they not local too?)))
                      7. 0
                        18 November 2020 08: 58
                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Everyone has their own view of military equipment and its purpose.))) Do you like buses.)))

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        An ordinary trip ... and you inflated here.)))) I understand you're scared, overpower yourself.)))

                        Comfortable buses are most suitable for a regular trip. The topic is closed. hi

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Closed for you. you do not jump off the topic.))) You don't know what to write.)))

                        Extrajudicial killings of their citizens. By what right?

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Heh heh heh question to question. How do you think.))) This is so familiar.)))) I wrote to you. I dont know. Well, since you claim that we have accepted something and give it.)))

                        For instance. 9 anti-Israel resolutions in one day. RF for.
                        https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/gaspd688.doc.htm

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        And that's great. In Russia, the same attitude towards the Israelis))). And when you call Jews local, what category do you rank yourself in, not local or what? ))))) Also, when they lived in the USSR, were they not local too?)))

                        Locals are called "tsabras", repatriates are called "olim". Tsabram do not care about you, olim are interested in your affairs due to cultural ties. The longer the Ole lives in Israel, the less he is interested in the country of origin. This is ce la vie.
                      8. 0
                        18 November 2020 11: 43
                        professor "For example. 9 anti-Israeli resolutions in one day. RF for."
                        Thanks for the link. But the amazing case against you is over 150 countries. For 5 countries with Barbuda together)) and claims against us.))) And what is wrong with these resolutions?))) But before we delivered hail to the Palestinians ... but now we don't. And you tell me about the resolution.))))
                        professor "The locals are called" Tsabras ", the repatriates are" olim ".
                        Hmm ... white people have white bread, and black people black bread.))). Well, God be with them all. I am always happy if people find their homeland and go there. So they feel good there.))) I hope you are not bad there either.)))
                      9. 0
                        18 November 2020 14: 14
                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Thanks for the link. But the amazing case against you is over 150 countries. For 5 countries with Barbuda together)) and claims against us.))) And what is wrong with these resolutions?))) But before we delivered hail to the Palestinians ... but now we don't. And you tell me about the resolution.))))

                        We are sort of discussing Israeli-Russian relations, not "in general."
                        You have never directly supplied Grads to Fylystynts. You do this through third countries.

                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Hmm ... white people have white bread, and black people black bread.))). Well, God be with them all. I am always happy if people find their homeland and go there. So they feel good there.))) I hope you are not bad there either.)))

                        Thanks. We are fine, but we still complain. Our national trait is striving for excellence, and therefore we constantly complain.
                      10. 0
                        18 November 2020 18: 10
                        professor "You do it through third countries."
                        Do we also supply now? Do you have data? Or indirect evidence? I just don't see great reasons to supply them with something like in the Soviet years.
                        Professor "We are fine, but we still complain."
                        Everybody and everywhere complains about it. The dead just don't complain.)))
                      11. +1
                        18 November 2020 19: 21
                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        Do we also supply now? Do you have data? Or indirect evidence? I just don't see great reasons to supply them with something like in the Soviet years.

                        Of course you do. At our yellow school buses, terrorists shoot Russian ATGMs.
                      12. 0
                        19 November 2020 21: 42
                        Professor "Terrorists shoot Russian ATGMs at our yellow school buses."
                        Cornets or what? Or something different?
            2. 0
              17 November 2020 00: 14
              so militants in one very famous country are treated and resurrected
              1. -2
                17 November 2020 14: 49
                And what kind of country? what
    2. +1
      16 November 2020 09: 48
      Quote: professor
      Is it Russian equipment from the 102nd Russian base? But.

      If you are hinting at artillery, then the one shown on the video is now not the RF Armed Forces, it is clear that it was abandoned, apparently by the "brave" defenders of Artsykh ... And the artillery "Ural" has civilian numbers ... But why hide, but the advancement of our units is ensured by all possible forces and means, including artillery and aviation, so that especially zealous "hot heads" would have fewer desires to violate the agreements
  7. 0
    16 November 2020 10: 15
    One question: if "peacekeepers" were introduced and at the request of the Turks, is the territory of the former AzerSSR used for "logistic" tasks or was the corridor provided by the former Georgian SSR?
  8. +1
    16 November 2020 11: 41
    Eh, Tosochka would not hurt ... Yes, and reserve ammunition with fuels and lubricants. Better two.
    1. 0
      16 November 2020 12: 56
      Eh, Tosochka would not hurt ...


      Yes you are a "monster".
      1. -2
        17 November 2020 14: 50
        Rather an innovator hi
        1. 0
          17 November 2020 15: 02
          Rather an innovator hi

          Want a softer "meat" ...
  9. 0
    16 November 2020 13: 41
    If needed. 15th brigade from Samara. The numbers go by district.
    1. +2
      16 November 2020 17: 07
      Quote: Lptsk
      If needed. 15 brigade from Samara

      If so, then many units of the Russian Armed Forces have the status of peacekeeping forces, both in the Ground Forces and aviation units, and in the Airborne Forces and SOS. In the Airborne Forces, this is Ulyanovsk, the 31st separate airborne assault brigade.
      1. +1
        17 November 2020 13: 28
        Quote: Vladimir61
        In the Airborne Forces, this is Ulyanovsk, the 31st separate airborne assault brigade.

        Peacekeeping airborne assault brigade - that's five! smile
        Only the peacekeeping missile division can probably be cooler: "After us - silence".
        1. -1
          17 November 2020 14: 56
          And there is
          The main task of the Strategic Missile Forces is ensured by their availability and a guarantee of a retaliatory strike against an attack.
          This, first of all, restrains the possible inclinations of those who like to profit at someone else's expense and plant "democracy" in Russia in the form in which they, the "partners," want to. The Strategic Missile Forces is cooling the ardent hawks.
          Why is the Strategic Missile Forces not a peacekeeper in this case?
          Well it is, a view from the outside.
  10. -1
    16 November 2020 22: 20
    Azerbaijan (Turkey) won the war with drones alone, at the same time showing the prototype of the wars of the future, where the role of tanks and other armor is minimized. I wonder if the General Staff is analyzing this situation?
  11. -1
    17 November 2020 03: 26
    Quote: Fungus
    Grads, air defense and electronic warfare are needed so that there are no provocations from the Azeri and Turks.

    Why not Armenians yet? And what have the Turks to do with, are there Turkish troops there?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"