Military Review

Russian military completed the formation of all peacekeeping posts in Karabakh

133
Russian military completed the formation of all peacekeeping posts in Karabakh

In Nagorno-Karabakh, the formation of all posts of Russian peacekeepers has been completed. On the basis of the previously reached agreement, there are 25 such posts. They are located along the line of contact and in other territories, including the so-called Lachin (Berdzor) corridor.


In the named "corridor" with a width of up to 5 km, posts are set up in the temporary storage area. Lysogorsky, near the village of Zarysly, as well as along the Zabukh road near the village of the same name.

Along with the deployment of all peacekeeping observation posts, the formation of the main headquarters of the Russian peacekeeping mission has been completed. The headquarters is located in Stepanakert. The headquarters has direct communication channels with the military departments of Azerbaijan and Armenia. These channels are necessary for the operational exchange of data, including data that will allow avoiding emergency situations, suppressing provocations, etc.

At the same time, it was noted that not all Russian servicemen have arrived in Karabakh yet. The transfer of peacekeepers continues. According to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, 23 flights of the Russian aviation... Newly arriving servicemen will be distributed among the formed posts in Nagorno-Karabakh.

It is worth recalling that the day before, consultations with a delegation from Russia were held in Turkey. The Turkish Defense Minister and the Foreign Minister of this country, announcing the arrival of the Russian delegation, stated that the issue of "an equal peacekeeping mission of Turkey and Russia in Karabakh" would be discussed. But so far there is no evidence that the Turkish contingent is really participating in the peacekeeping mission in Karabakh. Although Aliyev and Erdogan spoke about this earlier. The results of the consultations that took place in Turkey are not presented either. The Russian Foreign Ministry has repeatedly noted that the agreement prescribes the presence of only the Russian peacekeeping contingent in Karabakh.
133 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Baloo
    Baloo 15 November 2020 19: 56 New
    30
    Military luck, patience and health, so that everyone will return safe and sound. drinks
    1. Bilal
      Bilal 15 November 2020 20: 38 New
      -40 qualifying.
      I connect to your wishes. And most importantly, I wish that they do not turn from peacekeepers into occupiers ... And so that the world, for the first time really sees the PEACEKEEPERS OF RUSSIA ...
      1. Baloo
        Baloo 15 November 2020 20: 44 New
        15
        Quote: Bilal
        I connect to your wishes. And most importantly, I wish that they do not turn from peacekeepers into occupiers ... And so that the world, for the first time really sees the PEACEKEEPERS OF RUSSIA ...

        And what, it was once different. Do not clog the ether. fool
        1. Bilal
          Bilal 15 November 2020 20: 59 New
          -34 qualifying.
          And what was once so? hi

          Judging by the minuses, even you yourself do not want to see the Russian soldier as a peacemaker))))
          1. kot423
            kot423 15 November 2020 21: 10 New
            +8
            From 404 it is always more visible ... Especially after glass wash and Turkish bacon.
            1. Xnumx vis
              Xnumx vis 15 November 2020 21: 40 New
              12
              Quote: kot423
              Turkish lard.

              Turkish lard ... It's strong! drinks
            2. Baloo
              Baloo 16 November 2020 06: 40 New
              +4
              Quote: kot423
              From 404 it is always more visible ... Especially after glass wash and Turkish bacon.

              Even funnier: this year Russia became the main supplier of lard to / to Ukraine wassat yes
          2. mole
            mole 15 November 2020 21: 15 New
            14
            Dear Bilal! Please do not "star"! A won battle does not mean victory in a war, especially with the support of outsiders. Tomorrow your opponent may receive such support, but at a much higher technical, tactical and strategic level.
            Born to trade - fights badly, and born to conquer - trades badly. Axiom!?
            1. Bilal
              Bilal 15 November 2020 21: 22 New
              -8
              Dear Leonid!
              Quote: Mole
              Tomorrow your opponent may receive such support, but at a much higher technical, tactical and strategic level.


              That is why I also wished that the Russian soldier was a PEACEKEEPER !!!
            2. Krasnodar
              Krasnodar 15 November 2020 23: 15 New
              -3
              Quote: Mole
              Dear Bilal! Please do not "star"! A won battle does not mean victory in a war, especially with the support of outsiders. Tomorrow your opponent may receive such support, but at a much higher technical, tactical and strategic level.
              Born to trade - fights badly, and born to conquer - trades badly. Axiom!?

              Yes, everyone has already seen that they were shouting for help from the head of the "war people" - maybe this racist canoe will be enough? I'm not talking about lies throughout the conflict
            3. The comment was deleted.
          3. seregin-s1
            seregin-s1 15 November 2020 22: 03 New
            +2
            Train your brain, learn Russian! It will definitely come in handy!
      2. Pechkin
        Pechkin 15 November 2020 21: 22 New
        12
        (Bilal: And most importantly, I wish that they do not turn from peacekeepers into occupiers ...) Well, what our peacekeepers have occupied, for example, in Angola, Chad, Sierra Leone, Sudan. Maybe Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Metohija are occupied. Do not talk nonsense. it hurts.
        1. Bilal
          Bilal 15 November 2020 21: 34 New
          -18 qualifying.
          Pridnestrovie, Ossetia, Abkhazia, Donbass, etc. could have written with the same "success". Indeed, do not talk nonsense hurts her ...

          Why was the true desire immediately taken with hostility ??? request
          1. Xnumx vis
            Xnumx vis 15 November 2020 21: 42 New
            +3
            Quote: Bilal
            Pridnestrovie, Ossetia, Abkhazia, Donbass, etc. could have written with the same "success". Indeed, do not talk nonsense hurts her ...

            You freak, insistently mumble nonsense! ... There is no desire to argue with you. I don’t want to get dirty!
            1. Bilal
              Bilal 15 November 2020 22: 13 New
              -10 qualifying.
              Our feelings are mutual yes
          2. Pechkin
            Pechkin 15 November 2020 21: 52 New
            +8
            Bilal your words: And so that the world, for the first time really saw the PEACEKEEPERS OF RUSSIA ... I showed that the world has already seen this and more than once. And we brought peacekeepers to Donbass, although it might have been worth it to stop what is happening there and perhaps not peacekeepers.
      3. poquello
        poquello 15 November 2020 21: 31 New
        +5
        Quote: Bilal
        so that the world for the first time really sees the PEACES OF RUSSIA ...

        have not really seen the peacekeepers of Russia? look in Ossetia in August 08
        Quote: Bilal
        Judging by the cons

        I'd give you more
    2. smart ass
      smart ass 16 November 2020 12: 15 New
      0
      Interestingly, the peacekeepers went and took the shells and tori from the drones?
    3. max702
      max702 17 November 2020 17: 34 New
      +1
      We are not needed there .. They did not understand anything ... They have one thing .. - "Russia must !!"
  2. Lexus
    Lexus 15 November 2020 19: 57 New
    15
    I wish all our military men to return from there safe and sound.
  3. Russ
    Russ 15 November 2020 20: 10 New
    +4
    Border is locked tight...
    I think that there will be no inclinations ... they will not risk it ...
    1. Bolt cutter
      Bolt cutter 15 November 2020 20: 25 New
      -8
      They will easily risk tomatoes. Alas and ah.
      1. halpat
        halpat 15 November 2020 21: 16 New
        +8
        Quote: Bolt Cutter
        They will easily risk tomatoes. Alas and ah.

        how not to lose these same "tomatoes", those who try to take risks. wink
        1. Bolt cutter
          Bolt cutter 15 November 2020 21: 56 New
          -10 qualifying.
          so risked already. Tomatoes are OK /
    2. figwam
      figwam 15 November 2020 20: 33 New
      +5
      The main thing is that all this does not develop into explosions of land mines during the movement of columns and attacks on checkpoints.
      1. halpat
        halpat 15 November 2020 21: 17 New
        +3
        Well, do not confuse guerrilla attacks in Chechnya with the current situation.
  4. Alien From
    Alien From 15 November 2020 20: 14 New
    +3
    The main thing is without excesses!
  5. rruvim
    rruvim 15 November 2020 20: 15 New
    -21 qualifying.
    Is there enough 1960 peacekeepers on this territory, provided that only two-thirds will be on guard. 25 Armenians (from the armies of the AR and NK) could not cope with this. Are 000 "light" armored personnel carriers enough? Something "flimsy" layer looms. Or is it some other "tricky" move of the Brigadier? What-to substitute these few units for the Turkish-Azerbaijani troops, like the Georgian troops in South Ossetia in August 90 and then increase the grouping tenfold?
    1. Vitaly161
      Vitaly161 15 November 2020 20: 30 New
      17
      don't you confuse the peacekeeping mission and the regular army? peacekeepers always have limited weapons, it's good at least there are armored personnel carriers and turntables
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 15 November 2020 20: 42 New
        -7
        No, I don't!
        French self-propelled guns AMX in Lebanon under the UN flag. And we in Karabakh, within the framework of the peacekeeping mission, need MSTA-S.
        1. Bilal
          Bilal 15 November 2020 21: 01 New
          +4
          And let's immediately Iskander, Zircon, C 500 and as a bonus Sarmat)))))))
          1. rruvim
            rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 03 New
            -3
            Why exaggerate? But the absence of even a tank battalion is alarming!
            1. kot423
              kot423 15 November 2020 21: 13 New
              +3
              Quote: rruvim
              But the absence of even a tank battalion is alarming!

              And turn on your head? How many Armenian tanks were burned from the UAV? And now the question: for the UAV - layered air defense, for its protection - add. strength. And in the end? Maybe just a couple of armies to throw there?
              1. rruvim
                rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 23 New
                -3
                You yourself have answered my concern! Don't need a couple of armies! But it is necessary to create a balanced peacekeeping force with tanks, military air defense and self-propelled guns. There is aviation - Gyumri. And to place, again peacekeepers, as in "the times of Pristina and Tskhinvali" with only armored personnel carriers is clearly not worth it. From the first place "got away", in the second they lost several dozen Russian soldiers.
                1. kot423
                  kot423 15 November 2020 21: 25 New
                  +3
                  Quote: rruvim
                  it is necessary to create a balanced peacekeeping group with tanks, air defense and self-propelled guns.

                  Will you supply it on your own transport? Sending 1 transporter once a month (roughly) is not 20.
                  1. rruvim
                    rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 29 New
                    -6
                    Then, there is no need to place 1960 Russian hostages with small arms there at all! If you can't even provide them ...
                    1. kot423
                      kot423 15 November 2020 21: 34 New
                      +7
                      Quote: rruvim
                      Then, there is no need to place 1960 Russian hostages with small arms there!

                      You are talking such nonsense ... fool Not posted = received 1. mountains. a point at hand, 2. Turkish protectorate, which is also fraught. It is stupid to place 100500 divisions there, 1st help from Gyumri, then - to the point that the attacker will be rolled out with calibers (simplified). Comparing with 08.08 is also stupid, comparing the state of the army then and now.
                      1. rruvim
                        rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 39 New
                        -2
                        It is you who are jurapatriotic nonsense. They got a hot spot already on September 27, or rather 28 years ago. So, don't be surprised. AND that's enough about Calibers. Don't fetish them. An ordinary cruise missile, the technology of which is possessed by most of the industrialized countries of the world, including Turkey.
                      2. kot423
                        kot423 15 November 2020 21: 43 New
                        +1
                        Quote: rruvim
                        An ordinary cruise missile, the technology of which is possessed by most of the industrialized countries of the world, including Turkey.

                        You quickly changed your skis laughing The discussion about supporting the peacekeepers was going on, why did you start groveling about the CD? Or is the caliber a NUR that flies wherever he wants?
                      3. rruvim
                        rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 58 New
                        -8
                        Just the answer, ordinary people who just look at it - "further - to the point that the attacker will be rolled out with calibers" It became - just a meme. Look at any problem, including geopolitical, "wider and deeper. And even problems with the production of" notorious "calibers. For example, with the financial condition of the Reutov plant. I mean why our Jurapatriots are all some kind of" caliber " Here, in Karabakh, it is clear, not with an armed eye, that our peacekeepers will not hold out for a long time (there are few of them and they are poorly armed) if the Turkish military machine rolls on them (the Azerbaijani army is de facto part of it) Why this setup?
                      4. kot423
                        kot423 15 November 2020 22: 07 New
                        +2
                        Quote: rruvim
                        And even for problems with the production of "notorious" calibers. For example, with the financial condition of the Reutov plant.

                        Oh how laughing Those. YOU here at first crucify:
                        it is necessary to create a balanced peacekeeping group with tanks, air defense and self-propelled guns.

                        and you do not care from the high bell tower how much the supply of this group will cost, and immediately on the other hand - whining about Fin. affairs in Reutov (i.e., in fact, the fate of the peacekeepers is already on the sidelines) ... laughing
                        You at least re-read your comments, otherwise everything will be "pad steel" from you.
                      5. rruvim
                        rruvim 15 November 2020 22: 11 New
                        -8
                        Well, if you are not able to supply a more or less combat-ready group, then you do not need to create it. And it is right! But then it is more criminal to create an initially incapacitated group that you are somehow able to supply, but knowing full well that it is a "ritual" victim. If, for example, you have a goal, and knowing that the Turks will sooner or later "roll out" it. But the goal is Constantinople! Then it is clear, you can sacrifice the Ulyanovsk brigade ...
                      6. kot423
                        kot423 15 November 2020 22: 22 New
                        +3
                        Quote: rruvim
                        But then it is more criminal to create initially incapable grouping

                        Quote: rruvim
                        and knowing that the Turks will sooner or later "roll it out"


                        Quote: rruvim
                        you can donate the Ulyanovsk brigade ...


                        Facts about all the delirium that I put above - is there? Or, again, "ski change" will follow in the style:
                        Just the answer, ordinary people who just look at it

                        ?
                      7. rruvim
                        rruvim 15 November 2020 22: 24 New
                        -6
                        Consider what you want! Time will judge.
                      8. V1er
                        V1er 16 November 2020 04: 59 New
                        +1
                        There is a deep meaning in your words. Only, behave not rudely, like an elephant in a shop, but on the sly. We may well bring serious armed forces to the military base of Armenia, as a guarantor for peacekeepers, in case something suddenly happens. The grouping should be sufficient to hold the Turks back to the hole in the corridor from the mainland. This needs to be discussed with the Armenians, it would be nice to have a completely pro-Russian government and generals there. I would also have forgotten some sky control station to keep Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Georgia under a hood and see all possible aviation in the sky. But in this case, it is necessary to somehow appease Aliyev from placing Turkish bases on his territory. Perhaps the pact with Iran is like a red line. Perhaps the strengthening of the Caspian flotilla is enough to crush any Caspian country from the sea. ...
              2. poquello
                poquello 15 November 2020 23: 13 New
                0
                Quote: rruvim
                Here, in Karabakh, it is clear with an unarmed eye that our peacekeepers will not hold out for a long time

                ndya, but also there are police patrols - what if the bandits attack and there will be few police officers, and don't understand who is driving on the roads - each traffic cop has an armored personnel carrier, and we need to put an army at each of our embassies, the sea is restless - we need our fleet sailed past a potential enemy in a large fleet
    2. Runway
      Runway 16 November 2020 03: 26 New
      0
      That's for sure ... 100 tons per month - only the SFC of the introduced grouping. For each car the average daily mileage will be about 50 km. So the sides and columns of the BMO will often wobble.
  • Bilal
    Bilal 15 November 2020 21: 27 New
    -6
    Quote: rruvim
    Why exaggerate? But the absence of even a tank battalion is alarming!


    And our tanks will help. I do not think that Azerbaijan has any inconsistencies with Russia.

    Quote: Mikhail S.
    Aliyev is a wise man.
    He ceded to Russia the right to be responsible for everything that happens in Karabakh.


    That's it...
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 31 New
      -3
      Tanks have a more psychological effect. And pretty serious.
  • Polymer
    Polymer 15 November 2020 20: 37 New
    11
    Quote: rruvim
    Is there enough 1960 peacekeepers in this territory

    They are peacekeepers, not invaders. In the event of hostilities, yes, their task is to hold out until the main forces arrive.
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 15 November 2020 20: 45 New
      -1
      They are peacekeepers, not invaders. In the event of hostilities, yes, their task is to hold out until the main forces arrive.
      And where will the main forces come from? There was the Roki tunnel in South Ossetia. And where is it from here?
      1. Polymer
        Polymer 15 November 2020 20: 47 New
        +6
        From Gyumri, for example.
        1. rruvim
          rruvim 15 November 2020 20: 48 New
          -3
          Quote: Polymer
          From Gyumri, for example.

          And what about Gyumri? Have you got a lot of reserves?
          1. Polymer
            Polymer 15 November 2020 20: 50 New
            +1
            Quote: rruvim
            And what about Gyumri? Have you got a lot of reserves?

            Well, no?
            1. rruvim
              rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 14 New
              +1
              The number of Russian base in Gyumri is 4000 people, in addition to military personnel, there are cooks, cooks, drivers, boiler operators, plumbers, accountants, ladies from the creative intelligentsia, etc. and the like. Among the rest - mainly pilots, helicopter pilots, air defense-nicknames and those who serve them. staff. This is not a reserve of peacekeepers, rather a support force.
              1. Polymer
                Polymer 15 November 2020 21: 30 New
                +5
                Quote: rruvim
                in addition to military personnel, there are cooks, cooks, drivers, boiler operators, plumbers, accountants, ladies from the creative intelligentsia, etc. etc..

                All of the above - in addition to the 4000 main team.
                102vb - for emergency support of peacekeepers. And so there is also a common border with Azerbaijan, and Georgia has now opened its airspace. Iran, after all. I suppose people are no more stupid than we have already thought about it.
                1. rruvim
                  rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 35 New
                  -5
                  https://m.haqqin.az/news/193970
                  If they were smarter, they would not have surrendered Shusha. And Georgia, both opened and closed. If they "kill" our peacekeepers, they will "gladly" close them! And Iran? A separate topic ...
                  1. Polymer
                    Polymer 15 November 2020 21: 37 New
                    +4
                    Quote: rruvim
                    If they were smarter, they would not surrender Shusha

                    Upps! And what does the Russian peacekeepers have to do with it?
                    Quote: rruvim
                    And Georgia, both opened and will close

                    As it closes, it will open again. A kind word, or a kind word and "Colt" will help to convince.
                    1. rruvim
                      rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 43 New
                      -5
                      Quote: Polymer
                      Upps! And what does the Russian peacekeepers have to do with it?
                      But think about it!
                    2. rruvim
                      rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 51 New
                      -6
                      As it closes, it will open again. A kind word, or a kind word and "Colt" will help to convince.
                      "The ability to fantasize and daydream distinguishes the common man from the politician." - W. Churchill.
      2. ANB
        ANB 15 November 2020 21: 21 New
        +7
        ... And where will the main forces come from? There was the Roki tunnel in South Ossetia. And where is it from here?

        From Dagestan through Azerbaijan.
        Aliyev got what he wanted at this stage. It is unprofitable for Azerbaijan to escalate in the near future.
        It means that only Armenians can take the risk. And that is unlikely. Not exactly stupid.
        Ours are there only to track provocations.
        1. Rubina
          Rubina 15 November 2020 23: 27 New
          0
          Listen, her Erdogan and Aliyev couldn’t be mad to fight Russia. We are very glad that Russian peacekeepers are there. Otherwise, the Armenians would shout to the whole world that they are being slaughtered and killed. Every day the peacekeepers put up videos of Armenians burning houses, killing livestock, chopping down trees and removing power poles. This is all documentary evidence filmed by a neutral party. We are ready to sue Armenia in the amount of 50 billion, the Armenians themselves are throwing another 5-10 billion.
          1. ANB
            ANB 15 November 2020 23: 46 New
            +1
            ... We are very glad that Russian peacekeepers are there. Otherwise, the Armenians would have yelled all over the world that they are being slaughtered and killed.

            Here it is, the voice of the people.
            And that is why there will be no Turks in Karabakh. Aliyev will not let them go there.
          2. ANB
            ANB 16 November 2020 00: 00 New
            +2
            ... We are ready to sue Armenia in the amount of 50 billion, the Armenians themselves are throwing another 5-10 billion.

            To sue the Armenians? Is this a joke of humor you have? ... You would have filed a lawsuit against Israel. :)
    2. Bilal
      Bilal 15 November 2020 21: 06 New
      -5
      Quote: Polymer

      They are peacekeepers, not invaders.


      That's it. Bow to common sense ... drinks
  • Mikhail S.
    Mikhail S. 15 November 2020 20: 41 New
    +6
    Aliyev is a wise man.
    He ceded to Russia the right to be responsible for everything that happens in Karabakh.
  • Bilal
    Bilal 15 November 2020 20: 47 New
    -4
    Quote: rruvim
    Is there enough 1960 peacekeepers on this territory, provided that only two-thirds will be on guard. 25 Armenians (from the armies of the AR and NK) could not cope with this. Are 000 "light" armored personnel carriers enough? Something "flimsy" layer looms. Or is it some other "tricky" move of the Brigadier? What-to substitute these few units for the Turkish-Azerbaijani troops, like the Georgian troops in South Ossetia in August 90 and then increase the grouping tenfold?


    Enough, enough ... Your worries about Azerbaijan are in vain. 25 (although judging by Pashik's statements, considering that 000 - 25000 zinvors could have been captured and in addition 30000 - 4000 killed (if we also add 5000 - 12000 wounded) - then there were much more of them) Armenians could not, because they were the occupiers and God punished them ... I hope the Russian soldiers will not behave like masters ... And there will be no problems ...
    And about Putin (Brigadier) I can say that he really acted cunningly. I waited for the right moment and with one throw knocked both fighters to the ground))))
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 15 November 2020 20: 52 New
      -5
      Here, you will not be especially masters: around the Turkish-Azerbaijani troops with mercenaries from Syria, and behind the Armenians, eager for revenge. And oh, how far is it to the main troops in Russia!
  • Otshelnik
    Otshelnik 15 November 2020 20: 45 New
    -1
    https://m.haqqin.az/news/193970
    About the capture of Shusha ..
  • voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 15 November 2020 20: 59 New
    +5
    It was like an interesting experiment.
    To airlift one infantry brigade (1 people) with equipment, it takes about 25 flights of large transport workers and 2 days of time.
    This is in peacetime without interference and opposition from the enemy.
    Think about how troops will be transferred, for example, to the Far East, if tensions arise with China or Japan.
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 47 New
      -4
      I would write "no way", but I will write: the good old railway. But if, of course, with Japan. And China will simply "cut" the Transib, and that's it!
    2. poquello
      poquello 15 November 2020 21: 53 New
      +1
      Quote: voyaka uh
      It was like an interesting experiment.
      To airlift one infantry brigade (1 people) with equipment, it takes about 25 flights of large transport workers and 2 days of time.
      This is in peacetime without interference and opposition from the enemy.
      Think about how troops will be transferred, for example, to the Far East, if tensions arise with China or Japan.

      China is planning a war with the United States, they don’t need us as opponents, and for Japan one big torpedo is enough
    3. NKT
      NKT 15 November 2020 22: 03 New
      +7
      When you don't need to rush, you can take two days. How many tanks did America carry across Poland?
      And when necessary, then:
      At the Kavkaz-2020 exercises, a DShBr was landed directly on the battlefield from helicopters + about 1000 people and 69 pieces of equipment were dropped in an hour.
      In 2019, 1500 and 200 units of equipment were parachuted
      In 2017, 2.5 thousand were parachuted. + 5 thousand people were transferred over 2000 km.
      Of course, there is much more to strive for, the USSR parachuted the division.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 15 November 2020 23: 32 New
        -2
        Teaching is a good thing. But it is thought out in advance, prepared,
        adjusts. And here - the real operation. Not at the range.
        In Kapustin Yar, air defense crushes all targets into powder.
        And in Karabakh, as we saw in the video, he runs and hides from drones,
        helplessly spinning the radars.
    4. ZEMCH
      ZEMCH 16 November 2020 01: 28 New
      +2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      It was like an interesting experiment.
      To airlift one infantry brigade (1 people) with equipment, it takes about 25 flights of large transport workers and 2 days of time.
      This is in peacetime without interference and opposition from the enemy.
      Think about how troops will be transferred, for example, to the Far East, if tensions arise with China or Japan.

      In the Far East, all weapons are at storage bases, only personnel will be moved, such exercises have already been conducted. East-2018
      In preparation for the Vostok-2018 maneuvers, measures were taken with the practical delivery of mobilization resources. 21 formations were mobilized in 10 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, several thousand citizens were called up from the reserve. In the Southern and Central Military Districts, units of territorial troops were formed, which were transferred by military transport aviation to the Eastern Military District to carry out combat training tasks

      The storage bases of military equipment were checked, with practical de-conservation and delivery to mobilized units.
      For the landing of the airborne troops on the Tsugol training ground, 25 IL-76 aircraft were used
    5. iouris
      iouris 16 November 2020 10: 21 New
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Consider how troops will be transferred, for example, to the Far East

      One of two things: either they will "deploy" the warheads, or it will be like in Armenia. And we will observe how it will be in Armenia.
  • yfast
    yfast 15 November 2020 21: 04 New
    -3
    Completed, so they will live in tents?
    1. Ragnarok
      Ragnarok 15 November 2020 21: 08 New
      +2
      Some kind of infrastructure should have remained from the former army of the former Karabakh.
      1. halpat
        halpat 15 November 2020 21: 23 New
        -2
        Quote: Ragnarok
        Some kind of infrastructure should have remained from the former army of the former Karabakh.

        what is shown on TV - some chalabudas, slovenly folded from foam concrete, dirty ... some kind of bedbugs.
        there will have to be done again, if not all.
    2. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 15 November 2020 21: 13 New
      +4
      Quote: yfast
      Completed, so they will live in tents?

      So what? I lived and did not freeze.
  • Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 15 November 2020 21: 26 New
    +2
    Promptly))

    And the Turk goes to the forest))
  • rruvim
    rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 27 New
    -3
    Quote: ANB
    Ours are there only to track provocations.

    But here's a provocation: the Azerbaijanis shot down our MI-24 over the Armenian territory. We "tracked". So, what is next?
  • rruvim
    rruvim 15 November 2020 21: 45 New
    -4
    Quote: Bilal
    I do not think that Azerbaijan has any inconsistencies with Russia.
    Just - sheer inconsistency! For example: about the participation of Turkish "peacekeepers".
    1. Pechkin
      Pechkin 15 November 2020 22: 15 New
      +2
      Yes, the only inconsistency is the participation of Turkey. But you seriously think that Azerbaijan is so dizzy with success. And they will begin an operation to destroy 2000 Russian peacekeepers. It will be a war. And do not need an example about the Turks and the SU-24 (I’m in advance). you are smart enough not to try to bomb Tartus or Khmeimim, and this is an even more remote theater of operations.
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 15 November 2020 22: 22 New
        -7
        Now the Turks will not touch 2000 peacekeepers. For they are not a hindrance to them. We will be "touched" by the Armenians. Rather, the Turks are behind our backs. And we are at the "crossroads". This is not Ossetia with Abkhazia. Armenians won't calm down! They will come to their senses a little, and go ahead. And our small posts will not shoot at Armenians and Turks! Unless, of course, there is a more geopolitical game going on here. Then our peacekeepers must become victims at some point. Not an enviable fate!
        1. Pechkin
          Pechkin 15 November 2020 22: 33 New
          +2
          Here I agree with you that a great danger now comes from the Armenians. Moreover, they will not shoot at our peacekeepers, but you can be caught between two fires. In general, a powerful group is not required there, they are not there in order to fight with Turkey or Azerbajan. just keep track of the agreements and that the civilians quietly withdraw without massacre. When a serious conflict starts again, I think they have an order to just withdraw.
          1. rruvim
            rruvim 15 November 2020 22: 38 New
            -4
            Quote: Pechkin
            At the beginning of a serious conflict again, I think they have an order to just retreat
            Then what's the point? Just wasting time?
            1. Pechkin
              Pechkin 15 November 2020 23: 23 New
              0
              To control the implementation of agreements and delimit the parties. Now you imagine the border between Azerbaijan and Armenia as between Russia and Finland. Like here you leave the customs post with customs officers and there is a sign welcome to Azerbaijan. And even more so the Armenian army is leaving. And you yourself indicated : checkpoints (25 pieces of 50 fighters each) and so answered their question. They will guard the border (delimit the sides). So that, without an order, hotheads do not roll back and forth and do all sorts of lewdness. They will stand by the roads, guard some villages or monuments. In general, they are not there to confront the advancing army. But in the event of a large-scale conflict again, they will simply leave, but it will be clear who broke the peace and how to react.
              1. rruvim
                rruvim 15 November 2020 23: 34 New
                -3
                Do you understand that there is an almost direct border between Russia and Finland? And here: a puff pie - the Armenian mountains, then the Azerbaijani valley, then the Armenian and Azerbaijani mountains, then the Armenian valley. Two main roads with serpentines, shooting from the other side. Look at the map! Why was there a problem in Abkhazia with the Gali region, on the one hand, clearly Georgian villages, on the other, clearly Abkhazian. The peacekeepers were constantly bombarded from one side and the other. But the events of 2008 dotted the i's, and only Abkhaz ones remained. And now we are stepping on the same "rake".
    2. Bilal
      Bilal 15 November 2020 22: 20 New
      -3
      Well, this is for you and me "inconsistency" and ... And for "THEM" everything was agreed long ago. Remember when our president said "Without Shusha, our business is unfinished" ... Do you think he said this for the people?
  • svoit
    svoit 15 November 2020 21: 53 New
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    It was like an interesting experiment.

    You are not mistaken? Do you really need 50 flights?
    And this is along the shortest path, which will close in a couple of days. And you will have to fly through Dagestan and Azerbaijan.
  • north 2
    north 2 15 November 2020 22: 24 New
    +2
    Putin and Shoigu are great.
    In the Crimea, then, in the evening there was not a single "green, polite little man". And in the morning oppa ... and there are already 25 of them, with weapons, ammunition and equipment, although not a single soldier and sailor left the territories of the units and ships of the Russian base in Crimea stationed there.
    In Syria, then, in the evening there were no Russian Aerospace Forces, and in the morning they were already from the aerodrome of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria
    bombed the barmaley from ISIS and the columns of Turkish oil tankers in Syria. You just need to imagine how
    closely and in the Crimea and Syria, everything was observed by US intelligence. And from space and on earth and above water and under water. Especially in the Crimea. The most delicious springboard for both the United States and Turkey. And for those you - Putin
    and Shoigu with the Army and Navy of Russia took the Crimea out of the very nose and without a single shot.
    There was a base of the Russian Army in Armenia. Armenia and Azerbaijan started a military conflict in Karabakh. And only once ... and in one phone call from Putin to Aliyev and Pashanyan, the conflict is over and the Russian base is already in Azerbaijan. And what kind of equipment, equipment, what kind of equipment and electronic warfare stations were brought in, one can only guess! And there is no need to say here that these are peacekeepers and that they are there temporarily. That the peacekeepers are yes, the Russian soldier is everywhere and always a peacemaker, but the fact that this military
    base in Azerbaijan for sooo long, then this is a fact.
    Gone are the days when the liberalist Medvedev's army was ashamed of Tskhinal to come for a ride on tanks in Tbilisi. But they had to do it. Although, probably it was Putin who banned the armies of the DPR and LPR
    take a ride on tanks to Mariupol. It seems to be not a liberalist, but why then he is not well done there and
    acted like a liberalist Medvedev ...?
    1. Aviator_
      Aviator_ 15 November 2020 22: 37 New
      +1
      Although, probably it was Putin who banned the armies of the DPR and LPR
      take a ride on tanks to Mariupol.

      Very similar to that. So that the oligarch Akhmetov could continue to export his products. Business, nothing personal.
    2. rruvim
      rruvim 15 November 2020 22: 39 New
      -5
      Look at the map! Globe!
    3. Alena-Baku
      Alena-Baku 15 November 2020 22: 41 New
      -8
      No need to judge your enemy, each victory listed was very costly for Russia, and if you consider that the victories were not in the zone of American interests, you can just say about a successful defense.
      1. north 2
        north 2 15 November 2020 23: 16 New
        +2
        it is difficult to find any more interests than US interests in Syria. One ISIS that meant, created and armed by America. Today, only those who were not killed by Russia and Assad's army moved to Azerbaijan
        tens, and tens of thousands would have moved if these tens of thousands in Syria did not destroy the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria. And the fact that several dozen Russian soldiers died in Syria, so soldiers are always their death
        bring peace and save the Motherland. Such is the proportion of those who defend the Motherland, and not necessarily on their own
        native land. There is no need to wait, as in 1941, for a clear enemy to come to our homeland.
        kill. That's why our soldiers died in Syria. Yes, the US and NATO are also enemies, but they have reason
        and understands how the aggression against Russia will end. You can negotiate with them. And the ISIS bandits
        crazy religious fanatics. It's like drug addicts because fascism, that religious fanaticism
        there is a psychological addiction only not by chemical but by ideological means. Therefore, Stalin and Zhukov with Soviet soldiers were treated for fascist drug addiction, and Putin and Shoigu with soldiers of the Russian army are being treated for drug addiction of religious fanaticism ...
        .
        1. Alena-Baku
          Alena-Baku 16 November 2020 00: 45 New
          -6
          no ISIL does not exist, certain groups are subordinate to the intelligence of the superpowers. And at the expense of Igil in Azerbaijan, at least one dead or alive was found, not found because they were not there.
  • rruvim
    rruvim 15 November 2020 22: 35 New
    -6
    If the Turkish-Azerbaijani troops decide that our peacekeeping contingent (miserable 1960 fighters and 90 armored personnel carriers) cannot protect the Azerbaijani settlers from the small arms of Armenian separatists, they will sweep away the Ulyanovsk brigade in a few days, but they will not sweep it away, they will simply send roadblocks (25 pieces of 50 fighters) to "quarantine". And who? Where from? Will they be released? The Armenian army will be gone! She was sent home. Moreover, a new region appeared in front of it - Kelbajar, flooded not by Azerbaijani settlers, but by the Azerbaijani army with Syrian settlers - Turkomen.
    1. ANB
      ANB 15 November 2020 23: 14 New
      +4
      ... cannot save the Azerbaijani settlers from the small fire of Armenian separatists, then the Ulyanovsk brigade will be swept away in a few days

      If the Armenians shoot, the Azerbaijanis will immediately become allies and help the peacekeepers to restore order. Or, at the very least, they will help to transfer extra strength. Why Azerbaijan should attack is completely incomprehensible, since it was Aliyev who called ours. He still has to excuse himself from the Turks.
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 15 November 2020 23: 25 New
        -4
        Quote: ANB
        since it was Aliyev who called our
        Exactly! In order to return Karabakh to our Turkish jurisdiction with OUR hands.
        1. ANB
          ANB 15 November 2020 23: 37 New
          +2
          ... return Karabakh to its Turkish jurisdiction.

          Aliyev left Karabakh to the Armenians for now.
          He practically took the rest himself.
          Aliyev is not a Turk.
          The agreement is now beneficial for both Azerbaijan and Armenia.
          Azerbaijan has consolidated its successes de jure.
          Armenia escaped complete defeat and saved, in fact, Karabakh (Stepanakert).
          1. rruvim
            rruvim 15 November 2020 23: 47 New
            -3
            Well, you, as our "note-taking" political scientists say "write".
            Aliyev is clearly not a Turk! But not a Persian either!
            Aliyev left Karabakh to the Armenians for now.
            The most important thing here "while"!!!
            1. ANB
              ANB 15 November 2020 23: 55 New
              0
              ... The most important thing here is "bye" !!!

              Well, the Armenians haven’t worked out this "yet".
              This is their advance. While. If they behave well.
              And they behaved very badly lately.
              2016 Pashinyan, Mara Baghdasaryan.
              Further anti-Russian speeches.
              And when in 2020 they did not come to the biathlon (and Azerbaijan did), I thought that they would be shocked. And they got it.
              Although in fact, I like to deal with Armenians more than with Azerbaijanis.
              But, apparently, they had no luck with the rulers this time. And Azerbaijan was lucky.
              1. rruvim
                rruvim 16 November 2020 00: 05 New
                +1
                Actually, if Sargsyan remained, then there would be no war. Neither the Brigadier nor Aliyev could stand this little Pashinyan little pig. And now the "leaders" decide a lot, even if they are at least three times Freemasons, or members of an international secret government. The brigadier and Aliyev punished the Armenians only for the vector towards the West. The foreman is simply "offended", and Aliyev looks into Erdogan's teeth.
    2. Alexander Seklitsky
      Alexander Seklitsky 16 November 2020 11: 57 New
      0
      yes yes just the same swept away. Stop carrying your alarmist heresy. All the branch has already been dirtied.
  • maktub
    maktub 15 November 2020 22: 50 New
    -9
    True or fake, it's not for me to judge
    ⁉️The network is spreading messages about a shootout between Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh and some formations.

    At the moment, there is no confirmation of these messages.

    Most likely, there is a provocative stuffing, the possibility of which was discussed from the very beginning of the deployment of the peacekeeping contingent of the RF Armed Forces in the region, in order to discredit the mission itself.
    #Karabakh

    @new_militarycolumnist
  • rruvim
    rruvim 15 November 2020 22: 53 New
    -6
    Here infa passed:
    "Turn it on!" When asked if he wanted to read the text before signing, the Russian leader replied: "No, why should I read it ?! I wrote this."
    Those. The brigadier himself determined the number of soldiers. is he easily could have indicated 5000 peacekeepers, but he limited himself only to the Ulyanovsk brigade. So it is important for him to show someone that the forces of the Russian Federation in this mountainous and wooded area are purely nominal, that both sides are tempted to either take revenge or finish what they have begun. Means: the war is not over yet. But is Russia ready for it? After all, as Pashinyan led the entire Armenian people by the "nose", so our generals can lead our Solntseliky by the "nose".
  • rruvim
    rruvim 15 November 2020 23: 22 New
    -4
    Quote: Alena-Baku
    Don't not judge your enemy

    Well, there is a myth that the Karabakh Armenians did not underestimate their enemy. In fact, they came face to face with Turkish and kamikaze-Israeli drones back in 2016, and the Nagorno-Karabakh army knew perfectly well how events would develop. Therefore, I bought several dozen decommissioned "OS" from Jordan, allegedly for imitators. But the Karabakh Armenians underestimated the Armenians in the metropolis, who did not give a damn about the Armenian Karabakh. The Armenian army itself never came to the rescue.
    1. north 2
      north 2 15 November 2020 23: 29 New
      +3
      The 40 thousandth regular aria of Armenia was never taken out even from the barracks in places of constant
      deployment in Armenia. There is a lot of info about this on the internet.
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 15 November 2020 23: 42 New
        -2
        Well, this is now clear to everyone! Harutyunyan unequivocally hinted about this. And the footage of attempts to repulse "Shushi" from ANNA, where only two tanks and 30 volunteers in collector Fords add information to the conspiracy theorists that the regular Armenian army practically did not participate in the war. Except, except, of course!
    2. Alena-Baku
      Alena-Baku 16 November 2020 00: 53 New
      -2
      Misconception Armenia participated in the war in full and the remaining soldiers are suckers by sending them there, they would become fur meat. Then Pashinyan would not have survived, but at least there is a chance.
  • KreAtiF
    KreAtiF 15 November 2020 23: 44 New
    +1
    Quote: rruvim
    Is there enough 1960 peacekeepers on this territory, provided that only two-thirds will be on guard. 25 Armenians (from the armies of the AR and NK) could not cope with this. Are 000 "light" armored personnel carriers enough? Something "flimsy" layer looms. Or is it some other "tricky" move of the Brigadier? What-to substitute these few units for the Turkish-Azerbaijani troops, like the Georgian troops in South Ossetia in August 90 and then increase the grouping tenfold?

    Behind them is the Caspian Flotilla and the Black Sea Fleet plus a base in Gyumri, this is enough so that no one would rock the boat.
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 15 November 2020 23: 57 New
      -2
      As my comrade says, and he is half a retired, he served his entire adult life on Frunzenskaya (I don't know what he did there) - Reuben! See the map! And you are watching! And tell me, how will the Black Sea Fleet and the Caspian Flotilla help the Ulyanovsk brigade in the event of an aggravation of the confrontation between our small contingent represented by one brigade of peacekeepers and, on the contrary, Turkish-Azerbaijani troops in the amount of 8 brigades and three divisions (five brigades)? The base of Gyumri, number of 4000 outside employees according to the list (70% of Armenians of both sexes) but not in fact can be added to our 1960s.
      1. Vitaly161
        Vitaly161 16 November 2020 01: 28 New
        0
        Is there any point in Azerbaijan to twitch at our peacekeepers? Our countries have a common border, if anything, or are they suicides? within XNUMX hours our army will already move to Baku, if Azerbaijan decides to self-cut
  • Scorpio05
    Scorpio05 16 November 2020 00: 44 New
    -2
    Quote: Mole
    Dear Bilal! Please do not "star"! A won battle does not mean victory in a war, especially with the support of outsiders. Tomorrow your opponent may receive such support, but at a much higher technical, tactical and strategic level.
    Born to trade - fights badly, and born to conquer - trades badly. Axiom!?

    They were bullied by their stupid, childish stereotypes. Therefore, all this geography was conquered in the Middle Ages, trading? The Armenians also stuffed their own heads with narcissistic nonsense, the fact that the ara turns out to be "great" warriors. And when it got tight, they ran whining to those whose flags were massively burned at the rallies. Born to trade))
  • Scorpio05
    Scorpio05 16 November 2020 00: 50 New
    -2
    Quote: North 2
    The 40 thousandth regular aria of Armenia was never taken out even from the barracks in places of constant
    deployment in Armenia. There is a lot of info about this on the internet.

    New Armenian myth)) with the light hand of the senile S. Kurginyan. Only for some reason the entire police of Armenia in Karabakh fought and suffered heavy losses. By the way, due to the absence of police in Yerevan, government agencies there could not protect against the crowd.
  • Scorpio05
    Scorpio05 16 November 2020 00: 57 New
    -2
    Quote: rruvim
    Well, this is now clear to everyone! Harutyunyan unequivocally hinted about this. And the footage of attempts to repulse "Shushi" from ANNA, where only two tanks and 30 volunteers in collector Fords add information to the conspiracy theorists that the regular Armenian army practically did not participate in the war. Except, except, of course!

    And the recent footage of the video with hundreds of killed Armenian servicemen around Shushi and on the entire Lachin-Shusha road is probably Martians? Did you dream of thousands of killed Armenian servicemen of the Armenian Armed Forces on the website of the Ministry of Defense of Armenia? By the way, a huge number of servicemen of the Armenian army (much more than killed) are listed as "missing" without a trace. Do not repeat the tales of the Armenian agitprop aimed at justifying your shameful defeat. Moreover ... All equipment (66 pieces only T 72 tanks of various modifications in excellent condition) taken as trophies by the Azerbaijani Armed Forces belonged to the Armed Forces of Armenia, and not to mythical militias or Stepanakert pensioners.
  • johnatan.kowalski
    johnatan.kowalski 16 November 2020 01: 00 New
    -8
    Bayraktars do not care which tanks to burn, Armenian t72 and s300 or rossiyskie, the experience they got oh-her what
  • Bilal
    Bilal 16 November 2020 06: 54 New
    -5
    Hey you, "Gentlemen, MINISTERS" ... Answer the question: If Russia recognizes Karabakh as Azerbaijani territory, then on what basis is the commander of the Russian peacekeeping forces in Nagorno-Karabakh, Lieutenant-General Rustam Muradov and First Deputy Military Prosecutor of the Southern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces, Colonel Dmitry Shuvarkin meet with HEAD OF SEPARATISTS, who at the same time discusses with them the humanitarian situation that has developed in Karabakh as a result "Azerbaijani aggression".
    1. V1er
      V1er 16 November 2020 08: 34 New
      0
      Quote: Bilal
      Answer the question: If Russia recognizes KARABAKH as an Azerbaijani territory,

      Do not recognize. You are transferred to the occupied regions (Karabakh security belt), Lachin, as well as the path to your enclave of Nakhichevan under the control of Russia. There were also obligations to unblock all roads and transport routes, which is also beneficial for logistics for all countries in the region. This alone suggests that the continuation of the conflict is not planned. Nobody gives Karabakh to you, most likely its status will remain undefined for some time (5 years for sure). Tell me, Azerbaijani, why build a road bypassing Shushi if they are going to give up Karabakh?
      Direct quote from the contract:
      Armenia up to 15 [approx. On November 1, 2020, the Kelbajar region was to be returned to Azerbaijan, and the Lachin region by December 1, 2020. The Lachin corridor (5 km wide), which will ensure the connection of Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia and at the same time will not affect the city of Shusha, remains under the control of the peacekeeping contingent of the Russian Federation. Within three years, a plan for the construction of a new traffic route along the Lachin corridor will be determined, providing a link between Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia, with the subsequent redeployment of the Russian peacekeeping contingent to guard this route. Azerbaijan guarantees the safety of traffic along the Lachin corridor of citizens, vehicles and goods in both directions.
      1. Bilal
        Bilal 16 November 2020 09: 13 New
        -3
        How does it not recognize if Russia is a member of the UN. And Azerbaijan too. And when Azerbaijan was accepted into the UN membership, Karabakh was recognized as the territory of Azerbaijan. And Russia too ...
        1. V1er
          V1er 16 November 2020 09: 16 New
          0
          You call everyone minus players, but you sculpt the cons only in this way) lol
      2. Bilal
        Bilal 16 November 2020 13: 08 New
        +1
        Tell me, Azeri, why build a road bypassing Shushi if they are going to give up Karabakh?


        Have you even looked at the map out of the corner of your eye? There are two roads there. The main one bypasses Shusha. And the corridor runs along this road ...
    2. kot423
      kot423 16 November 2020 08: 34 New
      +1
      Quote: Bilal
      then for what reason

      And on what basis are you interested?
      1. Bilal
        Bilal 16 November 2020 09: 16 New
        -2
        Based on the fact that the site is just a field for discussions ...
        1. kot423
          kot423 16 November 2020 10: 00 New
          +3
          And then a counter question: on what basis did you insult the honor of the Russian soldier in your comments and
          Russian peacekeepers in particular, allowing themselves to publicly declare that there were no REAL Russian peacekeepers before that?
          1. Bilal
            Bilal 16 November 2020 13: 01 New
            0
            Logic is lame ... It's not about the honor of the Russian soldier. Even a soldier who kills is honored because he is following orders. And without question.

            And with the Russian language, oddly enough, there is a problem ... If the word "for real" was written after "saw", you would be right. But alas and ahh ...
            And so that the world, for the first time really saw the PEACES OF RUSSIA ...
            1. kot423
              kot423 16 November 2020 13: 22 New
              +1
              Quote: Bilal
              Logic is lame ... It's not about the honor of the Russian soldier. Even a soldier who kills is honored because he is following orders. And without question.

              And with the Russian language, oddly enough, there is a problem ... If the word "for real" was written after "saw", you would be right. But alas and ahh ...
              And so that the world, for the first time really saw the PEACES OF RUSSIA ...

              This is your problem, you are on a Russian-speaking site. If you buy a normal translator - the toad crushes, their sea is in online format. Or banned on Google?
              1. Bilal
                Bilal 16 November 2020 13: 52 New
                0
                Dear, I meant you ... I wrote correctly. You read wrong ...
  • KreAtiF
    KreAtiF 16 November 2020 15: 31 New
    0
    Quote: rruvim
    As my comrade says, and he is half a retired, he served his entire adult life on Frunzenskaya (I don't know what he did there) - Reuben! See the map! And you are watching! And tell me, how will the Black Sea Fleet and the Caspian Flotilla help the Ulyanovsk brigade in the event of an aggravation of the confrontation between our small contingent represented by one brigade of peacekeepers and, on the contrary, Turkish-Azerbaijani troops in the amount of 8 brigades and three divisions (five brigades)? The base of Gyumri, number of 4000 outside employees according to the list (70% of Armenians of both sexes) but not in fact can be added to our 1960s.

    The fleets will support with pinpoint strikes on the command centers, I hope we will not discuss the range, after which the Marine Corps Brigade Kasp. Fl. Takes Baku. The Black Sea Fleet keeps Armenians, so does Gyumri. And in the appendage it performs the functions that Turkey would not climb. And yes you are right you need to look at the maps, take a look!
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 16 November 2020 17: 44 New
      -1
      The Marine Corps Brigade of the Caspian Flotilla is not even able to defend its base, let alone a million-strong Baku. There are more police officers in Baku than the number of the entire brigade.
  • Old26
    Old26 16 November 2020 21: 43 New
    0
    Quote: rruvim
    Why exaggerate? But the absence of even a tank battalion is alarming!

    Base 102 has both tank companies in the SMR and a separate tank battalion. In fact, 2 tank battalions will be enough for you, or do you need to transfer the tank battalion of the 15th brigade?

    Quote: rruvim
    If the Turkish-Azerbaijani troops decide that our peacekeeping contingent (miserable 1960 fighters and 90 armored personnel carriers) cannot protect the Azerbaijani settlers from the small arms of Armenian separatists, they will sweep away the Ulyanovsk brigade in a few days, but they will not sweep it away, they will simply send roadblocks (25 pieces of 50 fighters) to "quarantine". And who? Where from? Will they be released? The Armenian army will be gone! She was sent home. Moreover, a new region appeared in front of it - Kelbajar, flooded not by Azerbaijani settlers, but by the Azerbaijani army with Syrian settlers - Turkomen.

    Do not repeat nonsense about the Turkish-Azerbaijani troops. Aliyev is not stupid enough to blame Russia. Nothing Turkish troops, which there will not be solved. Enough to pull this horror story out into the white light again. The Armenian separatists can of course fire at the settlers. Nobody guarantees that this will not happen. As well as provocations from the Armenian side against our MS. But they did not ask what would happen to these separatists later. They will not be multiplied by our VP or MS, but Azerbaijani units will. In winter, they will be driven into the mountains and simply destroyed with the same drones, since these "separatists" cannot even start a fire. And let them spend the night at minus 20 in the mountains

    Will they sweep away the peacekeeping brigade in a few days? Who! Azerbaijanis - they will not do it. They won
    Can you imagine how many fighters are needed to quarantine 25 blocks of 50 fighters each ??? from the current situation. the Turks are not there. Armenian troops? They could not even cope with the Azerbaijani units, what will they do if a pair of 22M3 squadrons are "covered" over them ???
    And stop carrying this nonsense that Azerbaijan will fight with our peacekeepers ...
  • johnatan.kowalski
    johnatan.kowalski 17 November 2020 17: 16 New
    -1
    Now let the warriors remember about the deaths of the pilots and about the attitude towards them, why did they die for the fact that politicians have foreign currency accounts in foreign banks?