The United States worried about the possible use of Russian "Poseidons" during the war

The United States is concerned about Russia's development of Poseidon Unmanned Submersibles. As the US Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation Christopher Ford said, Washington doubts that the use of Poseidons during a military conflict will comply with international law.

Speaking at an online seminar hosted by the American Bar Association, Ford said the US "has reason to be apprehensive" about Russia's nuclear deterrence policy. The US doubts that the Russian nuclear weapon intended for defense only.

Of course, Russia claims that its doctrine is in line with international law, that its nuclear weapons are intended only for defense and deterrence and will only be used as a last resort. Hopefully it is

- he added.

Another development that arouses US concerns are the Poseidon unmanned underwater vehicles with a nuclear power plant and a nuclear warhead. According to Ford, the use of such devices does not comply with international law.

They are proposed to be equipped with nuclear warheads with a capacity of several megatons and launched into the ocean during a military conflict in order to unleash a radioactive tsunami on the coastal cities of the United States. Such a concept raises serious questions as to whether it can be applied in accordance with international legal norms and principles.

- he said.

Also, according to Ford, the United States is alarmed by Russia's statement that Moscow can respond with the use of nuclear weapons to any ballistic missile aimed at its territory, regardless of which charge is installed on it and regardless of where it is aimed.

Earlier, the US has already called on Russia to abandon its "terrible weapon." Billingsley, the US president's special envoy for arms control, said the development of Poseidon and the Burevestnik cruise missile is "a waste of time" since START "will ban them anyway."

Comments

[Hunter 2]

Well, I honestly doubt that this International Law exists ... and I am also worried!
Gathered "war" with Russia to arrange, then it is better to really worry, but if not, then there is nothing to worry about.

[Eragon]

Quote: Hunter 2

Well, I honestly doubt that this International Law exists ... and I am also worried!

The power of law is effective when it is secured by the law of power! I don’t remember who said it, but it’s very correct.

They are proposed to be equipped with nuclear warheads with a capacity of several megatons and launched into the ocean during a military conflict in order to unleash a radioactive tsunami on the coastal cities of the United States. Such a concept raises serious questions as to whether it can be applied in accordance with international legal norms and principles.

No, uncle, you will destroy us, and we will die in peace? The GDP clearly stated that there will be no planet without Russia. I’ll add, but without North America it’s easy.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: Eragon

No, uncle, you will destroy us, and we will die in peace? The GDP clearly stated that there will be no planet without Russia. I'll add on my own, but without North America, it's easy

And I remember Pan Volodaevsky - a master of fencing, distinguished by his small stature ... "If people are not afraid of you, they will laugh at you ..." That grin slipped from the striped snouts ...

[Machito]

The US may not be worried about the potential use of Poseidon. In the event of a nuclear war, the Poseidons will definitely be used, and the entire US coast and two-thirds of the population will be flushed into the ocean, like into a toilet bowl. The rest will be covered with ash by Yellowstone. There is nothing to worry about: the United States will be erased from the map. As far as "international law" is concerned, Russian weapons operate within the Russian legal framework.

[Voyager]

Shhh, you will call the kraken like that ... that is, Timokhin and he will start his hurdy-gurdy again about what a stupid idea this is!

[krot]

Washington doubts that the use of "Poseidons" during a military conflict will comply with international law

They made me laugh. In the United States, all killings by their country are in accordance with international law! What's inside the US, what's outside of it ..
I think we are moving in the right direction with the "Poseidons" and in which case, instead of America, there will be a strait named after Stalin! ))))

[Machito]

Timokhin has his own view of the development of the fleet, and I must say, he has many sound ideas. However, Sakharov's idea of ​​megatsunami on the US coast is a good horror story for ordinary people, and for the Pentagon, as well as a nuclear strike on Yellowstone. Perhaps the possibility of Russia inflicting unacceptable damage for the United States with small forces (20 Poseidons and 10 missiles for an American supervolcano) will cool many hotheads overseas who dream of a preemptive nuclear strike on the Russian Federation.

[Hermit21]

Rather, it is a means of combating AUG or SSBN and their bases within the UNV

[Uncle lee]

Sow the Don - reap the Ocean of the Tsunami!

[Baloo]

Quote: Hunter 2

Gathered "war" with Russia to arrange, then it's better

immediately surrender, smoke the wheelhouse and bury your tomogavki. Do you remember Hitler?

[smart ass]

Ahaha international law))))) tell it to Syria, Libya, Yugoslavia, Iraq. A pack of wolves is afraid only of a hunter with a shotgun))

[Starover_Z]

Quote: Clever man

Ahaha international law))))) tell it to Syria, Libya, Yugoslavia, Iraq. A pack of wolves is afraid only of a hunter with a shotgun))

Exactly ! You, gentlemen from the States, print your concern in Japanese newspapers! They will agree with you!

[Borik]

Yes, even if you launch a simple rocket into the territory of another country, you've already violated international law. And for amers to release fifty of these missiles or bombing a country is like blowing your nose. How to threaten someone with low-power nuclear charges is like promising to donate a couple of hundred million for charity. And if someone warns them that if they decide to unleash such an innocent little war, then immediately receive from the bottom of their hearts. So let them first think for themselves, is it worth it to violate this international law, which they put at nothing, since they have invented their own stars and stripes for themselves.

[common man]

Quote: Hunter 2

Well, I honestly doubt that this International Law exists ..

But why? International law is the right of the United States to do whatever it pleases. And it exists. At least THEY think so.

[NEXUS]

Washington doubts that the use of "Poseidons" during a military conflict will comply with international law.

So I think their brains have dried up there, or only through every second? What are the international rights during the war?
Let them talk about rights, in the context of the bombings of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the burning of Vietnam with napalm, the financing of color revolutions, the destruction of more than 2 million people in Iraq, the bombing of Mosul, etc. ... except for Trump, all US presidents unleashed wars and something in Washington did not stink about human rights.

[Cube123]

Quote: NEXUS

Let them talk about rights, in the context of the bombings of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the burning of Vietnam with napalm, the financing of color revolutions, the destruction of more than 2 million people in Iraq, the bombing of Mosul, etc. ... except for Trump, all US presidents unleashed wars and something in Washington did not stink about human rights.

The essence of Anglo-Saxon politics is expressed in the famous phrase

Therefore, the only way to maintain normal relations with them is not to give them the slightest reason to think that they were able to muzzle you.

[Alex Nevs]

After HIROSHIMA NAGASAKI, you don't even have to listen to them ... whoever speaks.

[Ros 56]

Do not worry striped, everything will happen very quickly, you will not have time to get scared.

[impostor]

They should not confuse international law with American

[Olgovich]

Such a concept raises serious questions as to whether it can be applied in accordance with international legal norms and principles.

Are there international norms for the use of nuclear weapons?

No more than 1 mgt per city? Or how?

[sergo1914]

Quote: Olgovich

Such a concept raises serious questions as to whether it can be applied in accordance with international legal norms and principles.

Are there international norms for the use of nuclear weapons?

No more than 1 mgt per city? Or how?

American cities are not allowed. For all the rest - you can.

[VORON538]

They call it “but what for us?” After all, American missiles and bombs bring democracy.
"the whole world" knows

[Cat]

Or how?

Will they file a lawsuit?
The defendant will have to drop 1 mt, as required by law, and another 1 for moral damage.

[zadorin1974]

And you shouldn't have doubted Olgovich! Herosima, Nagosaki, white phosphorus in Belgrade - all within the framework of mattress for foreign concepts

[Xnumx vis]

"The development, causing concern to the United States, are the Poseidon unmanned underwater vehicles with a nuclear power plant and a nuclear warhead. According to Ford, the use of such devices does not comply with international law." what they are boiling about .. Poseidon and Vanguard are all Russian-Putin cartoons. Bad quality cartoons In their own words! And here many proved the uselessness of Poseidon! It turns out to be USEFUL!

[Ryaruav]

what international law can the Yankees talk about, they themselves trampled everything

[Poetry]

Let them send lawyers. If they survive.

[Alexander X]

Now let the striped ones express their concern ... Not all our Foreign Ministry can do this ...
The best confirmation of the reality of "cartoons" is precisely the dissatisfaction of the striped ... IMHO ...

[Jacket in stock]

The United States is alarmed by Russia's statement that Moscow can respond with the use of nuclear weapons to any ballistic missile aimed at its territory,

Those. I really want to shoot across the territory of Russia, but I really don't want to get an answer.
Of course, retaliating against America is clearly against international law.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Jacket in stock

Those. I really want to shoot across the territory of Russia, but I really don't want to get an answer.

Naturally! And yet they just start to get feverish from the "ghostly" Poseidons, because ...

Washington doubts that the use of Poseidons during a military conflict will comply with international law.

Because American international law is when I feel good, but there is no grass. So they whined: "Why do we need it?"

[Cube123]

Quote: ROSS 42

Because American international law is when I feel good, but there is no grass. So they whined: "Why do we need it?"

"Gentlemen play by the rules while they win. When gentlemen start to lose, they change the rules."

[Cron]

International law is the US right to destroy any country with impunity

[NEXUS]

Quote: Cron

International law is the US right to destroy any country with impunity

And many countries are armed and can fight back. What kind of Washington dumbbell would like this?

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: NEXUS

And many countries are armed and can fight back.

And if the countries unite in a particular case and fight back - which one

Quote: NEXUS

WASHINGTON MUTO WILL LIKE THIS?

[Jacket in stock]

the US has "reason to be apprehensive" about Russia's nuclear deterrence policy. In the USA they doubt

Containment is what it is.
Should restrain from the desire to fight.

[YOUR]

It is strange that they were concerned.
Their usual state - and we are for what

[kot423]

Washington doubts that the use of Poseidons during a military conflict will comply with international law.

In the war, such rights are denounced (WWII, or even better to remind mattresses about napalm in Vietnam, white phosphorus, depleted uranium in Yugoslavia, etc.)
Conclusion - let them get hysterical and shake on, this is good.

[rotmistr60]

Washington doubts that the use of Poseidons during a military conflict will comply with international law.

So I had to remember about the existence of international law. Does delivering a nuclear strike against Russia, and even a preventive one, fit into this right? Cynicism is off the charts.

[_Ugene_]

Such a concept raises serious questions as to whether it can be applied in accordance with international legal norms and principles.

and the military conflict against Russia, therefore, will comply with international legal norms and principles? rzhach

[sleeve]

Yes, there is a subject for concern. This fool does not care that under aug, that in the harbor of New York "to be realized" ...

[sleeve]

If voynushka, then MP is more like a "machine gun" than anything else.

[faterdom]

I am failing ... Slavik, I'm getting a point ...
Can you try not to create conflicts?

[Cube123]

Quote: faterdom

Can you try not to create conflicts?

This is impossible for them. Nice quote to dot the i:

“We have 50 percent of the world's wealth, but only 6,3 percent of the population ... In this situation, we inevitably turn into an object of envy and indignation. Our true task in the coming period is to develop a system of relations that will allow us to maintain this inequality ... For this we will have to part with all sentimentality and fantasies; our attention everywhere should be focused on our immediate national tasks ... We need to stop talking about vague and ... unrealistic goals, such as human rights, improving living standards, democratization. The day is not far off when we will have to resort to brute force. The less ideological slogans hinder us at such a moment, the better. "
Nobel laureate Noam Chomsky
book "How the World Works"

[APASUS]

What is not a question, then all compliance with the norms of international law. When did the norms of international law interest the Americans? When they bombed Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, invaded Afghanistan, or these norms began to interest when their country could be directly affected.
Two-faced bastards

[maiman61]

International law excludes American law!

[storm]

The one who is stronger and the RIGHTS, here is the only rule that worked and is valid ...
Start a war, get POSITION OF POSEIDON on both coasts ...

[zxc15682]

There will be infection, but there will be no tsunami. The whole point is that the charge will explode after the end of the war.

[Gennady Fomkin]

Always jarred on the phrase "Civilized countries" or "Civilized world" ... these are those countries that are essentially the last creatures, had colonies, massacred the local population.

[Gennady Fomkin]

Shoot rockets.

Marry Rockefeller to Buzovaya, and Rothschild to Sobchak.

Shut off the gas.

Hire Mongolian cavalry and take Lisbon.

Send ten battle mages of at least master level.

Suddenly crash the dollar.

Stop the Gulf Stream.

Shut off oil.

Make a revolution in Texas.

Make the ruble the world currency.

Collapse the euro.

Call Grandfather Frost.

Sued them in the Basmanny Court.

To deprive the Olympics.

Close the straits.

Set the Ukrainians and Moldovans against them.

Collapse oil prices.

Join the Bilderberg Club.

Become the head of the WTO.

Scold them.

Impose sanctions and prohibit visiting the mausoleum.

Bribe them.

Bribe China.

Get offended.

 

[dsdelta]

Especially about Buzova liked it. ))

[Boa kaa]

Dear!
Take a sedative and stop raving ...
Oh! Yes, you have a fever!

[dzvero]

Shame on you Copy it as a carbon copy, change it slightly and issue it as an original guide to the spread of the enemy There are no apologists for copyright protection ...

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Gennady Fomkin

Marry Rockefeller to Buzovaya, and Rothschild to Sobchak.

Quote: dsdelta

Especially about Buzova liked it. ))

Aha! ...
Divorce Sobchak and marry them with Buzova, and Rockefeller with Rothschild ...

[Gate68]

Insanity grows stronger

[KreAtiF]

A strange general, such weapons will ban START 3, but who will sign it in this case, or did they come up with it themselves, signed it themselves, and then they will roll a barrel to Russia?

[Charik]

during a military conflict will comply with the norms of international law. - already funny

[Charik]

In the United States, they doubt that Russian nuclear weapons are intended only for defense. -Ah-ah - !!! of the West, they are not rightfully fighting internationally

[dsdelta]

No matter how funny. All weapons that the United States lacks violate international law. And when they have similar ones, they will immediately stop violating. )

[bar]

Washington doubts that the use of Poseidons during a military conflict will comply with international law.

Are they serious? About "international legal norms" in a nuclear war?

[Yuri Rastegaev]

Who would talk about international law, but not "cowboys". Their hands are covered in blood up to the elbows and scammed under all international treaties

[Gennady Fomkin]

Quote: BoA KAA

Dear!
Take a sedative and stop raving ...
Oh! Yes, you have a fever!

castor oil to write

[blackcat]

And I am concerned about their concern, because as soon as they have nothing to worry about, they will unleash a nuclear war.

[codetalker]

It seemed to me that the war of one state with another no longer fits into international law ...

[K-50]

The United States is concerned about Russia's development of the Poseidon Unmanned Submersibles.

As you lose the "shores in your head", so we "Poseidon" will help you lose them in reality!

[iouris]

All agreements have been cleared. It is necessary to teach "partners" to live "according to the rules", according to their own. Otherwise, their "red arrows" have long crossed our "red lines". Stalin launched a war with Finland to move the border away from Leningrad, in much better conditions than today.

[evgen1221]

Well, these are always judged by themselves. That is, having such a weapon themselves, for them there would be no morally legal questions about the use of the first even in response. And the first rather.

[musorg]

Are they delusional? In time of war, to comply with the law? And what does the war itself correspond to?

[2 Level Advisor]

Are there any principles for the use of nuclear weapons to comply with them? didn’t hear something ..

[comradChe]

There will be no war. One field of berries. They will agree on how to lie in the basket.

[Egor53]

"According to Ford, the use of such devices does not comply with international law."
Comrade Ford is absolutely crazy! How can a nuclear bombing of any country be consistent with "international law"?
We are scared of Poseidons as hell, because the use of these torpedoes can destroy 1/3 of the US population at one time. And the United States will never have protection from Poseidons.

[pipetro]

Oh, the United States remembered about international legal norms and principles. How long?

[mikstepanenko]

Logically - these savages despicably fired at our plane, which peacefully bombed their city.

[Serg 122]

So these are "cartoons" all, why be afraid of them ?! Strange people - at first they laugh at us, they say we scare them with "cartoons", and then they start shaking from fear and declare all sorts of sanctions ...

[U-58]

The author of such statements is simply making a political career.
And it's a no brainer that the results of the use of such weapons will exclude the existence of the concept of "law" as such

[spectr]

As the US Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation Christopher Ford said, Washington doubts that the use of Poseidons during a military conflict will comply with international law.

It turns out that the military conflict itself can comply with the norms of international law, if certain types of weapons are not used, i.e. standards are being developed (or developed), on the basis of which one state by force can absorb the second state.
The world is changing fun. And it seems that he is getting closer to the third world war.

[Incvizitor]

Against the modern fascist West, all means are good as against fascist Germany, then they did not think about means and now they do not need to, and biological and chemical and nuclear weapons against them the more the better.

[Whirlwind]

Let them themselves end the biological war against humanity with deadly viruses that they are developing in their 200 biological laboratories around the world and are already being godlessly and inhumanely using, including against the people of Russia.

[Vasyan1971]

Ford said the US "has reason to be apprehensive" about Russia's nuclear deterrence policy.

Highlikely in all its glory!

[ZAV69]

Something tells me that Mr. Ford should be chased for incompetence. If it comes to special ammunition, then you can forget about legal norms. Doesn't he understand this?

[nod739]

If there is a war with the use of nuclear weapons, the concept of international law will disappear as such.
We are peaceful people, but our armored president stands .. You know where ...

[Dzafdet]

Compliant. It's okay. You attacked and got hit on the head. This applies to countries such as the USA, Japan, Turkey, China, Norway and England. Let's arrange a big badabum for you ...

[Klingon]

Holy shit! Before p..., (showing concerns), you should think for yourself whether what the United States is doing is consistent with international standards? starting wars and civil strife, killing people with folding blades, spraying chemicals, etc.

[sharp-lad]

The inhabitants of the Strain named after Stalin were getting into something.

[Klingon]

Quote: Dzafdet

Compliant. It's okay. You attacked and got hit on the head. This applies to countries such as the USA, Japan, Turkey, China, Norway and England. Let's arrange a big badabum for you ...

Canada and Australia should not be forgotten. -this is also an Anglo-Saxon Caudlo

[sharp-lad]

Pirates have only one right - the right to hang out on the yardarm!

[TatarinSSSR]

What the hell is international law when a country is being hit with nuclear weapons? There is no longer time for the right, the main thing there is to have time to launch the response. In order to wipe out the busurman from the face of the earth.

[lvov_aleksey]

Are they woodpeckers or something like this? All the agreements on land were in place, but the sea was not touched at all!!!!
p.s. If he doesn’t understand, don’t bother!!!!!!!!!!! Otherwise, the Aircraft Carriers would have gone to waste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[lvov_aleksey]

According to the agreement between Russia and the United States, data is exchanged on the state of nuclear arsenals. According to the US State Department[121], as of March 1, 2013, the US armed forces had 766 deployed strategic offensive weapons, including intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) ​​and heavy bombers; versus 499 deployed in Russia.

When calculating nuclear charges, it turns out that the United States has 1654 nuclear warheads on various carriers, compared to 1480 for Russia.

In total, the United States currently has 930 deployed and non-deployed strategic offensive weapons, compared to 816 in Russia.

conclusion: I voiced that the article was rubbish, but in the end - “stars and stripes” why are they afraid of “Poseidon”

[aszzz888]

The United States worried about the possible use of Russian "Poseidons" during the war

Did they (merikatos) think this was a Christmas tree decoration? Or is it still cartoons for them?

[VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK]

It's good to be afraid!

[roofing hedgehog]

..international law...??? this is what those who constantly started wars and organized them all over the world say... they are so stupid that they don’t even understand what they are talking about... treat and only treat... yes, even with “Poycedon”

[ZEMCH]

Such a concept raises serious questions as to whether it can be applied in accordance with international legal norms and principles.

That is, to attack the country is to comply with the norms, but to receive a “response”, and “what are we for”!

[Vadim Golubkov]

Well, yes, but bombing Serbia with uranium shells and children, and bombing Iraq with hospitals, civilians and children, and in Vietnam pouring chemicals on the country, this is in accordance with international law.....here.