Lavrov: There will be no Turkish peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh

66
Lavrov: There will be no Turkish peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh

Turkish peacekeepers will not participate in the peacekeeping mission in Nagorno-Karabakh along with the Russian military. This was stated by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

According to Lavrov, there will be no Turkish peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh, observers from Turkey will be able to be present only in the joint ceasefire control center in Nagorno-Karabakh, which will be located on the territory of Azerbaijan.



No peacekeeping units of the Turkish Republic will be sent to Nagorno-Karabakh. This is clearly stated in the leaders' statement. As for the statements in the parliament (Turkey) that they will work on the same grounds as the Russians, we are talking exclusively about the very center, which will be permanently, without any visiting missions, located on the territory of Azerbaijan

- said Lavrov.

The Foreign Minister stressed that the activities of Turkish observers will be limited to the Russian-Turkish center to control the ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh, which is being created in Azerbaijan.

The Center will operate exclusively remotely, using technical controls, including Drones, which allow determining the situation on the ground in Karabakh and determining which side is observing and which is violating the ceasefire

- he added.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    66 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +6
      12 November 2020 16: 12
      and how many speculations)))
      1. +14
        12 November 2020 16: 15
        I don’t know how, but I believe in Sergei Viktorovich hi
        1. +5
          12 November 2020 16: 25
          I believe too. Turks are and will be on the territory of Azerbaijan. They can visit Karabakh under escort. I apologize - under the protection of Our Peacekeepers. wink
          1. -13
            12 November 2020 16: 57
            Quote: Hunter 2
            I believe too. Turks are and will be on the territory of Azerbaijan. They can visit Karabakh under escort. I apologize - under the protection of Our Peacekeepers. wink

            Naturally, there is, if the authorities began to justify themselves so abruptly .. Erdogan would not have given such support to Aliyev so easily .. In the course of the matter in Azerbaijan, they will be scammed to keep Russia in good shape .. So everything is still ahead!
            1. +7
              12 November 2020 17: 29
              Quote: Turanov
              Naturally there is, if the authorities began to justify themselves so abruptly

              Whose power and to whom is it justified? And what is it justified for?
              1. -10
                12 November 2020 18: 07
                Quote: Jura
                Quote: Turanov
                Naturally there is, if the authorities began to justify themselves so abruptly

                Whose power and to whom is it justified? And what is it justified for?

                Well, not yours, of course, but OUR .. laughing I understood you correctly, you are one of the "eternally dissatisfied"?
                1. +4
                  12 November 2020 18: 39
                  Well ours, it's clear, so before whom is it justified and in what? And further - on the contrary, I here have a reputation for putinoid and uryakalka truth has not yet been called, but the fact that I am not in the ranks of the eternally whining is for sure.
                  1. -1
                    12 November 2020 19: 19
                    Quote: Jura
                    Well ours, it's clear, so before whom is it justified and in what? And further - on the contrary, I here have a reputation for putinoid and uryakalka truth has not yet been called, but the fact that I am not in the ranks of the eternally whining is for sure.

                    Well sorry Yuri hi The check was .. It's hard to trust someone now soldier
                    PS And we in Russia like to make excuses to the West now, unlike the USSR, that's OUR problem in politics! hi
                    1. +3
                      12 November 2020 19: 34
                      Quote: Turanov
                      Well, sorry Yuri hi The check was .. It's hard to trust someone now soldier
                      PS And we in Russia like to make excuses to the West now, unlike the USSR, that's OUR problem in politics!
                      Now the positions are clear, I also misunderstood you. On the fact of your comment, it happens of course what you said and not rarely, but in this case, against the background of numerous insinuations in the world media and the network about the presence of our and Turkish troops in the Caucasus, Lavrov just talked about how it really is so that there are no more speculations on this topic, the number of which is off scale, so at least it seems to me. hi
                      1. -1
                        12 November 2020 19: 46
                        Quote: Jura
                        Lavrov simply talked about how it really is, so that there would be no more speculations on this topic, the number of which is off scale, at least I see it.

                        Perhaps it is .. I see it skidded at the turn))) hi
                        Okay, Yuri realized his mistake. Let's continue working! soldier
                2. The comment was deleted.
        2. -3
          12 November 2020 17: 02
          And what kind of drones? Bayraktar?
      2. -2
        12 November 2020 16: 20
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        and how many speculations)))

        yes ash stump that will not.
        otherwise, no Pashinyan would have signed the agreement.
        1. +5
          12 November 2020 16: 30
          Quote: Halpat
          Quote: Nastia Makarova
          and how many speculations)))

          yes ash stump that will not.
          otherwise, no Pashinyan would have signed the agreement.

          Judging by the fact that he actually surrendered Karabakh, he would not have signed such an agreement, if only something remained for the Armenians in Karabakh.
          In words, he is a hero, but as the smell of fried, in the sense of resignation for the surrender of Karabakh, immediately transferred all the arrows to the peacekeepers, i.e. Russia, and now he started talking about the fact that the recognition of Karabakh as an independent state is in its priorities.
          The miserable creature will shit on us and our peacekeepers.
      3. +2
        12 November 2020 16: 24
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        and how many speculations)))

        No, not speculation. Targeted stuffing. In this topic, we will not see local detractors, I'm ready to argue.
        1. +5
          12 November 2020 17: 11
          Quote: matRoss
          Quote: Nastia Makarova
          and how many speculations)))

          No, not speculation. Targeted stuffing. We will not see local detractors in this topic, ready to argue.

          Yesterday here "Leshy" was proving that the Turks would keep a bump there and that the "Zaputins" should repent and accordingly repent, but it’s like that - the Turks were only designated there, without the ability to influence the weather.
          1. +1
            12 November 2020 18: 06
            And what, Turkey once claimed to have its servicemen in the NKR? Did I miss something? Share a link, pliz.
            Erdogan has entered the territory of Azerbaijan legally. Those. to the territory of the post-Soviet space, which has always been the zone of influence of Russia and no one else. In any case, this is how the staff telepropagandists presented the geopolitical alignment to us.
            Now it suddenly turns out that a part of this space, which has always been under the influence of the Russian Federation, was suddenly stepped by an adversary from a NATO member country.
            To see a certain strategic victory for Russia here, one must be a super cheers-patriot. Or blind.
            1. +4
              12 November 2020 18: 20
              Quote: Cosm22
              And what, Turkey once claimed to have its servicemen in the NKR? Did I miss something? Share a link, pliz............. To see here a certain strategic win for Russia you have to be a super patriot.

              Yes it is possible without "pliz". No. Stupid - rummage on YouTube at night signing by Putin and Aliyev, the agreement on the cessation of hostilities, where Aliyev talks about Turkey's participation in the peacekeeping operation. The meaning of what he said was that this event will be joint, with the participation of Ankara and Moscow. In fact, we see a slightly different functionality in the participation of the Turkish side, which does not correspond to the declared one. So SHTY, in order to objectively assess the current alignment and alignment of forces, there is absolutely no need to suffer "super-patriotism". This is simply obvious, at least to most, with a few exceptions like you. hi
              1. -5
                12 November 2020 20: 03
                I am not interested in what, where and when Mr. Aliyev stated.
                I ask, where and when did Erdogan say this? He stated the following - "Turkey will take part in the process of monitoring and observing the observance of the agreements on Karabakh." Currently, on the territory of Azerbaijan (the size of which, by the way, today can be interpreted in a broader sense, taking into account the latest agreements).
                I hope you understand the difference between the two leaders of states? And what do they sometimes say out of tune? And the fact that it is not necessary to attribute the words of one leader to another?
                But how can one still interpret the great victory of Russia if a NATO member country enters the territory of a state that directly borders on the Russian Federation? Is it such a multi-move? Can you explain its meaning?
                1. -3
                  13 November 2020 07: 44
                  NATO is already on all borders, so there is nothing to worry about
          2. -1
            12 November 2020 18: 14
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Yesterday here "Leshy" was proving that the Turks would keep a bump there and that the "Zaputins" should repent and repent accordingly,

            The wave went libre Dmitry! The worse it is for Russia, the better and more satisfying it becomes for them to live ...
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            and it won’t be so - the Turks there only indicated their presence, without the ability to influence the weather.

            So yes, but in Azerbaijan they are now masters and provocations will still be sure .. Here Russia needs to behave harshly, if we do not want more losses, like "accidentally and forgive me" ... hi
            33 pro-Turkish militants were recently soaked in the Idlib region, it may be reflected here .. This is what the problem will be in the future.
            1. +5
              12 November 2020 19: 03
              Quote: Turanov
              33 pro-Turkish militants were recently soaked in the Idlib region, it may be reflected here .. This is what the problem will be in the future.

              Before that, about two weeks ago, a camp for the preparation of "bearded tourists" was rolled out in the same place together with the headquarters of the HTS, through which Turkish financing of all controlled groups went, when up to 100 militants and 13 field commanders were killed. It seems that Erdogan understood that the provocation in the zone of interests of Russia would be followed by a tangible "exchange of pleasantries" in the zone of interests of Ankara.
      4. +1
        12 November 2020 16: 32
        The Foreign Minister stressed that the activities of Turkish observers will be limited to the Russian-Turkish center to control the ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh, which is being created in Azerbaijan.

        using technical means of control, including drones, which make it possible to determine the situation on the ground in Karabakh

        Turks on the territory of Azerbaijan, also with their drones over Karabakh.
      5. +1
        12 November 2020 18: 18


        So it remains to be wondered.
        1. +1
          12 November 2020 19: 07
          Quote: Alena-Baku


          So it remains to be wondered.

          Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov is out of politics, while politics is out of him. laughing For how long? winked
          1. +1
            13 November 2020 04: 29
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov is out of politics, while politics is out of him. laughing For how long?

            He would still have nuclear charges with missiles, like Kim's - the greatest would be Khan / Shah / Padishah / Sultan (insert the necessary) and no one would touch him.
      6. 0
        12 November 2020 22: 52
        Lavrov said Lavrov did!)
    2. +1
      12 November 2020 16: 17
      These bandits generally have to be driven from everywhere, they were completely dismissed.
      1. +4
        12 November 2020 16: 29
        Who will expel them from Azerbaijan? Just news, the Turks are going to build a railway to Karabakh.
        1. 0
          12 November 2020 16: 37
          From Libya to Syria, to begin with later, as appropriate.
          1. +1
            12 November 2020 17: 31
            Quote: Incvizitor
            From Libya to Syria to start

            How is it going?
            1. +2
              12 November 2020 22: 40
              The Turks were not engaged in peacekeeping anywhere. Play on words - and Lavrov can be "trusted." bully
        2. +5
          12 November 2020 17: 58
          And through where will they start making it? Through Armenia or along Iran? There was a road there, and even that one was taken away.
          So in 1987, we stood near that road for a couple of days, grass, birds and trains did not blow.
        3. +2
          12 November 2020 18: 07
          Quote: ASAD
          Who will expel them from Azerbaijan? Just news, the Turks are going to build a railway to Karabakh.

          Interesting! This road will have to be built according to the standards of our track, in order to exclude the transshipment of cargo from wagons with a different wheelset width, because The railway from Baku to Georgia (Caucasian Transsib) was built under the tsar and was shamanic under the USSR. I wonder what the Turkish standard is? After the Armenian-Azerbaijani notoriety in the 90s, something in the region of 100 km. tracks were dismantled and this route did not work. So its restoration would be in the interests of all countries in this region including Russia, Iran, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Georgia and .... the same Armenia. If the Turks fit into the restoration, then for sure, after that, for many years to come, they will have their own gain from the transshipment of goods, which most likely we will not be able to influence because this section will now be under the control of Azerbaijan. winked
          1. 0
            12 November 2020 18: 22
            That's what I'm talking about, if I understood correctly, then we are not invited to this holiday!
            1. +2
              12 November 2020 18: 36
              Quote: ASAD
              That's what I'm talking about, if I understood correctly, then we are not invited to this holiday!

              Apparently yes, tk. this area falls under the jurisdiction of Azerbaijan, which will prefer (and may be obliged) to give this "bun" to Ankara as an alaverda for the support provided in the Karabakh battle. There is nothing to show here if the already signed ceasefire document does not provide for any other status for this territory. But it’s probably impossible to foresee everything. In principle, this practice is in keeping with the spirit of the times. Damascus, in turn, made statements that all the priorities for projects related to the restoration of the energy and transport complex will be given to Russia, and infrastructure to China and Iran. The countries participating on the side of the coalition against Syria will not receive a single contract. So it is quite possible to assume that in this case Turkey snatched its piece of the cake from the conflict.
              1. -1
                13 November 2020 04: 40
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                So it is quite possible to assume that in this case Turkey snatched its piece of the pie from the conflict.

                Another part of this pie, apparently, will be Turkish ports in the Caspian and ferries to Central Asia. Azerbaijan joyfully and widely opened to the Turks ... um ... the gates of expansion to the East. (I didn’t say a little dirty talk)
    3. +2
      12 November 2020 16: 18
      there will be no Turkish peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh

      Binoed to help them ...
      ......
      1. +4
        12 November 2020 17: 01
        Binoed to help them ...

        wassat
        Binoculars! I wanted to write ... well, what happened ... laughing
    4. -1
      12 November 2020 16: 18
      And they have nothing to do there!
    5. +4
      12 November 2020 16: 21
      Well, as I said a couple of days in another thread. Only our peacekeepers will be in Karabakh, and the Turks will not be allowed into the ceasefire control center.
      Well, in this center outside of Karabakh, anyone can watch.
      1. -1
        13 November 2020 02: 30
        in this center outside Karabakh
        Somewhere on Mount Ararat, or even better in Istanbul.
    6. +3
      12 November 2020 16: 22
      Well, what, in remote mode, the Turks are good at drones.
    7. -1
      12 November 2020 16: 25
      RF is ready for provocations from the Turks ???? Why did the Turks in vain send their Inhatebs there from Syria?
      1. 0
        13 November 2020 02: 27
        Is Russia ready for Turkish provocations?
        Our main enemy is the United States, and we are preparing for war with it, just as they are with us.
        ---
        And the Turks have to answer for themselves one question: how many YARs do you need so that there is no Turkey?
        Let them count. bully
    8. -4
      12 November 2020 16: 30
      Antiresno, but will there be sanctions for Azerbaijan's aggression? If not, we, on the same grounds, can take all the former republics and some stubborn Europopers back.
    9. +5
      12 November 2020 16: 36
      It has already been said to the Turks - read the trilateral agreement, preferably aloud, and with expression! It clearly states that military peacekeepers will only be from Russia, so to speak, our exclusive priority over the Turks! And, no one forbids them to dream, even if in their dreams they even introduce their military into the USA. ..
      1. +1
        13 November 2020 04: 46
        Quote: Thrifty
        It clearly states that military peacekeepers will only be from Russia, so to speak, our exclusive priority over the Turks! And, no one forbids them to dream, even if in their dreams they even introduce their military into the USA. ..

        Why do the Turks need peacekeepers? They can deploy at least a couple of armies there (outside Karabakh). Not necessarily peacekeeping, but quite the opposite ... A sovereign and independent (or independent, I don’t know how it’s right) Azerbaijan can place anyone it wants on its territory. He can even support these armies at his own expense, like the Poles of the Americans. And from this they will only squeal proudly and joyfully, like the same Poles. So, soon the Turks, as owners, will overwhelm everything there.
    10. -2
      12 November 2020 16: 50
      It turns out that Aliyev and Erdogan are "balabols"? It's hard to believe.
      Time will tell
      1. +4
        12 November 2020 17: 01
        Matcubus - they are dreamers, the euphoria of victory does not allow logical comprehension of what was written in the treaty, which was signed at the end of the war!
      2. 0
        12 November 2020 17: 01
        it's even technically impossible to do it. the peacekeeping mission is managed by the center of the RF Ministry of Defense. at the briefing yesterday, the head of the General Staff Directorate arranged everything clearly and on the shelves for the most stubborn. there are no Turkish peacekeepers in the agreement either. so yes-stars.
        1. 0
          12 November 2020 19: 21
          I cannot understand one thing, but why do the Turks need this gemmorrhoid in this security zone? What will they get there so pleasant?
          1. +1
            13 November 2020 02: 18
            why do the Turks even need this hemorrhoid in this security zone
            For the sake of this "gemmoroy" the Anglo-Saxons turned them from the secular path of development towards the neo-Ottoman (or Pan-Turkist) path.
            We can say that now it is their fate. Moreover, unenviable.
            The Anglo-Saxons have no time to wait, and therefore Turkey will be thrown into battle (the last one for Turkey) soon, the clock is ticking.
            I am afraid they will pull Azerbaijan along with them, if the latter does not get rid of them.
      3. +1
        12 November 2020 17: 57
        Aliyev certainly does not need the Turks ...
        1. +1
          13 November 2020 04: 47
          Quote: nobody75
          Aliyev certainly does not need the Turks ...

          ... But you have to ...
    11. +1
      12 November 2020 16: 59
      And then ..! Morons .... laughing
    12. +2
      12 November 2020 17: 01
      Is Turkey a peacemaker? Aha let the goat into the garden ... negative
    13. +9
      12 November 2020 17: 02
      calm people, calm. now they will prove to us on our fingers that Lavrov has confused something there. and the glorious Turkish peacekeepers are already settling in the checkpoint in Stepanokert.
      1. -3
        12 November 2020 17: 12
        all messed up. ) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the President) here everyone knows everyone much better than them)))
    14. -2
      12 November 2020 17: 17
      ... or maybe they will.
    15. 0
      12 November 2020 17: 35
      Ahhah)) This is how a face about the table of those who claim that Turks and Azeris will rule in Karabakh))
      All Turkish observers are escorted, under the close supervision of Russian troops))
    16. +2
      12 November 2020 17: 52
      Intentions and reality always diverge. Finally, nothing has "settled down" yet.
      1. 0
        12 November 2020 17: 58
        It was established - a no-fly zone over Karabakh ... "The prank succeeded"
    17. 0
      12 November 2020 20: 17
      “We have every reason to believe that everything that happened to him in terms of the penetration of chemical warfare agents into his body could have happened in Germany or on an airplane where he was loaded and taken to the Charite clinic,” the Russian Foreign Minister said.

      He himself violated carbohydrate metabolism in order to faint, then the damned nemchura got a chance to poison the parasite.
    18. 0
      12 November 2020 21: 34
      but it is not exactly)))
    19. 0
      13 November 2020 02: 06
      Lavrov: There will be no Turkish peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh
      Turks and peacekeepers are not compatible things. When and where were the Turks peacekeepers?
      Where the Turks are, there is war.
      Today's Turkey is a martyr state created by the Anglo-Saxons, created for war.
      Two, maximum three years and Turkey will not be, from the word at all.
      Perhaps Kurdistan will emerge in place of Turkey.
      ---
      Entering allied relations with Turkey is the same as signing oneself a verdict.
    20. 0
      13 November 2020 10: 21
      The mercenary is trying to push Turkish peacekeepers there.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"