"Cossacks bow to nobody": about the history and traditions of the Cossacks

150

Don Cossacks, Kuban, Terek, Ural (Yaik) and Ussuri Cossacks. In the vastness of the vast country, there are many Cossack communities, many of which were formed more than 4 centuries ago.

Today, at the word Cossack, modern people often have mixed feelings. On the one hand - wonderful Soviet films, the exploits of the Cossacks during the Patriotic War of 1812, the Great Patriotic War. On the other hand, there are also dark pages stories Cossacks - persecution in the first years of the formation of Soviet power, the hostility hidden towards this power on the part of a considerable number of Cossacks of the same Don - the transfer of such councils, which did not forgive the power and actually did not accept it, to the side of the Nazis.



But in general, the history of the Cossacks is in many ways the history of our entire country. This is the history of traditions, way of life, the Orthodox faith. Therefore, both victories and failures must be comprehended in a single historical context, without trying to look at one thing openly, and at the other through one's fingers, reluctantly.

Cossack proverb:

Cossacks do not bow to anyone.

It contains an understanding of the Cossack's love for will, but, what is important, not for permissiveness.

The film by Arkady Mamontov on his YouTube channel provides information about the history and traditions of the Cossacks, about how and how the Cossacks live today:

  • Facebook / Cossack Army Society "The Great Don Host"
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

150 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    12 November 2020 16: 56
    Cossacks do not bow to anyone.
    even how they bowed to both the Turks and the Lyakhs and the Russian Tsar
    and betrayed everyone with great pleasure
    1. +24
      12 November 2020 17: 03
      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
      even how they bowed to both the Turks and the Lyakhs and the Russian Tsar
      and betrayed everyone with great pleasure

      And they fought for the tsar and fought for the Revolution, and there were traitors among them and heroes, in general people as people.
      1. +12
        12 November 2020 17: 09
        That's right, less pathos and more truth ...
        1. +1
          12 November 2020 17: 46
          Indeed, anything happened ...
      2. +4
        12 November 2020 17: 12
        Quote: aleksejkabanets
        in general, people are like people.

        initially they are just land pirates
        1. +6
          12 November 2020 17: 17
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          Quote: aleksejkabanets
          in general, people are like people.

          initially they are just land pirates

          Not only overland. River and coastal too.
          1. +3
            12 November 2020 17: 20
            well, this is already particular, the Caribbean fought the same on land, but all the same, their element was the sea, and here the control system of the Cossacks was purely pirate from the beginning, it was much later they were somewhat civilized and it’s just gangster gangs who, when robbed themselves when hired for loot
            by the way, with the Lyakhs, they sewed to Moscow in turmoil
            1. +2
              12 November 2020 17: 24
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              well, this is already particular, the Caribbean fought the same on land

              Well it is clear. We can drown in the intricacies of terminology. But the Caribbean also began as "coastal brotherhood. "In general, it was not in vain that the Cossacks had" seagulls ". :)
            2. +2
              12 November 2020 18: 38
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              with lyakhams in turmoil to Moscow they sewed

              And who let the Poles into the Kremlin and swore to serve faithfully? Cossacks?
              The time was troubled. Many were sucked in "not there". And the boyars of Moscow (and not Moscow), and their people as well. And you say so as if some Cossacks and Lyakhams got confused at that time.
              Mezhakov with the Donets sided with the second militia, which played a huge role in the victory over the interventionists. Then, at the cathedral, the boyars were drowned for the Polish protege, and the Cossacks unconditionally supported Mikhail Romanov.
              1. -3
                12 November 2020 20: 42
                Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
                Many were sucked in "not there"

                well, yes, yes, the Cossacks originally went to rob in the Polish army
                1. 0
                  12 November 2020 21: 16
                  Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                  Cossacks originally went to rob

                  And they came to save
                  1. -5
                    13 November 2020 07: 44
                    do not make people laugh with your "knowledge" of history
                    1. 0
                      13 November 2020 15: 14
                      Darkness in our time is not so much a sign of a lack of education as a sign of a lack of intelligence. Only to a dark person my words can seem something funny.
                      1. -2
                        13 November 2020 16: 27
                        Well, yes, the Cossacks lived by what they grew up in the wild field
                      2. -1
                        14 November 2020 15: 26
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        Cossacks lived by what they grew up developing a wild field

                        And this as well. Plus livestock. Plus the treasury thanked for the service, not necessarily with direct money. This could be a permit for one or another activity without taxation (salt production, as an example).
                      3. -1
                        14 November 2020 16: 31
                        Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
                        Plus the treasury thanked for the service

                        this is already the 18-19th century
                        and before that, he lived by robbery without growing or grazing
                      4. +1
                        14 November 2020 16: 46
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        before that he lived

                        "Domovity" (receiving from the tsar salary, gunpowder and lead) Cossacks were, for example, in the time of Razin. And this is the 17th century.
                        Ivan lll, in the 15th and 16th centuries, already paid salaries to the Cossacks, attracting them to serve against the Horde.
                        Gorodets Cossacks have stood on the Zasechnaya Line almost since its inception (13th and 14th centuries). Received content.
                        And so, the very existence of land in the absence of tax obligations to the state in those days was already the ultimate dream for millions. Then people were quite able to feed themselves and arrange their lives with such input.
                      5. -1
                        15 November 2020 14: 39
                        Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
                        already paid salaries to the Cossacks, attracting them to serve against the Horde.

                        he Hired them, you know?
                      6. -1
                        15 November 2020 22: 05
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        he Hired them

                        So the confrontation with the Horde then was not some kind of one-time action. And an employee who works under a work contract (or on a fixed-term employment contract) for a sufficiently long time is considered by the court as admitted to the state)).
                        And you ignore the rest of the examples.
        2. +11
          12 November 2020 17: 25
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          Pirates

          The word is overseas, but in Russian it is bandits
          1. +2
            12 November 2020 17: 39
            Quote: Silvestr
            but in Russian - bandits

            And if a little neutral-romantic - robbers?)
            1. +3
              12 November 2020 17: 51
              Quote: mat-vey
              And if a little neutral-romantic - robbers?)

              I think that the person whose wallet they got into will not like the neutral-romantic definition
              1. +1
                12 November 2020 18: 03
                Quote: Silvestr
                I think that the one in whose wallet they climbed

                Well, then the time was different, probably more abruptly than now. So now yes - bandits, and then robbers.
                1. 0
                  12 November 2020 18: 32
                  If we adhere to the exact terminology, then they are not robbers, especially not bandits. The thieves. So it was called.
                  1. 0
                    12 November 2020 18: 39
                    We will get to the tates.
                    1. +2
                      12 November 2020 18: 43
                      And here it is no longer necessary! The concepts of "thief" and "thief" existed simultaneously. And they carried different meanings.
                      1. 0
                        12 November 2020 18: 45
                        You know, as they say, I'm not a genius, but linguistics ... so sorry.
                      2. +1
                        12 November 2020 18: 51
                        This is not linguistics, but history laughing According to which I successfully graduated from the faculty of the university 20 years ago hi
                      3. 0
                        12 November 2020 18: 53
                        Quote: Stroibat stock
                        This is not linguistics, but history

                        Well, even more so, where we have spent many years underground to catch such subtleties.
                  2. +1
                    12 November 2020 20: 47
                    Quote: Stroibat stock
                    So it was called.

                    more precisely tati
                    and hung them picturesquely along the roads in the trees when they caught
                2. +2
                  12 November 2020 18: 57
                  Quote: mat-vey
                  Quote: Silvestr
                  I think that the one in whose wallet they climbed

                  Well, then the time was different, probably more abruptly than now. So now yes - bandits, and then robbers.

                  I will judge you drinks Cossacks are "dashing people", put in the service of the sovereign ... They brought a lot of benefits to the state, the conquest of Siberia is worth it !!! ))
        3. +3
          12 November 2020 18: 27
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          land pirates

          The territories occupied by the Cossacks are now the breadbasket of our country. Mild climate, huge spaces. However, for several centuries in a row only our "pirates" lived on these fertile lands. Statehood in a different form to these lands was in no hurry. Why? Yes, because of the neighbors. The Cossacks did not just live somewhere in a supposedly useless "wasteland", they were our outpost in the fight against all who from this side aspired to "welcome" us. And there was someone "welcome". The living conditions undoubtedly contributed to some revelry in these parts, but making "land pirates" out of the Cossacks means not remembering your history at all.
          1. -1
            12 November 2020 18: 41
            It seems to me that you describe a little later period ... And later, whole nations were enrolled in the Cossacks.
            1. 0
              12 November 2020 21: 28
              Quote: mat-vey
              describe a little later period

              A little later than what, sorry?
              1. -1
                13 November 2020 17: 52
                Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
                they were our outpost in the fight against all who from this side aspired to "welcome" us.

                About the outpost ... just just runaways and therefore often robbers. It was only later that I had to join some side.
                1. 0
                  14 November 2020 15: 51
                  Quote: mat-vey
                  About the outpost ... just just runaways and therefore often robbers. It was only later that I had to join some side

                  These events were not so spaced out in time. So Razin was supported, for example, mainly by the Cossack rabble. When the Persian Shah complained about their forays into Moscow, the tsar replied that these particular Cossacks were "thieves" and he did not send them to Persia. While there were also servicemen Cossacks who received a salary from the tsar, lead and gunpowder, and did not participate in Razin's affairs.
                  1. -1
                    15 November 2020 05: 36
                    Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
                    the tsar replied that these particular Cossacks were "thieves"

                    It's probably more like a political excuse.
                    1. 0
                      15 November 2020 12: 27
                      Quote: mat-vey
                      a kind of political excuse

                      Yeah. And then they returned to rebel in Russia.
                      1. -1
                        15 November 2020 12: 47
                        Quote: Boris ⁣ Shaver
                        Quote: mat-vey
                        a kind of political excuse

                        Yeah. And then they returned to rebel in Russia.

                        How else can you understand these statements? - These people are not sovereigns and the state is not responsible for them - something like that.
                      2. 0
                        15 November 2020 22: 13
                        Quote: mat-vey
                        These people are not sovereign

                        And the "homely", at the same time, the sovereign.
                        Both those and others were at the same time. Moreover, at the time of Razin, at least, the "homely" were the majority, among whom there was simply a robber minority
                      3. -1
                        16 November 2020 15: 00
                        Quote: mat-vey
                        How else can you understand these statements? - These people are not sovereigns and the state is not responsible for them - something like that.

                        Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
                        When the Persian Shah complained about their forays into Moscow, the tsar replied that these particular Cossacks were "thieves" and he did not send them to Persia.

                        Quote: mat-vey
                        It's probably more like a political excuse.
                      4. 0
                        16 November 2020 16: 24
                        From nothing
          2. +4
            12 November 2020 18: 58
            Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
            The Cossacks did not just live somewhere in a supposedly useless "wasteland", they were our outpost in the fight against all who from this side aspired to "welcome" us.

            correctly! This is how the Zaporozhye Cossacks existed. there was a "wasteland" where the army gathered and trained, prepared for battles. And in the distance - sedentary Cossacks, or rather the families of these same warriors. As for the current Cossacks, in Ukraine there are definitely "bandits" who believe that all these Cossacks "Don, Kuban, Terek, Ural (Yaik) and Ussuri Cossacks" - all descended from the Ukrainian Cossacks, and the land where they live, respectively, Ukrainian.
            1. -2
              12 November 2020 19: 22
              Elena may be enough to lie, who in Ukraine from the politicians said that the lands where the descendants of the above-listed Cossacks live belong to Ukraine. And at the philistine level, no one raises this topic.
              1. +1
                12 November 2020 19: 39
                Quote: Shiden
                who in Ukraine from the politicians said that the lands where the descendants of the above-listed Cossacks live belong to Ukraine. And at the philistine level, no one raises this topic.

                Oh really? Have you read many modern Ukrainian writers? Have you been to the Museum of National Memory for a long time? But children were taken there by classes on excursions !!! And that's exactly how they enlightened! Even now, on a distance learning program - try listening to literature and history lessons - you will discover a lot of new things. Or do you need to crow from the rostrum of BP? Well, "call." Silent sly turns out to poison the souls of youth more successfully
                1. -5
                  12 November 2020 19: 49
                  Well, if a person answers that way and is rude, then he is lying. And we have even young people where, where, but in Russia, only the DPRK has not surpassed.
            2. 0
              12 November 2020 21: 25
              Quote: Egoza
              everything happened

              The Cossacks did not happen, but came out of the Russian people. Those who were not afraid of the "wild field", with its restless neighbors (and at different times Russia had a different "dickle field", here this phrase is not a term, but a metaphor), in different ways and at different times came here, expanding the boundaries of our country and serving the tranquility of its deep lands.
              In many ways, we owe to such a phenomenon as the Cossacks the endlessness of our expanses.
          3. 0
            12 November 2020 20: 54
            Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
            However, for several centuries in a row only our "pirates" lived on these fertile lands.

            for many centuries no one lived there at all
            1. -2
              12 November 2020 22: 25
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              for many centuries no one lived there at all

              Are you talking about Katarchea and early Archaea?
              1. -1
                13 November 2020 07: 43
                I'm about the wild field
                1. -1
                  13 November 2020 09: 05
                  Well then you're wrong
                  1. -1
                    13 November 2020 09: 50
                    yes you what and by whom it was inhabited and why the name is wild?
                    1. -1
                      13 November 2020 11: 33
                      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                      Who was it inhabited and why is the name wild?

                      All sorts of savages, obviously.
                      Just ask Vladimir Putin who tormented us before the coronavirus.
                      1. -1
                        13 November 2020 17: 56
                        Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
                        All sorts of savages, obviously.

                        Didn't they live? Or is it not living to roam?
                      2. 0
                        13 November 2020 19: 03
                        Quote: mat-vey
                        Didn't they live?

                        Forgive me, you ask me?
                        I, as it were, for the fact that the first and last eon without life on Earth was Katarchei.
                      3. 0
                        13 November 2020 19: 08
                        Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
                        Forgive me, you ask me?

                        It turns out your opponent. Pardonte ..
      3. 0
        13 November 2020 01: 27
        Quote: aleksejkabanets
        in general, people are like people.

        Quote: Mikhail Bulgakov, "The Master and Margarita"
        They love money, but it has always been ... Humanity loves money, no matter what it is made of, whether it is leather, paper, bronze or gold. Well, they are frivolous ... well, well ... and mercy sometimes knocks at their hearts ... ordinary people ... in general, they resemble the old ones ... the housing issue only spoiled them ...
        Put on your head.
    2. +20
      12 November 2020 17: 09
      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
      Cossacks do not bow to anyone.
      even how they bowed to both the Turks and the Lyakhs and the Russian Tsar
      and betrayed everyone with great pleasure

      That's right .. I don't understand at all when they mold heroes from Cossacks .. Ordinary mercenaries ..
      but today's, so generally dressed up clowns ..
      1. +3
        12 November 2020 17: 13
        My grandfather is a Cossack from the Don, and I'm just a Muscovite. I can sing a couple of songs with vodka. drinks Yes
        And who is Lyuba?
        1. +10
          12 November 2020 17: 17
          Quote: Bearded
          My grandfather is a Cossack from the Don, and I'm just a Muscovite

          I also have Cossacks in my relatives .. and I don’t see any advantages or advantages in this .. drinks hi
          1. +4
            12 November 2020 17: 20
            Quote: Svarog
            Quote: Bearded
            My grandfather is a Cossack from the Don, and I'm just a Muscovite

            I also have Cossacks in my relatives .. and I don’t see any advantages or advantages in this .. drinks hi

            Well, I will definitely not wave a saber and sew stripes on my pants because of this.
            1. +4
              12 November 2020 17: 43
              Quote: Bearded
              wave a sword

              So you have to learn to wave, and this is exhausting work - and with them, it's easier to fasten chocolate medals.
        2. +6
          12 November 2020 17: 31
          Quote: Bearded
          My grandfather is a Cossack from the Don, and I'm just a Muscovite. I can sing a couple of songs with vodka. drinks Yes
          And who is Lyuba?

          I have a classmate from Volgograd, a very advanced lover of history and a member of an archaeological circle with experience in excavation, he liked to quote his teacher on this topic:
          "My father was a Cossack. I am a Cossack son. And you ... Well, hell of a dog." (The original had a different word.) If I wanted to trick him, I would say "Cossack grandson." He understood what it was about. :)

          To wave a saber and sew stripes on my pants because of this, I definitely will not.

          Checker and stripes are still okay ... But when you see the "iconostasis" from a heap of crosses and medals from these "Cossacks" - it makes you sick.
        3. +1
          12 November 2020 20: 53
          Lyuba, et brother, not hukhry-muhry! Et, panimaish, LOVE! laughing
      2. +6
        12 November 2020 17: 21
        ... I don’t understand at all when they mold heroes from Cossacks ..

        The editorial task was given to Mamontov - he issued it.
        1. +6
          12 November 2020 17: 27
          Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
          ... I don’t understand at all when they mold heroes from Cossacks ..

          The editorial task was given to Mamontov - he issued it.

          Well, yes, now they were given whips to calm the protesters, so they are trying to raise the prestige ..
          1. +2
            12 November 2020 19: 00
            Quote: Svarog
            now

            Now there are no Cossacks. If you understood something about the issue about which you are actively distributing conclusions, you would know that the Cossacks are an estate. The existence of the estate is determined by external factors. The factor that at one time determined the appearance of the Cossacks (the absence of any reliable protection from the state of its extended land borders) no longer exists.
            Today you can honor history and remember the traditions of your ancestors, but today you won't be able to belong to their class - it is physically gone.
            1. -5
              12 November 2020 19: 14
              Quote: Boris ⁣ Shaver
              Quote: Svarog
              now

              Now there are no Cossacks. If you understood something about the issue about which you are actively distributing conclusions, you would know that the Cossacks are an estate. The existence of the estate is determined by external factors. The factor that at one time determined the appearance of the Cossacks (the absence of any reliable protection from the state of its extended land borders) no longer exists.
              Today you can honor history and remember the traditions of your ancestors, but today you won't be able to belong to their class - it is physically gone.

              in the first there are Cossacks, Cossack culture remained.
              secondly, the Cossacks are not an estate, as they were called under the Romanovs, but in fact the Cossacks are a HUGE PEOPLE. These are the Cherkasy, the Haidamaks, the Tartars-Dardars, rightly, or the Darians, Kalmyks, the Haiduks in Europe. The first Janissaries were Cossacks. In the distant past, the Cossacks went from the Novgordian ushkuyniks who smashed the Khazars and Germans, and then the brodniks i.e. BAROV This is even said in the film.
              The habitat of the Cossacks was from the Danube to Dauria-Horde in the Far East.
              The Cossack religion was Sleepworship, which was completely erased from memory. Well, the language was the main Russian, but they also spoke Tatar and Balakali in Ukrainian, in different ways.
              1. +2
                12 November 2020 21: 12
                Quote: Bar1
                These are Cherkasy, haidamaks, tartars-dardars

                The trouble of our time is that even the absolutely dark, weak-minded fans of composing fables have the opportunity to look for their flock in the endless information space.
                1. -4
                  12 November 2020 21: 53
                  Quote: Boris ⁣ Shaver
                  Quote: Bar1
                  These are Cherkasy, haidamaks, tartars-dardars

                  The trouble of our time is that even the absolutely dark, weak-minded fans of composing fables have the opportunity to look for their flock in the endless information space.

                  I don’t think you didn’t hear these names, now, though through clenched teeth, you started talking about it, so you are one of those who do not need the truth.
              2. +1
                13 November 2020 17: 59
                Quote: Bar1
                in fact, the Cossacks are a HUGE PEOPLE

                Here my ancestors on my father's side did not know that they were some kind of separate people ...
                1. -3
                  13 November 2020 18: 20
                  Quote: mat-vey
                  Quote: Bar1
                  in fact, the Cossacks are a HUGE PEOPLE

                  Here my ancestors on my father's side did not know that they were some kind of separate people ...

                  one should be interested in history; now it is already possible.
                  1. +1
                    13 November 2020 18: 27
                    Quote: Bar1
                    one should be interested in history; now it is already possible.

                    What can you? Declare yourself a people? And according to your theory, the Bashkirs are such a people squared? And the Cossacks and the Turkic people at the same time.
      3. +10
        12 November 2020 17: 26
        Quote: Svarog
        today's, so generally dressed up clowns ..




        they may not even be given body armor
        1. +10
          12 November 2020 17: 42
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          they may not even be given body armor

          I would popularly flog for wearing other people's orders. No conscience, no brains.
          1. -2
            12 November 2020 18: 46
            Quote: Silvestr
            Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
            they may not even be given body armor

            I would popularly flog for wearing other people's orders. No conscience, no brains.

            in general, you must first ask the Cossacks themselves, where did they get their awards and how they relate to the mummers.
          2. +3
            12 November 2020 20: 55
            Quote: Silvestr
            I'd be for wearing other people's orders

            there are often not strangers but "self-made" type for taking a toilet or for freeing a manure heap
            1. +7
              13 November 2020 03: 49
              Vladimir hi,
              if among them there were once worthy people, today they are a cowardly "army" of disguised drunks and rogues. In the mass of stupid, but greedy for a good life, permissiveness and trinkets. Such scarecrows "for the tsar" are needed to keep the PEOPLE in the "iron grip".

              1. 0
                14 November 2020 13: 31
                Aren't you ashamed to post photoshoots, lehus?
                Dumb Photoshop, dumb propaganda from Hodor hi
          3. +1
            13 November 2020 08: 39
            Quote: Silvestr
            Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
            they may not even be given body armor

            I would popularly flog for wearing other people's orders. No conscience, no brains.

            1. +1
              13 November 2020 18: 06
              Quote: Bar1
              Quote: Silvestr
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              they may not even be given body armor

              I would popularly flog for wearing other people's orders. No conscience, no brains.


              And what did you mean by that? That the state awards were vulgarized? Well, Georia was given not even to the fathers, and not even the grandfathers of these clowns.
              1. 0
                13 November 2020 18: 19
                Quote: mat-vey
                And what did you mean by that? That the state awards were vulgarized? Well, Georia was given not even to the fathers, and not even the grandfathers of these clowns.

                I want to say that the clown sechin ml. gave the order not deservedly. What is not clear?
                1. +1
                  13 November 2020 18: 22
                  Yes, now many people do not deserve it, but how does this correlate with the fact that the great-grandfather's for awards for blood is worn by someone who even did not know the service? These are not family jewels.
                  1. 0
                    13 November 2020 18: 38
                    I heard that there were such traditions that the sons of the Cossacks have the right to wear paternal awards. For example, there is such a thing abroad.

                    https://pikabu.ru/story/o_traditsiyakh_5372901
                    1. +1
                      13 November 2020 18: 42
                      My father found the real ones - rewards for blood, when you spill yours and then dress them. There is no doubt about the "Cossacks" of the great-grandfather - one of those who were sent to Paris for the centenary of the war of 1812 was sent. All uniform and ammunition at the official expense.
                      And yes, four George crosses and one medal ... And what is typical with the Yapas fought and the Soviet power at the Dalniy "installed"
                      1. 0
                        13 November 2020 18: 44
                        are you no longer a Cossack?
                      2. +1
                        13 November 2020 18: 46
                        Quote: Bar1
                        are you no longer a Cossack?

                        And what is this beast in the modern world?
                      3. -2
                        13 November 2020 18: 47
                        Quote: mat-vey
                        Quote: Bar1
                        are you no longer a Cossack?

                        And what is this beast in the modern world?

                        it's strange to hear this from someone whose ancestors were Cossacks. Read the law on the Cossacks.
                        https://legalacts.ru/doc/federalnyi-zakon-ot-05122005-n-154-fz-o/
                      4. +1
                        13 November 2020 18: 57
                        Quote: Bar1
                        Read the law on the Cossacks.

                        They wrote so much there ... and the authors, most importantly, are so wise ..
        2. +3
          12 November 2020 17: 48
          Has long been...
      4. 0
        12 November 2020 18: 20
        Quote: Svarog
        but today's, so generally dressed up clowns ..


        Violators of public order
        1. +5
          12 November 2020 21: 10
          They believe that their sins are "where it is necessary to atone for", while never "bowing". wassat

      5. +1
        12 November 2020 19: 11
        Quote: Svarog
        Ordinary mercenaries ..

        and Nekrasov's mercenaries? and my grandfather spoke differently: the Cossack does not break his hat in front of the tsar!
      6. +5
        12 November 2020 20: 59
        Sculpted by those who benefit from it. Considering their "skills" lol , the "result" is not surprised.

    3. +4
      12 November 2020 17: 55
      it is enough to look with one eye at the "experts" who, in fact, provided the "scientific" data for this film to Mamontov, and everything becomes clear. Volodikhin is known for being the first to come up with the term for the New Chronology - folk-history, which is a disgusting lie.



      he is not just a historian, but also a science fiction writer who creates a type of alternative works in the bosom of traditional history. Regarding Ivan the Terrible, Volodikhin spoke out against canonization, i.e. it is simply an adept of the black hundred.
      You should not expect from this transmission not only the truth, but even something interesting.
  2. +3
    12 November 2020 17: 11
    Stanitsa Kushchevskaya, Cossack region ...
    1. +1
      12 November 2020 17: 57
      And what about Kushchevskaya? Ali is there not enough such tragedies in Russia? And if you dig into the history of the state? Have you heard about the Kushchevskaya attack? Personally, I am bitter to hear that the beautiful village (I live nearby) has become a household name.
      1. +2
        12 November 2020 18: 24
        Quote: 210ox
        And if you dig into the history of the state?


        The argument of the level "and they hang blacks."

        Quote: 210ox
        Personally, I am bitter to hear that the beautiful village (I live nearby) has become a household name.


        Aren't you bitter that a gang ruled there and killed 12 people?
      2. +5
        12 November 2020 19: 00
        Quote: 210ox
        Personally, I am bitter to hear that the beautiful village (I live nearby) has become a household name.

        So it became! And the post "Tsukerova Balka" is not a common noun and Kushchevskaya is within reach.
        Words cannot be thrown out of the song ..
  3. +8
    12 November 2020 17: 22
    Personally, I have a shitty attitude to the Cossacks. When they stand at the Crimean bridge, and earlier in Ilyich, healthy men and mock those passing along with the traffic police, then they involuntarily agree with the red ones in a spray.
    Cossacks are an ethnos, not a profession. It is necessary to work, and not to wander in trousers in Moscow, Sochi or the Yalta embankment. And they made the ethnos a profession, live on state subsidies and play the role of overseers. Are there many inspectors in the country?
    1. +9
      12 November 2020 17: 30
      Quote: Silvestr
      When they stand at the Crimean bridge, and before in Ilyich, healthy men and mock the passing

      watchmen
      1. +7
        12 November 2020 17: 34
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        watchmen

        Kushchevka showed that they are nobody and there is no way to call them
    2. +7
      12 November 2020 17: 46
      Quote: Silvestr
      Need to work

      So they worked before. It's now .... well, clowns are shorter.
      1. +2
        12 November 2020 17: 49
        Quote: mat-vey
        This is how it worked before

        So if the clowns in the places of their compact residence toil with foolishness, then really the Cossacks cannot scare them away! laughing
        1. +3
          12 November 2020 18: 01
          Quote: Silvestr
          , then really the Cossacks

          The Cossacks ended in 1935 ... and now they are no longer needed.
    3. +9
      12 November 2020 17: 47
      hi
      Quote: Silvestr
      Cossacks are an ethnos, not a profession.

      Cossacks are not an ethnic group. Cossacks, this is a military class, who received land allotments and some local self-government for their service. In 1917, the class division was abolished, and later the service on a territorial basis was also abolished. In modern Russia, they do not give land for service and class division until the same is introduced. Consequently, in modern Russia there are no Cossacks, and all that we see, called "Cossacks" is nothing more than an ordinary clownery.
      1. 0
        13 November 2020 18: 09
        Quote: aleksejkabanets
        called "Cossacks" is nothing more than an ordinary clownery.

        Why is it so unambiguous - there is a feeling that they are trying to mold a reactionary force out of them.
        1. +1
          13 November 2020 18: 29
          Quote: mat-vey
          Why is it so unambiguous - there is a feeling that they are trying to mold a reactionary force out of them.

          Perhaps they tried, and most likely they tried. But everything went as usual for them, that is, through one place. Who is in the Cossacks today? First of all, these are state employees and dependent small farmers. Secondly, these are the old people who started this movement, today they are either careerists "licked" by the authorities, or alcoholics. This is the bulk. Some came to the Cossacks "at the call of the heart" and with good intentions. Some of them were disappointed and left, while others stayed and are there more "by inertia". So, in my opinion, it is impossible to form an analogue of "black shirts" out of the Cossacks.
          1. -1
            13 November 2020 18: 32
            Quote: aleksejkabanets
            Perhaps they tried, and most likely they tried.

            Well, they are effective everywhere. They will be effective in any business, even covering their own ...
            1. 0
              13 November 2020 18: 56
              Quote: mat-vey
              Well, they are effective everywhere. They will be effective in any business, even covering their own ...

              Well, they could not correctly calculate the "holiday" of November 4th. The only day that nothing happened. However, you shouldn't underestimate them.
              1. 0
                13 November 2020 18: 59
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                However, you shouldn't underestimate them.

                Well, the more primitive the organism, the easier it adapts and the harder it is to fight it.
                1. 0
                  13 November 2020 19: 00
                  Quote: mat-vey
                  Well, the more primitive the organism, the easier it adapts and the harder it is to fight it.

                  A virus, or rather, a cancerous tumor.
                  1. -1
                    13 November 2020 19: 01
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    Quote: mat-vey
                    Well, the more primitive the organism, the easier it adapts and the harder it is to fight it.

                    A virus, or rather, a cancerous tumor.

                    I have a doctor, I looked into textbooks - helminths.
                    1. 0
                      13 November 2020 19: 09
                      Quote: mat-vey
                      I have a doctor, I looked into textbooks - helminths.

                      Yes, they are extremely dangerous for the body.
                      1. -1
                        13 November 2020 19: 11
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Yes, they are extremely dangerous for the body.

                        It seems to be one of the most - hepatic flukes, it is very difficult to get rid of some only surgically.
                      2. -1
                        13 November 2020 19: 23
                        Quote: mat-vey
                        It seems to be one of the most - hepatic flukes, it is very difficult to get rid of some only surgically.

                        I don’t know about human, but cows, yes, they live in the eyes.
                      3. 0
                        13 November 2020 19: 27
                        Well, they are very sticky and will suck out the entire body, although they themselves will die with it.
    4. 0
      12 November 2020 21: 03
      "What is the pop - so is the arrival." (C) When well paid, many forget about the principles.

  4. +2
    12 November 2020 17: 30
    Dagestani who raped a Cossack was given a minimum sentence
    The injured Cossack Alexander: “They don’t take me to work in the village, the label“ fagot ”stuck forever. And how can I live with such baggage now? "

    A native of Dagestan, Magomed Shapi Gadzhiev, demanded that a local resident Alexander return the debt. At one time, the villager owed him 3000 rubles. The guy didn't have any money. Hajiyev did not accept the refusal - in revenge he raped a Cossack in his own house.
    By the way, there are three brothers Gadzhiev in the Cossack village of Rozhdestvenskaya. All three are judged. Senior, Arsen has already rewound his term for the fight. The middle brother is imprisoned for the rape of a fellow countrywoman. The youngest Shapi did not lag behind his relatives.
    1. -1
      12 November 2020 17: 38
      Quote: el Santo
      The injured Cossack Alexander: “They don’t take me to work in the village, the label“ fagot ”stuck forever. And how can I live with such baggage now? "


      rapist
  5. +2
    12 November 2020 17: 38
    The Soviet communists have created a positive, respectful attitude towards the "red" Cossacks, and the enemies of the communists have only ANTI, AGAINST. So, in order to be AGAINST the Bolshevik communists, they praise the BELOKAZAKS, justify their crimes in the Civil and Great Patriotic War, their complicity with the German occupiers of Russia, gave them a lot of freedom and money after the capture of Russia.
    1. +2
      12 November 2020 17: 40
      Quote: tatra
      Soviet communists created a positive, respectful attitude towards the "red" Cossacks

      There are no communists for 30 years, but they still wander the streets
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +9
    12 November 2020 17: 54
    PPC. I don't understand why these Cossacks are needed, as well as the priests. They're just getting money from the state. I would understand, if that these so-called "Cossacks", that the ROC would live on their earned money (and did not squeeze money from grandmothers). And so for me, 2 absolutely useless structures.
    1. +3
      12 November 2020 18: 13
      quite right drinks
    2. +4
      12 November 2020 18: 13
      Quote: wlade
      ... And so for me, 2 absolutely useless structures.

      If you count the useless structures and how much money they consume .. you can be horrified ..
      Pension Fund, Federation Council, Duma .. CEC .. and so on .. other .. there and the government can be attributed .. serving one president costs like the budget of a millionaire ..
      "The functioning of the President of the Russian Federation" costs the Russian budget a measly 20 billion 266 million rubles a year! And this is only spending on Putin himself, spending on "ensuring the functioning of the administration of the President and the President of the Russian Federation" costs the budget another 10 billion 171 million rubles! Spending on the President of Russia personally (not to be confused with the functioning) costs 137 million rubles annually.




      20.295.097.000 rubles are spent on Putin personally, if you include the administration in the calculation, the amount will increase to + - 41 billion rubles! And this is without additional higher authorities, because the same "administration of the President of the Russian Federation" spent 2018 billion rubles in 120!

      How much does one day in Putin's life cost to the budget?
      55 603 005 (almost fifty six million) rubles. I think that the guarantor is doing well on that kind of money, although if you remember his degree of protection, which is incredibly strong even in the air ...

      Of course, such numbers are huge, but these are only official declarations! I am afraid to imagine the size of the real costs stored in the public domain!

      In the meantime, the budget lacks 43 billion rubles to raise the salaries of doctors. But what is the salaries of doctors, 1 .799 people can live on Putin's annual income, earning the minimum wage. And a person living on the minimum wage needs to save 210 thousand 149 years to achieve what the "guarantor" receives for 935 st
      1. The comment was deleted.
  8. +4
    12 November 2020 18: 10
    At the word Cossack, now everyone imagines the mummers.
    1. 0
      15 November 2020 16: 26
      and ......, January 9, 1905, when, after the execution, the people began to spread to the palace people along the streets, these "comrades" used whips and even checkers "
  9. +6
    12 November 2020 18: 12
    I would have curtailed these Cossack women a little bit of willfulness, otherwise there is too much ambition. The neighbors of the Cossacks in their village have already nagged my father about his long hairs (you hear cho not like everyone else, go get your hair cut)
    and my father is a former rock musician. So he called them Cubanoids and he wears long hair wassat
  10. +2
    12 November 2020 18: 16
    Quote: Bar1
    First of all, Doctor of History. Volodikhin is known for being the first to come up with the term-folk-history for the New Chronology, which is a disgusting lie.

    Yes, Dmitry Mikhailovich, like a real scientist, formulated everything very accurately.
    “In order to perceive historical facts and processes in all their complexity, a good education and good mental abilities have always been required. Because of this, history can be considered an elite sphere of knowledge.
    But in addition to the lofty history for intellectuals from century to century, there was her sister, a soubrette next to a tragic heroine. Thirsty lovers to enjoy the seething passions of the court, knights' campaigns, battles of patriotism and all kinds of secrets are attracted by the popular, fictionalized story. And there is still nothing wrong with it: popular history has an educational function. Dumas or Pikul are fun and instructive.
    If story one is a mind game and science for kings, story two is study and fun for amateurs. But there is a third story, playing the role of a courtesan, a toy for the crowd, reading ochlos. Conditionally it can be called folk history. "
    It is completely incomprehensible why the okhlos takes offense at Volodikhin. All over the world folk history is directly called pseudohistory.
    1. 0
      12 November 2020 18: 41
      Quote: Undecim
      ... But there is a third story, and

      the third story does not exist, if you learned the laws of logic, you would know that in logic there is a law of exclusion of the third. And history can be real or real and false, i.e. invented. The history of the people whom you called okhlos and the history of the ruling aristocracy, sitting on the head of the people and creating all these "histories" this, as it is, is a real and fictional history. And there are no other third stories.
      1. +3
        12 November 2020 19: 45
        Bar, if you were at least in general terms familiar with logic, then you would understand that this case has nothing to do with the law tertium non datur.
        1. +1
          12 November 2020 19: 50
          Quote: Undecim
          Bar, if you were at least in general terms familiar with logic, then you would understand that this case has nothing to do with the law tertium non datur.

          we know, we know, there is a third story, there is a fourth story, each one has its own story. One agreed that real history does not exist at all, and history in general is always a lot of variants. But I don't believe in that.
          1. +2
            12 November 2020 19: 53
            But I do not believe in it.
            You are not the first or the last. This state was described in detail in his classic work.
            S. V. Mikhalkov.
    2. +3
      12 November 2020 23: 16
      How beautifully said. And the words are well chosen.
  11. +1
    12 November 2020 18: 33
    Ataman Kozitsin and the Cossack landing were the first to enter Debaltseve, knocking out ukrov from the city.



    http://rslovar.com/content/атаман-николай-козицын-«надо-мной-только-господь-бог-и-путин»
    1. +3
      12 November 2020 19: 50
      Ataman Kozitsin and the Cossack landing were the first to enter Debaltseve, knocking out ukrov from the city
      Well, this guard is known for many feats. In 1994, he and Dudayev even concluded an "AGREEMENT OF FRIENDSHIP AND COOPERATION BETWEEN THE GREAT DON AND CHECHEN REPUBLIC - ICHKERIA".
      1. -1
        12 November 2020 19: 54
        Quote: Undecim
        Ataman Kozitsin and the Cossack landing were the first to enter Debaltseve, knocking out ukrov from the city
        Well, this guard is known for many feats. In 1994, he and Dudayev even concluded an "AGREEMENT OF FRIENDSHIP AND COOPERATION BETWEEN THE GREAT DON AND CHECHEN REPUBLIC - ICHKERIA".

        In general, Lebed also entered into an agreement with Dudayev.
        But Putin, for example, when the Turks shot down our helicopter, sold our complexes to the Turks, and also brought gas and a nuclear power plant to them.
        This is the story.
        1. +4
          12 November 2020 20: 04
          with Dudayev, and Lebed also entered into
          Lebed signed the Khasavyurt agreements on behalf of the President of the Russian Federation, and Kozitsyn signed an agreement with Dudayev, being nobody. And how he "heroized" on Dobass, collecting tithes from the "liberated territories", so this is generally "history".
  12. 0
    12 November 2020 18: 44
    Well, they just exposed the Cossacks as lambs. And the dark pages of the history of the Cossacks are not only persecutions against them, but also the participation of the Cossacks with the interventionists in the war against the young Soviet republic.
    At the beginning of the 20th century, the Cossacks were real punishers, loyal dogs of bloody Nikolashka.
    For which many paid with their heads.
    1. +1
      12 November 2020 18: 52
      Quote: 7,62x54
      And the dark pages of the history of the Cossacks are not only persecutions against them, but also the joint participation of the Cossacks with the interventionists in the war against the young Soviet republic.

      Yes, the Cossacks were on Nikolashka's side and this was understandable from the point of view of history, the Cossacks were freed from many taxes under the tsar and most importantly, the Cossacks most likely did not remember who they really were. For example, the Cherkasy Cossacks were completely erased from history.
      But remember at least the story of Grigory Melekhov, how he rushed here mulberries and could not understand what was happening, it really was.
    2. -1
      13 November 2020 18: 14
      Quote: 7,62x54
      but also the participation of the Cossacks with the interventionists in the war against the young Soviet republic.

      Was that the only thing there?
  13. 0
    12 November 2020 18: 53
    Where have you seen at least one live Cossack? After March 12, 1917, when treason occurred I will condemn the Empire so called cossacks That is, the contract when they served the king, and he gave them land in possession, was terminated due to non-fulfillment and a group of people appeared without a specific occupation.
    1. +1
      12 November 2020 19: 01
      Quote: lelik613
      de you saw at least one live Cossack


      there are still Cossacks and Cossacks, Cossack culture remained.
      1. +5
        13 November 2020 05: 46
        You have strange notions about the Cossacks. So you can agree that circus performers and magicians are the basis of our army and state. I will repeat for the slow-witted: the Cossacks carried lifelong military service duties To the king which gave them the use of border lands and tax and trade benefits. It was a way of protecting the borders of the state by organizing militarized settlements, a rudiment of the times of Ivan the Terrible (a kind of "archers"). Where is there at least one place other than the village club where you can attach this strange crowd of applicants for "quality marks"?
        1. -2
          13 November 2020 08: 19
          Quote: lelik613
          You have strange notions about the Cossacks. So you can agree that circus performers and magicians are the basis of our army and state.

          I haven't seen any other circus performers besides the Cossacks with weapons. Moreover, this trick is only with checkers, and therefore only the Cossacks own such techniques.

          As for the Cossacks and the land. The Romanovs did not "give" them anything. These lands, the primordially Cossack lower reaches of the Danube, Dniester, Dnieper, Don, Kuban, Donets, Kalmius, have always belonged to the Cossacks. Names on old maps tell about it.
          Quote: lelik613
          ... Where is there at least one place other than the village club where you can attach this strange crowd of applicants for "quality marks"?

          only an amateur can say so. Possession of melee weapons implies a full set of techniques with a saber.
          1. +1
            14 November 2020 06: 18
            Apply your
            full set of techniques with a checker
            not even to the destruction of tanks, but at least one old-old BTR-40. A lot of interesting discoveries await you. If the power of the army was measured by the height of the jump and the strength of the throat, then the chorus of Aleksandrov NATO would have trampled underfoot long ago.
  14. Cat
    +1
    12 November 2020 19: 42
    But in general, the history of the Cossacks is in many ways the history of our entire country.

    Small part of it:
    In the borders of the Russian Empire, the share of Cossacks in 1782 was 1,2% of all residents (515 thousand people), in 1795 - about 700 thousand (1,5%), in 1817 - 1 million people (1,8 , 1851%), in 2 - 2,7 million (1897%), in 4,3 - 3,8 million (1916%) and in 6,3 - 4 million (about XNUMX%).
    Moreover, the most numerous groups of Cossacks were Bashkir (1719 - 209 thousand, 1916 - 1,6 million people), Donskoye (30 thousand and 1,5 million people, respectively), Kubanskoye (late 55th century - 1916 thousand, 1,4 - 1719 , 5 million people), Orenburg (1916 - 0,5 thousand, 8 - 265 million), Transbaikal (3 and 1916 thousand, respectively) and Terskoe (end of the 255th century - more than XNUMX thousand, XNUMX - XNUMX thousand people) troops, etc.

    I understand why the theme of the Cossacks is being pedaled, but I do not understand how feudal principles can be applied in our time.
  15. 0
    15 November 2020 16: 23
    have already bowed to the "tsar" for a salary of 40 thousand rubles / month and lash with whips with impunity at whom they will point out who knows!
  16. 0
    25 November 2020 10: 30
    True, the Cossacks made our country the way we know it now? What does Arkady smoke?
  17. 0
    25 November 2020 10: 36
    I live in Krasnodar and constantly come across mummers in hats with stripes in boots and a whip, besides laughter and disgust, they cause a gag reflex. I would like to unfasten the fifth point. The question is who sponsors all this and why, they have headquarters and so on ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"