Military Review

Another serial military transport Il-76MD-90A was assembled in Ulyanovsk

55
Another serial military transport Il-76MD-90A was assembled in Ulyanovsk

In Ulyanovsk, the next serial military transport aircraft Il-76MD-90A was assembled and transferred for flight tests. This was reported by the press service of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC).


The new aircraft has already been transferred to the flight test station (LIS), where a number of ground and flight tests will be carried out. After all the necessary tests have been carried out, the aircraft will be painted and handed over to the Ministry of Defense for operation.

Before the transportation of the new aircraft to the LIS, the customer representatives were presented with the results of testing the fuel system and the tightness of the aircraft fuel tanks, carried out its general technical inspection, control of the shape and quality of the outer surface, and inspection of the product for completeness. After that, the work on the production stage of the final assembly was completed.

said the director of the Il-76 and Il-112V programs Oleg Siyanchev.


Note that the delivery of the Il-76MD-90A is delayed. In 2019, Aviastar-SP delivered three Il-76MD-90A military transport aircraft out of five planned for delivery to VTA VKS RF, postponing the delivery of two more to 2020. This year the military was to receive two "last year" aircraft plus six more Il-76MD-90A.

In May 2020, the Ministry of Defense renegotiated the contract for the supply of the Il-76MD-90A with Aviastar-SP JSC on new terms. Under the new conditions, under the old contract in 2012, the plant will now deliver a total of 13 Il-76MD-90A aircraft, and from 2021 a new contract for the supply of 2028 such aircraft will come into force until 14.

The heavy military transport IL-76MD-90A is a profound modernization of the IL-76MD aircraft. The new IL-76MD-90A, unlike the drill IL-76MD, is equipped with PS-90A-76 engines with a thrust of up to 14,5 tons instead of the "standard" D-30KP2 with a thrust of up to 12 tons. The aircraft received a new wing and a “glass” cockpit: the gauges were replaced by instruments with LCD displays. At IL-76MD-90A, the carrying capacity increased to 60 tons and the range of delivery of troops and cargo - up to 5000 km.
Photos used:
Aviastar-SP
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 11 November 2020 11: 50
    12
    Day of good news however! We must cross ourselves so as not to jinx it!
    1. Proxima
      Proxima 11 November 2020 11: 59
      21
      The fact that Russia can in principle produce aircraft of this class is already a tremendous achievement !!! This is an analogue of long-haul aircraft, the production of which was lost in the new Russia. You look, someday we will squeeze Airbus and Boeing on the internal lines. Very good news! good
      1. NEOZ
        NEOZ 11 November 2020 12: 34
        -1
        Quote: Proxima
        This is an analogue of long-haul aircraft

        no .... B747 takes 2 times more cargo ....
        1. Proxima
          Proxima 11 November 2020 12: 49
          0
          Quote: NEOZ
          Quote: Proxima
          This is an analogue of long-haul aircraft

          no .... B747 takes 2 times more cargo ....

          What is "no"? Make your point clearer. request
          1. NEOZ
            NEOZ 11 November 2020 13: 34
            +6
            Quote: Proxima
            What is "no"

            it is not analogous to long-haul wide-body cargo aircraft.
      2. mihail_mihail0620
        mihail_mihail0620 11 November 2020 12: 47
        +1
        Proxima, since when has the production of silt-96 been lost? Let us squeeze Boeings and Airbuses when we make the PD-35 engine and it turns out to be more reliable and more economical than the western ones, only this is not about internal lines, you started talking about trunk lines.
        1. Proxima
          Proxima 11 November 2020 13: 22
          +2
          Quote: mihail_mihail0620
          Proxima, since when has the production of silt-96 been lost? Let us squeeze Boeings and Airbuses when we make the PD-35 engine and it turns out to be more reliable and more economical than the western ones, only this is not about internal lines, you started talking about trunk lines.

          And why all of a sudden, internal lines cannot be long-haul? belay Russia seems to be not Luxembourg. request As for the Il-96, it is being produced practically on the reserves of the Soviet Union. Either no aircraft is produced per year, or only one, maximum 2. And in 1994 a record was set - 3 aircraft. From 2000 to 2003 - 0 aircraft! You can't call it full-fledged production! Although the plane is great, especially in terms of safety - not a single fatal accident! And in general, long-distance carriers are a high-tech sphere! The real production of this aircraft needs to be revived. And we cannot give birth for a year in Irkutsk MS-21, which, by the way, is not a long-haul aircraft. what Miracles, and more! request
          1. Genry
            Genry 11 November 2020 14: 08
            0
            Quote: Proxima
            And we cannot give birth for a year in Irkutsk MS-21, which, by the way, is not a long-haul aircraft.

            You have a warm and soft tangled.
            MS-21 is already available with both foreign and domestic engines. The only problem is certification.
            1. Proxima
              Proxima 11 November 2020 15: 19
              0
              In the sense of mass production !!! From such pictures to a series - an abyss! Can you tell me when you originally planned to put the MS-21 into production? And now the series will take place according to forecasts in 2025.
              1. Genry
                Genry 11 November 2020 16: 12
                +1
                Quote: Proxima
                Can you tell me when you originally planned to put the MS-21 into production? And now the series will take place according to forecasts in 2025.

                https://aviation21.ru/ms-21-poslednie-novosti-i-status-programmy/
                Control points for 2020-2021
                .....
                The release of the first six serial machines and the beginning of commercial operation - the end of 2021.
                .....
                Release of 12 liners - 2022
                Release of 25 liners - 2023
                Production of 72 MC-21 per year - by 2025
                1. bayard
                  bayard 12 November 2020 01: 00
                  +4
                  Quote: Genry
                  Control points for 2020-2021
                  .....
                  The release of the first six serial machines and the beginning of commercial operation - the end of 2021.
                  .....
                  Release of 12 liners - 2022
                  Release of 25 liners - 2023
                  Production of 72 MC-21 per year - by 2025

                  This is all beautiful, of course, but still, from plans to really production aircraft, and even more so - the beginning of their operation, we still have to get there.
                  And it won't be easy to get there ...
                  Quite recently, ALL foreign suppliers of components for the MS-21 and even the Superjet ... refused to supply ready-made components, blocks and assemblies to Russia ...
                  And how to start mass production in such conditions?
                  If we do not have our own production of these units, blocks and assemblies?
                  And next in line is the refusal to supply radio-electronic components ...
                  This was voiced at a meeting with Putin.
                  And we will wait another 10 years for complete (! Otherwise, nothing) import substitution!
                  Alas, this is so. We can't do it any faster. And the quality of replacement is not very good either ...
                  With considerable difficulty, we set up the production of domestic carbon fiber.
                  Hooray ?
                  Hurray, but not really. It is not yet clear how much this carbon corresponds to the terms of reference ... In terms of strength, it is somewhat inferior to Japanese, it is more ... fleecy ... The latter may even contribute to better dressing and adhesion of layers, but ... our carbon is also a little ... thicker than Japanese ...
                  And the technical process and strength, weight parameters are designed specifically for Japanese carbon or carbon with the same characteristics. That is, to start the production of a "black wing" from its carbon fiber, it is necessary to carry out all the strength and weight tests - the entire test cycle from scratch.
                  And this is time.
                  And the tests of the new - domestic wing have not yet begun ... request
                  Alas, this is so.
                  And how in such conditions to ensure the promised:
                  Quote: Genry
                  The release of the first six serial machines and the beginning of commercial operation - the end of 2021.

                  , I won't put my mind to it. recourse
                  If we build the old stocks (Japanese) from carbon, then at the time of the American sanctions we had a stock for about 5 aircraft ...
                  And which plane, with which wing will we be certified?
                  With the old (Japanese)?
                  Or with a new one - domestic?
                  Which is not yet and the tests will not end soon ...
                  Therefore, I am VERY surprised at such confident statements from our political and sectoral leadership.
                  What do they mean?
                  Or will it be like with the Il-76MD90A?
                  When, according to plans and oath promises, today (by the end of 2020) 39 such aircraft are to be delivered fellow ONLY in VKS ?!
                  I am afraid so. request
                  For there is no reason for unbridled optimism, I am on the horizon of our realities ... request ... not watching.
                  It's a pity .
                  hi
                  1. Genry
                    Genry 12 November 2020 14: 22
                    0
                    Quote: bayard
                    Quite recently, ALL foreign suppliers of components for the MS-21 and even the Superjet ... refused to supply ready-made components, blocks and assemblies to Russia ...

                    Your word "ALL" immediately speaks of an exaggerated fake.

                    Production Superjets did not stop and rests only on the market (demand). Likewise with spare parts for operation.
                    MS-21 with the PD-14 engine has 80% of domestic components. Many were developed by foreign firms, but production will be local. The remaining 20% ​​are not monopolized ...
                    Quote: bayard
                    And next in line is the refusal to supply radio-electronic components ...

                    Here, as with engines, there is an option with imports and domestic ones. Due to the use of an open architecture, the aircraft, at the request of customers, can be equipped with equipment of any manufacturer (provided that it has the appropriate certificates).
                    Quote: bayard
                    And the technical process and strength, weight parameters are designed specifically for Japanese carbon or carbon with the same characteristics. That is, to start the production of a "black wing" from its carbon fiber, it is necessary to carry out all the strength and weight tests - the entire test cycle from scratch.
                    And this is time.

                    You could write about it in 2018 ...
                    Quote: bayard
                    And which plane, with which wing will we be certified?
                    With the old (Japanese)?
                    Or with a new one - domestic?
                    Which is not yet and the tests will not end soon ...

                    Do you have an old training manual?
                    https://aviation21.ru/ms-21-poslednie-novosti-i-status-programmy/
                    "Russian PCM manufacturers, together with the MC-21 aircraft developer, conducted qualification tests of domestic materials in accordance with aviation regulations. Tests carried out in centers certified by the Federal Air Transport Agency showed that all the characteristics of the materials meet the requirements for the aircraft design. Irkut Corporation has started production of serial parts and assemblies from domestic composites. The transition to Russian materials will not lead to a deterioration in the flight technical and economic performance of the MC-21-300 aircraft.
                    .
                    The Federal Air Transport Agency accepted an application for certification of domestic PCMs in the main elements of the airframe.
                    "
                    Quote: bayard
                    When, according to plans and oath promises, today (by the end of 2020) 39 such aircraft are to be delivered

                    There was strong inflation, which led to producer losses. In addition, equipment was deployed for non-slipway serial assembly, which led to a revision of the timing ...
                    Under the old contract in 2012, 13 aircraft will be delivered, and from 2021 a new contract will come into force until 2028 for 14 aircraft (for the same money).
                    Quote: bayard
                    For I don't see any reason for unbridled optimism on the horizon of our realities ... request ....

                    You have unbridled pessimism, which leads to the effect of a fly looking ...
                    1. bayard
                      bayard 13 November 2020 00: 32
                      0
                      Quote: Genry
                      You have unbridled pessimism, which leads to the effect of a fly looking ...

                      By no means, I just try to be objective and do not believe in the reports - "faith without deeds is dead."
                      Quote: Genry
                      Tests carried out in centers certified by the Federal Air Transport Agency showed that all the characteristics of the materials meet the requirements for the aircraft design.

                      Sorry, but were these tests of the actual materials, or of the wing and other empennage elements from them? As far as I heard, the finished wing of their domestic composite has not yet been tested ... and it seems they have not even been made. But new material can also present tricks. If the strength of the new composite is somewhat inferior, then the calculated number of layers of winding may be insufficient, and strength tests for fatigue and maximum loads require more than one wing to be "broken" during testing. And fatigue cannot be tested in a couple of months. And I have no information about the full test cycle of the WING ... On the contrary, there is information that the test center of the wing has not yet received from the new composite for testing. If I am mistaken and my information is incorrect, I will only be glad, because I wish the MC-21 program success.
                      Quote: Genry
                      There was strong inflation, which led to producer losses. In addition, equipment was deployed for non-slipway serial assembly, which led to a revision of the timing ...
                      Under the old contract in 2012, 13 aircraft will be delivered, and from 2021 a new contract will come into force until 2028 for 14 aircraft (for the same money).

                      I know all this, as well as I know that this year they promised (a year ago) to hand over to the customer 6 - 8 aircraft already from the new line, but instead only those that were not delivered according to the plans of last year are handed over, and even the firstborn from the assembly line will be delivered this year will not succeed ... Yes, and I did not see these aircraft on the conveyor in the workshop ... an almost empty new workshop - the first aircraft passes through the test, while still at the assembly stage, at most 2 - 3 in blanks.
                      But last year they presented a delivery schedule for the next 6 - 8 years, with the line accelerating to 18 aircraft per year.
                      And now they are already saying that the capacity will make it possible to produce in a few years ... up to 12 units.
                      And even earlier they promised to launch TWO such assembly lines with a capacity of 18 pcs. each year.
                      So bravura reports have absolutely nothing in common with real life. Everything is very difficult, unhurriedly, with ever new excuses and "objective reasons". This is unprofessionalism!
                      Best case scenario .
                      And at worst, sabotage and sabotage.
                      We have only 3 - 4 Ruslans left in service, and all Il-76s are old, they work for wear and tear. The program of repair and modernization of up to 100 Il-76s from storage bases to compensate for the shortage in VTA due to the disruption of Ulyanovsk supplies ... FAILED. Since 2015, only 1 (!!!) board has hardly gone through such modernization.
                      And that's it!
                      The program is dead!
                      You can engage in the process as much as you want, but if there is no result, then such a process is called ... masturbation.
                      Due to non-deliveries of the Il-76MD90A, plans for 50 tankers and 50 sides / platforms for the A-100 were thwarted. In addition to plans for VTA, this is the delivery of 100 new aircraft ...
                      This is undermining the combat effectiveness of all the RF Armed Forces.
                      Anyone who wants to do a job (complete a task) is looking for opportunities, and those who want to steal / disrupt / fail, writes reports about "objective reasons."
                      And proceeding from the fact that no one controls such programs, no one accompanies the project from the Ministry of Defense, the government and the presidential administration, it follows that the modern government is not very concerned about the issues of nat. security and defense, as well as the health and development of the aircraft industry.

                      And so we have almost everything.
        2. Rubi0
          Rubi0 11 November 2020 14: 25
          +5
          Because it was in Uzbekistan. Under the USSR, such a feeling was specially endured by the production from the rsfsr
          1. Reviews
            Reviews 11 November 2020 15: 12
            +2
            Quote: Rubi0
            Because it was in Uzbekistan. Under the USSR, such a feeling was specially endured by the production from the rsfsr

            Feel better. Outside the RSFSR, there were exactly four aircraft factories (not ARZ): Tbilisi, TAPOiCH, KhAZ and the plant at the Design Bureau named after I. Antonov, although he could not cope with the series. Plus Minsk ARZ. There were two engine aircraft factories: Progress and Motorostroitel. At the same time, a bunch of components for these plants were produced, again, in the RSFSR.
            Now count the aircraft factories in the RSFSR.
            1. Rubi0
              Rubi0 11 November 2020 21: 08
              +1
              And this is a lot, in the colonies there should be harmful production, and also graze rams and collect strawberries
    2. Civil
      Civil 11 November 2020 12: 43
      -1
      The aircraft received a new wing and a "glass" cockpit: the dial gauges were replaced by LCD displays.

      How long can journalists talk nonsense ... "glass cockpit" is not the presence of LCD screens and solid glazing, it is a video review system that allows crew members, with the help of instruments, to look at the surrounding space without interference, as if there were no cockpit. This is called the "glass cockpit".
      1. sir.jonn
        sir.jonn 11 November 2020 14: 13
        +4
        Quote: Civil
        The aircraft received a new wing and a "glass" cockpit: the dial gauges were replaced by LCD displays.

        How long can journalists talk nonsense ... "glass cockpit" is not the presence of LCD screens and solid glazing, it is a video review system that allows crew members, with the help of instruments, to look at the surrounding space without interference, as if there were no cockpit. This is called the "glass cockpit".

        "Glass cockpit" is a cockpit panel of an aircraft, which includes electronic displays. In a traditional cockpit, many mechanical indicators are installed to display information. (Https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_cabin)
      2. Reviews
        Reviews 11 November 2020 15: 14
        +1
        Quote: Civil
        a video surveillance system that allows crew members, with the help of instruments, to look at the surrounding space without interference, as if there were no cockpit. This is called the "glass cockpit".

        This is called "delirium". The "glass-cockpit" is the equipment of the cockpit with multifunctional displays. This semi-term has existed since the 1990s.
  2. Invoce
    Invoce 11 November 2020 11: 53
    +9
    We need to produce more of our own, Russian planes, aircraft engines, Avionics, components ... With an increase in the quantity, the quality improves due to the experience gained in production, bringing to the design characteristics and eliminating the "childish" problems of new technology and increasing failure statistics.
    As a rule, in all countries the military-industrial complex was and is both the locomotive of the economy and the supplier of the latest technologies for civilian industries. So drop by drop - and something changes for the better in life!
    1. x.andvlad
      x.andvlad 11 November 2020 12: 01
      +6
      So that news, of course good. The plane is handsome. BUT from 2021 to 2028 14 aircraft are not enough (2 units per year). After all, we have been producing them for several years.
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 11 November 2020 12: 29
        +9
        So this is a realistic plan. The current contract was fabulous and as a result, it failed completely.

        If that this year 0 aircraft of the 2020 program have been delivered, only the debt is 2019.

        The hero of the news will be delivered 100% in 2021. For example
        0204 was rolled out to LIS at the end of March 2020, on August 26, 2020, it flew, still not transferred to the MO.
      2. EnGenius
        EnGenius 11 November 2020 13: 51
        +5
        This is reality, not the initial wishlist of MO. In fact, a new production was built. Kind of like the production line is designed for 5-6 aircraft a year. Perhaps only transport modifications are included in this new contract, the Il-78 and A-50 are not included ...
        1. bayard
          bayard 12 November 2020 01: 22
          +2
          Quote: engenius
          Kind of like the production line is designed for 5-6 aircraft per year

          The production line was originally designed for the production of 18 aircraft per year, but ... in the latest "Military Acceptance" a more modest figure is named - 12 units. per year, which has yet to be reached within a few years.
          And in total, two such lines were going to be launched, with a capacity of up to 18 units. planes each (a total of 36 per year).
          So far, this one and only ... is being tested ...
          Quote: engenius
          Perhaps only transport modifications are included in this new contract, the Il-78 and A-50 are not included ...

          In connection with the disruption of the production program for the Il-76MD90A, the construction of AWACS aircraft based on the Tu-214 airframe is being considered. In terms of carrying capacity (the weight of the equipment and antenna mushroom), it is suitable, and in terms of range, it may even surpass. With 2 engines, it is much more economical.
          But so far no details have been heard about the promotion of this program. Since the beginning of this year.
          So far, all the expected and ordered Il-76MD90A are planned in the VKS TA and, in the ID-78MD90A version, by tankers.
    2. Jacket in stock
      Jacket in stock 11 November 2020 12: 28
      -4
      Quote: Invoce
      We need to release more of our own

      Who needs?
      Why do you need?
      Our commanders recently told that they definitely do not need it.
      And everything you need can be bought. And judging by the news, this opinion is still in circulation.
      1. Invoce
        Invoce 11 November 2020 12: 40
        +8
        Quote: Jacket in stock
        Quote: Invoce
        We need to release more of our own

        Who needs?
        Why do you need?
        Our commanders recently told that they definitely do not need it.
        And everything you need can be bought. And judging by the news, this opinion is still in circulation.

        Who needs? Everyone needs it! The economy, in order to sell planes and operate them, To airlines, to fly their planes and not be afraid of sanctions for misbehavior (flights to Crimea, Iran ...) Thousands of specialists, Workers, to receive salaries, pay taxes, teach children (to have children), to pay pensions ... There are a lot of examples when, in order to please the monopolies, their production was killed. Our aviation industry was almost killed, Ukraine I killed the industry by opening its markets ... Greece killed shipbuilding ... The result is a critical drop in the standard of living of the population, the collapse of the economy, .... an increase in the national debt, dependence on foreign states .. This is not need!
        1. Jacket in stock
          Jacket in stock 11 November 2020 17: 22
          +1
          Quote: Invoce
          Who needs? Everyone needs it!

          You have not listed all of them. They named only those who do not make decisions - workers, pensioners ...
          Decisions are made by completely different people, and apparently they do not need it.
          For example, the former director of Aeroflot is definitely not needed. And since he has now become a minister, it means that the government does not need it either.
        2. bayard
          bayard 12 November 2020 01: 36
          +2
          All of you listed really need it.
          And for defense - it is necessary.
          And our few remaining partners are ready to buy both transport and passenger aircraft from us (Iran alone is ready to buy from 300 to 500 passenger aircraft, but in a purely Russian configuration) ...
          But the fact that this is NECESSARY for our - Russian POWER ... is not visible.
          For the life of me - not visible.
          Otherwise, they would control these industries, help, stimulate, react to emerging problems, suppress (!) Theft and abuse ...
          But we DO NOT OBSERVE this!
          All the guilty and "responsible" are inviolable and do not bear responsibility!
          The government simply gives money for the project and forgets for several years. request Then she remembers, is interested, they explain to her why it didn’t work out, ask for more money, receive (or not) and ... wait further. lol
          wink Corruption, sabotage and sabotage here, of course yes does not smell.
          It's just that the existing power has some other ... interests ...
          Ending 2020 smile it's time to take stock.
          Consolidate plans, costs and ... results.
          Do not beat. request
          But bully "this is different."

          "Coronovirus" will write off EVERYTHING - to everyone in the bunker ... sorry, in "self-isolation".
    3. Orange bigg
      Orange bigg 11 November 2020 12: 54
      +1
      Quote: Invoce
      We need to produce more of our own, Russian planes, aircraft engines, Avionics, components ... With an increase in the quantity, the quality improves due to the experience gained in production, bringing to the design characteristics and eliminating the "childish" problems of new technology and increasing failure statistics.
      As a rule, in all countries the military-industrial complex was and is both the locomotive of the economy and the supplier of the latest technologies for civilian industries. So drop by drop - and something changes for the better in life!


      Another piece of news from the aviation industry.
      The Irkut Corporation, which is part of the United Aircraft Corporation, has completed the construction of an MC-21-310 prototype aircraft that will undergo flight tests with Russian PD-14 engines. On November 6, the aircraft was transferred from the final assembly workshop to the flight test division of the Irkutsk Aviation Plant, a branch of the Irkut corporation.

      https://rostec.ru/news/rostekh-zavershil-postroyku-pervogo-ms-21-310-s-dvigatelyami-pd-14/
      1. slipped
        slipped 11 November 2020 13: 16
        +3
        Quote: OrangeBigg
        completed the construction of a prototype MS-21-310 aircraft, which will undergo flight tests with Russian PD-14 engines.


      2. bayard
        bayard 12 November 2020 01: 45
        +2
        Quote: OrangeBigg
        Another piece of news from the aviation industry.

        MS-21 with its own engine, that's good.
        Even very good, although much later than expected / promised.
        Here are just hardware saturation from foreign suppliers ... we were refused.
        And Putin was informed about this UNDER CAMERA.
        But they stubbornly continue to report on the start of mass production from next year.
        I wonder HOW are they going to do it?
        Or do they absolutely not think about what they are saying?
        Or are they so confident in their own IRRESPONSIBILITY?
        YES ! yes
        They are absolutely confident in their irresponsibility!
  3. Nastia makarova
    Nastia makarova 11 November 2020 11: 58
    -3
    great news
  4. Woodman
    Woodman 11 November 2020 11: 59
    +3
    The new aircraft has already been transferred to the flight test station (LIS), where a number of ground and flight tests will be carried out.
    And yesterday the news slipped through about the MC-21
    The Rostec State Corporation has completed the construction of the first MC-21-310 prototype aircraft with Russian PD-14 engines.
    .
    On November 6, the aircraft was transferred from the final assembly workshop to the flight test division of the Irkutsk Aviation Plant - a branch of the Irkut corporation.
  5. Reviews
    Reviews 11 November 2020 12: 00
    0
    from 2021, a new contract will enter into force for the supply of 2028 such aircraft until 14.

    Two boards a year ??? I have no words.
    1. Invoce
      Invoce 11 November 2020 12: 13
      0
      Quote: Avis
      from 2021, a new contract will enter into force for the supply of 2028 such aircraft until 14.

      Two boards a year ??? I have no words.

      The problem is in the supply of components, their manufacture by subcontractors, and this requires funding !!!! recourse Signing contracts .... It takes YEARS .... It's a nightmare ...
      To all this is added the lack of assembly sites (slipways), production facilities, specialists .. all this was reduced by "effective" managers Chubais, Shokhin ..... And in the absence of any significant order for aircraft, plan the development of production, yes and no one will invest in it ..
  6. Jacket in stock
    Jacket in stock 11 November 2020 12: 00
    +6
    On the one hand, everything seems to be fine.
    On the other hand, there are many questions.
    For example, why is it so slow?
    Okay, last year we were told that it takes a long time to "harness".
    A new production line is being prepared at the plant, and as soon as it starts working (it seems like they wrote that it has already started working), new planes will go like hot cakes, 7 pieces a year.
    However, for the year only the third board, and taking into account last year's debt, then count the first.
    Where is that production line?
    Or am I missing something?
    1. x.andvlad
      x.andvlad 11 November 2020 12: 18
      +2
      Either there is no line yet, or there are no specialists to work on it. It is necessary to send to China for an internship.
  7. askort154
    askort154 11 November 2020 12: 01
    +2
    The new Il-76MD-90A, unlike the combat Il-76MD, are equipped with PS-90A-76 engines with a thrust of up to 14,5 tons instead of the "standard" D-30KP2 with a thrust of up to 12 tons.

    A very significant indicator for the thrust-to-weight ratio of the aircraft. yes
  8. alex aircraft
    alex aircraft 11 November 2020 12: 07
    -2
    Now let's compare how much IL 76 was made in Tashkent a year under the Soviet Union and how much is capitalism in action now?
    1. Jacket in stock
      Jacket in stock 11 November 2020 12: 18
      +1
      Quote: Alex aircraft
      equal how much a year under the Union did

      No, no need to compare.
      Under the Soviet Union, they did it in reserve, it was necessary, not necessary, they did it anyway. They made a lope that we are still flying.
      And under capitalism they do exactly as much as is needed here and now.
      This is in theory.
      And in life, of course you are right, stupidly not mogem.
      1. Reviews
        Reviews 11 November 2020 12: 37
        +3
        Quote: Jacket in stock
        Quote: Alex aircraft
        equal how much a year under the Union did

        No, no need to compare.
        Under the Soviet Union, they did it in reserve, it was necessary, not necessary, they did it anyway. They made a lope that we are still flying.

        I don't know how it was with the VTA, but the Civil Air Fleet always lacked planes: from the late 1950s to the very collapse of the Soviet Union. Civilian squadrons were suffocating. KB every few years have been tricky with layouts. sealing chairs. There was no stock in the USSR. But the VTA did not stand idle either: An-22 and Il-76 were widely used for civil transportation. First of all, to the North.
    2. _Sergei_
      _Sergei_ 11 November 2020 12: 21
      +2
      And how much is done in Tashkent now?
      1. Jacket in stock
        Jacket in stock 11 November 2020 12: 25
        +2
        Quote: _Sergey_
        And how much is done in Tashkent now?

        And in Tashkent, they don't make planes, because they don't need them.
        And if they need a lope, they buy in America / Europe, but certainly not a drain, so that the whole plant can be maintained.
      2. seregin-s1
        seregin-s1 11 November 2020 12: 43
        +5
        All that was left of the plant was transported to Ulyanovsk.
    3. donavi49
      donavi49 11 November 2020 12: 40
      +8
      Tashkent is everything. It is wiser to compare with the Chinese. Their plane took flight a year later. And now the entire factory airfield is packed with new ones. Even the prototype with its own engines has already been rolled out.



      13 aircraft were transferred to the 9th division - Kaifeng.

      1. Lexus
        Lexus 11 November 2020 14: 03
        +5
        Yeah. In China - "like hot cakes", and in our country - "a teaspoon per hour." (FROM)
  9. faiver
    faiver 11 November 2020 12: 23
    0
    Artel IPshnaya collects them chtol?
    As well as the Be-200
    Disgraceful
    1. slipped
      slipped 11 November 2020 13: 18
      +3
      Quote: faiver
      Artel IPshnaya collects them chtol?


      Enlighten laughing

  10. zwlad
    zwlad 11 November 2020 15: 11
    0
    It is very good. It is necessary to revive the aviation industry. In all directions.
  11. borys
    borys 11 November 2020 18: 32
    +5
    During the discussion, there was a question - in what quantities was produced
    IL-76 in Tashkent (TAPOiCH). At the best of times, at least 60 cars
    in year. Plus a considerable number of units and spare parts for servicing
    living previously released. For the entire production time on this
    the plant produced more than 900 machines in different versions.
    Production took place from 1979 to 2012.
  12. borys
    borys 11 November 2020 20: 13
    0
    Wrong on the last line - from 1973 to 2012.
  13. Pavel57
    Pavel57 12 November 2020 08: 08
    0
    Quote: Avis
    from 2021, a new contract will enter into force for the supply of 2028 such aircraft until 14.

    Two boards a year ??? I have no words.


    Yes, you can buy 737MAX.
    1. Reviews
      Reviews 12 November 2020 14: 55
      +1
      Quote: Pavel57
      Quote: Avis
      from 2021, a new contract will enter into force for the supply of 2028 such aircraft until 14.

      Two boards a year ??? I have no words.


      Yes, you can buy 737MAX.

      Fuck. Boeing's marketers have played nowhere further, have sunk to mass murders. Them - for a stake, and the corporation - for a complete cleaning, leave only techies.
  14. Bronekot
    Bronekot 12 November 2020 11: 12
    0
    Immediately into battle. To Armenia
  15. sifgame
    sifgame 15 November 2020 19: 12
    0
    Cool, but slow. Great memory to Genrikh Vasilievich Novozhilov for this plane.