UK returns control of nuclear arsenal from private hands

21

Anglo-American sea-based intercontinental Trident during testing at US proving grounds. Source: ukdefencejournal.org.uk

"Privatization" of the nuclear baton


As soon as the Cold War ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union (Soviet Union, USSR), the United Kingdom (United Kingdom, UK, UK) decided to reduce the cost of maintaining its own nuclear arsenal in combat readiness. To do this, in 1993, all nuclear defense assets were transferred to the management of the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE). Until 1999, the management of the company was in the hands of Hunting-BRAE.

The government's logic was clear and simple - to ensure budget savings for the development, storage and operation of nuclear weapons through the conclusion of an agreement with a private organization. Private traders will spend money more efficiently, and you won't have to bother with recruiting personnel. Britain's membership in the ranks of NATO / NATO / OTAN (brothers in the nuclear club will help if anything happens) and the noticeably weakened strike potential of Russia (Russia) were also important reasons for reducing the attention in its own arsenal.



Of course, one cannot say that the British entrusted their nuclear weapons to the first merchants they meet. First, since 1999, AWE shares have been owned by quite serious companies Lockheed Martin (51%), Serco (24,5%) and Jacobs Engineering (24,5%). Of these three, only Serco is a British company, the rest are from the United States (USA). Secondly, the right to veto any shareholder decision or a hypothetical “golden share” remains in the hands of the UK government. This greatly limits the freedom of action of AWE managers. For example, they cannot take and withdraw the entire arsenal outside the country. At the end of the 1999th century, the British were quite satisfied with this scheme, and in 25 London renewed the contract with AWE for another XNUMX years. At the same time, the Ministry of Defense (MOD, MoD) of Great Britain remained the owner of all buildings and production equipment.


The British have only four Vanguard-class submarines with 16 Trident ballistic missiles on board each. Source: army-technology.com

In the very first years of operation, AWE removed the WE177 free-fall nuclear bombs from the British Armed Forces, leaving only the sea-based ballistic Trident bombs. Currently, the nuclear deterrence of Foggy Albion is supported by four Vanguard-class submarines, each carrying 16 ballistic missiles. Despite the fact that Trident is a joint development with the Americans, the UK uses their own Holbrook warhead with a capacity of 100 kilotons. AWE has been engaged all this time with minor missile upgrades, assembling warheads for new ones, as well as maintenance.

The headquarters of the "nuclear contractor" is located in the alma mater of the British nuclear program in the town of Aldermaston (Aldermaston). In Burghfield, the final assembly of the warheads for the Trident is underway, and in Cardiff, they are working with the deadly stuffing of atomic weapons. Blacknest is home to the nuclear seismology division. This direction makes it possible, by seismic activity, to distinguish nuclear weapons tests from an ordinary earthquake, as well as to determine the source of the explosion and its power. AWE now employs about 6000 people, some of whom also conduct research in the field of mathematical modeling of nuclear tests and calculations of the operational reliability of warheads. By the way, AWE specialists were involved in the investigation of the attempt on Alexander Litvinenko's life, and without their help, radioactive polonium in the body of the poisoned person would not have been detected.


Aldermaston is the birthplace of the first British nuclear weapons. The AWE headquarters are now based here. Source: en.wikipedia.org

The office actively cooperates with Los Alamos (Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA) and in the early 2000s, together with the Americans, they even carried out authorized underground atomic explosions. The tests used the so-called subcritical mini-charges, which are not covered by the convention.

All of this allows the British to keep their nuclear weapons program relatively strong, although it has been almost entirely dependent on the United States since 1958. This year, an agreement was signed on cooperation between London and Washington in the field of nuclear weapons. Although it is difficult to call it cooperation, given the potentials of the two countries. Therefore, it is rather about the patronage of the United States. The British regularly renew the contract every ten years.

In addition to improving the weapon shield, AWE's responsibilities include disposing of spent nuclear weapons and production waste. This area of ​​activity often comes to the attention of local nuclear disarmament activists. Environmentalists will find unauthorized emissions of tritium into the river, then they will unearth stories about numerous fires at the company's facilities. British pacifists have selected the AWE headquarters in Aldermaston as the main target of attacks, and regularly organize demonstrations near nuclear facilities.

Under the wing of the state


London had no particular complaints about the work of AWE, at least they did not openly state this.
And in early November, Defense Minister Robert Ben Lobban Wallace assured the company's shareholders in writing that the military would terminate the contract ahead of schedule and, in June 2021, would completely return the country's nuclear sector under its control.

Recall that the agreement was concluded in 1999 for a period of 25 years. After such an announcement, the British Serco became seriously ill - shares on the stock exchange fell by 12%. The company is heavily dependent on government money in general, and the loss of several tens of millions of pounds in revenue could be a major hit especially in a pandemic.

The giants Lockheed Martin and Jacobs Engineering were not particularly upset by the early break, and the companies' shares corrected slightly.
It is interesting that the Ministry of Defense did not make such a decision in a hurry. Back in 2019, the aforementioned contract was amended, according to which the government was allowed to terminate cooperation ahead of schedule.


Source: thebristolcable.org


In the summer of 2021 AWE will become a state owned British company under 100% government control. Source: en.wikipedia.org

In many ways, this step is associated with the maturing independence of the UK in the development of nuclear warheads. London plans to adopt new Dreadnought-class nuclear submarines in the next decade, in which the Trident II will be replaced by new, more advanced ICBMs. The estimated cost of the new Dreadnought is estimated at £ 31 billion.

It is planned to develop missile weapons for submarines using the technologies of the promising American W93 ICBM. It is worth emphasizing that only with the involvement of foreign technologies, and not blind copying of missiles, which, by the way, is prohibited by the Convention on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. It is for this reason that the British have taken back control of their own weapons of mass destruction from the hands of the Americans. After 28 years of "private ownership", British nuclear weapons will return to government hands.

This fact should be considered as another evidence of the return of the Cold War times. Key players in the global nuclear circle are qualitatively and quantitatively increasing their capabilities, and the UK will have to spend billions to stay in this elite club. And here there is no time to save on external asset management.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    10 November 2020 17: 18
    I did not know that the British were so tight-fisted (or know how to save a penny) that they gave nuclear weapons to private hands, well, well.
    1. 0
      10 November 2020 17: 56
      Quote: Merkit
      I did not know that the British were so tight-fisted (or know how to save a penny) that they gave nuclear weapons to private hands, well, well.

      Greed and greed ruined their world domination, and the process continues ..
      In general, he himself is in shock .. To see the Russian submarines got them passing constantly near the island)))))
      1. -1
        13 November 2020 13: 52
        Or maybe we haven’t nationalized it yet, will we have time to buy something interesting from “private traders” for “planned disposal” in the depths of Russian research institutes? wassat After all, they need money ... We will help the "partners" a little, we will take out all the trash, we will sort out electronics for precious metals ... laughing The capitalists sell everything, or am I wrong?

        A joke, of course.

        But giving the nuclear arsenal to private hands - and their analogue of our "Serdyukovism" did not pass, and even they overtook us in this! Now they want to give space launches completely into private (and raking, thieving) hands ...
        And when they come to their senses, they will understand that the Clintons and Biden have already sold everything (I, for example, about the Uranium One company, where the deal was personally supervised by the non-president) ...
  2. +6
    10 November 2020 17: 19
    In many ways, this step is associated with the maturing independence of the UK in the development of nuclear warheads. London plans to adopt new Dreadnought-class nuclear submarines in the next decade, in which the Trident II will be replaced by new, more advanced ICBMs. The estimated cost of the new Dreadnought is estimated at £ 31 billion.



    It started well and ended well with nonsense. What new missiles if the Dreadnought is American Columbia with the changes? There will be the same trident. And there is no such mbr w93. This is a promising warhead and is being developed only by rumors.
  3. +20
    10 November 2020 17: 54
    By the way, AWE specialists were involved in the investigation of the attempt on Alexander Litvinenko's life, and without their help, radioactive polonium in the body of the poisoned person would not have been detected.

    So who brought this polonium into the body ...
  4. +17
    10 November 2020 18: 02
    After 28 years of "private ownership", British nuclear weapons will return to government hands

    Even hardened capitalists resort to nationalization if necessary.
    1. Alf
      -1
      10 November 2020 18: 12
      Quote: mal
      After 28 years of "private ownership", British nuclear weapons will return to government hands

      Even hardened capitalists resort to nationalization if necessary.

      And without any special objections and completely calm.
    2. +1
      10 November 2020 18: 34
      Quote: mal
      Even hardened capitalists resort to nationalization if necessary.

      A wake-up call, however!
    3. 0
      13 November 2020 17: 48
      Quote: mal
      Even hardened capitalists resort to nationalization if necessary.

      So in Britain the "privatization-nationalization" swing is a long-standing tradition.
  5. +6
    10 November 2020 18: 15
    This fact should be considered as another evidence of the return of the Cold War times.

    And who said that it was over? recourse
    Someone there said that they won the Cold War? And you will bite the drip ...
  6. +1
    10 November 2020 18: 27
    Is it that the queen has completely fallen into poverty? And now it came to light that such things could not be trusted to just anyone, otherwise how would something come of it?
  7. -1
    10 November 2020 18: 39
    The W93 is not a rocket, but a nuclear charge for the future Mk-7RV warhead.
  8. 0
    10 November 2020 19: 21
    Soviet Union (USSR), Great Britain (United Kingdom, UK, UK)

    strike potential of Russia (Russia)

    to the investigation of the attempt on Alexander Litvinenko's life (Alexander Litvinenko),

    Who are these inserts in Latin for? Does the author hope that this opus will be read by English-speaking readers? So they will simply skip everything that is written in Russian, and these inserts do not carry information. Lining amerikosov? I'm afraid they won't. And we, smart Russians, do not need such delights.
  9. +14
    10 November 2020 23: 06
    Britain, as it can, clings to its former greatness, but ... Not that "mistress of the seas", not that ... negative
  10. -1
    11 November 2020 07: 25
    Quote: Mouse
    This fact should be considered as another evidence of the return of the Cold War times.

    And who said that it was over? recourse
    Someone there said that they won the Cold War? And you will bite the drip ...

    That war was won by the West.
    1. -1
      11 November 2020 09: 16
      Since you are on a Russian site, write in Russian, the power, though bourgeois, is Russian, where is their victory? Complete defeat looms, of course, but there are still chances to fix all the chances.
      1. Alf
        0
        11 November 2020 13: 06
        Quote: Essex62
        Complete defeat looms, of course, but there are still chances to fix all the chances.

        If you change the commander-in-chief and his entire general staff.
      2. +2
        11 November 2020 13: 59
        Quote: Essex62
        Since you are on a Russian site, write in Russian, the power, though bourgeois, is Russian, where is their victory? Complete defeat looms, of course, but there are still chances to fix all the chances.

        Signs of their victory:
        Their administration,
        Their currency and financial system.
        Huge contributions.
        Fulfillment of the condition for the reduction of the army.
        Reformatting the industry.
        Their rules for the development of the country.
        Concession to many industries.
        1. 0
          11 November 2020 15: 46
          I agree, but it has not yet reached the complete extermination of the nation. Now is the time to rectify the situation, as suggested by comrade Alf. I'm talking about that. 41 and 43, in modern interpretation.
  11. -1
    11 November 2020 07: 58
    Well, I would say .. that they shifted from one pocket to another! The United States and so they are essentially a colony .. well, right now, these COCKROACHES ... bite each other in the bank!
  12. +2
    12 November 2020 00: 16
    Author! Correct the text in the phrase
    It is planned to develop missile weapons for submarines using the technologies of a promising American ICBM W93.

    For the index W93 - this is not a designation for an SLBM, much less an ICBM (in fact, the term ICBM has always meant land-based missiles, and boat ones have always been designated SLBMs), but the designation of a combat unit

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"