Military Review

The Ministry of Defense has completed state tests of the new anti-submarine missile system "Answer"

101
The Ministry of Defense has completed state tests of the new anti-submarine missile system "Answer"

The Russian Navy will soon receive a new shipborne anti-submarine missile system. According to TASS, citing a source in the defense industry, the Otvet missile system has successfully completed state tests.


According to the source, the Answer anti-submarine missile system will be adopted by the Navy in December 2020 - January 2021, and technical documentation is currently being prepared.

State tests of the newest ship anti-submarine complex "Answer" have been successfully completed. They were conducted since 2019 from the board of the first serial frigate of project 22350 "Admiral Kasatonov"

- said the interlocutor of the agency, adding that the Ministry of Defense has already begun serial purchases of the complex.

The source said that the new complex will be equipped with most of the warships, including the missile cruiser Admiral Nakhimov, which is undergoing modernization.

Note that on October 28 this year, the press service of the Northern fleet announced the testing of the first production frigate of Project 22350 "Admiral Kasatonov" of a new anti-submarine missile. The tests were reportedly carried out at one of the Northern Fleet's sea ranges in the Barents Sea. The shooting was carried out as part of the qualification serial tests of the product and was recognized as successful.

At the beginning of September last year, Deputy Defense Minister Alexei Krivoruchko announced that a promising missile system "Answer" had been launched in pilot production. The tests were scheduled to be completed in 2020.

The new complex is an anti-submarine guided missile with a small-sized homing anti-submarine torpedo. For launch, universal launchers UKSK 3S14 are used. The firing range for surface ships is 40 km. The complex is designed for installation on ships of the frigate, corvette, and cruiser classes.


101 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Turanov
    Turanov 4 November 2020 09: 31
    +5
    Not a bad name, I hope the performance characteristics are appropriate hi
    1. Orange bigg
      Orange bigg 4 November 2020 10: 03
      16
      PLUR The answer is to protect surface ships from submarines. Thing! good The following is an explanation of what is the advantage of using PLUR.

      Mikhail Kofman, a leading expert of the Center for Naval Analysis, told Izvestia that for a modern warship there is nothing more deadly than a submarine. And there is no faster way to lose a ship than to let the submarine get within torpedo range.

      - No matter how large, sophisticated and technologically advanced surface ships are, submarines remain the main predators of the ocean, - the expert noted. “After all, submarines carry cruise missiles on board.


      The Zircon hypersonic missiles will receive impenetrable protection from submarines. The newest frigates of the "Admiral's series" - Project 22350 of the "Admiral Gorshkov" type - will be equipped with unique weapons to combat submarines. These ships will be the first in the Russian Navy to carry such powerful torpedo missiles. Unlike other means of fighting "steel sharks", these ammunition can hit targets within a radius of tens of kilometers, experts said.


      PLUR is the most dangerous weapon for submarines. Depth charges have low accuracy, and torpedoes have a relatively short range. The rocket can be launched for tens of kilometers. When it hits a given area, a small torpedo is separated from it, which independently searches for an underwater object and hits it.


      Project 22350 frigates have a large detection range, which allows them to effectively use torpedo missiles, ”the expert told Izvestia. - When you find a boat at a distance of 100 km, you must use this advantage. For a torpedo attack, she needs to approach a distance of 20 km, and you anticipate the actions of the submarine's crew.

      https://iz.ru/1080299/aleksei-ramm-roman-kretcul/spasti-admirala-nositelei-giperzvukovogo-oruzhiia-zashchitiat-ot-submarin
      1. novel66
        novel66 4 November 2020 10: 36
        +5
        amers for Mk48 Mod 5 has 38 km ... almost equal, then whoever hears before
        1. Orange bigg
          Orange bigg 4 November 2020 10: 38
          +1
          We always underestimate the performance characteristics of our products. wink Or do you think we do not know the performance characteristics of American torpedoes?
          1. novel66
            novel66 4 November 2020 10: 45
            +9
            and they, like lop-eared, so they laid out everything?
        2. Serg65
          Serg65 4 November 2020 11: 00
          17
          Quote: novel xnumx
          Amers for Mk48 Mod 5 have 38 km

          only the delivery speed is different, our courier will be faster wink
        3. sivuch
          sivuch 4 November 2020 11: 11
          +2
          This is the torpedo range
          1. novel66
            novel66 4 November 2020 11: 13
            +3
            Well, yes and what?
            1. sivuch
              sivuch 4 November 2020 11: 21
              +4
              And the fact that the real range depends on many factors and for some reason is almost always less in reality, often 2 or more times.
              1. novel66
                novel66 4 November 2020 11: 22
                +5
                and we have? everything is perfect? here probably, hydroacoustics decides
                1. Nosgoth
                  Nosgoth 7 November 2020 09: 59
                  0
                  "Answer" only at the final stage is submerged in the water (the small-sized torpedo itself), and does not go all the way under water.
        4. Charik
          Charik 4 November 2020 11: 34
          -1
          stupidly open the pikivedia-38 km is the 70s
          1. novel66
            novel66 4 November 2020 11: 35
            +3
            only worse then
        5. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 4 November 2020 11: 58
          10
          Quote: novel xnumx
          amers for Mk48 Mod 5 has 38 km ... almost equal, then whoever hears before

          Novel, hi
          It's time for words about.
          1. In 2008, the AMA adopted the MK-48 mod7, its GOS includes a broadband GAS with a digital beam former with directional characteristics, new software. This dramatically increased the effectiveness of the use of TO in unfavorable h / a conditions and the intensive use of interference by the enemy.
          The performance characteristics of torpedoes are classified, this is what is known: m = 1662,75 kg, l = 5,79m, d = 533 mm, V = 55,0 kn, D = ??? - they say about the cruising range "more than 40 km, and on the submarine - up to 8,0 km). At the same time, they weigh 292,5 kg of TGA or MS, that is, more than 540 kg of TNT!
          2. The boat hears NK earlier when comparing its own, on-board detectors. But there are nuances. Both the PL and NK have appeared GPBA ... But! the boat can dive under the jump layer, but NK? Put BUGAS there? For submarines, the greatest danger is represented by shipborne PLO helicopters, which operate 100-150 km from the carrier, and, as a rule, on the flanks of the KPUG search strip. The first maneuver of the submarine - leaving the search strip just substitutes it for helicopters. Therefore, here you need to be very sensitive to the popping of air from the blades, so as not to get into your ass ... Or launch missiles on the turntable, and detect your presence in the search area ... But this is an extreme measure. Most likely SRS and simulators to steer the dragonfly away from your exit course ...
          Therefore, PLCs, carriers of PLO helicopters and armed PLUROs are very serious even for Virgins. And if there are GPBA and LF emitters, and a "Delta" type prefix, then it's not a sin to hunt for them!
          IMHO.
          1. Vladimir Mitin_2
            Vladimir Mitin_2 4 November 2020 15: 57
            +1
            The author apparently does not know, approximately the same torpedo missiles appeared at the end of the 60s.
          2. Boris Chernikov
            Boris Chernikov 5 November 2020 09: 20
            -2
            By the way .. it was always interesting .. and the missile launcher is launched from the shoulder handles from MANPADS or is there some kind of anti-aircraft complex built into the submarine?
            1. Boa kaa
              Boa kaa 5 November 2020 14: 44
              +2
              Previously, it was the first option. Now it moves out on the bar and through the TLV the vizier finds and bangs on the aircraft.
              1. Boris Chernikov
                Boris Chernikov 5 November 2020 15: 39
                -2
                thanks for that)
      2. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 4 November 2020 11: 13
        15
        This comment carries a bunch of blunders.
        Quote: OrangeBigg
        for a modern warship, nothing is more deadly than a submarine. And there is no faster way to lose a ship than to let the submarine get within torpedo range.
        The submarine does not need to get close to torpedo strike distance, because she has an RCC, and she hears NK 2-3 times farther than he hears her. Sub-Harpoon with an underwater launch flies 130 km.
        The Zircon hypersonic missiles will receive impenetrable protection from submarines.
        The expression is incorrect: the carriers of the "Zircons" will receive protection, and the submarine itself does not fight the anti-ship missiles. She works on their carriers.
        will equip with unique weapons to combat submarines. These ships will become the first in the Russian Navy, on board which such powerful torpedo missiles will appear.
        Well, if you're an "expert," Mr. Kofman, you should know a little about the history of military shipbuilding. Look at Project 11540 and its PLURO (2х3 Waterfalls side by side!)
        When you find a boat at a distance of 100 km, you need to use this advantage. For a torpedo attack, she needs to approach a distance of 20 km, and you anticipate the actions of the submarine's crew.
        1. Such detection distances of NK-submarines only when using shipborne helicopters, or by external information sources / CU (VZOI)
        2. 20 km were taken, apparently, at the rate of 18 km TU + 2-3 km radius of the seeker ... But in general, the Mk-48 runs for 50 km. And I'm not at all sure that the American CEP will foolishly not launch it at full range, even without generating full firing data, and so, for good luck, counting on high performance characteristics of the product - in bearing to the target, well, maybe. another direction of movement will lay on maneuvering (angle of the second turn).
        3. It is possible to anticipate in the detection range, in the production of the launch, but not in the "actions of the crew". Maybe the enemy has carried out all the actions a long time ago and chooses amendments for firing a volley, how do you know that, dear Mr. Kofman (Damn, almost HOFMAN - well, a storyteller, and nothing more!)
        So, propaganda is good, but there may be children! (in the sense, "you also need to fuck your brains competently")
        AHA.
        1. novel66
          novel66 4 November 2020 11: 24
          +5
          meticulously noticed! hi
      3. Charik
        Charik 4 November 2020 11: 29
        +1
        Hypersonic missiles "Zircon" will receive impenetrable protection from submarines - what, whom? How will a missile protect itself from nuclear submarines - some kind of nonsense. The rocket can be launched for tens of kilometers. When it hits a given area, a small-sized torpedo separates from it, which independently searches for an underwater object and hits it, only the capture distance from the torpedo is probably 2 km and what will it find there? Well, I found a submarine beyond 100 km and something into the water, and the nuclear submarine in the NK has already launched the Harpoon flock from 100 km and will not help PLURA with D-40 km, the range of MK-48 mod3 81g.v.-50 km at 40 knots, it was 2020-MK48 mod7 release since 2008-who needs it at 20 km approach the goal wassat
        1. Lex_is
          Lex_is 4 November 2020 12: 11
          +1
          I meant the carrier of the "Zircon", which is clearly not superfluous protection from submarines.
          1. Charik
            Charik 4 November 2020 14: 14
            -1
            so the carriers of Zircons will not become "impenetrable" -because a new PLUR for them was invented with a range of 40 km and a range of a detachable torpedo 10 km with guidance km 2
            1. Lex_is
              Lex_is 4 November 2020 14: 47
              +1
              Of course they won't.
              But such an unattainable goal was never set.
              The goal was to replace the somewhat obsolete "Waterfall" since the 60s, requiring a hefty 533 mm torpedo tubes for a more versatile solution using the UKSK.
              1. Charik
                Charik 4 November 2020 14: 52
                0
                Adopted in 81g, in fact, at least once they were not used for training? This is the same thing, but if the enemy torpedo is on the way, how to fight back? It would be better to make an anti-torpedo weapon.
      4. vVvAD
        vVvAD 5 November 2020 16: 25
        0
        For those who are not in the know: further development of the "Package" complex - but now inside the PLUR in the UVP.
    2. Thrifty
      Thrifty 4 November 2020 11: 28
      +3
      Money for the fish again am ! THIS IS A ROCKET-TORPED COMPLEX, not a missile one, as you have in your article! The difference is huge! !! negative
      1. Charik
        Charik 4 November 2020 14: 23
        0
        Or maybe there are a lot of anti-submarine missile system with anti-submarine guided missile-variant, how not to name-the essence of this will not change-the sense of it against the nuclear submarines of Virginia or Siful, perhaps 0, can our NKs in 50 km passively detect the YUSA nuclear submarine? if not, get MK 48. Can our NKs in the active GAS mode detect the YUSA nuclear submarine behind 100 km? if not, fire back at the anti-ship missile.
        1. d4rkmesa
          d4rkmesa 5 November 2020 08: 28
          0
          It is not necessary to reduce everything to the NK - Premier League duel. The nuclear submarine can detect a carrier not equipped with means of destruction. Network center (for the Russian Navy is still fantastic, but nonetheless). In general, to all appearances, "Answer" is the same 91P1, i.e. all were taken to exhibitions and finally adopted.
    3. iouris
      iouris 4 November 2020 16: 31
      0
      Quote: Turanov
      Not a bad name,

      "Answer"!
    4. the Saint
      the Saint 5 November 2020 20: 59
      -1
      Quote: Turanov
      Not a bad name, I hope the performance characteristics are appropriate

      Something recent reminds

      The DPRK announced that it is ready to sink the American nuclear submarine Michigan, which has arrived on the coast of South Korea.
      Pyongyang stressed that if the crew of the submarine tries to take at least some hostile action, the submarine will "fly apart into pieces of molten metal."
      "It will not be able to rise to the surface, as it will meet a miserable end, turning only into a sea spirit," writes the North Korean portal Compatriots of Our Nation, which is the mouthpiece of the government.
  2. Lionnvrsk
    Lionnvrsk 4 November 2020 09: 39
    11
    complex "Answer" have been successfully completed. They were carried out from the board of the first serial frigate of project 22350 "Admiral Kasatonov"

    And why the heck was the 2015 photo of the year, where the RCVP Samum Mosquito banged on a surface target? request
    1. Tugarin
      Tugarin 4 November 2020 10: 25
      22
      Quote: LIONnvrsk
      And why the heck was the 2015 photo of the year, where the RCVP Samum Mosquito banged on a surface target?

      Confuse a potential enemy smile
    2. novel66
      novel66 4 November 2020 10: 37
      +2
      for conspiracy, you need to understand! bully
  3. Operator
    Operator 4 November 2020 09: 40
    -4
    Nice (to start) blue pony ass wick bully
  4. Siberian 66
    Siberian 66 4 November 2020 09: 41
    +8
    I hope 40 km. range is it for the press? And then the Mark 48 is already 50 km away. range has .. in open sources again ..
    1. Serg65
      Serg65 4 November 2020 09: 50
      +8
      Quote: Sibiryak 66
      I hope 40 km. range is it for the press?

      Open source range flight from 5 to 50 km, with 50 km in 2 minutes with a 0,9 hit probability!
      Will such performance characteristics suit you?
      1. La Peruse
        La Peruse 4 November 2020 10: 05
        -4
        It won't suit me. What kind of detection and guidance complex will this device use? The development is quite old. In polygon conditions, it is possible and there are 0.9 lesions. What about reality?
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 4 November 2020 10: 41
          -6
          Quote: La Peruse
          What kind of detection and guidance complex will this device use? The development is quite old. In polygon conditions, it is possible and there are 0.9 lesions. What about reality?

          laughing In short, full manure, I understand you !!!!
          1. La Peruse
            La Peruse 4 November 2020 11: 21
            -2
            In fact, there is something to object? Development of the 90s of the last century! The fact that We are lagging behind in the detection and tracking complexes is a well-known fact. So range shooting in ideal conditions (where we often screw up) is not a fact!
            1. Narak-zempo
              Narak-zempo 4 November 2020 12: 02
              -2
              Quote: La Peruse
              The fact that We are lagging behind in detection and tracking complexes is a well-known fact

              Our target designation systems will be cooler if telepathists and psychics are connected to them. The laws of hydroacoustics or the opacity of water for radio waves do not apply to them - both the location and plans are considered directly from the heads of the enemy officers.
              Even Madeleine Albright was "scanned" at one time: https://rg.ru/2006/12/22/gosbezopasnostj-podsoznanie.html
              laughing laughing laughing
              1. La Peruse
                La Peruse 4 November 2020 12: 10
                -5
                Oh yeah!!! There is such a thing !!! New physical principles, etc. and so on. Ignoring all the laws of Newton, Fermi, and so on ... I wonder why we have not bent the whole world and the ruble is not the world currency.
              2. Charik
                Charik 4 November 2020 14: 54
                -1
                rent-so many of these wonderful people showed-that there is no need for rockets wassat
            2. Serg65
              Serg65 4 November 2020 13: 16
              +3
              Quote: La Peruse
              Development of the 90s of the last century!

              Those. you have no complaints about the Mark 48 of the 60s, just admiration?
              In the mid-90s, Novator lived only thanks to Indian orders, and the PLRK Answer, unlike Club-S and Club-N, is the brainchild of the 2000s. 0,9 is a defeat with an RMS targeting error of 300-500 meters, it is difficult to call such parameters ideal conditions!
              Quote: La Peruse
              We are lagging behind in detection and tracking complexes

              I do not argue, but the work is going on, which is confirmed by the appearance of the Minotaur, the work on the creation of the Irtysh-Amphora State Joint-Stock Company, the modernization of the Zarya, and is developing a new K-65 deck helicopter.
              1. La Peruse
                La Peruse 4 November 2020 13: 37
                -4
                Mk48 ... Considering how much it was poured into for modernization ... This is not the same torpedo. Initially, the anti-malodic one turned into an unvirsal one !!! Unfortunately, not a single torpedo of the USSR has ever become non-versatile. As far as I remember, the anti-submarine man (correct if you made a mistake)
                1. Serg65
                  Serg65 4 November 2020 14: 15
                  +3
                  Quote: La Peruse
                  As far as I can remember, the anti-submarine operator

                  Yes, anti-submarine, but more warhead-5
                  Quote: La Peruse
                  Unfortunately, not a single torpedo of the USSR ever became non-versatile.

                  And this is a question for Comrade Ustinov! 53-65 was a torpedo Kalashnikov and the military-industrial complex was reluctant to invent and introduce new products into production. The opinion of the fleet in those days was of little concern. SET-65 was also created on the basis of 53-65 and is still in service today. USET-80, as an analogue of MK-48, could be called universal, but its revision dragged on until the collapse of the USSR.
                  1. La Peruse
                    La Peruse 4 November 2020 14: 31
                    -2
                    USET-80 agrees ... It took too long to finish 53-65 ... Kalashnikov ... Frankly, 65-76 does not pull much better. It's a pity they removed from service instead of finalizing ... This is my opinion
                2. Vladimir Mitin_2
                  Vladimir Mitin_2 4 November 2020 16: 02
                  0
                  USET - 81 - universal electric, self-guided
              2. Lex_is
                Lex_is 4 November 2020 15: 02
                0
                PLRC Answer, unlike Club-S and Club-N, the brainchild of the 2000s


                This is a further development of the Club, with a 91RE1 rocket and a warhead, in the form of the same small-sized MPT-1UM torpedo created in 1978.
        2. sivuch
          sivuch 4 November 2020 11: 17
          +2
          I hope you understand that in non-polygon, i.e. combat conditions, PLUR has not yet been used. Therefore, the question is meaningless.
          The range of 40 km was easily given out by the ancient polygon on Project 1155, and later by ed. Star in different trim levels
          1. La Peruse
            La Peruse 4 November 2020 11: 37
            -3
            Range and efficiency are very different things.
            1. sivuch
              sivuch 4 November 2020 15: 14
              +1
              Could you translate this into Russian? I know what the detection range of a typical target is with a given probability. What is detection efficiency, I unfortunately don't know
              1. La Peruse
                La Peruse 4 November 2020 15: 19
                -2
                It meant the effectiveness of hitting the target. To discover is not to amaze ...
        3. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 4 November 2020 13: 18
          +3
          Quote: La Peruse
          What kind of detection and guidance complex will this device use?

          Naturally aviation! The Ka-27PL can detect, give a place, even the side of movement and slip to the side when launching the PLUR, and you can also sow the RGAB field and shoot according to their data; and even the direction of movement, if you're lucky ... A torpedo will choose an error in the submarine's location, searching along a diverging spiral.
          1. La Peruse
            La Peruse 4 November 2020 13: 46
            0
            So for this you need to build something like 1123 !!! That's who could really create problems. We have safely written them off ... Everything that is now from the NK cannot be provided even by our own PLO! Unfortunately, the RGAB was not massively used in the Navy, saving money ... As a submarine, you know the lag in detection and tracking systems, or rather in their application
            1. Lex_is
              Lex_is 4 November 2020 14: 01
              +1
              for this you need to build something like 1123

              But why? 1123 is a very specific solution, morally obsolete even at the construction stage, despite its outstanding
              those years, the ability to combat submarines.
      2. Jacket in stock
        Jacket in stock 4 November 2020 10: 30
        +1
        Firing range
        From a submarine 5-50 km, from a depth of 20-50 m.
        From above water 40 km.
      3. novel66
        novel66 4 November 2020 10: 38
        +1
        and on their boats, what is the range of promising missiles? lovers of baltic tea hello hi
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 4 November 2020 10: 52
          0
          Quote: novel xnumx
          What is the range of promising missiles?

          What direction of the missile are you interested in? What are you going to fire?
          Hello Sam lovers! hi
          1. novel66
            novel66 4 November 2020 10: 54
            +2
            which direction of the rocket

            north-south
            1. Serg65
              Serg65 4 November 2020 10: 59
              +2
              Quote: novel xnumx
              north-south

              Well, they fly not far, they get confused in the direction! wassat
              1. novel66
                novel66 4 November 2020 11: 01
                +2
                so dangerous, you don't know where to wait
    2. mark1
      mark1 4 November 2020 10: 05
      +6
      Range 40 km - the range of delivery of the torpedo, and then depends on the characteristics of the torpedo.
      1. La Peruse
        La Peruse 4 November 2020 10: 20
        -4
        That is, in fact, the boat will have time to release a torpedo. Well, nafig such a plrkt
        1. sivuch
          sivuch 4 November 2020 11: 18
          +2
          That is, in fact, the boat will have time to release a torpedo.
          How will the sunken boat provide telecontrol?
          1. La Peruse
            La Peruse 4 November 2020 11: 25
            -3
            Immediately I remember WWII !!! Not any control body ... And yes, modern torpedoes need body control mainly to deal with their own kind. Against NK, the body does not really need control
            1. sivuch
              sivuch 4 November 2020 11: 26
              +3
              That is, for a distance of more than 15-20 km and without TU? I wish you success.
              1. La Peruse
                La Peruse 4 November 2020 11: 33
                -2
                And what the good old acoustic ones have already been canceled? Or do you not know how the Tsaunkenengs worked? And do not use CLOs? So almost all torpedoes are equipped with Saptfires.
                1. sivuch
                  sivuch 4 November 2020 11: 45
                  +1
                  And that the good old acoustic ones have already been canceled
                  not canceled. and the wake was not canceled. I wrote to you about the range for a reason. And then there are false targets for acoustic seeker. So there is no way without TR at long distances.
                  1. La Peruse
                    La Peruse 4 November 2020 11: 56
                    -4
                    Remember what the submarines were originally created for !!! Oddly enough, but the attack of the combat NKs is a secondary goal.
                    1. sivuch
                      sivuch 4 November 2020 15: 18
                      +1
                      We recall how this discussion began - with the assertion that the range of the PLUR of 40 km is insufficient with the range of the macaque-48 of 50 km
                      1. La Peruse
                        La Peruse 4 November 2020 15: 20
                        -4
                        If it really isn't enough. Then what is it about?
              2. Charik
                Charik 4 November 2020 15: 02
                -3
                dibil only 20 km on the nuclear submarine will come to the NK, anti-ship missiles range-100 km-torpedo-50 km, and think about how the PLUR for 40 km will help.
          2. Charik
            Charik 4 November 2020 15: 00
            -1
            but how to sink it with PLUR? - while it flies, the boat will leave the place where the torpedo was launched and driving along the wire will drive 48yu into the NK, the range of the SSN torpedo from the PLUR is not 5 km - if 2 km is good
    3. Pashhenko Nikolay
      Pashhenko Nikolay 4 November 2020 10: 34
      +1
      And tomahawks have an even greater range. I can't even imagine who would decide to attack enemy warships with torpedoes. Only the convoys are defenseless.
  5. Serg65
    Serg65 4 November 2020 09: 47
    +3
    Well, the "Sizzling" has replenished the gauge line! And the performance characteristics are impressive!
    1. novel66
      novel66 4 November 2020 10: 44
      +2
      response implies action ... late
      1. Serg65
        Serg65 4 November 2020 11: 02
        +3
        Quote: novel xnumx
        late

        in rocket torpedoes we are ahead of the rest! V.S. Vysotsky! yes
        1. novel66
          novel66 4 November 2020 11: 09
          +5
          in rocket torpedoes we are much longer ...
  6. rocket757
    rocket757 4 November 2020 09: 52
    +1
    Trivial, the answer must be effective.
    The boom is to think that it is.
    1. novel66
      novel66 4 November 2020 10: 44
      +2
      better to double-check ...
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 4 November 2020 10: 49
        +1
        Hello Roman soldier
        New weapons do not exist without the fact that they would not have to be modified. The more complex it is, the more it is subject to it.
      2. Serg65
        Serg65 4 November 2020 11: 03
        +2
        Quote: novel xnumx
        better to double-check ...

        And why are you, Roman, actually interested? Is it a spy? what
        1. novel66
          novel66 4 November 2020 11: 08
          +1
          and we, Sergey Petrovich, have a presentiment of a catch in everything tongue
          1. Serg65
            Serg65 4 November 2020 11: 10
            +1
            This, Roman Petrovich, can negatively affect your digestive tract ... although premonitions can be deceiving! tongue
            1. novel66
              novel66 4 November 2020 11: 11
              +1
              nothing can stop me from eating
              1. Serg65
                Serg65 4 November 2020 11: 14
                +2
                Some kind of inconsistency .... some here on VO say that for years now a finger instead of sausage, and you are eating like a frightened ... I don't understand anything .. but it's interesting !!!! lol
                1. novel66
                  novel66 4 November 2020 11: 15
                  +2
                  maybe such a diet? I'm not going to lose weight
  7. maiman61
    maiman61 4 November 2020 10: 33
    +1
    And I would give the name "Hello"!
    1. novel66
      novel66 4 November 2020 10: 55
      +2
      this is more logical, even better - unexpected
  8. Vladshat
    Vladshat 4 November 2020 10: 47
    +2
    The old PLUR “Trumpet-B” flew away at 55 km. And what does the Zircon rocket have to do with it if it flies 50 km in 2 minutes? It's not even Mach 1,5. And the Zircon rocket makes 8 Machs. Most likely it was a missile ,, Caliber ,,
  9. egor1712
    egor1712 4 November 2020 11: 37
    -2
    Always surprised by our designers, golden hands. But even more delighted were the experts who gave the name to the new types of weapons. And this time "Answered" is the answer.
    1. Charik
      Charik 4 November 2020 15: 05
      -1
      and even more surprising is the madmen who cannot balance the fleet and shove everything in a row where it is not necessary
  10. Lex_is
    Lex_is 4 November 2020 11: 50
    0
    Very good news, despite all the delusion of the experts.

    The main and most important thing in the Answer is the launch from the UKSK 3S14 and the unification of weapons systems.
    This is very important and necessary.

    As for the nonsense of destroying only 40 km away, it will destroy the enemy no further than the GAS or radar detects him.
  11. ficus2003
    ficus2003 4 November 2020 12: 22
    -1
    Quote: OrangeBigg
    PLUR The answer is to protect surface ships from submarines.

    F21 ARTEMIS (FRANCE) - torpedo, range - 50 km, and the Russian "answer" - 40 km.
    1. Lex_is
      Lex_is 4 November 2020 12: 39
      -1
      This is not important.
      The range of application will still be less than 40, both for them and for us.
    2. Charik
      Charik 4 November 2020 14: 30
      -1
      do not write nonsense, F21 is a torpedo, and the ANSWER is a PLUR with a flight range of 40 km and a detachable universal small-sized torpedo that will pass a maximum of 10 km behind a captured target - if it captures a target with its CLS km by 2
      1. The comment was deleted.
  12. Charik
    Charik 4 November 2020 14: 26
    -2
    Interestingly, at least once the Waterfall, Blizzard, Blizzard-in world practice-shot in real combat and there are results?
    1. Vladimir Mitin_2
      Vladimir Mitin_2 4 November 2020 16: 08
      0
      You need to know the history, and the Titanic
  13. Charik
    Charik 4 November 2020 15: 07
    -3
    Where are you-Ottoman_Mouse, you put a minus, and why don't you write for what
  14. faterdom
    faterdom 4 November 2020 16: 05
    -2
    "The answering machine is talking to you. After the dial tone, leave your last message!"