In China: The world can see the debut of the first Chinese strategic stealth bomber by 2025

China has adopted a program for the development of the military sphere for the next five years - from 2021 to 2025. This program is part of the national plan of the PRC to improve the economy and security system of the country.

Some details of the program providing for the development of the country's armed forces and modernization appeared in the Chinese press. weapons and military equipment.

From a Chinese press report:

China will develop and manufacture advanced weapons and equipment over the next five years. The world in the next five years, until 2025, may see the debut of China's first strategic long-range stealth bomber.

At the moment, the strategic aviation The Chinese Air Force is represented by Xian H-6 bombers in their various modifications. In fact, this is a Chinese copy of the Soviet Tu-16 strategic bomber, which made its first flight back in the early 1950s.

Recently, China has been developing its own strategic bomber. But at the same time, there are obvious problems in the PRC. These problems are associated with the bomber's engines, as well as with its ability to remain invisible to the radar of a potential enemy. There is no data yet on how successfully Chinese specialists are coping with these problems, so that by 2025 the first stealth "strategist" of the PLA Air Force, as announced, would rise into the sky.

However, the task for the 14th Chinese five-year plan has been set, and every effort will undoubtedly be made to its solution.

In the Chinese five-year program for the development of the army and fleet it is also said that in the course of the five-year plan it is planned to put into service the first aircraft carrier with an electromagnetic catapult.

Comments

[bar]

The world can see the debut of the first Chinese strategic stealth bomber by 2025

Here, as in the joke about the blonde and the dinosaur, 50/50. He may or may not see. Especially if he is "stealth"

[Runoway]

The anecdote is that once farmers with rags in their hands, not so long ago in the 70s, before the age of 25, the first stealth bomber of their own promises to take off (like a global leap of democracy from Uncle Tom's hut to Barack Obama), but we have a packa, it is not known at all in front of us or not.
Moreover, judging by the level of development of the fleet, there is no doubt in the Chinese aircraft

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: Runoway

not so long ago in the 70s, before the 25th year already promises to take off the first own stealth bomber

That's strange. With engines they "are not so simple." J-31 slips too. But the new strategic bomber will be presented ahead of the rest. And what engines will be on it?
So, as they say, there are more questions than answers.

[Orange bigg]

Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich

Quote: Runoway

not so long ago in the 70s, before the 25th year already promises to take off the first own stealth bomber

That's strange. With engines they "are not so simple." J-31 slips too. But the new strategic bomber will be presented ahead of the rest. And what engines will be on it?
So, as they say, there are more questions than answers.

Surely the Chinese wanted to install the Ukrainian D-18T on their strategist. If they install Russian engines on their fighters, then why not put the Ukrainian engine on the strategist? It was not for nothing that the Chinese bought Motor Sich, but they never did.

[Avior]

The Chinese plan to produce, together with Motor, a version with an increased capacity of the AI-38 at a plant in Chongqing.

[Orange bigg]

Quote: Runoway

The anecdote is that once farmers with rags in their hands, not so long ago in the 70s, before the age of 25, the first stealth bomber of their own promises to take off (like a global leap of democracy from Uncle Tom's hut to Barack Obama), but we have a packa, it is not known at all in front of us or not.
Moreover, judging by the level of development of the fleet, there is no doubt in the Chinese aircraft

Americans were at least revered at their leisure, rather than making ridiculous parallels between the development of the Chinese navy and the construction of strategic bombers. Where is the logic?

At present, the first prototype of the PAK DA is being created at one of the factories in the Russian Federation. Parts sourcing and pre-fabrication of smaller parts will be completed by 2021. Some progress has been made in the construction of the cockpit. The Kazan Aviation Plant named after Gorbunov is already preparing a test range, the first flight of the newest aircraft is planned to be performed in 2025–2026, and serial production is scheduled for 2028–2029.

The experts of the American edition noted that the main part of the Russian aviation modernization program involves the further development of proven models. But the PAK DA is built using a completely new technology, and many of its characteristics are kept secret.

It is known that the Russian stealth bomber will be able to fly over a distance of 12 km, its payload is 000-25 tons and it develops subsonic speed.

https://rueconomics.ru/474911-nashi-samolety-pozadi-zapad-priznal-prevoskhodstvo-rossiiskogo-pak-da

[Insurgent]

In China: The world can see the debut of the first Chinese strategic stealth bomber by 2025

Where are the drawings? At least sketches, sketches?
The Chinese love to predict what certain foreign developments might be, but they did not depict their plane ...

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: bar

Here, as in the joke about the blonde and the dinosaur, 50/50. He may or may not see. Especially if he is "stealth"

I don't know what the world will see there by 2025, but looking at how China is developing, we can say with confidence that the Chinese are lucky with the leaders of the state.

[iouris]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

the Chinese were lucky with the leaders of the state.

Do you want to become Chinese?

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: iouris

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

the Chinese were lucky with the leaders of the state.

Do you want to become Chinese?

Well this is what brains you need to have to draw such a conclusion.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

Well this is what brains you need to have to draw such a conclusion.

None, for such conclusions a brain is not needed.

[iouris]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

What kind of brains you need to have to

Quote: aleksejkabanets

no brain is needed for such conclusions.

You worked collectively, so I answer both at once.
I think that you know very little about China and its leaders, especially since China is a rather closed country with a specific history and culture.
You are a Russian, you envy the Chinese. And why only the Chinese, and not the Americans (USA), Germans (FRG) or, for example, Abramovich?
One could understand your desire to learn something from others, but envy is something special ...
Note.
Envy is a socio-psychological construct / concept that encompasses a number of different forms of social behavior and feelings that arise in relation to those who possess something (tangible or intangible) that the envy wants to possess, but does not possess.
PS ... and, most likely, will never have (!)

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: iouris

You are a Russian, you envy the Chinese.

Well, what kind of brains do you need to have to draw such a conclusion?
For those who are especially gifted with brains, I explain - this is not envy, this is a statement of fact.
Compare what China was like 30 years ago and what it is today.
What is this talking about? About the quality of China's leadership.

Quote: iouris

China is a rather closed country

Regardless, we know that China is building aircraft carriers, and we are just corvettes. for which we buy engines from the Chinese.
And 30 years ago it was the other way around.
This is what leaders mean for the country.

[Alien From]

I will add a little, the Chinese people themselves are disciplined and hardworking.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Alien From

I will add a little, the Chinese people themselves are disciplined and hardworking.

A good shepherd has a good flock.
Compare our people under Stalin and his labor and military exploits and under Gorby. With his "exploits"

[Alien From]

It is better not to mention the marked one at all, there are no censorship words!

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Alien From

It is better not to mention the marked one at all, there are no censorship words!

Sorry. I won't do it anymore.

[Alien From]

No problem. I think the majority of members of the forum are of the same opinion.

[Clear]

The world can see the debut of the first Chinese strategic stealth bomber by 2025

With such a rate of armament, there are fears that we all will not see 2025

[Thrifty]

Will there be stealth engines on it too? ?? Like a gopher in a field, or like honey in a pot of Winnie-the-Pooh - "it seems like it is, but it doesn't seem like it" !!!

[Thrifty]

In addition to the minuses, there are no other arguments for the sect of those praying for the Chinese. ...

[Borz]

Does China have sufficient experience in self-development of high power aircraft engines for such applications ?! I'm not an expert, maybe I missed something?

[Borz]

and we have a pack, it is not known at all whether it will appear before us or not.
Moreover, judging by the level of development of the fleet, there is no doubt in the Chinese aircraft


Well, it is clear from whom the cons went. I AM NOT A SPECIALIST in aviation, I asked more knowledgeable colleagues. I don't know about aviation, but merchant ships built in Chinese shipyards are something ...

[alesi13]

Merchant ships are great, but a nuclear icebreaker can? That's the difference

[eklmn]

“Merchant ships are great, but can a nuclear icebreaker be able to? "
And they don't need an icebreaker! Russia will not need it either by 2024 due to the very fast ice melting. Russia is already adjusting plans for their construction. So the icebreakers will be anchored and turned into power stations / hotels / casinos ...

[alesi13]

The question is, why do we need a lot of merchant ships? Q24 is summer coming?

[eklmn]

"A question of competence ..."
From Wiki:
“As of March 2019, China has 46 operating nuclear reactors with a capacity of 42,8 GW and 11 nuclear reactors under construction with a capacity of 10,8 GW. Additional reactors will provide an additional 36 GW. ”
First place in the world for the number of ... So not exactly fools ...!

[eklmn]

Maybe I'm wrong - I didn't look who built them. Now Russia is building, but I don’t know who built the previous ones.

[Borz]

Quote: Alesi13

Merchant ships are great, but a nuclear icebreaker can? That's the difference

Sorry for the ambiguity, I wanted to say that Chinese-built merchant ships are trash.

[mvg]

Merchant ships are great, but a nuclear icebreaker can?

They massively build nuclear submarines, cruisers 055, destroyers 052, frigates / corvettes 054, type 001 aircraft carriers. This is an order of magnitude more difficult than the Leader. Do you have doubts? Moreover, the first nuclear icebreakers for the USSR were built by Finland, not like today's China.
PS: So "That's the difference," ask yourself more than once.

[alesi13]

Are the Finns building right now? Well, they build in large quantities, but do they build well? What is not very good with stealth

[New Year day]

For some reason I believe it

[Lexus]

Sylvester ,
do not care about the Chinese. Our already "for happiness" remember how the Tu-160 is made. And that is not enough. There is no need to even talk about PAK YES - it will be only in the "wet" dreams of urya-skakuas and other "believers" for a long time - so much progress the regression is obvious.

[Thrifty]

Lexus, and now the Yankees collect Tu160 in Kazan? What to remember when people work without leaving their hands? ??

[Lexus]

And did you collect a lot?

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Thrifty

when people work without leaving their hands? ??

Is this a Freudian slip?

[parusnik]

I would not be surprised if it appears, it is true, the Chinese version ... but still ..

[Lexus]

Alexey ,
the Chinese have grown a lot in technology and quality. Especially when they do it for themselves.

[parusnik]

The Chinese are growing up, and we are also growing down .. We noticed that we have the same platforms for tanks, planes ..

[Lexus]

On the part of cheating and "throwing dust in the eyes" - to "ours" all long away "deep".

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: parusnik

The Chinese are growing up, and we are also growing down ..

Negative growth is the same growth. I just don't want to get used to it.

[bar]

Quote: Runoway

judging by the level of development of the fleet, there is no doubt in the Chinese aircraft

What does the fleet have to do with it? Or are you hinting that the problems with aviation in China are the same as in Russia with the fleet? Then this is exactly what raises doubts about a Chinese plane.

[Svarog]

If the Chinese have conceived, they will definitely do it, and in the scheduled time ... only engines will probably buy from us ..

[Smirnoff]

Yes, their engines are a weak point.

[Naughty]

Quote: Insurgent

In China: The world can see the debut of the first Chinese strategic stealth bomber by 2025

Where are the drawings? At least sketches, sketches?
The Chinese love to predict what certain foreign developments might be, but they did not depict their plane ...

Yes, here, as in the whole world, there are only show-off Key word can see and then fantasize on your health as they say

[Mountain shooter]

"... I love our plans huge!" - shiver, striped imperialist! Invisible strategists will bomb you into the stone age!

[Vadim237]

Do not disappoint the Chinese - copy-paste B2 should be rolled out for takeoff.

[silver_roman]

stealth technology is the only 5th generation aircraft technology that China has mastered. he also makes his "fifth" generation of fighters. that's just except for the stele there is nothing else ... just our engines.

[Evgeny Seleznev]

And the funniest thing is that they have a vinaigrette of Russian and American solutions. And over time it will grow to an independent model. The guys do not have principles for intellectual property rights. Copyright.

[Vsevolod136]

Quote: author

Chinese copy of the Soviet Tu-16 strategic bomber, which made its first flight back in the early 1950s.
Recently, China has been developing its own strategic bomber

This means the mice have severely refused cheese - they themselves began to produce "parmesan"

[agoran]

The Chinese can copy anything they want, but not technology.
They have a problem with materials science, so aircraft engines have a small resource.

[Generator Systems]

It will be interesting to buy it on Alik In general, well done, it will be a 100% new vision of this weapon)

[Motorhead]

Here one clown laughed at the mattress covers and talked nonsense about trampolines, now the muzzle sits and is silent. There is definitely no doubt about the Chinese people. Sooner or later, the engine is dazzled and everything else, the resources they have above the roof.

[Al_lexx]

As I already wrote more than once, on different resources:
- The world has two possibilities, and a half. Or everyone can become Jews, which is not always easy, or Russians, which is quite possible. Those who pass by these opportunities will become Chinese.
If, in essence, the article is, then the PRC is rapidly building up its military power, despite their losses in tank biathlon. In the same America, with its population of about 3000 million, about 10 million Chinese live. Even if, out of ten, one is an active combatant, then the City on the Hill will face serious trouble. Yes, and there are also ameroafras raging, and the white majority is ready ...