Thanks to new reconnaissance means, the military of the RF Armed Forces hit targets 2,5 times faster

The introduction of new special equipment has significantly expanded the capabilities of Russian military intelligence. And the time between the detection of the target and the strike on it was reduced by 2,5 times.

This was told by the Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Ground Forces for reconnaissance, Major General Alexey Belousov in interview the newspaper of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation "Krasnaya Zvezda", published today.

Using new technology, reconnaissance is now capable of revealing enemy targets to the full depth of the zone of responsibility in real time. Scouts use unmanned aerial vehicles, radar devices capable of determining targets in any weather conditions, the latest radio stations, as well as the Strelets-M reconnaissance, control and communication systems (KRUS) to solve their tasks. And seismic sensors allow you to track the movement of enemy equipment and military personnel. All incoming data is immediately processed, transmitted and taken into account.

According to Major General Belousov, all this modern technology allows you to save the lives of personnel.

In conclusion, he congratulated the military intelligence officers on their professional holiday, which will be celebrated soon, on November 5.

Comments

[tralflot1832]

And this is good, and the issuance of the order to parade, according to intelligence, in Russian folk will speed up the time of meeting with the goddess Volhalla at times.

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: tralflot1832

giving the order for parading, according to intelligence, in Russian folk will speed up the time

Issuing an order should look like a "confirm" mark on a combat situation display device. This will really speed up.

[tralflot1832]

Captain, I dropped the target coordinate on your tablet! Destroy! Yes! This is how it should look ideally. Judging by the training frames, this is what we strive for!

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: tralflot1832

Ideally, this is how it should look.

No, not at all.
The captain must see this target simultaneously with the one who "throws off" its coordinates. The commander must simply identify it as a target and mark it as "destroy". And that's all. The whole process is 0 point, zero tenths after the decision is made.

[tralflot1832]

I’m talking about the same, on the mark of defeat there should be someone who smacks, the amount of ammunition, the type of ammunition, the time of fire and the area of ​​withdrawal after the order was carried out. I see the tablets even at the commander of the battery, but we do not know what is removed there.

[BARKAS]

Captain I sent you the target coordinate on your tablet! Destroy! Yes! This is how it should look ideally

Not really, if the coordinates are already in the tablet, then its serial number is simply indicated in the same tablet or by radio.

[svp67]

Quote: tralflot1832

Captain, I sent you the target coordinate on your tablet!

And how many "captains" should he have in touch at this moment? The targets identified may be different for different artillery systems.

[tralflot1832]

The target marker should indicate which captain is shooting. By the way, the same bullshit on the other side. Time is above all.

[svp67]

Quote: tralflot1832

The target marker should indicate which captain is shooting.

This is called "network-centric warfare". And it is not the scout's business to indicate who will shoot where and when, it should be decided by Nacart on the launcher.

[Victor_B]

the time between the detection of the target and the strike on it was reduced by 2,5 times.

And in comparison with amerovskoy?
Oh, I really want to believe that it's not worse! ...

[Victor_B]

In our canteen, cooking is even better ...
(and added to the silence of the audience)
For connoisseurs, a joke ...
(M. Zhvanetsky)

[svp67]

This is just fine, but if there is no reliable "umbrella" of air defense, all this super excellent equipment turns into super targets.
And in general, who thought of making the antenna so bright at the ZOO?

[Maki maki]

Quote: svp67

if there is no reliable "umbrella" of air defense, all this super excellent equipment turns into super targets

Yes, that's understandable. Let's hope that the "air" control is also practiced. Especially in light of recent events.

[GTYCBJYTH2021]

[quote = svp67] This is just fine, but if there is no reliable "umbrella" of air defense, all this super great technique turns into super targets.
And in general, who thought of making the antenna so bright at the ZOO? [The military came up with, maybe that general, they love everything shiny, polished ...

[Operator]

Especially the time of hitting targets with Russian weapons was reduced in Karabakh - from 2,5 to 1 year

[Rudkovsky]

Actually, not 2.5 times, but 2500 times.

[ficus2003]

Quote: Victor_B

the time between the detection of the target and the impact on it was reduced by 2,5 times

Quote: Victor_B

And in comparison with amerovskoy?
Oh, I really want to believe that it's not worse! ...

Still not saying - has decreased by 2,5 times compared to what year? 2018? 2010? 1991?

[Gunther]

Quote: Author

And seismic sensors allow you to track the movement of enemy equipment and military personnel. All incoming data is immediately processed, transmitted and taken into account.

I hope that everything is so, that they are tracking the movement of Banderlog on the border with Novorossia, which will not work as with Nagorno-Karabakh, when the Turks, together with the Azerbaijani military, within 2 months before the start of hostilities, revealed the location of the air defense missile system and military equipment, their gps- coordinates.

[Azimuth]

Quote: svp67

Quote: tralflot1832

The target marker should indicate which captain is shooting.

This is called "network-centric warfare". And it is not the scout's business to indicate who will shoot where and when, it should be decided by Nacart on the launcher.

All that you are discussing is already yesterday, and not even today.
https://vniisignal.ru/ru/activity/special/complexes
We have had fire control systems for a long time, since Soviet times, now the main task is to "digitize" most of the weapons and systems.

For the most part, the article deals not with fire control systems, but with reconnaissance means, and, first of all, the problem of saturating troops with this technology. These are UAVs, radars (Zoo-2), and command observation vehicles, BRMs with more advanced functions in the direction of art, as they are called "machines of advanced artillery observers" over the hill.

[svoit]

Quote: Azimuth

the problem of saturating the troops with this technique. This is a UAV and a radar station (Zoo-2)

Will we buy from Ukraine? or zoo-2 and we have?

[SARANCHA1976]

I'm amazed at our defeats