Military Review

The Ministry of Defense showed a video of the combat launch of the Iskander-M OTRK missile

98
The Ministry of Defense showed a video of the combat launch of the Iskander-M OTRK missile

A video of the combat launch of an Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system (OTRK) at the Donguz training ground in the Orenburg region has appeared on the Web. The video was posted on its official YouTube channel by the Russian Ministry of Defense.


As stated in the description of the video, the combat training launch of the Iskander-M OTRK missile completed a major exercise of the 2nd Combined Arms Army of the Central Military District at the Donguz training ground in the Orenburg region.

The press service of the Central Military District reported that during the exercise, the OTRK crews fulfilled the standard for transferring the complex to a combat position and overloading missiles, and also carried out a combat launch of a missile at a target imitating a critically important object of a simulated enemy. The target was reportedly destroyed.


In addition to the Iskander-M OTRK, during the exercise, three batteries of Msta-S heavy self-propelled artillery howitzers conducted live firing, hitting targets at a distance of 10 and 12 kilometers. After completing the firing, the self-propelled guns immediately left their positions and made a march to another area.

Also, live firing conducted the calculations of the MLRS "Uragan", stopping the advance of the conditional enemy, destroying his artillery, armored vehicles and a field airfield with their volleys.

In total, about 3 thousand servicemen and about 600 units of military equipment and weapons took part in the exercises.




98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tugarin
    Tugarin 30 October 2020 15: 22 New
    27
    A serious argument.
    I am glad that my native army is kept in good shape. Keep it up!
    1. Terrible_L.
      Terrible_L. 30 October 2020 15: 28 New
      +6
      Perhaps no one doubts the effectiveness of Iskander
      1. Alexander Galaktionov
        Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 15: 34 New
        -21 qualifying.
        Efficiency)) what is the video of the defeat at what was shot?
        1. neri73-r
          neri73-r 30 October 2020 15: 44 New
          +2
          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
          Efficiency)) what is the video of the defeat at what was shot?

          Do you think the military is hiding something? laughing Low efficiency, KVO 1 km?
          1. Alexander Galaktionov
            Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 15: 46 New
            -6
            I do not see the complete video of the defeat of how the Jews tested Laura
            1. kot423
              kot423 30 October 2020 15: 52 New
              17
              Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
              I do not see the complete video of the defeat of how the Jews tested Laura

              What is the problem? A lawsuit against Shoigu that Alexander Galaktionov was not personally invited to the live firing and, moreover, they did not deign to plant Iskander next to the target so that the above-mentioned person could see the result with his own eyes.
              1. Alexander Galaktionov
                Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 15: 55 New
                -26 qualifying.
                lol It's like the C 400, which has no analogues in the world, of more than one shootdown in Syria.
                1. kot423
                  kot423 30 October 2020 15: 56 New
                  11
                  What is the parallel between my post above and your translation of arrows to C 400? After all, you answered my post?
                  1. Alexander Galaktionov
                    Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 00 New
                    -20 qualifying.
                    And the fact that there is a launch and there is no defeat of the target, what kind of KVO at what angle, if like Laura, then it will be excellent
                    1. Boris Chernikov
                      Boris Chernikov 30 October 2020 17: 50 New
                      -3
                      arrives at an angle of almost 90 degrees
                    2. Warrior-80
                      Warrior-80 31 October 2020 00: 11 New
                      +4
                      The United States recently launched the Ibr, where a video of a target was hit, maybe they launched their minuteman 3 into space, although ours laid it out for access, the fall of 3 divided parts of a poplar at the test site was video
                2. neri73-r
                  neri73-r 30 October 2020 16: 25 New
                  13
                  Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                  lol It's like the C 400, which has no analogues in the world, of more than one shootdown in Syria.

                  I'm embarrassed to ask, who was she supposed to shoot down there? lol F-15 or F-22?
                  1. Alexander Galaktionov
                    Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 28 New
                    -17 qualifying.
                    Well, Kago, on the dynamic display Army 2020, were supposed to hit tanks from guided missiles)) for non-subjective targets, you know the result)) how many flushes were
                    1. neri73-r
                      neri73-r 30 October 2020 16: 29 New
                      +8
                      You did not answer!
                      1. Alexander Galaktionov
                        Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 31 New
                        -17 qualifying.
                        Should have hit the target And so if the training launch into the void, then why put the sensation of the century here)))
                      2. neri73-r
                        neri73-r 30 October 2020 16: 34 New
                        +9
                        With 400 more shootings in Syria
                        - did you write this? Yes!
                        I ask again who she was shooting at, who was she supposed to shoot at and who was she supposed to shoot down?
                      3. Alexander Galaktionov
                        Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 35 New
                        -17 qualifying.
                        For the same tamogav and other purposes
                      4. neri73-r
                        neri73-r 30 October 2020 16: 36 New
                        10
                        Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                        For the same tamogav and other purposes

                        Did the same Tomahawks and other targets fire at our servicemen? Or our infrastructure facilities?
                      5. Alexander Galaktionov
                        Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 40 New
                        -18 qualifying.
                        Here is a tomogavk flies and personally I am giving you not for arrows but for the Syrians
                      6. neri73-r
                        neri73-r 30 October 2020 16: 48 New
                        +9
                        Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                        Here is a tomogavk flies and personally I am giving you not for arrows but for the Syrians

                        Funny, childish. I agree with you, now we will shoot down everyone who flies near our borders, they don’t tell us that they are not to us. hi good
                      7. Alexander Galaktionov
                        Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 50 New
                        -17 qualifying.
                        Oh yes, they transmit it, and then our planes are raised only the fuel is consumed by villains))))
                      8. The comment was deleted.
                      9. CSKA
                        CSKA 31 October 2020 10: 54 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                        Oh yes, they transmit it, and then our planes are raised only the fuel is consumed by villains))))

                        Now, from these comments, it became clear that it makes no sense even to ask questions of the schoolboy. It's hard to answer nonsense.
                    2. Paranoid50
                      Paranoid50 30 October 2020 19: 39 New
                      +6
                      Quote: neri73-r
                      Funny, childish.

                      That is, that is - it looks like you ran into a high school student. Moreover, illiterate and drunk. yes wassat
                    3. CSKA
                      CSKA 31 October 2020 10: 54 New
                      0
                      Quote: Paranoid50
                      That is, that is - it looks like you ran into a high school student. Moreover, illiterate and drunk.

                      laughing good Very similar to that.
        2. Bad_gr
          Bad_gr 30 October 2020 22: 23 New
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
          Should have hit the target

          Once I watched a video where an American anti-tank missile flies over a tank turret and the tank is blown to shreds by an explosion. This I mean, if you wanted to show how the rocket covers the target, even if it exploded half a minute after the start, then you would have been shown how it flies up and exactly hits the cross drawn on the target.
  • KCA
    KCA 30 October 2020 16: 40 New
    +9
    Someone's planes attacked Russian bases in Syria and the S-400 failed?
    1. Alexander Galaktionov
      Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 48 New
      -16 qualifying.
      With 400 in general, it did not show itself in Syria even if they did not shoot at ours, but the range was enough to shoot down the tomahawk and check the real performance characteristics in terms of range and height to defeat the tomahawk, it was possible to shoot
      1. KCA
        KCA 30 October 2020 16: 56 New
        10
        The Russian Federation came to Syria to help Assad in the fight against terrorists, and not to fight the United States, France, Great Britain and Israel. You are so smart, why don't you go in formation? Do you think that targets are created from a bulldozer, and not trying to bring their characteristics as close as possible to real air targets? In China, India and Turkey, there are only dummies in the ministries of defense and they can snatch dummies for billions of dollars?
        1. Alexander Galaktionov
          Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 59 New
          -14 qualifying.
          Tell me C 400 with what probability does the Boar destroy targets?
        2. KCA
          KCA 30 October 2020 17: 14 New
          +8
          I don’t know how many missiles were needed for each target, they didn’t report to me, but at all the exercises all the Boars were hit, there were from 2 to 8 targets, in any case, even if the probability of hitting is fantastic, 1, in combat conditions, a volley will be from 2 missiles. Yes, Kabanchikov and S-300 are successfully sent for meat, the video is full, take a look
  • ZEMCH
    ZEMCH 31 October 2020 03: 59 New
    +3
    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
    It's like the C 400, which has no analogues in the world, of more than one shootdown in Syria.

    And who should the S-400 shoot down in Syria? Are we being threatened by the goals for which the complex is working?
  • CSKA
    CSKA 31 October 2020 10: 52 New
    0
    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
    It's like the C 400, which has no analogues in the world, of more than one shootdown in Syria.

    And who was our S-400 in the SAR supposed to shoot down? And so in general, of course, it's full of rubbish. Here are experts in China, India, Algeria and Turkey, full of sheep that they wanted and bought the S-400. Where are they all up to mega specialist Alexander Galaktionov. He knows better. lol
  • Alexander Galaktionov
    Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 15: 58 New
    -25 qualifying.
    Shoigu would actually send Buk M3 and Tor M2 to Amrenia for testing on Laura by Extre than shooting at Karabakh at an UAV to see Tor M2 how it will show itself
    1. kot423
      kot423 30 October 2020 16: 03 New
      14
      Judging by your answers, which are understandable only to you - despite simple questions, it seems that you are under illegal substances ...
      Tie it, it is unhealthy.
      1. Alexander Galaktionov
        Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 05 New
        -20 qualifying.
        Judging by what substances you are lol I said that only show start and all this is for children
        1. kot423
          kot423 30 October 2020 16: 10 New
          11
          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
          Judging by what substances you yourself lol I said that show only start and all this is for children

          That is why I wrote to you my 1st post. So be it, I'll put it on the shelves: In order not to be indignant "yes lan, where she flew was not shown, it means - bullshit", it is enough to type in any search engine "Iskander's hit on the target, video" = profit. This is exactly what all "non-children" do. to demand "cinema on demand" from M.O. - it is either to be a child, or on drugs. If you were jarred that I initially did not consider you a child - my condolences.
          1. Alexander Galaktionov
            Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 14 New
            -16 qualifying.
            Listen, it's a shame, show only the start))) and the student will come out from afar, launch the fireworks and say I launched the neg and she hit the target in the USA))))
          2. kot423
            kot423 30 October 2020 16: 18 New
            +9
            Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
            Listen it's a shame to show only start)))

            Who are YOU so that M.O. reported? Are you a developer of a guidance system, a missile and know what kind of "stuffing" (warhead or just a blank) was in the missile? And why give "extra" information to "partners" in the form of a video on the Internet, for show-off and for your beloved?
          3. Alexander Galaktionov
            Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 24 New
            -19 qualifying.
            The Ministry of Defense should show the taxpayer, and not how on TV we have already defeated terrorists three times in Syria, but damn it may not be those or what terrorists a mustachioed cockroach sent to Azerbaijan))
          4. kot423
            kot423 30 October 2020 16: 30 New
            +8
            Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
            To the taxpayer, the MO must show

            Therefore, once again: a lawsuit against Shoigu, that he is to you, as the main taxpayer and maintainer M.O. Iskander did not report on the missile hit, but only the launch, as he showed the "child". And oblige him, such a bad thing from now on, personally to your address (if it is impossible to publish it in the public domain due to secrecy) to send ALL video-photo materials, otherwise YOU, as a taxpayer, will be offended and will no longer be M.O. contain.
            PS I personally authorize you to use this text when drawing up a statement of claim.
          5. Alexander Galaktionov
            Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 37 New
            -16 qualifying.
            Why does Shoigu then hangs about the state defense order that they delivered how much?
          6. kot423
            kot423 30 October 2020 16: 40 New
            +8
            Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
            Why does Shoigu then hangs about the state defense order that they delivered how much?

            Exactly. And be sure to indicate this in the claim.
          7. Alexander Galaktionov
            Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 41 New
            -16 qualifying.
            Are there many of you here with Olgino?)))
          8. kot423
            kot423 30 October 2020 16: 44 New
            10
            Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
            Are there many of you here with Olgino?)))

            Your question has nothing to do with our discussion with you. The drugs are at their peak of action, since you again start the arrows from the topic of the conversation to translate? Or, sorry, if you are a child, then a fragile child's brain cannot keep the topic of our discussion in priority?
  • ZEMCH
    ZEMCH 31 October 2020 04: 10 New
    +1
    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
    The Ministry of Defense should show the taxpayer, and not how on TV we have already defeated terrorists three times in Syria, but damn it may not be those or what terrorists a mustachioed cockroach sent to Azerbaijan))

    You are not a MO taxpayer because Personal income tax is only 26% of the country's budget, and the budget of the Ministry of Defense is formed from other items of income of the RF budget))
  • Alexander Galaktionov
    Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 17: 01 New
    -11 qualifying.
    The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reports on your only the head of the Pentagon and the Galactic genius)
  • kot423
    kot423 30 October 2020 17: 02 New
    +6
    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
    The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reports on your only the head of the Pentagon and the Galactic genius)

    Is it you who voiced your main dream now?
  • KCA
    KCA 30 October 2020 16: 42 New
    +5
    Tor-M2 and Pantsir have been experienced enough in Syria, statistics are publicly available
  • CSKA
    CSKA 31 October 2020 10: 57 New
    -1
    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
    Shoigu would actually send Buk M3 and Tor M2 to Amrenia for testing on Laura by Extre than shooting at Karabakh at an UAV to see Tor M2 how it will show itself

    Why should we suddenly send something to Armenia just like that. In this conflict, we do not take one of the sides. And from your comments it is clear that your level of understanding in geopolitics is at the level of a kindergarten.
  • Lexus
    Lexus 30 October 2020 16: 38 New
    10
    There is a video from previous shootings. Certainly not in the "window", as the liars hum, but within the deviations declared by the manufacturer. What, given the level development degradation of domestic electronics, already a feat. My opinion. The rest of the systems, alas, cannot even boast of such a thing. Therefore, there is no other evidence of hitting the "peg", no matter how pathetic it is trumpeted. In the era of PR, it is not otherwise.

    1. Alexander Galaktionov
      Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 52 New
      -3
      If the deviation and angle of defeat are like Laura's, then Iskander did quite well for himself
      1. Lexus
        Lexus 30 October 2020 17: 00 New
        12
        hi I have not heard any complaints about Iskander from specialists. Good system. Already would "pour out their soul." By the way, "Laura" in Karabakh demonstrated somewhere the same KVO.

        1. Alexander Galaktionov
          Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 17: 03 New
          -5
          Yesterday the video was there, someone says something, then Laura, then Eksta on the video of the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense, where the rocket itself was cassettes, but I wonder if Laura or Eksta was what ?
          1. Lexus
            Lexus 30 October 2020 17: 09 New
            12
            Have not seen. Post a video - we'll discuss.
            1. Alexander Galaktionov
              Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 17: 19 New
              -4
              I can't insert video from my phone ((
            2. Alexander Galaktionov
              Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 17: 22 New
              -5
              I saw a military informant VK they have a video there signed as Extra, there is such another question, Extras have nasal stabilizers and similar ones put on new missiles to the Tornado
  • ZEMCH
    ZEMCH 31 October 2020 04: 05 New
    +2
    There is a film "Pentagon Wars")) there is a moment when a missile hits a target, it falls from a crane arrow directly over the target))
    The achievement of the goal of the exercises is determined by the mediators from the Ministry of Defense, if they believe that the goals have been achieved, then it is so))) Because no one wants to lose their positions, and all documents on the exercises are accompanied by records from the means of objective control wink
  • kit88
    kit88 30 October 2020 15: 47 New
    13

    So ok?
  • URAL72
    URAL72 30 October 2020 16: 34 New
    +6
    There is probably no video, but there are witnesses how Tochka U shot. Chechen fighters. I think there are still survivors - a couple of PIECES ... It’s a pity for you, the all-consuming, admirer of the Holy West, then was not on that square in Grozny.
    1. Alexander Galaktionov
      Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 56 New
      -6
      There is a video of Dots U how Ukrainians shot milk
      1. URAL72
        URAL72 30 October 2020 17: 01 New
        +5
        That is why they were replaced in Russia by Iskander because all the service life has long expired, especially for missiles. Again, who and WHERE taught the Ukrainian calculations after the collapse of the military education system in Ukraine and the severance of relations with Russia?
  • Boris Chernikov
    Boris Chernikov 30 October 2020 17: 49 New
    +1
    there was a video at one time as a blank falls into a circle at the polygon .. everyone was unhappy .. like Che did not bang ... there will always be dissatisfied
  • antivirus
    antivirus 30 October 2020 15: 42 New
    -2
    again without aircraft carriers

    how did he get all the patriots Shoigu with his missiles and aviation
  • Maki maki
    Maki maki 1 November 2020 00: 25 New
    16
    "It's hard at school, easy at work" ©
  • yfast
    yfast 30 October 2020 15: 29 New
    -18 qualifying.
    Bayraktar will bury him in this hole. No, I don't want that. And it's a shame that the living experienced people. Go find the pilot of the bayraktar.
    1. d4rkmesa
      d4rkmesa 30 October 2020 15: 40 New
      +7
      Well, then "Iskander" can also get the operators of Bayraktar, the point is only in the political will and intelligence work.
    2. kit88
      kit88 30 October 2020 15: 42 New
      16
      Yes you. Bayraktar has not yet taken off, and Iskander has gone so beautifully.
      Where do you think?
      To bury the operators of the buyers.
    3. Oleg1263
      Oleg1263 30 October 2020 15: 53 New
      +8
      The radius of destruction of "Iskander M" is three times greater than the radius of application of "Bayraktar" .....
    4. Bully
      Bully 30 October 2020 15: 54 New
      +3
      And go find the pilot of the bayraktar

      With agents, it’s not so difficult to find. They put a feather in the side of such a botanist in a dark alley and there is no pilot of the bayraktar. Quiet and efficient
    5. Servisinzhener
      Servisinzhener 30 October 2020 16: 02 New
      +2
      Only in the absence of air defense as a multilevel system.
    6. dzvero
      dzvero 30 October 2020 16: 30 New
      +6
      Iskander does not walk along the front line, so a rare bayraktar will fly to his position. And if it did fly, then the situation has long since turned into a situevina ...
  • Radikal
    Radikal 30 October 2020 15: 32 New
    -4
    The Ministry of Defense showed a video of the combat launch of the Iskander-M OTRK missile
    What is the exclusivity or extraordinaryness of the event? winked lol
    1. antivirus
      antivirus 30 October 2020 15: 44 New
      +2
      diesel fuel and their ankle boots - imported

      no nonsense - life goes on and we (RF) are still floundering. trying to keep up with partners
    2. Alesi13
      Alesi13 30 October 2020 15: 46 New
      -2
      And someone promised both?
    3. Lexus
      Lexus 30 October 2020 17: 16 New
      11
      Colleague hi,
      not everyone is used to getting into the essence. For some, it is enough to swim on the surface.
  • Alien From
    Alien From 30 October 2020 15: 57 New
    0
    Iskander is power, great power! The teachings are pleasing with him!
    1. novel66
      novel66 30 October 2020 16: 01 New
      0
      On the shores of Izhora and Tosna
      Our guards are victorious [

      K. Prutkov
  • Alexander Galaktionov
    Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 16: 03 New
    -10 qualifying.
    Iskander K will be shown what how does it shoot or also just start and hitting the target and what deviation
  • certero
    certero 30 October 2020 16: 04 New
    +4
    The question is - why the heck write a false headline?
    A combat launch is a blow to an enemy. And combat training is training.
  • Old26
    Old26 30 October 2020 16: 37 New
    +4
    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
    Iskander K will be shown

    And such a complex exists only in the heads of journalists. There is no Iskander-K complex. There is only Iskander and Iskander-M
    1. Lexus
      Lexus 30 October 2020 17: 23 New
      12
      Vladimir hi,
      some can only master the pros and cons. They consume what they give.
    2. Alexander Galaktionov
      Alexander Galaktionov 30 October 2020 17: 24 New
      -2
      Iskander K like there are missiles with reduced caliber, 4 missiles per installation
  • Linxs
    Linxs 30 October 2020 17: 09 New
    0
    Better Trump's Twitter and more intelligible)))
    1. Asad
      Asad 30 October 2020 17: 31 New
      0
      Well, some of Trump's tweets create such a rustle in the world!
  • Old26
    Old26 30 October 2020 17: 32 New
    +1
    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
    Iskander K like there are missiles with reduced caliber, 4 missiles per installation

    4 each on the installation - this is for the 9M729 missiles, because of which the Americans withdrew from the INF Treaty. But so far, apart from the show at MAKS in 2007-2008 and at the show in Moscow at the MO briefing - this installation has not been shown anywhere else.
    Iskander-K is an invention of journalists, after we tested the R-9 (78M1) cruise missile from the 500P9-728 launcher. The complex was named "Iskander-M" and its 9P78-1 launcher could launch both ballistic and cruise missiles, in contrast to the 9P78 launcher, from which only ballistic missiles could be launched.
  • Lesorub
    Lesorub 30 October 2020 17: 48 New
    +3
    The Ministry of Defense showed a video of the combat launch of the Iskander-M OTRK missile

    It would be interesting to see our drills using drone UAVs - the world's trend towards the use of unmanned vehicles.
  • Jacket in stock
    Jacket in stock 30 October 2020 19: 08 New
    0
    ... The video was posted on its official YouTube channel by the Russian Ministry of Defense.

    Tomorrow they will ban him on YouTube, and we will not see anything else.
    It would be better to show our information delivery channels.
    1. Voyager
      Voyager 30 October 2020 19: 32 New
      0
      Yes, there have already been attempts to create such channels, no one needs them for nothing.
  • Old26
    Old26 30 October 2020 19: 30 New
    +3
    Quote: Lesorub
    It would be interesting to see our drills using drone UAVs - the world's trend towards the use of unmanned vehicles.

    Someday we'll see. Now we do not yet have shock UAVs in such quantities that it is necessary to conduct exercises with them
  • lvov_aleksey
    lvov_aleksey 30 October 2020 20: 28 New
    0
    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
    Efficiency)) what is the video of the defeat at what was shot?

    do you want to edit the video? all the same you say - editing! or have you forgotten that the rocket flies 100 km?))))
  • lvov_aleksey
    lvov_aleksey 30 October 2020 20: 30 New
    -1
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: Lesorub
    It would be interesting to see our drills using drone UAVs - the world's trend towards the use of unmanned vehicles.

    Someday we'll see. Now we do not yet have shock UAVs in such quantities that it is necessary to conduct exercises with them

    we don't need this, or do you want to catch Napoleon and Hitler?)))
    ps I will explain - what is an attack UAV for?))))
  • iouris
    iouris 30 October 2020 20: 31 New
    -3
    Combat launch? Which country was slammed?
  • IS-1
    IS-1 30 October 2020 21: 06 New
    -5
    Why "Iskander" .. There are already "Vanguards" on duty and "Sarmatians" with "Poseidons" .. and so on.
    This is what it means in Russia, "Until the thunder breaks out, the man does not cross himself." good
    And most importantly, food security has been dramatically increased ..))) In the production of wheat, again in the first place .. Yeah bully
    Thanks to the sanctions and Obamych hi
  • Old26
    Old26 31 October 2020 01: 29 New
    +5
    Quote: IS-1
    There are already "Vanguards" on duty and "Sarmatians" with "Poseidons" ... and so on.

    "Vanguards" are standing. In the amount of 4 pieces. "Poseidon" has not yet been tested, and "Sarmat" has not yet had any tests other than throwing ones. so if "Sarmat" is on duty in 2-3 years, it's good
    1. Lexus
      Lexus 31 October 2020 01: 49 New
      +3
      "Vanguard" - so far only new equipment on the old "Stiletto". "Poseidon" - a pipe covered with a tarpaulin in the workshop. "Sarmat" - upon close examination, outwardly does not differ at all from the "Voevoda" ("Satan"). "Petrel" so far only "amazed" Nyonoksa. I would not like the country's security to be hostage to these "breakthroughs / innovations".
      1. iouris
        iouris 31 October 2020 09: 33 New
        +1
        "Security" is when you sit quietly like a mouse under a broom.
  • Old26
    Old26 31 October 2020 02: 30 New
    +1
    Quote: Warrior-80
    The United States recently launched the Ibr, where a video of a target was hit, maybe they launched their minuteman 3 into space, although ours laid it out for access, the fall of 3 divided parts of a poplar at the test site was video

    Topol has always had a candy bar. As with Topol-M. so the record was something else


    Quote: lexus
    "Vanguard" - so far only new equipment on the old "Stiletto". "Poseidon" - a pipe covered with a tarpaulin in the workshop. "Sarmat" - upon close examination, outwardly does not differ at all from the "Voevoda" ("Satan"). "Petrel" so far only "amazed" Nyonoksa. I would not like the country's security to be hostage to these "breakthroughs / innovations".

    I agree with the "Vanguard", "Poseidon" and "Petrel. Outwardly", in principle, "Sarmat" should not differ much from the "Voevoda", although there are still some differences in the head fairing
  • TatarinSSSR
    TatarinSSSR 31 October 2020 14: 08 New
    0
    Interestingly, and from UAVs such as Turkish protection what is being worked out?