The Ministry of Defense showed a video of the combat launch of the Iskander-M OTRK missile

98
The Ministry of Defense showed a video of the combat launch of the Iskander-M OTRK missile

A video of the combat launch of an Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system (OTRK) at the Donguz training ground in the Orenburg region has appeared on the Web. The video was posted on its official YouTube channel by the Russian Ministry of Defense.

As stated in the description of the video, the combat training launch of the Iskander-M OTRK missile completed a major exercise of the 2nd Combined Arms Army of the Central Military District at the Donguz training ground in the Orenburg region.



The press service of the Central Military District reported that during the exercise, the OTRK crews fulfilled the standard for transferring the complex to a combat position and overloading missiles, and also carried out a combat launch of a missile at a target imitating a critically important object of a simulated enemy. The target was reportedly destroyed.


In addition to the Iskander-M OTRK, during the exercise, three batteries of Msta-S heavy self-propelled artillery howitzers conducted live firing, hitting targets at a distance of 10 and 12 kilometers. After completing the firing, the self-propelled guns immediately left their positions and made a march to another area.

Also, live firing conducted the calculations of the MLRS "Uragan", stopping the advance of the conditional enemy, destroying his artillery, armored vehicles and a field airfield with their volleys.

In total, about 3 thousand servicemen and about 600 units of military equipment and weapons took part in the exercises.


    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    98 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +27
      30 October 2020 15: 22
      A serious argument.
      I am glad that my native army is kept in good shape. Keep it up!
      1. +6
        30 October 2020 15: 28
        Perhaps no one doubts the effectiveness of Iskander
        1. -21
          30 October 2020 15: 34
          Efficiency)) what is the video of the defeat at what was shot?
          1. +2
            30 October 2020 15: 44
            Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
            Efficiency)) what is the video of the defeat at what was shot?

            Do you think the military is hiding something? laughing Low efficiency, KVO 1 km?
            1. -6
              30 October 2020 15: 46
              I do not see the complete video of the defeat of how the Jews tested Laura
              1. +17
                30 October 2020 15: 52
                Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                I do not see the complete video of the defeat of how the Jews tested Laura

                What is the problem? A lawsuit against Shoigu that Alexander Galaktionov was not personally invited to the live firing and, moreover, they did not deign to plant Iskander next to the target so that the above-mentioned person could see the result with his own eyes.
                1. -26
                  30 October 2020 15: 55
                  lol It's like the C 400, which has no analogues in the world, of more than one shootdown in Syria.
                  1. +11
                    30 October 2020 15: 56
                    What is the parallel between my post above and your translation of arrows to C 400? After all, you answered my post?
                    1. -20
                      30 October 2020 16: 00
                      And the fact that there is a launch and there is no defeat of the target, what kind of KVO at what angle, if like Laura, then it will be excellent
                      1. -3
                        30 October 2020 17: 50
                        arrives at an angle of almost 90 degrees
                      2. +4
                        31 October 2020 00: 11
                        The United States recently launched the Ibr, where a video of a target was hit, maybe they launched their minuteman 3 into space, although ours laid it out for access, the fall of 3 divided parts of a poplar at the test site was video
                  2. +13
                    30 October 2020 16: 25
                    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                    lol It's like the C 400, which has no analogues in the world, of more than one shootdown in Syria.

                    I'm embarrassed to ask, who was she supposed to shoot down there? lol F-15 or F-22?
                    1. -17
                      30 October 2020 16: 28
                      Well, Kago, on the dynamic display Army 2020, were supposed to hit tanks from guided missiles)) for non-subjective targets, you know the result)) how many flushes were
                      1. +8
                        30 October 2020 16: 29
                        You did not answer!
                        1. -17
                          30 October 2020 16: 31
                          Should have hit the target And so if the training launch into the void, then why put the sensation of the century here)))
                        2. +9
                          30 October 2020 16: 34
                          With 400 more shootings in Syria
                          - did you write this? Yes!
                          I ask again who she was shooting at, who was she supposed to shoot at and who was she supposed to shoot down?
                        3. -17
                          30 October 2020 16: 35
                          For the same tamogav and other purposes
                        4. +10
                          30 October 2020 16: 36
                          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                          For the same tamogav and other purposes

                          Did the same Tomahawks and other targets fire at our servicemen? Or our infrastructure facilities?
                        5. -18
                          30 October 2020 16: 40
                          Here is a tomogavk flies and personally I am giving you not for arrows but for the Syrians
                        6. +9
                          30 October 2020 16: 48
                          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                          Here is a tomogavk flies and personally I am giving you not for arrows but for the Syrians

                          Funny, childish. I agree with you, now we will shoot down everyone who flies near our borders, they don’t tell us that they are not to us. hi good
                        7. -17
                          30 October 2020 16: 50
                          Oh yes, they transmit it, and then our planes are raised only the fuel is consumed by villains))))
                        8. The comment was deleted.
                        9. +1
                          31 October 2020 10: 54
                          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                          Oh yes, they transmit it, and then our planes are raised only the fuel is consumed by villains))))

                          Now, from these comments, it became clear that it makes no sense even to ask questions of the schoolboy. It's hard to answer nonsense.
                        10. +6
                          30 October 2020 19: 39
                          Quote: neri73-r
                          Funny, childish.

                          That is, that is - it looks like you ran into a high school student. Moreover, illiterate and drunk. Yes wassat
                        11. 0
                          31 October 2020 10: 54
                          Quote: Paranoid50
                          That is, that is - it looks like you ran into a high school student. Moreover, illiterate and drunk.

                          laughing good Very similar to that.
                        12. +1
                          30 October 2020 22: 23
                          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                          Should have hit the target

                          Once I watched a video where an American anti-tank missile flies over a tank turret and the tank is blown to shreds by an explosion. This I mean, if you wanted to show how the rocket covers the target, even if it exploded half a minute after the start, then you would have been shown how it flies up and exactly hits the cross drawn on the target.
                  3. KCA
                    +9
                    30 October 2020 16: 40
                    Someone's planes attacked Russian bases in Syria and the S-400 failed?
                    1. -16
                      30 October 2020 16: 48
                      With 400 in general, it did not show itself in Syria even if they did not shoot at ours, but the range was enough to shoot down the tomahawk and check the real performance characteristics in terms of range and height to defeat the tomahawk, it was possible to shoot
                      1. KCA
                        +10
                        30 October 2020 16: 56
                        The Russian Federation came to Syria to help Assad in the fight against terrorists, and not to fight the United States, France, Great Britain and Israel. You are so smart, why don't you go in formation? Do you think that targets are created from a bulldozer, and not trying to bring their characteristics as close as possible to real air targets? In China, India and Turkey, there are only dummies in the ministries of defense and they can snatch dummies for billions of dollars?
                        1. -14
                          30 October 2020 16: 59
                          Tell me C 400 with what probability does the Boar destroy targets?
                        2. KCA
                          +8
                          30 October 2020 17: 14
                          I don’t know how many missiles were needed for each target, they didn’t report to me, but at all the exercises all the Boars were hit, there were from 2 to 8 targets, in any case, even if the probability of hitting is fantastic, 1, in combat conditions, a volley will be from 2 missiles. Yes, Kabanchikov and S-300 are successfully sent for meat, the video is full, take a look
                  4. +3
                    31 October 2020 03: 59
                    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                    It's like the C 400, which has no analogues in the world, of more than one shootdown in Syria.

                    And who should the S-400 shoot down in Syria? Are we being threatened by the goals for which the complex is working?
                  5. 0
                    31 October 2020 10: 52
                    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                    It's like the C 400, which has no analogues in the world, of more than one shootdown in Syria.

                    And who was our S-400 in the SAR supposed to shoot down? And so in general, of course, it's full of rubbish. Here are experts in China, India, Algeria and Turkey, full of sheep that they wanted and bought the S-400. Where are they all up to mega specialist Alexander Galaktionov. He knows better. lol
                2. -25
                  30 October 2020 15: 58
                  Shoigu would actually send Buk M3 and Tor M2 to Amrenia for testing on Laura by Extre than shooting at Karabakh at an UAV to see Tor M2 how it will show itself
                  1. +14
                    30 October 2020 16: 03
                    Judging by your answers, which are understandable only to you - despite simple questions, it seems that you are under illegal substances ...
                    Tie it, it is unhealthy.
                    1. -20
                      30 October 2020 16: 05
                      Judging by what substances you are lol I said that only show start and all this is for children
                      1. +11
                        30 October 2020 16: 10
                        Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                        Judging by what substances you yourself lol I said that show only start and all this is for children

                        That is why I wrote to you my 1st post. So be it, I'll put it on the shelves: In order not to be indignant "yes lan, where she flew was not shown, it means - bullshit", it is enough to type in any search engine "Iskander's hit on the target, video" = profit. This is exactly what all "non-children" do. to demand "cinema on demand" from M.O. - it is either to be a child, or on drugs. If you were jarred that I initially did not consider you a child - my condolences.
                        1. -16
                          30 October 2020 16: 14
                          Listen, it's a shame, show only the start))) and the student will come out from afar, launch the fireworks and say I launched the neg and she hit the target in the USA))))
                        2. +9
                          30 October 2020 16: 18
                          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                          Listen it's a shame to show only start)))

                          Who are YOU so that M.O. reported? Are you a developer of a guidance system, a missile and know what kind of "stuffing" (warhead or just a blank) was in the missile? And why give "extra" information to "partners" in the form of a video on the Internet, for show-off and for your beloved?
                        3. -19
                          30 October 2020 16: 24
                          The Ministry of Defense should show the taxpayer, and not how on TV we have already defeated terrorists three times in Syria, but damn it may not be those or what terrorists a mustachioed cockroach sent to Azerbaijan))
                        4. +8
                          30 October 2020 16: 30
                          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                          To the taxpayer, the MO must show

                          Therefore, once again: a lawsuit against Shoigu, that he is to you, as the main taxpayer and maintainer M.O. Iskander did not report on the missile hit, but only the launch, as he showed the "child". And oblige him, such a bad thing from now on, personally to your address (if it is impossible to publish it in the public domain due to secrecy) to send ALL video-photo materials, otherwise YOU, as a taxpayer, will be offended and will no longer be M.O. contain.
                          PS I personally authorize you to use this text when drawing up a statement of claim.
                        5. -16
                          30 October 2020 16: 37
                          Why does Shoigu then hangs about the state defense order that they delivered how much?
                        6. +8
                          30 October 2020 16: 40
                          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                          Why does Shoigu then hangs about the state defense order that they delivered how much?

                          Exactly. And be sure to indicate this in the claim.
                        7. -16
                          30 October 2020 16: 41
                          Are there many of you here with Olgino?)))
                        8. +10
                          30 October 2020 16: 44
                          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                          Are there many of you here with Olgino?)))

                          Your question has nothing to do with our discussion with you. The drugs are at their peak of action, since you again start the arrows from the topic of the conversation to translate? Or, sorry, if you are a child, then a fragile child's brain cannot keep the topic of our discussion in priority?
                        9. +1
                          31 October 2020 04: 10
                          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                          The Ministry of Defense should show the taxpayer, and not how on TV we have already defeated terrorists three times in Syria, but damn it may not be those or what terrorists a mustachioed cockroach sent to Azerbaijan))

                          You are not a MO taxpayer because Personal income tax is only 26% of the country's budget, and the budget of the Ministry of Defense is formed from other items of income of the RF budget))
                        10. -11
                          30 October 2020 17: 01
                          The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reports on your only the head of the Pentagon and the Galactic genius)
                        11. +6
                          30 October 2020 17: 02
                          Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                          The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reports on your only the head of the Pentagon and the Galactic genius)

                          Is it you who voiced your main dream now?
                  2. KCA
                    +5
                    30 October 2020 16: 42
                    Tor-M2 and Pantsir have been experienced enough in Syria, statistics are publicly available
                  3. -1
                    31 October 2020 10: 57
                    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                    Shoigu would actually send Buk M3 and Tor M2 to Amrenia for testing on Laura by Extre than shooting at Karabakh at an UAV to see Tor M2 how it will show itself

                    Why should we suddenly send something to Armenia just like that. In this conflict, we do not take one of the sides. And from your comments it is clear that your level of understanding in geopolitics is at the level of a kindergarten.
              2. +10
                30 October 2020 16: 38
                There is a video from previous shootings. Certainly not in the "window", as the liars hum, but within the deviations declared by the manufacturer. What, given the level development degradation of domestic electronics, already a feat. My opinion. The rest of the systems, alas, cannot even boast of such a thing. Therefore, there is no other evidence of hitting the "peg", no matter how pathetic it is trumpeted. In the era of PR, it is not otherwise.

                1. -3
                  30 October 2020 16: 52
                  If the deviation and angle of defeat are like Laura's, then Iskander did quite well for himself
                  1. +12
                    30 October 2020 17: 00
                    hi I have not heard any complaints about Iskander from specialists. Good system. Already would "pour out their soul." By the way, "Laura" in Karabakh demonstrated somewhere the same KVO.

                    1. -5
                      30 October 2020 17: 03
                      Yesterday the video was there, someone says something, then Laura, then Eksta on the video of the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense, where the rocket itself was cassettes, but I wonder if Laura or Eksta was what ?
                      1. +12
                        30 October 2020 17: 09
                        Have not seen. Post a video - we'll discuss.
                        1. -4
                          30 October 2020 17: 19
                          I can't insert video from my phone ((
                        2. -5
                          30 October 2020 17: 22
                          I saw a military informant VK they have a video there signed as Extra, there is such another question, Extras have nasal stabilizers and similar ones put on new missiles to the Tornado
              3. +2
                31 October 2020 04: 05
                There is a film "Pentagon Wars")) there is a moment when a missile hits a target, it falls from a crane arrow directly over the target))
                The achievement of the goal of the exercises is determined by the mediators from the Ministry of Defense, if they believe that the goals have been achieved, then it is so))) Because no one wants to lose their positions, and all documents on the exercises are accompanied by records from the means of objective control wink
          2. +13
            30 October 2020 15: 47

            So ok?
          3. +6
            30 October 2020 16: 34
            There is probably no video, but there are witnesses how Tochka U shot. Chechen fighters. I think there are still survivors - a couple of PIECES ... It’s a pity for you, the all-consuming, admirer of the Holy West, then was not on that square in Grozny.
            1. -6
              30 October 2020 16: 56
              There is a video of Dots U how Ukrainians shot milk
              1. +5
                30 October 2020 17: 01
                That is why they were replaced in Russia by Iskander because all the service life has long expired, especially for missiles. Again, who and WHERE taught the Ukrainian calculations after the collapse of the military education system in Ukraine and the severance of relations with Russia?
          4. +1
            30 October 2020 17: 49
            there was a video at one time as a blank falls into a circle at the polygon .. everyone was unhappy .. like Che did not bang ... there will always be dissatisfied
        2. -2
          30 October 2020 15: 42
          again without aircraft carriers

          how did he get all the patriots Shoigu with his missiles and aviation
      2. +16
        1 November 2020 00: 25
        "It's hard at school, easy at work" ©
    2. -18
      30 October 2020 15: 29
      Bayraktar will bury him in this hole. No, I don't want that. And it's a shame that the living experienced people. Go find the pilot of the bayraktar.
      1. +7
        30 October 2020 15: 40
        Well, then "Iskander" can also get the operators of Bayraktar, the point is only in the political will and intelligence work.
      2. +16
        30 October 2020 15: 42
        Yes you. Bayraktar has not yet taken off, and Iskander has gone so beautifully.
        Where do you think?
        To bury the operators of the buyers.
      3. +8
        30 October 2020 15: 53
        The radius of destruction of "Iskander M" is three times greater than the radius of application of "Bayraktar" .....
      4. +3
        30 October 2020 15: 54
        And go find the pilot of the bayraktar

        With agents, it’s not so difficult to find. They put a feather in the side of such a botanist in a dark alley and there is no pilot of the bayraktar. Quiet and efficient
      5. +2
        30 October 2020 16: 02
        Only in the absence of air defense as a multilevel system.
      6. +6
        30 October 2020 16: 30
        Iskander does not walk along the front line, so a rare bayraktar will fly to his position. And if it did fly, then the situation has long since turned into a situevina ...
    3. -4
      30 October 2020 15: 32
      The Ministry of Defense showed a video of the combat launch of the Iskander-M OTRK missile
      What is the exclusivity or extraordinaryness of the event? winked lol
      1. +2
        30 October 2020 15: 44
        diesel fuel and their ankle boots - imported

        no nonsense - life goes on and we (RF) are still floundering. trying to keep up with partners
      2. -2
        30 October 2020 15: 46
        And someone promised both?
      3. +11
        30 October 2020 17: 16
        Colleague hi,
        not everyone is used to getting into the essence. For some, it is enough to swim on the surface.
    4. 0
      30 October 2020 15: 57
      Iskander is power, great power! The teachings are pleasing with him!
      1. 0
        30 October 2020 16: 01
        On the shores of Izhora and Tosna
        Our guards are victorious [

        K. Prutkov
    5. -10
      30 October 2020 16: 03
      Iskander K will be shown what how does it shoot or also just start and hitting the target and what deviation
    6. +4
      30 October 2020 16: 04
      The question is - why the heck write a false headline?
      A combat launch is a blow to an enemy. And combat training is training.
    7. +4
      30 October 2020 16: 37
      Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
      Iskander K will be shown

      And such a complex exists only in the heads of journalists. There is no Iskander-K complex. There is only Iskander and Iskander-M
      1. +12
        30 October 2020 17: 23
        Vladimir hi,
        some can only master the pros and cons. They consume what they give.
      2. -2
        30 October 2020 17: 24
        Iskander K like there are missiles with reduced caliber, 4 missiles per installation
    8. 0
      30 October 2020 17: 09
      Better Trump's Twitter and more intelligible)))
      1. 0
        30 October 2020 17: 31
        Well, some of Trump's tweets create such a rustle in the world!
    9. +1
      30 October 2020 17: 32
      Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
      Iskander K like there are missiles with reduced caliber, 4 missiles per installation

      4 each on the installation - this is for the 9M729 missiles, because of which the Americans withdrew from the INF Treaty. But so far, apart from the show at MAKS in 2007-2008 and at the show in Moscow at the MO briefing - this installation has not been shown anywhere else.
      Iskander-K is an invention of journalists, after we tested the R-9 (78M1) cruise missile from the 500P9-728 launcher. The complex was named "Iskander-M" and its 9P78-1 launcher could launch both ballistic and cruise missiles, in contrast to the 9P78 launcher, from which only ballistic missiles could be launched.
    10. +3
      30 October 2020 17: 48
      The Ministry of Defense showed a video of the combat launch of the Iskander-M OTRK missile

      It would be interesting to see our drills using drone UAVs - the world's trend towards the use of unmanned vehicles.
    11. 0
      30 October 2020 19: 08
      ... The video was posted on its official YouTube channel by the Russian Ministry of Defense.

      Tomorrow they will ban him on YouTube, and we will not see anything else.
      It would be better to show our information delivery channels.
      1. 0
        30 October 2020 19: 32
        Yes, there have already been attempts to create such channels, no one needs them for nothing.
    12. +3
      30 October 2020 19: 30
      Quote: Lesorub
      It would be interesting to see our drills using drone UAVs - the world's trend towards the use of unmanned vehicles.

      Someday we'll see. Now we do not yet have shock UAVs in such quantities that it is necessary to conduct exercises with them
    13. 0
      30 October 2020 20: 28
      Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
      Efficiency)) what is the video of the defeat at what was shot?

      do you want to edit the video? all the same you say - editing! or have you forgotten that the rocket flies 100 km?))))
    14. -1
      30 October 2020 20: 30
      Quote: Old26
      Quote: Lesorub
      It would be interesting to see our drills using drone UAVs - the world's trend towards the use of unmanned vehicles.

      Someday we'll see. Now we do not yet have shock UAVs in such quantities that it is necessary to conduct exercises with them

      we don't need this, or do you want to catch Napoleon and Hitler?)))
      ps I will explain - what is an attack UAV for?))))
    15. -3
      30 October 2020 20: 31
      Combat launch? Which country was slammed?
    16. -5
      30 October 2020 21: 06
      Why "Iskander" .. There are already "Vanguards" on duty and "Sarmatians" with "Poseidons" .. and so on.
      This is what it means in Russia, "Until the thunder breaks out, the man does not cross himself." good
      And most importantly, food security has been dramatically increased ..))) In the production of wheat, again in the first place .. Yeah bully
      Thanks to the sanctions and Obamych hi
    17. +5
      31 October 2020 01: 29
      Quote: IS-1
      There are already "Vanguards" on duty and "Sarmatians" with "Poseidons" ... and so on.

      "Vanguards" are standing. In the amount of 4 pieces. "Poseidon" has not yet been tested, and "Sarmat" has not yet had any tests other than throwing ones. so if "Sarmat" is on duty in 2-3 years, it's good
      1. +3
        31 October 2020 01: 49
        "Vanguard" - so far only new equipment on the old "Stiletto". "Poseidon" - a pipe covered with a tarpaulin in the workshop. "Sarmat" - upon close examination, outwardly does not differ at all from the "Voevoda" ("Satan"). "Petrel" so far only "amazed" Nyonoksa. I would not like the country's security to be hostage to these "breakthroughs / innovations".
        1. +1
          31 October 2020 09: 33
          "Security" is when you sit quietly like a mouse under a broom.
    18. +1
      31 October 2020 02: 30
      Quote: Warrior-80
      The United States recently launched the Ibr, where a video of a target was hit, maybe they launched their minuteman 3 into space, although ours laid it out for access, the fall of 3 divided parts of a poplar at the test site was video

      Topol has always had a candy bar. As with Topol-M. so the record was something else


      Quote: lexus
      "Vanguard" - so far only new equipment on the old "Stiletto". "Poseidon" - a pipe covered with a tarpaulin in the workshop. "Sarmat" - upon close examination, outwardly does not differ at all from the "Voevoda" ("Satan"). "Petrel" so far only "amazed" Nyonoksa. I would not like the country's security to be hostage to these "breakthroughs / innovations".

      I agree with the "Vanguard", "Poseidon" and "Petrel. Outwardly", in principle, "Sarmat" should not differ much from the "Voevoda", although there are still some differences in the head fairing
    19. 0
      31 October 2020 14: 08
      Interestingly, and from UAVs such as Turkish protection what is being worked out?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"