Admiral's series frigates will receive high-precision anti-submarine weapons

October 30 2020 60

Russian frigates of project 22350 will receive anti-submarine guided missiles (PLUR). The corresponding decision was made by the Ministry of Defense.

This is reported "News" with reference to the military department.

Naval Command fleet Russia has decided on the ships, which in the future will receive new missile-torpedoes for the fight against enemy submarines. According to available data, the first anti-submarine guided missiles (PLUR) will receive frigates of the "Admiral's series" of project 22350. It is possible that the rearmament of frigates will take place as early as next year, 2021.

In 2019, the Ministry of Defense announced that the development of a new anti-submarine guided missile was in a high degree of readiness. Later, Deputy Defense Minister Krivoruchko said that the new complex was put into pilot production, and the ongoing tests are planned to be completed in 2020.

On October 28 this year, the press service of the Northern Fleet announced that the first serial frigate of Project 22350 Admiral Kasatonov was testing a new anti-submarine missile. The tests were reportedly carried out at one of the Northern Fleet's sea ranges in the Barents Sea. The shooting was carried out as part of the qualification serial tests of the product and was recognized as successful.

The ships of project 22350 have a displacement of 5 thousand tons with a length of 135 m and a width of 16 m. The frigate is capable of covering 4500 miles, while developing a speed of up to 29 knots. The sailing endurance is 30 days. Crew - from 170 people.

The frigate is armed with: the 130-mm A-192 artillery mount, the Poliment-Redut anti-aircraft missile system; launchers for 16 anti-ship missiles "Onyx" or "Caliber", anti-submarine complex "Package", anti-submarine helicopter Ka-27.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Mavrikiy

+1

30 October 2020 08: 31

16 anti-ship missiles "Onyx" or "Caliber", anti-submarine complex "Package"
Unclear. Some of the Calibers will be replaced with PLUR, what is most likely, or will the "Package" be removed?
1. kubanec
  
  +6
  
  30 October 2020 08: 49
  
  I think they will complete the cells depending on the task, because they are universal ...
2. hrych
  
  +14
  
  30 October 2020 09: 13
  
  Quote: Mavrikiy
  Some of the Calibers will be replaced with PLUR
  
  Missile-torpedoes are the Caliber nomenclature. The ZM-14 is only the most distant missile of the Caliber range. There is a ZM-54 anti-ship missile with a supersonic stage, and a ZM-54-1 anti-ship missile without a supersonic stage. There are 91R torpedo-missiles of various configurations, etc. It is clear that the torpedo-missile and the GB-type are the development of the Waterfall missile-torpedo. Also, Zircon, in all respects, is a stupid hypersonic modification of Onyx. Therefore, the universal PU is dear to him.
  1. AlexSM
    
    -3
    
    30 October 2020 09: 24
    
    Quote: hrych
    Also Zircon, in all respects stupidly hypersonic modification of Onyx
    
    Yes, and without parameters, it was seen in the video of the Zircon launch and at its start that this is a modification of Onyx))
  2. Boa kaa
    
    +4
    
    31 October 2020 17: 03
    
    Quote: hrych
    Therefore, the universal PU is dear to him.
    
    Greetings old man!
    A few words on the topic. UKSK is essentially a "lattice" where TPKs are inserted together with products. This allows you to: - change the "cartridges" at your discretion (depending on the tasks of the k-la), - not deal with the microclimate and the arsenal service (temperature, humidity, pressure), - connected the connectors and you do not need to bother with the cyclogram (everything is done by the equipment itself products) ...
    therefore
    PLUR is placed into a universal transport and launch container. It houses two modules - launch and combat control, as well as a power supply and a number of auxiliary systems.
    The container layout makes it possible to equip coastlines, naval bases, warships and ships of various classes, railway and automobile platforms with such missiles. Preparing a transport and launch container for a shot takes very little time, since contact with a submarine often lasts minutes, and the system itself is quite simple to use.
    Suffice it to say that PP time = 10 (!) Sec.
    Attention is drawn to the following message: Il-28N, Ka-27PL, and PLA (!) Participated in the firing. About the role of each of them.
    - Il and Ka "found" the submarine, passed SH, D over it. (if on buoys, then V, K is also possible). "Kasatonov" fired on according to aviation data, At the warhead (MPT-1UM or some thread of a new small-sized torpedo), a lower limit was set so that it could not stick into the boat, which was in the echelon below the torpedo and recorded guidance on itself ... for this there were boats - targets, now they are over ... Probably, the guidance was fixed on the submarine, which is why the tests were recognized as successful.
    Somehow, however.
    1. hrych
      
      +1
      
      31 October 2020 17: 45
      
      Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
      Greetings old man!
      
      Hello Wise KAA!
      Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
      boats are targets, now they are over ...
      
      A decoy target, which the submarines shoot, can not be used instead of a target? And the submarine itself should be kept outside the radius of destruction of the missile-torpedo so that it can record the results, but not risk it?
      1. Boa kaa
        
        +2
        
        31 October 2020 20: 22
        
        You cannot put recording equipment on a submarine simulator. And the shooting is experimental, a new product. The pros jump out of their pants: give them the data from their years of work to create their wunderwafe ...
        Secondly, the small-sized torpedo of the new PLUR should locate in the active mode the PLA in the final guidance section to confirm that this is not a "dummy" simulator. Because she leads the search in a passive mode.
        And best of all, in the conditions of universal TMV, boil a sea of 200 kt SBS, and that's it ...
And Makarov

+22

30 October 2020 08: 32

The work is going on, defects are being eliminated. Well done, keep it up
antivirus

-9

30 October 2020 08: 47

began, and so on in all fleets.

and aircraft carriers are still not fired. Shoigu is to blame for everything
1. Insurgent
  
  -4
  
  30 October 2020 09: 14
  
  Quote: antivirus
  and aircraft carriers are still not fired. Shoigu is to blame for everything
  
  The light came together like a wedge on Shoigu and MO ...
  
  First of all, the blame should be placed on the money-grubbing officials who are pulling billions from the treasury, and those who let them down.
  Ask the Ministry of Finance where are investments in industry, production, technology, R&D, where are aircraft carriers and everything else ...
  1. antivirus
    
    -1
    
    30 October 2020 09: 22
    
    Quote: antivirus
    and aircraft carriers are still not fired. Shoigu is to blame for everything
    
    this is a joke squared, trolling of all patriots who are ready to restore the Fleet to the level of the USSR at any cost
    1. Insurgent
      
      +1
      
      30 October 2020 09: 28
      
      Quote: antivirus
      this is a joke squared, trolling of all patriots who are ready to restore the Fleet to the level of the USSR at any cost
      
      Will it be considered trolling if I declare that the power of the Russian Navy, in the name of the country's security, must surpass the level of the USSR?
      
      There are several ways to achieve this level of power. It's just a matter of choosing the right concept and means to achieve this goal.
      1. Serg65
        
        +2
        
        30 October 2020 10: 05
        
        Quote: Insurgent
        the power of the Russian Navy, in the name of the country's security, must surpass the level of the USSR
        
        and what was the powerful level of the Soviet Navy?
    2. Serg65
      
      +2
      
      30 October 2020 10: 04
      
      Only short-lived people want to restore the fleet to the level of the USSR, because the USSR fleet ... at least the surface one, was very outdated in the total mass of ships!
      1. Insurgent
        
        +1
        
        30 October 2020 11: 25
        
        Quote: Serg65
        Only short-lived people want to restore the fleet to the level of the USSR, because the USSR fleet ... at least the surface one, was very outdated in the total mass of ships!
        
        Of course of course...
        
        Only the heavy nuclear missile cruisers of project 1144 "Orlan" were built in the USSR and laid down on the stocks - "Kirov", "Admiral Lazarev", "Admiral Nakhimov" and "Peter the Great" ...
        Plus to this - Project 1164 Atlant missile cruisers, similarly built and laid on the stocks - Moscow (Glory), Marshal Ustinov, Varyag, Ukraine (Admiral of the Fleet Lobov) ...
        Destroyers, BOD, BDK, DKVP, MRK ...
        I forgot about TAKR ...
        There is nothing to strive for ...
        
        Alexey RA
        
        +2
        
        30 October 2020 13: 33
        
        Quote: Insurgent
        Only the heavy nuclear missile cruisers of project 1144 "Orlan" were built in the USSR and laid down on the stocks - "Kirov", "Admiral Lazarev", "Admiral Nakhimov" and "Peter the Great" ...
        
        4 ships in 15 years (according to the plan, the delivery of "Petr" was to be in 1992). By the time the latter was built, the first had already become obsolete. As a result, we received one combat-ready cruiser for each ocean-going fleet (the second is under repair). Moreover, these CDs could operate only within the radius of their coastal aviation.
        Quote: Insurgent
        Plus to this - Project 1164 Atlant missile cruisers, similarly built and laid on the stocks - Moscow (Glory), Marshal Ustinov, Varyag, Ukraine (Admiral of the Fleet Lobov) ...
        
        The only, perhaps, normal ships of our Navy. True, with a hole in the air defense in the nose sectors.
        Quote: Insurgent
        Destroyers, BOD
        
        Yeah ... either a boiler-turbine miracle with "short-range" anti-ship missiles and single-beam air defense systems, or a gas-turbine BOD with air defense only for self-defense and without anti-ship missiles.
        
        Serg65
        
        +4
        
        30 October 2020 14: 30
        
        Quote: Alexey RA
        either a boiler-turbine miracle with "short-range" anti-ship missiles and single-beam air defense systems, or a gas-turbine BOD with air defense only for self-defense and without anti-ship missiles
        
        Well, Alexey, do not judge strictly, in those days such a global trend was in the ship's air defense ...
        
        Serg65
        
        +2
        
        30 October 2020 14: 28
        
        Quote: Insurgent
        Of course of course
        
        Now, could you calculate the percentage of the named ships to the rest of the mass of surface ships? Well, just to be surprised!
        Quote: Insurgent
        Plus to this - Project 1164 Atlant missile cruisers, similarly built and laid on the stocks - Moskva (Slava), Marshal Ustinov, Varyag, Ukraine (Admiral of the Fleet Lobov)
        
        The frigate mentioned in the article of the series surpasses any of the Atlans in its main caliber!
        Quote: Insurgent
        There is nothing to strive for
        
        And here I completely agree with you
        
        Insurgent
        
        -7
        
        30 October 2020 14: 49
        
        Quote: Serg65
        The frigate mentioned in the article of the series surpasses any of the Atlans in its main caliber!
        
        What are you saying ? true ? And strong, strong? Considering that this is the last century ...
        
        AK-130, "double-barreled" on "Ustinov" with characteristics:
        
        Gun characteristics
        
        Caliber, mm 130
        Barrel length, mm/calibers 9100/70
        The initial velocity of the projectile,
        m/s 850 m/s
        Rate of fire
        shots per minute 90 rds / min. for installation
        
        Gun mount specifications
        Stem angle, ° 85
        Maximum firing range, m 23
        
        Against A-192:
        
        Gun characteristics
        
        Caliber, mm 130
        Loading principle automatic
        Rate of fire
        shots per minute 30
        
        Gun mount specifications
        
        Total mass of AC, kg 25
        Stem angle, ° −15/+85
        Maximum firing range, m 23
        Height reach, m 18
        
        Serg65
        
        +7
        
        30 October 2020 14: 56
        
        Quote: Insurgent
        AK-130, "double-barreled gun" on "Ustinov" with characteristics
        
        Excuse me, buddy, but for Ustinov the AK-130 is an auxiliary caliber, just like the A-192 for the frigate !!!!
        
        Insurgent
        
        -5
        
        30 October 2020 15: 05
        
        Quote: Serg65
        Excuse me, buddy, but for Ustinov the AK-130 is an auxiliary caliber, just like the A-192 for the frigate !!!!
        
        I'm not sorry, for without mentioning what is under main caliber you mean URO, not artillery, it looks like at least an oversight ...
        
        Serg65
        
        +4
        
        2 November 2020 07: 50
        
        Quote: Insurgent
        I will not excuse you, because without mentioning that by the main caliber you mean URO, and not artillery, it looks like at least an oversight ...
        
        Well, then again, excuse me for my purely professional opinion, because we are talking about URO ships, and not about artillery ships.
        
        Insurgent
        
        -8
        
        2 November 2020 08: 03
        
        Quote: Serg65
        Well, then again, excuse me for my purely professional opinion, because we are talking about URO ships, and not about artillery ships.
        
        "Purely professional"? Hmm Could you tell me then in what units the caliber of "Onyx" or "Granite" is measured, for example, according to what parameters - the diameter of the body, or the span of the bearing planes, and where, in which correct source documents, these parameters are the "center" ones that determine the properties URO?
        
        This is data from Wiki, but maybe you will indicate other sources from your professional heights, where the characteristics of URO are at least partially determined by their caliber?
        
        The performance characteristics of the rocket 3M55
        
        Rocket length:
        Ship variant - 8 m (8,6)
        Aviation option - 6,1 m
        Rocket Diameter: 0,67 m
        Wingspan: 1,7 m
        TPN Length: 8,9 m
        TPS Diameter: 0,72 m
        Rocket weight:
        Starting - 3000 kg
        With TPN - 3900 kg
        Maximum speed: 884 m / s (M = 2,6, or 3182 km / h at altitude)
        Surface speed: M = 2 (2448 km / h)
        Engine:
        Starting - solid fuel starting and starting stage
        Marching - ramjet, mass 200 kg, thrust 4 t
        Fuel - T-6 Kerosene
        Range: P-800 Onyx up to 600 km.
        From 120 to 300 km depending on altitude (export version "Yakhont")
        
        Flight height:
        On the marching section - up to 14000 m
        At the final section - 10-15 m
        Control system:
        On the marching section - inertial + radio altimeter
        At the final site, an all-weather monopulse active-passive radar-assisted radar homing system, with frequency hopping
        Target detection range (in active mode) - at least 50 km
        Maximum target search angle - ± 45 °
        GSN noise immunity: the developer claims to be high, including from active leading interference, dipole clouds, etc.
        Ready to work from the moment of switching on: no more than 2 min
        Current consumption on the 27 V circuit: no more than 38 A
        Weight RLGSN - 85 kg
        GOS working conditions:
        Excitement of the sea - up to 7 points
        Warhead weight: 200 kg (KR "Yakhont"), 300 kg (KR "Onyx")
        
        Serg65
        
        -1
        
        3 November 2020 09: 01
        
        Quote: Insurgent
        maybe you will indicate other sources from your professional heights
        
        Unlike the land units, the navy is rich in traditions and takes naming innovations very hard! The main caliber is the ship's main weapon ... not ammunition, but weapons !!! The main weapon of the URO ship is the missile COMPLEX, and the cannon tower on the bow is an auxiliary medium caliber!
        Main caliber artillery - part of the naval artillery having the largest caliber and solving the main tasks inherent in this class of ships
        
        What are the main tasks of the URO ship? That's right ... launching a missile strike on ships or enemy territory!
        
        Insurgent
        
        -4
        
        3 November 2020 09: 09
        
        Quote: Serg65
        What are the main tasks of the URO ship? That's right ... launching a missile strike on ships or enemy territory!
        
        Quote: Serg65
        Main caliber artillery - part of the ship's artillery, which has the largest caliber and solves the main tasksinherent in this class of ships
        
        Here are just a rocket, this is not artillery ammunition, but a missile defense system, not an artillery system.
        
        Therefore - the statement about the URO as about "main caliber"- categorically not correct and not professional from any point of view
        
        Do not deepen the hole, arguing with the obviousness of your mistake, otherwise doubts about your competence will only increase.
        
        And you can't fix it with "cons" ...
        
        Serg65
        
        -1
        
        3 November 2020 09: 29
        
        Quote: Insurgent
        Here is just a rocket, this is not artillery ammunition.
        
        Come on? Why then are the missile units called rocket artillery units? Or is it the same tradition?
        Quote: Insurgent
        Therefore, the statement about the URO as the "main caliber" is categorically incorrect and not professional from any point of view
        
        Well, you know better!
        Quote: Insurgent
        Do not deepen the hole, arguing with the obviousness of your mistake, otherwise doubts about your competence will only increase.
        
        Your pride just touches me!
        Quote: Insurgent
        doubts about your competence will only increase.
        
        Well, I already noticed that you are competent in everything!
        Quote: Insurgent
        And you can't fix it with "cons"
        
        One day you will realize that your true greatness begins where your pride ends.
        
        I do not suffer from "cons" ....
        
        Insurgent
        
        -7
        
        3 November 2020 09: 37
        
        Quote: Serg65
        Quote: Insurgent
        Here is just a rocket, this is not artillery ammunition.
        
        Come on? Why then are the missile units called rocket artillery units? Or is it the same tradition?
        
        Absolutely! In the US Army, as a tribute to tradition, there are cavalry units on helicopters ...
        Quote: Serg65
        Well, I already noticed that you are competent in everything!
        
        When did you have time? For example, I drew attention only to your "professional view" in relation to the "main caliber", you, however, assessed me "round" ...
        
        Global, you however ...
        
        BDRM 667
        
        +2
        
        3 November 2020 10: 29
        
        After reading your definitions main caliber, it seems that you are ready to call it a ram of an antique trireme, just to prove your "professionalism" ...
        
        Quote: Serg65
        Unlike the land units, the navy is rich in traditions and takes naming innovations very hard!
        
        Quote: Serg65
        Come on? Why then are the missile units called rocket artillery units? Or is it the same tradition?
        
        Admiral, stop dishonoring the Fleet ...
        
        We got into a puddle with the definition of missiles as the "main caliber", and not the main strike weapons system, so have the honor to admit it, so as not to play around like a careless midshipman on the exam.
        
        Serg65
        
        0
        
        3 November 2020 11: 49
        
        Quote: BDRM 667
        After reading your definitions of the main caliber, it seems that you are ready to call them the ram of an antique trireme, just to prove your "professionalism" ...
        
        God be with him, and what side are you to the Delta?
        
        BastaKarapuzik And
        
        +1
        
        31 October 2020 18: 57
        
        Quote: Insurgent
        AK-130, "double-barreled gun" on "Ustinov" with characteristics
        
        The mass of the AK-130, together with a cellar of 150 tons, is shocking! A real monster.
        The A-192 cannon is much lighter; it can be installed on ships slightly larger than a corvette.
        Three A-192 guns will fire the same 90 rounds, but judging by the numbers, they will still weigh less.
        
        antivirus
        
        +2
        
        30 October 2020 14: 36
        
        Destroyers, BOD, BDK, DKVP, MRK ...
        I forgot about TAKR ...
        There is nothing to strive for
        
        -do not argue with geniuses-naval commanders
        from the minuses and pluses of ships and ... ankle boots will not be added
2. Serg65
  
  +5
  
  30 October 2020 10: 02
  
  Quote: antivirus
  aircraft carriers are still not fired. Shoigu is to blame for everything
  
  Yes, the followers of Casey Fury are to blame for everything, they have already received an order to destroy American aircraft carriers ... and if the Americans do not have aircraft carriers, then why should we build them ???
  1. novel66
    
    +5
    
    30 October 2020 12: 58
    
    Well, I finally saw the light! Hello
    1. Serg65
      
      0
      
      30 October 2020 14: 23
      
      Healthy! Sarcasm is not an epiphany!
3. Vladimir1155
  
  -4
  
  30 October 2020 10: 27
  
  Quote: antivirus
  and aircraft carriers are still not fired
  
  Nobody needs aircraft carriers, it is right that they do not build, well done wise Shoigu, and PLO is the main task of frigates and he needs modern means of destruction of submarines ... even Kuzya needs to be sold to India to China, and instead to make submarines, coastal aviation
4. novel66
  
  +2
  
  30 October 2020 10: 44
  
  we don't need them
  1. Russ
    
    +5
    
    30 October 2020 12: 32
    
    we don't need them
    
    Novel Do I hear that from you?
    1. novel66
      
      +2
      
      30 October 2020 12: 56
      
      from whom else? I am always in this position ours to you! where do we know each other?
      1. Russ
        
        +4
        
        30 October 2020 13: 10
        
        I have stood and will stand on that!
        Yes, so ... passed by ...
        
        novel66
        
        +4
        
        30 October 2020 13: 13
        
        do not pass by!
        
        Russ
        
        +4
        
        30 October 2020 13: 16
        
        Bam, bam! And to the point ...
Stirbjorn

-3

30 October 2020 08: 51

It remains only to set up frigates, so far only two pieces
1. Sandor Clegane
  
  +5
  
  30 October 2020 09: 05
  
  Quote: Stirbjorn
  It remains only to set up frigates, so far only two pieces
  
  there are no problems with the construction of the hulls, and there were no problems, the puffs were with air defense, a turbine, a gearbox.
2. Vladimir1155
  
  +1
  
  30 October 2020 10: 31
  
  there are already more of them in construction, and the old ones are 1155 = 7, 11356 = 3, krv to ten, and two admirals, there are still a lot of them in the building already on the stocks ... with the construction of frigates and corvettes, everything is just fine, there are enough of them new ... the problem of an acute shortage of nuclear submarines, minesweepers and coastal aviation is an order of magnitude more acute.
  1. Stirbjorn
    
    +2
    
    30 October 2020 14: 58
    
    Quote: vladimir1155
    everything is fine with the construction of frigates and corvettes, there are enough of them and there are new ones ..
    They build very slowly, especially frigates. The same minesweepers, one piece per year, are commissioning SNSZ and promise to double the pace
Ge2an

-5

30 October 2020 09: 00

I would advise equipping them with anti-drone air defense systems .. Otherwise, it will turn out like with tanks in Nagorno-Karabakh ..
1. Mountain shooter
  
  +9
  
  30 October 2020 09: 11
  
  Quote: Ge2an
  I would advise equipping them with anti-drone air defense systems .. Otherwise, it will turn out like with tanks in Nagorno-Karabakh ..
  
  Drone versus 5000-ton ship? What size should it be? Not to mention the fact that the drone is over the sea, and there are winds, waves, poor visibility ... Only if, as a scout ... It gets into the antenna zone, and roasts like a crow on the fly ...
  1. ZEMCH
    
    +1
    
    31 October 2020 03: 12
    
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    Not to mention that the drone is over the sea, and there are winds, waves, poor visibility ...
    
    I agree, but also the target search area
2. KCA
  
  +4
  
  30 October 2020 09: 27
  
  Is the AK-192 not enough? 2 types of anti-aircraft projectiles, rate of fire 30 rounds per minute, even if a 130mm anti-aircraft projectile misses and explodes about 30 meters away, the drone is enough
  1. Garris199
    
    +1
    
    30 October 2020 23: 56
    
    Yes, and with the air defense system there is order, this is not an ancient wasp for you.
Alien From

+1

30 October 2020 09: 17

Rockets are good. We are waiting, if only the deadlines are not shifted.
common man

+2

30 October 2020 09: 17

If a new rocket-torpedo is launched from the UKS, then using external target designation they can be launched by all other "caliber carriers"? Including RTOs?
1. ZEMCH
  
  +1
  
  31 October 2020 03: 14
  
  Quote: man in the street
  If a new rocket-torpedo is launched from the UKS, then using external target designation they can be launched by all other "caliber carriers"? Including RTOs?
  
  No, they cannot ((Masso-gabbrites will not allow and control center from what to get?
CommanderDIVA

+1

30 October 2020 09: 21

As I understand it, the plur will be located in the USK, together with the PKR and CR, is the start of all these missiles "cold"? And after the start, the pluru at what distance from the ship should it submerge in the water at the place of the intended location of the target based on world practice? Do our likely opponents have analogs to plur? Who can comment from the knowledgeable?
1. Avior
  
  0
  
  30 October 2020 09: 55
  
  Of course I have
  American Asrok. RUM139. Available in different versions.
  The range is 28 km, it is planned to increase the range by 4-5 times for firing at external target designation.
2. Avior
  
  +1
  
  30 October 2020 10: 12
  Start Asrok
  
  The rocket is unguided.
  After a specified time after starting the engine will get off the torpedo descends on a parachute.
  At close range, Americans use small anti-submarine torpedoes
  They are unified for the Americans - for Asrok, torpedo tubes, helicopters
Old26

+1

30 October 2020 12: 43

Quote: AlexSM
Quote: hrych
Also Zircon, in all respects stupidly hypersonic modification of Onyx

Yes, and without parameters, it was seen in the video of the Zircon launch and at its start that this is a modification of Onyx))

And how does the start of "Zircon" differ from the start of the same "Caliber" and "Onyx", or "Zircon". What exactly does it show that the Onyx modification is starting?

Quote: Serg65
Only short-lived people want to restore the fleet to the level of the USSR, because the USSR fleet ... at least the surface one, was very outdated in the total mass of ships!

Maybe not very outdated, but the diversity was the scourge of the fleet. Which is easier to build and maintain? 5 or 6 dozen of the same type of destroyers or limit the series of ships to 4-7 pennants

Quote: CommanderDIVA
As I understand it, the plur will be located in the USK, together with the missile defense and the cr, the start of all these missiles is "cold"?
No. All of them start on the starting and accelerating engine. Mortar launch, like ICBMs they do not have ...
1. Alexey RA
  
  +2
  
  30 October 2020 14: 27
  
  Quote: Old26
  Maybe not very outdated, but the diversity was the scourge of the fleet. Which is easier to build and maintain? 5 or 6 dozen of the same type of destroyers or limit the series of ships to 4-7 pennants
  
  Uh-huh ... and we must also take into account that the already small series were also divided into 3-4 fleets.
Old26

+3

30 October 2020 15: 30

Quote: Alexey RA
Uh-huh ... and we must also take into account that the already small series were also divided into 3-4 fleets.

3-4 is unlikely, but 2 is for sure
Lexus

+1

31 October 2020 02: 03

What does "high-precision" weapons mean in relation to anti-submarine weapons? Either hit or not.