Military Review

The Ministry of Defense showed a video of the launch of a new missile defense system

67
The Ministry of Defense showed a video of the launch of a new missile defense system

A video of the test of a new missile defense system that took place at the Sary-Shagan training ground in Kazakhstan on October 28 this year has appeared on the Web. The video was posted on its official YouTube channel by the Russian Ministry of Defense.


The video of the military department shows the advance of a convoy of military vehicles to the training ground, the loading of an anti-missile into the mine, as well as the launch itself, filmed from several angles.

As previously reported by the Ministry of Defense, on October 28, 2020, a test launch of a new missile defense missile was carried out at the Sary-Shagan training ground, the launched missile successfully hit a conditional target.


According to the commander of the anti-missile defense of the Aerospace Forces, Major General Sergei Grabchuk, after a series of tests, the new anti-missile has authentically confirmed the inherent characteristics.

(...) combat crews successfully completed the mission, hitting a conditional target with a given accuracy

- added the general.

As already noted, the military department does not disclose the details of the tests, but with a high probability it can be argued that a new PRS-1M (53T6M) antimissile of a new production was tested, which is a near-echelon antimissile of the new anti-missile defense system of Moscow and the Central Industrial Region A-235 (RTC-181M, ROC "Airplane-M").
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Orkraider
    Orkraider 29 October 2020 14: 15 New
    +9
    Good devil laughing
    Start happy! good
    1. Stasi
      Stasi 29 October 2020 14: 20 New
      10

      Quote: Orkraider
      Start happy!


      Another view on this topic:

      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Stasi
          Stasi 29 October 2020 14: 31 New
          +2
          Quote: VORON538
          Haters are coming

          Let them run yes ... Good for health.
          1. VORON538
            VORON538 29 October 2020 14: 34 New
            -1
            So they run, as they work, everyone is on the couch, at the computer, scribbling angry comments. laughing
            1. Lexus
              Lexus 29 October 2020 15: 07 New
              -49 qualifying.
              So where did this missile go? Again, only in the air and budget?
              My congratulations to the urya skakuas. Finally, later 56 yearshowever, Putin's Russia has caught up with the FSA. Allow me to beat for joy ... Urrryayayayayayaya ... laughing



              I will not even post a video about the long-range intercept missile "Spartan".
              I’m sorry for you. You are already blissful. Every day you rejoice at the same thing.
              1. LiSiCyn
                LiSiCyn 29 October 2020 15: 31 New
                24
                Quote: lexus
                My congratulations to the urya skakuas. Finally, after 56 years, however, Putin's Russia has caught up with the FSA.

                What country are you writing about? I know one Russia and it is written without the prefix "Putin". Do you live in an alternate reality?
                Quote: lexus
                So where did this missile go? Again, only in the air and budget?

                I hit the target. The one that had to be intercepted. You can be sure.
                Quote: lexus
                Allow me to beat for joy ...

                And you, who is that to allow ??? With such ambitions, be afraid of the orderlies ... I hope they are already coming for you.
                1. Mimoprohodil
                  Mimoprohodil 29 October 2020 15: 51 New
                  -7
                  Quote: LiSiCyn
                  I hit the target. The one that had to be intercepted. You can be sure.
                  conditionally hit the conditional target. S-400 (and S-300V4) does not shoot down target targets, but target missiles
                  1. LiSiCyn
                    LiSiCyn 29 October 2020 16: 27 New
                    +8
                    Quote: Mimoprohodil
                    S-400 (and S-300V4) does not shoot down target targets, but target missiles

                    Now they will tell you what kind of target, with what speed it flew ... Nudol, completely classified from the word. The tests were successful, Combat missions completed, that's all.
                    1. krot
                      krot 29 October 2020 17: 28 New
                      +1
                      Good devil

                      I agree. And like flying straight!
                    2. Mimoprohodil
                      Mimoprohodil 29 October 2020 18: 42 New
                      -2
                      Quote: LiSiCyn
                      Now they will tell you what the target is, how fast it flew
                      Suffice it to say: "we hit the target missile successfully." What's the secret here?
                2. Ka-52
                  Ka-52 30 October 2020 05: 51 New
                  +5
                  The Lexus always burns from the bottom when something goes well in the Russian Armed Forces. Now, if the interceptor flew past, or even better fell at the start, here Lexus would spit the whole monitor with joy. He is either from the Limitrophes or from the Independents - both of them hate Russia and rejoice only in its failures
                  1. LiSiCyn
                    LiSiCyn 30 October 2020 09: 03 New
                    0
                    Quote: Ka-52
                    He's either from the Limitrophes or from the Independents

                    Ours he, Russian ... He has phantom pains, in the Union. Well, and envy, to more successful fellow citizens.
              2. hrych
                hrych 29 October 2020 17: 00 New
                +7
                Quote: lexus
                Every day you rejoice at the same thing.

                Do you grieve every day?
                1. Slavenin82
                  Slavenin82 29 October 2020 20: 28 New
                  +2
                  It is necessary not interrogatively, but in the affirmative, GET IT!
                2. Interlocutor
                  Interlocutor 29 October 2020 20: 44 New
                  +2
                  Do you grieve every day?

                  He's not grieving. He's with a deflector. He spits in his reflection in the morning.
              3. bayard
                bayard 29 October 2020 17: 09 New
                12
                Quote: lexus
                I’m sorry for you. You are already blissful. Every day you rejoice at the same thing.

                Young man, have you at least got to know the subject?
                Which country was the first to intercept ballistic missiles?
                Which country was the FIRST to have its own missile defense system?
                And remained valid to this day?
                This rocket is essentially an upgrade of this system, and the A-235 complex missile is a continuation and development of the A-135 complex missile. And even the launch is carried out from the mine of the same - still a Soviet rocket.
                And comparative testing of both systems (USA and Russia) in the 90s showed a significant advantage in the sensitivity of receivers and target designation accuracy of the Don-2 over the Cobra-Dane.
                So take care of your bile and mental health, they will still come in handy.
            2. mig29mks
              mig29mks 29 October 2020 16: 39 New
              +1
              It's just a pity that the rocket is for Moscow and for something central there.
              1. Machito
                Machito 29 October 2020 22: 24 New
                -2
                Quote: mig29mks
                It's just a pity that the rocket is for Moscow and for something central there.

                This central something is home to 25 million people, only every sixth Russian.
                1. Kruglov
                  Kruglov 30 October 2020 09: 07 New
                  +1
                  More. In Moscow alone, every day 25-27 million are thrown into toilets. The sewage system for the shit exhaust has counted. And how much more behind the garages ?!
  2. Polite Moose
    Polite Moose 29 October 2020 14: 19 New
    15
    Yes. The rocket's energy is impressive. Although recently there were similar footage of tests, but you can endlessly look at this.
  3. denis obuckov
    denis obuckov 29 October 2020 14: 29 New
    -1
    The American nuclear arsenal is getting closer to zero.
    1. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 29 October 2020 14: 36 New
      0
      Quote: denis obuckov
      The American nuclear arsenal is getting closer to zero.

      To which?
  4. Astra55
    Astra55 29 October 2020 14: 30 New
    +8
    Still interesting. How did she “hit the conditional target”?
    Did you go to a given area in a certain time or what?
    The warhead is special.
    Kinetic interception in relation to this missile seems to be out of the question.
    1. Kent0001
      Kent0001 29 October 2020 14: 35 New
      0
      went into a given area and blew up a special munition of low power - well, as an option for discussion))))
    2. KCA
      KCA 29 October 2020 14: 41 New
      0
      Do you have exact information about which rocket was launched? MO does not report anything about this, but from an article on VO:
      According to some reports, 53T6M missiles or similar missiles in theory can also carry a conventional warhead.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 29 October 2020 16: 02 New
        +4
        Quote: KCA
        Do you have exact information about which rocket was launched?

        Nudol was launched. Watch the first launch of the A-235 and find 10 differences.
        1. Observer2014
          Observer2014 29 October 2020 17: 46 New
          -6
          Quote: NEXUS
          Quote: KCA
          Do you have exact information about which rocket was launched?

          Nudol was launched. Watch the first launch of the A-235 and find 10 differences.

          Yes, there are no differences. As well as not when launching from Soviet times! Hi Andrew. hi
    3. avdkrd
      avdkrd 29 October 2020 14: 53 New
      0
      Quote: Astra55
      Kinetic interception in relation to this missile seems to be out of the question.

      Where does the information come from? The Americans have mastered kinetic interception long ago.
      In principle, if we are talking about the A-235, then the short-range intercept missile is the PRS-1M (45T6). The main difference from the previous version of the PRS-1 (53T6) is an increase in the far border of the affected area, an increase in the maneuverability of antimissiles, as well as equipping antimissiles with a new warhead (those tasks, according to the Ministry of Defense contract from 1991, Almaz-Antey has actually been doing this since 2010. ).
      Here is a new warhead and provides kinetic interception.
      1. Astra55
        Astra55 29 October 2020 15: 57 New
        +4
        It is precisely that the Americans have mastered kinetic interception long ago.
        Their Strategic ABM (analogous to our Moscow ABM), deployed in Alaska and California, is represented by 44 GBI missiles with a range of up to 5500 km. In this case, the speed of the transatmospheric kinetic The EKV interceptor can be higher than the first space one, that is, in fact, it is launched into Earth's orbit and can hit a target at any point above the planet.
        In addition, the US non-strategic missile defense is represented by the well-known Aegis and the SM-3 missile, deployed on destroyers, cruisers and ground installations, target destruction is carried out by an exoatmospheric kinetic interceptor equipped with its own correction engines. The maximum target hitting range for the SM-3 Block IIA modification is 2500 kilometers, the target hitting altitude is 1500 kilometers (most likely, external target designation is required). The missile's speed is about 4,5-5 kilometers per second.
        A list of targets, albeit training ones, hit by the Aegis missile defense system: in 2007, a group (2 units) ballistic target was successfully intercepted at an altitude of about 180 kilometers; in 2008, an emergency reconnaissance satellite USA-247 was shot down at an altitude of 193 kilometers; in 2011 In 2014, a successful interception of an intermediate-range ballistic missile was carried out; in XNUMX, a simultaneous interception of two cruise missiles and one ballistic missile over the Pacific Ocean was carried out.
        Everyone knows the number of Tikanderog and Arlie Berkov, theoretically they can load up to 9000 pieces of SM-3.


        It seems to me alone that we are slightly behind a potential partner in missile defense issues? It is ABM.
        1. KCA
          KCA 29 October 2020 17: 18 New
          +5
          In the USSR, the first kinetic interceptions of warheads were back in 1961 with V-1000 missiles, if there is no widespread use now, then the number of disadvantages exceeds the advantages. For example, the Americans themselves calculated that to destroy 20 missiles, 250 kinetic interceptors would be required, well, of course, if you shoot at your targets, the flight of which is calculated in advance, long before the start, with maximum accuracy and the most convenient trajectory for missile defense, then the chance of hit increases , and then managed to miss
        2. bayard
          bayard 29 October 2020 17: 37 New
          +3
          Quote: Astra55
          It seems to me alone that we are slightly behind a potential partner in missile defense issues? It is ABM

          The A-135 system entered the database earlier than the American missile defense systems, and it is still combat-ready. The A-235 is essentially its modernization, which makes it possible to abandon the anti-missile nuclear warheads in favor of the high-explosive ones.
          And do not try to prove to me that a log of a synthetic warhead of American interceptor missiles is more effective.
        3. Interlocutor
          Interlocutor 29 October 2020 20: 46 New
          0
          It seems to me alone that we are slightly behind a potential partner in missile defense issues? It is ABM

          Do you know what a charcoal eye is?
        4. mister-red
          mister-red 29 October 2020 23: 50 New
          0
          It seems to me alone that we are slightly behind a potential partner in missile defense issues? It is ABM.

          No, not alone. The United States withdrew from the missile defense for a reason, they had something already then. And yes, they came off.
          And in fact, according to your long text - as far as I remember, their long-range missile hits something when they know all the parameters of the target. I do not think that someone will inform them if something happens. So if these 44 missiles are shot down with a dozen warheads, then in principle it will be good.
    4. Errr
      Errr 29 October 2020 14: 55 New
      +1
      Quote: Astra55
      The warhead is special.
      Kinetic interception in relation to this missile seems to be out of the question.
      The warhead of the 53T6M anti-missile is not yet a "kinetic log", but it is no longer a special one ... smile
      However, the 53T6M will be equipped with conventional (most likely, fragmentation) warheads, which are considered safer in operation and when intercepting a ballistic target.
      A source: https://tvoi54.ru/posts/1825-zapredelnyi-perehvat-rezultaty-ispytanii-novoi-rossiiskoi-rakety-pro-53t6m.html
    5. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 29 October 2020 15: 09 New
      +6
      Our people usually launched Poplar and shot down over Sara Shagan. The Amers did not like it very much, 2500 km from Kapustin Yar, or even less. But ours sent the USA with their Wishlist in the forest. Something like this.
  5. denis obuckov
    denis obuckov 29 October 2020 14: 30 New
    +4
    The US will be unhappy. Permission for testing from the American chief was not received.
    1. VORON538
      VORON538 29 October 2020 14: 36 New
      +4
      They will be satisfied only if there is a new hump or Yeltsin who will give the go-ahead to cut these products into pieces. hi
  6. Kent0001
    Kent0001 29 October 2020 14: 33 New
    +3
    The couple somehow very quickly left ... How Cicron probably or faster? What's its approximate speed? I think the Pentagon is definitely depressed, although they don't admit it ...
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 29 October 2020 14: 42 New
      +5
      Many times faster.
      But the Pentagon has known about her for a long time. The rocket, in principle, is not new.
      There are options for it.
      Here's how it looks without a container:
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 29 October 2020 16: 07 New
        +6
        Quote: voyaka uh
        But the Pentagon has known about her for a long time. The rocket, in principle, is not new.

        So they test her and bring her to be as reliable as Cupid. It’s not a couple of years to serve her. The rocket is essentially new, although it is a modernized version of the A-135, but there is not much left of the Amur, so we can confidently talk about a new rocket, while having very impressive performance characteristics, seeing how it starts.
      2. Bersaglieri
        Bersaglieri 29 October 2020 16: 07 New
        0
        This is not the rocket. So here: PRS-1 https://missilery.info/missile/53t6
    2. Errr
      Errr 29 October 2020 15: 08 New
      +2
      Quote: Kent0001
      The couple somehow very quickly left ... How Cicron probably or faster? What's its approximate speed?
      In the modernized version, 53T6 has become much faster.
      In the first seconds after launch, the anti-missile can reach speeds of up to 4 km / s.
      A source: https://tvoi54.ru/posts/1825-zapredelnyi-perehvat-rezultaty-ispytanii-novoi-rossiiskoi-rakety-pro-53t6m.html
    3. Errr
      Errr 29 October 2020 15: 35 New
      +1
      According to Western data, 23.12.2018/14/042. The 17A1864 rocket of the Nudol complex flew 9 miles in 3 minutes at an average speed of Mach XNUMX (XNUMX km / s).
      A source: http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-806.html
  7. Generator Systems
    Generator Systems 29 October 2020 14: 38 New
    +4
    I'm glad that at least something new appears somewhere)
  8. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 29 October 2020 14: 40 New
    +4
    Nudol tears up brutally.
    She needs to climb 100 km in a couple of seconds in order to have time to meet an ICBM warhead falling by MAX 20.
    1. _Ugene_
      _Ugene_ 29 October 2020 17: 51 New
      0
      100 km in a couple of seconds
      well you turned it down, there was information about the maximum speed of 7 km / s, maybe a little more, but not 50
  9. Thrifty
    Thrifty 29 October 2020 14: 42 New
    +1
    Yesterday it seemed like they broke spears on this subject! One member of the forum was especially atrocious, claiming that the rocket was almost 40 (was present at her birth, you see laughing ), and that this junk was tricked (you see, he himself commanded a brigade of hacks, who rocked a rocket in his garage laughing )! Where did they get it? crying I would like to know his opinion, do we have a democracy? ?? belay belay wassat
    1. VORON538
      VORON538 29 October 2020 14: 48 New
      +1
      His shift has not started yet wink
  10. rocket757
    rocket757 29 October 2020 14: 55 New
    +2
    One, two ... half a hundred missiles can be intercepted.
    But no one can stop a global, massive strike! For now, at least.
    The world rests on the definition of an irresistible retaliation, this is an axiom that all sorts of people are trying to refute.
    1. _Ugene_
      _Ugene_ 29 October 2020 17: 47 New
      +1
      One, two ... half a hundred missiles can be intercepted.
      so this may be enough, they do not cover the whole country, but Moscow and the Moscow Region, and no one will shoot fifty missiles there
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 29 October 2020 18: 21 New
        0
        They will cover it, conditionally, of course, and then what?
        1. _Ugene_
          _Ugene_ 30 October 2020 10: 02 New
          0
          you need to ask them this
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 30 October 2020 18: 46 New
            0
            Those who decided so, signed a contract, now it is hardly possible to find out something.
            And he himself wondered why this is necessary?
            1. _Ugene_
              _Ugene_ 30 October 2020 19: 06 New
              0
              I mean to ask why they only cover Moscow, but I think the answer is obvious - it is sooo expensive and our budget cannot cover all important regions of the country
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 30 October 2020 19: 17 New
                0
                Expensive, technically difficult ... it's all clear. But after all, the contract also established where it was possible and where it was not.
                By the way, new technologies, new complexes will slightly expand the coverage area of ​​the missile defense system. But then again, how many such systems are needed in our vast territory!
                We return to the fact that the best / only defense is our vigorous loaves, which are always ready to fly where they need to go.
  11. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 29 October 2020 15: 01 New
    +1
    Directly caught a portion of the militaristic buzz from this start. No kidding)
  12. Ural resident
    Ural resident 29 October 2020 15: 10 New
    0
    The start-up is fast, and then what - the main engines turn on? does she just disappear into smoke?
  13. Sergey Kulikov_3
    Sergey Kulikov_3 29 October 2020 15: 23 New
    0
    This missile threatens NATO's democratic missiles, this is the new offensive weapon of the Russians :)
  14. Bersaglieri
    Bersaglieri 29 October 2020 16: 05 New
    +2
    By the same type, the starting accelerator on the Zircon (this is to the question of some, "what kind of flash and why did it all disappear at once?") TTRD with ultrafast combustion and acceleration to 100g +
    1. Errr
      Errr 29 October 2020 16: 32 New
      +1
      Quote: Bersaglieri
      ... with ultra-fast burning and acceleration to 100g +
      This thing can withstand up to 300 g. smile
      1. Bersaglieri
        Bersaglieri 29 October 2020 17: 14 New
        +1
        Others will not stand, because only 100-150 :)
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 29 October 2020 16: 39 New
      +2
      In this case, to call it an accelerator is not very correct. recourse
      This is the first step. The rocket is two-stage.
      At Zircon, yes - first a booster (solid fuel accelerator) and, then, the CR engine is turned on.
      1. Bersaglieri
        Bersaglieri 29 October 2020 17: 13 New
        +1
        For Zircon, it is an accelerator. And the PRS has the first stage
  15. yfast
    yfast 29 October 2020 17: 39 New
    +1
    Dagger here instead of the second stage and hello to the American base in Poland in a minute. Although, probably, in "Dagger" all electronics will fall off from hundreds of g.
    1. Bersaglieri
      Bersaglieri 29 October 2020 19: 38 New
      +1
      No, not that perfect.
  16. Adimius38
    Adimius38 29 October 2020 21: 29 New
    -2
    and the sense of this start. The Americans are creating missile defense systems along their entire perimeter at close and distant approaches. And we have one defense of Moscow laughing
  17. Old26
    Old26 29 October 2020 23: 26 New
    +2
    Quote: KCA
    According to some reports, 53T6M missiles or similar missiles in theory can also carry a conventional warhead.

    Yes, for the 53T6M rocket, a conventional charge was also worked out. But 53T6 could only carry special warheads

    Quote: Astra55
    It seems to me alone that we are slightly behind a potential partner in missile defense issues? It is ABM.

    Strategic? No. They have a strategic missile defense - 44 mines in Alaska and 4 in California. We deployed 100 interceptors in the Moscow missile defense zone. Now 51T6s have been removed and will be replaced with another long-range intercept missile, and the close one, as it was, remains. Where the US is superior is in missile defense for medium-range missiles.

    Quote: bayard
    And do not try to prove to me that a log of a synthetic warhead of American interceptor missiles is more effective.

    Still, kinetic interception with a kinetic interceptor is more effective in terms of hitting the BG as a result of a hit. The problem of targeting is, yes, more complicated, but it is one thing when an "armored" warhead falls into a field of fragments weighing 10-20 grams, it is quite another matter when it collides with an object weighing 30-60 kg. Kinetic intercept is more difficult than frag intercept, but more effective when hit

    Quote: tralflot1832
    Our people usually launched Poplar and shot down over Sara Shagan. The Amers did not like it very much, 2500 km from Kapustin Yar, or even less. But ours sent the USA with their Wishlist in the forest. Something like this.

    Andrew! Where did you get this nonsense? COMBAT EQUIPMENT for SLBMs and ICBMs is being tested on the Kapustin Yar - Sary-Shagan route. No "Topol" over Sary-Shagan got lost, because the rocket itself ceased to exist long before coming to Balkhash. And only combat equipment comes to Balkhash.
    And by the way, we are not launching Topol at Sary-Shagan, but a modified version of Topol-E designed exclusively for testing

    Quote: A resident of the Urals
    The start-up is fast, and then what - the main engines turn on? does she just disappear into smoke?

    It starts on sustainer engines. It just has such engines that they do not burn solid fuel, but it can be said to explode. It starts with tremendous acceleration.
    Therefore, it picks up speed of 4,5 km / s in just 3-5 seconds.

    Quote: Bersaglieri
    By the same type, the starting accelerator on the Zircon (this is to the question of some, "what kind of flash and why did it all disappear at once?") TTRD with ultrafast combustion and acceleration to 100g +

    The starting booster on the Zircon is the same standard as on the Onyx. During the work, and this is about 5 seconds, he manages to disperse that "Irkon" that "Onyx" to a speed of 2M. Then on the "Zircon" a sustainer solid-propellant engine is switched on, which accelerates it to a speed of about 4,8-4,9M, and on the "Onyx" a sustainer supersonic ramjet is switched on

    Quote: voyaka uh
    At Zircon, yes - first a booster (solid fuel accelerator) and, then, the CR engine is turned on.

    At "Zircon" first the starting engine is switched on, then the sustainer solid-propellant and only then - the sustainer ramjet hypersonic

    Quote: voyaka uh
    Many times faster.
    But the Pentagon has known about her for a long time. The rocket, in principle, is not new.
    There are options for it.
    Here's how it looks without a container:

    Alexey. You inserted pictures of a missile that was not tested at Sary-Shagan. The pictures show the 51T6 long-range intercept missile. Only the lowest possible new version 51T6