In Britain, the number of Russian nuclear submarines in the North Atlantic called "overwhelming"

58
In Britain, the number of Russian nuclear submarines in the North Atlantic called "overwhelming"

Britain drew attention to the increased number of Russian nuclear submarines operating in the North Atlantic, calling it "overwhelming." This is reported by the Daily Mail tabloid.

According to the newspaper, based on data provided by a source in the British Navy, Russia has dramatically increased the number of nuclear submarines operating in the North Atlantic, including off the coast of the United Kingdom. According to the military, Russian "stealth submarines" of the "Akula" class were seen off the coast of Great Britain.



The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering

- a source in the British Navy told the publication.

According to him, the situation with Russian submarines has become "serious", Russia is no longer limited to sending one submarine, instead sending two or three nuclear submarines to the North Atlantic.

Earlier, the US Navy also called the situation with Russian nuclear submarines in the Atlantic "serious". According to the Pentagon, Russia is currently deploying more submarines and for a longer time than before. At the same time, it is emphasized that with the entry into operation of several more new Russian nuclear submarines of the Borey-A and Yasen-M types, the situation may become critical.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    58 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +17
      27 October 2020 10: 36
      Again twenty-five))
      That is, they can dive near our shores and others, no, no ..
      1. Maz
        +26
        27 October 2020 10: 43
        Lord palmerston: ".... How hard it is to live when no one is at war with Russia!".....- and that says it all about Britain and there is nothing to add! Lord Palmerston is long gone - he died in 1865, and the attitude towards Russia has not changed since he inspired the start of the Crimean War of 1854.
        1. +8
          27 October 2020 10: 48
          They feel good and calm when they see our rusting boats at the bases.
          1. +14
            27 October 2020 10: 56
            At the same time, it is emphasized that with the entry into operation of several more new Russian nuclear submarines of the Borey-A and Yasen-M types, the situation may become critical.

            Intelligence from the British is useless. negative laughing
            Don't they read Skomorokhov? After all, he clearly and clearly says that
            we don't have any fleet. Everything is lost. wassat
            1. +24
              27 October 2020 11: 13
              Quote: Temples
              Intelligence from the British is useless.

              Their intelligence disagrees with you. Look what big-eyed and eared:
              spotted Russian "subtle submarines"
              1. +4
                27 October 2020 13: 55
                Quote: A Makarov
                Look what big-eyed

                It should be noted that Shark, according to their codification, is our Pike-B. And our Shark is a Project 941 SSBN and at least one - "Dmitry Donskoy", in service. Pike-B was armed with KR Grenade, which is the same Caliber ZM-14 without GLONASS laughing Therefore, not only threatens the Royal Navy, but also the rotten crown itself, or rather the megalopolises of the Kingdom laughing There are only three Schuk-B in combat condition at the Northern Fleet (three for modernization). Numb with three ... mmmm, Her Majesty's paranoia. Although, taking into account that the Northern Fleet is still "Obninsk" - Pike without B in service and titanium "Crab", "Nizhny" and "Pskov", then the Kingdom can be understood. Well, the Boreas, there is nothing to do there in the Atlantic ...
                1. +1
                  27 October 2020 16: 33
                  Our shark is a Project 941 SSBN and at least one is "Dmitry Donskoy", in service

                  And there is. Arkhangelsk and Severstal are awaiting disposal.
            2. 0
              29 October 2020 04: 15
              What is there? Our entire fleet is smaller than the Japanese. What's this? Fleet?
          2. 0
            27 October 2020 19: 39
            Well, leave them to calm down a few pieces and the rest (good) on duty
        2. 0
          27 October 2020 14: 00
          "Voivode Palmerston defeats Russia on the map with his index finger" (c) :)
      2. +3
        27 October 2020 11: 58
        what is the critical situation? Live peacefully and you will not be touched) can you think that we need apl to bomb london?
        1. 0
          27 October 2020 13: 19
          Quote: Clever man
          Live peacefully and you will not be touched)

          Not this way.
          Live peacefully, be devout Muslims Orthodox Christians, humble pride with spiritual braces, money earned by Jewish usury distribute to the poor and the poor donate to temples and monasteries.
          And then we will not touch.
      3. 0
        27 October 2020 12: 31
        Quote: nPuBaTuP
        That is, they can dive near our shores and others, no, no ..

        they didn't say "no, no")
        This is not the point. It's just that Borya Johnson cut the military budget by like 5%. Plus the reduction of positions in the army and navy (something was said there about 10 thousand). Apparently, this "source" threatens to be laid off, so it is sweeping a blizzard with horror stories) Although, the profile British press is whining for a year soon. Like, we bury our own fleet. Well, for example:
        How can the UK stop the Russians, using their growing submarine fleet, from airstrikes with long-range missiles or shutting down internet connections around the world by cutting submarine cables?

        Ian Ballantyne is editor of Warships International Fleet Review.
    2. +9
      27 October 2020 10: 37
      One, two, three, a lot!
      1. -1
        27 October 2020 11: 29
        Quote: iouris
        One, two, three, a lot!

        According to the newspaper, the Daily Mail tabloid. According to the military, Russian "stealth submarines" of the "Akula" class were spotted off the coast of Great Britain.

        The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering.

        To which the London newspaper "Finansial Tames": "That such hostile actions of hostile Russans will lead the British General Staff to an increase in patients with permanent enuresis, and the Royal Navy to increased purchases of diapers. And this will undermine the most humane budget, the most humane British Department of Defense."
        Here He is, Insidious, Ruthless, and Merciless PUTIN !!! The enemy of all the most tolerant and most civilized !!!
        wassat laughing tongue
    3. +1
      27 October 2020 10: 38
      And how do they even know about the quantity? Or do our nuclear submarines go there openly?
      1. -2
        27 October 2020 10: 46
        In recent years, they have rearmed all their anti-submarine aircraft, and the number of aircraft has not decreased, and the difference in the number of nuclear submarines between us and the USSR by an order of magnitude, that is, the capabilities have increased in order, hence the effectiveness of NATO and the US allies in the fight against our nuclear submarines. And it was clearly not only anti-submarine aircraft that were rearmed and modernized. As a result, the conditions for our submariners have become by the same order of magnitude more difficult than for the Soviet ones.
        Well, the accident (fire) at the deep-water station, the death of a large number of the most experienced officers of the GUGI, cannot but affect for the worse for us, because they, including the forcing of anti-submarine lines, provided.
        1. +4
          27 October 2020 11: 12
          Quote: Azimuth
          In recent years, they have re-equipped all of their anti-submarine aircraft.

          Rather not rearm, restored.
          Because until recently, British PLO aviation was on the verge of extinction: the Nimrod modernization program was canceled, ready-made aircraft were cut (3,6 billion pounds - "into the abyss"), and PLO aviation was deemed unnecessary due to the lack of targets.
          And only another horror story arr. 2014 "Russians are coming" rescued anti-submariners. True, the British had to sacrifice their own developments and transfer to the Poseidons.
          1. 0
            27 October 2020 13: 35
            Interestingly, the British still have naval aviation in the Air Force and are not subordinate to the Navy?
        2. +2
          27 October 2020 13: 37
          The difference between the USSR and the Russian Federation in the number of submarines is still several times, not orders of magnitude. By orders of magnitude, if less than ten times. This is not true. Even a difference of nine times is still a difference in times, not an order of magnitude.
          1. Aag
            -1
            27 October 2020 14: 21
            Quote: Sergej1972
            The difference between the USSR and the Russian Federation in the number of submarines is still several times, not orders of magnitude. By orders of magnitude, if less than ten times. This is not true. Even a difference of nine times is still a difference in times, not an order of magnitude.

            I will not argue, but please do not forget about everything that comes with it: minesweepers in BMZ, ships and aircraft of PLO, MA, and just about counter-torpedoes ... I would be glad if you convince me of the viability and competitiveness of the Russian Navy. hi
            1. 0
              27 October 2020 14: 29
              Yes, my comment concerns only the correct use of the expression "an order of magnitude more or less". Most commentators don't understand the difference between "many times" and "orders of magnitude" or "orders of magnitude".)
              1. Aag
                0
                28 October 2020 07: 32
                Quote: Sergej1972
                Yes, my comment concerns only the correct use of the expression "an order of magnitude more or less". Most commentators don't understand the difference between "many times" and "orders of magnitude" or "orders of magnitude".)

                I agree.
            2. 0
              27 October 2020 22: 03
              Quote: AAG
              I will be glad if you convince me of the solvency and competitiveness of the Russian Navy.

              The British did not worry in vain. At the SSBN base in Faslane Bay (Holy Loch) our RCS are constantly on duty, which determine the very moment of SSBN combat patrol, transmit the "fact" to the General Staff, from there to the tracking forces (PLA). But the new ones with AOKS or with the Ajax prefixes and Leksins' equipment of the Delta-PM1 type are already grazing the cow themselves without glowing. Apparently, there are leaks from the headquarters of the Federation Council or from somewhere else. And this is annoying in an adult way.
              I think so.
              1. Aag
                0
                28 October 2020 07: 35
                Quote: BoA KAA
                Quote: AAG
                I will be glad if you convince me of the solvency and competitiveness of the Russian Navy.

                The British did not worry in vain. At the SSBN base in Faslane Bay (Holy Loch) our RCS are constantly on duty, which determine the very moment of SSBN combat patrol, transmit the "fact" to the General Staff, from there to the tracking forces (PLA). But the new ones with AOKS or with the Ajax prefixes and Leksins' equipment of the Delta-PM1 type are already grazing the cow themselves without glowing. Apparently, there are leaks from the headquarters of the Federation Council or from somewhere else. And this is annoying in an adult way.
                I think so.

                Thank you. Type was reassured))).
      2. -1
        27 October 2020 11: 11
        Quote: Sheptun
        And how do they even know about the quantity?

        According to payment documents.
    4. +6
      27 October 2020 10: 42
      Well, how can we not ay-ay-ay ... When our nuclear submarines and Tu-160 were sawed for amerovskie money, the whole Western world applauded - what a good Russia ... And when it turned out that not everything was cut, and even something was built - immediately became scary and insidious ...
    5. +1
      27 October 2020 10: 43
      Britain is the master of the fields ... They don't even own the missiles on their submarines. And Russia - "Topol". So remember this more often, until you were fried with a crust for eternal rudeness.
      1. Aag
        +1
        27 October 2020 14: 59
        Quote: Cowbra
        Britain is the master of the fields ... They don't even own the missiles on their submarines. And Russia - "Topol". So remember this more often, until you were fried with a crust for eternal rudeness.

        I do not think that this will prevent them from applying NATO in the concept. This is one. And two, this is that for the Topol (including) it is necessary to develop, introduce additional PPs (flight missions, goals, if we talk about stationary ones) .A separate question about the number of BB, BZ (warheads, warheads). Yes, even about carriers!
        Another question ... (the question of the readiness of senior officials to issue an Order for the use of nuclear weapons, and any other forceful influence on the "West", we will leave it out of the brackets, -after the statements of Gref and others like him ..) RF, especially since information about the true state of the BG (combat readiness) of the Armed Forces is the subject of the State Secret ... But, what I see every day (how they park, how they drive, how they take children to kindergarten, etc., etc. .), - sorry, does not inspire confidence in (I will not write, - in the readiness to accurately and timely fulfill the order) the necessary power of our Armed Forces (armed forces).
        And this, without touching the VZU (higher management echelons), only touched on conversations, rumors ...
        No, not a vsepalschik! I want to believe! ... Who will "throw slippers" - please, argue, please. hi
        1. +1
          27 October 2020 16: 42
          Lord, the point is that Britain today - no one, after Brexit, even before it - it has ceased to be the Eurobank and the US overseer of Europe. The point is that they returned to where they started, they are not sailors, they never. What is the Speaker of the House of Lords sitting on? On a sack of wool - a sheep ... they were miserable initially! Their groans to the lords of Poplars are not audible and not even funny
          1. Aag
            0
            30 October 2020 20: 00
            Quote: Cowbra
            Lord, the point is that Britain today - no one, after Brexit, even before it - it has ceased to be the Eurobank and the US overseer of Europe. The point is that they returned to where they started, they are not sailors, they never. What is the Speaker of the House of Lords sitting on? On a sack of wool - a sheep ... they were miserable initially! Their groans to the lords of Poplars are not audible and not even funny

            I would like to agree with you ... But! ... Please take the trouble to look into open sources with the question of ownership, board of directors, shareholdings, etc., of energy companies, or, more simply, the entire cascade of hydroelectric power plants along the river ... Angara, and further down to the ocean ... Greetings from Deripaska! Whom the whole country saved, even those who were neither dream nor spirit about it ...
            About the "lords" of "Topol" ... Whom do you mean? Until the 99th, September, com. GPP (preparation and launch groups) of the same PGRK MBR. Not "lord", - he is not able to compromise the order to launch on the target. Not to execute, with various excuses, - easy (the consequences are difficult to predict). Maybe he chatted too much, - no! -Let the relevant authorities think about the stability of management, personnel, and their ideological education! More than 20 years have passed since my dismissal from active service, (respectively, subscriptions, restrictions ...) But even now I do not consider it possible to write the real state of affairs. ( Fortunately, not only because everything is sad, there are surprises for the adversaries) But, once again, BUT, if the Russian Federation (due to, or rather, not the power, other components of the confrontation) is forced to appeal to the arguments of the general public, - which, in turn, can provide only one component of the Strategic Missile Forces (Strategic Missile Forces) (I will repeat myself, the VKS, the Navy in their current state are not capable of this. Apparently, in the understanding of the current leadership, they have other tasks: intimidation in individual theaters ", extrapolated x economic tasks ... Guys of the Navy and the Aerospace Forces! No offense! Agree, the duty of an officer (in my understanding) has always been in the execution of the Order. And who, when, what orders gave (voiced, published, - should we not know, - it happened ...)
            I am ready to listen to alternative opinions ... hi
    6. +4
      27 October 2020 10: 47
      I would also think about returning Arkhangelsk and Severstal to service with the Liner SLBM.
      1. +2
        27 October 2020 13: 24
        Quote: Tektor
        I would also think about returning to service Arkhangelsk and Severstal with SLBM Liner

        there, at the top, they already thought and decided that these boats were not needed for the Navy ((, it's a pity, the idea of ​​adapting to the calibers was normal
    7. +2
      27 October 2020 10: 57
      I wonder when the Chelyabinsk boat will be returned to service? I understand that this is the Pacific Fleet, but nevertheless ... I hope it was not cut.
    8. -4
      27 October 2020 11: 02
      Is this "Shark" then - little noticeable? Well, in principle, taking into account the fact that only one TK-208 remained on the move
      "Dmitry Donskoy" and that is used for testing "Bulava", but definitely not off the coast of shallow Britain, then yes, it is very difficult to notice it there. And do not care that the largest submarine in the world.
      1. +6
        27 October 2020 11: 10
        Most likely, according to Akula, they mean project 971 Pike-B (NATO class AKULA)
        1. +1
          27 October 2020 11: 18
          Thank you for the clarification, I forgot about the habit of the Naglo-Saxons to rename everything ...
    9. +3
      27 October 2020 11: 04
      the situation can become critical.
      The critical days began.
      1. +1
        27 October 2020 13: 27
        Quote: Dubox
        The critical days began.


        yes no, they have begun critical decades))
    10. 0
      27 October 2020 11: 09
      reports the Daily Mail tabloid.


      You can not read further.
    11. +2
      27 October 2020 11: 11
      Buuuu! Right now, another one has been completed and give up.
    12. 0
      27 October 2020 11: 21
      The small-shavens are worried that they will not be invited to the new Yalta. Deal with the Skripals, migrants and your drunken divers.
    13. +9
      27 October 2020 11: 22
      The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering

      Translated from the navy, this means: give us more money. smile

      I have suggested for a long time not to let things take their course and start making money on the "Russian threat".
      Do you want to increase the military budget, but parliament does not want "waste"? Contact the Russian Threat LLC! Only 10% of the increase in the budget - and Russian "bears" will fly around your borders, and Russian submarines will graze on your shores.
      "Russian threat" - has been working since the days of Ivan the Terrible!
      1. +3
        27 October 2020 11: 42
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Do you want to increase the military budget, but parliament does not want "waste"? Contact the Russian Threat LLC!

        ))
        not bad.
        Is there a budget option?
        Like ...
    14. +4
      27 October 2020 11: 25
      Somehow they are easily overwhelmed. There are only one, two boats and not enough boats ...
    15. +1
      27 October 2020 11: 31
      The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering
      A British Navy source told the tabloid in confidence. Did this "source" really think that the Russian Armed Forces and Navy were at the level of the late 90s and was stunned when he found out that this was not so? All of them perfectly know and understand the main thing that it is better not to fight with Russia ourselves, and it is difficult to find fools for this. Therefore, it remains not to shout, but to yell about the Russian threat, to impose sanctions with the "allies" for everything and hope that it will resolve itself.
    16. 0
      27 October 2020 11: 40
      Well, it's nice, the islanders will complain. good I am a Russian and I am not satisfied with only one thing, I need more boats, within reasonable limits of course, but more.
      1. 0
        27 October 2020 12: 06
        The island nation has violently responded to the increase in Russian deployed nuclear submarines in the North Atlantic. cons under my comment. winked Oh well . wassat
    17. +2
      27 October 2020 11: 45
      And what are they afraid of? We never came to them with the war, but they - yes.
      1. 0
        27 October 2020 22: 19
        So the cat smells whose meat it has eaten! laughing hi
    18. 0
      27 October 2020 12: 22
      The British would like the Russian Federation to go to the Atlantic across the Pacific Ocean. But the British wishlist is not the same.
    19. 0
      27 October 2020 12: 28
      Put a dozen imitators on each boat. Here the fun can begin
    20. +1
      27 October 2020 13: 04
      instead, sending two or three nuclear submarines to the North Atlantic
      The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering
      Does 2-3 boats overwhelm them? you need to whip up hysterics but there is nothing, so we will be hysterical over what we have
    21. -1
      27 October 2020 15: 40
      here she is really a womb, they are afraid of our nuclear submarines! but they are not afraid of any unnecessary aircraft carrier and surface cruisers, because they are outdated for a long time and do not have combat missions in the conditions of the Russian Federation, except for replacing a simple PLO frigate in BMZ with somewhat more powerful self-defense
      1. +1
        27 October 2020 16: 54
        No one is afraid of anyone. It's just that the Navy traditionally wants more money for itself.
    22. 0
      27 October 2020 16: 33
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Quote: Azimuth
      In recent years, they have re-equipped all of their anti-submarine aircraft.

      Rather not rearm, restored.
      Because until recently, British PLO aviation was on the verge of extinction: the Nimrod modernization program was canceled, ready-made aircraft were cut (3,6 billion pounds - "into the abyss"), and PLO aviation was deemed unnecessary due to the lack of targets.
      And only another horror story arr. 2014 "Russians are coming" rescued anti-submariners. True, the British had to sacrifice their own developments and transfer to the Poseidons.
      Yes. I read about this, a typical story for Western countries, each weapon or weapons program, the more expensive, is examined there under a magnifying glass and comprehensively. But from the result of this process in Britain, it is not easier for us, the fact is that anti-submarine aircraft are re-equipped with modern anti-submarine aircraft and so practically all over the world, just the number of Poseidons supplied is "staggering", and not a couple of our nuclear submarines in the Atlantic.
    23. 0
      28 October 2020 12: 26
      Let the aircraft carrier be built in spite of themselves, there is nothing to do with money ...
    24. Aag
      0
      30 October 2020 20: 14
      Quote: Alexey RA
      The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering

      Translated from the navy, this means: give us more money. smile

      I have suggested for a long time not to let things take their course and start making money on the "Russian threat".
      Do you want to increase the military budget, but parliament does not want "waste"? Contact the Russian Threat LLC! Only 10% of the increase in the budget - and Russian "bears" will fly around your borders, and Russian submarines will graze on your shores.
      "Russian threat" - has been working since the days of Ivan the Terrible!

      No matter how criticized you by individual commentators (sometimes, IMHO: -deservedly), your opinion is weighty and authoritative, IMHO. hi

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"