Military Review

In Britain, the number of Russian nuclear submarines in the North Atlantic called "overwhelming"

58
In Britain, the number of Russian nuclear submarines in the North Atlantic called "overwhelming"

Britain drew attention to the increased number of Russian nuclear submarines operating in the North Atlantic, calling it "overwhelming." This is reported by the Daily Mail tabloid.


According to the newspaper, based on data provided by a source in the British Navy, Russia has dramatically increased the number of nuclear submarines operating in the North Atlantic, including off the coast of the United Kingdom. According to the military, Russian "stealth submarines" of the "Akula" class were seen off the coast of Great Britain.

The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering

- a source in the British Navy told the publication.

According to him, the situation with Russian submarines has become "serious", Russia is no longer limited to sending one submarine, instead sending two or three nuclear submarines to the North Atlantic.

Earlier, the US Navy also called the situation with Russian nuclear submarines in the Atlantic "serious". According to the Pentagon, Russia is currently deploying more submarines and for a longer time than before. At the same time, it is emphasized that with the entry into operation of several more new Russian nuclear submarines of the Borey-A and Yasen-M types, the situation may become critical.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. nPuBaTuP
    nPuBaTuP 27 October 2020 10: 36 New
    17
    Again twenty-five))
    That is, they can dive near our shores and others, no, no ..
    1. Maz
      Maz 27 October 2020 10: 43 New
      26
      Lord palmerston: ".... How hard it is to live when no one is at war with Russia!".....- and that says it all about Britain and there is nothing to add! Lord Palmerston is long gone - he died in 1865, and the attitude towards Russia has not changed since he inspired the start of the Crimean War of 1854.
      1. figwam
        figwam 27 October 2020 10: 48 New
        +8
        They feel good and calm when they see our rusting boats at the bases.
        1. Temples
          Temples 27 October 2020 10: 56 New
          14
          At the same time, it is emphasized that with the entry into operation of several more new Russian nuclear submarines of the Borey-A and Yasen-M types, the situation may become critical.

          Intelligence from the British is useless. negative laughing
          Don't they read Skomorokhov? After all, he clearly and clearly says that
          we don't have any fleet. Everything is lost. wassat
          1. And Makarov
            And Makarov 27 October 2020 11: 13 New
            24
            Quote: Temples
            Intelligence from the British is useless.

            Their intelligence disagrees with you. Look what big-eyed and eared:
            spotted Russian "subtle submarines"
            1. hrych
              hrych 27 October 2020 13: 55 New
              +4
              Quote: A Makarov
              Look what big-eyed

              It should be noted that Shark, according to their codification, is our Pike-B. And our Shark is a Project 941 SSBN and at least one - "Dmitry Donskoy", in service. Pike-B was armed with KR Grenade, which is the same Caliber ZM-14 without GLONASS laughing Therefore, not only threatens the Royal Navy, but also the rotten crown itself, or rather the megalopolises of the Kingdom laughing There are only three Schuk-B in combat condition at the Northern Fleet (three for modernization). Numb with three ... mmmm, Her Majesty's paranoia. Although, taking into account that the Northern Fleet is still "Obninsk" - Pike without B in service and titanium "Crab", "Nizhny" and "Pskov", then the Kingdom can be understood. Well, the Boreas, there is nothing to do there in the Atlantic ...
              1. Crash
                Crash 27 October 2020 16: 33 New
                +1
                Our shark is a Project 941 SSBN and at least one is "Dmitry Donskoy", in service

                And there is. Arkhangelsk and Severstal are awaiting disposal.
          2. Crabong
            Crabong 29 October 2020 04: 15 New
            0
            What is there? Our entire fleet is smaller than the Japanese. What's this? Fleet?
        2. seregatara1969
          seregatara1969 27 October 2020 19: 39 New
          0
          Well, leave them to calm down a few pieces and the rest (good) on duty
      2. Bersaglieri
        Bersaglieri 27 October 2020 14: 00 New
        0
        "Voivode Palmerston defeats Russia on the map with his index finger" (c) :)
    2. smart ass
      smart ass 27 October 2020 11: 58 New
      +3
      what is the critical situation? Live peacefully and you will not be touched) can you think that we need apl to bomb london?
      1. Narak-zempo
        Narak-zempo 27 October 2020 13: 19 New
        0
        Quote: Clever man
        Live peacefully and you will not be touched)

        Not this way.
        Live peacefully, be devout Muslims Orthodox Christians, humble pride with spiritual braces, money earned by Jewish usury distribute to the poor and the poor donate to temples and monasteries.
        And then we will not touch.
    3. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
      Paragraph Epitafievich Y. 27 October 2020 12: 31 New
      0
      Quote: nPuBaTuP
      That is, they can dive near our shores and others, no, no ..

      they didn't say "no, no")
      This is not the point. It's just that Borya Johnson cut the military budget by like 5%. Plus the reduction of positions in the army and navy (something was said there about 10 thousand). Apparently, this "source" threatens to be laid off, so it is sweeping a blizzard with horror stories) Although, the profile British press is whining for a year soon. Like, we bury our own fleet. Well, for example:
      How can the UK stop the Russians, using their growing submarine fleet, from airstrikes with long-range missiles or shutting down internet connections around the world by cutting submarine cables?

      Ian Ballantyne is editor of Warships International Fleet Review.
  2. iouris
    iouris 27 October 2020 10: 37 New
    +9
    One, two, three, a lot!
    1. Evdokim
      Evdokim 27 October 2020 11: 29 New
      -1
      Quote: iouris
      One, two, three, a lot!

      According to the newspaper, the Daily Mail tabloid. According to the military, Russian "stealth submarines" of the "Akula" class were spotted off the coast of Great Britain.

      The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering.

      To which the London newspaper "Finansial Tames": "That such hostile actions of hostile Russans will lead the British General Staff to an increase in patients with permanent enuresis, and the Royal Navy to increased purchases of diapers. And this will undermine the most humane budget, the most humane British Department of Defense."
      Here He is, Insidious, Ruthless, and Merciless PUTIN !!! The enemy of all the most tolerant and most civilized !!!
      wassat laughing tongue
  3. Whisper
    Whisper 27 October 2020 10: 38 New
    +1
    And how do they even know about the quantity? Or do our nuclear submarines go there openly?
    1. Azimuth
      Azimuth 27 October 2020 10: 46 New
      -2
      In recent years, they have rearmed all their anti-submarine aircraft, and the number of aircraft has not decreased, and the difference in the number of nuclear submarines between us and the USSR by an order of magnitude, that is, the capabilities have increased in order, hence the effectiveness of NATO and the US allies in the fight against our nuclear submarines. And it was clearly not only anti-submarine aircraft that were rearmed and modernized. As a result, the conditions for our submariners have become by the same order of magnitude more difficult than for the Soviet ones.
      Well, the accident (fire) at the deep-water station, the death of a large number of the most experienced officers of the GUGI, cannot but affect for the worse for us, because they, including the forcing of anti-submarine lines, provided.
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 27 October 2020 11: 12 New
        +4
        Quote: Azimuth
        In recent years, they have re-equipped all of their anti-submarine aircraft.

        Rather not rearm, restored.
        Because until recently, British PLO aviation was on the verge of extinction: the Nimrod modernization program was canceled, ready-made aircraft were cut (3,6 billion pounds - "into the abyss"), and PLO aviation was deemed unnecessary due to the lack of targets.
        And only another horror story arr. 2014 "Russians are coming" rescued anti-submariners. True, the British had to sacrifice their own developments and transfer to the Poseidons.
        1. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 27 October 2020 13: 35 New
          0
          Interestingly, the British still have naval aviation in the Air Force and are not subordinate to the Navy?
      2. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 27 October 2020 13: 37 New
        +2
        The difference between the USSR and the Russian Federation in the number of submarines is still several times, not orders of magnitude. By orders of magnitude, if less than ten times. This is not true. Even a difference of nine times is still a difference in times, not an order of magnitude.
        1. Aag
          Aag 27 October 2020 14: 21 New
          -1
          Quote: Sergej1972
          The difference between the USSR and the Russian Federation in the number of submarines is still several times, not orders of magnitude. By orders of magnitude, if less than ten times. This is not true. Even a difference of nine times is still a difference in times, not an order of magnitude.

          I will not argue, but please do not forget about everything that comes with it: minesweepers in BMZ, ships and aircraft of PLO, MA, and just about counter-torpedoes ... I would be glad if you convince me of the viability and competitiveness of the Russian Navy. hi
          1. Sergej1972
            Sergej1972 27 October 2020 14: 29 New
            0
            Yes, my comment concerns only the correct use of the expression "an order of magnitude more or less". Most commentators don't understand the difference between "many times" and "orders of magnitude" or "orders of magnitude".)
            1. Aag
              Aag 28 October 2020 07: 32 New
              0
              Quote: Sergej1972
              Yes, my comment concerns only the correct use of the expression "an order of magnitude more or less". Most commentators don't understand the difference between "many times" and "orders of magnitude" or "orders of magnitude".)

              I agree.
          2. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 27 October 2020 22: 03 New
            0
            Quote: AAG
            I will be glad if you convince me of the solvency and competitiveness of the Russian Navy.

            The British did not worry in vain. At the SSBN base in Faslane Bay (Holy Loch) our RCS are constantly on duty, which determine the very moment of SSBN combat patrol, transmit the "fact" to the General Staff, from there to the tracking forces (PLA). But the new ones with AOKS or with the Ajax prefixes and Leksins' equipment of the Delta-PM1 type are already grazing the cow themselves without glowing. Apparently, there are leaks from the headquarters of the Federation Council or from somewhere else. And this is annoying in an adult way.
            I think so.
            1. Aag
              Aag 28 October 2020 07: 35 New
              0
              Quote: BoA KAA
              Quote: AAG
              I will be glad if you convince me of the solvency and competitiveness of the Russian Navy.

              The British did not worry in vain. At the SSBN base in Faslane Bay (Holy Loch) our RCS are constantly on duty, which determine the very moment of SSBN combat patrol, transmit the "fact" to the General Staff, from there to the tracking forces (PLA). But the new ones with AOKS or with the Ajax prefixes and Leksins' equipment of the Delta-PM1 type are already grazing the cow themselves without glowing. Apparently, there are leaks from the headquarters of the Federation Council or from somewhere else. And this is annoying in an adult way.
              I think so.

              Thank you. Type was reassured))).
    2. iouris
      iouris 27 October 2020 11: 11 New
      -1
      Quote: Sheptun
      And how do they even know about the quantity?

      According to payment documents.
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 27 October 2020 10: 42 New
    +6
    Well, how can we not ay-ay-ay ... When our nuclear submarines and Tu-160 were sawed for amerovskie money, the whole Western world applauded - what a good Russia ... And when it turned out that not everything was cut, and even something was built - immediately became scary and insidious ...
  5. Cowbra
    Cowbra 27 October 2020 10: 43 New
    +1
    Britain is the master of the fields ... They don't even own the missiles on their submarines. And Russia - "Topol". So remember this more often, until you were fried with a crust for eternal rudeness.
    1. Aag
      Aag 27 October 2020 14: 59 New
      +1
      Quote: Cowbra
      Britain is the master of the fields ... They don't even own the missiles on their submarines. And Russia - "Topol". So remember this more often, until you were fried with a crust for eternal rudeness.

      I do not think that this will prevent them from applying NATO in the concept. This is one. And two, this is that for the Topol (including) it is necessary to develop, introduce additional PPs (flight missions, goals, if we talk about stationary ones) .A separate question about the number of BB, BZ (warheads, warheads). Yes, even about carriers!
      Another question ... (the question of the readiness of senior officials to issue an Order for the use of nuclear weapons, and any other forceful influence on the "West", we will leave it out of the brackets, -after the statements of Gref and others like him ..) RF, especially since information about the true state of the BG (combat readiness) of the Armed Forces is the subject of the State Secret ... But, what I see every day (how they park, how they drive, how they take children to kindergarten, etc., etc. .), - sorry, does not inspire confidence in (I will not write, - in the readiness to accurately and timely fulfill the order) the necessary power of our Armed Forces (armed forces).
      And this, without touching the VZU (higher management echelons), only touched on conversations, rumors ...
      No, not a vsepalschik! I want to believe! ... Who will "throw slippers" - please, argue, please. hi
      1. Cowbra
        Cowbra 27 October 2020 16: 42 New
        +1
        Lord, the point is that Britain today - no one, after Brexit, even before it - it has ceased to be the Eurobank and the US overseer of Europe. The point is that they returned to where they started, they are not sailors, they never. What is the Speaker of the House of Lords sitting on? On a sack of wool - a sheep ... they were miserable initially! Their groans to the lords of Poplars are not audible and not even funny
        1. Aag
          Aag 30 October 2020 20: 00 New
          0
          Quote: Cowbra
          Lord, the point is that Britain today - no one, after Brexit, even before it - it has ceased to be the Eurobank and the US overseer of Europe. The point is that they returned to where they started, they are not sailors, they never. What is the Speaker of the House of Lords sitting on? On a sack of wool - a sheep ... they were miserable initially! Their groans to the lords of Poplars are not audible and not even funny

          I would like to agree with you ... But! ... Please take the trouble to look into open sources with the question of ownership, board of directors, shareholdings, etc., of energy companies, or, more simply, the entire cascade of hydroelectric power plants along the river ... Angara, and further down to the ocean ... Greetings from Deripaska! Whom the whole country saved, even those who were neither dream nor spirit about it ...
          About the "lords" of "Topol" ... Whom do you mean? Until the 99th, September, com. GPP (preparation and launch groups) of the same PGRK MBR. Not "lord", - he is not able to compromise the order to launch on the target. Not to execute, with various excuses, - easy (the consequences are difficult to predict). Maybe he chatted too much, - no! -Let the relevant authorities think about the stability of management, personnel, and their ideological education! More than 20 years have passed since my dismissal from active service, (respectively, subscriptions, restrictions ...) But even now I do not consider it possible to write the real state of affairs. ( Fortunately, not only because everything is sad, there are surprises for the adversaries) But, once again, BUT, if the Russian Federation (due to, or rather, not the power, other components of the confrontation) is forced to appeal to the arguments of the general public, - which, in turn, can provide only one component of the Strategic Missile Forces (Strategic Missile Forces) (I will repeat myself, the VKS, the Navy in their current state are not capable of this. Apparently, in the understanding of the current leadership, they have other tasks: intimidation in individual theaters ", extrapolated x economic tasks ... Guys of the Navy and the Aerospace Forces! No offense! Agree, the duty of an officer (in my understanding) has always been in the execution of the Order. And who, when, what orders gave (voiced, published, - should we not know, - it happened ...)
          I am ready to listen to alternative opinions ... hi
  6. Tektor
    Tektor 27 October 2020 10: 47 New
    +4
    I would also think about returning Arkhangelsk and Severstal to service with the Liner SLBM.
    1. Sandor Clegane
      Sandor Clegane 27 October 2020 13: 24 New
      +2
      Quote: Tektor
      I would also think about returning to service Arkhangelsk and Severstal with SLBM Liner

      there, at the top, they already thought and decided that these boats were not needed for the Navy ((, it's a pity, the idea of ​​adapting to the calibers was normal
  7. Kapkan
    Kapkan 27 October 2020 10: 57 New
    +2
    I wonder when the Chelyabinsk boat will be returned to service? I understand that this is the Pacific Fleet, but nevertheless ... I hope it was not cut.
  8. Garm
    Garm 27 October 2020 11: 02 New
    -4
    Is this "Shark" then - little noticeable? Well, in principle, taking into account the fact that only one TK-208 remained on the move
    "Dmitry Donskoy" and that is used for testing "Bulava", but definitely not off the coast of shallow Britain, then yes, it is very difficult to notice it there. And do not care that the largest submarine in the world.
    1. Charik
      Charik 27 October 2020 11: 10 New
      +6
      Most likely, according to Akula, they mean project 971 Pike-B (NATO class AKULA)
      1. Garm
        Garm 27 October 2020 11: 18 New
        +1
        Thank you for the clarification, I forgot about the habit of the Naglo-Saxons to rename everything ...
  9. Dubox
    Dubox 27 October 2020 11: 04 New
    +3
    the situation can become critical.
    The critical days began.
    1. Sandor Clegane
      Sandor Clegane 27 October 2020 13: 27 New
      +1
      Quote: Dubox
      The critical days began.


      yes no, they have begun critical decades))
  10. The eye of the crying
    The eye of the crying 27 October 2020 11: 09 New
    0
    reports the Daily Mail tabloid.


    You can not read further.
  11. sleeve
    sleeve 27 October 2020 11: 11 New
    +2
    Buuuu! Right now, another one has been completed and give up.
  12. Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 27 October 2020 11: 21 New
    0
    The small-shavens are worried that they will not be invited to the new Yalta. Deal with the Skripals, migrants and your drunken divers.
  13. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 27 October 2020 11: 22 New
    +9
    The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering

    Translated from the navy, this means: give us more money. smile

    I have suggested for a long time not to let things take their course and start making money on the "Russian threat".
    Do you want to increase the military budget, but parliament does not want "waste"? Contact the Russian Threat LLC! Only 10% of the increase in the budget - and Russian "bears" will fly around your borders, and Russian submarines will graze on your shores.
    "Russian threat" - has been working since the days of Ivan the Terrible!
    1. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
      Paragraph Epitafievich Y. 27 October 2020 11: 42 New
      +3
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Do you want to increase the military budget, but parliament does not want "waste"? Contact the Russian Threat LLC!

      ))
      not bad.
      Is there a budget option?
      Like ...
  14. jovanni
    jovanni 27 October 2020 11: 25 New
    +4
    Somehow they are easily overwhelmed. There are only one, two boats and not enough boats ...
  15. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 27 October 2020 11: 31 New
    +1
    The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering
    A British Navy source told the tabloid in confidence. Did this "source" really think that the Russian Armed Forces and Navy were at the level of the late 90s and was stunned when he found out that this was not so? All of them perfectly know and understand the main thing that it is better not to fight with Russia ourselves, and it is difficult to find fools for this. Therefore, it remains not to shout, but to yell about the Russian threat, to impose sanctions with the "allies" for everything and hope that it will resolve itself.
  16. AVA77
    AVA77 27 October 2020 11: 40 New
    0
    Well, it's nice, the islanders will complain. good I am a Russian and I am not satisfied with only one thing, I need more boats, within reasonable limits of course, but more.
    1. AVA77
      AVA77 27 October 2020 12: 06 New
      0
      The island nation has violently responded to the increase in Russian deployed nuclear submarines in the North Atlantic. cons under my comment. winked Oh well . wassat
  17. Jarilo
    Jarilo 27 October 2020 11: 45 New
    +2
    And what are they afraid of? We never came to them with the war, but they - yes.
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 27 October 2020 22: 19 New
      0
      So the cat smells whose meat it has eaten! laughing hi
  18. da Vinci
    da Vinci 27 October 2020 12: 22 New
    0
    The British would like the Russian Federation to go to the Atlantic across the Pacific Ocean. But the British wishlist is not the same.
  19. APASUS
    APASUS 27 October 2020 12: 28 New
    0
    Put a dozen imitators on each boat. Here the fun can begin
  20. _Ugene_
    _Ugene_ 27 October 2020 13: 04 New
    +1
    instead, sending two or three nuclear submarines to the North Atlantic
    The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering
    Does 2-3 boats overwhelm them? you need to whip up hysterics but there is nothing, so we will be hysterical over what we have
  21. Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 27 October 2020 15: 40 New
    -1
    here she is really a womb, they are afraid of our nuclear submarines! but they are not afraid of any unnecessary aircraft carrier and surface cruisers, because they are outdated for a long time and do not have combat missions in the conditions of the Russian Federation, except for replacing a simple PLO frigate in BMZ with somewhat more powerful self-defense
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 27 October 2020 16: 54 New
      +1
      No one is afraid of anyone. It's just that the Navy traditionally wants more money for itself.
  22. Azimuth
    Azimuth 27 October 2020 16: 33 New
    0
    Quote: Alexey RA
    Quote: Azimuth
    In recent years, they have re-equipped all of their anti-submarine aircraft.

    Rather not rearm, restored.
    Because until recently, British PLO aviation was on the verge of extinction: the Nimrod modernization program was canceled, ready-made aircraft were cut (3,6 billion pounds - "into the abyss"), and PLO aviation was deemed unnecessary due to the lack of targets.
    And only another horror story arr. 2014 "Russians are coming" rescued anti-submariners. True, the British had to sacrifice their own developments and transfer to the Poseidons.
    Yes. I read about this, a typical story for Western countries, each weapon or weapons program, the more expensive, is examined there under a magnifying glass and comprehensively. But from the result of this process in Britain, it is not easier for us, the fact is that anti-submarine aircraft are re-equipped with modern anti-submarine aircraft and so practically all over the world, just the number of Poseidons supplied is "staggering", and not a couple of our nuclear submarines in the Atlantic.
  23. Alien From
    Alien From 28 October 2020 12: 26 New
    0
    Let the aircraft carrier be built in spite of themselves, there is nothing to do with money ...
  24. Aag
    Aag 30 October 2020 20: 14 New
    0
    Quote: Alexey RA
    The number of Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic is staggering

    Translated from the navy, this means: give us more money. smile

    I have suggested for a long time not to let things take their course and start making money on the "Russian threat".
    Do you want to increase the military budget, but parliament does not want "waste"? Contact the Russian Threat LLC! Only 10% of the increase in the budget - and Russian "bears" will fly around your borders, and Russian submarines will graze on your shores.
    "Russian threat" - has been working since the days of Ivan the Terrible!

    No matter how criticized you by individual commentators (sometimes, IMHO: -deservedly), your opinion is weighty and authoritative, IMHO. hi