Iran warns the parties to the conflict in Karabakh about the inadmissibility of violating its borders

74
Iran warns the parties to the conflict in Karabakh about the inadmissibility of violating its borders

Iran will not tolerate aggression on its borders against the background of hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh. This was stated by the Iranian Ambassador to Russia Kazem Jalali.

Tehran is closely following the situation in Karabakh, the ambassador noted. Iran considers aggression on the part of any participant in an armed conflict unacceptable. At the same time, he specified that the Iranian leadership is in contact with both Azerbaijan and Armenia.



The activity in the border regions of our country is seriously and closely monitored by the Islamic Republic of Iran, and in this regard, declaring the aggression of any of the conflicting parties in the region on the territory of our country unacceptable, we seriously warn them about the necessary precautions

- Jalali said, adding that both Baku and Yerevan were warned about the consequences.

And if we feel the need, then the necessary measures will definitely be taken

- he summed up.

Earlier it was reported that a downed drone fell on the territory of Iran, and eight shells flew into the territory of Iran from the zone of military conflict, damaging a residential building.

For our part, we note that Iran is in favor of a peaceful settlement of the conflict. The likelihood that in the event of any incidents on the Iranian border, Tehran will decide to get involved in hostilities on the side of one of the participants in the conflict is negligible. Back in late September, the Iranian leadership announced that Tehran was ready to provide mediation services for negotiations between Baku and Yerevan.

Despite the fact that Iran has excellent relations with Armenia and not very good with Azerbaijan, Tehran will not side with Yerevan. This is mainly due to the personality of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who holds a pro-American position, and, as you know, the United States is enemy No. 1 for Iran.

However, despite the statements, Iran launched a large-scale military exercise on October 21, code-named Defender of the Skies-99, during which it deployed air defense systems and surveillance equipment. According to experts, the exercises are directly related to the operational situation on the border with Azerbaijan, Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    74 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +3
      23 October 2020 11: 20
      Iran's concern is understandable. No one needs a military conflict, especially near their borders.
      1. 0
        23 October 2020 12: 54
        And if Turkey also intervenes directly by introducing military units.
        Will Iran want to secure a buffer zone for itself?
        1. NTD
          -1
          23 October 2020 13: 16
          Quote: Livonetc
          Will Iran want to secure a buffer zone for itself?

          The consequences after that
          Will Iran be able to ensure its security?
          1. -2
            23 October 2020 13: 24
            Do you mean Turkey's entry into active hostilities against Iran?
            Definitely can.
            True, this will be a painful military conflict without an unambiguous favorite and winner.
            Iran is no stranger.
            The strengths and capabilities are approximately equal.
            Here the question is who and what will be decided.
            Iran is firmly pointing out to Turkey that it is unacceptable for troops to enter the region directly.
            Turkey will most likely not cross this line.
            And Iran, in turn, will not intervene without Turkey's entry, directly by troops, into the region.
            1. -3
              23 October 2020 13: 34
              Somewhere there was already information that the Persians had already fired at the positions of the Azerbaijanis. And that Baku, troops are already being removed from NKAO and transferred to the south. True, there is no confirmation yet. In general, this is a very convenient situation for Iran to close the topic Zap. and Vost. Azerbaijan for 20-30 years.
              1. 0
                23 October 2020 17: 33
                1. Azerbaijanis make up one third of the population of Iran, they do not like Persians. Yes, the Persians secretly supported the Armenians politically, and this is understandable; but in this conflict Iran is increasingly supporting Azerbaijan, because otherwise they can get a serious rebellion in their country. They already received a mini riot in the early days of the war, when they set fire to trucks with cargo for Armenia.
                2. We have been diplomatically preparing for the neutralization of Iran for a long time - hence the agreement signed for several more years on the construction of the Khudaferin hydroelectric complex, which we occupied just a couple of days ago.
                The Russia-Iran-Turkey-Azerbaijan-Georgia axis has a lot of opportunities for the largest and most profitable projects; and Armenia hinders them and, moreover, claims the lands of all the listed neighbors, except for Russia, but this is still. There are already articles about the great maritime power Armenia in the 10th century in the Crimea. So all the players merged Armenia.
                1. +1
                  23 October 2020 17: 47
                  In Ukraine, too, many did not want to go to Donbass to kill fellow countrymen. But the article in the Criminal Code is a very convincing piece. Did you build a hydroelectric complex on a territory that has not been yours for 30 years?))) I have not read such ridiculous statements for a long time. Armenia has not yet been "merged" by Moscow and "will not merge", moreover, they are interested in further dragging out the conflict. The more Armenia and Azerbaijan exhaust each other now, the more obedient they will be later. Again, the more equipment is burned now, the more will then have to buy from Moscow.
                  1. 0
                    23 October 2020 22: 27
                    Adequate and dignified position.
                    "We do not interfere in someone else's conflict, we try to maintain relations with both sides, but we will not tolerate interference in our own affairs."
            2. NTD
              -1
              23 October 2020 15: 42
              Quote: Livonetc
              Do you mean Turkey's entry into active hostilities against Iran?

              Turkey will be one of several countries.

              Quote: Livonetc
              True, this will be a painful military conflict without an unambiguous favorite and winner.

              Ohh I wouldn't think so. The gender of their army is Turki. Do not forget. Further, apart from Turkey, there will be at least a part of NATO. "Iran has many friends"

              Quote: Livonetc
              The strengths and capabilities are approximately equal.

              I do not think so. This will not be a war between Iraq and Iran, but it will be a big war and I very much doubt that anyone will help them.

              Quote: Livonetc
              Here the question is who and what will be decided.

              I totally disagree. Everything has its time! Everything must be done not only wisely, but also in time. The question of Iran, a matter of time.

              Quote: Livonetc
              Turkey will most likely not cross this line.

              If Erdogan is still in power, then do not hesitate! Moreover, they will not be alone.

              Quote: Livonetc
              And Iran, in turn, will not intervene without Turkey's entry, directly by troops, into the region.

              Sorry, but this is nonsense. They are like jackals, only from the side can they watch the fight of lions. You overestimate the Iranian Armed Forces too much. The only thing that Azerbaijan will have to do is to buy S-400 and more Tors and Buk-s, and the Sling of David and Heche will not interfere, and then you can buy pop food and watch the show from the front rows. The skies of Azerbaijan will be protected by the best facilities of Russia and Israel. This is a thing. In principle, now also.
              1. +1
                23 October 2020 17: 50
                Will NATO support Turkey?))) After Erdogan openly spoke rudely about Trump and Macron, and generally behaved rudely towards NATO. I think that Brussels will not even "express deep concern." You are going to buy so many air defense weapons, and where are you going to get the money from? A loan from the IMF?)))
                1. NTD
                  0
                  23 October 2020 18: 19
                  Quote: TermNachTER
                  Will NATO support Turkey?)))

                  If there is a war between Turkey and Iran, 100% will support.
                  1. 0
                    23 October 2020 18: 22
                    Europe even sent Italy tries when she asked for money to fight the corona virus. Why do you think that Europe will get into "misunderstandings" because of Turkey, which is behaving towards Europe openly in a boorish way?
              2. 0
                23 October 2020 17: 51
                In my opinion, you are too committed.
                Iran has proven its fighting qualities during the war with Iraq.
                Despite the fact that Iraq was much better armed, the war was fought on an equal footing.
                Kstty.
                Now Damascus is covered by a complex of Iranian air defense systems.
                Let's see it in action.
                The performance characteristics of these systems are quite decent.
                And the fighting qualities of the Turkish army are exaggerated.
                Well, you are closer and more deeply into what is happening.
                Although sometimes, from the outside, much looks more adequate.
                "You can't see a face face to face."
                Good luck to you.
                hi
                1. 0
                  23 October 2020 19: 00
                  "According to reports, Tehran has deployed air defense systems Bavar-373, Khordad-15, Khordad-3 and Mersad on Syrian territory, as well as radar and other equipment to combat air targets. Now the sky over Damascus is covered by analogues of Russian S-300s.

                  The Bavar-373 is a variant of the S-300 air defense system. It was introduced in August 2019. It is stated that it is capable of monitoring the air situation at a distance of up to 400-450 km and tracking up to 100 targets simultaneously. At the same time, it can launch 12 Sayyad-4 missiles against 6 targets at a distance of up to 200 km and an altitude of up to 27 km.

                  Khordad-15 was shown in June 2019. It is specified that it is capable of detecting various air targets at a distance of 120-150 km and hitting them at a distance of 45-85 km, depending on the characteristics of the flying object.

                  Khordad-3 appeared in 2012. This air defense system can detect objects at a distance of up to 105 km and shoot them down at a distance of up to 75 km and an altitude of 25 km. In June 2019, Khordad-3 successfully hit a US Air Force drone in the Persian Gulf.

                  Mersad was developed in 2011 based on the American Hawk air defense systems, which Tehran received before the 1979 revolution. According to the Iranian side, they are capable of hitting targets at a distance of 70-150 km at an altitude of up to 18 km. "
    2. -5
      23 October 2020 11: 22
      Iran's hands are now untied. They will build up pressure in the region.
    3. +4
      23 October 2020 11: 23
      That's right - who needs shells to arrive on his territory because of other people's showdowns
      1. -1
        23 October 2020 12: 42
        Quote: Krasnodar
        That's right - who needs shells to arrive on his territory because of other people's showdowns

        The conflict is dragging on and spreading: Turkey actively supports Azerbaijan, Georgia fears for the oil pipeline, Tran threatens both sides with his finger.
        1. -2
          23 October 2020 12: 47
          Well so - the farther south, the worse
        2. +3
          23 October 2020 13: 06
          Quote: Bearded
          The conflict drags on and spreads

          I wonder if Pashinyan, unlike Pastor Schlag, knows how to ski? And then it would be time to grease them already.
    4. +4
      23 October 2020 11: 31
      Still ... they will get carried away and from these two they can fly in a ricochet ...
      1. +4
        23 October 2020 11: 42
        Many have already flown there, but Iran still suffers ... hi
        1. +4
          23 October 2020 11: 47
          hi
          Terpelka is not endless ...
          1. +5
            23 October 2020 11: 52
            That's just the point, they organize a provocation and draw Iran into the conflict ...
    5. +1
      23 October 2020 11: 41
      Tehran will not side with Yerevan. This is mainly due to the personality of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who holds a pro-American position.
      Friends are known in trouble, it seems that the United States is not friends at all to Pashinyan, despite his pro-American position. laughing
      1. 0
        23 October 2020 11: 49
        Quote: Daniil Konovalenko
        It looks like the United States is not friends at all to Pashinyan, despite his pro-American position. laughing

        Who is Pashinyan and who needs his position ??? The Americans simply used it as a one-time pawn in their Great Caucasian Party and threw it away - the process of throwing it out is the war in Karabakh !!!
      2. +2
        23 October 2020 12: 18
        Everything is like in life - you have taken a position and your friends are already turning away from you
      3. +3
        23 October 2020 13: 12
        FSHA has no friends, there are slaves and enemies.
    6. +1
      23 October 2020 11: 42
      And if we feel the need, then the necessary measures will definitely be taken


      But there may be provocations ...
      1. +1
        23 October 2020 13: 45
        Well, Duc, "a small provokashechku" can and a third party "zababahat" interested in expanding the conflict.
        1. +1
          23 October 2020 16: 09
          So it is the third, they are only looking for an excuse, and here such an opportunity ...
    7. NTD
      -4
      23 October 2020 11: 59
      - Jalali said, adding that both Baku and Yerevan were warned about the consequences.

      Yes, go with your warning to hell! Yesterday you were exactly you who were warned in the most severe form so that you could distinguish who is the occupier and who is the victim of the occupation and you know from whom.

      Despite the fact that Iran has excellent relations with Armenia and not very good with Azerbaijan, Tehran will not side with Yerevan. This is mainly due to the personality of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who holds a pro-American position, and, as you know, the United States is enemy No. 1 for Iran.

      Another lie. Persians and Armenians speak of each other as blood, one and different faith. I repeat, the conversation is about farces. They helped the Armenians. The Azerbaijani side has shown this more than once. After Erdogan warned him to distinguish correctly who is who, they closed the border for Armenia's military cargo. And on Azerbaijan they like dogs can bark but nothing more because then they will regret !!! They know this very well. Just one mistake in their diplomacy towards Azerbaijan, they will bitterly regret it.

      Iran on October 21 began a large-scale military exercise codenamed "Defender of the Skies-99"
      No matter how many jackals shout and run, they won't become lions !!!
      1. +2
        23 October 2020 12: 28
        Quote: MTN
        No matter how many jackals shout and run, they won't become lions !!!

        oh, how, already and on the Persians lifted a paw, Azeri propagandon. laughing The main thing is to praise Putin in time and lick the Russian hyperpatriots so that they do not stumble on VO? Have you, trolls, been sent all over the Runet? Or only on patriotic sites? Was there an order to kill Armenian cuisine on culinary websites?
        1. -1
          23 October 2020 12: 54
          And in Yerevan now Zhengalov Hatz is baked ...)))
          And the Persians are a talented nation, but their leadership - bearded boys in dresses, the Central Asian counterparts of Conchita Wyurst, have achieved the degradation of a country that was rapidly developing under the Shah for decades.
          Although in the subject of falling shells it is clear what they do not like. Who cares about it?
        2. 0
          23 October 2020 13: 12
          lick the Russian hyper-patriots so that they don't stumble on VO

          Just the opposite. Liberoids, like any sexual minority, are more closely knit and cohesive. Therefore, they attack in flocks and bypass purposefully)) hyperpatriots are more individualistic and lazy Yes
        3. NTD
          +1
          23 October 2020 13: 30
          Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
          oh, how, already and on the Persians lifted a paw, Azeri propagandon.

          Half of the population there are Turks. As the Armenians like to say, "the rights of peoples" and even more so they have lived there for a long time from time immemorial ..... but what? All of us can be crammed with the rights of peoples, but we can't? Moreover, I saw the state of their elite troops in Syria. Penny prices to them. They are not warriors, they are not wars ...

          and yet you yourself are propagandists and even squared !!!

          Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
          The main thing is to praise Putin in time and lick the Russian hyperpatriots

          I have no claim to Putin except gratitude and I have something for that. I have a grater with a humpback. Which broke the union. As well as my people, so am I, but sorry for the Soviet Union, we didn’t want its collapse, that I will not say about those whom you protect.

          Hey Abtsaz, I'm not in politics at all. For the fact that I write the loot, too, do not receive. I am an ordinary citizen. I just understand who is who and what it is. Half of the Iranian army are Turks. Even the corrupt Khomeini himself is a shame to the Islamic world is also a Turk. Only obfuscated. If they say their air defense is better than the Russian S400 and their tanks are better than the Russian ones, then I'm not afraid for my army. Moreover, there are quite a few of those who want to break them. We are not alone. You don't even need to participate. Pashinyan will do everything for us. And after Syria, Iran's turn. Then I hope justice will prevail, southern and northern Azerbaijan will unite. Although this is purely my personal opinion. Therefore, as long as they do not touch me, they are not my enemies.


          1. -3
            23 October 2020 13: 59
            Quote: MTN
            I will not say about those whom you protect.

            Yes, I'm not defending anyone, to me that you, that the Armenians - in general, give a fuck, even if you bomb each other there in the Stone Age - in Moscow your p .... sorry, there won't be fewer faces. You are here at least turn inside out - as they did not love you in Russia, they will not. And the majority here do not care about your Karabakhi-barabakhi, "victories" and other propaganda slag (including yours), the main thing is that Russia should not be drawn into it. Here is such a sermyaga, Azertroll.
            1. NTD
              0
              23 October 2020 15: 49
              Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
              Yes, I'm not protecting anyone

              It's not about your protection, but about the way you communicate. I respectfully speak to you and you do not. Learn to respect all users, especially since nothing bad has been said to you personally.
              Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
              And the majority here do not care about your Karabakhi-barabakhs, "victories" and other propaganda slag

              This is a military site with a forum. Let's respect the opinion of each of us. You write to everyone to spit on the Caucasus, this is far from the case. The Kremlin does not think so. And some users who are in the subject they also do not care about the region. Moreover, this region concerns the will of Peter.
          2. +1
            23 October 2020 15: 08
            Did I understand correctly that Iran may well get a fifth column?
            1. NTD
              0
              23 October 2020 15: 46
              Quote: Alexander Kopychev
              Did I understand correctly that Iran may well get a fifth column?

              And don't even hesitate. In history they have had more than once.
              1. 0
                23 October 2020 15: 52
                In this case, "the evening ceases to be languid." In the meantime, today is the day of diplomatic statements from the quiet fart of Guterres to the serious grumbling of Jalali.
          3. +3
            23 October 2020 15: 52
            Quote: MTN
            Like my people, so am I, but sorry for the Soviet Union, we didn’t want it to collapse, so I won’t say about those you are defending

            I dare to remind you. The first, the second and the third, who announced their well, very sovereign sovereignty, are the Balts. Fourth place .... Azerbaijan. September 1989. Yes You began to destroy the organs of state power in the same 1989. As well as to demolish the state border. Calling a spade a spade .... They staged a real mutiny that required the introduction of troops. Sorry, generously, but against your background .... The most westernized zapadentsy, suffering from the most severe form of banderophilia, almost looked like defenders of the USSR. Yes
            PS
            You are the one. Consider the specifics. You are not propagandizing in a mountain village. In which the words internet and shaitan are synonyms, the news is delivered by the postman who visits every six months, and the stories are taught by mullah da bay, from the clan that rules the country. Lying as openly as you are lying is definitely not worth it. The curator of the Internet day will not pay. lol
          4. 0
            23 October 2020 18: 07
            I think you are fundamentally wrong about the situation. I understand patriotic feelings and all that. But patriotism alone cannot win a war.
      2. +5
        23 October 2020 12: 31
        Quote: MTN
        And on Azerbaijan they like dogs can bark but nothing more because then they will regret !!! They know this very well. Just one mistake in their diplomacy towards Azerbaijan, they will bitterly regret it.

        Quote: MTN
        No matter how many jackals shout and run, they won't become lions !!!

        Dizziness from success in full growth.
        For Azerbaijan now only a full-scale war with Iran is not enough for complete happiness.
        1. 0
          23 October 2020 12: 55
          Jews will help Azerbaijanis if there is a mess with the Persians. And this time not only by selling weapons, believe me!
          1. 0
            23 October 2020 18: 11
            You cannot ask the Jews for snow in winter. As the gold reserves of Azerbaijan are depleted, the desire to trade will decrease. Do you observe oil and gas prices on international markets?
            1. -1
              23 October 2020 18: 17
              This is a common misconception - Jews always trade with a "long sight". And at the same time, they do not remain at a loss. Israel has its own gas, and Brent futures - 42-something, a drop of 0,1 percent. hi
        2. NTD
          0
          23 October 2020 15: 54
          Quote: Alexey RA
          For Azerbaijan now only a full-scale war with Iran is not enough for complete happiness.

          Dear Alexey, you still did not understand what I wrote. Understand the war between Azerbaijan and Iran is not possible. Even if someday this happens, I assure Azerbaijan will wage a defensive war and nothing more !!! Because there are more powerful countries for the Attack on Iran, Iran has many "friends". I know at least 8 countries that will go for it. Israel. UAE. USA. Britannia. Australia. Canada. Saudi Arabia and probably there will be someone from NATO in the person of Germany or France or Italy. Mind you, I did not even indicate Turkey.
          1. +1
            23 October 2020 18: 14
            You listed countries with such "terrible" armies, with the exception of the United States, that I cried a lot))) The Saudis have been fighting the Houthis in Yemen for how many years? How is it going? The UAE is even worse)))) Do you think England, Canada will get into some obscure whore? Afghanistan was enough for them - there are no fools.
            1. NTD
              -1
              23 October 2020 18: 22
              Quote: TermNachTER
              Saudis have been fighting the Houthis in Yemen for how many years? How is it going?

              Guerrilla warfare what were you waiting for?
              Quote: TermNachTER
              Do you think England, Canada will get into some obscure fornicator?

              Where is the queen and there is a vassal. The Queen needs oil. Britain does not ask Canada and Australia, but orders.
      3. 0
        23 October 2020 12: 43
        Iran hinted that you would figure it out yourself, but if it ricochets in, they will give you a hat. Both.
        It's funny to see how, after taking a couple of villages, Azerbots began yapping at one of the leaders of the region, who have one of the most powerful armies.
        1. NTD
          +1
          23 October 2020 15: 57
          Quote: Jager
          leaders of the region with one of the most powerful armies.

          Believe me, it is not so powerful. His generals will be hit right in the toilet with a targeted blow and they will not understand where. If their army was from and to from farces, I would somehow believe you ... in terms of the number of ground forces. Yes, there is an army, but the Air Force is trough. Navy - metal. Air defense, I would not say that at the level either. Their air defense has not yet participated in total wars. The only thing they have is the number of tanks, piles of metal. Personnel in one word.
          1. 0
            23 October 2020 18: 53
            And then what is the army of Azerbaijan (I generally keep quiet about Armenia) in comparison with the army of Iran? Well funny.
      4. -3
        23 October 2020 12: 47
        You can divide Azerbaijan, Baku (oil) + Elizavetopol of Russia, Karabakh of Armenia, Lenkaran to Iran.
        Everyone is happy.
        1. 0
          23 October 2020 13: 01
          Quote: Voentorg
          Everyone is happy.

          Armenian taxi drivers (the main experts in everything) in the parking lot at Domodedovo applauded. Even they hadn't thought of that. Bravo.
      5. 0
        23 October 2020 13: 59
        I wouldn't be so excited. The demographic, economic and military capabilities of Iran are such that it will completely "pull" the war against Turkey and Azerbaijan. Especially considering that Turkey is already involved in three conflicts of medium intensity. And Azerbaijan has already thrown everything that was combat-ready on Karabakh. So the situation is very ambiguous. There is a suspicion that the Persians are simply waiting for the southern group to climb into the mountains. Deploying a column of armor on mountain serpentines is a very exciting experience.
        1. NTD
          0
          23 October 2020 16: 03
          Quote: TermNachTER
          I wouldn't be so excited. The demographic, economic and military capabilities of Iran are such that it will completely "pull" the war against Turkey and Azerbaijan.

          Nikolay, not Turkey, not Azerbaijan, the war does not need with Iran. But this war will be, I do not know how Turkey, but Azerbaijan will definitely conduct defensive tactics. Iran doesn’t bite us because of its size. They have a large personnel, but if from Afghanistan, the Persian Gulf, and Iraq and Turkey and Georgia, and probably also Pashinyan's little baby from Armenia, they will attack, then Iran will dream of a zviziz. Understand technologically Iran lags behind for many years. The Americans will let in so many Tamogauts that their air defense will be covered with a copper basin. To wage a long war against Iran, its enemies have such opportunities both with money and equipment and an army. Iran has oil, a lot of oil. And if there is oil, then there is no dermocracy. Remember these words. And then there is also an atom. In short, like this. Even Australia will participate in this war. Britain, USA, Canada, Australia are the four everywhere. Plus to these also the Arabs and Jews, especially since they have now begun to love. So I would not be so sure about Iran.
          1. 0
            23 October 2020 18: 18
            It will take a long time to assemble a second coalition, as in 1993, and the war could end quickly. "Tomahawks" in Syria somehow did not show themselves very well, and the air defense of Iran is quite normal. If you had a direct conflict with Iran, many would "subscribe" for you, but Turkey is with you, and many people do not like the Sultan.
        2. -1
          23 October 2020 18: 24
          Quote: TermNachTER
          I wouldn't be so excited. The demographic, economic and military capabilities of Iran are such that it will completely "pull" the war against Turkey and Azerbaijan. Especially considering that Turkey is already involved in three conflicts of medium intensity. And Azerbaijan has already thrown everything that was combat-ready on Karabakh. So the situation is very ambiguous. There is a suspicion that the Persians are simply waiting for the southern group to climb into the mountains. Deploying a column of armor on mountain serpentines is a very exciting experience.

          Now attacks by a crowd of militias on mines on enemy positions will not work. Other firepower, coordination between branches of the armed forces, etc. And the front line, as such, is not. Whoever takes the air is in favor. And the Turks will take it. The only thing is that the Persians will start a war of cities with a solid missile potential. They will hit the peace people. The question - how much it will work against the Turkic peoples - in my opinion, will only embitter.
    8. 0
      23 October 2020 12: 21
      Persians-bastards, fluffed up the tail. Their dirty tricks within the KSAPO cannot be compared with the same freaks of the Turks.
      Subjectively, if Iran were in the state of Iraq or the IRA, it would be easier for the Russian Federation both in the SA and in the Transcaucasus.
      1. +5
        23 October 2020 12: 27
        Quote: WFP
        Subjectively, if Iran were in the state of Iraq or the IRA, it would be easier for the Russian Federation both in the SA and in the Transcaucasus.

        If Iran were in the state of Iraq, then ISIS banned in the Russian Federation would now be in Central Asia and Azerbaijan. Because without the help of Iran (Suleimani with his IRGC and pro-Iranian militia), Iraq would lie under ISIS in a couple of months. Iran, weak in this alternative, would follow.
        1. +3
          23 October 2020 12: 45
          No need for sad fairy tales about Persians and blacks. Salafis permanently spoil the air both in the CA and in Iran and the same Azerbaijan. In the republics of the FSU, on the subject of radicals from Islam (not to be confused with normal believers, although this is the same fashion as “true Orthodoxy”) they woke up in 99 (the trigger was the “races” in Batkent and the Second Chechen named after the head of the club).
          The Persians trampled and will trample the path to the Pamirs, and if the browed one gets cold, we will still get (or click) a flash in the Republic of Tatarstan and among the Kirghiz (where our non-Red Army soldiers are stationed).
        2. -2
          23 October 2020 12: 57
          Cheto, before the arrival of the RF Aerospace Forces in Syria, the IRGC did not show any particular efficiency - Assad did not even control the suburbs of Damascus
          1. +1
            23 October 2020 14: 55
            Quote: Krasnodar
            Cheto, before the arrival of the RF Aerospace Forces in Syria, the IRGC did not show any particular efficiency - Assad did not even control the suburbs of Damascus

            I wrote not about Syria, but about Iraq. Where the matter, pomnitsa, got to the point that the IRGC had to liberate Saddam's hometown. smile
            There was no Russian Aerospace Forces in Iraq. But the Iranians worked quite efficiently.
            1. -1
              23 October 2020 15: 26
              Did the IRGC work in Iraq? There, it seems, the amers did everything - Mosul and others, and Raqqa in Syria - they too
              1. +1
                26 October 2020 15: 28
                Quote: Krasnodar
                Did the IRGC work in Iraq?

                Himself in shock. smile
                The IRGC acted there under the guise of a "Shiite militia" that officially "helped the Iraqi army", but in fact - fought for it.
                1. 0
                  26 October 2020 15: 36
                  I agree here - the question is that they fought there without the Merikatos
    9. -1
      23 October 2020 12: 41
      As if the army of Azerbaijan is strong. They only win over Armenia, because Pashinyan is draining Karabakh (air defense is on vacation, relations with Russia and Iran are in the red).
      1. +1
        23 October 2020 12: 58
        It will be necessary - the Jews will be pumped with specialists and pilots
      2. NTD
        +1
        23 October 2020 16: 06
        Quote: Voentorg
        They only win against Armenia, because Pashinyan is draining Karabakh

        Is this a new topic, yes? laughing No evidence was found with the barmaley, just like the Turkish soldiers in battles, they now moved on to a new topic, if not for Pashinyan, Azerbaijanis would have been drowned in the Caspian Sea. bully
    10. -1
      23 October 2020 12: 43
      Iran will simply occupy 10 km of Karabakh, the zone along the border, and everything will end there.
      This is certainly an option, but it looks like this is what some behind-the-scenes people are trying to achieve?
      1. 0
        23 October 2020 14: 04
        Why not? Make your own safety zone to protect civilians from Azerbaijani terrorists. What is the bad wording? And most importantly - how noble.
      2. NTD
        0
        23 October 2020 16: 08
        Quote: APASUS
        Ran will just take 10 km of Karabakh, the zone along the border, and that's it.

        Sometimes it seems to me that Shushan is pouring news from the region here. News is always one thing and reality is different.

        "Mr. President, the 760-kilometer state border between Iran and Azerbaijan will remain the border of friendship, peace and security for the two neighboring peoples without the presence and interference of ill-wishers," Iranian Ambassador to Azerbaijan Seyid Abbas Mousavi wrote on Twitter.

        "Iranians rejoice at the happiness of Muslim brothers and sisters in Azerbaijan," the Iranian ambassador said.

        It should be reminded that the day before, thanks to the liberation of the village of Agbend, Zangilan region, full control over the state border of Azerbaijan with Iran was ensured. President of the Republic of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev congratulated the Azerbaijani and Iranian peoples on this occasion.
    11. +2
      23 October 2020 12: 50
      Having taken Zangilan, having entered the border crossing with Armenia and Iran, Azerbaijan now fully controls the border of the Karabakh region with Iran. And the further it moves to the north in a wide front, the less there will be accidental flights into Iran.
    12. 0
      24 October 2020 06: 46
      Enemies breathe in Iran's back. Also Turkey and Russia. So they will puff up their cheeks, but limit themselves to tomatoes. These are all major players nearby. The United States is not up to this, China will not fit in, and the British are used to fighting with someone else's hands.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"