F-22 against "Bears": Fifth generation fighters climbed to intercept the Tu-5 of the Russian Aerospace Forces in the Alaska region

43

On the evening of October 19, American aircraft aviation were raised on alert to intercept Russian Tu-95s traveling in international airspace in the Alaska region.

The information about the interception appeared on the official page of the Joint Aerospace Defense Command of North America (NORAD) on the social network Twitter. According to the American military, F-22 fighters intercepted 2 Russian Tu-95 bombers, called "Bears", accompanied by 2 Su-35 fighters.



In addition, NORAD's means identified a Russian A-50 long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft located 50 nautical miles off the coast of Alaska.

At the same time, the Pentagon noted that all Russian aircraft were in international airspace and did not violate the borders of the sovereign US airspace. Nevertheless, NORAD forces, which are supposed to quickly respond to such situations, raised fighters to intercept.

The flexibility and readiness of our staff ensures that we successfully manage potential aerospace threats,

- emphasized the commander of the US Northern Command, General Glen Van Herk.


It should be noted that the Russian military department emphasized the planned nature of the flight. Both Russian and American military aircraft make such flights quite often. For example, American planes periodically appear near the Russian borders in the Baltic and Black Sea regions.

Not so long ago, a plane of the Royal Air Force of Great Britain cruised over the Barents Sea, to accompany which our MiGs took off.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -17
    20 October 2020 15: 15
    Generation conflict)
    1. +12
      20 October 2020 15: 19
      Quote: el Santo
      Generation conflict)

      What does this have to do with it? Tu - 95 carries X-101 missiles, which themselves fly well, at 5,5 thousand km. He, in fact, does not need to come so close to the territory of the Mattress for nothing. Yes
      1. -24
        20 October 2020 16: 00
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Tu - 95 carries X-101 missiles, which themselves fly well, at 5,5 thousand km

        This is unknown to science. Science is not yet in the know! (C)
        Now, after the first combat use of this world-famous complex in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, we can discuss the excellent quality of the S-300.
        1. +1
          21 October 2020 09: 51
          Sure sure lol And let's first discuss how the super American Patriot air defense in the SA famously beat on their positions, forcing the Saudis to play with a ladle, and the whole world laughing at the "best" in the world, super technologically advanced air defense mattress covers. This is exactly what science knows)))) lol
          1. 0
            22 October 2020 05: 28
            You'd better be careful with profanity.
      2. +8
        20 October 2020 16: 18
        He, in fact, does not need to come so close to the territory of the Mattress for nothing.

        Very necessary. Let the F-22 develop its engine life.
        They already complain that he is missing. We continue flights.
        1. +7
          20 October 2020 16: 23
          Quote: Alex777

          Very necessary. Let the F-22 develop its engine life.
          They already complain that he is missing. We continue flights.

          Yes, and Our Pilots need to maintain shape and gain experience!
          Normal working environment!
        2. -10
          20 October 2020 18: 43
          Quote: Alex777
          Very necessary. Let the F-22 develop its engine life.
          They already complain that he is missing.

          But India is dissatisfied with the resource of Russian aircraft engines, considering them twice as inferior to American ones.
          1. 0
            21 October 2020 04: 58
            But India is dissatisfied with the resource of Russian aircraft engines, considering them twice as inferior to American ones.

            name me at least one US-made combat fighter in service with India. Are you trying to throw it on the fan again?
            India has only transports of American aircraft. Hopefully enough is enough to tell the difference between a turbojet fighter jet and a theater of heavy-lift aircraft?
            1. -3
              21 October 2020 11: 05
              There was a time of purchasing Soviet fighters. And even Russian, when India was under Western arms sanctions in connection with nuclear weapons tests.
              But that time has gone irrevocably, and at Indian tenders, products from the Russian Federation are now swept aside, first of all, in favor of the same "Rafal". And the Indians scored on the Su-57. Isn't it?
              1. +2
                21 October 2020 11: 21
                But that time has gone irrevocably, and at Indian tenders, products from the Russian Federation are now swept aside, first of all, in favor of the same "Rafal". And the Indians scored on the Su-57

                what is swept aside and what they scored to guess is like a finger in the sky. In tender procedures, the assessment of the aircraft itself is only 50%. And the rest is its cost, the equipment transferred, training, the possibility of integrating it into their ACS by aviation. Well, such bonuses, which Asians are very fond of now, are the permission to localize all or part of units and assemblies.
                but the Indians could evaluate the engines only during operation. But they have no operating experience either Pratov or GE
          2. 0
            21 October 2020 09: 59
            Quote: el Santo
            But India is dissatisfied with the resource of Russian aircraft engines, considering them twice as inferior to American ones.

            Uh-huh ... they were already unhappy with the quality of Russian engines once. True, later it turned out that these were Indian engines, and the reason for their failure was poor assembly and poor maintenance in parts (everything that looked like oil was used as oil in engines). smile
            1. -2
              21 October 2020 11: 11
              Come on .. Like, fools themselves? India has repeatedly complained about Russian fighters in recent years. It is enough to look at the headlines of past years. 2003: India suspends supplies of Su-30MKI fighters, the reason is engine breakdowns. 2015 - auditors from Delhi considered that the Russian fighters were not reliable enough in operation. A year later: India claims that the deck-mounted MiG-29Ks have many defects and shortcomings. Two years ago, the same MiGs again fell out of favor, now for problems with the power plant.

              And the other day India put forward an ultimatum to Russia because of the frequent breakdowns of fighters.
              India has decided to suspend the use of MiG-29K fighters. According to the local Air Force, the planes have a weak spot that Russian aircraft designers have not fixed for many years - the RD-33MK engine. This is the jet engine that MiG uses in all of its recent projects.
              As the Indians write, the engine has problems with fuel manifolds and increased oil consumption, it breaks down too often - 15 times in the past years. As a result, a kind of ultimatum came out of the letter: either Russia is fixing the problems of MiGs, or we are not buying them. And the contract there is significant - almost $ 2,5 billion.
              1. +1
                21 October 2020 12: 31
                Quote: el Santo
                2015 - auditors from Delhi considered that Russian fighters were not reliable enough in operation.

                Mwa ha ha ...
                ... Defense Minister Manohar Parikkar said that the Indian Su-30MKI fleet is experiencing big problems with the level of serviceable aircraft, primarily due to breakdowns of the power plant.
                India operates a modification of the Su-30MKI, which is not very different from the Algerian version. At the same time, according to the Minister of Defense, it is known that the Indian Air Force has already had five accidents and 69 incidents. with AL-31FP engines manufactured by HAL since 2012... Of the 69 incidents, Parrikar said, 33 were caused by swarf in the oil, 11 were caused by engine vibration, and eight were due to very low oil pressure. Accusations were made regarding poor build quality, as a result of which a fatigue effect quickly set in, causing cracks, which led to the appearance of metal fragments and an oil circuit. The investigation also drew attention to the quality of the oil. By order of the Indian Ministry of Defense, measures were taken: the use of better quality oil, alteration and replacement of welding and fasteners between mechanical parts.
                © bmpd
                In short, the engines turned out to be Indian. And the reliability problems were caused precisely by the quality Indian assemblies of engines and Indian service in parts.
                1. 0
                  22 October 2020 12: 41
                  Don't you find that the actions of the Indian "experts" are very reminiscent of the business of Vasily Alibabaevich from "Gentlemen of Fortune", who diluted gasoline with donkey urine !?
                  1. +1
                    22 October 2020 12: 46
                    Quote: Yngvar
                    Don't you find that the actions of the Indian "experts" are very reminiscent of the business of Vasily Alibabaevich from "Gentlemen of Fortune", who diluted gasoline with donkey urine !?

                    Even worse: Vasily Alibabaevich even sold diluted gasoline "on the side", but Indian specialists dilute it first, and then use it themselves. smile
      3. +2
        20 October 2020 18: 24
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Tu - 95 carries X-101 missiles, which themselves fly well, at 5,5 thousand km.

        The bear does not carry the Ha 101 in the inner compartments. It can only be carried out on external suspension systems, which is prohibited by the dying START-3. Perhaps the latest modifications can do this, but this is not known. So the flight and interception is absolutely peaceful. We flew around our domain. They guard their domain. Clearly by agreement.
        Shl. The closest border between the Russian Federation and the United States is only 3 km
        1. +3
          20 October 2020 20: 45
          Three! Aircraft Tu142! got away from intercepting five NATO interceptors in the Norwegian Sea, without a trace. Well that's it, about the old plane
        2. 0
          21 October 2020 10: 01
          Quote: Tusv

          The bear does not carry the Ha 101 in the inner compartments. It can only be used on external suspensions, which is prohibited by the dying START-3.

          But who remembers this agreement ...

          © Russian Ministry of Defense. Preparation of strategic bombers-missile carriers Tu-95MS for a combat mission at the Engels airfield.
    2. +3
      20 October 2020 16: 34
      Quote: el Santo
      Generation conflict)

      As always...
    3. 0
      21 October 2020 10: 05
      I already wrote. that on the old militaryphotos there was a caricature: "grandfather" F-4 and "father" F-15 show a young F-22 on a Tu-95 flying in the background (with a long beard): "Now son, it's your time to chase him".
  2. +1
    20 October 2020 15: 17
    I wonder if the Tu-95s were accompanied by our Su-35s, how close the Raptors were allowed to our bomber ...
    1. -9
      20 October 2020 15: 22
      They didn't see him
      1. 0
        20 October 2020 16: 27
        Quote: abror
        They didn't see him

        The F-22 with outboard tanks is seen as a normal aircraft.
    2. +1
      20 October 2020 18: 15
      Quote: Alexey-74
      how close the Raptors were allowed to our bomber ...

      It's up to whose border is closer and whose escort is cooler
    3. +1
      22 October 2020 05: 36
      Is the war going to fight?
      Our journalists still need to master the terminology. The Americans took off not to intercept, but to escort. The interception ends with the shooting down of the target aircraft or interceptor. This is ACCOMPANYING.
      Our dryers did nothing for the same reason, well, they fly nearby and let them fly. We also accompany their planes.
  3. -7
    20 October 2020 15: 19
    it is necessary to make a special terribly radioactive version on automatic equipment or make an analogue of a giant X-ray machine or an electromagnetic emitter directed inside and run it more often - let them accompany it))).
    1. -13
      20 October 2020 16: 05
      it is necessary to conduct a new test of "Zircon" in Kamchatka, or better - in Chukotka, so that such "escorts" are generally urgently evacuated from Alaska.
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The environmental disaster in Kamchatka could have been caused by the tests of the Zircon hypersonic missile. This version is presented in the material posted some time ago on the pages of the domestic media.
  4. HAM
    +3
    20 October 2020 15: 23
    Most likely, the main thing here was not the "bears", but the A-50 ... I hope that was the case ..
    1. 0
      20 October 2020 15: 51
      the Americans reported that they intercepted 2 TU 95 and 2 SU 35.And they saw 50. But ours write that there were 2 more MiGs and 31 naval aviation. Amers did not say a word about them. I have the right to fantoise The A50 and MiG 31 bunch did their job. probably waiting for debriefing, for Migi 31. Or the author specifically missed it for fun. good
    2. -6
      20 October 2020 15: 51
      Quote: HAM
      A-50.

      Yeah, very interesting how he found the F-22.
      1. +3
        20 October 2020 16: 03
        Radar, how else? Or do you think that oaptors are completely invisible in the radio range? An invisible plane is the only one that is not. In the air where it is empty for the radius of the radar, any, even a small target is visible.
      2. -11
        20 October 2020 16: 07
        Quote: Bez 310
        Yeah, very interesting how he found the F-22.

        Intuition prompted
      3. +2
        20 October 2020 16: 32
        Quote: Bez 310
        Yeah, very interesting how he found the F-22.

        This is how the F-22 is seen in the sight of the Su-35.
        1. -1
          20 October 2020 19: 02
          Quote: figvam
          This is how the F-22 is seen in the sight of the Su-35.

          Much more interesting is how the F-22 is visible on the A-50 radar.
        2. -6
          20 October 2020 19: 23
          This is how the Ukrainian Su-27 was seen from space for Mishka Leontyev, attacking the Malaysian Boeing over Donbass.
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXeBcruHOMA
    3. +1
      20 October 2020 18: 32
      Quote: HAM
      and A-50 ... I hope that it was ..

      Neither we nor the Yankees of spies, to put it mildly, do not like. They will draw a signature, places of deployment and "blowing sleepwalkers" (co)
  5. +1
    20 October 2020 15: 25
    Be careful with bears! Or maybe with a paw soldier
    Paws there ogogo ... Bring the world warmth and light laughing
  6. +1
    20 October 2020 15: 54
    What is the meaning of the news? The standard procedure, if no one flew out to intercept then I wonder why?
  7. -2
    20 October 2020 16: 28
    Soon elections in the USA, here they are trolling hehe
  8. -2
    20 October 2020 16: 52
    The usual scheduled flight and interception, and the local generals ran with hats wassat
    It was necessary to throw the contents under the propeller out of the Tu-95 "shitty", so that all the fashionable F-22 flashlights could be dumped. They would not have expected this, no matter how cool any detail that has no analogue in the world
  9. +7
    20 October 2020 17: 24
    Quote: yehat2
    we need to make a special creepy radioactive version

    And our aircraft technicians who will serve this "terribly radioactive version" do you mind ???
    1. +6
      20 October 2020 18: 34
      Quote: Old26
      Quote: yehat2
      we need to make a special creepy radioactive version

      And our aircraft technicians who will serve this "terribly radioactive version" do you mind ???

      Local "innovators" and "inventors" do not care. The main thing is to collect the plus signs.