Military Review

MRK "Odintsovo" in the framework of state tests conducted firing of the "Pantsir-M"

28
MRK "Odintsovo" in the framework of state tests conducted firing of the "Pantsir-M"

The small missile ship "Odintsovo" of project 22800 "Karakurt", which made an inter-fleet transition from the Northern Fleet to the Baltic Fleet, continued to undergo state tests before being transferred to the Navy. According to the press service of the Ministry of Defense, the crew of the MRK tested the Pantsir-M anti-aircraft missile and artillery complex installed on the ship.


MRK "Odintsovo" conducted live firing from the "Pantsir-M" complex at air targets, which were used as small-sized aircraft M-6 targets, delivered by Su-27 naval fighters aviation Of the Baltic fleet... The tests of the complex took place at one of the Baltic Fleet's offshore training grounds in the Baltic Sea.

As the press service of the Ministry of Defense said, during the implementation of practical missile and artillery firing, all the assigned targets were successfully hit.

In addition to the live firing, as part of the state tests, the ship's crew, together with the acceptance team and members of the acceptance commission, conducted maneuverable and high-speed tests of RTOs, and also checked the operation of all units, systems, weapons, navigation and radio technical aids.

The ship will be handed over to the Navy by the end of the year, the MRK will become part of the 1st Guards Division of the 36th Red Banner Order of Nakhimov, XNUMXst Class, of the missile boat brigade, which is located at the naval base in Baltiysk.

Recall that in September this year, the Odintsovo MRK, together with the Zeleny Dol MRK of Project 21631 Buyan-M and the Vasily Bykov patrol ship (corvette) of Project 22160, took part in testing weapons systems at the Northern Fleet's maritime ranges in the White Sea ...

MRK "Odintsovo" (laid down as "Shkval") is the third in the series and the second serial ship of Project 22800 Karakurt, built at the Pella shipyard in the interests of the Russian Navy. At the same time, "Odintsovo" is the first serial "Karakurt", on which the Pantsir-M anti-aircraft missile-gun complex (ZRPK) is installed. On the head MRK "Mytishchi" and the first serial "Sovetsk" air defense missile system "Pantsir-M" was not installed, they use 30-mm artillery mounts AK-630.

RTOs of this project have a length of 67 meters, a width of 11 meters and a draft of 4 meters. Displacement - about 800 tons, cruising range - up to 2500 miles, autonomy - 15 days. The main armament - one PU UKSK (universal ship complex) 3S14 RK for 8 KR "Caliber", one 76-mm gun mount AK-176MA, ZRPK Pantsir-M, two 14.5-mm or 12,7-mm machine gun MTPU.
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alien From
    Alien From 20 October 2020 12: 03
    11
    Well, let the ships be like the cities near Moscow)
    1. Hunter 2
      Hunter 2 20 October 2020 12: 10
      +3
      Quote: Alien From
      Well, let the ships be like the cities near Moscow)

      I will only support the Other Rank. And so the news is good, Karakurt received minimal air defense and successfully tested it.
      1. novel66
        novel66 20 October 2020 12: 22
        +3
        well, do you see all the UDCs? lol hi hi
        1. Hunter 2
          Hunter 2 20 October 2020 12: 25
          +5
          Welcome hi Why only UDC? Corvettes or Frigates, for starters ... it's too early to dream of more sad
          Although Karakurt is already progress in comparison with Buyan!
          1. novel66
            novel66 20 October 2020 12: 26
            +2
            cruiser nada! great rocket!
            1. Hunter 2
              Hunter 2 20 October 2020 12: 27
              +1
              Quote: novel xnumx
              cruiser nada! great rocket!

              This novel is still only in Dreams! drinks
            2. DominickS
              DominickS 20 October 2020 12: 41
              -1
              Nada destroyers about three dozen, and frigates, about fifty. But large missile targets for "harpoons" are just not needed.
              1. novel66
                novel66 20 October 2020 12: 46
                +1
                how many budgets are that?
        2. Shadow041
          Shadow041 20 October 2020 12: 25
          +7
          Well, let not UDC, but at least universal corvettes 20380-20385 and frigates. Non-universal ships cannot be the backbone of the fleet, they are too vulnerable and unable to provide the deployment of strategic nuclear submarines and full protection of their basing points
      2. donavi49
        donavi49 20 October 2020 12: 30
        +3
        Well, now the threats are changing. And its air defense / missile defense as a whole is not better than that of Buyans, only more expensive.

        For example, a typical threat in 2-3 years will be such a UAV - which carries 3 SOM-C anti-ship missiles at once (7 pylons for armament - 3 of them under KR / PKR / MK2x82 / 1x83).


        There will also be massive swarms of loitering shells. Which can be dropped from the air carrier.

        Well, the good old ones and workers in a minimal outfit - 4 Harpoons from a pair of Hornets will also be very difficult to counter with one shell.
        1. DrEng527
          DrEng527 20 October 2020 16: 31
          0
          Quote: donavi49
          And its air defense / missile defense as a whole is not better than that of Buyans, only more expensive.

          those. Duet and Gipka for you are equivalent to Armor M? funny ... bully
          1. donavi49
            donavi49 20 October 2020 17: 08
            +1
            Yes. For both will not be able to repulse the minimum detachment of forces allocated for its destruction (a pair of Hornets / Eurofighters with anti-ship missiles, a swarm of loitering ammunition, heavy UAVs with anti-ship missiles). If there is no difference, then why pay more wink .

            Its air defense works only by means of destruction, that is, in theory, even which helicopter with a Penguin will fire at it with impunity.


            And in terms of a group of missiles / drones, its effectiveness is not higher than that of the Duet and the Flexi pair. Moreover, a pair of Giboks can work even better for simple purposes and on Verba. One Shell just won't have enough reaction time.
            1. DrEng527
              DrEng527 20 October 2020 18: 18
              +2
              Quote: donavi49
              Yes. For both will not be able to repulse the minimum detachment of forces allocated to destroy it.

              1) I remember the anecdote of the GDP about the Israeli soldier - and that I alone will fight! bully
              2) in your coordinates you only need to build project 1144 wink
            2. lucul
              lucul 21 October 2020 13: 17
              0
              Yes. For both will not be able to repulse the minimum detachment of forces allocated for its destruction (a pair of Hornets / Eurofighters with anti-ship missiles, a swarm of loitering ammunition, heavy UAVs with anti-ship missiles). If there is no difference, then why pay more

              He alone will go against the whole AUG? ))) Or why are you going to launch Hornets?
              And if not AUG, but just a couple of corvettes, then its air defense is quite at the level. Well, with the Zircons, he's already a completely different song ...
              1. Lex_is
                Lex_is 21 October 2020 13: 39
                -1
                And if not AUG, but just a couple of corvettes, then its air defense is quite at the level.

                Of course at the level. Especially when you consider that neither the United States nor Great Britain have corvettes and no country in the world plans to use corvettes to fight enemy ships.

                But the aviation of the NATO fleets is the main means of fighting enemy ships.
      3. RealPilot
        RealPilot 20 October 2020 13: 35
        +4
        A good air defense system has become even better, went into series with the letter "M". And most importantly, more and more carriers are in the ranks!
        With what I congratulate good
        Great news.
  2. Eldorado
    Eldorado 20 October 2020 12: 06
    +5
    Seven feet under the keel!
  3. antivirus
    antivirus 20 October 2020 12: 17
    0
    what a pain what a pain Argentina-Jamaica -5: 0. and Russia does not have a single aircraft carrier.
    still waiting for cons

    humor does not take root in "boots"
    everybody takes it seriously
  4. venik
    venik 20 October 2020 12: 29
    +6
    MRK "Odintsovo" in the framework of state tests conducted firing of the "Pantsir-M"
    ======
    Well, Thank you, Lord! Finally! Another would be to add Pantsir-M on the "Buyans" under construction! It would be: "What the doctor ordered" !!!
  5. MinskFox
    MinskFox 20 October 2020 12: 38
    0
    Does anyone know if the first ships will be equipped with the "Shell" instead of the 630s?
  6. Dikson
    Dikson 20 October 2020 13: 29
    +3
    I would like to believe and hope that the naval version of the Shell turned out to be more sighted and able to see all kinds of Turkish-Israeli slow-moving plastic flying machines.
  7. ZEMCH
    ZEMCH 20 October 2020 13: 44
    +1
    Seven feet under the keel! Air defense will not hurt him at all))
  8. Old26
    Old26 20 October 2020 14: 06
    +3
    Quote: RealPilot
    A good air defense system has become even better, went into series with the letter "M".

    Actually, as far as I heard, the letter "M" in this case means "marine", not modernized. Therefore, to say how much better he has become is rather difficult.

    Quote: Dikson
    I would like to believe and hope that the naval version of the Shell turned out to be more sighted and able to see all kinds of Turkish-Israeli slow-moving plastic flying machines.

    You can believe. But hopes are more difficult. The complex installed at Odintsovo has the index "M" not because it is modernized, but because it is "marine". so I'm afraid that everything is left there, just like on land
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 20 October 2020 16: 51
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      You can believe. But hopes are more difficult. The complex installed at Odintsovo has the index "M" not because it is modernized, but because it is "marine". so I'm afraid that everything is left there, just like on land

      "Pantsir-M" is generally some kind of cross between "Kortika" and "Pantsir-SM".

      The radar for the naval version is similar to the SM.

      And SW. mina wrote that the radar channel works only in calm weather. As soon as mist rises into the air, the range drops sharply.
  9. Sergey Kazarinov
    Sergey Kazarinov 20 October 2020 20: 54
    +1
    Yes, shooting at the M-6 parachute target with the newest ZRAK Pantsir-M is hardly an achievement of the required efficiency, but rather a test of performance. At least 40 years ago, M-6s were also fired in state vehicles. But in any case, the 36th brigade is strengthening, which is of course nice
  10. Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 20 October 2020 21: 21
    +1
    Yeah...
    The epic with 22800 is fiercely delayed.
    Already three of our children have to walk on the sea to the fullest ...
    And in what year will their turn come recourse
    Do they need someone crying
    And they drove - terms, terms! Until 21'00, let's fire the fire! ..
    And who needs this heroism in the end? ...
    Right now, a similar epic with "Comet" will be drawn.
    Timing, timing! ...
    Do you have four diesel engines on them, interesting to know? ..
  11. ratan524
    ratan524 20 October 2020 22: 31
    0
    it's not bad too
  12. Chikua
    Chikua 23 October 2020 17: 43
    0
    Will it not be the same with the ships as with the NKR tanks?