Equipment "Ratnik" will be supplemented with a nano-drone

The St. Petersburg-based Kronstadt company, which specializes in the development of unmanned aerial vehicles, has developed a nano-unmanned aerial vehicle for the next generation of Ratnik equipment. This is stated in a press release distributed by the company.

As the chief designer of special projects of KT-Unmanned Systems JSC (Kronshtadt is included) Pavel Rozhkov explained, the company has proactively developed a nano-drone for the "soldiers of the future." A miniature UAV weighing 180 grams was demonstrated at the Army-2020 forum, where it aroused great interest from law enforcement agencies not only from Russia.

We have designed and manufactured a nano-UAV weighing 180 grams. It is needed to solve a number of specialized military tasks, in particular to equip the "soldiers of the future"

- said Rozhkov, adding that this drone is designed to conduct surveillance, search for objects, etc.

The performance data of the new mini-drone are not given.

The company explained that this development is the first, the specialists of Kronstadt have just begun development in this direction.

Note that the Ministry of Defense previously announced the entry of a mini-drone into the equipment of the next, third generation Ratnik, which is currently being developed.

Comments

[The leader of the Redskins]

In the "warrior" already so many offer to "shove" that personally to me the soldier of the future already begins to seem ...

Especially interesting then are the arguments about how much heavier the ammunition will weigh if you use a smaller caliber of weapons ...
Yes, at such a pace, a soldier will soon either carry a wheelbarrow with equipment along with him, or run with a small car!

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Especially interesting then are the arguments about how much heavier the ammunition will weigh if you use a smaller caliber of weapons ...

Of course, there is logic in your words. But, you see, such a drone will not be superfluous in the body kit. Something can and can be given up, but not from it.

[Lena Petrova]

Let him follow the fighter, like a bird, within a radius of 200-300 meters. No tasks, - sat down on the surface, and wait. :))

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Lena Petrova

Let him follow the fighter, like a bird, within a radius of 200-300 meters. No tasks, - sat down on the surface, and wait. :))

Perhaps this is the next stage in the development of drones. All at once - only in women's dreams.

[Streamil]

Yeah, and unmasks the fighter

[t-12]

A small drone (the size of a tit), moreover, with camouflage paint, does not unmask anyone. The task of the micro drone is to look around the corner and show the soldier that there.

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

But, you see, such a drone will not be superfluous in the body kit.

what for each fighter this device? Tactical reconnaissance data is only needed by the commander to make a decision, isn't he? Plus, building an ultralight compact drone is half the battle. Integrating a comfortable control and monitoring system into the complex is the main thing, kmk. That's where "nano" is)

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.

why does every fighter need this device?

Then, so that "each fighter must understand his own maneuver." And for this you need to know the situation within a radius of at least 1000 meters

[VO3A]

In modern warfare, soldiers are removed from the front lines; there should be no battlefield with people. Yes, this cannot be completely avoided, but this is not a calculated option, not the main one, a reserve one, if you want ... We do not understand this ... No need to cram unnecessary (another word is asked) ... The battle is conducted by a group of operators, which has a full an informational duplicated picture about the controlled (positional) area, with the help of the attached striking means ... When our stupid leaders understand this ... The army orders and rules the ball, not the manufacturers .. We have the opposite. They do not what they need, but what they can, and then they figure out where to shove it !!! We do not have a concept of modern combined-arms combat at all ... So we shovel or get results everywhere: Syria, Livmya, LDNR, Karabakh ... We have zero intelligence and target designation information systems, or rather, they simply DO NOT! And they do not ensure the destruction of the enemy in real time, even on our borders and controlled territories .. Modern army ?! It's funny, or rather sad ...

[air defense]

In modern warfare, soldiers are removed from the front line; there should be no battlefield with people.
Dreams, dreams, but until the soldier sets foot, the territory is not conquered, and the Saudi army with modern weapons is being helped by the United States, and a bunch of mercenaries cannot do anything with the Houthis, and moreover, this is direct clashes, not even a guerrilla war.
And the most powerful army in the world, the United States is forced to negotiate with the Taliban, because they cannot do anything.

So we rake it off or we get the result everywhere: Syria, Livmya, LDNR, Karabakh ...
We are so raking in Syria that Assad has almost squeezed out everyone he can. In Liivi, Russia only supplies weapons and specialists, in the LDNR Ukraine had and until now has a numerical and material advantage, but cannot crush two shortcomings, and fortunately Russia does not fight at all in Karabakh.

[VO3A]

... stuck his head in the sand, and then what? And why is this your opus? This is not even a position, but just an empty excuse !!!

[air defense]

What is your opus for? Look at the fighting in Syria and everything from your lamentations of Yaroslavna is there:

We have zero intelligence and target designation information systems, or rather they simply DO NOT! And they do not provide the destruction of the enemy in real time, even on our borders and controlled territories .. Modern army ?! It's funny, or rather sad ...

[VO3A]

Look at the fighting in Syria and it's all there

And where did you get the information from? I have directly opposite ones ... UAVs fly only for reconnaissance with recording on a carrier and decryption after landing, Tu-214R works in the same mode, moreover, the real-time reconnaissance mode with target designation is not used there, although there is, but its army I haven't bought ... Enough? ... Wanting and being able are not the same thing ...

[air defense]

Enough? ...

Why continue if you want to cry, I do not insist. Only the results are on the face, in Syria, Assad broke from an outsider into a leader.

[VO3A]

He does not control a third of the territory, mainly with oil ... The war has moved into a sluggish current phase, time is lost, new players and their sponsors have actually mothballed the situation ... We do not exercise any informational control over the entire territory of Syria in real time. .. We cannot, we do not know how, there are no means and opportunities ... We do not control the situation anywhere! Are you satisfied with this state of affairs?
Children crying in the sandbox ... Crying from 41 to 45, what are you crying about?

[air defense]

We do not control the situation anywhere! Are you satisfied with this state of affairs?

Before the accession of Russia, Assad sat surrounded in Damascus and everyone kept repeating in chorus "Assad must leave", now Assad controls most of Syria, what are you crying about?
Of course, Russia is not a leader in the use of submarines, etc., but it does not stand still.

[VO3A]

Is your head okay? Why do I need a commercial for idiots? It would be better not to show it! Is the ESD-30 developed in 1957 used to power the control point? Everything is direct-fire within sight ... Are you kidding?
The second video is generally controversial and there is no artillery at all ... For the kids at school, it can and will pass for you ...

[air defense]

Is your head okay? Why do I need a commercial for idiots?
And what is there for idiots, may I ask? I still see an unreasonable hysteria in the spirit of everything is gone, while Russia is conducting an extremely successful military campaign in Syria.

Is the ESD-30 developed in 1957 used to power the control point?
This is the main claim, as I understand it.

Everything is direct-fire within sight ... Are you kidding?
What exactly is shooting, do not understand?


The second video is generally controversial and there is no artillery at all ... For the kids at school, it can and will pass for you ...
I agree not nice when illusions dispelled.

[BDRM 667]

We have designed and manufactured a nano-UAV weighing 180 grams.

"Nano", and the weight is 180 grams? How many nano-particles have been shoved there?

Nanoparticle (eng.nanoparticle) - an isolated solid-phase object with a distinct boundary with the environment, whose dimensions in all three dimensions are from 1 to 100 nm.

The buzzword is "Nano" ... Chubais loves him. Under it, any cut can be carried out with "Hurray" ...

[halpat]

Quote: BDRM 667

We have designed and manufactured a nano-UAV weighing 180 grams.

"Nano", and the weight is 180 grams? How many nano-particles have been shoved there?

Answer: There is a mustache - nano. Entirely :))
I'm wondering. It is so light, but if there is a gust of wind or some rain or snow flakes, what then?

[BDRM 667]

Quote: Halpat

Answer: There is a mustache - nano. Entirely :))

From "Nano", as it used to be with "3D", down to "3D tiles" laid by Gaster on the bathroom floor , the term is poked everywhere ...

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

Quote: Halpat

I'm wondering. It is so light, but if there is a gust of wind or some rain or snow flakes, what then?

All-weather nano-drone under development))

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Yes, at such a pace, a soldier will soon either carry a wheelbarrow with equipment along with him, or run with a small car!

Be in trend, Leader - nano-wheelbarrow!
And not a "small", but a nano-caliber gun!

[Svetlana]

Yes, they do, because modernization begins with such proposals. They first propose, then discuss, consider and then make decisions. And the decisions themselves can be both for and against.
And the more innovative "proposals", the better.

[vvnab]

... a soldier will soon either carry a wheelbarrow with equipment

So what about exoskeletons !? ))

[unhappy]

It makes more sense to give a drone to every tank or behe!
The barmaley sits in ambush, and then a big fly flies from above))

[Herman 4223]

It does not interfere.

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

the company has proactively developed a nano-drone for the "soldiers of the future."

embarrassed to ask: why "nano"?

[barin]

Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.

embarrassed to ask: why "nano"?

Everyone wants to be trendy

[BDRM 667]

Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.

embarrassed to ask: why "nano"?

Because because ... Under "nano" you can ask for more from the budget, and it is easier to write off.
How not to remember (Video):

[Kasta]

You are always not happy with everything ... now you got to the bottom of the words, there would be no essentially what to say

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

Quote: Kasta

You are always not happy with everything ...

why is it "not happy"? It is clear to everyone that all sorts of drones and remote gizmos are a hit these days.

[KVU-NSVD]

Until there are batteries capable of "holding" the exoskeleton for at least half a day of activity, nothing fundamentally new can be put on a soldier.

[Phoenix]

I advise you to study information about promising carbon batteries.

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

Just think - some five years have passed since the CoD Advanced Warfare series ... True, there was a fly drone, but this is a matter of time)

[Phoenix]

Give nano-tanks, nano-missiles and nano-psychic nano-disorder to nano-officials from the defense industry ... Well, well, well, but no.
And if it's the case, this design makes the machine a little more noticeable and noisy than the American Black Hornets with one larger propeller and a miniature body. 180 grams for a miniature UAV seems a bit too much ...

[orionvitt]

nano drone

With their "nano", they got it frankly. Especially after Chubais. Where is nano, and where is drones. Would write already correctly that "mini", and not "nano". Sorry, the ear cuts, shove this "nano", where not too lazy. Like if "nano", then "varnishes up", this is the last scientific peep.

[Alien From]

The word "nano" smells like something bad ...

[Izotovp]

Mini, nano ... that's when there will be a shot from a grenade launcher with at least a dozen drones ...

[sen]

For comparison.
The Israeli company SpearUAV has presented the pocket reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicle Ninox 40. According to Jane's, the new device is located in a cylindrical capsule from which it is launched. After reconnaissance, the operator can pick up the drone and later reuse or abandon it.
The Ninox 40 is a small quadcopter with retractable shoulders and propellers. The drone is capable of flying up to 40 minutes. The device weighs 250 grams.
Ninox 40 is located in a capsule through which the operator can program it, assigning a flight route or determining key points for observation. The drone can also be operated manually. Together with the device comes a tablet, which receives intelligence information, and two joysticks for control. They are attached to the sides of the tablet.

[Galleon]

Equipment "Ratnik" will be supplemented with a nano-drone

Yeah, who will fly and see at nanoscale.
It may be a good thing, but to wrap it up in a cheap slogan that betrays an illiterate use of technical terminology? Or is our goal propaganda from every electrical appliance?