Military Review

ICBMs and SLBMs "Pukkykson-4A": in Pyongyang showed new ballistic missiles

65
ICBMs and SLBMs "Pukkykson-4A": in Pyongyang showed new ballistic missiles

Pyongyang hosted a grand military parade in honor of the 75th anniversary of the Workers' Party of Korea on Saturday evening, celebrated in the DPRK on October 10. During the event, new military equipment and weapons were shown, including the latest examples of ballistic missiles.


Foreigners were not allowed to the parade, including diplomats in the country, all foreigners were strongly discouraged from approaching the central square of Pyongyang. However, the DPRK leadership promised to show the recording of the event on television. Before the parade, the leader of the DPRK, Kim Jong-un, traditionally addressed the North Korean people. In total, the event took more than 2 hours.

As noted by the South Korean military, who closely followed the parade, during the event in Pyongyang, North Korea demonstrated new models of ballistic missiles and MLRS. The so-called "super-large MLRS", "large-caliber guided MLRS", as well as a short-range ballistic missile of the "Iskander" type, which were tested in 2019-2020, were seen in the columns of the equipment.


Particular attention was drawn to the newest intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), which had no name on board. In terms of its size, it is larger than the known latest modification of the Hwaseong-15 ICBM and, presumably, has a range exceeding 13 km. Also on display was the new Pukkykson-4A SLBM (submarine ballistic missile).


The Pentagon has already reacted to the new North Korean missiles and promised to "study them thoroughly."


In the column of armored vehicles, both the already demonstrated samples and new equipment were shown. A new self-propelled gun or a wheeled tank based on the modernized BTR-80 attracted attention. A kind of howitzer of caliber from 100 to 122 mm is installed on it as a weapon, it is not precisely established. This technique has not been demonstrated previously.


According to military experts who have already studied the video of the parade, the bulk of the equipment and weapons of the North Korean army are clones or analogs of already released Chinese-made weapons. This mainly applies to the equipment of soldiers, armored vehicles, air defense systems. The DPRK army is gradually getting rid of obsolete Soviet-made models, replacing them with more modern weapons, created either independently or with the help of China.






65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alien From
    Alien From 11 October 2020 10: 17
    +3
    The Koreans asked the mattresses to work ..)
    1. Hypertension
      Hypertension 11 October 2020 13: 48
      -7
      It is not clear how the United States tolerates all this. Here either a bluff from the DPRK, or my options are running out. Well, can't the Americans calmly follow all this and do nothing? After all, this "Ynovskoe rifle", according to the laws of the genre, will someday shoot. And when it fires, no one will have fun ...
      1. strelokmira
        strelokmira 11 October 2020 15: 00
        0
        Here either a bluff from the DPRK, or my options are running out.

        Bluff of course, but if they start doing something and an unpleasant nuclear surprise can fly in, so all that remains is to look and bite your elbows hi
      2. Alex777
        Alex777 11 October 2020 16: 09
        +3
        It is not clear how the United States tolerates all this ...
        Well, can't the Americans calmly follow all this and do nothing?

        Do you believe in powerful US goodwill? Hail on the hill? lol
        Mom: "Father, can you imagine, I was summoned to school and told that our son is a masochist! Do something!"
        Dad: "What do you want me to do? Should I whip him or something?"

        And they cannot do anything.
        All US bases are within reach of the DPRK MLRS.
        Don't wake up dashing while it is quiet. That's what it's called.
        And they don't have any missile defense system there and there is no point in building it.
        The Republic of Kazakhstan and the USA will fight off 10 missiles. And from 1000 - nothing will help.
        1. Hypertension
          Hypertension 11 October 2020 16: 19
          -1
          Quote: Alex777
          Do you believe in powerful US goodwill?

          Just the opposite. Americans always try to stop threats to their country, but here they behave somehow sluggishly. Not like them. It's a dark matter.
          Quote: Alex777
          Don't wake up dashing while it is quiet. That's what it's called.

          If nothing is done now, then it will only get worse for the United States. Other countries will start raising their heads. It's all strange ...
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 11 October 2020 16: 58
            +2
            If nothing is done now, then it will only get worse for the United States.

            So let them get worse. In the meantime, we will wait for the Zircons (for example) or what else is useful rivet. bully
            The United States cannot do anything with Eun. Eun does not have bulk, Khodorkovsky, Tikhanovsky, and other 5 columns.
            Just ask what the DPRK has on the contact line.
            How far it shoots and where is Seoul and the US bases.
            Stop writing puzzled posts right away. hi
          2. smart fellow
            smart fellow 12 October 2020 08: 16
            0
            You are simply unfamiliar with the history of the issue.
            20.10.2006 | Source: Pravda.Ru
            A war with North Korea would have cost the United States 100 killed American soldiers and $ 100 billion in economic damage, Newsweek reported.
            The magazine cites calculations made at one time by the Bill Clinton administration, which abandoned plans for a military operation against the DPRK due to its high cost and inevitable huge losses.
            The publication reports that in 1994, Clinton and his Defense Secretary William Perry considered the possibility of starting a war against North Korea and requested relevant information from the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff of the US Armed Forces, General John Shalikashvili, and the commander of US forces in South Korea, General Gary Luck.
            During a report to the president at the White House on May 19 of that year, Shalikashvili and Luck told Clinton that 90 killed and wounded American soldiers should be expected during the first 52 days of the war, as well as 490 killed and wounded South Korean troops. At the same time, for American taxpayers, the cost of such a war with the DPRK, according to their data, would amount to $ 61 billion.
            The magazine also reports that General Luck subsequently clarified his calculations and came to the conclusion that the total losses for the United States and South Korea would amount to almost 1 million soldiers, including up to 100 thousand killed Americans.
            The total cost of the war with the DPRK for the US budget will amount to $ 100 billion, and the amount of economic damage to South Korea - more than $ 1 trillion, Newsweek writes, recalling that it is for these reasons that the Clinton administration abandoned the war with North Korea and entered into negotiations with Pyongyang ...
            Another option - the use of nuclear weapons was planned by the United States back in the Korean War: to drop atomic bombs on enemy troops, drop up to 6 atomic bombs on Pyongyang, cover the border with China with cobalt sand, etc. For various reasons, the plan was rejected, and the author MacArthur was dismissed.
            In 2013, a Virginia-class multipurpose nuclear submarine with nuclear cruise missiles was demonstratively practicing a strike on Pyongyang and other DPRK facilities. Because The Yellow Sea is shallow, then the entire South Korean fleet went out to sea to protect it from North Korean submarines. Pyongyang responded by saying that the Americans from the American military contingent in South Korea are regarded by it as hostages. When the situation aggravates, Washington will first of all evacuate its citizens from Kazakhstan, and there are about 100 thousand of them, not counting the military. The Koreans do not stand on ceremony with the Americans, thousands of American prisoners were shot during the withdrawal of KPA units to the territory of the PRC during the Korean War of 1950-1953.
            However, the Americans justify themselves by saying that Seoul will allegedly be destroyed by North Korean artillery. This is confirmed by all foreign experts, incl. and Russian. Although in my opinion this is sheer stupidity. Koreans also live in Seoul - why should Koreans from the North kill ordinary Koreans from the South if the official position of both sides is to unite people from both parts of the peninsula?
            1. Hypertension
              Hypertension 12 October 2020 13: 55
              -2
              Quote: smart fellow
              The publication reports that in 1994, Clinton and his Defense Secretary William Perry considered the possibility of starting a war against North Korea and requested relevant information from the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff of the US Armed Forces, General John Shalikashvili, and the commander of US forces in South Korea, General Gary Luck.

              Yes Yes. Clinton personally reported to the publication all this information. How, what and how much ... I do not feel any sympathy for amers, in terms of geopolitics, but if I were in their place, I would not have stood at the price and would have demolished the insane chubby. It is also not good for Russia to have a monkey with a grenade on the border. Who knows what he will think of tomorrow? Maybe he will start to create crap against the Russian Federation.
              1. smart fellow
                smart fellow 13 October 2020 14: 16
                0
                South Korea and Japan are opposed. How did you know he was insane?
                1. Hypertension
                  Hypertension 13 October 2020 17: 00
                  0
                  Quote: smart fellow
                  How did you know he was insane?

                  Duc, a reasonable one will not build a military fortress from his country and bristle with missiles, despite the fact that no one is going to conquer his homeland. There is no oil - you can not be afraid of amers. Slowly integrate with the South Caucasus, reduce the intensity of militarism, and in another generation, you will get a united Korea. But he is hooked on power and will not give it up so easily. The same king as Berdymukhamedov in Turkmenistan.
                  1. smart fellow
                    smart fellow 13 October 2020 20: 12
                    0
                    You are simply unfamiliar with the history of the issue.
                    The DPRK and the United States have signed a military ceasefire and the United States refuses to make peace. And the United States is still the most powerful military power on Earth.
        2. Boris Chernikov
          Boris Chernikov 11 October 2020 22: 00
          0
          there is more likely a question of expenses / income ... these are mountains ... the Americans will not get any sense from Korean coal, but it is easy to spend 4-6 trillion dollars for another military operation with not weak losses for themselves and 100% for the allies
      3. Boris Chernikov
        Boris Chernikov 11 October 2020 21: 58
        +1
        and what can the Americans do to them?
        1. Hypertension
          Hypertension 11 October 2020 23: 30
          0
          Quote: Boris Chernikov
          and what can the Americans do to them?

          I do not know. But logically, if they don't stop Eun now, then even more so. It doesn't look like amers it. They go to China, and bypass the DPRK. Something is wrong here ...
          1. Boris Chernikov
            Boris Chernikov 12 October 2020 13: 53
            0
            American businessmen .. they care about profit, but is there anyone who could create rockets for themselves ..
      4. Nosgoth
        Nosgoth 12 October 2020 04: 31
        +1
        Amers now have too many different goals around the world, and at the "remote location" (at home), their own "specialists" themselves organize a civil war.
  2. Graz
    Graz 11 October 2020 10: 17
    13
    and Eun successfully, I watch my army modernize, at least outwardly, I don't know how it all flies and shoots, but it makes an impression
    1. Doccor18
      Doccor18 11 October 2020 10: 35
      +9
      Everything is normal and flies and shoots. Large-scale exercises are regularly held in the missile forces, air defense and artillery, as well as interspecific exercises with real firing and the movement of large masses of troops at a distance of up to 100 km.
      The Republic of Korea would be tilted in a couple of weeks, if desired, and without US support. And the democrats know about this, and therefore do not rock the boat.
      1. chingachguc
        chingachguc 11 October 2020 11: 07
        -7
        no, I wouldn't tilt it))
    2. paul3390
      paul3390 11 October 2020 11: 02
      11
      I wonder how this fits in with the stories of our liberals about the prohibitively impoverished, illiterate DPRK, inhabited by a people who are cruelly suffering under the yoke of the tyrants of the Kims ..
      1. chingachguc
        chingachguc 11 October 2020 11: 10
        +5
        Well, it's really hard for them there ... the biggest problem is the chronic shortage of oil and electricity. The food problem was somehow solved. The DPRK's trouble is that it cannot offer the world adequate goods to buy what they really need.
        1. paul3390
          paul3390 11 October 2020 12: 05
          11
          Yes, they would have found goods - they are not allowed to trade .. Neither sell nor buy. Nevertheless - they somehow spin. I wonder what would happen if America was left to stew in its own bourgeois juice by way of the most severe blockade from the rest of the world and sanctions on any body movements ..
          1. chingachguc
            chingachguc 11 October 2020 12: 22
            0
            America, in principle, like Russia - only because of its size can create a self-sufficient economy. Not the best, of course, but quite viable. Small countries are incapable of this. Protect them - and degradation will begin. The DPRK is an example of the difficulties a small country faces in isolation. What they just do not do ... they threaten with missiles, and do drugs, and counterfeit money, and lure with their women - just to break this isolation and get currency.
            1. paul3390
              paul3390 11 October 2020 12: 25
              +7
              I don’t think so. For capitalism cannot survive without a continuously expanding market. He definitely needs to rob someone. And America's domestic market would end very soon .. And they would inevitably start robbing themselves, with all that it implies ..
              1. chingachguc
                chingachguc 11 October 2020 13: 08
                +1
                have already begun to rob themselves ... and here too ... and in Europe ... the middle class is rapidly disappearing. The world is divided into rich and poor.
                1. paul3390
                  paul3390 11 October 2020 13: 19
                  +2
                  Because the markets are over .. All the glades have already been divided, mastered and gutted. Further - either socialism or the Third World War ..
                  1. Alex777
                    Alex777 11 October 2020 16: 14
                    0
                    Socialism always comes after the war. Without her - nothing.
        2. 72jora72
          72jora72 11 October 2020 12: 13
          +7
          The DPRK's trouble is that it cannot offer the world adequate goods to buy what they really need.
          uranium, zirconium, tantalum, beryllium, lead and zinc, nickel, cobalt, tungsten, molybdenum. Ninety percent of North Korea's territory is rich in minerals.
          1. paul3390
            paul3390 11 October 2020 12: 26
            +2
            But alas, they are extremely poor in arable land. Hence their eternal problems with grub ..
          2. chingachguc
            chingachguc 11 October 2020 12: 36
            0
            but that doesn't make the weather. South Korea, export: ships, cars, electronics, household appliances, special equipment. Compare
            1. 72jora72
              72jora72 11 October 2020 13: 27
              +4
              ... South Korea, export: ships, cars, electronics, household appliances, special equipment. Compare
              You will be surprised, but until the early 80s, North Korea was ahead of South Korea in development. Under favorable conditions, an "economic miracle" is possible among the northerners ...
              PS. Russia exports a lot
              ships, cars, electronics, household appliances, special equipment
              ?
        3. Boris Chernikov
          Boris Chernikov 11 October 2020 22: 01
          0
          rather a bunch of sanctions
    3. Eldorado
      Eldorado 11 October 2020 11: 07
      +6
      The Koreans are also preparing to test their latest ballistic missile submarine. Presumably, it can carry up to 3 Pukkyksons. Thus, the mainland of the United States will become accessible to the DPRK.
      By the way, "Pukkykson" is a notable trolling of amers, since the name of the rocket is translated as "Polar Star". An obvious reference to the Americans who had their own "Polar Star" - "Polaris".
  3. smart fellow
    smart fellow 11 October 2020 10: 20
    +6
    Judging by the video, the foreigners were there. China dragged to what. The Chinese even limited the purchase of coal from the DPRK to the detriment of their steel companies. We looked at it, read it and did it on the Internet. An 11-axle tractor, for example, was made. China has banned the sale of 8-axle tractors to the DPRK, and the Koreans have made a 9-axle for the Hwaseong / Mars-15, and now an even heavier transporter.
    1. lucul
      lucul 11 October 2020 10: 59
      +8
      Judging by the video, the foreigners were there. China dragged to what. The Chinese even limited the purchase of coal from the DPRK to the detriment of their steel companies. We looked at it, read it and did it on the Internet. An 11-axle tractor, for example, was made. China has banned the sale of 8-axle tractors to the DPRK, and the Koreans have made a 9-axle for the Hwaseong / Mars-15, and now an even heavier transporter.

      That is, in fact, the DPRK's military industry is already more technologically advanced (according to many samples) than the Ukrainian industry. Much of what was shown, the Ukrainians can no longer do)))
      And everyone was making fun of the DPRK)))
      1. 72jora72
        72jora72 11 October 2020 12: 41
        +4
        That is, in fact, the DPRK's military industry is already more technologically advanced (by many samples) than the Ukrainian industry.
        North Korea has a historically well-developed chemical industry and metallurgy, not a bad engineering school. The problem with energy and access to high technology.
  4. chingachguc
    chingachguc 11 October 2020 10: 22
    -5
    A significant part of the equipment is camouflaged under false panels ... Super-super-missile, in my opinion, liquid-propellant, too healthy ... Korean missiles (any) have the main problem - the guidance system. All of their tests in the Pacific Ocean usually demonstrate that the rocket flies as it pleases. The howitzer is interesting ... it seems like it should be equipped with a BK automatic feeder, but nothing like that is visible ... everything is hidden under false panels. Most likely, the calculation during the shooting is selected upward. It seems like there is a platform for the calculation. But how they do not fall out there during the shot is completely incomprehensible)) and also amused the air defense system based on the BTR-60. In my opinion, a plywood fake. Guidance and detection systems are not visible. How the tower turns is not clear if a casing is attached at the back. And anyway, why did he give up? But the analogue of Iskander is real ...
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 11 October 2020 10: 46
      +1
      If about this, then this is not an air defense system, but the Korean version of the HJ-10/12. That is, the long-range ATGM 2 + / 3.



      Here's how the Chinese system works:


      Well, there is a duplicate classic of the 2nd generation - the Korean version of the Cornet.

      1. chingachguc
        chingachguc 11 October 2020 11: 03
        0
        the Chinese version - they have a radar on a separate installation. Three PU (battery) plus radar and possibly drones in the state.
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 11 October 2020 11: 12
          +1
          Well, here probably only PU was shown. Well, the radar is optional. On the manual - you need any control center of level 340 - the goal is the column. Then, through the cameras of the missiles themselves, select and hit.

          Well, a small UAV, like the Orbiter, is very desirable to have.
          1. chingachguc
            chingachguc 11 October 2020 11: 50
            -2
            we at one time, too, dragged dummies to parades ... Koreans think even more of ours are letting go. Inflating their cheeks is a vital necessity for them.

            1. donavi49
              donavi49 11 October 2020 11: 57
              +2
              Well, a lot of things are clearly not a fake.


              Well, what's the problem with making an ATGM with a camera and a coil of wire? Moreover, they probably swung not at Spike, but at the Chinese HJ-10, which can be closer and touched, and consultations can be obtained, or even purchase technology + equipment.

              Even Iran does that. Why can't Kim?
    2. mark1
      mark1 11 October 2020 11: 18
      +2
      Quote: chingachguc
      The howitzer is interesting ...

      Interesting - the tower is uninhabited and for some reason an ejector is installed on the barrel.
      1. Boris Chernikov
        Boris Chernikov 11 October 2020 22: 05
        0
        maybe they put barrels from old tanks
  5. Kerensky
    Kerensky 11 October 2020 10: 42
    +1
    Does anyone have a link to their catalog of orders - medals? There seems to be only a conductor without awards. Not local?
  6. Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 11 October 2020 10: 55
    16
    Can the directors and operators of the Victory Parades in Moscow be sent to study in Pyongyang? North Koreans have a cut of directors. And then they completely forgot how to shoot parades ... The Serebryannikovs are rear-wheel drive.
    1. SaLaR
      SaLaR 11 October 2020 20: 07
      +3
      I totally agree ..... Really beautiful and competently filmed .. in general, probably the most beautiful parade this year ..
  7. dima314
    dima314 11 October 2020 10: 59
    +7
    the show is impressive! Until recently, they demonstrated miserable alterations of outdated Soviet technology, but now the emphasis is on jet technology of very different sizes, it even seems that there is too much variety in missiles. amazes with the abundance of different chassis for rocket launchers! There are probably many supplies from China, but there must be something of its own! In short, five years ago the parade looked miserable, but now, at least outwardly, it is very modern and impressive!
    1. chingachguc
      chingachguc 11 October 2020 11: 06
      +1
      the north have always had an emphasis on missiles
  8. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 11 October 2020 11: 26
    0
    Where does Kim get the money for all this? The country is under wild sanctions and restrictions, agriculture does not even cover its needs, resources (even without taking into account the sanctions) will not weld much, because there are not so many resources themselves, and the territory is with gulkin pepper. Of course, there is a certain gesheft from the sale of weapons and (probably) technologies, but it would be a paradox - that part of the defense industry, due to sales over the hill, covers the entire defense industry and R&D and obviously hard-to-find programs such as large missiles and Ya.O.

    Of course, China is helping them (which is also a paradox, because China is, in general, their competitor in the sale of weapons and most industrial products) - but the PRC now has its own active rearmament and military construction, and space ambitions and trade with the United States - pouring a lot (and there is not just a lot, but a VERY much) for Kim to duplicate developments is a very strange task ..
  9. Anton Yu
    Anton Yu 11 October 2020 11: 26
    -2
    how many of them will reach the target?
  10. Region-25.rus
    Region-25.rus 11 October 2020 11: 37
    +7
    I looked, looked and could not understand - what was wrong? Then doper - the front step was changed !!! It used to be with some kind of bouncing! And here, like our classics!
  11. rocket757
    rocket757 11 October 2020 11: 50
    +4
    Everything is too closed to understand how their economy really works ... and without this, no big guns, rockets, is not an indicator of anything.
    Their deeds are not for us to judge.
  12. nnm
    nnm 11 October 2020 12: 04
    0
    Some sources noticed that they write that this is an ICBM with 2-3 warheads. The Japanese are no longer so weak.
  13. aszzz888
    aszzz888 11 October 2020 12: 07
    0
    Pyongyang hosted a grand military parade in honor of the 75th anniversary of the Workers' Party of Korea on Saturday evening, celebrated in the DPRK on October 10.
    Eun was beaming on the podium. He loves military equipment, especially missiles. And they already fly quite far. wink
  14. Piramidon
    Piramidon 11 October 2020 12: 21
    -4
    I wonder what chassis this device is on. Has Eun mastered the production of eleven-axle platforms. Doubtful.
    1. smart fellow
      smart fellow 12 October 2020 10: 31
      0
      Doubtfully
      Well then, can we assume that the United States delivered? For Russia, they are produced by MZKT in Belarus, and there is also a production in China, where they are used as timber trucks and mobile platforms for BR. But the tractors are 8-axle.
      The Korean ones are modified on the basis of the special 2010-axle tractors WS-8 from the Chinese company Wanshan Special Vehicle purchased in China in 52100 with a carrying capacity of 80 tons and a dead weight of 42 tons. A total of 8 cars were purchased, after which Beijing banned their sale to the DPRK.
      On the 9-axle conveyor for Hwaseong-15, the 9th additional section is allocated, which apparently was finished. The 11-axle tractor was already configured in this way. The weight of Hwaseong-15 is then from 80+ to 90t. Accordingly, the weight of the new rocket is up to 110 tons.
  15. The eye of the crying
    The eye of the crying 11 October 2020 12: 29
    0
    wheeled tank based on the modernized BTR-80


    A wheeled tank based on an armored personnel carrier. The essence of North Korea.
  16. Operator
    Operator 11 October 2020 12: 49
    0
    Damn, the North Koreans have abandoned the Chinese jumping combat step in favor of the Russian classic combat step, as well as from the Chinese dress tunics with turn-down collars in favor of the Russian dress tunics with stand-up collars.

    What would it mean? laughing
  17. Pavel57
    Pavel57 11 October 2020 12: 53
    0
    Where are the marching women in evening uniform?
  18. ZEMCH
    ZEMCH 11 October 2020 13: 24
    +3
    We changed the shape and the drill step))) they shoot beautifully)))
    By technique - a lot of them are covered with false panels
  19. Laksamana besar
    Laksamana besar 11 October 2020 13: 59
    +1
    They also know how to come up with names: "Pukkykson" (북극성 [buggeugseong]) - "Polar Star". smile
  20. Old26
    Old26 11 October 2020 16: 05
    +2
    Quote: Doccor18
    Everything is normal and flies and shoots ..

    to fly then flies, but how much - no one knows. The North Koreans, not having a KIK fleet, are forced to launch launches not at full range, but along high-altitude trajectories. The height is large, the range is relatively short
    It fires rockets along a "red", not a "black" trajectory.


    Below are the trajectories of "Hwaseong-14" and "Hwaseong-15"


    Quote: paul3390
    I wonder how this fits in with the stories of our liberals about the prohibitively impoverished, illiterate DPRK, inhabited by a people who are cruelly suffering under the yoke of the tyrants of the Kims ..

    But it is difficult to call North Korea rich and prosperous. Still, with their products it is quite difficult. Of course there are "showcases" - Pyongyang and some others, with shops in which an ordinary Korean can hardly buy anything, only foreigners (due to the high cost)

    Quote: chingachguc
    Well, it's really hard for them there ... the biggest problem is the chronic shortage of oil and electricity. The food problem was somehow solved. The DPRK's trouble is that it cannot offer the world adequate goods to buy what they really need.

    Yes, they did not solve the food problem. I don’t know how this year, but last time the daily rate was cut again. Became 300-310 g of cereals (rice and other) per day. Before that there was EMNIP 350-370 g

    Quote: El Dorado
    The Koreans are also preparing to test their latest ballistic missile submarine. Presumably, it can carry up to 3 Pukkyksons. Thus, the mainland of the United States will become accessible to the DPRK.
    By the way, "Pukkykson" is a notable trolling of amers, since the name of the rocket is translated as "Polar Star". An obvious reference to the Americans who had their own "Polar Star" - "Polaris".

    What this boat will look like is not yet known. There were several photographs (with some blurred details) of fragments of a boat in the hangar. so the mainland of the United States is safe for now. Moreover, the performance characteristics are unknown, if only due to the fact that it is not known about its test launches.
    And trolling is really noble with a name

    Quote: donavi49
    If about this, then this is not an air defense system, but the Korean version of the HJ-10/12. That is, the long-range ATGM 2 + / 3.



    It is said to be the North Korean version of Spike NLOS. Although it would be more accurate to say that this is the North Korean version of the Chinese HJ

    Quote: Anton Yu
    how many of them will reach the target?

    And in this there is a great secret. The maximum range that Hwasong-15 flew, declared that she had a range of 13 km, so this is 000 km

    Quote: nnm
    Some sources noticed that they write that this is an ICBM with 2-3 warheads. The Japanese are no longer so weak.

    Theoretically, 2-3 BGs can be shoved there. The diameter of Hwaseong-16 is already 3 meters, that's just not a single test, not just with 2-3 BG, but even Hwaseong-16 was not

    Quote: Piramidon
    I wonder what chassis this device is on. Has Eun mastered the production of eleven-axle platforms. Doubtful.

    Before that, they bought 8-axle WS-51200 from the Chinese. at the very least, but they have some kind of auto industry, copied, modified and released in several copies
  21. Old26
    Old26 11 October 2020 16: 08
    0
    Quote: paul3390
    Yes, they would have found goods - they are not allowed to trade .. Neither sell nor buy. Nevertheless - they somehow spin. I wonder what would happen if America was left to stew in its own bourgeois juice by way of the most severe blockade from the rest of the world and sanctions on any body movements ..

    They are not allowed to trade in goods from the UN sanctions lists, and not in general. They can also buy. Again, only those goods that are not included in the sanctions lists. And these are products used in the aviation industry, rocket and nuclear industries. Oil is limited in volumes too
  22. Comrade Kim
    Comrade Kim 12 October 2020 00: 51
    +2
    Quote: chingachguc
    no, I wouldn't tilt it))

    Wrong.
    There is no fifth column in the DPRK.
    The army is at its peak.
    The people and the Leader are one.