Military Review

Human-controlled torpedoes Chariot. Successful failures

25

General view of the torpedo Chariot Mk I


In 1942, the special forces of the Royal Navy of Great Britain entered the newest human-guided torpedoes / ultra-small submarines of the Chariot type. This technique was intended for sabotage and covert destruction of enemy ships in ports and on raids. For a number of reasons, the results of its use have been mixed.

Underwater "chariots"


The idea of ​​a human-guided torpedo appeared in Great Britain before the war, but did not receive the required support in the early years. Only in 1941, after several successful attacks by Italian combat swimmers, the British command ordered the development of their own samples of this kind. The first "torpedo" was named Chariot Mk I ("Chariot", type 1).

The Chariot Mk I had a cylindrical body 6,8 m long, 0,8 m in diameter and weighed less than 1600 kg. The head fairing held 272 kg of explosive and could be dropped for suspension under the bottom of the target ship. In the center of the hull there was a battery and a ballast tank, and outside there were two places for combat swimmers with a control station and boxes for various equipment and tools. In the stern were an engine with a propeller and rudders.

Human-controlled torpedoes Chariot. Successful failures
Torpedo without charging compartment

The crew of two received special diving suits that provided the necessary protection and ease of work with a minimum weight. Closed-loop breathing apparatus were also developed, which made it possible to stay under water for 5-6 hours. The actual range of the torpedo was determined precisely by the characteristics of the breathing apparatus.

It was proposed to deliver the Chariots to the area of ​​the combat mission using boats or other vessels, submarines or seaplanes. The latter option was rejected almost immediately. In real operations, boats and submarines were used. The latter were equipped with special containers for the transport of torpedoes; preparation for sailing could be carried out on the surface and underwater.

By the end of 1942, an improved torpedo submarine Chariot Mk II had been developed. She received a longer body with an extended charging compartment for 680 kg of explosives. Two places for swimmers fit inside the body; if necessary, they were protected by a light transparent lantern. Later, based on the Mk II, the Mk III was developed with the same architecture, but with improved characteristics.

First failures


The first combat operation with the participation of the Chariot Mk I started on October 26, 1942 and was named Title. With the help of a fishing boat, two ultra-small submarines were to go to the Norwegian fjords, where the German battleship Tirpitz was located. Before the last stage of the campaign to the target area, both "Chariots" were lowered from the deck into the water and attached under the bottom of the boat. On the route, the boat got into a storm, as a result of which the torpedoes were blown off - the operation had to be stopped.


At the end of December, Operation Principal was launched in Malta, which involved eight human-guided torpedoes, 16 combat swimmers and three carrier submarines. On the way to Palermo, the submarine HMS P-311 was blown up by a mine and sank, after which the attack had to be carried out in a reduced order - the forces of the HMS Thunderbolt and HMS Trooper boats, as well as the torpedoes on them.

Shortly after launching, a battery on a torpedo with tactical number XV exploded, killing the commander. The second swimmer was later captured. On the way to the port, one of the swimmers on torpedo XXIII lost his breathing apparatus. The commander left him on the surface and set off on his own to carry out a combat mission. He did not manage to get to the harbor, after which he returned for a friend. They were soon picked up by a submarine. Another crew tried to go to the shore, but the rudders jammed at the torpedo - it had to be flooded.

Only two torpedoes were able to penetrate the port of Palermo and place the charges. The main ammunition lay under the light cruiser Ulpio Traiano and the Viminale transport. The compact charges have been installed on several other boats and ships. On the way back, the engines of both torpedoes failed, because of which the swimmers had to abandon them and go to the shore on their own.

After an unsuccessful raid on Palermo, only two Chariot products remained in service in Malta. Already on January 18, a new attack was carried out - on the port of Tripoli. The HMS Thunderbolt submarine delivered the torpedoes to the target point again and launched them into the water. On one of the torpedoes, the rudders almost immediately failed. The crew had to swim to the shore and hide from the enemy. A second pair of saboteurs hit the port and blew up the Guilio transport. Almost simultaneously with this, the Germans flooded the ships at the entrance to the port, because of which the combat swimmers could not return to the submarine and went ashore.


"Chariot" on the surface

Modest successes


In May and June, before the Allied landings in Sicily, human-guided torpedoes were used for reconnaissance. With their help, the swimmers secretly crept up to the given objects and conducted observation. The nature of such operations made it possible to do without losses: even in the most difficult situations, the scouts could return to the carrier submarine.

On June 21, 1944, British saboteurs launched Operation QWZ. It is curious that Italian combat swimmers from the 10th flotilla MAC sided with the Coalition. The 10th Flotilla provided several boats, and the crews of two man-guided torpedoes participated from the KVMF.

On the same day, saboteurs arrived at the port of La Spezia and launched the Charion into the water. One of the crews was able to mine the cruiser Bolzano, but on the return move, their torpedo ran out of batteries. The second pair of swimmers immediately faced technical difficulties, but tried to break through to the goal. As a result, both torpedoes were flooded, and the soldiers had to go ashore.

In April 1945, Chariot Mk Is were used for Operation Toast, which aimed to sink the unfinished aircraft carrier Aquila in Genoa. The KVMF provided two torpedoes, the crews for which were recruited from Italians. One of the submarines was unable to reach the port, and the crew of the second failed to hang the charge under the target - it was laid to the bottom. Soon the torpedo returned to the carrier boat, and a few hours later there was an explosion. The ship was damaged, but did not sink.


The process of installing a warhead on a ship

The only completely successful Chariot operation is considered to be a raid on the port of Phuket in late October 1944, which used two Chariot Mk II submarines. The submarine HMS Trenchant delivered them to the area of ​​the combat mission, after which they managed to reach the target, mine two transport ships and successfully return to the carrier.

Reasons for failure


From 1942 to 1945, two modifications of the Chariot human-guided torpedoes were involved in less than a dozen operations. They managed to sink or seriously damage no more than 8-10 ships, ships and boats. At the same time, most of the torpedoes had to be thrown and flooded at one stage or another of the combat work. In addition, 16 combat swimmers were killed (including on board the HMS P-311) and several people were captured. Such results cannot be called outstanding, and they show the generally low combat effectiveness of the Chariots.

Looking at the progress and results of the operations, you can see why the British midget submarines showed unsatisfactory results. So, the first failure of the mission was associated with the unsuccessful organization of the raid. The fishing boat turned out to be a poor carrier of human-controlled torpedoes and lost them in the storm. Subsequently, submarines and specialized boats were used - with positive results.


Carrier submarine with containers and human-guided torpedoes

The most common reason for the failure of a task at one stage or another was problems with batteries or motors, even the most serious ones. The rudders failed several times. At the same time, there were no serious problems with navigation and other devices. The personal equipment of combat swimmers generally performed well, with the exception of isolated incidents with breathing apparatus.

It should be noted that in the absence of technical difficulties at the first stages of the operation, the saboteurs had every chance to pass through the obstacles, reach the target, install a warhead on it and leave. Not once did the enemy manage to notice human-controlled torpedoes in time and take action.

Ambiguous results


The Chariot Mk I project in its original form was developed in a hurry and with an eye on the foreign model. This led to well-known negative consequences: torpedoes required special carriers, did not differ in high tactical and technical characteristics and were not sufficiently reliable. However, the negative influence of these factors was able to be reduced due to competent planning of operations, correct use of technology, as well as the skill and courage of combat swimmers. In the future, the experience of the not very successful torpedo of the first type was used to create more advanced modifications of the Mk II and Mk III.

As a result, the "Chariots" of all types were not the most numerous and widespread technique of the KVMF, but they also managed to make a small contribution to the victory over the enemy. In addition, the experience of their development and operation, positive and negative, became the basis for the further development of special equipment for combat swimmers.
Author:
Photos used:
UK Imperial War Museum, Wiki.wargaming.net
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Egoza
    Egoza 10 October 2020 07: 14
    +4
    An interesting page in history. Thanks to the author.
  2. Mister X
    Mister X 10 October 2020 09: 05
    +1
    The main ammunition lay under the light cruiser Ulpio Traiano and the Viminale transport.
    Author: Kirill Ryabov

    After a failed raid on Palermo

    So, according to the author's version, the cruiser and transport survived ?!
    1. Catfish
      Catfish 10 October 2020 16: 26
      +3
      Michael, hello! hi
      As far as I remember, this unfinished cruiser was torn in two by an explosion, which sank. The ship was never completed, but the "wreckage" was excluded from the fleet only in 1947. The ship was of the same project (Capitani Romani) as our leader Tashkent, built there.

      The transport was seriously damaged, but did not sink.
      1. Mister X
        Mister X 11 October 2020 13: 50
        +1
        Hi Constantine! hi
        I read about Ulpio's demise, but on a third-party resource.
        It's strange that the author missed this point ...
        There was an understatement wink
        1. Catfish
          Catfish 11 October 2020 19: 32
          0
          And what kind of resource, Mikhail? And then I only graze here, on VO. drinks
          1. Mister X
            Mister X 11 October 2020 21: 12
            +1
            Quote: Sea Cat
            And what kind of resource, Mikhail?

            http://navyworld.narod.ru/Incrociatori.htm#Ulpio_Traiano
            1. Catfish
              Catfish 11 October 2020 21: 13
              +1
              Thanks for the night to do. smile
              1. Mister X
                Mister X 11 October 2020 21: 28
                +1
                Quote: Sea Cat
                Thank you

                Please
  3. TermNachTer
    TermNachTer 10 October 2020 09: 26
    +5
    With all due respect to the author. Human torpedoes and ultra-small submarines are completely different things. The man-torpedo crew is outside, "riding" on the torpedo. The SMPL crew is inside the boat. And they differ considerably in size. By the way, the SMPLs were quite famous in the Royal. For the attack on Tirpitz, two SMPL commanders received a VC.
  4. Disorder
    Disorder 10 October 2020 10: 00
    +3
    I will just give an excerpt from Valerio Borghese's book "The Tenth Flotilla of the IAS".
    ....
    In the official lists of military losses published by the British Admiralty, one could notice the following:
    January 2, 1943 Palermo. Shariots XV – XVI – XIX – XXII – XXIII - 1.2 t.
    January 8, 1943 La Maddalena. Shariots X - XVIII - 1,2 t.
    January 19, 1943 Tripoli. Shariots XII – XIII –1,2 t.
    These Shariots were nothing more than guided torpedoes, listed with British precision and their displacement.
    Nothing is known about the actions in La Maddalena and in Tripoli; it remains to be assumed that 4 English guided torpedoes for unknown reasons disappeared into the sea together with their crews, without reaching their destination.
    On January 3, 1943, in accordance with a telegraphic order from the Ministry, I arrived in Palermo to participate in the investigation into the circumstances of the attack on the port carried out by assault means the previous night.
    Of the 5 guided torpedoes that took part in the operation, 2 died at sea, not yet reaching the port. Three reached the port and overcame the network barriers. The crews of two torpedoes attached their charges to the hull of the light cruiser Ulpio Traiano with a displacement of 3300 tons, which was under construction. The explosion of great force destroyed the light metal hull of the ship, but it continued to rise above the water, since the depth in this place is shallow. The crew of the third torpedo attached the charge under the propellers of the merchant ship Viminal. The explosion, however, caused minor damage to the vessel. A few days later, "Vimal" could already leave the port and go to another place for repairs.
    The British torpedo drivers attached small charges to the hulls of several small vessels, but due to a malfunction of the fuses, they did not explode and were removed by our divers.
    All the British (6 people) who had penetrated the port were taken prisoner a few hours after they went ashore. Three torpedoes, which did not have a self-destruct mechanism, were fished out and carefully examined. It turned out that they are an imitation of our first "Mayali", without any improvements. The equipment of their drivers had many very serious technical flaws: in particular, the rubber overalls, which, unlike ours, completely covered their heads, were made very poorly, and perhaps this was the main reason for the high mortality rate among English drivers. I devoted several days to the interrogation of six prisoners. Despite the fact that the prisoners were very taciturn and none of them was going to betray the secret, after long conversations with them I still managed to get some useful information.
    It turned out that the British, after our first fruitless attempts to attack Gibraltar, got from the bottom the wreckage of one of our guided torpedoes (perhaps the Birindelli torpedo) and built exactly the same one.
    ....
  5. Sancho_SP
    Sancho_SP 10 October 2020 10: 01
    +3
    And yet they are not torpedoes, but something like underwater scooters. The torpedo collides with the target entirely, but here it is just a transport of saboteurs.
  6. sidoroff
    sidoroff 10 October 2020 10: 15
    0
    Dr. Abst approves of human torpedoes.
    1. Macsen_wledig
      Macsen_wledig 10 October 2020 11: 16
      +2
      Quote: sidoroff
      Dr. Abst approves of human torpedoes.

      Kirill Kartsov is strongly against it. :)
  7. Undecim
    Undecim 10 October 2020 12: 58
    +1
    human-guided torpedoes / Chariot-class submarines
    As already indicated in the comments, these are different types of weapons.
    In 1950, experiments were carried out on the use of an ultra-small submarine X-Craft as a carrier of two Chariot torpedoes.
  8. Lontus
    Lontus 10 October 2020 13: 09
    +2
    Novorossiysk was not blown up when using this?
    1. Macsen_wledig
      Macsen_wledig 10 October 2020 13: 27
      0
      Quote: Lontus
      Novorossiysk was not blown up when using this?

      No one will ever know ...
      1. Lontus
        Lontus 10 October 2020 16: 46
        +1
        Quote: Macsen_Wledig
        Quote: Lontus
        Novorossiysk was not blown up when using this?

        No one will ever know ...

        never say never (c)
        1. Macsen_wledig
          Macsen_wledig 10 October 2020 18: 06
          0
          Quote: Lontus
          never say never (c)

          And what, there are prerequisites that someone is conclusively admitted? :)
          1. Essex62
            Essex62 13 October 2020 19: 19
            0
            Let's take a geyrope "on a sword" and dig into the archives ourselves.
  9. Undecim
    Undecim 10 October 2020 13: 21
    +3
    In the future, the experience of the not very successful torpedo of the first type was used to create more advanced modifications of the Mk II and Mk III.
    There were more modifications.
    1. Undecim
      Undecim 10 October 2020 13: 26
      +2

      The Mk III was followed by a one-seat modification.
      1. Undecim
        Undecim 10 October 2020 13: 31
        +4
        In the mid-60s, several of the remaining Chariot torpedoes were converted for use in mine clearance.
  10. Jager
    Jager 11 October 2020 14: 58
    0
    I read the article - it's just a holiday of diesel punk!
  11. Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 11 October 2020 17: 52
    0
    M-yes.
    I read somewhere about this ...
    It was hard impressions.
    This, I have not yet gone out to sea on them ...
  12. WayKheThuo
    WayKheThuo 11 October 2020 20: 47
    0
    On this occasion, there is a book "Waves Above Us" by Charles Warren and James Benson.
    I read it for a long time, but I learned the following for myself:
    1. Everything was very "raw" from a technical point of view.
    2. People prevailed.
    3. If the drivers of minisubmarines and / or torpedoes were captured when the mines were set, they were not beaten - they were given a blanket, hot tea or cognac (for officers) and put into the hold - right next to the place where the mines could be planted.
    4. Operations in Southeast Asia were very, very verified, due to the fact that the Japanese were not Germans and the captive sailors were simply boiled in boilers.
    So it goes.

    PS
    Thanks to the author for the article.