Experts: In case of protracted battles, Baku can offer the introduction of a Turkish peacekeeping contingent in Karabakh

82

The day before, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan made a statement in which he allowed the entry of a Russian peacekeeping contingent into Nagorno-Karabakh. According to him, this may happen due to the fact that hostilities have not stopped for the second week.

At the same time, it is important to note that during the week the Armenian side lost control over several settlements in the territories adjacent to the unrecognized NKR territories, de jure belonging to Azerbaijan.



According to Pashinyan, the deployment of peacekeepers is possible with a broad discussion in the format of the OSCE Minsk Group.

The journalists asked the press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov to comment on the possibility of introducing peacekeepers. According to the head of the Kremlin press service, the introduction of Russian peacekeepers into the zone of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is possible only if this step is supported by both Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Let us remind that earlier the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev stated unequivocally that the hostilities would stop only when the Armenian side withdraws its troops and equipment from the regions belonging to Azerbaijan, or is driven out of there. Aliyev did not speak about any introduction of a peacekeeping contingent. It can be assumed that if the Azerbaijani side continues to push the enemy troops, then Baku will not support the introduction of a peacekeeping contingent.

Against this background, experts suggest that in Baku, in the event of the transition of an armed conflict to a prolonged version with protracted battles, they can go to the introduction of peacekeepers with a proposal to include Turkish troops in such a contingent - with the creation of "observation points" of the Turkish armed forces for the same the principle that Ankara uses in Syria. This option, as noted, legitimizes the Turkish presence in the Caucasus and will add "headaches" to the Armenian side.

It should be recalled that earlier Ilham Aliyev called Turkey a fraternal country.
  • Facebook / Ministry of Defense of Turkey
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    4 October 2020 06: 47
    What are these "peacekeepers" thugs from Idlib or what?
    1. 0
      4 October 2020 08: 31
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      What are these "peacemakers"

      Belarusians can be asked.
      Ours are not neutral at all.
      And the Turks ...
      Mongols are good!
      Chinese (???)?
      1. +4
        4 October 2020 11: 41
        Belarusians can be asked.
        Ours are not neutral at all.


        Maybe Pashinyan will still appear "for the war"? Together with the armed forces of Armenia? This development of the conflict is solely his merit.
        It turns out somehow indecent. No countries are at war, no one has declared war as such, there is no trace of the Armenian army ... and you help. Who exactly?
        He is the president, the supreme one. The people "entrusted" their foreign policy to him. Go ahead, on a dashing horse ... Or let him go to hell, if he entrusts the affairs to other people's uncles. Then let the uncles decide the fate of the Armenians. They will decide quickly, but don't be offended. Zadolbali "independence" and "independence".
      2. -8
        4 October 2020 11: 52
        According to information from the news of Karabakh, Belarusian military pilots went to Azerbaijan to participate in hostilities as mercenaries. They also beat Stepanakert from the Belarusian Polonezes.
        1. 0
          4 October 2020 21: 07
          Quote: finish
          According to information from the news of Karabakh, Belarusian military pilots went to Azerbaijan to participate in hostilities as mercenaries. They also beat Stepanakert from the Belarusian Polonezes.

          ========
          WHERE did you get this information? "One grandmother said ..." ??? Spit in her face!
        2. +5
          5 October 2020 20: 35
          It's not good to lie!
    2. 0
      4 October 2020 12: 29
      They can offer something, but who will obey them?))))
    3. 0
      4 October 2020 13: 07
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      What are these "peacekeepers" thugs from Idlib or what?

      Uh-huh ... 21st century Bashibuzuki ...
    4. Maz
      -1
      4 October 2020 20: 09

      Flightradar clearly shows what filthy neutrality Israel and Georgia adhere to. Nekhai Israel introduces peacekeepers to Turkey and Azeybarjan - they will be very happy there, brotherly peoples. And They remember Mavi Marmara well. And the Jews will become famous as real peacemakers. Maybe they will even be less "loved" all over the world. I hope the etrog, the lulav, the myrtle, and the willow on the table under the sukkah will not give you the taste of the blood of Armenians and Azeibarjans. And you may still be able to become real righteous someday. But not right now. My wife told me so, and her father is not some sort of Jew, but a purebred Armenian. She grew up in the USSR and most of all grieves about its collapse, and from the bottom of her heart. And I think that the truth is speaking through her lips. And may you, gentlemen, re-elected, in your sukkah under the palm branches and leaves it will be at least not as bad as it is now for people in Ganja and Stepanokert. Their blood is on your hands too. And hardly anyone will forget it. Amen.
  2. -6
    4 October 2020 06: 48
    Such options are possible. Of course, they will reduce the intensity of passions, but they will not solve territorial issues.
    1. +17
      4 October 2020 06: 54
      Turks with their proxies will seriously reduce the intensity of passions? They will bring even more instability and tension to the region, on the one hand, Iran is nearby, and on the other, do not forget about our northern Caucasus.
    2. +1
      4 October 2020 07: 04
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Such options are possible. Of course, they will reduce the intensity of passions, but they will not solve territorial issues.

      That is why Azerbaijan will be against it.
    3. +6
      4 October 2020 08: 00
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Such options are possible.

      Is Turkey's consolidation in South Transcaucasia acceptable to you? Explain the expressed assumption more clearly ...
      1. -3
        4 October 2020 08: 13
        As usual, do you read my comments favorably and confuse the plural with the singular? You do not mind what I wrote options? That is, I mean the introduction of the peacekeeping forces of the Russian Federation?
        And speaking against the Russian peacekeepers is more expensive. 08.08.08 example.
        Or has Azerbaijan overshadowed your eyes?
        1. -2
          4 October 2020 08: 21
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          As usual, do you read my comments favorably and confuse the plural with the singular?

          Why ? It's just that your comment is at least controversial ...
    4. -2
      4 October 2020 13: 16
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Such options are possible. They, of course, will reduce the intensity of passions,

      What !? Have you heard about the "peacekeepers" in Kosovo?
      After the introduction of NATO peacekeeping forces, a wave of killings and destruction of Serbian religious and cultural sites swept across Kosovo. From June to December 1999, up to 200 Serbs, Montenegrins, Roma, etc. left the region. In Prizren, the number of Serbs dropped to 000 people, in Pristina to 11. According to the Serbian authorities, from June 300, 10 to March 1999, 30 in Kosovo, 2000 terrorist acts and attacks were committed, 4564 people were killed (of which 936 were Serbs and Montenegrins), 835 people were kidnapped (of which 867 were Serbs and Montenegrins). More than 824 houses were destroyed, most of which belonged to the non-Albanian population (Serbs, Montenegrins, Roma, etc.)

      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Косовская_война
  3. +11
    4 October 2020 06: 52
    Baku may propose the introduction of Turkish peacekeeping contingent in Karabakh

    It's like that joke
    In the zoo on the elephant's cage it is written that he eats 40 kilograms of bread, 30 kilograms of potatoes, 50 kilograms of cabbage, 20 kilograms of bananas ... One of the visitors asks an employee:
    - Tell me, will the elephant eat it all?
    - He will eat something, but who will give him ?!
    Whoever lets the Sultan go there, nobody (except Azerbaijanis) needs him there.
    1. +5
      4 October 2020 06: 55
      Quote: Ragnar Lothbrok
      Whoever lets the Sultan go there, nobody (except Azerbaijanis) needs him there.

      Belarusians can be asked.
      Ours are not neutral at all.
      And the Turks ...
      1. +4
        4 October 2020 07: 07
        Quote: Victor_B
        Quote: Ragnar Lothbrok
        Whoever lets the Sultan go there, nobody (except Azerbaijanis) needs him there.

        Belarusians can be asked.
        Ours are not neutral at all.
        And the Turks ...

        And the Kazakhs.
        This will be the real interaction.
        Admit Azerbaijan to the CSTO at the next stage.
        And then (after the change of power among timid Georgians) and Georgia, Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

        And peace and prosperity will come.
        1. 0
          4 October 2020 07: 18
          Kazakov ... No, you probably wanted to say - polite people (little green men, well, or whatever). As in the Crimea.
          1. KCA
            +2
            4 October 2020 07: 27
            When did the polite special forces become peacekeepers? They have several other tasks.
            1. 0
              4 October 2020 09: 51
              Quote: KCA
              When did the polite special forces become peacekeepers? They have several other tasks.

              You just can't imagine how flexible the "polite special forces" can be in their approaches to solving the assigned tasks feel
            2. 0
              4 October 2020 20: 05
              Quote: KCA
              When did the polite special forces become peacekeepers? They have several other tasks.

              And when did the SPN become polite, I wonder? laughing
          2. +5
            4 October 2020 07: 33
            Quote: 210ox
            Kazakov ... No, you probably wanted to say - polite people (little green men, well, or whatever). As in the Crimea.

            No. battalion of Russians (Russia), battalion of Belarusians (Belarus), battalion of Kazakhs (Kazakhstan). And 1 company of Kyrgyz and Tajiks.
            So it will be for everyone - both Christians and Muslims.
            1. -2
              4 October 2020 07: 42
              Quote: Halpat
              battalion of Russians (Russia), battalion of Belarusians (Belarus), battalion of Kazakhs (Kazakhstan). And 1 company of Kyrgyz and Tajiks.
              That will be for everyone - both Christians and Muslims

              The most ideal option
            2. +3
              4 October 2020 08: 15
              The Kyrgyz and Kazakhs are Turks - a potentially interested party. Mongols, Cubans and North Koreans - it will be much prettier.
              1. +2
                4 October 2020 10: 11
                Quote: mark1
                The Kyrgyz and Kazakhs are Turks - a potentially interested party. Mongols, Cubans and North Koreans - it will be much prettier.

                Well, Duc and Turks are Turks, and Tatars and Bashkirs and Yakuts, but not to count. Now what?
                1. +1
                  4 October 2020 11: 04
                  Quote: Halpat
                  Well, Duc and Turks are Turks, and Tatars and Bashkirs and Yakuts, but not to count. Now what?

                  So let them live for their own good, the main thing is not to create an additional potential source of problems in places remote from them, let the locals figure it out, and an unconditionally neutral third party pacifies them.
  4. +4
    4 October 2020 06: 53
    Experts: In case of protracted battles, Baku can offer the introduction of a Turkish peacekeeping contingent in Karabakh
    Peacekeepers are brought in by mutual agreement. Armenians will not agree to this in life. Turks are genocide for them, and nothing more.
    But peacekeepers will be needed, so let the experts fantasize about this more realistically.
    1. +5
      4 October 2020 07: 59
      And where do they want to bring peacekeepers ??? To the contact line? So Azerbaijan has made little progress on the territory of Karabakh. Turks are peacekeepers ??? Especially in the territory inhabited by Armenians.
    2. +1
      4 October 2020 09: 39
      Quote: Observer2014
      Peacekeepers are brought in by mutual agreement. Armenians will not agree to this in life. Turks are genocide for them, and nothing more.

      It is like declaring with a clever air that the Americans will not agree to the introduction of Chinese peacekeepers into Russian territory, because they do not like them.
    3. 0
      5 October 2020 05: 45
      Quote: Observer2014
      But peacekeepers will be needed.

      Who do you suggest? UN? There is only a lot of sound. Of all NATO, only the Turks want, it is clear why, but NATO did not give the fuck up. China? The Chinese base in the region is not needed by anyone, except, perhaps, the Chinese themselves. Russia, you see, is not entirely neutral (that is why both sides are demonstrating Russian technology). The Armenians will not want any Muslims, except maybe the Persians, but everyone else, and first of all the Turks, will not want the Persians. Who else is left? Blacks and Latinos? Well, these will put things in order. They can't put things in order for themselves, but here, then, they will?
  5. +4
    4 October 2020 06: 58
    Yes, they all consider themselves Turkish Azerbaijanis. And the GDP still considers Azerbaijan some kind of independent state in the sphere of influence of Russia. And before he can blink an eye, the Turks will take all positions there. As was the failed foreign policy and remained.
  6. +5
    4 October 2020 06: 59
    It is simply surprising that the Russian side is helpless in relation to the unbelted Turkey, Russia has completely lost control in the Transcaucasus, and Turkey, meanwhile, is crushing the entire region. It's only the beginning!
    1. +1
      4 October 2020 07: 05
      Quote: Alex Russia
      It is simply surprising that the Russian side is helpless in relation to the unbelted Turkey, Russia has completely lost control in the Transcaucasus, and Turkey, meanwhile, is crushing the entire region. It's only the beginning!

      Will you order to declare war on Turkey?
      1. +11
        4 October 2020 07: 09
        Of course not - Turkey needs to build a couple more free nuclear power plants and gas pipelines, and send 10 million more tourists to sponsor the Turkish military budget
        1. KCA
          -7
          4 October 2020 07: 33
          Which NPPs to whom? In this matter, you are simply below the plinth, well, there is no need to embarrass yourself, Russia is not building a nuclear power plant for Turkey, but in Turkey, Russia will be the owner and operator of the nuclear power plant in Akka from commissioning to full shutdown, Turkey will simply buy cheap electricity.
        2. 0
          4 October 2020 07: 40
          Quote: Alex Russia
          and 10 million more tourists to send

          Send by force?
          At the guns of the atoms?
          1. 0
            4 October 2020 10: 16
            Send by force?
            At the guns of the atoms?

            Well, bloody gebnya, she is. He does not spare either his own or others. He even sends tourists to Turkey.
        3. 0
          4 October 2020 08: 14
          Quote: Alex Russia
          Of course not - Turkey needs to build a couple more free nuclear power plants and gas pipelines, and send 10 million more tourists to sponsor the Turkish military budget

          Severing economic ties will not stop him - he has put too much on this war. Only force can apparently stop him.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        4 October 2020 20: 10
        Quote: 1976AG
        Quote: Alex Russia
        It is simply surprising that the Russian side is helpless in relation to the unbelted Turkey, Russia has completely lost control in the Transcaucasus, and Turkey, meanwhile, is crushing the entire region. It's only the beginning!

        Will you order to declare war on Turkey?

        Are you ready to obey the order?
    2. -2
      4 October 2020 07: 12
      Quote: Alex Russia
      It is simply surprising that the Russian side is helpless in relation to the unbelted Turkey, Russia has completely lost control in the Transcaucasus, and Turkey, meanwhile, is crushing the entire region. It's only the beginning!

      Come on.
      Right now, the General Staff is dimming as well as.
      1. -4
        4 October 2020 07: 19
        I hope not another free nuclear power plant is being prepared as a gift to the Sultan. laughing
    3. +3
      4 October 2020 08: 42
      Russia not only lost control in the Caucasus, but gave Turkey an opportunity to put itself on the hook of the Turkish stream. She armed the S-400 and builds a nuclear power plant for her own money. Of course the Turks are now dancing and consider themselves victors. Russia loses its geopolitical positions every time, and this is not surprising given such a policy, because foreign policy should be dealt with by experts and not by fighters and athletes, friends and godfathers. Even in the same Armenia, it is necessary to transfer the cargo through Iran, because the zone of influence in Georgia is ineptly lost, just as Ukraine and a number of countries included in the sphere of influence of Russia are lost to ensure national security
      1. -2
        4 October 2020 09: 47
        Quote: Adimius38
        Russia not only lost control of the Transcaucasus, but gave Turkey an opportunity to plant itself on the hook of the Turkish stream. Armed S-400 and builds a nuclear power plant for her own money.

        I remember here the confused people along with the uryakls (yes, half of the VO!) Rejoiced and danced, they considered these events to be another victory.

        Quote: Adimius38
        Of course the Turks are now dancing and consider themselves victors.

        Send the confused people (and various hangers-on) to the Turks - let them dance together now, since their goals coincided so perfectly.
        1. -1
          4 October 2020 10: 22
          I remember here the confused people along with the uryakly (yes, half of the VO!) Rejoiced and danced

          Never mind, events will turn into a slightly different canvas, and a new wave of "pique vests" with "I told you so" will emerge, and "Putin is the head" ...
      2. +1
        4 October 2020 10: 20
        but gave Turkey the opportunity to put itself on the hook of the Turkish stream

        And just recently I remember how they applauded the Turkish stream, rejoiced at how they bypassed the traitors of the Bulgarians and the hated Ukrainians ...
        Armed S-400

        Did not split NATO? The defense industry complex was supported.
    4. -1
      4 October 2020 15: 01
      There will be an electronic collar, electronic money in Sberbank and a mask on the face. There will be a "guaranteed income" for a while. (Guaranteed by whom? What money?)
  7. -2
    4 October 2020 07: 12
    This is where the lost settlements can be more specific ?? Or are you writing from the words of this Aliyev ??) Nagorno-Karabakh has not lost any settlements. They say Azerbaijan has become the largest supplier of weapons for Armenia over the past 3 days !!!!!!
    1. +3
      4 October 2020 07: 51
      Arthur, Hello.
      This is stated in particular in the article posted today and discussed on VO.
      https://topwar.ru/175764-most-ustojal-v-otlichie-ot-sel-hronika-boev-v-karabahe-na-video-storon.html
      If there are any refuting materials, please post.
      hi
      1. 0
        4 October 2020 08: 33
        https://youtu.be/wQ8zEeY0-r8?t=70
        The Armenians are still quiet.
    2. -1
      4 October 2020 07: 56
      Well, judging by the new daily videos, the new ones, then yesterday I think for Azerbaijan.
  8. +1
    4 October 2020 07: 52
    Wow, how many supporters of the introduction of troops into the Russian Federation on the territory that the UN recognizes as Azerbaijan in order to help brothers in faith.
    And can you find out how many Russian-speaking people lived in Armenia in 1985 and 2020 (and why by the way)? And how many non-Armenians live in Armenia in 2020? Even in Georgia there are schools where they teach in Russian. And in Azerbaijan there are also Russian and Russian-language schools.

    Both the nuclear power plant and the S-400 dragged the ones sold to Turkey. The whole world has been selling arms and large infrastructure projects on credit for decades. And they live with a profitability of 1-2 percent. At least they began to do something in Russia for the future, and then whine from all the cracks.
    1. 0
      4 October 2020 11: 31
      Russia will not bring anyone anywhere - let them figure it out themselves, and given that Pashinyan started talking about the water of the peacekeepers in Karabakh, he says that things have gone badly for the Armenian Armed Forces.
  9. -1
    4 October 2020 07: 55
    And what if you involve Ramzan Kadyrov.
    Wouldn't peacekeepers based on units formed in the Chechen Republic be acceptable to both sides?
    PS exclusively as an option for consideration.
    1. 0
      4 October 2020 08: 19
      Quote: Livonetc
      And what if you involve Ramzan Kadyrov.
      Wouldn't peacekeepers based on units formed in the Chechen Republic be acceptable to both sides?
      PS exclusively as an option for consideration.


      For you, Chechen formations from Chechnya (a subject of the Russian Federation) are Chechens, and for everyone else in the world they are RUSSIAN fellow

      This must be taken into account ...
      1. -1
        4 October 2020 08: 26
        For Muslims, Chechens and their experiences matter.
        And Kadyrov himself has authority in the Muslim world.
        At the same time, this may be an acceptable option for Armenia as well.
        I put it forward as a hypothesis, with the hope that someone from Azerbaijan will join the discussion and express their views.
        1. +4
          4 October 2020 08: 29
          Quote: Livonetc
          For Muslims, Chechens and their experiences matter.

          In NKAO (NKR) there is a predominantly Christian population ...
          1. -1
            4 October 2020 08: 42
            However, the peacekeeping contingent should suit both sides.
            In the course of a peacekeeping operation (purely hypothetical), the task of returning refugees will arise.
            And these will be predominantly Muslims.
            The task will arise to ensure their safety and build trust.
            Further, to stabilize the situation, it will be possible to think about holding a referendum with the participation of both the Armenian and Azeri population of Karabakh.
            It is hypothetically possible to create a new state formation, the emergence of which could be useful both for Armenia and Azerbaijan.
            I understand that this is more a utopia than a reality.
            But we need to look for ways and options for settlement.
            Otherwise, a war of extermination.
            Even after the military successes of the Azerbaijani army, their complete military victory in the foreseeable future raises doubts.
    2. 0
      4 October 2020 08: 50
      Quote: Livonetc
      Wouldn't peacekeepers based on units formed in the Chechen Republic be acceptable to both sides?

      It's simple. Azerbaijan does not agree. And it doesn't matter where the "peacekeepers" come from, even if from Chechnya, even from Kamchatka, even from Ohio.
      From their point of view, this is their territory. From the point of view of international law, this is their territory. The issue, accordingly, is closed.
      1. +1
        4 October 2020 08: 59
        They will disagree only in case of serious success of the current military campaign.
        If they are stopped, and maybe knocked out, then their position may change.
        1. 0
          4 October 2020 09: 32
          Quote: Livonetc
          They will disagree only in case of serious success of the current military campaign.
          If they are stopped, and maybe knocked out, then their position may change.

          They will not agree in any case, as they did not agree 30 years before.
          Imagine, the PRC occupied 20% of the territory of Russia. And when Russia decided to return it, they come to us with a powerful proposal - let's bring peacekeepers from Poland into the occupied territory. They are fellow believers with the Russians, both Christians. How do you like this proposal?
          PS From a military point of view, the longer the war lasts, the greater the chances of Azerbaijan. Their overall economic and demographic superiority will have an effect.
  10. -1
    4 October 2020 08: 03
    Armenia will not withstand a long war with the alliance of Azerbaijan and Turkey, the smell of fried began and Pashinyan began to talk about the introduction of Russian peacekeepers, but Karabakh is legally part of Azerbaijan and Aliyev will not agree to the introduction of our peacekeepers, especially since the Azerbaijanis seem to be successful in this war, even if sort themselves out among themselves
    1. -1
      4 October 2020 08: 52
      Pashinyan is a dark personality and it is not clear whose order he is fulfilling. Therefore, you need to think over everything three times so as not to fall into a trap.
  11. 0
    4 October 2020 08: 08
    People, come to your senses. What kind of peacekeepers? Now order there can be restored either according to the method of General Lebed in Transnistria, which no one needs nafig, or just wait until the parties fizzle out and a new status quo is established.
  12. +1
    4 October 2020 08: 25
    Absolute nonsense. Unlike Armenia, Azerbaijan is categorically unprofitable for any "peacekeepers". They are returning their lands, why do they need to attract third forces? But it is precisely Armenia that benefits from external intervention, which we actually see in practice.
  13. +2
    4 October 2020 08: 33
    with a proposal to include Turkish troops in such a contingent - with the creation of "observation points" of the Turkish armed forces on the same principle that Ankara uses in Syria.


    But this must be agreed with all parties to the conflict ...
  14. -2
    4 October 2020 09: 23
    I wonder why many countries do not understand that sitting on two chairs is beneficial only in the short term and for whose rulers are interested in their immediate benefit. If Armenia were the same reliable ally of Russia as Azerbaijan is for Turkey and would not interfere with the renewal of our military base, etc. . Meetings against Russia as an example. Everything would be different. Perhaps even there would not have been an attack, they would have known that there would be an instant answer. But if, for example, Poland attacked Belarus, then it would have been rolled into the asphalt by the entire ZVO, I have no doubt about it. Today's attitude of Armenia, as they say sama-sama. And the lesson to others will be
  15. 0
    4 October 2020 10: 20
    Aha, let the goat into the garden!
  16. 0
    4 October 2020 10: 50
    Georgia is already Turkish. Aliyev started. Pashinyan will soon support. And there, Turkmenistan will join NATO. Ku-ku!
  17. -1
    4 October 2020 10: 59
    Quote: Observer2014
    But peacekeepers will be needed

    They will be needed if it is possible to chop off at least part of Karabakh with the Armenian population, and the barmaley from Syria will not be able to cope with them right away. Moreover, the peacekeepers will be in exchange for the withdrawal of the Armenian and Karabakh armed forces from this part of Karabakh.

    Quote: Odyssey
    Unlike Armenia, Azerbaijan is categorically unprofitable for any "peacekeepers". They take back their lands

    and his teachers are good, the Armenians still remember 1915, and they will remember 2020 too, everything is ready for genocide. The land is its own, but the population is not. solutions - teachers will explain, or maybe show
  18. -6
    4 October 2020 11: 39
    according to the CSTO charter, the aggressor country must be excluded. Armenia occupied the territory of Azerbaijan and should be excluded. And in this case, Azerbaijan will gladly join there further, maybe Turkey will leave NATO
    1. +6
      5 October 2020 01: 05
      You'd better remember the history of the Karabakh crisis, and then you will accuse Armenia of the aggression carried out by Azerbaijan.
  19. 0
    4 October 2020 11: 45
    Quote: svoit

    and his teachers are good

    Of course they are good, and not only in Azerbaijan. After all, hundreds of thousands of non-Armenians who lived in Armenia and NKAO have disappeared somewhere.
    There are no good or bad in this conflict, everyone is to blame. Armenia does not even want to recognize its beloved Karabakh. Armenian Diaspora around the world, 11 million. We would like to, so they chipped in money, equipped themselves, and put up an army of 100-200-300 thousand bayonets. But no, they sit and overcome the enemy on the Internet.
    The fact that Azerbaijan has accumulated money and resources for the operation is normal, so who prevented Armenia from doing the same? Shake your diasporas around the world.
  20. -2
    4 October 2020 12: 31
    The leader of the unrecognized NKR, Arayik Harutyunyan, announced the start of attacks on Azerbaijani cities with military targets. And this is not terrorism by accident? You cannot strike at civilian objects and civilians. Unfortunately, it is impossible to completely avoid this in the course of hostilities. But the official declaration of readiness to strike at cities is already crossing the red line. The Hague - definitely.
    1. +5
      5 October 2020 01: 03
      Quote: Alena-Baku
      Isn't it terrorism by accident? Strikes must not be made against civilian targets and civilians

      Ask your military if they like to fire at peaceful objects.
  21. +1
    4 October 2020 12: 48
    The whole Turkic ball will unravel as soon as the Turks get it in full in Idlib. And then they will have no time for Karabakh.
    1. +1
      4 October 2020 23: 21
      Quote: Vladimir61
      And then they will have no time for Karabakh.

      That's in the case of the emergence of the State of Kurdistan. Turkey and Erdogan will have their fifth point on fire ... Especially if Kurdistan appears on the "former" territory of Turkey. Let us surrender Armenia - in Transcaucasia we will have nothing to do ...
  22. 0
    4 October 2020 14: 13
    Who are these experts?
  23. 0
    4 October 2020 16: 40
    Perhaps Azerbaijan has not yet begun to attack. What I see in numerous videos is the systematic and methodical destruction of Armenian heavy weapons. They went in, stopped themselves (and the Armenians reported that the offensive had failed) and began remote shooting. I read the comments that they will soon run out of drones. But the Armenians will also run out of tanks. But then Azerbaijan will go on the offensive. You can hero as much as you like, but it smells like a deafening defeat. So what kind of peacekeepers are there? And again I have bad suspicions about Pashinyan. Isn't that what all these races on the Maidan were for? Aliyev would not have started anything large-scale if he knew that the "north wind" would blow. Pashinyan gave him such guarantees. He did everything for this.
  24. 0
    4 October 2020 20: 27
    Quote: demiurg
    After all, hundreds of thousands of non-Armenians who lived in Armenia and NKAO have disappeared somewhere.

    So here it seems they already wrote where they went, most (almost all) were forced to leave their homes and flee in all directions. Nobody writes that there was a genocide, but Turkey has rich experience in this area, and apparently they are ready to share it with the "brotherly people". and the performers are already tired of waiting, but the money is coming.
  25. +6
    5 October 2020 01: 01
    In case of protracted battles, Baku may offer the introduction of a Turkish peacekeeping contingent in Karabakh

    Baku may not count on entering Turkish punishers "peacekeepers" to the region. Russia and Iran will not allow the Turks to gain a foothold in the region.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"