The Belarusian TV channel signed Ukraine as the former Ukrainian SSR. This caused outrage in the Ukrainian media

103
The Belarusian TV channel signed Ukraine as the former Ukrainian SSR. This caused outrage in the Ukrainian media

The Ukrainian media reacted with indignation to the report aired on Belarusian television. This is the story of the STV TV channel, which the Belarusian correspondents devoted to the events in Ukraine.

Special attention was paid to the news release of the mentioned TV channel in the Ukrainian media environment for the reason that the Belarusian TV channel signed Ukraine as the former Ukrainian SSR (Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic).



The Ukrainian media outraged with such a title, and announced the "unfriendly position of the state media of Belarus." An interesting interpretation of the Ukrainian press, especially when you consider that Ukraine has declared its non-recognition of Alexander Lukashenko as President of Belarus. The Ukrainian authorities openly declared that they support the Belarusian opposition, and added that "new and fair elections" should be held in Ukraine.

Meanwhile, the Belarusian media note that for some reason in Ukraine they do not remember how the 2014 elections were held, when a coup d'etat took place in the country. It is noteworthy that earlier the state mass media of the Republic of Belarus tried to avoid such an interpretation as “coup d'etat”, but now, judging by the rhetoric, a lot has changed.

The Ukrainian resource UNIAN called STV employees who used the term "former Ukrainian SSR" "propagandists".

As a matter of fact, there is no error in the title. After all, modern Ukraine is really the former Ukrainian SSR. Only modern Ukrainian activists mention such historical communication evokes extremely negative emotions.

For reference: STV is a large Belarusian TV channel that received a state broadcasting license in 2004. Started broadcasting in 2001.
103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    3 October 2020 18: 05
    We are all former now ..
    1. +13
      3 October 2020 18: 21
      But not the Sumerians!
      1. +14
        3 October 2020 18: 28
        The Sumerians were offended that they were included in the USSR .. laughing
        1. +14
          3 October 2020 18: 47
          Quote: krot
          The Belarusian TV channel signed Ukraine as the former Ukrainian SSR.

          The former Ukrainian SSR, which never became a real Ukraine! Free Ukraine! Yes
          1. +22
            3 October 2020 20: 21
            Belarusian TV channel signed Ukraine as the former Ukrainian SSR

            Well, trolling is counted, well done.
        2. +7
          3 October 2020 23: 03
          Quote: krot
          The Sumerians were offended that they were included in the USSR .. laughing

          As always, "ah, what for us?" belay
        3. 0
          4 October 2020 01: 12
          Quote: krot
          The Sumerians were offended that they were included in the USSR .. laughing

          They want to sell their birthright for lentil stew. The price is stuffed. But if there is nothing besides show-off, then the prices will never get.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +11
      3 October 2020 18: 33
      The funniest thing is that the skakuas turned wild at us because, unwillingly, they were in the same ranks with us, with the former!
      This is fun! laughing
    3. +5
      3 October 2020 18: 43
      Quote: parusnik
      We are all former now ..

      Yes. But understanding this continues to knock and kill.
      In all the former republics of the USSR, albeit with different intensities.
      RB (BSSR) is a good exception. For this he rakes.
      Now, without parenthetical explanations like:
      Belarusian TV channel signed Ukraine as the former Ukrainian SSR (Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic).
      many will not understand. what is it about. But are they needed for "VO"?
    4. +2
      4 October 2020 10: 18
      The Ukrainian authorities openly declared that they support the Belarusian opposition, and added, that in Ukraine must pass "new and fair elections."

      Should new, fair elections be held in Ukraine? what
      1. 0
        5 October 2020 17: 02
        It would be high time.
  2. +15
    3 October 2020 18: 13
    laughing Correctly and signed. It is often necessary to remind what and from what happened. Indeed, the former Ukrainian SSR. And this is how we all are former republics of the USSR.
    1. +3
      3 October 2020 23: 07
      Quote: Observer2014
      .And this is how we are all the former republics of the USSR.

      And even more so, subjects of the Russian Empire Yes
    2. +2
      4 October 2020 10: 13
      Quote: Observer2014
      more often you need to remind what and from what happened.

      There was no Ukraine at all in the Russian Empire. Even the title of Russian emperors read: "The Emperor and Autocrat of the All-Russian, Moscow, Kievskiy, Vladimirskiy ... "Just Kievsky !, but not Ukrainian at all.
      1. +1
        4 October 2020 16: 05
        Quote: Piramidon
        the title of the Russian emperors read: "The Emperor and Autocrat of the All-Russian, Moscow, Kievskiy

        Stunned, never noticed. Thanks. :)
  3. +7
    3 October 2020 18: 13
    Euro Somalia does not cut the perverse brain so?
    1. +4
      3 October 2020 18: 35
      "What kind of brain is it?
      It's a bone! "(C)
      1. 0
        4 October 2020 21: 08
        What kind of brain is there?
        How what? Bone, obviously. There still red blood cells are born.
        1. 0
          5 October 2020 06: 48
          That's it!
          And THOUGHTS should be born! lol
  4. +10
    3 October 2020 18: 15
    I had to sign the title on the topic. Former Oukraina of the Russian Empire. To remember why Ukraine, by the way, there were a lot of them - Priokskaya, Far Eastern, for example. And then you generally need to write them with a small letter. They don't write "The outskirts of the village" ?!
  5. +30
    3 October 2020 18: 20
    Was born already in the "independent". Already at a conscious age, at the beginning of the XNUMXs, I remember that there was not even a mention of the Ukrainian SSR.

    Now, after so many years, I don’t understand how it was possible to give a damn about your past ten years in size.

    Ukraine - and it doesn't matter. They would have been called some kind of Lapland in 91 - they would have been Lyaplyandians, and now they would have torn themselves a dupa for the Lyapland language.

    Mankurt, that's all.
    1. +13
      3 October 2020 18: 46
      Not 10, but a good 70. And there is not the twist of "tearing a dupu for the Laplanian flag." I sincerely do not catch up, what for in any thing, having found something good in my past - trying to attach a steam locomotive "but at the wild Moksha" ... Well, it looks stupid as a statesman, an imperial to the bone marrow - to dress like Ukrainians, he is a Ukrainian, that the Great Russians are torn separatists, the Black Hundreds are wild. There is something to be proud of, and most of all during the Soviet Union, when agrarian Ukraine became a land where, after the collapse of the USSR, the fleet - both fishing and commercial - is the largest in the world, and the industry is cooler than the FRG! Say it now "y" with a pan - there will be hysteria! In spite of the "mokksha" I will say that all my life I dived in the toilet
  6. +6
    3 October 2020 18: 22
    Has the booze gone? We need to feed!
    1. +5
      3 October 2020 23: 13
      Quote: Russia
      Has the booze gone? We need to feed!

      Moreover, the western owners whip from behind with a whip. The cookies are over.
      Hello, MaRus love
  7. -39
    3 October 2020 18: 25
    The former collective farm chairman from the former BSSR was offended by the neighboring country and gave the command to call his mindless TV people "zhestachaisha")))), but ... they chose a theme that works fairly in both directions))). It looks like our chairman, trading in bypassing the Russian embargo with Ukraine, caught the Zradapperamogi virus there))). The feeling of a miscarriage of STV (a competitor for the title of the slag channel itself) is as if, not having time to call it, they got sick themselves.
    1. +9
      3 October 2020 18: 34
      Not Belarus started an information war !!! She kept neutrality for a long time, but patience is coming to an end. So there will be more "humiliating" wording ... from both sides. For what they fought (both sides), they ran into it !!! So it makes no sense to be offended. And even more so to become like the information fighters of Internet battles.
      1. -25
        3 October 2020 18: 37
        The information war is being waged in slightly different ways)) And here ... from the category of the nursery group)) d * cancer - himself d * cancer!)) Dad Vova he is abzyaetstsaa))). What do you want from a person who has not learned any of the state languages ​​in 26 years)))
        1. +6
          3 October 2020 18: 43
          I am a supporter of the fact that Little Russian (not to be confused with the language of Western Ukraine) and Belarusian and Russian are one language, only with different dialects arising from the vast territory of the Republic of Ingushetia and the USSR. By the way, so that both smart and fools would understand you - you need to speak the "language" of a five-year-old child (at least that's what sociologists and psychologists say and political strategists recommend)
          1. -31
            3 October 2020 18: 47
            Russian and Belarusian are different, albeit from the same group of languages, and no one confuses them, unlike you, and they arose long before RI, and even more so before the USSR. By the way, in order to be understood, you need to speak as simply as possible, the language of a five-year-old child)) sometimes you need to ask five times what he meant. Apparently the political strategists were talking about the pipe level)
            1. +18
              3 October 2020 18: 56
              By the way, the language of the Kiev principality was different from the language of Novgorod))) I don't know about you, but I studied the history of Belarus in the early 90s at the Belarusian State University. Well, about languages ​​... in the Stavropol Territory, we can also, from your point of understanding what a language is, claim our own independent - we have words in communication from both the Russian language and the Ukrainian language, and from the languages ​​of the peoples of the North Caucasus and Transcaucasia. ..
            2. +5
              3 October 2020 20: 41
              Quote: JD1979
              Russian and Belarusian are different, albeit from the same group of languages, and no one confuses them, unlike you, and they arose long before RI, and even more so before the USSR.

              Oga, the differences only at the end of the 17th century were outlined, and finally took shape only in the 18th-19th ... "Long" before the Republic of Ingushetia ...
              1. -7
                4 October 2020 10: 22
                Quote: Albert1988

                Oga, the differences only at the end of the 17th century were outlined, and finally took shape only in the 18th-19th ... "Long" before the Republic of Ingushetia ...

                Wow, historians have arrived, the level of the "first nation of Europa"))). Let's tell me about my native language)). Shkolotism is a serious problem.
                1. +1
                  4 October 2020 12: 54
                  Quote: JD1979
                  Let's tell me about my native language)

                  Yes, there is no language. There is simply jargon from the words that the local population adopted from the next owner, which "smart" communists began to spread for ideological reasons.
                  1. -4
                    4 October 2020 13: 39
                    Quote: Dart2027
                    Yes, there is no language. There is simply jargon from the words that the local population adopted from the next owner, which "smart" communists began to spread for ideological reasons.

                    "And these people forbid me to pick my nose" .... Aikew went into a negative meaning.
                    1. +2
                      4 October 2020 14: 25
                      Quote: JD1979
                      And these people forbid me to pick my nose

                      Well, if you want to poke around. Allow me.
                2. +1
                  4 October 2020 18: 18
                  Quote: JD1979
                  Wow, historians have arrived, the level of the "first nation of Europa"))). Let's tell me about my native language)). Shkolotism is a serious problem.

                  Exactly! I fully support you 0 shkololo - a terrible horror, especially a nationalistically processed shkololo ... As for the "language" - until the end of the 17th century there was one language throughout Belarus, Ukraine and Russia, which had many dialects corresponding to large regions and subdialects corresponding to small regions within large regions. At the same time, on the territory of Russia, people spoke approximately the same as in Belarus and Ukraine, only adjusted for pronunciation and dialect words. Thus, there were 3 large dialects - on the territory of modern Russia + -, and also Belarus and Ukraine + -. Moreover, the differences between Western dialects were only in the presence of the influence of neighboring large languages, primarily Polish, which influenced the pronunciation and the presence of dialect words. It just so happened that a literary Russian language was gradually formed in the center of Ingushetia, which over time began to be introduced throughout the territory. It happened in the 19th century. And if on the territory of Russia literary Russian completely supplanted local uncodified dialects, then on the territory of Belarus and Ukraine these dialects were simply given the status of languages, with absolutely similar grammar and general principles of building a language with Russian.
                  An important sad fact is that if we stop actively teaching and promoting the Belarusian and Ukrainian languages, they will completely give way to Russian, just as uncodified dialects are inferior to the literary version of the language ...
                3. 0
                  5 October 2020 09: 05
                  Do Prussians, Saxons, Bavarians and Swabians have the same languages?
            3. +3
              3 October 2020 20: 55
              Quote: JD1979
              Belarusian is different, although from the same group of languages, and no one confuses them, unlike you, and they arose long before the Republic of Ingushetia, and even more so before the USSR.

              the Belarusian language is a mixture of the languages ​​of the countries in which it (Belarus) was located - the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Commonwealth, it's like in Ukraine, you know MOV, but to understand the Zapadensky surzhik is already getting "from the fifth to the tenth" ...
              1. -5
                4 October 2020 10: 28
                Quote: PSih2097
                the Belarusian language is a mixture of the languages ​​of the countries in which it (Belarus) was located - the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Commonwealth, it's like in Ukraine, you know MOV, but to understand the Zapadensky surzhik is already getting "from the fifth to the tenth" ...

                A long time ago an expert graduated from school))) she - Belarus appeared only with the formation of the USSR. Accordingly, she could not enter anywhere))). But the Belarusian language was the state language ON))). And the Belarusian language, like Russian, is officially recognized by the UN, in contrast to the Ukrainian one.))) The site has really turned into a collection of garbage comments ...
                1. +1
                  4 October 2020 18: 22
                  Quote: JD1979
                  But the Belarusian language was the state language ON))).

                  Og, when there was no trace of Belarus ...
                  Quote: JD1979
                  Belarus appeared only with the formation of the USSR

                  Oga, where, then, are purely imperial concepts of Great, Small and White Russia? So maybe there was Belarus after all? Or maybe the language was still called something differently?
                2. 0
                  5 October 2020 09: 06
                  Ie there were 2 languages ​​in Russia? Belarusian and Russian?)
            4. +1
              4 October 2020 18: 21
              Quote: JD1979
              Russian and Belarusian are different, albeit from the same group of languages,

              By the way, does it bother you that the differences between the Belarusian and Russian languages, which in your opinion are "different languages" are much less than between English British and, for example, English Australian, which are officially one language?
    2. +4
      3 October 2020 18: 40
      The former collective farm chairman from the former BSSR was offended by the neighboring country and gave the command to call his mindless TV people "zhestachaisha")))), but ... they chose a theme that works fairly in both directions))). It looks like our chairman, trading in bypassing the Russian embargo with Ukraine, caught the Zradapperamogi virus there))). The feeling of a miscarriage of STV (a competitor for the title of the slag channel itself) is as if, not having time to call it, they got sick themselves.

      Confusion on confusion and confusion drives)))
      On the topic - good trolling of Ukraine)))
      1. -22
        3 October 2020 18: 42
        Quote: lucul
        On the topic - good trolling of Ukraine)))

        on the topic, he trolled himself)) since Belarus is also a former BSSR, and he, with the exception of Russia, is a former president for everyone.
        1. +12
          3 October 2020 18: 46
          on the topic, he trolled himself)) since Belarus is also a former BSSR,

          So Luca ALWAYS reminds of this himself, at every briefing)))
          1. -13
            3 October 2020 18: 49
            Quote: lucul
            So Luca ALWAYS reminds of this himself, at every briefing)))

            Yeah, give me pennies, pa brazzki))) and oil, oh no!))) You're not my brother! I'll buy from America)))
            1. -3
              3 October 2020 18: 57
              Yeah, give me pennies, pa brazzki))) and oil, oh no!))) You're not my brother! I'll buy from America)))

              Luka has always clearly distinguished the power in Russia, the actual Russian power and the power of the oligarchs. And if he had nothing against the first, then he fought mercilessly with the oligarchs, as well as with the Russian opposition.
              Actually, the decline of the career of such figures as Khakamada, Yavlinsky, Nemtsov, Sheremet, Nemtsov and others happened precisely after their visit to Belarus, if anything. It was Lukashenka who put an end to them)))
              1. -19
                3 October 2020 19: 04
                Quote: lucul
                Actually, the decline of the career of such figures as Khakamada, Yavlinsky, Nemtsov, Sheremet, Nemtsov and others happened precisely after their visit to Belarus, if anything. It was Lukashenka who put an end to them)))

                Divine delirium)) In Russia, the oligarchs have merged with the government. In Belarus, for 26 permanent reigns, those who ruled became oligarchs. And yes, officially no.
                1. +3
                  3 October 2020 19: 08
                  Divine delirium)) In Russia, the oligarchs have merged with the vlat. In Belarus, for 26 permanent reigns, those who ruled became oligarchs.

                  Write from a parallel reality?
                  So the oligarchic power of Russia (in your opinion) itself decided to aggravate relations with the West, but to such an aggravation, which is worse than relations than during the Cuban missile crisis?
                  Well, you know, this is already too much ...
                  1. 0
                    3 October 2020 19: 15
                    What confuses you? It's just that our alligators were not given a piece, which they counted on as a reward for the collapse of the USSR .. But instead, they kindly indicated - don't you think, baby, that your place is with the bucket? So they got embittered .. And they entered into contradictions with the West not for Russia's interests, but for their own. To try to knock out what they think they can claim by right .. As soon as they are given what they are looking for, they will immediately sell and hand over both Russia and us orphans ..
                  2. +3
                    3 October 2020 19: 25
                    Quote: lucul
                    So the oligarchic power of Russia (in your opinion) itself decided to aggravate relations with the West

                    How tired of these nonsense about the class struggle. Kings, republics, oligarchs, etc. throughout the history of mankind, they cut their own kind and this did not surprise anyone.
                  3. -2
                    4 October 2020 10: 32
                    Quote: lucul
                    Well, you know, this is already too much ...

                    You know ... your business is to sit with your eyes and ears closed and not know what is happening in your country.
                    1. 0
                      4 October 2020 10: 34
                      You know ... your business is to sit with your eyes and ears closed and not know what is happening in your country

                      Maybe I can see here with my own eyes, but you are from the media? )))
                      1. 0
                        4 October 2020 13: 43
                        Quote: lucul
                        Maybe I can see here with my own eyes, but you are from the media? )))

                        Like a classic: Why did you pull me out of the swamp, I live here))). But something will not reach you, who live there, that we also live here))) and see better))) than they say in YOUR media about the affairs of us))) GloGika, she is so .. ..
          2. +1
            4 October 2020 00: 10
            Quote: lucul
            So Luca ALWAYS reminds of this himself, at every briefing)))

            He also held the Victory Parade for all the former Soviet republics
            what he honestly and openly said from the podium.
        2. 0
          4 October 2020 10: 24
          Quote: JD1979
          on the topic, he trolled himself)) since Belarus is also a former BSSR

          Well, in Belarus they do not deny this, do not react painfully and, unlike the ugly Ukrainians, do not squeal and do not spit shit.
        3. 0
          5 October 2020 09: 10
          Who is your president?)
    3. +2
      3 October 2020 18: 54
      Quote: JD1979
      Former collective farm chairman from the former BSSR

      Learn sayings.
      For example: "For the former, three are not given." ~ ©
      Trinity confirms the truth. hi
      1. +2
        3 October 2020 19: 49
        Yes, and he was the director of the state farm "Gorodets". As if.
  8. +7
    3 October 2020 18: 25
    So it should be done, little prikolchik and how ukrov korezhet))))
    1. +12
      3 October 2020 18: 29
      Quote: Nastia Makarova
      little fun

      This is not fun, this is reality. This is actually the former Ukrainian SSR (in the title there is an inscription about the former).
      So a sane person will not shrink from reality
    2. +8
      3 October 2020 18: 57
      Quote: Nastia Makarova
      So it should be done, little prikolchik and how ukrov korezhet))))

      This is not a "fun". is a litmus.
      From the words "Soviet", "socialist" many writhes.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 0
      4 October 2020 09: 52
      Quote: Nastia Makarova
      So it should be done, little prikolchik and how ukrov korezhet))))

      Only the Ukrainians do not vkurse.
      1. -4
        5 October 2020 06: 11
        Ukrainians howl with anger
  9. +3
    3 October 2020 18: 27
    declared about the "unfriendly position of the state media of Belarus." Interesting interpretation

    What about us? (with)
    1. +5
      3 October 2020 18: 42
      What about us?

      Especially when you consider that Kiev recently joined the sanctions against Belarus)))
      1. -6
        3 October 2020 19: 22
        Specify - going to draw conclusions after the EU-Ukraine summit
  10. +8
    3 October 2020 18: 36
    Belarus gets rid of false bashfulness.
    1. +5
      3 October 2020 20: 57
      Quote: Pavel57
      Belarus gets rid of false bashfulness.

      And from the extra diplomats of Poland and Lithuania
      It is quite obvious that for a long time and patiently we tracked all openly unfriendly gestures towards our country from Poland and Lithuania ... In this regard, the Ambassadors of Poland and Lithuania have been summoned to the Belarusian Foreign Ministry today. In view of the unambiguously destructive activity on the part of these countries, they were offered to bring the composition of their diplomatic missions in Belarus to parity with Belarusian foreign missions in the respective countries by October 9, 2020. For Lithuania, it is from 25 to 14 diplomats, for Poland - from 50 to 18. The press secretary of the Belarusian Foreign Ministry Anatoly Glaz said on Friday.
  11. +1
    3 October 2020 18: 53
    Meanwhile, the Belarusian media note that for some reason in Ukraine they do not remember how the 2014 elections were held, when a coup d'etat took place in the country.

    Belarusian media are shy, the next Ukrop elections were also held with numerous violations that cast doubt on their final result
  12. -10
    3 October 2020 19: 17
    I see nothing wrong with the name of the former Ukrainian SSR
    What do you want if Luka himself invited the "best" Russian TV employees instead of the resigned Belarusian laughing
    Lavras of Solovyov and Skabeeva haunt someone laughing
  13. -1
    3 October 2020 19: 23
    I looked to see if they noticed it in Ukraine or not.
    It turned out that the Belarusian opposition noticed, and from them, they noticed it in Ukraine
    ... The Belarusian national TV channel STV showed a story about Ukraine, in which our country was titled as "the former Ukrainian SSR". The publication "The Village Belarus" drew attention to this fact.
    "The clowning continues on state TV. This is how Ukraine is signed on STV," the newspaper notes. In the comments to the photo, users are outraged by this passage. They joke that Belarus can be called "the former BSSR". Others point out that Belarus is not such a "former Soviet republic".

    https://world.segodnya.ua/world/wnews/v-belarusi-nacionalnyy-kanal-nazval-ukrainu-byvshey-ussr-1480480.html
    It's funny that they learned in Ukraine that they need to take offense not from the state TV of Belarus, but from the opposition channel.
    Interestingly, from what source did it come to VO?
    What was the first in the order of sources of information - the state TV of Belarus, the opposition of Belarus, or the Ukrainian media?
    Which source is being monitored first?
    smile
    1. +1
      3 October 2020 23: 22
      Quote: Avior
      It's funny that they learned in Ukraine that they need to take offense not from the state TV of Belarus, but from the opposition channel.

      In general, they themselves swing the hype. Alternatives are being driven away.
      Having read Warhead, I understand that they are right about the "patriotic" audience. And this led to a drop in the rating of VO as a serious resource.
  14. +3
    3 October 2020 19: 24
    In the regions of Belarus and Russia, bordering the former Ukrainian SSR, ecologists have recorded methane clouds. High concentration gas began to be released throughout Ukraine after the news was released, and uncontrollably and rapidly began to spread in all directions. The best minds of proto-ukrov are racking their brains over how to curb this independent raw material.
  15. +6
    3 October 2020 19: 26
    Well, since the Ukrainian deputy believes that they can call the neighboring country whatever they like at home, for example, Muscovy, why not call them the former Ukrainian SSR? This is at least an absolutely accurate name.
  16. 0
    3 October 2020 19: 28
    Correct the author, a typo ,, they added that "new and fair elections" should be held in Ukraine. "
  17. +4
    3 October 2020 20: 21
    They will be offended by Former Sumeria, no?))
    Or the Reichskommissariat Ukraine?
  18. +4
    3 October 2020 20: 36
    It should be written: the former Ukraine, and now a colony of the EU, the USA and the IMF.
  19. +4
    3 October 2020 20: 40
    I would take that as a compliment!
    Now, only completely dark patriots can shout and rejoice that your country is practically in slavery.
  20. 0
    3 October 2020 21: 19
    Quote: Boris Afinogenov
    Was born already in the "independent". Already at a conscious age, at the beginning of the XNUMXs, I remember that there was not even a mention of the Ukrainian SSR.

    Now, after so many years, I don’t understand how it was possible to give a damn about your past ten years in size.

    Ukraine - and it doesn't matter. They would have been called some kind of Lapland in 91 - they would have been Lyaplyandians, and now they would have torn themselves a dupa for the Lyapland language.

    Mankurt, that's all.

    Lapland is the birthplace of Santa Claus. Don't smudge this place with pig manure.
  21. -5
    3 October 2020 21: 23
    Total. What we have. The agrofuehrer had a fight with the Baltics, had a fight with the second largest trading partner Ukraine, Europe imposes sanctions and wants nothing to do with the president. All hope is in Russia, but Vladimir will not forgive him for what he got up to until August 10, as he bullied the top leadership of his neighbor. The hourglass is upside down. Soon Alexander will go to the exit. It's just a pity that he and his gang will be the last to starve in the country.
  22. 0
    3 October 2020 21: 42
    Again the zrada shining!
  23. +1
    3 October 2020 21: 57
    As soon as the matter is moving towards the Union State and the restoration of the borders of the USSR https://mmanificarum.blogspot.com/2020/09/blog-post_17.html, then switching to the union terminology is the very thing! For example: "The former BSSR informs the former Ukrainian SSR in a friendly way that the former RSFSR, which is the legal successor and successor of the USSR (in the UN, Russia = USSR), is seriously considering the possibility of applying the Criminal legislation of the USSR in terms of state crimes https://mmanificarum.blogspot.com/p /blog-page_60.html, and the leadership of the Ukrainian SSR (and all the other former SSRs) are sort of separatists, and this is Article 64 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR (USSR) and the wall in the courtyard
    1. 0
      3 October 2020 22: 22
      Let me tell you a secret - there was no Criminal Code in the USSR :))
  24. 0
    3 October 2020 21: 58
    Typo - ukroSMI believe that in Belarus, etc.
  25. +1
    3 October 2020 22: 43
    Protrolled, well done)))
  26. +1
    3 October 2020 23: 26
    The fact that in Ukraine they are outraged, you can find out only on VO.
    In Ukraine, as that on the drum.
    If not for VO, I would not even know that the same transmission
    STV (Stolichnoe TV) - the state television channel of Belarus - in the news release on October 3, signed Ukraine as "the former Ukrainian SSR".
    it also used the titles "Former Soviet Lithuanian Republic" and "Former Polish People's Republic".
    A banal prick at the television level. And this is even before joining the sanctions.
    Although when you consider about the Vikings on TV RB. Then everything is logical.
  27. -1
    4 October 2020 00: 06
    So funny
  28. +1
    4 October 2020 00: 31
    Belarusian TV channel signed Ukraine as the former Ukrainian SSR (Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic).

    It was not "Ukraine" that signed, but "Ukraine".
    The Ukrainian authorities openly declared that they support the Belarusian opposition, and added that "new and fair elections" should be held in Ukraine.

    Author, were you in a hurry or were you writing this nonsense "in a state of alcoholic or other intoxication"?
    For reference: STV is a large Belarusian TV channel that received a state broadcasting license in 2004. Started broadcasting in 2001.

    Interesting .. So, since 2001, the channel has been broadcasting without a license? And until 2004, the "bloody tyrant" Lukashenka did not put their eyes on .... ?! No, does it happen in tyranny? Personally, I am disappointed.
  29. +2
    4 October 2020 00: 41
    Just the FATEST trolling. wassat
  30. 0
    4 October 2020 00: 45
    ahahha fellows are harnessing)
  31. 0
    4 October 2020 04: 54
    Quote: JD1979
    Quote: lucul
    On the topic - good trolling of Ukraine)))

    on the topic, he trolled himself)) since Belarus is also a former BSSR, and he, with the exception of Russia, is a former president for everyone.

    what is self-trolling? so the former Russian Federation and the RSFSR. it cancels something? and yes, not only the Russian Federation. China also admitted it. few?
  32. 0
    4 October 2020 04: 55
    And who are they if not the former.
    Shifters.
  33. 0
    4 October 2020 04: 58
    Quote: maktub
    I see nothing wrong with the name of the former Ukrainian SSR
    What do you want if Luka himself invited the "best" Russian TV employees instead of the resigned Belarusian laughing
    Lavras of Solovyov and Skabeeva haunt someone laughing

    names, surnames, and channels on which Russian employees work can you announce?
  34. 0
    4 October 2020 05: 13
    It seems to me in general that Belarus should take over the regions of the "former Ukrainian SSR" bordering on it. For peace of mind and as compensation, for active interference in their internal affairs.
    1. 0
      4 October 2020 10: 06
      Quote: Cottodraton
      It seems to me in general that Belarus should take over the regions of the "former Ukrainian SSR" bordering on it. For peace of mind and as compensation, for active interference in their internal affairs.

      When it seems necessary to be baptized.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  35. 0
    4 October 2020 10: 02
    Well, frankly speaking, not only the "former Ukrainian SSR" flashed in the trash heap called STV, but also the former Polish People's Republic and the CPR. Interestingly, and they will sign Russia "the former Moscow kingdom"?
    Zs the one who made out the article was so broke it was to take a screenshot from the reportage that he just took a photo from the monitor to the phone and inserted it into the header of this article. wassat
    1. The comment was deleted.
  36. 0
    4 October 2020 11: 42
    I would call "Future URSR" (c) Fart Bader bastards will tear harder;)
  37. 0
    4 October 2020 11: 59
    "The wheel of history cannot be stopped!" (C) // G. Dimitrov // The USSR will return and all the Nazis will get what they deserve ....
  38. 0
    4 October 2020 16: 02
    This is 5 ++, the Belarusians are great! :)))
  39. 0
    4 October 2020 16: 18
    Respect and respect to the Bulbash!
    So protrolit Svidomo is a fairy tale !!!!
  40. 0
    4 October 2020 16: 37
    An infrequent example of creativity on the stately harsh Belarusian TV channel! Well done! Usually only oppositionists are not shy about labels and nicknames. drinks
  41. 0
    5 October 2020 13: 33
    Well done STVshniki. Good humor!