Military Review

The timing of the second launch of the Angara-A5 heavy launch vehicle has become known

89
The timing of the second launch of the Angara-A5 heavy launch vehicle has become known

Roskosmos has decided on the date of the second test launch of the Angara-A5 heavy launch vehicle. As reported TASS citing a source in the rocket and space industry, the rocket launch is scheduled for November 24.


The second flight prototype of the Angara-A5 launch vehicle will be launched from the Plesetsk cosmodrome. The rocket with the Upper Stage Briz-M will have to put a mock-up of the spacecraft into geostationary orbit.

The launch is scheduled for November 24

- Said the source agency.

The fact that "Angara-A5" was sent to the cosmodrome was reported in August this year. At the same time, Roskosmos reported that the planned launch of the rocket would take place in November 2020. The first Angara-A5 rocket was launched into space in December 2014. In total, the test program for the heavy launch vehicle provides for six launches, which should take place in the period 2021-2022.

Angara-A5 is the first Russian heavy-class launch vehicle developed entirely in the post-Soviet period. It will be able to launch into space from four to 24 tons of payload, depending on the height of the orbit. The launch vehicle runs on environmentally friendly fuel and is assembled from unified rocket modules, which can significantly reduce the cost of its production and maintenance.

According to information previously published by the media, the serial production of the Angara launch vehicle should start in 2023, and from 2024 it should completely replace the Protons.



89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Piramidon
    Piramidon 3 October 2020 11: 00
    +5
    Well, if from Plesetsk, then there is hope for a successful launch.
    1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
      Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 11: 24
      -11 qualifying.
      The head of NASA receives the head of Roscosmos several times less and has more achievements. Stop betting only on managers. If you do not pay people on whom the development of space growth really depends, then there will be no success.
      1. KCA
        KCA 3 October 2020 11: 28
        +9
        Have you read the tax return of the head of NASA? Who gave it to you?
        1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
          Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 11: 32
          0
          Roscosmos explained why Rogozin may receive more than the head of NASA.

          https://ria.ru/20191128/1561711242.html
          1. KCA
            KCA 3 October 2020 11: 38
            +6
            AND? Maybe, but did you specifically highlight the tax returns of the head of NASA and Rogozin? It's like we are shouting - the doctor's salary is 10 sput, uzhos, without realizing that this is not a salary, but a salary, which interferes with a cloud of allowances, and as a result, it is a salary of at least 40, and this is without a bonus, but a highly qualified doctor is so there it's not at all a shame to boast in the west
            1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
              Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 11: 45
              -17 qualifying.
              You can also read here why the Americans are beating us in the development of space growth.

              https://yandex.ru/turbo/forbes.ru/s/tehnologii/362259-s-luny-svalilis-pochemu-roskosmos-i-nasa-vozglavili-politiki
              1. Whirlwind
                Whirlwind 4 October 2020 05: 23
                +5
                Don't you confuse anything? They are buying the RD-180 from us, because they cannot make their own. We deliver their star-pilots on our Union to the ISS. We, not they, are building a new cosmodrome.
                And all this in the context of financial and economic sanctions on their part.
                Where Roskosmos is to blame is that it still walks with them.
                It's high time to send them in three funny letters and undock. Let them somersault themselves, as they want, and Musk to help them.
            2. Nikolay Ivanov_5
              Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 11: 49
              -24 qualifying.
              I didn't put any cons to you, but if you continue, then blame yourself.
              1. KCA
                KCA 3 October 2020 11: 53
                +3
                Yes, it is understandable, if you don’t hate Rogozin, with or without reason, minuses are provided, here it is clear to the Jozhik how the flag fell - face
                1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
                  Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 12: 01
                  -8
                  If I do not share your point of view, then I just read it. But why put cons?
          2. eklmn
            eklmn 3 October 2020 20: 40
            0
            According to Rogozin (about his bigger z-those than the director of NASA:
            "" NASA, which we are compared to, deals exclusively with civil issues. " Rogozin is disingenuous Yes, NASA got out of the control of the Pentagon, it runs itself, but a close relationship remains - the shuttles also delivered military satellites, and the exchange of new technologies from NASA and the Pentagon is carried out on a regular basis - after all, they work on the same right.
            Salary of the head of NASA - $ 185 thousand per year (from open sources, you can ask Google)
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 3 October 2020 13: 01
        +1
        Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
        The head of NASA receives the head of Roscosmos several times less and has more achievements. Stop betting only on managers. If you do not pay people on whom the development of space growth really depends, then there will be no success.

        If I do not share your point of view, then I just read it. But why put cons?

        Who did you write this to? What have I got to do with it? request Minus and I put you, so that next time they look at who and what you are answering. LЕdrink answers "from the lantern"
        1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
          Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 13: 09
          -6
          I have little joy in this event. Well, very much! This missile "Angara-A5" is being finalized for a very long time.
          1. Piramidon
            Piramidon 3 October 2020 13: 13
            +1
            Quote: Nikolay Ivanov_5
            I have little joy in this event.

            I'm not making you happy. I don't really care about your mood. But what has my post, Plesetsk and Musk's "salary" got to do with it? You weren't taught to read? Or do you see your conjectures between my lines? fool
            1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
              Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 13: 17
              -9
              In general, I'm talking about everything, not about where the rocket will fly from now. sad
              1. Piramidon
                Piramidon 3 October 2020 13: 27
                +2
                Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
                In general, I'm talking about everything, not about where the rocket will fly from now. sad

                And I wrote about that. And you stuck in the wrong place. And now you get out, instead of recognizing your DLNP.
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. Piramidon
            Piramidon 3 October 2020 13: 29
            +1
            Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
            Watch yourself in which branch and with whom you are conducting a dialogue. The answer was to a member with the nickname "KCA".

            He will teach me. I then tracked that your post applies specifically to me. Click on the arrow above your answer and see who it refers to. Otherwise I would have passed by and did not pay attention to your fabrications
            1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
              Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 13: 35
              -6
              An arrow leads to a member with the nickname "KCA".
              1. Piramidon
                Piramidon 3 October 2020 13: 39
                +2
                Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
                An arrow leads to a member with the nickname "KCA".

                Do not twist, but wipe your eyes. There is no "KSA" above my post or after it. You butted me right after me. negative

                How hard it is for you to recognize your mistakes. Most in such cases write - "Yes, I'm sorry, I was wrong" I respect such people and have no complaints about them. You, like that worm, spinning in a frying pan.
                1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
                  Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 13: 47
                  -6
                  And what did you dislike about the answer ???
                  1. Piramidon
                    Piramidon 3 October 2020 13: 49
                    +1
                    Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
                    And what did you dislike about the answer ???

                    Great again. Should I repeat what I wrote earlier?
                    1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
                      Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 13: 55
                      -8
                      And here again, pronounced categoricalness develops into ordinary rudeness.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. Nikolay Ivanov_5
          Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 13: 28
          -9
          [quote = Piramidon] [quote = Nikolay Ivanov_5] Who did you write this to? What have I got to do with it? request Minus and I put you, so that next time they look at who and what you are answering. LЕdrink answers "from the lantern" [/ quote]

          Watch yourself in which branch and with whom you are conducting a dialogue. The answer was to a member with the nickname "KCA".
          1. Piramidon
            Piramidon 3 October 2020 13: 51
            +1
            [quote = Nikolai Ivanov_5] [quote = Piramidon] [quote = Nikolai Ivanov_5] Who wrote this to you? What have I got to do with it? request Minus and I put you, so that next time they look at who and what you are answering. LЕdrink answers "from the lantern" [/ quote]

            Watch yourself in which branch and with whom you are conducting a dialogue. The answer was to the participant with the nickname "KCA". [/ Quote]
            Again you post the same crap again. I've already answered it. Or did you decide to troll and get me? Are you breaking me into obscene language so that you can talk to the moderators later? Get lost, troll!
            1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
              Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 14: 07
              -6
              This is a forum where each member can write about what he thinks without breaking the rules. I don’t understand one thing, that you poke and poke at me everything?
              1. Piramidon
                Piramidon 3 October 2020 14: 18
                +1
                Everything is clear with you, troll.
                1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
                  Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 14: 20
                  -4
                  The answer is a simple and insignificant boor.
                  1. Piramidon
                    Piramidon 3 October 2020 16: 01
                    +1
                    Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
                    The answer is a simple and insignificant boor.

                    Oh, how you scatter accusations here! What did I get nasty with you, Svidomo troll? I'm just stating facts. The fact that you here provoked me to an obscene answer is clear to me. Your further actions (lay me down to the site moderators and ban me) too. How to treat you after that?
                    1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
                      Nikolay Ivanov_5 3 October 2020 16: 08
                      -6
                      And you with a low level of intelligence and extremely bad manners can only be rude ???
          2. Bad_gr
            Bad_gr 3 October 2020 13: 51
            +3
            Quote: Nikolay Ivanov_5
            Keep track of which branch and with whom you are conducting a dialogue.

            And if in the body of your message you duplicate the opponent's statement to which you are giving the answer, then there would be no such showdown at all.
            1. Piramidon
              Piramidon 3 October 2020 14: 31
              +3
              Quote: Bad_gr
              And if in the body of your message you duplicate the opponent's statement to which you are giving the answer, then there would be no such showdown at all.

              This is the most correct approach to the process of replies to posts. I fully support it. good It is not for nothing that the buttons "answer" and "quote" were invented. But some - just where to poke.
      3. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 3 October 2020 21: 14
        0
        Quote: Nikolay Ivanov_5
        The head of NASA receives several times less
        Sketch past the checkout. yes
    2. Harry.km
      Harry.km 3 October 2020 21: 01
      0
      Quote: Piramidon
      Well, if from Plesetsk, then there is hope for a successful launch.

      In general, there is still hope that this model, after launch, will begin to maneuver and, after 400 days, will land on its own in a given area and, after a software update, will be ready for further test flights.
  2. Freemason Mason
    Freemason Mason 3 October 2020 11: 06
    -9
    The rocket with the Upper Stage "Briz-M will have to be put into geostationary orbit layout spacecraft

    I remember how the local audience made fun (and individuals continue to make fun!) Over the launch of the Falcon Heavy with Tesla. Although that launch was also a TEST.
    I'm wondering if the local "jokers" for the next 2 years will poison jokes about the launch of the Hangar with a concrete block instead of PN? Or is it something else? laughing

    PS and here are the first minusators. I wonder what specifically in my comment they didn't like? winked
    1. Cowbra
      Cowbra 3 October 2020 11: 16
      14
      No. they will laugh at the Falcon-9 launch, which was once again disrupted today, and the sect of Saint Mask, who claims that everything breaks down only in Russia)))
      1. Blackmokona
        Blackmokona 3 October 2020 11: 17
        -9
        Poor Musk, made only 15 launches this year, against 9 launches of Russia.
        1. Cowbra
          Cowbra 3 October 2020 11: 23
          11
          You forgot to count the Starships, though they flew in pieces and 20 meters laughing What to expect when collecting a doll in the desert without a slipway with a sledgehammer laughing The super-heavy one with the spy satellite flew away from him, or will we also nod at Roscosmos?
        2. slipped
          slipped 3 October 2020 12: 15
          12
          Quote: BlackMokona
          Poor Musk, made only 15 launches this year, against 9 launches of Russia.


          First 10 launches in Russia. secondly, the same amount is planned, in addition, launches will also be from Kuru.
          1. Blackmokona
            Blackmokona 3 October 2020 12: 51
            -2
            Well, Musk also has a bunch of launches planned. Business then.
            1. slipped
              slipped 3 October 2020 13: 28
              +8
              Quote: BlackMokona
              Well, Musk also has a bunch of launches planned. Business then.

              What is our race? laughing Are we in a hurry somewhere? lol We will launch everything that is planned this year, fulfilling our obligations to customers.
              1. Perseverance
                Perseverance 3 October 2020 13: 40
                -4
                Quote: slipped
                Quote: BlackMokona
                Well, Musk also has a bunch of launches planned. Business then.

                What is our race? laughing Are we in a hurry somewhere? lol We will launch everything that is planned this year, fulfilling our obligations to customers.

                Is everything straight? without hyphenation laughing
                MOSCOW, September 1. / TASS /. Russian navigation satellite of the new generation "Glonass-K2" will be launched in 2021, not in 2020,

                The launch of the fourth Earth remote sensing satellite "Resurs-P", scheduled for November 2020, has been postponed to 2021.
                1. slipped
                  slipped 3 October 2020 14: 34
                  +6
                  Quote: Perseverance
                  Is everything straight? without hyphenation laughing


                  The plans are flexible enough and they are adjusted. If you mean last year's plans for this year, then the launches of MLM-U Nauka, Resurs-P No. 2021 and Obzor-R have been postponed to the 4st launch. The launch of the second part of ExoMars has been postponed to 2022, to a new astronomical window. In addition, there were problems with the delivery of payloads to our cosmodromes from the Arianspace company - there was a break in launches for more than half a year.

                  Quote: Perseverance
                  MOSCOW, September 1. / TASS /. Russian navigation satellite of the new generation "Glonass-K2" will be launched in 2021, not in 2020,


                  As for the GLONASS satellites, they are launched as the resource of the satellites in the constellation depletes. For example, in mid-October it is planned to launch the next launch of the third-generation satellite "Glonass-K" to replace the failed apparatus.
              2. Blackmokona
                Blackmokona 3 October 2020 13: 46
                -3
                Oh well
                Roskosmos has planned launches of more than 2020 space rockets in 40. As specified in the state corporation, they will be carried out from the Baikonur, Vostochny, Plesetsk cosmodromes and the space center in French Guiana.

                https://rg.ru/2019/12/30/roskosmos-zaplaniroval-na-2020-god-zapuski-bolee-40-raket.html
                1. slipped
                  slipped 3 October 2020 14: 37
                  +2
                  Quote: BlackMokona
                  Oh well
                  Roskosmos has planned launches of more than 2020 space rockets in 40.


                  This figure includes ICBM launches. And yes, the plans are adjusted throughout the year depending on the readiness of the payload from a particular customer.
                  1. Blackmokona
                    Blackmokona 3 October 2020 14: 54
                    -3
                    Of course of course. wassat
                    Roskosmos plans to launch more than 2020 missiles in 40 for space purposes.
                    1. slipped
                      slipped 3 October 2020 14: 57
                      +2
                      Quote: BlackMokona
                      Of course of course. wassat
                      Roskosmos plans to launch more than 2020 missiles in 40 for space purposes.


                      Journalists are sometimes wrong. laughing For them, all the rockets from Roscosmos are for space purposes. Although, there is some truth in this, at least there is one military rocket for purely space purposes. laughing
          2. Freemason Mason
            Freemason Mason 3 October 2020 12: 55
            -1
            Kourou launches are not included in the Russian launch statistics. If you count the launches according to your method, then you need to attribute to the United States 4 more (1 emergency) launches of the Electron rocket from the cosmodrome in New Zealand. And also the subsequent launches of Electron from there, of which at least 3 are expected by the end of the year.
            1. slipped
              slipped 3 October 2020 13: 35
              +5
              You are wrong. The launches from the GCC are included in the launch statistics. Since the launch is carried out by the calculation of Roskosmos within the framework of the joint venture Starsem. But the launch operator is the Arianspace company, which buys our media and launch services.
              1. Freemason Mason
                Freemason Mason 3 October 2020 14: 31
                -3
                I am not mistaken. Open the statistics of rocket launches, for example, for 2019. On the Russian wiki, Soyuz-ST-A launches from Kuru are recorded in ESA launches, and Electron launches - in New Zealand launches. In the English wiki, the launches of the Unions from the Kuru are recorded in the Russian ones, but the launches of the Electron are also recorded in the American ones. That is exactly what I wrote about above.
                1. slipped
                  slipped 3 October 2020 14: 54
                  +4
                  Quote: Freemason
                  I am not mistaken. Open the rocket launch statistics


                  Yeah. You are wrong. https://www.roscosmos.ru/launch/2019/ laughing It's easy enough to open statistics.
                  1. Freemason Mason
                    Freemason Mason 3 October 2020 15: 26
                    -2
                    Well, Roskosmos is doing well, ascribes to itself the launches of rockets that ESA buys from it, so what? As I say, then record the Electron launches in the US launches. However, what are we arguing about? I doubt that even with launches from Kuru, Roscosmos will catch up with SpaceX. And yes - we have no competition with the USA, at least not officially. But the launch figures of one private company speak volumes about who rules the commercial launch market. And against the background of these figures, it is somehow especially proud to be proud of the launch of the Angara being developed for more than 20 years - an analogue of Atlas 5 and Ariana 5 - is simply stupid. If something changes for the better in the coming years (it really changes, and not what Rogozin promises there by 20XX), for example, they make good reusable rockets, or finally finish the Eagle Federation - I'm all for it)
                    1. slipped
                      slipped 3 October 2020 16: 15
                      +5
                      Quote: Freemason
                      Well, Roskosmos is doing well, ascribes to itself the launches of the rockets that ESA buys from it, so what?


                      And then. Roscosmos launches laughing Therefore, launches are taken into account. What is not clear to you?

                      Quote: Freemason
                      As I say, then record the Electron launches in the US launches.


                      Do whatever you want. What is it to us? lol We have enough launches of our own.

                      Quote: Freemason
                      However, what are we arguing about?


                      Indeed, what are you talking about? laughing

                      Quote: Freemason
                      I doubt that even with launches from Kuru, Roscosmos will catch up with SpaceX. And yes - we have no competition with the USA, at least not officially.


                      We don't need to "catch up" with anyone. And yes, we do not have any "competition" with the United States, you just said that. We have our own extensive space program. For example, on October 14, we are launching a new station crew, which includes an American astronaut. At the same time, experiments on the Russian program continue on the ISS:



                      Quote: Freemason
                      But the launch numbers of one private company speak volumes about who rules the commercial launch market.


                      This year, nine commercial launches of the Arianspace company from our cosmodromes have been postponed for six months, and only in December they will resume again.

                      Quote: Freemason
                      And against the background of these figures, it is somehow especially proud to be proud of the launch of the Angara, which is being developed for more than 20 years - an analogue of Atlas 5 and Ariana 5 - is simply stupid.


                      Your logic is lame. laughing The A5 rocket is intended to replace the Proton-M rocket, which will stop flying from Kazakhstan in 2025. What is not clear to you? A rocket powered by toxic toxic fuel heptyl-amyl is being replaced by oxygen-kyrosine fuel in the same class, moreover, launches of such a highly demanded launch vehicle are transferred to the territory of Russia. In addition, this rocket will go through several more stages of modernization, which will significantly increase the output load.
      2. Freemason Mason
        Freemason Mason 3 October 2020 11: 22
        -5
        What other falcon 9 missed launch? Just postponed due to bad weather. Rogozin and his team can once again be glad that they are spared such difficulties when launching, since Baikonur is located far from the places where tropical cyclones occur.

        And I also want to remind you that SpaceX has made 15 launches since the beginning of the year, not counting the Starship test jumps, while Roskosmos has only 10, and Spacex launched heavy falcon 9 (according to the output PN, this is an analogue to our Proton), and Roscosmos - medium Unions. And there is reason to believe that this gap will only widen by the end of the year

        PS And yes, I am not saying that everything breaks down only in Russia - everyone has failures, just someone stops after that, and someone moves on. The fact that Musk's private company in the past 5 years has been operating much more successfully than the state-owned Roscosmos, which is in a deep crisis - it seemed to me that this is obvious
        1. Alexey Sommer
          Alexey Sommer 3 October 2020 11: 54
          +9
          Quote: Freemason
          And I also want to remind you that SpaceX has made 15 launches since the beginning of the year, not counting the Starship test jumps, while Roskosmos has only 10, and Spacex has launched

          I remind you the same.
          This is one year's statistics. in particular 20, before that it was the opposite.
          Then we'll wait and see. hi
        2. OgnennyiKotik
          OgnennyiKotik 3 October 2020 12: 17
          +1
          Quote: Freemason
          SpaceX has completed 15 launches since the beginning of the year, not counting the Starship test jumps, while Roskosmos has only 10.

          We compare SpaceX and country. If we compare the launches of the US and Russia, the picture is even worse, 21 versus 10. The situation will become more complicated further. Blue Origin is on its way. Lockheed and Boeing won't give up their positions just like that. There are still a lot of smaller scale private traders.
          Competition is the engine of progress.
          1. Cowbra
            Cowbra 3 October 2020 12: 42
            +2
            Only there is no competition. And Musk doesn't belong there, it's NASA and the Pentagon. So they are lobbying their interests stupidly and banally not letting Roscosmos go. And what about progress - have they learned to fix breakdowns on the ISS, or are they using the Russian toilet again? And when they break the Russian one in their own segment, they break the Russian one already in the Russian segment ... Well, straight craftswomen-needlewomen
        3. mihail_mihail0620
          mihail_mihail0620 3 October 2020 12: 30
          +6
          Quote: Freemason
          Rogozin and his team can once again be glad that they are spared such difficulties when launching, since Baikonur is located far from the places where tropical cyclones occur.

          In Kazakhstan, the weather with its own quirks, you do not seem to know about it.
    2. stalki
      stalki 3 October 2020 11: 39
      +3
      PS and here are the first minusators. I wonder what specifically in my comment they didn't like?
      I didn’t like your amusement and your arrogant treatment, but what can’t be negative?
    3. Alex 2020
      Alex 2020 3 October 2020 11: 43
      0
      and now the first minusators have appeared. I wonder what specifically in my comment they didn't like? winked
      they always don't like the truth and clear, specific information (not just your comment).
    4. strelokmira
      strelokmira 3 October 2020 12: 51
      -1
      PS and here are the first minusators. I wonder what specifically in my comment they didn't like?

      True, the eyes colitis, that's what they didn't like wink
  3. Interlocutor
    Interlocutor 3 October 2020 11: 06
    +3
    It's good that there are plans for the near future to launch something new.
    1. ultra
      ultra 3 October 2020 11: 16
      -3
      Do you believe in six launches at 21-22? Second launch six years after the start of flight tests !!! First launch 18 years after the start of the entire Angara program !!!
      1. slipped
        slipped 3 October 2020 12: 16
        +7
        Quote: ultra
        Do you believe in six launches at 21-22? Second launch six years after the start of flight tests !!! First launch 18 years after the start of the entire Angara program !!!


        The next year will launch both the heavy and light versions.
  4. JD1979
    JD1979 3 October 2020 11: 08
    -17 qualifying.
    4-24 tons of heavy class .... And these people are still driving something to the Mask))) RossTrampoline the bottom is broken.
    1. Cowbra
      Cowbra 3 October 2020 11: 17
      15
      You - for sure. For this is a difficult class. Above is super heavy
      1. Jurkovs
        Jurkovs 3 October 2020 12: 08
        -8
        Heavy class from 30 to 50 tons. And 24 tons were launched by Proton and it was considered the middle class.
        1. slipped
          slipped 3 October 2020 12: 20
          +6
          Quote: Jurkovs
          Heavy class from 30 to 50 tons. And 24 tons were launched by Proton and it was considered the middle class.


          Medium - Soyuz-2 and Soyuz-5,6 - from 9 to 18 tons into low orbit. Heavy - Proton-M and A5 (M, P) - from 23 to 27 tons per LEO. Super heavy - A5B - up to 38 tons per LEO. Super heavy - Yenisei - 103 tons per LEO.
          1. ultra
            ultra 3 October 2020 12: 57
            -2
            Quote: slipped
            Super heavy - Yenisei - 103 tons per LEO.

            Is this the Yenisei on which Ragozin is going to assemble the Nuclon in orbit by the year 30? And when will the first launch of the Yenisei be? wassat
            1. slipped
              slipped 3 October 2020 13: 39
              +3
              Quote: ultra
              And when is the first launch of the Yenisei? wassat

              In 2028, from the Vostochny cosmodrome with an unmanned PTK NP Orel.
              1. ultra
                ultra 3 October 2020 14: 02
                -3
                Das ist fantastish !!!! laughing
                1. slipped
                  slipped 3 October 2020 14: 39
                  +2
                  Quote: ultra
                  Das ist fantastish !!!! laughing


                  Well no. German it is so German. lol

                  "We were born to make a fairy tale come true" so to speak. laughing
              2. ultra
                ultra 3 October 2020 14: 04
                -3
                They have been sawing the hangar for more than 20 years and so far not a gram of the payload has been removed, and the Yenisei will fly with some fright in less than 10 years?
                1. slipped
                  slipped 3 October 2020 14: 48
                  +3
                  Quote: ultra
                  The hangar has been sawing for over 20 years and so far not a single gram of the payload has been removed,


                  First of all, you forgot about the South Korean NARO-1. laughing URM Angara would be ready in 2004. For a long time, the start in Plesetsk was not ready for various reasons. and then the transfer of production to Omsk. Second, the payload in the second test run of the A5 will be the main engine. But starting from the third launch in 2021, there is already a regular RB and a real spacecraft.

                  Quote: ultra
                  Will Yenisei fly with some fright in less than 10 years? Yes, you are a science fictionist, however!


                  Because everything for this will be ready in 8 years. The first stage module will begin its LKI in 2023 as part of the Soyuz-5 launch vehicle, the central unit in 2025 as part of the Soyuz-6 launch vehicle, the third hydrogen stage in 2026, as part of the A5V launch vehicle. Well, in 2028, the assembly of these modules under the name "Yenisei" flies from the third stage of the Vostochny cosmodrome built by that time. Now, as you know, only the second stage is undergoing shock construction, until 2023.
        2. Cowbra
          Cowbra 3 October 2020 12: 23
          +4
          Hospadya, falcon-9 what class? Heavy. Carrying capacity 22,5 tons. Usually 2,5))) Ie. 2,5-22,5 versus 4- 24
          https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/500393main_TA01-LaunchPropulsion-DRAFT-Nov2010-A.pdf
          Heavy: 20-50.
          Bulk both in mud)))
      2. JD1979
        JD1979 3 October 2020 12: 12
        0
        Quote: Cowbra
        You - for sure. For this is a difficult class. Above is super heavy

        Uh-huh. Knocking on the back of the bottom, dig deeper. It seems that you are already tired of being surprised at human stupidity, but there will be individuals again ... And it seems that information is available to everyone ...
        So for 9 individuals who put a minus, and you striped:
        Light class up to 5 tons
        Medium: 5-20
        Severe: 20-100
        Super Heavy: 100+
        This is the Soviet classification, the Western one is slightly different. That is, something of the middle class turned out, with the capture of light and heavy, but using this something to output 4-5 tons ... Money down the drain, but in the heavy class it is almost nothing. That is, this is a normal middle class of speakers, but the question is, how did it come out much better than the existing ones? Most likely nothing, and an attempt to call it a heavy class, nothing but cheap PR is not.
  5. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 3 October 2020 11: 10
    +8
    Good luck! Per aspera ad astra
  6. Doccor18
    Doccor18 3 October 2020 11: 17
    +6
    It will be able to launch into space ... up to 24 tons of payload ..

    Very decent.
    We will wait for a serious Russian breakthrough in space. Everyone was bored of the space victories of the USSR ...
    1. viktor_ui
      viktor_ui 3 October 2020 12: 29
      -10 qualifying.
      Expect a breakthrough as well as a future pension ... because you believe Roskokosmos. Let Rogozin start up his home car as a payload fellow He also promised to test SAS for the whole world from a heavy launch vehicle. wassat SAID - DID ... or poorly?
  7. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 3 October 2020 12: 05
    -6
    Let the launch be successful. Let's be a little proud. Nothing depends on this launch. There cannot be a rocket made with 20th century technology to be a promising rocket in the 21st century. She is simply not needed anymore. Not in terms of efficiency. neither cost nor load. Nobody needs her. To the best of our knowledge, payload developers ignore it. Remember how in "The Taming of Fire" Lavrov, in the role of the Queen, says that "the rocket is morally outdated, even if it does fly, no one needs it," and suggested switching to R-7. Now we are facing the same situation, only we do not have a person of Korolev's scale.
    1. slipped
      slipped 3 October 2020 12: 24
      +4
      Quote: Jurkovs
      Let the launch be successful. Let's be a little proud.


      Required.

      Quote: Jurkovs
      Nothing depends on this launch.


      This is a test run.

      Quote: Jurkovs
      There cannot be a rocket made with 20th century technology to be a promising rocket in the 21st century. She is simply not needed anymore. Not in terms of efficiency. neither cost nor load. Nobody needs her. To the best of our knowledge, payload developers ignore it.


      Crap. laughing All new heavy payloads are created on the basis of their launch on the Angara rocket. For "Proton-M" there are a dozen PNs left under previously concluded contracts.

  8. Unemployed
    Unemployed 3 October 2020 12: 25
    -5
    Angara-A5 is the first Russian heavy-class launch vehicle developed entirely in the post-Soviet period. She will be able to launch into space from four to 24 tons of payload

    Rockets of the heavy class "Saturn" and "Energia" were withdrawn from 100 to 120 tons. Angara is a baby. But in journalism, the main thing is the word.
    Moreover, Energia ran on the most environmentally friendly fuel in the world - hydrogen and oxygen = water.
    1. slipped
      slipped 3 October 2020 12: 46
      +6
      Quote: Unemployed
      Angara is a baby.


      The Angara missile complex is a class of both heavy and super-heavy missiles. Up to 38 tons to low earth orbit. These missiles have such a niche. For the output of a hundred tons and on the trajectories of manned missions departing to the Moon, we are developing the STK "Yenisei"

      Quote: Unemployed
      Moreover, Energia ran on the most environmentally friendly fuel in the world - hydrogen and oxygen = water.


      The Energia launch vehicle used kerosene and oxygen on the parablocks, and hydrogen and oxygen on the central unit. The same will happen in the carrier А5В - the third stage on this carrier is hydrogen.
  9. vadivm59
    vadivm59 3 October 2020 19: 12
    0
    2024 year. Ura !!!
  10. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 3 October 2020 19: 25
    -3
    Layout ... And something really useful for the economy and the national economy?
    1. Thunderbringer
      Thunderbringer 4 October 2020 08: 56
      +3
      Maybe a capsule with freedom fighters from the regime?
  11. Loginoff
    Loginoff 3 October 2020 19: 31
    -2
    Quote: KCA
    AND? Maybe, but did you specifically highlight the tax returns of the head of NASA and Rogozin? It's like we are shouting - the doctor's salary is 10 sput, uzhos, without realizing that this is not a salary, but a salary, which interferes with a cloud of allowances, and as a result, it is a salary of at least 40, and this is without a bonus, but a highly qualified doctor is so there it's not at all a shame to boast in the west

    You probably work at Rosstat because 40 does not smell. 24-26 is still real. Higher - with wild overloads and without rest.
  12. Sancho_SP
    Sancho_SP 3 October 2020 23: 02
    -2
    The people who defend Rogozin and others are strange.
  13. The eye of the crying
    The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 15: 27
    0
    Layout. That is, this is another test launch.
  14. fa2998
    fa2998 4 October 2020 15: 42
    -1
    Quote: Whirlwind
    And all this in the context of financial and economic sanctions on their part.

    What are they bad! Let us, and we, in response, declare our financial and economic sanctions? I think they will not change their exchanges even for one point! laughing hi