Military Review

"If necessary, repeat" in American

154

For the majority of European politicians, and Russian politicians too, the events taking place in Europe and in countries bordering Europe are of the greatest interest. If you look back, it will become clear that these events are clearly leading to a deterioration in relations between the CSTO and NATO, between European countries, between countries located in the immediate vicinity of Europe.


Today no one hides that the situation in the world, and by the word "peace" I mean Europe and the states of the Near and Middle East, is tense as never before. Even the outbreak of the war in Karabakh did not surprise anyone. As not surprising possible events in Transnistria, South Ossetia and several other regions. I understand that these words will sound scary, but the world is ready for war.

It is clear that the majority of the population of European and Asian states still hopes that the war will bypass them, that diplomats and politicians will have enough political will to resolve the conflicts that arise peacefully. Moreover, frozen conflicts are quickly forgotten. They don't shoot, and that's good. Karabakh has shown how illusive it is.

USA prepares for World War II


I understand that the majority of readers have now doubted my sanity. Which World War II? Mankind ended that war long ago and managed to lick many of the wounds received then. And the world has changed. The USSR disappeared, traditional enemies France and Germany are friends today. There is no confrontation between ideologies. And so on, so on, so on ...

But how important is it to start a conflict? In the same Karabakh, countries are fighting, which seem to be going in one direction. NATO opposes us, although today we are the same capitalist state as they are. The Americans constantly humiliate European countries, bringing them to their knees, forcing them to do what is beneficial to the United States, despite the fact that everyone seems to be allies. Any European willfulness is nipped in the bud by the roar of American tank caterpillars on the autobahns of Europe.

Today we will talk about what the Pentagon plans in case of the outbreak of hostilities in Europe. And World War II, as a term, was used by me to explain the plans, and not the memories of stories humanity.

Scary pictures of mutual destruction of the United States, Russia and China do not suit anyone. Tales that dinosaurs will die out due to natural causes will forever remain fairy tales. Simply because around each "dinosaur" there is a huge amount of small things feeding. Someone manages to snatch their piece even from the monster's table, someone is content with crumbs that fall to the floor, someone simply steals what is bad. But everyone is happy.

From a military point of view, NATO can be added to the "dinosaurs". Precisely as a European monster. The contingent that the Americans keep in Europe is incapable of independently waging a conventional war. This is just a part of the European army, which can be completely sacrificed after the outbreak of the war between Russia and NATO. At the same time, without striking any blows at Russia. Make big eyes: oh, how stupid these Europeans are, we are against the war with the Russians! ..

And at the same time, start a war with ... No, not with Japan, as it was during World War II, but with China. Fortunately, there are many disputed islands. And the Chinese fleet is not strong enough to drive American ships across the oceans. The fierce battles between the USA and the PRC for some atoll look beautiful. Two platoons show miracles of heroism ... And a minesweeper sunk by the enemy will forever become a symbol of the heroism of American sailors! ..

The war in Europe, meanwhile, is leading to disastrous results. Millions of dead, completely destroyed economy, destabilization of the political system, destruction of the social sphere, and so on. And then an American appears on a white horse. And from the side that wins. And it helps to "finish off the reptile." At the same time, getting all the victory trophies in full. Peace or truce is concluded with China, since both countries are tired of war and these islands are not worth such sacrifices.

Is the author a science fiction writer? Reproduces the long-worn plastics of the world apocalypse? May be. But then answer the author a couple of questions. Are there today among NATO members and any "graduate students" those who, with appropriate financial and military injections, are capable of starting a war against Russia? Are there forces in NATO capable of waging a conventional war with the Russians? Finally, is there a nuclear weapon in Europe?

Any point of view must be supported by facts


Those who remember the times of the USSR, who began military service in the Soviet Army, remember that the Americans never hid who their enemy was. Any US exercise was very clearly directed against a specific enemy. Not red and blue, like ours, but specifically against the Soviets. With the appropriate attributes, military equipment and tactics. Believe me, today nothing has changed in this regard.

Remember the announcements in the Western press about hiring Russian speakers as extras to participate in military exercises? Remember the Soviet MiGs from the former ATS countries that imitated the enemy? Remember the participation of the Ukrainian military in NATO exercises? Despite the victorious reports of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, it was clear to everyone that the capabilities of Western and Soviet technology and weapons were being tested. No more.

Recently, the American Air Force magazine reported the completion of the 3rd exercise off the coast of California. fleet USA. The article, as it should be in reputable publications, was accompanied by a photograph of the American military, showing "good combat training and coordination." It was this photo that attracted the attention of specialists. More precisely, the specialists became interested in the chevron of the American officer.

This is not a cool Marine or a commando from Delta. This is the operator of the MQ-9 Reaper drone, better known to a wide range of readers as the "Reaper of Darkness". These "Reapers" are widely used by the Americans in the conduct of hostilities. So chevron. Skull-operated MQ-9 Reaper drone. Something in the style of Russian "demobels".

But if you take a closer look, this "skull" is flying not somewhere in the unknown, but over a specific country - China. For those who take their word for it, this is from the same series as the missile defense system in Europe against Iran. For the rest, the specific purpose of the exercises is clear. More precisely, a specific opponent at the moment.

What did the strike groups of the 3rd Fleet do from September 3 to September 29? Officially, surface ships, submarines, special forces and the marines were preparing to transfer significant forces to the western Pacific. Is it real?

Actually, the capture of the island, the relocation of drones there and the practice of strikes in unfamiliar terrain were practiced. In this case, almost all the available means of the fleet were used. Simply put, the Americans are working on scenarios of the past war, but with a different enemy. What I wrote about above.

Naturally, the probable enemy of the Americans perfectly understood what the Yankees were working on and why. According to information from Beijing, we are talking about the islands in the South China Sea, which are controlled by the PRC. The possession of these islands practically deprives the American navy of the ability to maneuver in this region. If today this is not so noticeable, then in the near future, when the islands receive the appropriate weapons, the fleet will have a very difficult time.

By the way, the Chinese also do not sit idly by. Between July and September, they have already conducted two exercises in the region. Moreover, the latter, in the area of ​​the disputed (Vietnam and Taiwan) Paracel Islands, with live fire. What caused panic in the United States. Mike Pompeo, along with other US singers, even recalled the decision of the Hague Tribunal on the illegality of China's possession of the islands.

The Chinese politely listened to the speech of the American Secretary of State and ... continued their teachings further. The answer is a quote from the Chinese newspaper Global Times (a Chinese daily tabloid newspaper sponsored by People's Daily) that expresses the CCP's official opinion on international issues. Quote about the US exercise:

Washington is stepping up preparations for a war with China. This drone, which has committed murder and destruction in many parts of the world, will now be used against us. This is the strategic message from the exercise. It is also an attempt to blackmail China.


China warns the US


In addition to the islands in the South China Sea, there is another, probably much more important, stumbling block between China and the United States - Taiwan. The same, recognized 40-50 years ago, the Republic of China of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek. China considers the island to be its own. This provision is enshrined in the PRC Constitution. The Americans, on the other hand, consider Taiwan an independent state, although since 1971 its representatives have not been members of the UN.

The island is 150 km from the mainland. This allows, in case of recognition of Taiwan as a state, to draw a line of demarcation along the Taiwan Strait. And, accordingly, use the 70 miles that will go to Taiwan as a place for the possible basing of US ships. Today this lineage only exists in the minds of Americans and islanders.

One episode of confrontation between the PRC and the United States, which happened quite recently, is associated with Taiwan. The PLA Air Force has published a two-minute video in the style of Japanese anime about the battle for an island on which the US Army base is located. According to several experts from the United States, this is the Andersen Air Force Base in Guam.

The Chinese strategic bomber N-6 strikes at the base with missiles similar to the Soviet Kh-55. Many of those interested in PLA aircraft chuckled. The Soviet Tu-16 is a thunderstorm for the Americans ... In fact, there is not much Soviet left in the N-6. The Chinese changed the glider, installed Russian engines, installed modern electronics, which turned the plane into a really dangerous enemy. And the Soviet X-2000 missiles (55 pieces) found in Ukraine in the early 6s were successfully copied by Chinese engineers.

The end of this agitation is especially good. After striking the base, the music is suddenly interrupted and after the roar of explosions, a voice-over is heard: "We are defenders of the air security of the Motherland and are always ready to stand up to protect its skies!"

It seems that what you have just read is some kind of relic of the Soviet era, transferred to another country. But let's look at this cartoon from the other side. This is not a blow to some abstract enemy, this is a blow to the US troops. This is no less a sign that the Chinese have also decided on the enemy than the chevrons of American soldiers in the exercises of the US 3rd Fleet.

Americans really do not want China to become a technologically advanced country with a good army and a strong economy. And the Chinese want it. So the scenario is quite shaping up. Bad script.

Instead of an epilogue


What I described in this material is just the fruit of reflections on the possible development of the situation in the world. The script is dark, from the series "if you want to live in peace, prepare for war." But we must be prepared for any development of events. We must understand the essence of what is happening around.

Tell the residents of Nagorno-Karabakh that there are no fools in the world today who are capable of starting a war, including a world war. As well as the fact that the people will not go to war for mythical oligarchs, money bags and other political adventurers. Go straight to the military registration and enlistment office in Yerevan or Baku and tell us.

I really want this material to cause a sarcastic smile from readers in a few years: “Well, the author, well, he did it. There are such idiots ... "Nobody wants to fight, and for some reason wars accompany the history of mankind since the inception of this very mankind ...
Author:
Photos used:
Military Material
154 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pessimist22
    Pessimist22 4 October 2020 06: 03
    +9
    The United States is trying to weaken China economically, they do not want to fight, Russia is also weakened economically, while trying to drag us into some kind of war, Georgia, Ukraine, Armenia, if suddenly they succeed, then their vassals from Poland, Ukraine, the Baltic states, are also on us will pounce. Therefore, you need to be ready and make it clear to the leadership of these countries that we will specifically shower them with Iskander and Caliber.
    1. bistrov.
      bistrov. 4 October 2020 08: 49
      +2
      Quote: Pessimist22
      then their vassals from Poland, Ukraine, the Baltic states, will also attack us.

      I do not think that anyone now has intentions to fight with Russia. In the Baltics only Lithuania has 19 thousand troops, while Latvia and Estonia have 6500 and 6400, respectively. Not a single Baltic country has any aviation, navy or heavy weapons. "Ukraine" although it has 250 thousand troops, but practically no aviation, and heavy equipment and artillery are extremely worn out and are of little use in Poland 128 thousand military personnel, heavy equipment and the aviation is of different caliber, the fleet consists of 5 outdated submarines.
      To fight them with the modern Armed Forces of Russia is simply suicide.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 4 October 2020 09: 29
        +2
        Quote: bistrov.
        To fight them with the modern Armed Forces of Russia is simply suicide.

        The suicide knows that he is going to die, but he still gets into the loop. Their psyche is not a normal person, suicide.
      2. Ros 56
        Ros 56 4 October 2020 09: 56
        +3
        Well, why do you humiliate them so much, bark then, they bark, but how loudly. They think the boys will support them around the corner, and the boys will give them a crack and pass by.
        1. Johann Klassen
          Johann Klassen 4 October 2020 19: 55
          0
          And why those who consider themselves to be "chosen by God, not conquerable, and the only correct outrageous" never even try to think about how "eternal lawlessness" can end for them.
          It is possible that no one is tired of living, even not very well.
          But why did the author not notice in his article that today, for some reason, many simply don’t think about it.
          Even seeing how often hundreds and thousands of people fall ill and die, for example from the "Coronavirus pandemic".
          But the Coronavirus pandemic did not appear at all "empty space".
          "Such small" losses are considered by many to be "quite acceptable", neglecting generally accepted "security measures".
          Health, to you and your family and friends.
          1. vVvAD
            vVvAD 5 October 2020 19: 09
            0
            Because they do not care about the fate of people, that their relatives have only gotten rich and continue to get rich in wars, because they proceed from their impunity and the ability to avoid court for their actions, as they avoid it now, which creates the illusion of permissiveness, because many of they have already moved on to the idea of ​​world power and the perversions they propagate.
            The quality of modern Western elites says only one thing: you can only talk to them with a pistol in your hand. Because before, even without a pistol, they understood that there was one, but now, apparently, the owners have completely run out of patience, and they do not care about the fate of the performers - these are also in decadence - they do not mind such - they are still choosing.
      3. Evgeny Ivanov_5
        Evgeny Ivanov_5 4 October 2020 10: 21
        +4
        Remind from this that the First World War began? From the war between Austria-Hungary and Serbia.
      4. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 4 October 2020 12: 39
        +7
        Quote: bistrov.
        I do not think that anyone now has intentions to fight with Russia. In the Baltics only Lithuania has 19 thousand troops, while Latvia and Estonia have 6500 and 6400, respectively. Not a single Baltic country has any aviation, navy or heavy weapons. "Ukraine" although it has 250 thousand troops, but practically no aviation, and heavy equipment and artillery are extremely worn out and are of little use in Poland 128 thousand military personnel, heavy equipment and the aviation is of different caliber, the fleet consists of 5 outdated submarines.
        To fight them with the modern Armed Forces of Russia is simply suicide.

        So after all, no one for them the role of winners and does not envisage, and for the role of provocateurs who can launch the implementation of a scenario of war in the European theater of military operations, they will fit perfectly. A pistol shot by a student Gavrila Principles by Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, was the trigger for a war in which millions died and three empires collapsed.
        The beneficiary, anyway, is mattresses, because they will bleed their two competitors - Europe and Russia, for a long time canceling all plans for the development of economic cooperation, with all gas pipelines, the Silk Roads and a single economic space from Lisbon to Vladivostok. In addition, they will not be able to profit from the ruins of a defeated enemy, and who it will be, Russia or Europe, is not important for them, despite the fact that their priority would be the defeat of Russia, but nevertheless, they will not disdain the corpse of his "ally", as it was after the Second World War.
      5. Mezabralis
        Mezabralis 8 October 2020 09: 54
        -2
        The key question is why Europe or the US should try to attack Russia. There are no serious territorial claims or other reasons. The only reason for the tension is Russia's imperial aspirations. They will disappear - peace and friendship will come. The only thing Russia should be wary of militarily is Kitai.
    2. businessv
      businessv 4 October 2020 21: 48
      +1
      Quote: Pessimist22
      The United States is trying to weaken China economically, they do not want to fight, Russia is also weakened economically, while trying to drag us into some kind of war, Georgia, Ukraine, Armenia,
      Striped people always do this after the Second World War, thanks to which they were able to overcome the consequences of the Great Depression.
  2. Don karleone
    Don karleone 4 October 2020 06: 04
    +3
    Phantasmagoria Yes, we must look into the future and learn from yesterday. But to live with fears, then it’s like paranoia, schizophrenia, and then the war is close at hand
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 4 October 2020 06: 45
      0

      I really want this material to cause a sarcastic smile from readers in a few years: “Well, the author, well, he did it. There are such ... "
      I think, "several years" will not have to wait, there is a countdown for minutes. I am ready to argue.
    2. Shuttle
      Shuttle 4 October 2020 08: 13
      +7
      Quote: Don Karleone
      Phantasmagoria Yes, we must look into the future and learn from yesterday. But to live with fears, then it’s like paranoia, schizophrenia, and then the war is close at hand

      Do-do-do ...
      Remember? There is a short break between the First and Second.
      So while there was a really big dinosaur in the world of the USSR, there was relative silence. He was not a vegetarian, but he did not allow the overthrow of governments with the help of unpunished bombing. This dinosaur was gone and it started off again. Of course, Russia also has his skull with huge teeth in the form of a nuclear shield. But modern Russia itself is not the USSR. It can be formally and is still a union of republics, maybe even someday it will take back someone. But its foundation is definitely not Soviet (based on advice from workers and peasants), and certainly not socialist.
      So we do not have peace now, but really too long interbellum. Because the capitalists have no other radical means of solving the inevitable problems of development other than to beat each other's faces with the help of their workers.
  3. Far B
    Far B 4 October 2020 06: 05
    13
    A messy article. I did not understand who would fight with whom and when. It is not new that America and China (and Russia) are conducting exercises and building up their army muscles, it has always been so. To say that this is a sign of preparation for a big war is a pretty stretch. And conflicts like the Karabakh conflict have always flared up in different parts of the planet and will always flare up. And this certainly cannot be called a starting point.
    1. Ragnar Lodbrok
      Ragnar Lodbrok 4 October 2020 06: 55
      12
      Because of Karabakh, the third world war will certainly not start, but rather because of resources, water, land ...
      1. Skif
        Skif 4 October 2020 19: 36
        +4
        And when did the wars begin because of something else? All old resources, sales markets, spheres of influence. And different Karabakhs are just an excuse.
    2. The leader of the Redskins
      The leader of the Redskins 4 October 2020 07: 07
      -2
      Personally, I am pleased with one observation - reading this author, I realize that he is not a successful predictor. Not Cassandra, in general.
      Therefore, I will go and make myself some coffee - the American army will definitely not knock on the door of my apartment in the near future.
      Good morning everyone.
    3. Svarog
      Svarog 4 October 2020 08: 52
      0
      Quote: Dalny V
      A messy article. I still did not understand who would fight with whom and when exactly

      As I understand it, everyone will fight with everyone ... but the United States is interested in China and the weakening of Europe .. the United States has no special species for Russia .. judging by the article .. What is generally correct, Russia is degrading and after years it will become a full-fledged African state. .. There is no point in fighting with us, you can only accelerate the process of degradation by weakening the Russian Federation by local wars along the perimeter of the borders, which is now happening.
      I do not think that the United States is interested in weakening Europe, Europe in the capitalist paradigm will always depend on the United States, there is simply a huge sales market.
      But the United States will really try to weaken China with all its might, and it may even come to war ..
      But knowing the Chinese, they will come to an agreement with the United States ..
      As a result, there will be no world wars, at least in the next 10 years. The United States continues to divide and rule, Russia is still degrading, China is no longer showing the same growth rates (the United States has achieved its goal) and in the future, the growth of China's development will only slow down, and Europe is quite stable.
      1. Tektor
        Tektor 5 October 2020 16: 07
        +1
        As I understood the general idea of ​​the author, the states cannot cope with the combined forces of Russia and China. Therefore, they intend to divide us. The states want to drag Russia into some kind of turmoil, and throw more participants. For example, now they will exclude Turkey from NATO and force the Turks to start a war with Armenia. She is in the CSTO, and we will be obliged to get involved. Then they will aggravate the situation in Kosovo ... And we will be obliged to solve problems there. Then Bukra will begin to play the role of a suicide bomber. Tribalts and Sweden will be connected to the bookr. And Japan begins to approach the Kuril Islands. Well, here's a 3000 km front. Under this batch, the states are organizing a run over to China beyond Taiwan or some other "atoll", hoping that the Russian Federation will not be able to provide effective assistance to China.
    4. figwam
      figwam 4 October 2020 08: 54
      +4
      Quote: Dalny V
      A messy article. I did not understand who would fight with whom and when.

      Well, if the United States globally drags Europe into a war with Russia, and they themselves start a war with China, then neither China, nor Russia will be able to help China.
      1. lucul
        lucul 4 October 2020 09: 44
        +3
        Well, if the United States globally drags Europe into a war with Russia, and they themselves start a war with China, then neither China, nor Russia will be able to help China.

        Well, at least one of them caught the essence of the article)))
        The rest did not master the chaos)))
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 4 October 2020 06: 17
    +9
    these events clearly lead to a deterioration in relations between the CSTO and NATO
    Let's speak directly - between Russia and NATO. The CSTO members themselves rely only on Russia, but to be honest, Russia needs to rely only on itself. On paper, the collective security treaty looks great, but in real life?
    1. Dimy4
      Dimy4 4 October 2020 07: 09
      15
      On paper, the collective security treaty looks great, but in real life?

      And in life, Russia, you MUST protect us and feed us if something happens. Well, then we will repay you ... with declarations of occupation.
      1. Ragnar Lodbrok
        Ragnar Lodbrok 4 October 2020 07: 24
        +5
        Quote: Dimy4
        Russia, you MUST

        Russia owes nothing to anyone.
        We owe half the world.
    2. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 4 October 2020 07: 23
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      On paper, the collective security treaty looks great, but in real life?

      And this is as always. It was smooth on paper, but they forgot about the ravines
  5. Sergey Obraztsov
    Sergey Obraztsov 4 October 2020 06: 27
    +6
    Someone clever said - Politics is a concentrated expression of economics. The economy is essentially the interests of national elites. And neither America's elites nor China's elites need a war or even a local conflict with China “for all the money”. These countries have too much trade with each other. And everyone makes money on this. Let alone the fact that this hypothetical mess may well end the era of the current global economy. With the dominance of the dollar, the "endless" printing presses of the Fed and the Eurozone, debts of countries in the size of annual GDP and money out of thin air for investment companies and pension funds by inflating the capitalization of Apple, Tesla and a bunch of others. Who needs it?
    Only fanatics can start such a war. And they will not be allowed to the helm neither in the USA nor in China for a cannon shot. And there is no such hatred between these countries as between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
  6. polar fox
    polar fox 4 October 2020 06: 45
    +4
    today is nonsense, tomorrow's reality. (c)
  7. mark1
    mark1 4 October 2020 06: 58
    +2
    The role of nuclear weapons in modern realities not only has not diminished, but has increased dramatically. This is the "scrap" against the technological and industrial superiority of the West against which there is no admission.
  8. Lipchanin
    Lipchanin 4 October 2020 07: 20
    0
    No one wants to fight, and for some reason wars accompany the history of mankind since the inception of this very mankind ...

    Yes, right into the hole
  9. nikvic46
    nikvic46 4 October 2020 07: 26
    +2
    The dream of Gorbachev and Yeltsin that in the future we would live in an embrace with America and the West collapsed into dust. Then another crisis arrived. And the contradictions all over the world increased as never before. And so that the peoples did not worry, their moods should be translated into military rails. Think for yourself, no matter which country this crisis would affect.
  10. parusnik
    parusnik 4 October 2020 07: 37
    +2
    I especially liked about the "mythical oligarchs and moneybags", of course they are completely absent in Russia, like Renault-Nissan-VAZ, Ford, Koki and Pepsiko factories, RusAl, which is of the Russian type, there are no foreign citizens on the boards of directors of gas and oil companies and etc ... Explain why our "partners", as they are now called, bombard Russia with rockets: Moscow, Moscow, we throw bombs, you will have the Olympics. Yhohoho ... It is enough to declare tougher sanctions, not to supply to Russia what the country does not produce from the word and cannot produce at all. And there are many such things. Because the policy in the country is like that, everything should bring benefits. Mathematics, for example. And you shouldn't confuse the Karabakh conflict here at all. An ethnic conflict, as in Rwanda ... between Tutsis and Hutu ...
    1. The eye of the crying
      The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 12: 31
      -1
      Quote: parusnik
      Moscow, Moscow, we will throw bombs, you will have the Olympics. Yhohoho ...


      Do you know that it was a children's horror story from the Soviet era? smile

      And here's what it really sung about:


      Moscow - city of mystery, so full of history, noble and old
      Mm-mm-mm-mm-mm-mm-mm-Moscow, there is a burning fire
      That never will expire, deep in your soul
      1. Sergey M. Karasev
        Sergey M. Karasev 4 October 2020 13: 03
        0
        And why then was "Genghis Khan" banned here?
        1. The eye of the crying
          The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 13: 11
          0
          Quote: Sergey Karasev
          And why then was "Genghis Khan" banned here?


          Yes, no difference. Do you dispute the quote? The full lyrics are easily googled. There are many stamps about vodka, but no "bombing".
          1. Sergey M. Karasev
            Sergey M. Karasev 4 October 2020 13: 15
            +1
            I guess that if they wanted to sing this song for the first time in Moscow at the opening of the Olympics, then there was not even a hint about the bomb. I was just interested in this question, but I could not find an answer.
            1. Avior
              Avior 4 October 2020 15: 46
              +1
              For the Olympics 80, a cover version was recorded in Russian performed by Sofia Rotaru.
              But because of the boycott at the Olympics did not sound
      2. domokl
        4 October 2020 13: 24
        +3
        Big plus ... First time I read the person who translated the words of this song
      3. parusnik
        parusnik 4 October 2020 14: 07
        0
        I know this horror story, that's why I inserted it into the text of the commentary. And I know what it is really singing about. On the whole commentary, what do you disagree with?
        1. The eye of the crying
          The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 14: 14
          -2
          Quote: parusnik
          On the whole comment, what do you disagree with.?


          If "in general" you wanted to say that "they are annoyingly declaring us sanctions", then this is about the level of "throwing bombs, yohoho".
          1. parusnik
            parusnik 4 October 2020 15: 24
            +2
            "out of their malice they announce sanctions to us"
            And where is that in my commentary? ... They don't need to throw bombs at Russia when they already have almost everything in their hands. It's not for nothing that foreign companies are more and more attracted to cooperation in order to fill the vacuum that they themselves we cannot fill in. Here they fill.
            1. The eye of the crying
              The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 15: 26
              0
              Could you summarize what you wanted to say "in general"?
              1. parusnik
                parusnik 4 October 2020 15: 33
                +2
                And it is written in the commentary, formulated, and in the second.
  11. Olgovich
    Olgovich 4 October 2020 08: 05
    0
    No one wants to fight, and for some reason wars accompany the history of mankind since the inception of this very mankind ...

    Western Europeans can no longer be driven to war with any gingerbreads and whips, they work mainly in offices under air conditioning.

    They are happy to pay someone for the war, but to fight ... No.
  12. Boris55
    Boris55 4 October 2020 08: 07
    +1
    Quote: A. Staver
    ... the people will not go to fight for mythical oligarchs, moneybags and other political adventurers.

    For them - no, but for the state - yes. During the coexistence of Russia (Russia, USSR, Russia) there were many rulers: princes, tsars, general secretaries, presidents (fewer - but there were), and Russia stood and will stand.

    The state is not only the violence of the minority over the majority, as Karl Marx wrote about, but also the system of people's survival, the preservation of identity, language and culture. "We don't need a world without Russia." What happens to the Russians when they sell the state for the mythical "lace panties" we see in Ukraine - there Russians are outlawed. Whether we want it here at home - no. This is what we will fight for. For speaking Russian, living in Russian, and raising your children and grandchildren in Russian.

    As for the citizens you listed, at the first threat to their lives, they fled abroad, which they have repeatedly demonstrated by fleeing to England and other countries. So, if we do not want to destroy Russia, then we should not concentrate on their attention - this only weakens our spirit in confrontation with enemies. Diverts our attention to secondary goals.
  13. Livonetc
    Livonetc 4 October 2020 08: 10
    +1
    "The United States Prepares for World War II."
    Until they are able to prepare.
    Everything that is now being produced in the United States, even in foreign policy, is aimed at an internal audience.
    The United States is now in unprecedented disarray.
    The real international agenda will be shaped by stabilization within themselves.
    While the gendarme is knocked down, and slapped him himself.
    1. Essex62
      Essex62 4 October 2020 08: 56
      +3
      The Yankees are quite capable of fighting China. The relics have not been accumulated in a measure. If the puppeteers secure the internal disassembly, the Negroes, with the Latinos, will consolidate with the white race overnight. And the Russian Federation will bite on the outskirts and decompose from the inside. There are many more tools than in the days of the USSR.
      Natives of the gangster 90s, creaking muscles, at the helm do not last forever, others are already replacing. These will surrender everything.
      1. Livonetc
        Livonetc 4 October 2020 09: 04
        0
        The war with China will hit the United States hard.
        Economic ties are too serious.
        Until they do it.
        Again, they will bite China with foreign "false" jaws.
        Well, and of course they will give jaws to anyone.
    2. Hypertension
      Hypertension 4 October 2020 12: 44
      +2
      Quote: Livonetc
      The real international agenda will be shaped by stabilization within themselves.
      While the gendarme is knocked down, and slapped him himself.

      Do not forget that the most "effective" way to solve internal problems is to create a small / big victorious war.
  14. Vitaly Tsymbal
    Vitaly Tsymbal 4 October 2020 08: 30
    0
    This topic will have to be raised following the results of the elections in the United States - the threat of a world war comes from the United States. There is no such country in the world, except for the United States, capable of unleashing a new world ... Trump will be in power - armed conflicts will continue to smolder, if Biden - the threat of world war increases significantly.
  15. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 4 October 2020 08: 40
    -1
    Until there is a technology for 100% interception of vigorous "loaves" no one will fight globally. Comrade Yn's vigorous loaves are a confirmation of this. hi
    1. cniza
      cniza 4 October 2020 12: 12
      +2
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Until there is a technology for 100% interception of vigorous "loaves" no one will fight globally. Comrade Yn's vigorous loaves are a confirmation of this. hi


      And this is not possible to achieve, since the speakers are constantly improving ... only some hotheads hope for a crushing preemptive strike, after which there will be no response. As soon as their computer gives such a calculation, they will inflict no doubt ...
    2. Hypertension
      Hypertension 4 October 2020 12: 42
      0
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Comrade Eun's 10 vigorous loaves are proof of that.

      The absence of oil and a real threat to the United States from Comrade Eun (by the way, where is he? Evil tongues say that he has already gone to the country of the eternal Juche) confirmation of this.
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 4 October 2020 12: 49
        0
        Alive of all alive Wished Trump a speedy recovery.
        1. Hypertension
          Hypertension 4 October 2020 12: 58
          -1
          Trump will get well. Health, as you know, you can buy ̶н̶е̶. In our time. It would be what. Trump has something to do. But the "progressive" medicine of the DPRK is questionable ...
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 4 October 2020 13: 14
            -1
            For Trump, his health is cloudy, and Eun has an iron curtain, he is in the house.
            1. Hypertension
              Hypertension 4 October 2020 13: 28
              0
              Eun with his diabetes is already at risk. Don't you think that admiring the ruler of a poor, third-rate country, even if a country friendly to Russia, is bad manners? Seriously? What is the DPRK? Elusive (to the West) Joe. Which nafig nobody needs and only begs for humanitarian aid by means of nuclear blackmail. This is a laughing stock for the whole world.
  16. Arlen
    Arlen 4 October 2020 09: 55
    +3
    the words will sound scary, but the world is ready for war.

    The world was ready for a new world war and immediately after the end of World War II.
    Are there today among NATO members and any "graduate students" those who, with appropriate financial and military injections, are capable of starting a war against Russia?

    There is, for example, Poland.
    Are there forces in NATO capable of waging a conventional war with the Russians?

    The entire European Union.
    Finally, are there nuclear weapons in Europe?

    There is. France, Great Britain.

    The only thing holding back Europe and the United States from attacking Russia is our weapons of mass destruction. Will they attack Russia? No. With such a politics and economy, we will defeat ourselves without them. The events in Ukraine and Belarus are proof of this. Our fifth column, represented by supporters of the protest opposition a la bulk, is ready to destroy and sell to the West absolutely everything, just like today's "our" oligarchs. Only the RCWP and VKPB can lead the country out of the impasse and make Russia a great country again.
    1. Tank hard
      Tank hard 4 October 2020 11: 07
      -3
      Quote: Arlen
      Only the RCWP and VKPB can lead the country out of the deadlock and make Russia a Great country again.

      These or what ?! Listen to what they say! It's tough! fool
      1. Arlen
        Arlen 4 October 2020 11: 41
        +6
        Quote: Tank Hard
        These or what ?!

        You either did not carefully read my commentary, or you are not aware that there are other communist parties besides the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

        Yes, even the Communist Party, everything will be better than under today's bourgeois-oligarchic system.
        1. Tank hard
          Tank hard 4 October 2020 12: 16
          -5
          Quote: Arlen
          or you are not aware that besides the Communist Party there are other communist parties.

          I have always believed that the communists should have one party, and that the communists were divided into several parties, suggests that the communist party is already dead in essence. And all kinds of necromancy do not interest me.
          Quote: Arlen
          Yes, even the Communist Party, everything will be better than under today's bourgeois-oligarchic system.

          These inadequacies can lead the country only to the next collapse, the video actually shows this, how can a sane individual say that? And Zyuganov has already traded in the electorate who believed in him, no one will believe this anymore. You live in the world of your illusions, and every day this world is shrinking .. request
  17. silver_roman
    silver_roman 4 October 2020 10: 29
    +1
    our main task is to keep the borders in order. by the word "borders" I mean the countries bordering on Russia. What is happening in Karabakh is a rather alarming bell. the main thing is not to be drawn into another conflict, into which they have tried to drag us more than once. And oddly enough with the Turks. I would like to understand who is behind Erdogan and his extremely daring actions. As for Europe, now there is no full-fledged coordinated force capable of a military adventure against the Russian Federation. I admit of course an attempt to take away Kaliningrad, but this is a military conflict that will take place on the land of the Europeans themselves. in general, diplomacy is the only acceptable way of waging war, oddly enough. and good diplomacy with a good army behind you is an excellent guarantee of both peace and victories.
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 4 October 2020 13: 00
      +4
      Quote: silver_roman
      the main thing is not to be drawn into another conflict, into which they have tried to drag us more than once.

  18. Ivan Tixiy
    Ivan Tixiy 4 October 2020 11: 03
    +1
    The author has a strange vision and vision. I agree that the world is ready for war. The reason is simple, the Western economy will die without being fed by another war and these countries will plunge into chaos, or rather plunge, some more noticeably some less. Karabakh and the possible defrosting of other conflicts are half measures. In the US, there is a struggle between those who do not want a general nuclear war and those who are ready for absolutely anything in order to maintain the status quo. But the questions - where will it start, who will be with whom? This is from the field of fortune telling, refer to Globe or Nostradamus, better to Baba Vanga. There are explanations for every taste until the end of time
    ,
  19. iouris
    iouris 4 October 2020 11: 17
    -1
    Erunda. Now they are no longer at war. Wars are played without gunshots. And the "red lines" ... they disappeared. Together with ideology and principles. Losing the war means impoverishing the broad masses of the losing side. Those. redistribution. And you: the market, the market.
    1. cniza
      cniza 4 October 2020 12: 08
      +3
      Quote: iouris
      And the "red lines" ... they disappeared. Together with ideology and principles.


      If we consigned to oblivion our ideology, without accepting anything in return, this does not mean that our adversary abandoned his ...
      1. iouris
        iouris 4 October 2020 12: 12
        0
        I did not say anything about the enemy (competitor for the right to live). He understands everything correctly. He has a science that gives recommendations: what place should you get to in order to kill the enth elephant with one shot. This is ideology.
        1. cniza
          cniza 4 October 2020 12: 16
          +1
          I will probably repeat myself, but as soon as their computer finds such a place and confirms that the target will be destroyed, they will fire without hesitation ...
  20. cniza
    cniza 4 October 2020 12: 06
    +1
    The script is dark, from the series "if you want to live in peace, prepare for war." But we must be prepared for any development of events. We must understand the essence of what is happening around.


    It has always been relevant and should be on the agenda every day ...
  21. The eye of the crying
    The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 12: 26
    0
    drone MQ-9 Reaper, better known to a wide range of readers as the "Reaper of Darkness".


    Certainly not all. He is known to some as "The Mournful Reaper" or, suddenly, "Death with a scythe."
  22. Hypertension
    Hypertension 4 October 2020 12: 38
    +1
    Is the author a science fiction writer? Reproduces the long-worn plastics of the world apocalypse? May be. But then answer the author a couple of questions. Are there today among NATO members and any "graduate students" those who, with appropriate financial and military injections, are capable of starting a war against Russia? Are there forces in NATO capable of waging a conventional war with the Russians? Finally, are there nuclear weapons in Europe?

    It turns out that the fantast ...
    And why does the Author compare individual NATO members with Russia? It's kind of like a collective block.
    Europe has nuclear weapons. France and Great Britain.
    1. The eye of the crying
      The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 13: 14
      +2
      Quote: Hyperion
      Europe has nuclear weapons. France and Great Britain.


      Also from the USA and Russia.
      1. Hypertension
        Hypertension 4 October 2020 13: 19
        0
        Quote: Eye of the Crying
        Also from the USA and Russia.

        The US has bases, you are right. Russia, of course, also has, but there and then nuclear weapons against Russia are meant.
        1. The eye of the crying
          The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 13: 22
          0
          Quote: Hyperion
          but then nuclear weapons against Russia are meant.


          It just says "in Europe". I mean weapons against Russia or any that can be fought - I don't know.
    2. domokl
      4 October 2020 13: 32
      0
      Quote: Hyperion
      And why does the Author compare individual NATO members with Russia? It's kind of like a collective block.

      I wonder where you saw this. The attack will not be a crowd, but one or two dwarf states .. Those same "badass boys". The rest will appear from around the corner - "Thou did you offended a little?"
      1. Hypertension
        Hypertension 4 October 2020 13: 37
        0
        Quote: domokl
        I wonder where you saw this. The attack will not be a crowd, but one or two dwarf states .. Those same "badass boys". The rest will appear from around the corner - "Thou did you offended a little?"

        You yourself wrote - the rest will appear (pull up). And the battle went: Russia (alone, without Serbia, Belarus, the CSTO and the CIS (because they, at best, will send a couple of infantry battalions (read: cannon fodder))) against NATO. What's wrong?
        And about nuclear weapons - have you forgotten about France and Britain with American bases?
        1. The eye of the crying
          The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 14: 06
          0
          Quote: Hyperion
          Russia (alone, without Serbia, Belarus, the Collective Security Treaty Organization and the CIS (because they, at best, will send a couple of infantry battalions (read: cannon fodder))) against NATO. What's wrong?


          Why does NATO need it? If the "badass boys" climb, the NATO charter does not oblige you to fit in for them.
          1. Hypertension
            Hypertension 4 October 2020 14: 22
            0
            Quote: Eye of the Crying
            Why does NATO need it? If the "badass boys" climb, the NATO charter does not oblige you to fit in for them.

            And what "badass boys" will rock the boat against Russia without the knowledge, support and cunning plan of NATO's "main violins"? Tribalts? What for, one wonders? They would have to keep the population and they have no territorial claims to Russia. Who, apart from NATO, will turn to Russia? Turkey? Having in NATO itself ill-wishers in the person of France and Greece? No. If they are going to attack Russia, then all in a crowd. Not as the author of the article fantasizes - one by one.
            1. The eye of the crying
              The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 14: 39
              -1
              Quote: Hyperion
              And what "badass boys" will rock the boat against Russia without the knowledge, support and cunning plan of NATO's "main violins"? Tribalts? What for, one wonders?


              I have no idea.

              Quote: Hyperion
              Who, apart from NATO, will turn to Russia?


              I do not see anyone who would have poked themselves into Russia even without leaving NATO. Because I don't see why NATO needs a war with Russia.
              1. Hypertension
                Hypertension 4 October 2020 17: 30
                0
                Duc, The author writes that, they say, individual countries will start, and the rest will catch up. Like NATO has a plan.
                And you, Zmagar Zmagarych, can answer a personal question: Will you take power from Old Man, delegate to a housewife with a lard? Do you think life will become better and more fun?
                1. The eye of the crying
                  The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 17: 33
                  -3
                  Quote: Hyperion
                  Can you answer a personal question: Will you take power from Old Man, delegate to a housewife with a lard?


                  The housewife promised to hold an election and leave. And I tend to believe her much more than the self-appointed president. However, you don't have to worry - your dad seems to be sitting down.
                  1. Hypertension
                    Hypertension 4 October 2020 17: 46
                    0
                    Yes, he is not mine, Old Man ... He himself is not delighted with the "overstaying" ... But what is the alternative? Vacuum and anarchy. To whom will the housewife transfer power? Do you know? A wizard who waves his wand and will be happy? That's it ... The choice between Scylla and Charybdis ...
                    1. The eye of the crying
                      The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 17: 50
                      0
                      Quote: Hyperion
                      To whom will the housewife transfer power?


                      You seem to have missed the word "choices" in my previous answer.
                      1. Hypertension
                        Hypertension 4 October 2020 18: 07
                        0
                        Quote: Eye of the Crying
                        You seem to have missed the word "choices" in my previous answer.

                        So you have had elections?
                      2. The eye of the crying
                        The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 18: 21
                        0
                        I would ask you who won them and how do you know this, but it is already clear that this will be a waste of time.
                      3. Hypertension
                        Hypertension 4 October 2020 18: 24
                        +1
                        You would ask, and I would answer. From official sources, 80% are for Lukashenka.
                        It is a waste of time that flowers are popping at the riot policemen and shouts of "Father go away." That's what a waste of time is.
                      4. The eye of the crying
                        The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 18: 33
                        0
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        It’s a waste of time, it’s popping flowers to riot policemen and shouting “Father go away”


                        You know better from the couch.
                      5. Hypertension
                        Hypertension 4 October 2020 18: 47
                        0
                        Some on the couch, and some on the flat with a battered booty. And if there is no difference, then why sacrifice the booty?
                      6. The eye of the crying
                        The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 19: 00
                        0
                        Take care of your ass. It is necessary for sitting on the sofa.
                      7. Hypertension
                        Hypertension 4 October 2020 19: 07
                        0
                        Quote: Eye of the Crying
                        Take care of your ass. It is necessary for sitting on the sofa.

                        Gold words. Thanks for the kind advice. And to you - alaverdi: read Lenin Vladimir Ilyich.
        2. Selevc
          Selevc 7 October 2020 07: 31
          0
          Quote: Hyperion
          But what is the alternative? Vacuum and anarchy. To whom will the housewife transfer power? Do you know? A wizard who waves his wand and will be happy?

          Not even a vacuum and anarchy, but if the protesters win, there will be an indicative punishment for the whole of Belarus ... Who ??? The authors of the punishment will disown and nod at Honduras south of this country !!!

          Then the next 10-20 years Belarusians will only count losses - and the losses will be both collective and personally for each Belarusian ... They will count as the whole country and each separately !!!
  • ZEMCH
    ZEMCH 4 October 2020 14: 27
    0
    Quote: Hyperion
    And why does the Author compare individual NATO members with Russia? It's kind of like a collective block.

    Because the United States will not fight Russia directly, they will sneeze for paragraph 5, they will help with the supply of weapons and equipment. Thus, solving a bunch of their problems:
    1. The weakening of the economies of Europe;
    2. Utilizing old, accumulated weapons that are not compatible with new equipment;
    3. Diversion of Russia to fight with neighbors and non-interference in the war with China;
    4. Ultimately, remain the most powerful country, both in economy and politics.
    You can set anyone you like on Russia - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and of course Ukraine)))
    1. Hypertension
      Hypertension 4 October 2020 14: 35
      0
      Quote: ZEMCH
      Because the United States will not fight Russia directly

      Has this already been reported to you, or is it purely your opinion? Where does such a clear plan of action come from? Excuse me, but Article 5 of the NATO Treaty reads: “The Contracting Parties agree that an armed attack on one or more of them in Europe or North America will be considered an attack on them in general, and therefore agree that in the event that such an armed attack takes place, each of them, in order to exercise the right to individual or collective self-defense recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist a Contracting Party "
      Or do you think that Russia is destined only to fight back on its territory in the event of external aggression?
      1. ZEMCH
        ZEMCH 4 October 2020 14: 48
        0
        Quote: Hyperion
        Has this already been reported to you, or is it purely your opinion? Where does such a clear plan of action come from? Excuse me, but Article 5 of the NATO Treaty reads: “The Contracting Parties agree that an armed attack on one or more of them in Europe or North America will be considered an attack on them in general, and therefore agree that in the event that such an armed attack takes place, each of them, in order to exercise the right to individual or collective self-defense recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist a Contracting Party "
        Or do you think that Russia is destined only to fight back on its territory in the event of external aggression?

        Verified information! As for the 5th article, the Russian Federation will not attack these countries, but according to the plans it will get involved in hostilities. Here's an example of a development:
        1. "Democratic forces" in the person of the Polish, Baltic forces introduce police forces to protect democracy in Belarus. And there, by the fall, a lot of labor is released from the fields)). For the money of the "democratizers" they start "Maidan". Old man will start to disperse and here, just help.
        2. By any means play off Turkey and Russia in the Caucasus. The options are huge.
        3. Ukraine is generally a monkey with a grenade.
        1. Hypertension
          Hypertension 4 October 2020 14: 50
          0
          Quote: ZEMCH
          Verified information!

          Can you name the date, "Comrade Sorge"?
          1. ZEMCH
            ZEMCH 4 October 2020 14: 55
            0
            For the buildup of Belarus for two or three months. On shells and mines falling on the territory of Turkey, it depends on the rationality of Armenia, While the hostilities are on the territory of Azerbaijan, if Armenia gets involved from its territory, then a week
            1. Hypertension
              Hypertension 4 October 2020 15: 03
              0
              I did not see the NATO attack on Russia. Don't blame me ...
          2. ZEMCH
            ZEMCH 4 October 2020 15: 01
            0
            We can no longer send planes to base 102 in Gyumri, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Turkey have closed the airspace, and I cannot say yet about Iran. But as soon as the DBs move to the territory of Armenia, then Turkey and the Russian Federation have allied obligations, and note against each other)))
            1. The eye of the crying
              The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 15: 06
              0
              Quote: ZEMCH
              We can no longer send planes to the 102nd base in Gyumri, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Turkey have closed the airspace, regarding Iran, I cannot say yet


              It’s strange to say that you don’t know about Iran yet, but you already know about "we cannot send".
            2. Hypertension
              Hypertension 4 October 2020 15: 12
              0
              Quote: ZEMCH
              about Iran, I can't say yet.

              As soon as you know, please beep. But I still cannot understand what has to do with NATO's war with Russia.
              1. ZEMCH
                ZEMCH 4 October 2020 15: 14
                0
                I did not mean NATO troops, but the troops of individual NATO member states, completing according to the same standard, which allows the United States to supply weapons to any theater of operations
                1. Hypertension
                  Hypertension 4 October 2020 15: 17
                  0
                  But since some NATO members will not fight with Russia, then all your dealings are about nothing, and to nothing. You need to think wider, wider ...
    2. The eye of the crying
      The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 14: 42
      0
      Quote: ZEMCH
      You can set anyone you like on Russia - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland,


      You made a funny joke about Estonia, Lithuania and Lithuania. Poland, too, will not stick it out, and it is not obliged to support the aggressive wars of its NATO members.

      Quote: ZEMCH
      well, Ukraine, of course)))


      Also a funny joke.
      1. ZEMCH
        ZEMCH 4 October 2020 15: 02
        0
        In every joke, only a fraction of a joke)))
        1. The eye of the crying
          The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 15: 04
          0
          In this joke, the share of the joke is, according to my estimate, 99.999%
          1. ZEMCH
            ZEMCH 4 October 2020 15: 17
            0
            As soon as part of the army or the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Belarus goes over to the side (supports) the protesters, then there will be no one to stop the neighbors
            1. The eye of the crying
              The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 15: 22
              +1
              If the army or the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Belarus goes over to the side of the protesters (which looks increasingly less likely), there will be even less sense to intervene than now.
      2. ZEMCH
        ZEMCH 4 October 2020 15: 47
        0
        Quote: Eye of the Crying
        You made a funny joke about Estonia, Lithuania and Lithuania. Poland, too, will not stick it out, and it is not obliged to support the aggressive wars of its NATO members.

        The Estonian government has approved additional measures and funding for the armed forces. These actions also imply the technical modernization of the coastline defense through the installation of surface-to-surface weapons. Tallinn is confident that this will allow the destruction of ships passing through the Gulf of Finland. The Estonian Defense Ministry expects to spend about € 2021 million to defend the country already in 645,4, which is significantly higher than the level recommended by the North Atlantic Alliance.

        Something like this, and NATO countries will supply weapons to them)))
        1. The eye of the crying
          The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 15: 49
          0
          You should have seen the size of the population of Estonia and its armed forces.
          1. ZEMCH
            ZEMCH 4 October 2020 16: 29
            0
            and where is the number? The US imposes sanctions against the Russian Federation for shipments from ports. Establishment of Estonia as watchmen, with the right of inspection (for the Americans before the lantern on the Maritime Convention, they did not sign it). Estonians are trying to check, we resist and oh))) we will injure a sailor of a NATO member state. We are "underdemocracy" for them. And here's a local crisis for you
            1. The eye of the crying
              The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 16: 31
              0
              Quote: ZEMCH
              and where is the number?


              Despite the fact that God is on the side of the large battalions.

              Quote: ZEMCH
              The United States imposes sanctions against the Russian Federation for shipments from ports. Estonia is established as the watchmen


              You are raving.

              Quote: ZEMCH
              oops))) we injure a sailor of a NATO member state


              AND? NATO suddenly fits into war with Russia?
              1. ZEMCH
                ZEMCH 4 October 2020 17: 05
                0
                Quote: Eye of the Crying
                You are raving.

                Belarus stops shipping from the Baltic ports, reorienting to Russian ones (Ust-Luga, St. Petersburg, Vyborg). All of them are in the Gulf of Finland, thereby "offending" non-Balts. For them, this is a fact of economic aggression, Ukraine "on its knees" asks to close the Black Sea ports (some congressmen are even very ready to support this topic)
                1. The eye of the crying
                  The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 17: 07
                  -2
                  Quote: ZEMCH
                  For them, this is a fact of economic aggression.


                  So what? NATO is under no obligation to counter "economic aggression".

                  Quote: ZEMCH
                  Ukraine "on its knees" asks to close the Black Sea ports (some congressmen are even very ready to support this topic)


                  AND? Who will close something - NATO? What for they need it. States? And what for them?
              2. ZEMCH
                ZEMCH 4 October 2020 17: 07
                0
                Quote: Eye of the Crying
                AND? NATO suddenly fits into war with Russia?

                The task of "occupying" the Russian Federation with problems in the economy and with its neighbors, so as not to "get into the affairs" of the United States
                1. The eye of the crying
                  The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 17: 10
                  0
                  Do you really think that the problems with Estnonia will occupy Russia?
                  1. ZEMCH
                    ZEMCH 4 October 2020 18: 48
                    +2
                    There is always something to occupy)). Navalny and Skripali, exaggerating Novice - the final is the expulsion from the OPCW, and the best thing for the United States, the vote for expulsion from the Security Council. The result, I think, is known only if China's veto will save))), but based on geopolitical alignments, it will abstain.
                    Someone accidentally spills phenol in thermal waters (or along currents in thermal waters of the Russian Federation). Phenol is not removed from biological organisms. All buying countries control phenol in products and, as a result, the RF is closed the way to foreign seafood markets for many years. In the Far East, seafood exports are 50% of the economy. (Does the situation in Kamchatka look like anything?) Japan, seeing the weakness of the Russian Federation, begins to select the northern territories (the Japanese leadership, which wanted to solve the problem peacefully, was displaced).
                    In the Caucasus, there is a war without a visible solution to the problem, each of the sides will emit complete domination in the NKR. In fact, now there are no our allies there and Pashinyan and Aliyev are not looking in our direction.
                    Iran - we have thrown it so many times that we simply do not trust it.
                    Syria - graters with the same Turkey, have not yet agreed)))
                    Libya - the situation is the same with the same participants, we add Egypt and the Arab League countries.
                    Ukraine simply dreams of deploying NATO bases on its territory.
                    Georgia is similar to Ukraine.
                    And who will support Russia? Army and Navy? I think you know the state of the fleet)))
                    The naval blockade was discussed in the US Congress last year, the desire to take over the NSR from the US has already been announced. Let me remind you once again that the United States has not signed the Maritime Convention.
                    I am not a scrapper, I analyze facts and information. All hope is for the Foreign Ministry)))
                    1. The eye of the crying
                      The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 19: 09
                      0
                      Quote: ZEMCH
                      There is always something to occupy)). Navalny and Skripali, exaggerating Novice - the final is exclusion from the OPCW, and the best thing for the United States, the vote for exclusion from the Security Council


                      Oh yes, the Skripals occupied Russia so, well, they occupied it - she did not know where to go.

                      Quote: ZEMCH
                      Someone accidentally spills phenol in thermal waters (or along currents in thermal waters of the Russian Federation)


                      Quote: ZEMCH
                      Does the situation in Kamchatka look like anything?


                      Reminds. From the Chernobyl accident to the Norilsk accident.

                      Quote: ZEMCH
                      I am not all-naughty, I analyze facts and information


                      And what does your analysis show? smile
                    2. ZEMCH
                      ZEMCH 4 October 2020 19: 15
                      +2
                      Quote: Eye of the Crying
                      And what does your analysis show?

                      to repeat situations

                      A team of US Navy Seals poses with the Russian flag taken during the arrest of the Volgoneft-147 tanker in the Persian Gulf. 2000 year
                    3. The eye of the crying
                      The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 19: 50
                      0
                      Quote: ZEMCH
                      The US Navy Seals team poses with the Russian flag taken during the detention of the Volgoneft-147 tanker.


                      Does your analysis show that Russian companies will again smuggle Iraqi oil? What for? LUKoil pumps it on completely legal grounds.
                    4. ZEMCH
                      ZEMCH 4 October 2020 20: 16
                      +1
                      No Russian ships will be detained under any pretext, find a case when the Russian Navy inspected someone else's ship for sanctions?
                    5. The eye of the crying
                      The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 20: 25
                      0
                      Quote: ZEMCH
                      Russian ships will be detained under any pretext


                      Here's a testable forecast. When and where will it start?
  • The eye of the crying
    The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 13: 12
    0
    I really want this material to cause a sarcastic smile from readers in a few years: “Well, the author, well, he did it. There are such ... "


    Will call. If in a few years someone starts reading this.
  • ZEMCH
    ZEMCH 4 October 2020 14: 19
    +1
    We recall the reason for the Opium Wars - the imbalance of the trade balance between Britain and China in favor of China, the reason for which was the Chinese policy of protecting the empire from foreign influence. The commodity that was in demand in China and could even out the balance of trade, bringing huge profits to the British, was opium, but its sale was prohibited by imperial decrees. By 1840, China had the largest foreign exchange reserves in the world.
    We listen to the rhetoric of the United States - the trade balance between the United States and China is skewed in favor of China, there is nothing new in the world)))
    Russia in this respect does not pose a threat to the United States equal to China. Therefore, it is not strange that the desire to fight with China prevails in the states.
    The opium wars and the Chinese addiction to drugs set China back decades, if not hundreds of years, in terms of the country's development.
    1. The eye of the crying
      The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 14: 46
      0
      Quote: ZEMCH
      the desire to fight with China prevails in the states.


      There is no desire in the United States to fight China.

      Quote: ZEMCH
      The opium wars and the Chinese addiction to drugs set China back decades, if not hundreds of years, in terms of the country's development.


      Yeah, for centuries. If not for the opium wars, China would already be building space cities.
      1. ZEMCH
        ZEMCH 4 October 2020 15: 08
        0
        Quote: Eye of the Crying
        Yeah, for centuries. If not for the opium wars, China would already be building space cities.

        On October 24-25, 1860, the Beijing treaties were signed, according to which the Qing Empire paid a large indemnity, opened Tianjin for foreign trade, and allowed the use of the Chinese as a virtual slave labor force in the colonies of Great Britain and France. From that moment on, the southern part of the Kowloon Peninsula passed to Great Britain, and Russia received the Ussuri region.
        From the richest country, China turned into a very poor country, most of the population was on hard drugs. The economy is destroyed. Trade preferences for Britain allowed the trade balance with China to be reversed.
        1. The eye of the crying
          The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 15: 20
          -1
          So what? Where is the "discard for decades", especially centuries? The opium wars and colonialism naturally slowed down China's development for several decades. But they didn't throw him anywhere.

          Quote: ZEMCH
          most of the population was on hard drugs


          Today is some day of children's horror stories.
          1. ZEMCH
            ZEMCH 4 October 2020 15: 38
            +1
            Explore the history of China, the constant flow of opium sold by the British to China led to a huge spread of drug addiction among the Chinese, degradation and mass extinction of the population.
            After the first Opium in China, civil war broke out. The Manchu Qing Dynasty fought the Taiping. We supported the North, the Taipings were supported by France, Britain, the United States.
            Britain was now trading opium (grown on its plantations in the colonies) for goods from China, when it used to pay in silver and gold. Cultural values ​​were plundered, most of the developed cities were destroyed, China practically lost 4 ports, they were controlled by Britain
            1. The eye of the crying
              The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 15: 43
              0
              Quote: ZEMCH
              Learn the history of China


              A simple and easy predictable answer - instead of facts, send your opponent to learn.

              Quote: ZEMCH
              After the first Opium in China, civil war broke out. The Manchu Qing Dynasty fought the Taiping


              "the Taiping often referred to the Qing in general and the Manchus in particular as some variant of demons or monsters (妖), representing Hong's proclamation that they were fighting a holy war". Is this also to blame for the opium wars?

              Quote: ZEMCH
              the constant flow of opium sold by the British to China led to a gigantic spread of drug addiction among the Chinese, degradation and mass extinction of the population.


              Could you give the figures on the spread of drug addiction? Because even 20% is a "gigantic distribution", but above you spoke about "the majority of the population."

              Quote: ZEMCH
              Cultural property looted, most developed cities destroyed


              That's the big part? Which ones?
              1. ZEMCH
                ZEMCH 4 October 2020 16: 53
                0
                Before the opiumization of China, 200 boxes of opium were supplied to it (1 box is 60 pounds of raw opium) for medical purposes, by the second war 52925 boxes, more than 50% of the administrative apparatus were drug addicts. Subjects of the Qing Empire, no longer able to exist without a daily dose, themselves began to cultivate opium poppy - instead of tea and rice, which by the end of the century had to be imported. And this is in the country that brought Britain to the depreciation of the Pound Sterling, due to the lack of silver)))
                By 1945, more than a million hectares were occupied by poppy sowing in China, and the official number of drug addicts alone was 20 million.
                About the century of devastation of the beginning of opiumization - early 19th century
                Drug addiction could only be defeated by Mao in the middle of the 20th century. Those. more than a century.
                About values
                Having defeated the elite imperial cavalry on September 21, 1860, the allies entered Beijing, where they burned the imperial summer palace - Yuan-min-yuan, along with countless treasures of the ancient culture. It was the largest masterpiece the Chinese have created in their centuries-old history.
                What was taken out during the robbery has been preserved for mankind in museums and private collections in Europe.
                The Chinese consider these actions of European countries to be genocide, and believe me they will never forget)))
                The history of the Opium Wars, causes and consequences are read as a separate course in Chinese universities, and not only in Chinese
                1. The eye of the crying
                  The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 17: 03
                  0
                  Quote: ZEMCH
                  By 1945, more than a million hectares were occupied by poppy sowing in China, and the official number of drug addicts alone was 20 million.


                  Well, finally the numbers. I did not find the population for 1945, but for 1953 it is ~ 582 million. Let's say in 1945 it was 500 million, then 20 million gives us 4% of drug addicts officially. Let in reality there were 2 times more of them - this is 8%. So where and when did you find that "the majority were on hard drugs"?

                  Quote: ZEMCH
                  Having defeated the elite imperial cavalry on September 21, 1860, the allies entered Beijing, where they burned the imperial summer palace - Yuan-min-yuan, along with countless treasures of the ancient culture.


                  This is barbarism. But you talked about the destruction of most of the developed cities. May I have a list?

                  Quote: ZEMCH
                  The Chinese consider these actions of European countries to be genocide, and believe me they will never forget)))


                  Will they forget the massacres during the Taiping uprising or not?
  • Andrei from Chelyabinsk
    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 4 October 2020 14: 30
    0
    Any European willfulness is nipped in the bud by the roar of American tank tracks on the autobahns of Europe.

    Eeee .. what ?? !! :)))) Alexander, who exactly did the US tank tracks rumble in Europe? :)))) Have you gone completely into unscientific fantasy? Please come back :))))
    But then answer the author a couple of questions

    Yes please
    Are there today among NATO members and any "graduate students" those who, with appropriate financial and military injections, are capable of starting a war against Russia?

    No. Even the Turks were not so maddened. Even the Poles, with all their anti-Russian rhetoric, by and large hope to benefit from their declared position of "bright Gondor on the path of Morodorsk ... oh, sorry, Russian orc ... eghkm ... armed forces", and are not looking for a military confrontation. Some part of their population is seriously afraid of our aggression, but they will not climb first for anything.
    Are there forces in NATO capable of waging a conventional war with the Russians?

    Without the USA? No.
    Today the situation is such that without US intervention, NATO forces will have at least some chance of success only if the forces of many countries consolidate. And there will be no such consolidation, because Europe does not need a war with the Russian Federation at all
    Those who remember the times of the USSR, who began military service in the Soviet Army, remember that the Americans never hid who their enemy was.

    As we are.
    In fact, there is little Soviet left in the N-6. The Chinese changed the glider, installed Russian engines, installed modern electronics,

    And such nonsense turned out :)))))))))))))
    Tell the residents of Nagorno-Karabakh that there are no fools in the world today who are capable of starting a war, including a world war.

    Let's tell you why not? In the world there are and have been willing to start a "small victorious war", so that with little blood, on foreign territory, quickly, economically and politically. This is exactly how Azerbaijan's attack was conceived. But in what you are writing about, Alexander, no one has a desire to get involved
    1. The eye of the crying
      The eye of the crying 4 October 2020 14: 43
      0
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      And such nonsense turned out :)))))))))))))


      Why do you think so?
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 5 October 2020 07: 21
        +1
        Quote: Eye of the Crying
        Why do you think so?

        Because even the most sophisticated N-6K is just a modernized Tu-16. Which was magnificent for its time, but that time passed a little 40 years ago. Just compare the N-6K and the Tu-22M3, taking into account that the latter, in general, is no longer at the forefront of progress either (but still excellent)
        If you look at purely anti-ship capabilities, then the problem is that the H-6 has a subsonic speed and the relatively short-range YJ-62, flying as much as 400 km and even subsonic. Well, how do you order all this to fight?
        There will be no external control center - the Americans will never allow the Chinese AWACS to control the movement of the AUG. It is pointless to shoot "somewhere in that direction" - missiles will fly 400 km for almost half an hour, in order to have a chance to hit the target, you need to know exactly the position of the enemy at the moment of the volley. In general, everything goes to the fact that the N-6 will have to break through to the detection range of the AUG with its own radars. At a speed of just over 1000 km / h ... Suicide bombers. We planned a supersonic attack on the Tu-22M3 to reduce the reaction time, and the strike was planned to be delivered with supersonic missiles, and then the losses were assumed to be very large. And this ...
        1. The eye of the crying
          The eye of the crying 5 October 2020 09: 58
          0
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          Because even the most sophisticated N-6K is just a modernized Tu-16.


          That is, not "such garbage turned out", but "it's still outdated." And the opinion about obsolescence is based on ... probably only on speed?

          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          The H-6 has a subsonic speed and the relatively short-range YJ-62, flying as much as 400 km, and even subsonic. Well, how do you order all this to fight?


          400 km is outside the air defense AUG. Coastal aircraft or their own aircraft will probably protect against aircraft.

          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          Americans will never allow the Chinese AWACS to control the AUG movement


          Only one thing can be said for sure - the Americans will try not to allow it.
          1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
            Andrei from Chelyabinsk 5 October 2020 10: 47
            +3
            Quote: Eye of the Crying
            That is, not "such garbage turned out", but "it's still outdated"

            If, as a result of the modernization of the Chinese Air Force, they receive an aircraft tactically obsolete back in 1983, then it turned out exactly garbage.
            Quote: Eye of the Crying
            And the opinion about obsolescence is based on ... probably only on speed?

            Speed ​​+ range + wearable ammunition. It makes no sense to talk about minced meat, because its performance characteristics are unknown, but the installation of engines from civil aviation is pretty amusing. The latter is clearly optimized for cruising speed ...
            Quote: Eye of the Crying
            400 km is outside the air defense AUG.

            Air Defense AUG - this is a patrol from Hokai + Prowler + fighters 300 km from AUG in the direction of a potential threat. If the threat is significant, it is duplicated by the second same group, but already 600 km from the AUG in the direction of the threat. Our Tu-16s were also detected by the Americans at 900 km from the AUG (but everything happened there, it happened visually :))).
            But we have vast experience in tracking / detecting AUG, and powerful reconnaissance means at that time, and the Chinese ...
            Quote: Eye of the Crying
            It is likely that coastal aircraft or their own aircraft will protect against aircraft.

            Remind me, what Chinese fighters are capable of operating at 3000 km, declared by the N-6K? :)))
            Quote: Eye of the Crying
            Only one thing can be said for sure - the Americans will try not to allow it.

            We can confidently say that they won't. Chinese AWACS will have to illuminate the radar to look for the AUG. And for the American reconnaissance group, the radar is not a means of reconnaissance, but a means of additional reconnaissance of targets. Then the Chinese will find it difficult not only to identify the AUG, it will be difficult for them to ensure the combat stability of their own reconnaissance means
            1. The eye of the crying
              The eye of the crying 5 October 2020 11: 10
              0
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              Air Defense AUG - this is a patrol from Hokai + Prowler + fighters 300 km from AUG in the direction of a potential threat.


              Hawkeye and Prowler are not air defenses. I have already said about the defense of bombers.

              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              Our Tu-16 the Americans identified and 900 km from the AUG


              Is there anything to hit them at such a distance? I thought so.

              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              Remind me, what Chinese fighters are capable of operating at 3000 km, declared by the N-6K? :)))


              The H-6K is not required to operate at this exact distance. Otherwise, China is building aircraft carriers.
              1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                Andrei from Chelyabinsk 5 October 2020 11: 49
                +1
                Quote: Eye of the Crying
                Hawkeye and Prowler are not air defense.

                This is air defense, whether you like it or not. It is the air wing that is the basis of the AUG air defense, and it has always been so.
                Quote: Eye of the Crying
                I have already said about the defense of bombers.

                And I answered you. But if you don't understand, I can again. In order to generally lift the H-6 into the air, it is necessary to reconnoiter the position of the AUG, and in order for them to be able to shoot from extreme distances, the AUG must be escorted. This requires an AWACS with cover, which the Chinese will not do at any noticeable distance from the coast. Yes, TAVKR will help - but they will be searched for and destroyed in the first place, while the AUG is still outside the radius of coastal aviation
                Quote: Eye of the Crying
                Is there anything to hit them at such a distance?

                F / A-18E / F
                Quote: Eye of the Crying
                The H-6K is not required to operate at this exact distance.

                I don't have to, of course. And he can't.
                Quote: Eye of the Crying
                For the rest, China is building aircraft carriers.

                not having their own AWACS yet.
                1. The eye of the crying
                  The eye of the crying 5 October 2020 12: 13
                  0
                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  This is air defense, whether you like it or not.


                  No matter how many times you repeat this, Hawkeye and Growler will not become AA defenses. They are not capable of knocking anything down.

                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  TAVKR will help - but they will be searched for and destroyed in the first place


                  This magic phrase can be said about AUG. The question is who will be able to "find and destroy". And even more depends on the actual tasks being performed - covering the coast, protecting shipping or the AUG duel.

                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  Our Tu-16 the Americans identified and 900 km from the AUG
                  Quote: Eye of the Crying
                  Is there anything to hit them at such a distance?

                  F / A-18E / F



                  Their combat radius is smaller.

                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  not having their own AWACS yet.


                  The plane is already there.
                  1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 5 October 2020 12: 23
                    +1
                    Quote: Eye of the Crying
                    No matter how many times you repeat this, Hawkeye and Growler will not become AA defenses. They are not capable of knocking anything down.

                    You'd better look at the composition of the air defense forces, for example, of the Russian Federation. There are tons of radar stations out there, which is a surprise! - they also do not shoot down anything, but the air defense includes "Sky-SV", "Sky-SVU", "Casta-2-2", etc. etc. Likewise, Hawkeye and Growler are part of the AUG air defense system.
                    Quote: Eye of the Crying
                    This magic phrase can be said about AUG. The question is who will be able to "find and destroy"

                    Can. The only difference is that AUG's search capabilities are much higher than that of TAVKR + ground-based AWACS aviation
                    Quote: Eye of the Crying
                    Their combat radius is smaller.

                    Less than what? :)))) Just in case - the combat radius exceeds 1000 km. No, I understand what is written in the 750 wiki, but this is in an impact version with a good load.
                    Quote: Eye of the Crying
                    The plane is already there.

                    Yeah. Which can possibly take off from an aircraft carrier. True, there is no aircraft carrier that could receive it.
                    1. The eye of the crying
                      The eye of the crying 5 October 2020 13: 42
                      0
                      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                      also Hawkeye and Growler are part of the AUG air defense.


                      Yes. But part of the air defense is not air defense.

                      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                      No, I understand what is written in the 750 wiki, but this is in an impact version with a good load.


                      If you follow the links from the same Wikipedia, you can find out that combat radius is 410nm with two Sidewinders and two AMRAAMs.

                      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                      The plane is already there.

                      Yeah. Which can possibly take off from an aircraft carrier. True, there is no aircraft carrier that could receive it.


                      If we are talking about the present moment, then, in general, there are no aircraft carriers. But this only means that now the H-6 cannot be used against the AUG for their entire range. But I suppose there will be other goals for them.
                      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 5 October 2020 14: 33
                        +1
                        Quote: Eye of the Crying
                        Yes. But part of the air defense is not air defense.

                        Talk about nothing, sorry. I wrote
                        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                        Air Defense AUG is a patrol from Hawkeye + Prowler+ fighters

                        They can shoot down enemy aircraft and are also part of the air defense system.
                        Quote: Eye of the Crying
                        If you follow the links from the same Wikipedia, you can find out that combat radius is 410nm with two Sidewinders and two AMRAAMs.

                        And by going ... yes, at least here https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-18.htm we learn that we are talking about "fighter escort", that is, in 410 natural miles (760 km) the aircraft can also patrol for some time. And this is without taking into account the outboard tanks ...
                        Quote: Eye of the Crying
                        But this only means that now the H-6 cannot be used against the AUG for their entire range.

                        That is not the question. It is possible to use IL-2 against AUG, the question is in the effectiveness of such a solution.
                        The high speed of the missile carrier allows him to quickly reach the line of attack, minimizing the time from receiving the command control to the attack. N-6 cannot do that. A subsonic bomber, such as the Tu-95 or any other, can "hang" in the air for a long time, waiting for a signal to attack, and thus minimizes the time from receiving a control command to reaching the line. N-6 cannot do that. That is, the N-6 does not have the advantages of solving the AUG attack problem that strategic or naval missile-carrying aviation has, but retains its disadvantages.
                        Hence my conclusion about bullshit
  • HaByxoDaBHocep
    HaByxoDaBHocep 4 October 2020 17: 45
    +2
    The War for Paracels is already shown in Battelfield 4)
  • Imperial Technocrat
    Imperial Technocrat 4 October 2020 18: 18
    -3
    There will be no world war, because the hypothetical war of the TrumpFeller grids (USA, India, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Israel, Egypt, etc.) against the network of Cooperativists' assets (China, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, etc.) will be sublimated into a civil war in USA, after the November elections. Straight along the Rothschild Blank-Ulyanou - translation of the imperialist war into a civil one https://t.me/dvaplustwo
  • businessv
    businessv 4 October 2020 21: 50
    0
    And then an American appears on a white horse. And from the side that wins. And it helps to "finish off the reptile."
    Everything as it was during the Second World War! Nothing has changed and will not change as long as this state exists. Thanks for the article, Alexander! good
  • Michael HORNET
    Michael HORNET 4 October 2020 22: 42
    +4
    Kindergarten level analytics
  • depressant
    depressant 4 October 2020 23: 01
    0
    Yes, the expectation of war seems to be hanging in the air, gradually degenerating into psychosis ...
    Last week had a cute weekend theme. Like, let's tell you what's good, please each other with weekly achievements, and people shared - so much warmth! So much sympathy for those who have sorrow.
    And there are many stories that mushrooms are an unprecedented harvest, photographs. I didn't spoil people's mood. An unprecedented harvest of mushrooms, according to the press and bloggers, is celebrated everywhere, throughout Russia, regardless of the weather in a particular area, and knowledgeable people conducting their observations of the behavior of mushrooms - both scientists and gatherers, gloomily noted that such unprecedented mushroom harvests were observed only before the Second World War and the Chechen wars. And from the latest news reports: in the Moscow region, mushrooms growing on trees release excess moisture in the form of bloody tears. Previously, they also isolated, but pure drops of water, but here it is like blood, and photographs, looking at which, shudder ... Of course, you can say: a natural phenomenon. Yes it is. The sun has just given a monstrous ejection, which has not happened for many years, and the same is expected on October 22-23. And, as you know, such emissions act not only on equipment, but also on people, prompting them to generate and then release human aggression ...

    I watched the video in which the journalist Slavina was on fire, and I thought: after all, some bastard shot that video under a contract with the victim. Not from the camera - the image flickered several times. Sorry for the guy who tried to put out. She sat quietly, and the fire was already creeping over her - this is hellish pain! And then she pushed the guy away, and in order to disperse the flame harder, she waved her hands. She sat down again, and burned - sitting, until she lost consciousness and, burnt to blackness, to soot, fell on the sidewalk stones. This is how the sun hit, apparently in combination with a drug. And without it, the drug, how can you handle this? It struck the entire planet, whipping up the desire for death and calling for it as a solution to all the accumulated problems ...

    And the problem is in the political aspect - it has long been known. Globalization needed by transnationals to take control of the globe. The first approach was based on erasing ideological boundaries, bringing the Earth to a single capitalist denominator. Did not work out. Because the erasure of borders has unexpectedly led to the maturation of an economic monster - China. The second approach of globalization will be based on the reverse process - not just on the return of former borders, but on the establishment of many new ones by fragmentation of large territories. Here, one cannot do without a world war in the form of a combination of a large number of local wars. And they will, the puppeteers are damned. There is only a faint hope: can we do without nuclear weapons? Somehow I don't want to watch the growth of nuclear mushrooms. Let the forest be better.
  • Undecim
    Undecim 4 October 2020 23: 49
    +2
    Previously, there was a certain Kamenev on the site, none of whose predictions came true. Now he was replaced by Staver with the same reflections far from reality.
    The author - analytics - is not yours. Panagiriki is your signature genre.
  • TriA
    TriA 5 October 2020 01: 13
    +5
    If you look back, it will become clear that these events are clearly leading to a deterioration in relations between the CSTO and NATO, between European countries, between countries located in the immediate vicinity of Europe.

    Ha, East and West have always been at enmity. There is nothing new. So it was in the time of Alexander the Great, so it was in the time of Byzantium, and so it is now.
  • WeAreNumerOne
    WeAreNumerOne 5 October 2020 09: 19
    -1
    The queues are at the military registration and enlistment offices in Baku and Yerevan - because Armenians and Azerbaijanis are a nation. They do not lose the cultural connection with each other, they stick to the diaspora, I think in many cities of the Russian Federation you have seen this - hook one, at once 20 people will fly at you. It was also in Ukraine, albeit not on such a scale, and this is normal. The nation must be protected, otherwise they constantly mold us into a Soviet person or a multinational Russian. This will only lead to the appearance of cattle without clan and tribe. Shame
  • Maximilian37
    Maximilian37 5 October 2020 10: 50
    +1
    The author, tell me, what does the term "war in Europe" mean? Who do you mean? England and France? Or maybe Germany with Luxembourg? Etc. Etc. Maybe it's enough to write heresy?
  • Maximilian37
    Maximilian37 5 October 2020 10: 53
    0
    Quote: Undecim
    Previously, there was a certain Kamenev on the site, none of whose predictions came true. Now he was replaced by Staver with the same reflections far from reality.
    The author - analytics - is not yours. Panagiriki is your signature genre.


    He has already received his fee, then your and our screams are not interesting to him
  • Selevc
    Selevc 5 October 2020 15: 36
    +1
    The article is sheer nonsense - especially that part of it that is devoted to the likely military conflict between the United States and China !!! Unlike the author of the article, both the American and Chinese command understands one but indisputable fact - in a probable war between China and the United States (some unlikely non-nuclear or almost non-nuclear scenario), neither China will be able to defeat the United States - nor the United States will be able to defeat China. Because the US is too weak on the continent in East Asia and China is too weak in the Pacific !!!

    But this does not mean that both sides do not seek to destroy each other's world order. Only this is most likely the United States will try to do with the help of externally controlled riot-chaos technologies, while China will economically stifle the United States - capturing new markets around the world and ousting the United States from there !!!
  • Selevc
    Selevc 5 October 2020 15: 59
    +1
    And then an American appears on a white horse. And from the side that wins. And it helps to "finish off the reptile." At the same time, getting all the victory trophies in full.
    You will not believe !!! - the author of the article (apparently without knowing it) described the strategy of the Anglo-American policy in Europe which these countries are pursuing - England for 300 years is for sure, the USA - for the last 100 years !!!
    Here are examples (only the fattest):
    1) 7-year war Russian bayonets defeated Frederick's Prussia - an ally of France and an enemy of Britain of that era !!!
    2) 7 coalitions against Napoleon - victories were paid for with English gold and won with Russian and Austrian blood !!! Russia was at war with France - a country that has no territorial claims to Russia for the interests of other countries !!! Britain appears in the final act of this drama on the white horse Winner at Waterloo !!!
    3) 1st World War - Britain and the United States are trying to destroy Kaiser's Germany - on the continent, mainly with Russian blood. It does not work and then they bring down Germany with a blow below the belt - revolution. Russia is defeated in the same way - just in case ... Winners appear in all parts of Russia on white horses - in the form of invaders !!!
    4) 2nd World War - an attempt to revenge Germany for the defeat in the 1st World War. Britain and the United States - they send Hitler to the east, then they sell weapons to Stalin for gold and platinum, profiting from this, then the USSR, at the cost of millions of lives, liberates Europe from fascism !!! The winners organize the 2nd front when a clear winner appears on the continent and appear on the White Horses at the Potsdam Conference !!!

    So - maybe it's time for Russia somehow to end this all ??? Or the powers of the sea will definitely always decide the destinies of the countries of the European continent and Russia is powerless to do anything about it ???
  • 9 Shaft
    9 Shaft 5 October 2020 17: 54
    -1
    After the Second World War, there were many local conflicts (wars), but in each such conflict, coalitions of dozens of countries participated, two openly, and the rest help in some way. There really was no "good" mess for a long time, because everyone understands how it can end, but nevertheless the acuteness in the world and tension are maintained, and probably for a reason. So far steam is being released regionally, but something can go wrong ...
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Zementbomber
    Zementbomber 7 October 2020 00: 40
    -1
    USA prepares for Second world war

    It's five!! For such a subtitle, one must immediately kill Medny Kandelyabrom Tsitovich and the Author, and Literary, and the Proofreader ... hi
    И these people - tried to teach me (over 30 years late) that the phrase "World War II" - "World War" should be written with a small bukFF ... bully