The Pentagon announced the loss of the "inaccessibility" of the United States due to Russian submarines

The modernization of Russian submarine forces has resulted in the United States losing its "inaccessibility." This was stated by the commander of the submarine forces of the US Navy, Vice Admiral Daryl Caudle, writes Business Insider.

According to the commander, despite the fact that the Russian fleet there are fewer submarines than the Soviet Union had; Russia has modern, quieter, more autonomous nuclear submarines capable of striking ground targets.

Our country is no longer out of reach, so we must be prepared to conduct high-level operations in local waters

- declared admiral.

Michael Petersen, director of the Russian Naval Research Institute at the US Naval War College, said the United States needs to prepare for submarine war as soon as possible, since Russia has already demonstrated its Caliber cruise missiles, striking targets on land from submarines.

Earlier, Vice Admiral Andrew Woody Lewis said that the United States had lost its undisputed dominance in the Atlantic due to Russian submarines.

Moscow uses technology with more lethal weapons systems, which makes it increasingly difficult to prepare the American fleet for various operations. (...) outside of the main naval base of the Atlantic Fleet, the US Navy feels insecure

- quotes his words edition.

Comments

[Bykov.]

Earlier, Vice Admiral Andrew Woody Lewis said that the United States had lost its undisputed dominance in the Atlantic due to Russian submarines.

Nice to hear that.

[St Petrov]

outside the main naval base of the Atlantic Fleet, the US Navy, the military feel insecure

but I liked this moment. Nothing, stress is good.

[SRC P-15]

Earlier, Vice Admiral Andrew Woody Lewis said that the United States had lost its undisputed dominance in the Atlantic due to Russian submarines.

Deep down to Washington
"Poseidon" sneaks quietly!

[Vladimir_6]

Quote: СРЦ П-15

Deep down to Washington

Greetings, Alexander.
By the way about Washington. In 1812, when Napoleon was destroying Moscow, the British destroyed Washington to its core.

[George 2]

While the sides are supported by the "Uncle Sam" with the trident of Neptune,
Russia will easily solve international problems.

[KVU-NSVD]

Quote: Bulls.

Earlier, Vice Admiral Andrew Woody Lewis said that the United States had lost its undisputed dominance in the Atlantic due to Russian submarines.

Nice to hear that.

You just need money. If he starts broadcasting that the forces subordinate to him can defend themselves against any danger, then they may not throw a share in the military budget (or even cut it down altogether). Therefore, the military always "observe an increasing danger" and no matter what.

[codetalker]

For "money" they don't need to make any claims. To do this, they have people in Congress who receive bribes from the military-industrial complex.

[Starover_Z]

The United States needs to prepare for submarine war as soon as possible, as Russia has already demonstrated its Caliber cruise missiles, launching submarine strikes against targets on land.

And they still have festive confetti on their submarines with Trident missiles in warheads!
The Americans seem to be fighting only I have a tenfold or more advantage, heroes!

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Starover_Z

The Americans seem to be fighting only I have ten or more times the advantage, heroes!

I looked at the statistics of the balance of forces on US operations in World War II. It was far from always that a tenfold advantage was obtained, but this was exactly what they strove for.

And the funniest thing happened with the "liberation of the Japanese-occupied" island of Kiska (Operation Cottage). 7800 gallant American guys against 0 Japanese. They also managed to suffer "combat" losses - 103 killed, 230 wounded and a destroyer. 424 tons of bombs, 330 tons of shells and as a result "captured" a dozen dogs thrown by the Japanese. And until the end of the war, "just in case" they kept a garrison of 108 thousand there. A great victory!

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Zoldat_A

I looked at the statistics of the balance of forces on US operations in World War II. It was far from always that a tenfold advantage was obtained, but this was exactly what they strove for.

And they did the right thing. There is no need to turn war into battles of the trueborn. You can ensure superiority - do it.

Quote: Zoldat_A

And the funniest thing happened with the "liberation of the Japanese-occupied" island of Kiska (Operation Cottage). 7800 gallant American guys against 0 Japanese.

Better this way than "troops have landed, no connection", and then - "we have no information about the landing, the personnel are considered missing".
At the same time, the Yankees trained in conditions as close as possible to combat.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Alexey RA

At the same time, the Yankees trained in conditions as close as possible to combat.

The laughter is that they trained in advance on one of the neighboring islands. And here - a full-fledged operation. By the way, in Normandy, 156 thousand went to German pillboxes, and here, until the end of the war, 108 thousand "holiday-makers" rested on the territory two times less than, for example, Voronezh.

[Fizik M]

Quote: Zoldat_A

And the funniest thing happened with the "liberation of the Japanese-occupied" island of Kiska (Operation Cottage). 7800 gallant American guys versus 0 Japanese

better read about Midway

[Kart]

Quote: Starover_Z

And they still have festive confetti on their submarines with Trident missiles in warheads!

This is another! ©
Obviously, the same American missiles bring only democracy, peace and prosperity to the United States.
And ours, on the contrary, is death, devastation and humiliation of the United States.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Bulls.

Earlier, Vice Admiral Andrew Woody Lewis said that the United States had lost its undisputed dominance in the Atlantic due to Russian submarines.

Nice to hear that.

And again, the American generals praise Russia will boil down to "Give money for new submarines."

[Doccor18]

If your mortal enemy praises you, then either everything is bad with you, or vigilance puts you to sleep ...

[Fizik M]

Quote: Doccor18

If your mortal enemy praises you, then either everything is bad with you, or vigilance puts you to sleep ...

Exactly!

[Fizik M]

Quote: Bulls.

Nice to hear that.

he stupidly LIES to you
more precisely "hangs noodles" GDP

[novel66]

and the Strategic Missile Forces are not a decree to them, chtoli?

[St Petrov]

they are in the sea, they are.
other branches of the armed forces feel insecure from the Strategic Missile Forces

[novel66]

so, it will fly over the ground, where to moor later?

[Voyager]

Quote: novel xnumx

where to moor later?

What for? Remembering the classics

[Galleon]

They sit at the reactor, are not limited by anything. Got a stroke and 3 weeks later in New Zealand.

[Cowbra]

Which was washed away 4 weeks ago)

[Kart]

Neville Shute "On the Last Shore"
https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=177215&p=1
The book is just for those who like to fight with Russia with nuclear weapons.

[beeper]

Quote: Carte

Neville Shute "On the Last Shore"
https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=177215&p=1
The book is just for those who like to fight with Russia with nuclear weapons.

Thanks, aka Kart , for the book, so nothing, curious, good translation, easy to read!

[orionvitt]

No one will bomb Africa. In this, the blacks are smarter, they do not climb into big politics. There will be a second colonization.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: novel xnumx

and the Strategic Missile Forces are not a decree to them, chtoli?

-Not sniff yet
Hi

[novel66]

there are better things not to try! hi!

[Lipchanin]

They even need

[nnm]

Another general will ask for money for the Strategic Missile Forces. Something like "after commissioning" Sarmat "and" Vanguard "the United States will lose their inaccessibility ..."

[Bez 310]

Do not flatter yourself!
The meaning of such statements has long been known -
obtaining additional funding.

[2 Level Advisor]

that's for sure .. they are for the loot, at least they will tell about the upcoming invasion of the Martians .. that would not be Russia, what would they scare everyone .. no .. they really need us ...

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Bez 310

Do not flatter yourself!
The meaning of such statements has long been known -
obtaining additional funding.

Aha ... before that, the leadership of the freshly restored Second Fleet talked about the superiority of the Russians and the inadequacy of the forces available to the fleet. It all ended with traditional requests strengthen and deepen it is the Second Fleet, as standing at the forefront of the defense of democracy.

[Fizik M]

Quote: Bez 310

The meaning of such statements has long been known -
obtaining additional funding.

Not only
there are also frank information actions regarding our VLOOKUP
see, for example, their company about the "super-navy of Chirkov", when under Chirkov "the chair swayed" - its purpose was clearly VVP (to give him noodles)

[rocket757]

The Pentagon announced the loss of the "inaccessibility" of the United States due to Russian submarines

Come on ... besides boats, there are convincing arguments! Just tell me, your admiral wants the fleet to be inflated \ build to incredible values ​​!!! and all the same, from retribution, if anything, IT WILL NOT SAVE !!!

[cniza]

So it is, but our boats give them big problems with finding and tracking ...
Greetings!

[rocket757]

Hi
The ocean is large, but the search engines, the opportunities, the minke whales have serious ... and we do not have many boats, especially, there is nothing to cover, there is nothing to protect them. With the ocean-going fleet, we now have NO AH !.
All the same, in total, our vigorous potential covers all possible tasks! And how many times the enemy's territory will be plowed is not essential, and once is enough.

[cniza]

So they used to pick their noses, but now they have to work. There are few boats - yes, but this is fixable ...

[rocket757]

Quote: cniza

There are few boats - yes, but this is fixable ...

Everything is fixable, when someone eats who decides to fix everything, there is someone who can fix everything.

[cniza]

And this, no matter how pompous it sounds, depends on us too, I think it's fixable ...

[rocket757]

There are different opinions ... I am an optimist - a pessimist! depending on your mood.

[cniza]

Whatever it was, but in difficult times everyone had to get together and decide what was not decided ...

[rocket757]

Now there is no real EVERYTHING, there are them and we ...
I don't know what needs to happen for the situation to change.

[cniza]

The trouble must happen big, but better not ...

[rocket757]

What's the big trouble? You can not talk about a "hot" war, you can not ... a universal pestilence or a flood? Moreover, the invasion of aliens can be presented as a global factor.
For more / less I have NO.

[cniza]

Not necessarily the war has enough natural disasters and others, but again, better not. We will have to solve these problems, otherwise they will strangle us, they surround us more and more closely ...

[rocket757]

So I don’t do it myself ... and others don’t want that either.
We are all human, human and not immortals, besides!

[cniza]

Here, here, and I still have many plans to be brought to their logical conclusion ...

[Fizik M]

Quote: cniza

So it is, but our boats give them big problems with finding and tracking ...

there are no big problems

[George 2]

So it is, but our boats give them big problems with finding and tracking ...

there are no big problems

"Foundations, Sir Andrew, you must state your grounds ..."

[Cowbra]

Yes, and lost exclusivity - without the Russian vaccine, your presidents there grab the crown)))
In fact, even the trained Bin Laden was quite up to it.

[Igor Polovodov]

Their blah blah blah just to justify the increase in the military budget ... listening to the enemy praising you ... such ...

[Silinvv]

Another horror story from the generals, in order to lay even more funds on the budget committee to finance the fleet in 2021 and then cut this money. Especially considering that the American military does not report on the targeted spending of budget funds - they drank as much as you wanted.

[Prisoner]

Here is a talker bird! "Lost undeniable domination", read uncontested lost, but domination is in place. Jesuit, you understand!

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

In fact, the vice admiral says everything correctly. We are now starting the entry of the Ash into service, they, with all their small numbers, require attention, so strengthening the ASW for the United States is a very timely measure.

[Fizik M]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

We are now starting the entry of the Ash into service, they, with all their small number, require attention,

any SP needs attention
even DPRK diesel-electric submarines
just a submarine enemy with whom you cannot "silk with your beak"

however, the Ash trees themselves do not pose any particular problems for the United States.

[rotmistr60]

Our country is no longer out of reach, so we should ...

Therefore, you should not open your mouth to someone else's, not meddle with your "democracy" and not teach how to live. You are not touched and you try not to interfere in the affairs of Russia, much less try to adjust it for yourself. And the most zealous would be nice to remember the historical events associated with the campaigns against Russia (USSR) by those who wanted the same as the United States today.

[cniza]

But they will never understand this, until they get it ...

[Paphnutius the Unforgettable]

Well, wow! America discovered!

[cniza]

outside the main naval base of the Atlantic Fleet, the US Navy, the military feel insecure

Well, here you sit at your bases ...

[Vladimir_6]

Michael Petersen said the United States needs to prepare for submarine war as soon as possible

But there were completely different pages of relations between the United States and Russia. Only it is unlikely that they remember it in America.
In 1775, George III asked Catherine to send 20 thousand Russian soldiers to suppress the revolt in America.
Catherine refused England's request.

“As agreed in the letter requested, my light,” the Empress informed Potemkin on September 6, “I have now answered the envoy with a complete refusal, having sternly explained that a Russian soldier will never serve under foreign banners. And then to say, my friend, that you are right - why would we help those who are our friends today, but enemies in all our life? "

Later, in 1863, a Russian squadron under the command of Rear Admiral Andrei Popov arrived at the port of San Francisco to protect the United States from Britain, in the amount of six ships and 1200 officers and sailors.
A squadron of Rear Admiral Stepan Lesovsky arrived in New York. Six ships and three thousand personnel.

In the American Civil War, Russia sided with the government in Washington, and such a frank gesture of support confused many of the British cards. They found themselves in the face of a possible military alliance between the US and Russia, which cooled their fervor a little. Lincoln, in turn, was grateful for international support. So the two countries, solving their own problems, united against a common enemy - England, and as a result, both Russia and the United States only benefited from this fleet expedition.

It may be better to unite once again to finish off the common enemy - Britain.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Vladimir_6

It may be better to unite once again to finish off the common enemy - Britain.

Vladimir, England has long been no longer an enemy of the United States, but is one of its most loyal satellites and allies. Your analogy, excuse me, is lame on all 4 legs.
In the past you described, the United States fought for its independence, and even in 1863 they were even weaker than England, but they had yet to become the leader of the industrial world. Then what happened happened - England weakened, the United States strengthened and, as a result of WWII, England gave the crown to the ruler of the seas of the United States, and she herself went to secondary roles.
In other words, the United States won bloodlessly in the fight against England. Without war, the United States became stronger than England economically, and this happened back in the 19th century, after which the transition of the leading role to the United States was only a matter of time. The British were smart and did not resist the inevitable, preferring the "honorable surrender" to the doomed attempts to defend the primacy.
Accordingly, today there have not been any serious contradictions between the United States and England. But between the Russian Federation and the United States - there is, and these contradictions, in principle, cannot be resolved at the expense of the British.

[Vladimir_6]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

Vladimir, England has long been no longer an enemy of the United States, but is one of its most loyal satellites and allies. Your analogy, excuse me, is lame on all 4 legs.

Andrey, on all fours, excuse me, your knowledge of relations between the United States and England is lame.
Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama - promoted to the presidency of the United States by London bankers, the owners of the Fed, and served their interests. When John F. Kennedy encroached on the freedom and independence of the FRS (the issue of real AMERICAN money in denominations of 2 and 5 dollars), he instantly departed to another world.
The owners of the printing press are in London, and who is the loyal satellite and ally to whom is still a question.

Accordingly, today there have not been any serious contradictions between the United States and England.

Recent events in the United States contradict your conclusions. The brutal press of Trump, who said that he is fighting the "deep state" is evidence of this.
The half-dead Biden is being promoted by a team that focuses on London.

But between the Russian Federation and the United States - there is, and these contradictions, in principle, cannot be resolved at the expense of the British.

If Trump succeeds in throwing off the yoke of the power of the "deep state" and winning the elections, then in his second term, completely different relations between Russia and the United States will be built.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Vladimir_6

Andrey, on all fours, excuse me, your knowledge of relations between the United States and England is lame.

Really? :)))

Quote: Vladimir_6

Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama - promoted to the presidency of the United States by London bankers, owners of the Fed, and served their interests.

I'm sorry, but it's not even conspiracy theories. This is even worse.
The Fed founded Hamilton - one of the heroes of the struggle for US independence. I will not tell her story, it is too long, I will just restrict myself to reminding that it was American bankers + representatives of the US government who ruled the Fed. The Federal Reserve Board of Governors is appointed by none other than the President of the United States, and the Senate approves the appointment. To say that some London bankers are telling him is about the same as claiming that he is being led by reptilians from Nibiru.
In fact, the British financial system was weaker than the American one even before WWII, and in WWII it simply collapsed. The United States was stronger in literally everything, including in capital, and dictated its vision of the world - including in the financial part. No "London bankers" had any financial or any other resources that could enable them to influence the United States. Any US president, even if he was brought to the elections by "London bankers" could easily throw them out and forget

Quote: Vladimir_6

When John F. Kennedy encroached on the freedom and independence of the FRS (the issue of real AMERICAN money in denominations of 2 and 5 dollars), he instantly departed to another world.

You are greatly mistaken. This conspiracy theory is built around the fact that Kenedy allowed his 11110 to issue the US Treasury silver certificates "real American dollars" :))) Alas, the creators of this theory do not know that the US Treasury issued them before Kennedy (from 1862) and issued them and after Kennedy (last time - in 1966) and the famous Executive Order No. 11110 just returned the US Treasury this right ... which Kennedy took away :))))))))))))

Quote: Vladimir_6

Recent events in the United States contradict your conclusions. The brutal press of Trump, who said that he is fighting the "deep state" is evidence of this.

there is no fierce struggle :)))))) Actually. it's not even a cruel chatter

[Vladimir_6]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

there is no fierce struggle :))))))

We'll see it in November.
In general, my first post is about a different level of relations between the United States and Russia, which were in the past.
The last phrase, "It might be better to unite once more to finish off the common enemy - Britain.", On which you focused your attention, is secondary.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Vladimir_6

In general, my first post is about a different level of relations between the United States and Russia, which were in the past.

Alas, the United States was not yet a superpower, and neither were we. But the intersection of interests with the British was with them and with us. There was a common field for joint action. Today ... he's gone

[Vladimir_6]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

Alas, the United States was not yet a superpower, and neither were we. But the intersection of interests with the British was with them and with us. There was a common field for joint action. Today ... he's gone

As far as the United States is concerned, my posts can be said to be wishful thinking. This is so, because there is a premonition of what this will be. For me, Britain is an enemy, and China is not a friend.
And how it will actually be, only God knows.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Well, in any case, it was nice to talk to!

[Vladimir_6]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

Well, in any case, it was nice to talk to!

Mutually Andrey! Your post on the Fed and Order 11110 has been helpful. I rummaged in the internet, read a lot of interesting additions.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Always happy to help. Often I myself learn a lot from such dialogues.

[zwlad]

Hmm. How can you lose something that never happened.

[Sailor]

I read and am amazed at what 8 nuclear submarines (including Boreyev for two fleets) can do against 50 nuclear submarines, not counting "friends".

[Dart]

"Institute for the Study of Russian Naval Forces at the US Naval College" - and we have similar institutions, ts. , alaverdi?

[petrol cutter]

"... outside the main naval base of the Atlantic Fleet of the US Navy, the military feels insecure"
Well Duc for this, our defense industry and is making every possible effort.
Otherwise, the meaning of our work? ...

[Fizik M]

this statement is nothing more than an element of information warfare (the report of the "US Navy Intelligence on the Russian Navy" a couple of years ago is from the same category). It is stupid to "hang noodles", incl. our VLOOKUP.
Sensitive to realities:

https://topwar.ru/157559-apkr-severodvinsk-proekt-885-jasen-sdan-vmf-s-kriticheskimi-dlja-ego-boesposobnosti-nedodelkami-protivotorpednoj-zaschity-podlodok-vmf-rf-net.html

https://topwar.ru/156811-arkticheskij-torpednyj-skandal.html