Round dance around the Dark Lord: no chance of proof
It is clear that not to death. Not even for Navalny's death, but they agreed.
Gigabytes of information, hours of TV broadcasts ...
For the most linear viewers, everything has long been clear and understandable. Those who are smarter have questions.
Here, for example, I have. And the most important question: who benefits and where is the logic?
Well, who benefits from is a separate topic altogether. It all depends on who you listen to. Since you are reading me now, I will start with myself, and you will first have to familiarize yourself with my opinion, based on a rather long examination of this terrarium through a telescope.
The opinion will be as follows: the Dark Lord lives under the "dead hand" rule. In his work on burdening the existence of our authorities and officials, he dug up something that, if attempted to be published, would lead him to rapid liquidation. But after. And at the present time, a very peculiar parity is obtained: Navalny does not publish these materials, and the authorities do not touch him.
Well, in fact, all these "last Chinese" warnings, all these arrests and detentions that do not lead to anything - everything prompts just such thoughts. Because excuse me, but we have already had many examples when for lesser actions people grabbed quite real terms for themselves. And they sat "from bell to bell."
But with Navalny, it's somehow unclean. Either they will be sent abroad for treatment, a passport will be issued, although not just issuing a passport - you cannot leave the country, because it is either under arrest or under investigation.
And in general, all these attempts to somehow infringe on FBK look like just a kindergarten. Well, really, if the authorities wanted, there would be no trace of the entire FBK, and the West would not help. They would shove them into the “sanatoriums”, and that would be the end of the FBK.
Say no?
Instead, we have some kind of indistinct fuss. The authorities really demonstrate their complete powerlessness in front of Navalny and their inability to somehow protect themselves from his attacks. But in general, Navalny is perhaps the only one in the country who somehow tries to stir up our imperious swamp, mired in corruption and idleness.
And now we have absolutely incomprehensible dances around, thank God, lively and warm Navalny.
Everybody is dancing: ours, European, American. They dance fervently and heartily. But - pretty stupid.
The Europeans accuse ours of the fact that it was Russian representatives of the special services who poisoned Navalny. "Newbie". Ours answer somehow like this, but not very confidently, in the style of "fools themselves."
In fact, the situation is outrageously simple: both sides are playing the same game. In my childhood it was called "The lady sent a hundred rubles." It's simple: "Yes and no, don't talk, don't buy black and white."
On the political platform of Europe with the participation of Russia, something like this is happening. The Germans very quickly take out Navalny. So quickly that you will inevitably think about it. It was as if the plane was standing under the steam, and was just waiting for the go-ahead. Our people are letting a plane from coronavirus Europe, with which our air traffic has been interrupted, but for Navalny's sake, please.
You can use the above conjectures as an argument.
Could you imagine what would start next? They were obliged. It was just painted with kwache on the wall - the accusation of all deadly sins. Nevertheless - they released, demonstrated something. I didn't understand what. Such a strange demonstration, from the field of sadomasochism.
But, nevertheless, ours for some reason substituted for the full program. Germany grabbed Navalny and raised a howl about the Novichok poisoning. Ignoring any attempts by Russia to intervene in the process, not even allowing the consul to meet with the "poisoned".
And here are two interesting facts:
- Germany did not provide a single document stating that Navalny was poisoned;
- Russia has not submitted a single document stating that Navalny was not poisoned.
Everything is classified, and therefore whoever wants to - he believes in the word, who does not want - does not believe. Interesting approach, right?
"Newbie" is a separate topic. Until now, there has not been a single proof that it exists. No, all over the world everyone believes in it with a light media feed and knows that the long arm of Russians can easily smear any door handle and any cat with this rubbish.
To be honest, I very much doubt that we have this “miracleweapons". No, some developments were carried out, it is possible that everything told by the dubious Mr. Uglev is true, but clearly this "Novichok" is more noise and PR. It is not clear why they are so furious in the West, if already in the 90s they received samples of the compound and studied them.
There is no evidence of the use of the A-234 or Novichok. Normal such evidence. The closed reports that the British sent out on the Skripals case do not count, no one really saw them. And nobody died there. Except for the cat.
Other cases of poisoning are also completely unsubstantiated. Either in the Finnish laboratory the samples will disappear (well, as if the Russian saboteurs took them out), then the analyzes failed, then some strange saboteur wanders around Britain and scatters bottles with A-234 around the cities.
It's a crazy situation, isn't it?
And about the same with Navalny. There is no data that there is a “Newbie”. And no one showed the results of the application and did not begin to prove anything.
British gentlemen have to take their word for it ...
A little more about "black".
Okay, in Germany they like Navalny, about like Gorbachev. Therefore, they take care of him and do not let anyone in. Even the consul of the country of which Navalny is a citizen.
But another question: why only Navalny? And the doctors? The pilots of the plane that took Navalny to Berlin? Accompanying persons?
Somehow selective and indicative at the same time. As they knew that only Navalny was poisoned with a high degree of probability and certainty, so they spat on everyone else.
When the banker Ivan Kivelidi was poisoned with something similar in 1995, having smeared the poison on a telephone receiver, his personal secretary died along with the banker. And a dozen people were hospitalized. And in our case, no one was hurt.
We have already begun to recall the remarkable in all respects poisoning of Yushchenko, which also acquired a bunch of "details" and absurdities.
But in the end we have what we have: sheer nonsense without a single proof.
- Russia has the now forbidden lethal compound Novichok. There is no evidence.
- the Russian special services use the connection to eliminate the unwanted. There is no evidence.
- The Novice is lethal and deadly. And here there is evidence, but they are of the opposite nature, for the only one who died through the fault of the "Novichok" is the Skripals cat, who for some reason was killed.
- Navalny was poisoned by Novichok. There is no evidence.
- Navalny was not poisoned by Novichok. There is no evidence.
- Navalny is not poisoned. Vague considerations, since he has more than enough sores.
What is this all for? Who benefits from?
It is definitely not beneficial for Russia. Navalny, poisoned with a cookie to death, would be beneficial to the authorities. Until they figure it out, until they scold for his place, until ... In general, there would be peace and quiet. You can safely saw, build palaces, squeeze out beautiful pieces of land, and so on.
But Navalny is alive, around whom the Germans, French, Swedes are dancing ... Who are looking for evidence of his poisoning by the Novichok - alas, we do not really need this.
Here, perhaps, it is worth remembering a test tube with crystals. Powder at a meeting of the UN Commission. After all, if the A-234 and all the others are chemical warfare agents, then Russia has not fulfilled its obligations in the OPCW to destroy chemical weapons.
Well, what is customary to do with those who suddenly find it (Iran, Iraq, Syria) has long been known. It is clear that we have little gut to arrange "Desert Storm", but there is no talk of a world Apocalypse either, so ...
This means sanctions. Regular. And there is a pole chance for those who constantly shout that Russia should be deprived of its right of "veto" in the UN.
That is, in fact, who benefits from it. Germany has long cherished the dream of a voice in the UN on a par with France. Alternatively, why not? Perhaps the calculation was based on this. It's not for nothing that the Germans are trying so hard.
But ours are also good. Instead of really presenting factual, they release the Kraken, that is, Kiselev. And in the world around this mouthpiece just for everyone serves as proof of the opposite.
As a result - silly dances with an unclear ending. But since nothing is done in the world just like that, we will see the result sooner or later.
Information