About 100 million Americans watched the debate with the words "clown" and "shut up" between Trump and Biden

141

In the United States, the first round of debates took place between the presidential candidates of the country - Donald Trump and Joseph Biden. The debate, as the experts predicted, turned out to be hot. In less than a few minutes, not even a few phrases were spoken, the candidates became personal.

In the heat of the debate, it got to the point that Biden tried to interrupt Trump with a word



Shut up!

Debate moderator Chris Wallace had to appeal to candidates for ethics and offer to "slow down".

According to Trump, he does not understand at all for what purpose Biden is going to the polls. The current US president said that during the Obama presidency "he and Biden have failed everything, including health care reform."

Biden:

It is not true. He is wishful thinking. He himself promised to reduce the prices of medicines, to show a plan for improving the medical system, but we never got any of this.

Joe Biden accused Trump of failing the campaign to fight the coronavirus, as more than 210 thousand people have died from the disease in the United States to date. In response, Trump said that Biden "is preparing to turn the United States into a ghetto, finally closing the country and limiting freedom."

During the debate, Trump accused his opponents of being "hindered from working for a significant part of his presidential term by starting a ridiculous impeachment procedure."

Trump:

At the same time, over the years I have done many times more than you and Obama have done in your terms.

In general, the debate focused on a variety of topics, including protests in US cities and protests by black Americans against police brutality. However, instead of constructive discussion, they looked more like an uncivilized show, in which opponents stoop to the point that they openly call each other names. It got to the point of using such a word as "clown".



The first round of debates in the United States was followed by about 100 million viewers.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    141 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +5
      30 September 2020 06: 40
      Lovely ones scold, only amuse themselves. You can't name it otherwise.
      1. +45
        30 September 2020 06: 49
        Wasn't Zhirik? It's a shame ... He would have given a master class.
        1. +9
          30 September 2020 07: 26
          This is how the war was unleashed in the Caucasus before this debate. The calculation is that the Americans are not up to it. Pashinyan ran, ran to the western clerks, so what? Okay, Baku people don't know how to fight, but what if the enemy was more literate? Already Karabakh would have fallen and Yerevan was under siege. An example with Georgia. If our troops themselves had not stopped a few tens of kilometers from Tiflis? And after all, the Russian Federation did not use all its might, the number of troops and equipment was in favor of the Georgians. I hope the Soros will leave Armenia or there will be no Armenia. Biden on psychostimulants ... did not fall asleep wassat Hilary was on this stuff too, so she was overwhelmed. Ecstasy fights Trump once again wassat
          1. +6
            30 September 2020 09: 50
            Quote: hrych
            Biden on psychostimulants ... did not fall asleep

            I don’t understand WHERE he climbs, with SUCH health? belay

            It can be seen that the dust is already falling ...

            Or wants to take the whole world with him?

            Trump in front of him is an indestructible big teenager ...
            1. +8
              30 September 2020 10: 04
              Quote: Olgovich
              I don't understand WHERE he climbs

              The personnel shortage of the Democratic Party. The only rating figure in the clip. Relying on his subsequent incapacity, and vice, there is Kamala Harris with Indian roots for his mother and a Jamaican negro - dad. Solid BLM. Feminist and black racist.

              But some evil say that she has an Adam's apple, like Michael Obama, Barack's husband wassat
          2. +4
            30 September 2020 11: 05
            Quote: hrych
            Ecstasy fights Trump once again

            Pervitin grandfather. Yes laughing
        2. +2
          30 September 2020 07: 33
          laughing It seems to me that if he were there he would have decided that there is no limit to perfection and he is still learning and learning the American "skill" of conducting discussions.
        3. +4
          30 September 2020 07: 56
          Quote: Ilya-spb
          Wasn't Zhirik? It's a shame ... He would have given a master class.

          And Trump is doing no worse than Zhirik, he is also a master class guy.
          1. +8
            30 September 2020 08: 10
            Y-yes. Democracy on the march. Although, in principle, nothing surprising. We've seen it. Two old men in the courtyard quarreled over a game of chess. The pressure on both sides is consistent. However, intellectual content too. The great Lenin was right when he dreamed that every cook could run the state. In this case, not a cook, but every old one ... The cook has more modest claims - she wants to rule not a huge country, but a small Belarus. And now she is being taken to the hotel to the visiting Frenchman. Shameless.
            1. +2
              30 September 2020 08: 35
              Quote: mikh-korsakov
              Democracy on the march. Although, in principle, nothing surprising. We've seen it. Two old men in the courtyard quarreled over a game of chess. The pressure on both sides is consistent.

              However, these have a dozen aircraft carriers and thermonuclear weapons on the chessboard! The world is in dust ... quarreling.
              1. +1
                30 September 2020 14: 15
                I am interested in these debates from the perspective of the prospects for Russia.
                At one time he was sincerely rooting for Trump.
                But recently he doubted him pretty much.
                IMHO, he says and does the right things to strengthen the States.
                And promises to get along with Russia remain in the air.
                Tillerson and Flynn Trump gave up without batting an eye.
                Steve Bennon went to jail.
                Doubt began to prevail, but will Trump and I be better than Biden? hi
      2. -14
        30 September 2020 06: 50
        Great. There would be such a debate in Russia!
        1. nnm
          +11
          30 September 2020 06: 52
          Look how much you want! For example, the debate between Zhirinovsky and Sobchak!)))) That's another sight. I had never seen one of the presidential candidates cry before. And as you know, it was not Zhirinovsky who let a tear go)))
          1. 0
            30 September 2020 07: 38
            Quote: nnm
            Zhirinovsky let out a tear)))

            hi laughing
            It's good that he has not yet spanked her on the butt ... smile
            We have Vladimir Volfovich a hot man ... smile
            1. +1
              30 September 2020 11: 12
              Quote: Zhan
              It's good that he has not yet spanked her on the butt ...
              We have Vladimir Volfovich a hot man ...

              Hot Zhirik practically only with women and a crowd of guards behind his back ...
          2. +2
            30 September 2020 08: 20
            Quote: nnm
            For example, the debate between Zhirinovsky and Sobchak!))))

            I'd rather watch the debates with Putin's participation.
            1. nnm
              +2
              30 September 2020 08: 20
              With whom, for example?)))
              1. -1
                30 September 2020 08: 28
                Quote: nnm
                Who, for example?

                In your opinion, there is no one? Starting from Zyuganov and ending with Navalny or Udaltsov. Who will be a presidential candidate, let him conduct it, otherwise he is in the debate, I do not remember when I participated.
                1. nnm
                  +5
                  30 September 2020 08: 35
                  Zyuganov would have said routine phrases and stood at attention. Navalny would carry complete nonsense with memorized words, in the end he would receive in advance prepared facts about his crimes and shut up, Udaltsov is just some kind of cheap populist. You just seem to want more of a show with juice pouring, squeals and fights on each other, rather than normal debate. Because it would be boring - just numbers.
                  1. -5
                    30 September 2020 08: 43
                    Quote: nnm
                    Navalny would carry

                    Quote: nnm
                    Zyuganov would

                    Quote: nnm
                    Udaltsov is just some kind of cheap populist.

                    For the first two, you decided what they would say, the third is unworthy.
                    Quote: nnm
                    You just seem to want more of a show with juice pouring, squeals and fights on each other, rather than normal debate.

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnBGnQZzIcM Вот подобные дебаты я хотел бы видеть, сегодня это эталон тактичности и цивилизованного диалога.
                    1. nnm
                      +2
                      30 September 2020 08: 52
                      Well, you also compared !!! Debates of professors on historical issues and a circus performed by politicians with low social responsibility!
                      People like Zhirinovsky survive in politics, not like Yulin. To my great regret.
                      1. -1
                        30 September 2020 09: 24
                        Quote: nnm
                        Professorship debate on historical issues

                        The questions in the video are not at all historical, but rather topical.
                        Quote: nnm
                        and a circus performed by politicians with low social responsibility!

                        What do you think the debates of presidential candidates should be turned into an analogue of the Solovyov political talk show? And besides, do you think only professors know how to be polite? Yes, we have a sufficient number of polite people on our site, although boors, of course, meet the same.
                        1. nnm
                          +3
                          30 September 2020 09: 45
                          Quote: aleksejkabanets
                          What do you think the debates of presidential candidates should be turned into an analogue of the Solovyov political talk show?


                          In my opinion? So it is you who are proposing to arrange this show:
                          Quote: aleksejkabanets
                          Starting from Zyuganov and ending with Navalny or Udaltsov. Whoever is a presidential candidate, let him hold


                          Or the characters you are proposing, or "who will be a candidate, so let them carry out" speaks about something else? Yes, these are pure populists.
                        2. +1
                          30 September 2020 10: 07
                          Quote: nnm
                          In my opinion? So it is you who are proposing to arrange this show:

                          I wrote above, which for me is a model for debate.
                          Quote: nnm
                          Or the characters you are proposing, or "who will be a candidate, so let them carry out" speaks about something else? Yes, these are pure populists.

                          I understand that it is more convenient for you to listen to "non-populists", such as Gref, Nabiulina or Chubais, but they are not the ones who can ask uncomfortable questions about the implementation of the "May Decrees", "Strategy 2010", and now about "Strategy 2020" and much , much more.
                        3. nnm
                          +2
                          30 September 2020 10: 17
                          Quote: aleksejkabanets
                          I understand that it is more convenient for you to listen to "non-populists" such as Gref, Nabiulina or Chubais

                          I love it when they decide for me who is more pleasant for me to listen to / read / watch ...
                        4. nnm
                          0
                          30 September 2020 10: 22
                          Quote: aleksejkabanets
                          they can ask uncomfortable questions about the implementation of the May Decrees, about Strategy 2010, and now about Strategy 2020, and much, much more.


                          Oh, that's for sure !!! Everyone likes to ask questions, as well as point out mistakes. This is not to talk about really feasible solutions. Calculated, proven by numbers, indicating who will perform it and how they will answer for what does not work out. And it turns out that all these persons are the heroes of the fable "The Quartet", no more.
                2. +5
                  30 September 2020 08: 45
                  and did the right thing, there was still not enough debate with the clowns Navalny and Udaltsov.
                  1. -5
                    30 September 2020 08: 48
                    Quote: HUNTERDON
                    and did the right thing, there was still not enough debate with the clowns Navalny and Udaltsov.

                    Debates should be held with other presidential candidates, regardless of personalities. Or are they all unworthy to talk to Putin? Inconvenient questions can you ask?
                    1. -1
                      30 September 2020 13: 26
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      Or are they all unworthy to talk to Putin?

                      Everyone knows that the debate of strong opposition candidates has been banned with the current president even during Yeltsin's re-election. This is one of the ways to manipulate consciousness.
              2. -3
                30 September 2020 11: 22
                Quote: nnm
                With whom, for example?)))

                With Navalny


            2. +1
              30 September 2020 09: 32
              I'd rather watch the debates with Putin's participation.

              Include an annual meeting with journalists - here's the debate. There they will not ask any questions. Including foreign journalists.
              1. -1
                30 September 2020 09: 42
                Quote: Interlocutor
                Include an annual meeting with journalists - here's the debate. There they will not ask any questions. Including foreign journalists.

                Tell me, in your opinion, a debate of presidential candidates and a meeting with journalists with previously agreed topics of issues is the same thing?
                1. +2
                  30 September 2020 09: 45
                  Tell me, in your opinion, a debate of presidential candidates and a meeting with journalists with previously agreed topics of issues is the same thing?

                  Agreed with foreign journalists and Ukrainian journalists?
                  What are you speaking about.
                  Or do you think that a respectable strong president should stand in a circle when Sobchak Zhirinovsky calls him a luch?
                  He does the right thing, that he doesn't mess about "kaku" ...
                  1. -2
                    30 September 2020 09: 47
                    Quote: Interlocutor
                    Or do you think that a respectable strong president should stand in a circle when Sobchak Zhirinovsky calls him a luch?

                    Look at the thread above, it says what I think. And what I consider a model for debate.
                  2. 0
                    30 September 2020 14: 52
                    But didn't he do everything so that there were no worthy competitors in the debate?
                    1. +2
                      30 September 2020 15: 17
                      But didn't he do everything so that there were no worthy competitors in the debate?

                      Do you have proof of this?
                      1. -1
                        1 October 2020 10: 56
                        Grudinin was removed, mud was doused. There was a worthy candidate.
        2. +5
          30 September 2020 07: 04
          All evening in the arena!
          Red-haired clown - Trump and white clown - Biden!
        3. +5
          30 September 2020 07: 37
          To undermine education, to drive the fragments of culture under the plinth, to put moneybags and PZHALUSTA into power without restrictions. We will also have such debates.
        4. +1
          30 September 2020 08: 11
          Such a debate? Go to Zhirinovsky.
      3. +4
        30 September 2020 06: 51
        Grandfathers are old, they don't care)))
      4. +7
        30 September 2020 07: 18
        How cute are they? The comedy will begin when none of the losers recognize the elections as legitimate. Still to come. lol
      5. +3
        30 September 2020 08: 25
        You are stupid @ k! No, you are stupid @ k .... the whole dialogue is in the debate.
      6. The comment was deleted.
      7. 0
        30 September 2020 10: 44
        Quote: marchcat
        Lovely ones scold, only amuse themselves. You can't name it otherwise.

        As I've said many times, elections are such fun for the elites. Give people the illusion of choice ...

        Che there about democracy and freedom was said? fellow
    2. +24
      30 September 2020 06: 45
      Has anyone looked in the original? Share your impressions! Although both are good for us. I'm for Trump, he has a beautiful woman! hi drinks laughing
      1. +2
        30 September 2020 08: 13
        Andrew! Beautiful woman ?! Don't wait! You are for Trump, and I am for Zenit.
        1. 0
          30 September 2020 08: 52
          Never for Zenit, Sochi champion, Rotenberg ahead. hi drinks good
      2. +3
        30 September 2020 10: 03
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Has anyone looked in the original? Share your impressions! Although both are good for us. I'm for Trump, he has a beautiful woman! hi drinks laughing

        - Trumph: "Shut up"
        - Biden: "You f * uckin clown"
        Democracy in all its diversity. Applause.
      3. +1
        1 October 2020 20: 44
        I watched. Both candidates showed themselves as small boys, offended at each other. They called me names, interrupted them, there weren't many konretiki. shame!
    3. +12
      30 September 2020 06: 45
      I wish these two aged crank together would destroy the United States, tearing the country apart in the elections and after them
      1. The comment was deleted.
    4. +7
      30 September 2020 06: 45
      Add Zhirinovsky to this pair of "saints" and the talk show will be great.
      1. +6
        30 September 2020 07: 04
        Quote: Ravik
        To this pair of "saints" add Zhirinovsky and Talk show will be notable.

        Especially if he calls them both agents of Putin and members of United Russia
        1. +3
          30 September 2020 08: 17
          Competition between Putin's agents. I remembered a scene from the classics when Balaganov and Panikovsky quarreled over a kettlebell. "You are a pathetic and insignificant person!"
          1. 0
            30 September 2020 08: 21
            Quote: mikh-korsakov
            Competition between Putin's agents. I remembered a scene from the classics when Balaganov and Panikovsky quarreled over a kettlebell. "You are a pathetic and insignificant person!"

            Saw Shura, she's golden laughing
    5. +5
      30 September 2020 06: 46
      Debate with the words "clown" and "shut up" between Trump and Biden
      Elderly children live merrily. There is complete discord in the country, the possibility of a civil war looms, and they dive at the debates, which are watched with enthusiasm by a third of the country. At the same time, the United States manages to light up wherever riots are brewing and, as a strong man, dictate their conditions of existence. And yet it is interesting how it will all end for the Americans?
      1. +3
        30 September 2020 07: 02
        Quote: rotmistr60
        There is complete discord in the country, the possibility of a civil war looms, and they dive at the debates, which a third of the country watches with enthusiasm.

        And not only looks, but also actively chews popcorn. And after the end of the program, he goes out into the streets and begins to "vote" with his hands, feet, sticks, weapons ...
        1. +1
          30 September 2020 07: 06
          You're right. Therefore, it seems that Americans live inside a show that does not stop for a minute. This is the front side of America, and participation in the wars unleashed by them with a live picture on TV, the pre-election vanity of vanities ... etc., etc.
      2. -2
        30 September 2020 22: 28
        Quote: rotmistr60
        There is complete discord in the country, the possibility of a civil war looms,

        And Yellowstone bangs too, huh? And the United States is ruined?
        laughing
    6. nnm
      +6
      30 September 2020 06: 46
      In general, whoever wins, the losers will do their best to interfere with his work and further destabilize the situation inside the United States. BLM it will be, green, impeachment, further investigations, Mexicans - it doesn't matter. The main thing is that the vaunted system of American government is actually being torn apart for the sake of two groups and there are fewer and fewer points of contact after such a debate among Democrats and Republicans. More precisely, it looks like one of their beloved and remained - Russia is our enemy, let's unite against it and China.
      So whoever wins, it will not be easier or easier for us. The United States will continue its previous policy towards Russia with increasing pressure.
      1. -3
        30 September 2020 06: 52
        For me, everything is fine. One party controls the other, which significantly reduces corruption.
        1. nnm
          +4
          30 September 2020 06: 55
          Well .... maybe this really reduces political corruption, but corruption in the economy is in order there. I don't think we need to mention the prices for NASA and aviation purchases.
          And on the political field - look at the last of the examples with the death and appointment of a new judge of the Supreme Court. In fact, it is pure corruption.
          1. 0
            1 October 2020 20: 47
            Excuse me, why did you get the idea that this is corruption? Please justify. Based on current laws, of course.
        2. +12
          30 September 2020 06: 58
          They have not corruption, but lobbying, an officially legalized way of bringing in dollars for diplomats. Only taxes must be paid. Oil and gas workers put Trump on! hi
          1. nnm
            +8
            30 September 2020 06: 59
            And, I think, the military-industrial complex. And in the USA it is definitely a very powerful group.
            1. -7
              30 September 2020 07: 03
              at least some kind of opposition.
              1. nnm
                +8
                30 September 2020 07: 09
                Well, before Trump there, this opposition was about the same as A Just Russia for United Russia. Two twin brothers, who did not stick to each other especially, but replaced each other with obvious mistakes in the actions of their predecessors. And now it is not clear which is better. For example, how the Democrats simply out of principle blocked the vote to increase the limit on public debt for public administration, when government institutions were simply closed. When you only do 2/3 of the term, you prove that you are not an agent of the Kremlin and the remaining 1/3 of the term you yourself drive Biden in the corruption case. When all your team is constantly shaking from this political turbulence.
                1. -1
                  30 September 2020 07: 12
                  Quote: nnm
                  Well, before Trump there, this opposition was about the same as A Just Russia for United Russia.

                  do not tell ... "elephants" and "donkeys" are still different.
                  1. nnm
                    +6
                    30 September 2020 07: 15
                    As in that joke about the difference between a man and a woman - on the one hand we are the same, but on the other, we are so different!))))
                    There are differences, of course, but I think they are more and more explained not by the difference in approaches on the political or economic field, but by the peculiarities of the electorate that the parties are targeting. That is why Biden does not talk about any global differences in approaches to the economy, but simply crawls on his knees at the coffin of a murdered Negro.
          2. +4
            30 September 2020 08: 20
            Yeah, not corruption, but lobbying. I remembered Ranevskaya. "Faina - there is no such word." "How strange there is no word, but there is a woman!" And another analogy with the legalization of brothels. "Only taxes must be paid"
        3. +3
          30 September 2020 08: 08
          For me, everything is fine. One party controls the other, which significantly reduces corruption

          The fact of the matter is that it is one and the same party. Only the factions are different. Their representatives study the same thing at the same universities and colleges.
          This party defends the interests of capital. The interests of big business are behind each of the senatorial factions. In order to push through a bill with an equal number of supporters and opponents, the senators "agree", ie. simply bribe. But they do it within the framework of the lobbying law. What is the same corruption, but legalized.
      2. 0
        30 September 2020 13: 33
        Quote: nnm
        In general, whoever wins, the losers will do their best to interfere with his work and further destabilize the situation inside the United States.

        While Democrats and Republicans are mired in internecine strife, business and science in the United States is free from attacks from politicians like the case of doctors. Although, in the era of political stability in the United States, Senator McCarthy managed to mock many prominent intellectuals in the United States.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. -2
      30 September 2020 06: 55
      About 100 million Americans watched the debate with the words "clown" and "shut up" between Trump and Biden
      Is it very important for us? winked
      1. +7
        30 September 2020 07: 01
        Russian policy, both foreign and domestic, depends on the election results.
        1. +1
          30 September 2020 07: 10
          Quote: Deniska999
          Russian policy, both foreign and domestic, depends on the election results.

          And how in Ukraine depend on it .... politics, politicians, and other "worthy citizens" (if according to N.V. Gogol)
      2. +2
        30 September 2020 07: 04
        It is important for us.
        Whether we like it or not, the United States is now the largest economy in the world, the strongest army, control over most of the media, over the Internet, over the global financial system ...
        If they "sneeze" there, the whole world "coughs"
        1. +4
          30 September 2020 09: 41
          the strongest army

          They don't have the strongest army - they have the richest army. Don't be confused. Their victories in local wars, as a rule, bribery and betrayal (Iraq)
          Where there was no betrayal (Korea, Vietnam), they did not win.
          Capturing oil lands is not an army victory.
          They do not have victories in wars - they have solutions to problems. They are ready to kill, but not ready to die (Iranian bombardment of US bases).
          They have high-quality modern weapons, they fight them, but they did not defeat them, they only killed.
          Therefore, if you go into a hard fight ... where will the curve lead the Americans ...
    9. +11
      30 September 2020 07: 00
      The United States once criticized the USSR for the age composition of the Politburo and the government.
      Today in the USA from 320 million people, two candidates are nominated - one is 74 years old, the second is 77 years old! The USA degrades, then the sick woman is exposed, then the clowns-marasmatics. I can imagine what was happening in the Western media, if this happened in Russia.
      1. +5
        30 September 2020 08: 59
        They follow the path of the USSR and end up the same ...
    10. +9
      30 September 2020 07: 05
      And these people teach us how to live ?!
    11. -2
      30 September 2020 07: 07
      With all the shortcomings of the candidates, it is still not bad that they criticize each other. Our president is afraid of debate. We need to make them mandatory. I would have looked at Platoshkin with Putin.
      1. +8
        30 September 2020 07: 20
        Is this your criticism? Criticism should be constructive - and this is a farce for the sake of voices, no more ...
        For example, on "VO" to get the plus signs, it is enough to push in the formula "Down with the oligarchs! We need aircraft carriers! The bureaucrats got caught! Housing and communal services are falling! Take everything away! Taxes are torn!"
        And you are provided with plus signs, a lot ...
        At the same time, such slogans do not offer NOTHING real and doable ....
        1. -4
          30 September 2020 07: 39
          Well, what criticism is, the costs of capitalism without a show, no matter how. Well, what now to protect the delicate psyche of the incumbent, or how to select only convenient questions on the hotline?
        2. -4
          30 September 2020 07: 59
          Is this your criticism? Criticism should be constructive - and this is a farce for the sake of votes, no more ..


          In our country, constructive criticism comes only from the lips of Putin. The rest have "farce", "cheap PR", "populism" and generally unconstructive. All political competitors are immediately declared someone's agents and are liquidated (in the transfer sense, of course))
          1. +1
            30 September 2020 10: 05
            Quote: Deck
            farce "," cheap PR "," populism "
            and what is it?
            I won't go far - Platoshkin ...
            One point of the program REDUCES taxes, other paragraph INCREASES funding the army / doctors / teachers and others ..
            Great, isn't it?
            Only under capitalism this is impossible in principle ... Either both decrease or both increase ...

            The second option, with the nationalization of everything and everything, is somehow modest to discuss.
            We passed the variant with the redistribution of property twice in the 20th century - in 1918 and in 1992-93, and both times after that, within 10 years there was devastation and chaos. And if we have not seen "war communism", then from the 90s until now the consequences

            And what then is it if not a cheap PR in the spirit of Zhirinovsky - "every man has a bottle, every woman has a man" ??
            1. -5
              30 September 2020 12: 10
              Today, for the fourth time, if I am not mistaken, our national leader has vigorously and firmly promised to ban round timber for export. This is about the words about PR and populism, by the way.

              I won't go far- Platoshkin ..


              Are you a politician? They should publicly argue about the problems of the country, and not decide quietly, in a businesslike manner with their friends.
    12. +3
      30 September 2020 07: 09
      did you water each other with water? then it’s not good! wassat
      1. +2
        30 September 2020 08: 58
        It's still ahead ... hi
        1. +2
          30 September 2020 09: 02
          hi
          Have you kept the trump cards up your sleeve? wink
          1. +3
            30 September 2020 09: 16
            A serious "fight" is planned there, so yes, all the interesting things for later.
            1. +2
              30 September 2020 09: 22
              Well yes ... the show must go on ... the main thing is to intrigue ...
              1. +3
                30 September 2020 09: 25
                It was a little warm-up, then very serious "arguments" will be included ...
                1. +3
                  30 September 2020 09: 35
                  Popcorn makers have tripled their production rate .... laughing
                  1. +2
                    30 September 2020 09: 43
                    Uh-huh, we are ready for them, the candidates, to slobber deny to maintain their tone ... Yes
    13. -2
      30 September 2020 07: 13
      Quote: Deniska999
      Russian policy, both foreign and domestic, depends on the election results.

      What are you talking about ?! Wow! And how, if I may say so, this "Russian policy" (does it exist at all?) Can depend on the struggle of these clowns?
      Like - to continue to invest Russian money in American "candy wrappers" or not? Or something else? Maybe Biden, once in the Oval Office, will sharply "fall in love" with the Russian Federation, he will say to Erdogan - don't go to Azerbaijan and Syria! How do you imagine all these questions? sad
    14. -7
      30 September 2020 07: 14
      Trump is the funniest and most outrageous US president. It is difficult to imagine a more comical character. The clown is about him.
      1. +4
        30 September 2020 07: 33
        Trump is the funniest and most outrageous US president. It is difficult to imagine a more comical character. The clown is about him.

        Trump is the second president in America (after Kennedy) who does not dance to the tune of the Rothschilds.
        1. 0
          30 September 2020 08: 35
          Do you want to say he dances by himself? Trump is a misunderstanding, a fact.
    15. 0
      30 September 2020 07: 16
      Quote: Jacket in stock
      It is important for us.
      Whether we like it or not, the United States is now the largest economy in the world, the strongest army, control over most of the media, over the Internet, over the global financial system ...
      If they "sneeze" there, the whole world "coughs"

      AND...? What to us, or how should we behave in your mind? sad
      1. +1
        30 September 2020 10: 52
        Quote: Radikal
        AND...? What should we do, or how should we behave

        Wrap yourself in a shroud and crawl towards the cemetery.
        Or stop relying on the goodwill of the "partners" and build a self-sufficient country.
    16. +1
      30 September 2020 07: 25
      The final stage of the show called "American Elections" has begun!
      If it were not for the seriousness of the situation, it would be possible to laugh ... and so, not laughing, very many.
      1. +3
        30 September 2020 08: 57
        This time it will be very unusual and almost impossible to predict.
        Greetings! hi
        1. +2
          30 September 2020 09: 28
          Welcome soldier
          Well, yes, judging by the statements from each of the parties, "fun" is planned EXCLUSIVE !!!
          1. +3
            30 September 2020 09: 42
            Yes, before the elections, and probably after, there will be many new and "interesting" things ...
            1. +2
              30 September 2020 09: 54
              So it is hinted that the result may be .... the same as it was already once!
              Let's see ... we are sitting on the blockade, in fact, we are waiting with.
              1. +1
                30 September 2020 11: 20
                And we have no other choice but to observe from the outside, but the accusations against us will not be measured.
    17. 0
      30 September 2020 07: 41
      Come on, they were just worried about the vocabulary, everything is in the style of Hollywood, striped is no stranger to.
    18. The comment was deleted.
      1. +5
        30 September 2020 08: 42
        imobile2008 (Igor)
        Today, 07: 59
        -2
        And to our clown no one will say shut up, because our coward knows that he will be shut up!
        your clown will definitely be gagged. laughing
    19. +2
      30 September 2020 08: 28
      And the result? Who won the first round of the debate in the audience vote?
      1. +2
        30 September 2020 08: 56
        Latest data 60% for Biden ...
        1. +3
          30 September 2020 09: 19
          Yeah ... we're waiting for the second round of debate. Although Trump, Biden, hell, radish is not sweeter, relations between Russia and the United States will not improve ..
          1. +3
            30 September 2020 09: 22
            It was a light warm-up, but we don't really care who will be the President there, since nothing will change in relation to us.
        2. 0
          30 September 2020 11: 53
          Quote: cniza
          Latest data 60% for Biden ...

          This is according to CNN.
          After Kenosha burned, and the CNN correspondent called it "a generally peaceful protest" against the background of blazing buildings, even many Democratic voters no longer believe CNN
          1. +1
            30 September 2020 11: 59
            These are their problems, they, their media, will bury themselves ...
    20. 0
      30 September 2020 08: 30
      The old men are fluffed up
    21. 0
      30 September 2020 08: 36
      However, instead of constructive discussion, they were more like an uncivilized show in which opponents stoop to the point that they openly call each other names.
      Maybe they were given a Colt, and one cartridge each. bully
      1. +3
        30 September 2020 08: 46
        Quote: aszzz888
        Maybe they were given Colt, and one cartridge each.

        Inflatable clown hammers. We need a series, and with pistols, the show will be short-lived and one-off.
        1. +1
          30 September 2020 08: 48

          g1washntwn (George Washington)
          Today, 08: 46

          0
          Quote: aszzz888
          Maybe they were given Colt, and one cartridge each.

          Inflatable clown hammers. We need a TV series, but with pistols the show will be short-lived and one-offм.
          That is why I say "one cartridge at a time," because the whole world has shaken with their show elections.
    22. +1
      30 September 2020 08: 39
      Just like garbage talk shows on our TV
    23. +1
      30 September 2020 08: 49
      Trump "soaked" Biden with compromising material, and he fought back with slogans
    24. +2
      30 September 2020 08: 55
      However, instead of constructive discussion, they were more like an uncivilized show in which opponents stoop to the point that they openly call each other names. It got to the point of using such a word as "clown".


      The start is given, soon we will hear and see not so much.
    25. 0
      30 September 2020 08: 58
      It is interesting to see the analysis, after the debate, who won? Biden cannot even speak without a prompter, often makes mistakes, but Trump has nothing to say.
    26. 0
      30 September 2020 09: 04
      Who would have guessed at such a debate to slip leaflets with IQ tests to potential presidents .. so that without advisers and cheat sheets ... I suspect that both will not be able to "in the cells" .. and Biden for the reason "did not know how to remove the cap from the handle." ..
    27. +3
      30 September 2020 09: 34
      Trump did Biden.
      Since Biden had to make excuses and demand that Trump shut up.
      A nation of traders and leaders of the level of bazaar traders.
    28. -1
      30 September 2020 10: 19
      "About 100 million Americans watched the debate with the words 'clown' and 'shut up' between Trump and Biden"

      Has Putin ever participated in a debate?
    29. 0
      30 September 2020 11: 06
      We need to give them Sobchak.
    30. 0
      30 September 2020 11: 18
      In connection with such debates, I recalled an old anecdote. One boy spied on what his parents were doing in the bedroom and said in a daze:
      -And these people forbid me to pick my nose !?
    31. 0
      30 September 2020 11: 26
      It is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of the American electoral system when we talk about the opops of the population in the USA on a national scale. Let's say two states with roughly equal numbers of residents, both electing 10 electors. In one, for the Democrats, 70% with a turnout of 80%, in the other for the Republicans, 49%, but they are in first place, with a turnout of 50%. From the first state all electors are Democrats, from the second all Republicans. Although in the first case more than twice as many voters voted for the Democrats.
    32. 0
      30 September 2020 11: 41
      Quote: APASUS
      Interesting to see the analysis

      A couple of days ago, for example, there was such an analysis:
      Moscow. September 22nd. INTERFAX.RU - In the second quarter of 2020, the net asset value of US households and non-profit groups reached a record value amid renewed growth in the stock market and measures to support the economy.
      [i] [/ i] According to the results of this quarter, the welfare indicator jumped by 6,8%, to $ 118,96 trillion, according to data from the Federal Reserve System (FRS). This is about $ 380 billion more than at the end of 2019, before the coronavirus pandemic.
      I wish we had such clowns and so "bend"
    33. +1
      30 September 2020 11: 44
      Made a mistake ...
      It is necessary to put the stands closer and put more glasses of water ...
    34. +1
      30 September 2020 11: 44
      These 100 million viewers have not yet realized that they are already participants in the tragic comedy that has begun, very much complicated by the presence of nuclear and biological weapons in the Crazy States of America.
      This has not yet reached us either ...
    35. +1
      30 September 2020 12: 34
      )))) here are the clowns))) glad that the GDP has not dropped to this! disgrace .. well, trump has experience)) balt)) but Biden can get stuck))
    36. +2
      30 September 2020 13: 15
      Lively interesting discussion.
      The incumbent president and the opposition leader have equal conditions.
      Equal time.
      The moderator does not shut up the opposition leader's mouth, he gives his full opinion.

      An example for many presidents wink
      And for many nations. good
    37. +1
      30 September 2020 13: 30
      Quote: voyaka uh

      An example for many presidents wink
      And for many nations. good

      Is this about chivo? About BLM? Or promises to create a super-duper vaccine?
    38. 0
      30 September 2020 14: 01
      on the good, Trump should have found a successor too. Biden has health at the seams - he hopes for the team and his patrons, but Trump is already tired, but politics is so exciting and addictive that it is unrealistic to refuse)))
    39. +2
      30 September 2020 14: 03
      And yet it's somehow boring, without a "spark", without shooting from Colts ...
      Just think one called the other a clown.
      Where is the glass of water in the face? Where is the hand-to-hand combat for the interests of American blacks? Where is the licking of the dark-skinned boots? Where is the kneeling stand?
      So you can lose the electorate.
      We eat popcorn, we hope to continue ...
      1. +4
        30 September 2020 16: 17
        Quote: prior
        And where

        Everything is ahead. Americans, and the whole world, will have an entertaining show bully
    40. 0
      30 September 2020 14: 05
      Wasn't the orange juice doused?
      Then why oh why ...
    41. +4
      30 September 2020 16: 05
      About 100 million Americans watched the debate with the words "clown" and "shut up" between Trump and Biden

      Americans love freak shows. Especially with such wonderful freaks as Trump and Biden.
    42. 0
      30 September 2020 18: 55
      Quote: marchcat
      Lovely ones scold, only amuse themselves. You can't name it otherwise.

      Whatever you call it, but the Americans will have to CHOOSE. We have no alternative elections. We definitely have CLOWNADE! wassat hi
    43. 0
      30 September 2020 19: 37
      Considering the age of the "candidates", it is surprising that during the "debates" none of them was hugged by Kondraty))) The heart is weak, then ...
    44. 0
      30 September 2020 21: 08
      Yeah, like aunts in the bazaar, and why should they debate, they have a second amendment, it's high time to give the command "To battle".

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"