Soyuz-2.1b launch vehicle with satellites launched from Plesetsk cosmodrome

50
Soyuz-2.1b launch vehicle with satellites launched from Plesetsk cosmodrome

The Russian space forces launched a Soyuz-2.1b carrier rocket with three Gonets-M satellites on board. The rocket was launched from the Plesetsk cosmodrome. This is reported by the Ministry of Defense.

It is noted that the launch was made at 14:20 Moscow time. time from the launcher No. 3 of the site No. 43 of the cosmodrome of the Russian Ministry of Defense Plesetsk in the Arkhangelsk region. The rocket was launched normally.

The Soyuz-2.1b carrier rocket was launched with the Gonets-M communication spacecraft (SC) unit and the associated payload consisting of 19 small spacecraft

- said in a statement.



The military department noted that this launch of the Gonets-M satellites on the Soyuz-2.1b carrier rocket is the first in stories, earlier the satellites were launched into orbit by the Rokot launch vehicles.

On September 12 this year, the Russian government allowed the use of the military infrastructure to launch the Gonets-M spacecraft into orbit, and the corresponding decree was signed by Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin.

The satellites to be launched should be part of the Gonets-D1M global low-orbit satellite system, which is designed to provide communication and data transmission in remote and hard-to-reach areas, including the Far North.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    50 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +6
      28 September 2020 14: 59
      Good luck with launching into orbit!
      1. +4
        28 September 2020 15: 05
        The Union takes out three times more cargo than the Roar.
        1. +7
          28 September 2020 15: 28
          Quote: figvam
          The Union takes out three times more cargo than the Roar.

          More precisely, in LEO (low Earth orbit) by 3,83 times! And it is four orders of magnitude cheaper for 1 kg of cargo to be taken out, with practically the same launch cost.
        2. -1
          28 September 2020 19: 48
          And time-tested, unlike Mask's crafts.
      2. +4
        28 September 2020 21: 10
        Quote: seregin-s1
        Good luck with launching into orbit!


        All 7 Russian and 15 foreign commercial vehicles were launched into target orbits

        Launch video

    2. +5
      28 September 2020 15: 01
      Good luck. fellow
    3. +5
      28 September 2020 15: 03
      I hope I will live to see the moment when such launches will be such an ordinary event that they will no longer write about it in the news ... it's a shame for humanity. All sorts of iPhones and tick-tocks are orders of magnitude more popular than science and progress.
      1. +5
        28 September 2020 15: 05
        Where did these iPhones come from?
        The result of that very science. Progress in the clearest possible way.
        1. +4
          28 September 2020 15: 21
          Quote: Jacket in stock
          Progress in the clearest possible way.

          So it is, but you can't fly to the stars on an iPhone)
          1. +1
            28 September 2020 19: 50
            Quote: Recon
            So it is, but you can't fly to the stars on an iPhone)

            You can fly away, the main thing is to throw in the right substances, and not like in an iPhone - there is a whole Universe on the ceiling laughing
            1. 0
              28 September 2020 20: 24
              no no, I'm not on my way with you here))
              1. 0
                28 September 2020 20: 25
                Quote: Recon
                no no, I'm not on my way with you here))

                I have not tried it myself, but there are familiar "cosmonauts".
      2. 0
        28 September 2020 16: 08
        Quote: Recon
        so commonplace that the news will stop writing about it

        They don't write much even now. In China and the United States, they launch more than once every two weeks. Falcon 9 should fly today at 17.
    4. +1
      28 September 2020 15: 04
      Why is everything normal for the military?
      1. +1
        28 September 2020 19: 51
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        Why is everything normal for the military?

        Because abnormal launches are classified? what
        Because the military priests don’t hack at the consecration of missiles?
        1. -1
          29 September 2020 09: 59
          Quote: Narak-zempo
          Because abnormal launches are classified?
          Because the military priests don’t hack at the consecration of missiles?

          no, not true. Tanya helps them.
    5. 0
      28 September 2020 15: 07
      But it’s interesting.
      How much more expensive Soyuz is than Rokot?
      1. +5
        28 September 2020 15: 16
        Quote: Jacket in stock
        But it’s interesting.
        How much more expensive Soyuz is than Rokot?


        Not much, but displays more satellites at a time.
    6. +1
      28 September 2020 15: 07
      Well, let's go to space. Messengers were sent. Perhaps I will note this case. drinks
    7. +9
      28 September 2020 15: 08
      Photo of the installation of the carrier in the launch facility

    8. 0
      28 September 2020 15: 08
      Well, it is immediately clear that everything is serious in Karabakh.
    9. +12
      28 September 2020 15: 10
      There was also a photo of the satellite "Gnets - M"
      1. +11
        28 September 2020 15: 17
        Quote: Lesorub
        There was also a photo of the satellite "Gnets - M"


        "Gonets-M"

    10. +3
      28 September 2020 15: 13
      Plus three satellites of domestic satellite communications in orbit - that's good. Maybe all the launches to the military again? Well, this Roscosmos .. Let the interplanetary tugs create and so on .., and let the military launch everything .. And give them the Vostochny along with funding - you look and finish building ..
      1. 0
        28 September 2020 15: 19
        At the same time, the budgets should be strictly supervised from several "towers".
        The military are people too.
        1. 0
          28 September 2020 15: 20
          Quote: Livonetc
          At the same time, the budgets should be strictly supervised from several "towers".

          well, that's as usual ..
      2. +6
        28 September 2020 15: 24
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        Plus three satellites of domestic satellite communications in orbit - that's good.


        There are four more domestic university satellites there.

        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        Maybe all the launches to the military again? Well him, this Roscosmos ..


        Roscosmos representatives accompany all military launches.

        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        Let the interplanetary tugs create and so on ..


        The tug is created by KB "Arsenal" - it is a military structure

        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        And give them the Eastern along with financing - you look and they will finish building ..


        Construction at the Vostochny cosmodrome is now being carried out by civil construction organizations. Military builders were just stealing earlier.
        1. -2
          28 September 2020 15: 31
          Quote: slipped

          There are four more domestic university satellites

          Happy flight to them
          Roscosmos representatives accompany all military launches.
          and let them accompany, so long as they don't get into the issues of ensuring the start
          The tug is created by KB "Arsenal" - it is a military structure
          Yes ? Well there is hope for success
          Construction at the Vostochny cosmodrome is being carried out by civil construction organizations.
          That sucks - what a year of promises and sometimes planting of unshared ones. Maybe the military will finish it faster?
          1. +7
            28 September 2020 15: 38
            Quote: KVU-NSVD
            if only they did not get into the issues of providing the start


            They are also involved in launch support - both the rocket and the upper stage were manufactured at the enterprises of Roscosmos, respectively, the support of the plant workers goes on at all stages of the launch.

            Quote: KVU-NSVD
            That sucks - what a year of promises and sometimes planting of unshared ones. Maybe the military will finish it faster?


            What are the promises? Launches from the cosmodrome have been carried out since 2016. Just landing were the leadership of military builders and their subcontractors. who were engaged in the construction of the first stage. The second stage is now being built ahead of schedule.
      3. 0
        28 September 2020 16: 28
        Do you see the difference?))))
        Everything is not simple, but very complicated.
        And the specialists providing the launch are essentially the same.
        Not to mention the manufacturer
        1. -5
          28 September 2020 16: 32
          Quote: U-58
          Do you see the difference?))))
          It's complicated,

          It's simple, I see a difference in recent years with the accident rate of launches from Roscosmos and from the military from Plesetsk. No matter how the message from Plesetsk is, everything is regular, just like about other starts - you immediately get tense ..
          1. +6
            28 September 2020 16: 46
            Quote: KVU-NSVD
            It's simple, I see a difference in recent years with the accident rate of launches from Roscosmos and from the military from Plesetsk.


            Roskosmos has not had any launch accidents for the past two years. From all spaceports.
            1. -3
              28 September 2020 17: 24
              Quote: slipped
              Roskosmos has not had any launch accidents for the past two years. From all spaceports.

              Quote: slipped
              Roskosmos has not had any launch accidents for the past two years. From all spaceports.

              Firstly, there were, and secondly, the military did not have them. In Russia, the main programs are best trusted by the military. They also steal, of course, but the result is given with the appropriate input ..
              1. 0
                28 September 2020 21: 06
                Quote: KVU-NSVD
                Firstly, there were, and secondly, the military did not have them.


                Did not have. The last launch accident happened on October 11, 2018. Then, due to improper assembly of the Soyuz-FG first-stage package, Soyuz MS-10 did not enter orbit.
          2. 0
            28 September 2020 19: 50
            Everyone sees what he wants. Well ... see further ...
      4. -3
        28 September 2020 17: 29
        lus three satellites of domestic satellite communications in orbit is good. Maybe all the launches to the military again? Well, this Roscosmos .. Let the interplanetary tugs create and so on .., and let the military launch everything .. And give them the Eastern along with funding - you look and finish building ..

        Yes, let him shut down at all, who needs to be employed, and let the spectacular managers entertain themselves! hi
        1. -1
          28 September 2020 17: 32
          Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
          and let it shut down altogether,

          Who? Vostochny or Roskosmos? If Roscosmos, then I support it.
          1. -1
            28 September 2020 17: 50
            If Roskosmos, then I support it.

            About him dear!
            1. 0
              28 September 2020 17: 53
              Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
              If Roskosmos, then I support it.

              About him dear!

              I say - to hand over everything to the military - although they steal there, they do not ignore the central control, but bring the tasks to mind.
    11. +2
      28 September 2020 16: 21
      That's strange. The civilian Falcon, the engineer and the inventor, Elon Musk, throws with great fanfare the civilian communication satellites StarLink. At the same time, it is not NASA that bladoares him, but the Pentagon.
      At the same time, quietly and casually, without fanfare and pathos, ours are also creating a network of satellites in orbit. At the same time, the civilian Roscosmos is already using the military infrastructure for civilian purposes.
      At the same time, common people accuse Russia of militarizing outer space. Paradox!
    12. -5
      28 September 2020 16: 23
      Well, at least someone in Russia takes off.
      Let's hope it's successful!
      1. +5
        28 September 2020 16: 52
        Quote: zwlad
        Well, at least someone in Russia takes off.


        Russia also takes off. The next launch is the launch of the Soyuz MS-17 spacecraft, the cosmonauts and the astronaut have already arrived at Baikonur:

    13. 0
      28 September 2020 17: 30
      I am glad that there are smart, purposeful people in Russia who launch satellites into space! They could trade successfully, but they make satellites! Bravo!
      1. +1
        28 September 2020 21: 14
        Quote: seregin-s1
        They could trade successfully


        In this launch, 15 commercial spacecraft were launched. For money.
    14. +3
      28 September 2020 21: 12
      Quote: Vladimir61
      And four orders of magnitude cheaper for

      The order is 10 times, four orders is 10000 times. For the sake of the "catch phrase", the orders are inserted into the commentary. You are right, 3,83 TIMES!
    15. 0
      29 September 2020 02: 30
      Quote: Vladimir61
      four orders of magnitude cheaper

      How much cheaper? "order of magnitude" can mean anything.
    16. 0
      29 September 2020 02: 33
      Quote: Recon
      I hope I will live to see the moment when such launches will be such an ordinary event that they will stop writing about it in the news ..

      So do I.
    17. -1
      29 September 2020 11: 26
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      Ambitious and interesting. I am sure that Mask there will be a lot of failures and failures ahead, but without them there will be no successes.

      And where are the same wishes for Russian space? There are no them here. All this ... very strange ...
      Or is someone else's success so happy that your teeth are reduced? laughing
      1. 0
        29 September 2020 14: 08
        ... so far I see only two minuses, my hands, too, in a cramp once into a topic, cannot even fall through. More cons - grit your teeth harder! ... maybe they will all crumble out of you. lol
    18. -1
      29 September 2020 11: 38
      but where there is a mask for us to some adventurer; everything is bad with us, but in their America and Israel, all the "great and smart"

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"