Military Review

The US Navy received a new destroyer "Arlie Burke"

62

The United States Navy commissioned the Arleigh Burke-class missile destroyer USS Delbert D Black (DDG-119) during a ceremony held September 26 in Port Canaveral, Florida.


The new ship is named after the first master chief petty officer of the American fleet... This title is held by only one representative of sailors and petty officers, who represents and defends their interests in the highest leadership of the armed forces.

DDG-119, the 68th Arleigh Burke URO destroyer, was built by Huntington Ingalls Industries in Pascagoul, Mississippi. It will be based in Mayport, Florida, alongside sister ships USS The Sullivans (DDG 68), USS Lassen (DDG 82), USS Farragut (DDG 99), USS Thomas Hudner (DDG 116) and USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117).

Arleigh Burke-class destroyers form the backbone of the US Navy's surface fleet. These highly efficient multipurpose ships carry out a wide variety of operations - from military presence in peacetime to national security.

- indicates the Navy Recognition edition.

The destroyer has a crew of 380 sailors and officers. It is armed with Mk 41 launchers (one launcher with 32 and 64 cells, 96 RIM-66 SM-2, BGM-109 Tomahawk or RUM-139 VL-Asroc missiles), one 130-mm gun, two 25-mm automatic cannons Mk 38, four 12.7-mm machine guns, two three-tube Mk 32 tubes with Mk 46 torpedoes and one 20-mm Phalanx CIWS anti-aircraft system.

As a power plant, 4 General Electric LM2500 gas turbine engines are used, developing a maximum speed of 31 knots.
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Asad
    Asad 27 September 2020 05: 35
    -1
    No one wants to congratulate opponents! What does seven feet under the keel sound like the other way around?
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 27 September 2020 05: 38
      10
      Quote: ASAD
      What does seven feet under the keel sound like the other way around?

      like this: a big ship, a big torpedo. yes
    2. KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD 27 September 2020 08: 04
      10
      Quote: ASAD
      What does seven feet under the keel sound like the other way around?

      Probably seven feet above the cloth
    3. Slon_on
      Slon_on 27 September 2020 10: 24
      +1
      Seven reefs under the keel!
    4. Subtext
      Subtext 27 September 2020 11: 22
      +5
      Nothing like that, appearance ...

    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. Ax Matt
      Ax Matt 28 September 2020 01: 41
      0
      The fastest transition from surface to submerged position laughing
  2. Grandfather
    Grandfather 27 September 2020 05: 35
    +6
    The US Navy received a new destroyer "Arlie Burke"
    unpleasant, but nothing can be done ...
    1. Victor_B
      Victor_B 27 September 2020 05: 37
      +4
      Quote: Dead Day
      unpleasant, but nothing can be done ...

      Unfortunately, not a bad trough ...
      Decent.
      Mighty.
      Successful.
      And a lot of them ...
      1. unhappy
        unhappy 27 September 2020 07: 11
        13
        Not a trough, a full-fledged battle ship. We call this cruiser sad
        1. Victor_B
          Victor_B 27 September 2020 08: 01
          -10 qualifying.
          Quote: unhappy
          Decent.
          Mighty.
          Successful.
          And a lot of them ..

          And why did this definition not suit you?
          Behind "trough"offended?
          So I am also F-35 only Penguin I call.
          Take offense again.
          1. unhappy
            unhappy 27 September 2020 08: 14
            +4
            You are strange, my condolences. sad
            To throw mud at what you would like but is not available, not like a man, that's what women do.
            1. Victor_B
              Victor_B 27 September 2020 08: 37
              -5
              Quote: unhappy
              To throw mud at what you would like but not available

              How much dirt did you see in the words:
              Decent.
              Mighty.
              Successful.
              And a lot of them ..
              Liberalism is contagious!
              You have to be more tolerant.
              By the way, could you, at the same time, enlighten me, the gray one, what is so issued (well, except for the price) of the F-35 Penguin?
              1. unhappy
                unhappy 27 September 2020 08: 47
                11
                A trough can be called an old rusty and dirty ship, whose place is in the ship's cemetery. This is a derogatory definition, this is verbal filth!
                You, not me, gave this definition to a beautiful new ship with powerful weapons. You did not insult me, but the ship. Ask any sailor - does the ship have soul and destiny?
                1. Sergey Averchenkov
                  Sergey Averchenkov 27 September 2020 09: 13
                  -5
                  Something incomprehensible is happening with the comments - I read about our ships - a continuous whine about shifts to the right, about unsuccessful designs, about the fact that completely different ships are needed ... I read about the ships of a potential enemy -
                  "Decent.
                  Mighty.
                  Successful.
                  And a lot of them .. "
                  I honestly can't understand ... can you tell me something?
                  1. Victor_B
                    Victor_B 27 September 2020 09: 35
                    -2
                    Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
                    can you tell me something?

                    Only to myself ...
                    Well, I do not dare to praise the enemy's technique.
                    But about her dignity and the fears caused by this ... Wai and not notes?
                    I can both scold and praise my technique. Depending on the.
                    But I just can't stand the unbridled praise.
                    In terms of the number of pennants, even the USSR could not reach the USA.
                    In terms of composition ... I'm not a naval theorist, and I'm not a practitioner.
                    1. Sergey Averchenkov
                      Sergey Averchenkov 27 September 2020 09: 47
                      0
                      As a rule, extremes are not a fact (everything is bad with us, but the USA is excellent, as well as vice versa), the truth is usually somewhere in between. But in which direction this middle will begin to lean ... I like messages with arguments - why it is good (or bad), how to do better, etc. And "worthy, capable" ... well, what kind of argument is this - a slogan.
                  2. unhappy
                    unhappy 27 September 2020 09: 57
                    +6
                    This is called reality, this site claims to be an objective analysis. Don't you like the state of affairs with shipbuilding? We are not happy about this if we do not understand hi
                    1. Sergey Averchenkov
                      Sergey Averchenkov 27 September 2020 21: 56
                      0
                      Reality? If I actually dig up my grandfather's "maxim" ... this will be reality. I'm not a sailor (from the stove) :), I'm a specialist in optoelectronic and quantum electronic technology for flight crews (that's the name of my VUS), but I like ships, I even have a boat and a motor. :) And on a wakeboard I can, though old. Come on - a lyrical digression ... But in fact we have all the shit and it's time for us to surrender to the mercy of the United States? All? The end? Well, here I do not agree with you - I will die, but there is a reason to gnaw the USA. I alone will be like an aircraft carrier. :) Forget about the site, there are many of them - one or two will die - others will appear.
                      1. unhappy
                        unhappy 28 September 2020 07: 07
                        0
                        Please, please! Don't attribute words to other people that they never said.
                        I have not met anyone here on the site who would offer to surrender to America. I did not notice the statements "our ships are shit".
                        If you want to drain your negativity - look for liberals where they are a handful, on your sites. hi
                      2. Sergey Averchenkov
                        Sergey Averchenkov 28 September 2020 17: 15
                        0
                        Where did I attribute something? In general, I rarely speak, unless something outrages me or I know exactly what is wrong. There is bitterness because of what you say. It seems that we are all for Russia, but for a different Russia.
                      3. unhappy
                        unhappy 29 September 2020 07: 19
                        0
                        ... And in fact, we have all the shit and it's time for us to surrender to the mercy of the United States? All? The end? Well, here I disagree with you

                        This is your quote, this appeal is addressed to me or a group of individuals who offered surrender at the mercy of the United States. I've never done this. Please analyze and do not confuse who says what and when. hi
              2. NEXUS
                NEXUS 27 September 2020 11: 37
                +9
                Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
                I honestly can't understand ... can you tell me something?

                Because today, the leadership of our Immense, in fact, scored on the fleet in the topic of surface ships of the ocean zone from the word completely.
                Let me give you an example ... TARK Nakhimov. Where is he in the Navy? How many years has it been modernized?
                I will remind you of the words of the LADY, when the Ukrainians and Germans refused to supply us with power plants ... he said, if necessary, we will put nuclear SUs on the frigates.
                It is clear that the YSU on the frigate is today an idiocy, but excuse me, but where is the much-advertised destroyer Leader?
                On Peresvet, Burevesnik, on Poseidon, they developed and stuck a nuclear power plant, but on a decent destroyer, well, NOT SHMOGLA.
                In the issue of new submarines, everything is also very vague. Of the new projects, the relatively successful one is Borey-A. But here, too, a hat was drawn. Because behind Borey-A, Borey-B should have already been laid, but they safely forgot about him, deciding to rivet only Boreas with the letter A.
                I am generally silent about VNEU. Here either swear or cry.
                Well, we rivet Varshavyanka, who will be a hundred years old on Thursday and in all announcements, hitting ourselves with the heel in the chest, proudly declare, the Americans nicknamed her "Black Hole". But of these uryakolok, few people look at the performance characteristics of even the modernized Varshavyanka. And there, the speed is not impressive, nor the depth of diving. In other words, the Varshavyanka is not a multipurpose, and not a hunter, but an ambush submarine, sharpened for strikes on the coast with Caliber, or for closure of straits.
                And the last ... just work hard and take a look at the quantitative and qualitative decline of ships and the introduction of new ones, as well as those ships that have been waiting for YEARS to be repaired or upgraded. It's still sadder there.
                And all this is not whining, but reality, from which there is no way out yet.
                1. Sergey Averchenkov
                  Sergey Averchenkov 27 September 2020 22: 20
                  0
                  Yes, I know you don't like the manual, read your posts. But you see, what's the matter ... I'll try to be objective - the first thing we need to restore is the land or the fleet? It's simple - you are the president of Russia, what would you restore first? Yes, the fleet is lagging behind, but it seems to me that we must first strengthen what is most important to us. And the most important thing is strategic missiles, this is the same Poseidon, this is the vanguard and something else, hell, you'll understand. It seems to be there. And while there is, no one will rock the boat.
                  1. Ryusey
                    Ryusey 28 September 2020 08: 14
                    0
                    And what threats, at the moment, are there on land that require a dramatic increase in ground forces? Where is the main enemy located? What is more dangerous, the appearance of one US armored division on our borders or the enemy SSBNs with ballistic missiles equipped with hypersonic warheads that have come close to us, thereby sharply reducing the flight time in the flesh to critical parameters? Does a mobile reserve of 1000 +/- aircraft with elite crews play a role in the upcoming battles?
                    Answer these questions and everything will become clear.
                  2. Sergey Averchenkov
                    Sergey Averchenkov 28 September 2020 17: 28
                    0
                    Not growth, putting in order, fighting efficiency. Where is the enemy? USA. They don't have hyper yet. But if you can reason sensibly ... it is not us at their borders, but they are at ours. All the rest is rubbish - they are at our borders.
                  3. Ryusey
                    Ryusey 29 September 2020 15: 44
                    0
                    "Not yet" in our time, with due diligence and perseverance, quickly turns into "already is and is in service." The rest of your comment is some kind of confusion.
            2. Lara Croft
              Lara Croft 28 September 2020 00: 45
              +1
              Quote: NEXUS
              Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
              I honestly can't understand ... can you tell me something?

              Because today, the leadership of our Immense, in fact, scored on the fleet in the topic of surface ships of the ocean zone from the word completely.

              I have an old magazine "ZVO" in '89 in my couch, so there in one of the articles was written a strategy for the development of the PLA Navy, according to it they are now going through the construction phase of the Navy of the far sea zone, and they are only now thinking about creating an ocean-going navy. ... and make the prerequisites for its construction ...
              And it is logical to argue if, in order to build the Russian ocean-going navy, the necessary shipbuilding base is needed, but it has not yet been created, shipyards are only being built and modernized, and in order to pay off they need to build civilian ships from nothing. ..
              In other words, Varshavyanka is not a multipurpose vehicle, and not a hunter, but an ambush submarine, sharpened for strikes on the coast with Caliber, or for closing the straits.

              Nobody demands more from her, for the ocean zone there is a submarine / SSGN ...
              The United States does not, and the British, after the end of the Cold War, abandoned their submarines with conventional EI ...
              work hard and look at the quantitative and qualitative decline of ships and the introduction of new ones, as well as those ships that have been waiting for YEARS to be repaired or upgraded. It's still sadder there

              Strange you, some kind of decline is due to the ships built in the USSR, where will the new ones come from, if the Program for the renewal of the ship's composition was adopted relatively recently ...
              In our country, even under the Soviet Union, all BDK and many auxiliary ships of the Navy were built in the GDR or Poland ...
          2. Lara Croft
            Lara Croft 28 September 2020 00: 25
            0
            Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
            Something incomprehensible is happening with the comments - I read about our ships - a continuous whine about shifts to the right, about unsuccessful designs, about the fact that completely different ships are needed ... I read about the ships of a potential enemy -
            "Decent.
            Mighty.
            Successful.
            And a lot of them .. "

            You do not understand
            potential enemy ships
            "this is different ..."
  3. Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg)
    Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg) 27 September 2020 11: 55
    +1
    > Take offense again

    the last bread from Russian patriots is taken away, demons
  • NEXUS
    NEXUS 27 September 2020 09: 32
    -9
    Quote: unhappy
    Not a trough, a full-fledged battle ship. We call this cruiser sad

    We call this a frigate. Burke needs to grow to a cruiser.
    1. unhappy
      unhappy 27 September 2020 09: 52
      +3
      Displacement and autonomy are similar, we have three such cruisers (a ship of the far sea zone).
      The armament is similar - 96 missile launch cells, such a frigate will not pull. A frigate is by definition a guard ship with weapon optimization for defense. Burke will guard the bases?
      The speed, now the frigates are doing about 27 knots. Cruisers go faster.
      Etc..
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 27 September 2020 11: 14
      +9
      This Burke has a displacement of 9,300 tons and a length of 160 meters.
      Ticonderoga-class cruisers with a length of 173 meters.
      So, the last Burks (their length is increased) are clearly pulling on
      the title "cruiser".
      1. Lara Croft
        Lara Croft 28 September 2020 00: 48
        -1
        Quote: voyaka uh
        This Burke has a displacement of 9,300 tons and a length of 160 meters.
        Ticonderoga-class cruisers with a length of 173 meters.
        So, the last Burks (their length is increased) are clearly pulling on
        the title "cruiser".

        So they were created to replace the expensive (even for the USA) CR URO of the "Ticonderoga" type (if I am not mistaken, 26 units were built over the years of the Cold War). a budget option...
    3. Ryusey
      Ryusey 28 September 2020 08: 17
      -1
      I don't know how and where to grow Burke, but you still have to grow and grow ...
  • YOUR
    YOUR 27 September 2020 06: 19
    +3
    Another unpleasant thing:
    Two independent teams of specialists have proposed that the United States have a fleet of 480 to 534 ships. The immediate plans are to increase the Navy to 2030 ships by 355.

    According to the head of the Pentagon, 355 ships may not be enough to confront Russia and China, so he called for an even greater increase in the forces of the US Navy.

    It’s unpleasant that they are constantly building up their naval forces by equipping them with long-range high-precision ammunition.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 27 September 2020 17: 24
      -1
      Quote: YOUR
      It’s unpleasant that they are constantly building up their naval forces by equipping them with long-range high-precision ammunition.

      hi
      Well, so the image of the "first" power must be maintained. They do not spare money for this, since the machine prints without days off and sleep breaks. And about where the goat-bearded Sam's nose has not yet stuck out, I am silent and give the prerogative to the "Pentagon officials":
    2. Ryusey
      Ryusey 28 September 2020 08: 17
      -1
      Yeah, they sharpen their teeth on China and not only).
  • Mouse
    Mouse 27 September 2020 05: 44
    -6
    Trouble ... tremble, beacons ... wassat
  • Errr
    Errr 27 September 2020 06: 03
    +5
    From the text of the article:
    It is armed ... with two Mk 46 torpedo tubes (each with three cells) ...
    Dear author, this destroyer is armed with three-pipe (what has three cells to do with it? what) torpedo tubes Mk 32, and Mk 46 - these are the torpedoes that pop out of the entity vehicles. smile
  • Doccor18
    Doccor18 27 September 2020 06: 59
    +2
    I read that they won't put Falanx on the last modification of the Berks .. But no, they do ...
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 27 September 2020 08: 01
      +8
      This is still an old man with minor updates - Flight IIA TI.

      Another 6 ships under this project will be handed over.

      The latest modification is Flight III - the head DDG-125 has been under construction for a year.
  • sleeve
    sleeve 27 September 2020 07: 29
    -1
    And where can you listen / read about the effectiveness of the "dagger" on the surface maneuvers?
    1. Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg)
      Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg) 27 September 2020 22: 51
      0
      Don't just switch Russia 24, they will tell you over time
      1. sleeve
        sleeve 28 September 2020 02: 35
        0
        Great resource. Thanks for the advice, but they have already told. "Can get into the ship" as it is not a very complete "conclusion". I'm wondering if there is a more complete opinion ...
  • Avior
    Avior 27 September 2020 08: 19
    +2
    Correct the caliber by 127 mm.
    Approximately 130 smile but it hurts the eye.
  • fa2998
    fa2998 27 September 2020 11: 30
    +7
    As Zadornov said, "how stupid they are," 68 destroyers have already been built. request By the way, here many argued that such ships are no longer needed lol With the money from one destroyer, you can build 10-15 different corvettes and MRK river-sea. As ours do! They need to send our admiral as a consultant from the General Staff of the Navy. laughing hi
  • RealPilot
    RealPilot 27 September 2020 14: 06
    0
    And they have not yet reached the heights of tolerance, disorder! angry

    I really thought that Delbert D BLACK will be BLACK wassat bully belay
    But no, white and traditional! So, it’s time for them to change frames. The blacker the better ...

    On the other hand, we have already seen pirate flags on US destroyers ... Comrades are on the right path.
  • Sergey Kulikov_3
    Sergey Kulikov_3 27 September 2020 15: 21
    -5
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
    I honestly can't understand ... can you tell me something?

    Because today, the leadership of our Immense, in fact, scored on the fleet in the topic of surface ships of the ocean zone from the word completely.
    Let me give you an example ... TARK Nakhimov. Where is he in the Navy? How many years has it been modernized?
    I will remind you of the words of the LADY, when the Ukrainians and Germans refused to supply us with power plants ... he said, if necessary, we will put nuclear SUs on the frigates.
    It is clear that the YSU on the frigate is today an idiocy, but excuse me, but where is the much-advertised destroyer Leader?
    On Peresvet, Burevesnik, on Poseidon, they developed and stuck a nuclear power plant, but on a decent destroyer, well, NOT SHMOGLA.
    In the issue of new submarines, everything is also very vague. Of the new projects, the relatively successful one is Borey-A. But here, too, a hat was drawn. Because behind Borey-A, Borey-B should have already been laid, but they safely forgot about him, deciding to rivet only Boreas with the letter A.
    I am generally silent about VNEU. Here either swear or cry.
    Well, we rivet Varshavyanka, who will be a hundred years old on Thursday and in all announcements, hitting ourselves with the heel in the chest, proudly declare, the Americans nicknamed her "Black Hole". But of these uryakolok, few people look at the performance characteristics of even the modernized Varshavyanka. And there, the speed is not impressive, nor the depth of diving. In other words, the Varshavyanka is not a multipurpose, and not a hunter, but an ambush submarine, sharpened for strikes on the coast with Caliber, or for closure of straits.
    And the last ... just work hard and take a look at the quantitative and qualitative decline of ships and the introduction of new ones, as well as those ships that have been waiting for YEARS to be repaired or upgraded. It's still sadder there.
    And all this is not whining, but reality, from which there is no way out yet.

    The chief is all gone! They have 68 berks ...
    Yes, even if up to 1000 pieces are riveted, this is not our grief, they need to spill overseas residences, we do not have such a problem. And you don't need to get into this race, to destroy wasps, they burn wasps' nests, and do not chase wasps.
    1. Ryusey
      Ryusey 28 September 2020 08: 20
      0
      Do you have your nests to burn, or, as usual, should others do it for you?)
  • Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 27 September 2020 17: 43
    -5
    In light of stealth events, some yon is not stealth.
    Somehow it's not Feng Shui ...
    Well, how some "Varshavyanka" bounces on it with something larger than a kettlebell ... For old memory. In the waters of the Black Sea. This will be a turn ...
  • Hiller
    Hiller 27 September 2020 18: 27
    -1
    The news is not pleasant.
  • Lara Croft
    Lara Croft 28 September 2020 00: 21
    -1
    It is armed with Mk 41 launchers (one launcher with 32 and 64 cells, 96 RIM-66 SM-2, BGM-109 Tomahawk or RUM-139 VL-Asroc missiles), one 130-mm gun, two 25-mm automatic cannons Mk 38, four 12.7-mm machine guns, two three-pipe Mk 32 tubes with Mk 46 torpedoes and one 20-mm anti-aircraft complex Phalanx CIWS.

    That's good ... there are almost no air defense weapons fellow
    1. Ryusey
      Ryusey 28 September 2020 08: 23
      0
      96 RIM-66, SM-2 missiles, is there no air defense ?! But for the most part, there are allies for air defense and anti-aircraft defense (brit, yap, etc.
      1. Lara Croft
        Lara Croft 28 September 2020 08: 49
        0
        Quote: Ryusey
        96 RIM-66, SM-2 missiles, is there no air defense ?!

        In the article, it seems that only 96 different classes are written in Russian .... do you think there will be only missiles in vertical launch mines?
        It would be better if they crammed anti-ship missiles there .... how with the PLA navy, they will fight in the South China Sea defending themselves with missiles ... and striking the coast of the KR MB? And how will they fight with 60 Chinese URO corvettes, and after all, the PRC has a program for the construction of URO destroyers ...
        1. Ryusey
          Ryusey 28 September 2020 11: 22
          -1
          The number of berks allows them to be specialized, and the "standard" equipment includes filling at least half of the cells of missiles of different ranges. And do not forget that the standards are not bad at hitting surface targets, which has been proven by the Iranians.
          And they will break China and China with only AB, fortunately 6 AUG of the Pacific Fleet will allow this to be done without too much straining.
          1. Lara Croft
            Lara Croft 28 September 2020 22: 49
            +1
            Quote: Ryusey
            And they will break China and China with only AB, fortunately 6 AUG of the Pacific Fleet will allow this to be done without too much straining.

            I think the first wave of planes (which will survive) will have nowhere to return ... no need to count everyone as idiots ...
            1. Ryusey
              Ryusey 29 September 2020 15: 41
              -2
              Think, it is generally useful to think, it is especially useful to think while understanding the issue.
              1. Lara Croft
                Lara Croft 29 September 2020 19: 47
                +1
                Quote: Ryusey
                Think, it is generally useful to think, it is especially useful to think while understanding the issue.

                And you there too, "the only thinker" ...
                1. Ryusey
                  Ryusey 30 September 2020 07: 48
                  0
                  By the way, fortunately not the only one ...
                  And on the topic, for a successful strike on the bank of the AUG, more precisely, the AUS does not need to come closer than 1,5-1k. kilometers, what can the PLA threaten at this distance? Nothing, their teeth are dull and small). And why hammer the mainland, it is enough to gouge their useless little bulk islands, halve their fleet and introduce a naval blockade, and all this is quite within the reach of the TF and the US Air Force, so ...
  • Victorio
    Victorio 28 September 2020 18: 48
    0
    became the 68th destroyer URO project "Arleigh Burke"
    ===
    "Bake" like hot cakes
    1. Ryusey
      Ryusey 30 September 2020 08: 02
      0
      And that makes sense.
  • IC
    IC 28 September 2020 20: 44
    -1
    Sometimes the comments resemble a discussion about an opera that none of them have heard. At the same time, many live in some kind of illusion and in some other country. The real state of the economy, finance, social problems do not exist for them. There will be no life until aircraft carriers, Leaders, etc. are built.
    And where and on what shishi is not important. In terms of the number of surface ships, the Pacific Fleet is second only to the United States and China, but already to Japan and South Korea, because. these countries are leaders in world shipbuilding and it is not a problem to build a battleship technologically for them. And the other components will be supplied by the allies. The problems of the submarine fleet are discussed in sufficient detail on the portal.