New BMP "Lynx" passed in front of NATO troops

47
New BMP "Lynx" passed in front of NATO troops

The German company Rheinmetall presented its new Lynx KF41 infantry fighting vehicle at the exercises of the North Atlantic Alliance. The demonstration took place on September 22, 2020 in Hungary during the NATO "Brave Warrior" maneuvers.

This is a significant milestone for our LYNX team to see this vehicle for the first time in the Allied military theater. We received a huge amount of positive feedback from the military!

- noted in Rheinmetall.



The place for the demonstration of the new product, apparently, was not chosen by chance. Hungary, which purchased 218 BMPs of this type in September this year for more than 2 billion euros, is the first customer of the KF41 Lynx. At the same time, even the Bundeswehr did not acquire it.

The video shows the movement of the BMP in front of the troops. The footage shows NATO military equipment in a sandy color, including the Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, with which the Lynx is apparently comparable in size.

Lynx is produced in two versions (KF stands for "Kettenfahrzeug", which means tracked vehicle in German): Lynx KF31 weighing up to 38 tons, crew 3 + 6, and Lynx KF41 of slightly larger weight, crew 3 + 8. As the main caliber is a Wotan 35 cannon with an electric drive, which, as indicated, "shoots tested and in service 35x228mm ammunition from Rheinmetall."

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    47 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +7
      26 September 2020 05: 00
      nothing ... so futuristic in appearance. nothing more to say.
      1. +7
        26 September 2020 05: 41
        Why does it hurt the futuristic?
        Barrel protective cover?
        So they showed it to us 5-7 years ago on promising Russian models of armored vehicles ...
        1. 0
          26 September 2020 05: 54
          Quote: hydrox
          Why does it hurt the futuristic?
          Barrel protective cover

          Yes. and at least not fenced in "birdhouses" outside.
          1. +7
            26 September 2020 10: 11
            It is still necessary to wait a while: how will they begin to install combat protective equipment, a Curtain-some, again, active armor, smoke pipes ... - but you never know what - so birdhouses and turrets must be sure will appear. Although there is one birdhouse on the tower, and there is already a periscope nearby ...
        2. +5
          26 September 2020 12: 47
          Did they show us a lot, what went into the series?
          1. +2
            26 September 2020 22: 12
            Quote: karpusha
            Did they show us a lot, what went into the series?

            Duc has already purchased 218 pieces. What is not a series ?!
            1. +2
              26 September 2020 22: 15
              I'm talking about armata with boomerangs and so on.
        3. 0
          27 September 2020 18: 21
          Tell me where these models are. Would like to watch.
      2. +8
        26 September 2020 05: 54
        Futuristic look and bigger than a tank. The frames show the code driving past them. Well ...
        Leopard -
        Length with a gun forward, mm 9540
        Width, mm 3250
        Height, mm 2400

        BMP Lynx -
        Length: 7,7 m
        Width: 3,6 m
        Height: 3,3 m
        1. +7
          26 September 2020 06: 38
          Quote: YOUR
          Futuristic look and bigger than a tank. The frames show the code driving past them. Well ...
          Quote: hydrox
          In general, the goal is so good, voluminous ...

          So I drew attention to the height. One meter (!) Higher than the BMP-3 and BMD. And in terms of booking, it's not a tank at all ...
          1. +5
            26 September 2020 11: 17
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            One meter (!) Higher than the BMP-3 and BMD.

            But in comparison with Kurganets, it is almost the same in height. Plus minus.
            1. +2
              26 September 2020 11: 39
              Quote: Hyperion
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              One meter (!) Higher than the BMP-3 and BMD.

              But in comparison with Kurganets, it is almost the same in height. Plus minus.

              And who said that Kurganets was our undoubted design success?
              Since 2015, consignments of vehicles for experimental military operation have been sent. As a disadvantage, the military called the high profile of the car. Despite the fact that the profile of "Kurganets" in height is approximately the same as that of its western counterparts (48 mm higher than that of M2 Bradley, and 58 mm lower than that of the German Puma), as well as the same thickness of armor , the Russian military, traditionally preferring low-profile vehicles, call it "a grenade launcher's dream."
              1. +9
                26 September 2020 13: 04
                For modern anti-tank systems, the size of the BMP is no longer a significant parameter for effective destruction. Yes, and the soldier now went bigger - to sit huddled in a low Behe ​​reluctance.
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                the Russian military, traditionally preferring low-profile vehicles,

                Don't want to ride horses into battle "traditionally"? Or go to the bayonet? After all, "traditionally" Russian soldiers were famous for their bayonet fighting. And low profile mine protection is out of tune.
                Again the generals are preparing for the past wars.
                1. +2
                  26 September 2020 15: 06
                  Quote: Hyperion
                  After all, "traditionally" Russian soldiers were famous for their bayonet fighting. And low profile mine protection is out of tune.
                  Again the generals are preparing for the past wars.

                  With bayonet fighting, everything is in order - they taught me, and for several decades I have been trying to keep in shape. I didn't have to deal with modern ATGMs, but they never went inside - precisely because of the mines. Because the "tractor drivers" have always been somehow in a special pity - they have nowhere to go ...
                  1. -3
                    26 September 2020 15: 38
                    Quote: Zoldat_A
                    Again the generals are preparing for the past wars.

                    With bayonet fighting, everything is in order - they taught me and I have been trying to keep in shape for several decades.


                    This is called "preparing for the past wars."
                  2. +1
                    26 September 2020 16: 08
                    Quote: Zoldat_A
                    but they never went inside - precisely because of the mines.

                    Well, then what's the point in the low profile of the BMP, if the infantry adds another 50-70 cm from above? Moreover, the infantry is not protected in any way.
                    So it turns out that Kurganets with the fighters inside is not much higher than the BMP-2 with the fighters on top. And if the KAZ is still as promised, then the difference in height in a meter is, in principle, uncritical.
        2. SAG
          +4
          26 September 2020 12: 32
          Lynx KF31 weighing up to 38 tons, and Lynx KF41 a little more mass ... According to the Russian classification, closer to the tank ... Consider the T-55
      3. +5
        26 September 2020 08: 00
        The more futurism in the design, the more work for the tinsmiths
      4. 0
        26 September 2020 15: 17
        Quote: Dead Day
        nothing ... so futuristic in appearance. nothing more to say.

        ========
        Aha! Its height is especially "futuristic"! And the cost - and wah-a-a-a - solid "futurism" !!! wassat
    2. +11
      26 September 2020 05: 21
      About a meter longer than Bradley and about half a meter wider. They are approximately equal in height with Bradley.
      In general, the goal is so good, voluminous ...
      The main conclusions can be made after the process of work of the ATGM along with the process of burning and leaving the car by the crew is traced.
    3. +4
      26 September 2020 05: 39
      Indeed, that much of it was dusting the NATO soldiers.
    4. +1
      26 September 2020 06: 13
      Das ist Fantastisch! Ja ja! naturelich!
      It is clear that their BMP from Rheinmetall Defense is to a large extent created as a counterweight to our Kurganets-25 universal tracked platform.
    5. +13
      26 September 2020 06: 54
      Well, it's brilliant to make a commercial in the dustiest hole you can find in Europe. Probably the soldiers were cursing this drynda and the carrier sitting inside how much the light costs ...
    6. +6
      26 September 2020 07: 01
      But how is the issue of transferring to new theaters of operation resolved - on its own, by rail, by plane, by road? Too wide.
      1. +4
        26 September 2020 10: 17
        Not stuffed in Galaxy?
        Yes, you can put a number of slopes on the traler - again, the load will be painfully problematic in height ...
    7. +2
      26 September 2020 08: 10
      Yes, everything is fine. Even the blind will come from far away. Good target.
    8. +2
      26 September 2020 08: 49
      It turns out interesting. The Polish promising tank Concept PL-01 was smashed to smithereens by critics, and the German Lynx KF41 was awarded another launch into the series. And for me, the same solutions
      For comparison:

      1. +11
        26 September 2020 10: 26
        Well, you also compared: some kind of Pshek's tin can and Rheinmetall's super-dolls (even if (strictly between us! lol ), RM also did not always carve only nonubivahi)!
        The Germans have great engineering technology, and the pshek have apples with strawberry fudge ... This is a purely political question! laughing
      2. +2
        26 September 2020 13: 12
        Quote: APASUS
        But for me it's the same decisions

        It seems to me that the bottom has more chances with cross)))
      3. +2
        26 September 2020 19: 50
        It turns out interesting. The Polish promising tank Concept PL-01 was smashed to smithereens by critics, and the German Lynx KF41 was awarded another launch into the series. And for me, the same solutions

        Yes, they were taken from one computer toy, it is now fashionable in the West.
    9. +3
      26 September 2020 09: 48
      A grenade launcher's dream ...
    10. +1
      26 September 2020 12: 22
      Of course, I may be wrong about the more bells and whistles, the more difficult it is to repair in the field
    11. +1
      26 September 2020 12: 40
      Her speed is clearly not like a lynx, the Bundeswehr will not acquire, well, maybe the Poles will buy if there is enough money.
      1. 0
        26 September 2020 18: 42
        Hungarians have already ordered.
    12. +2
      26 September 2020 13: 28
      Cannon Wotan, it's time for us to create Perun ;-)
    13. +4
      26 September 2020 14: 55
      The cost is impressive !!! Approximately 850 million rubles apiece !!! This is what a rollback it was necessary to zashashlyat to buy this vyser of the German car industry.
      For comparison, t90ms costs about 200 million rubles. That is, for this trotter you can kum 4 normal tanks. And for 50 million rubles of guided missiles.
      Before that I thought that the main suckers in Evropka were Ukrainians. But no, the Hungarians hike.
      1. +1
        26 September 2020 15: 14
        They cost in euros - not rubles.
    14. -1
      26 September 2020 15: 16
      How square everything is
      Ko-ko!
      How green everything is
      Ko-ko!
      How beautiful everything is, how NATO is blue
      Co-co, co, ro, co, co !!!
      1. 0
        26 September 2020 20: 07
        not blue, but blue
    15. -2
      26 September 2020 15: 19
      Cool, they stole the Ukrainians!
    16. 0
      26 September 2020 16: 00
      much more promising BMP seems to be a bunch of BMPT and armored personnel carriers
    17. +2
      26 September 2020 17: 39
      You can, of course, poke at the height of the profile, the weight of the car and other disadvantages, but the lynx's cannon is, however, a thing, and 35 mm programmable projectiles for it, with remote detonation. And so are the mini-booms with a detachable pallet. And on our not "having analogues in the world" even 57-mm with DP is not able to cut down. Why??
      1. 0
        26 September 2020 20: 09
        not only mini arrows, but also mini tomahawks)))))))
    18. 0
      26 September 2020 18: 11
      There, along the way, the warriors weighed down all their military diapers ... from the flank the Lynx looks like Armatu ... how many military men grabbed the heart !? The cool command made a joke on the poor NATO soldiers ...
    19. 0
      26 September 2020 19: 52
      Military review went along the path of air pro?
    20. +2
      26 September 2020 22: 14
      "Bradley", with which "Lynx", apparently, is comparable in size

      In the video, as it seemed to me, the Lynx is probably bigger than Bradley.
    21. +1
      27 September 2020 18: 39
      Another futuristic-looking shit

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"