Military Review

Features of Japanese neutrality. About the Matsuoka-Molotov Pact

Features of Japanese neutrality. About the Matsuoka-Molotov Pact

Pacts in fashion

On the eve of World War II, pacts were in vogue. Perhaps the first agreement called the pact was the joint political act of Germany and Japan (Anti-Comintern), signed in November 1936. Then only the civil war broke out in Spain and the Reds raised their heads in Southeast Asia, which was considered the zone of interests of Japan.

Before that, there was still an unsuccessful attempt to form a kind of Eastern Pact on the old continent with the participation of the USSR, Germany, Czechoslovakia, Finland, Poland and the Baltic countries. And Italy joined the Anti-Comintern Pact, and Mussolini did it as if on purpose on November 7, 1937, as a gift to Stalin for the twentieth anniversary of the October Revolution.

The direction of the tripartite agreement of the Axis countries against the Comintern was even ridiculed by Stalin in a speech at the 1939th Congress of the CPSU (b) in the spring of XNUMX. The leader of the peoples clearly defined that the military bloc of Germany, Italy and Japan is directed against the interests of the United States, Britain and France. The USSR, as one could understand, only followed them, and the "centers" of the Comintern, according to Stalin, were "ridiculous to look for in the deserts of Mongolia, the mountains of Abyssinia and the wilds of Spanish Morocco" - the then hot spots.

Signing of the Triple Berlin Pact, 1940

The fact that the Anti-Comintern Pact was replaced in 1940 by the Triple Berlin Pact, already anti-American, did not change anything in essence. There were also pacts between the Russians and the French, the Germans with the Poles, and, of course, the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, regarded in Japan as a betrayal of the ideas of the Anti-Comintern Pact.

It took Hitler a lot of work in the fall of 1939 to convince the Mikado subjects that it was too early for the Japanese to leave the notorious Axis Berlin-Rome-Tokyo. But it only seemed that the solitaire relationship in the already established blocks was changing too often. Even the war with Finland, and then the annexation of the three Baltic states to the Soviet Union, did not force Washington and London to make a direct break with Moscow.

Too encouraging was the prospect that the Nazis would be seriously (albeit briefly) stuck in Russia. The pause was badly needed not only for Britain, which was barely able to withstand the threat of a German invasion, but also for the United States, where the military industry was just gaining momentum.

However, the American position depended too much on when it would be possible to convince the isolationists that it was impossible to sit out overseas even in this European war. Moreover, unlike the First World War, where still insignificant contingents of troops fought in the colonies, the second turned out to be by no means only European.

The old continent was almost completely crushed by the Hitlerites, together with Italy that joined them. Today, there is no longer any need to prove that, often demonstrating ostentatious indifference to numerous German provocations, the F.D. Roosevelt administration did everything to make the Japanese expansion in the Far East a real irritant for the general public.

But this is not more important. American business could no longer ignore the competition from the unexpectedly rising Eastern colossus. Yes, the preparation of the United States for war unfolded at full power only after the Hitlerite Wehrmacht attacked the USSR, but the Americans had to take their side in the world conflict much earlier.

In Japan, hardly anyone counted on creating a great Eastern empire without opposition from the United States. However, in order to withstand the struggle with such a power, even if it is fighting on a distant periphery, it was necessary to provide a reliable rear.

The Chinese factor was really not taken seriously in Tokyo, they hoped to tame the Kuomintangists Chiang Kai-shek, among other things, offering them "to beat the Communists together." However, just at this time, two conflicts with the new Russia occurred - a kind of reconnaissance in force. Indeed, even three or four years before that in Japan, not least at the suggestion of the press, they came to the conclusion that the Soviets were not ready to fight on distant fronts.

One of the clashes, on Lake Khasan, turned out to be local, but inflated to the scale of a small war, while the other, on the Mongolian Khalkhin Gol, on the contrary, was too serious to be carefully veiled. They actually forced Japanese politicians to change their direction at least temporarily.

Yosuke Matsuoki's Diplomatic Blitzkrieg

This was also dictated by business, the role of which in Japanese neutrality is written on the pages of the Military Review (Mystery of Japanese Neutrality). Defense orders came to entrepreneurs on an increasing basis, and for their fulfillment there was an acute shortage of resources, primarily oil.

The Yamato empire ran out of oil by the 1920s, and before the war, most of it, up to 90%, was bought from the United States. But they clearly had to be at war, and an alternative was needed. There was only one option left - in the Soviet Union, on Sakhalin.

Back in the fall of 1940, Japanese Foreign Minister Yosuke Matsuoka offered V. Molotov, at that time the head of the Soviet government, a neutrality treaty in exchange for maintaining the Sakhalin concessions. Preliminary consent was obtained, although the neutrality pact did not allow raising the question of returning South Sakhalin and the Kuriles. Then they did not belong to us.

However, the Kremlin dragged on with specifics due to the need to settle in the Baltic States and Moldova, as well as to gain a foothold on the Karelian Isthmus. At this time, Stalin planned to replace Molotov as chairman of the Council of People's Commissars, and Matsuoka, despite the fact that he could not know about it, actually had to go on a second round.

Matsuoka has not forgotten the humiliation Japan suffered two years earlier when Joachim Ribbentrop, the German foreign minister, signed a non-aggression pact with Molotov. Soviet diplomats and Stalin personally made curtsies in the direction of Germany, and did not even remember about the Japanese. The Germans simply abandoned them, leaving them without allies, when the war in the East could begin at any moment.

Matsuoka, who came to Europe especially for this, did not even stutter in Moscow about the consequences of the recent military conflicts with the Russians, having received in response a proposal to expand the non-aggression pact to the level of a neutrality pact. In fact, then the Soviet leadership had a free hand, and the Japanese minister, according to V. Molotov, his assertiveness cost a lot.

Yosuke Matsuoka signs a pact of neutrality with the USSR in the Kremlin

Many years later, the Soviet People's Commissar recalled: “This farewell was worth the fact that Japan did not fight with us. Matsuoka later paid for this visit to us ... "Molotov, of course, had in mind the famous arrival at the Yaroslavl station to the train of the imperial minister of Stalin himself, who, in front of the German ambassador Schulenburg, was demonstratively kind to Matsuoka, saying to him:" You are Asian and I am Asian ... If we are together, all the problems of Asia can be solved. "

The main thing was in Article 2 of the signed pact:

In the event that one of the contracting parties is the subject of hostilities on the part of one or more third powers, the other contracting party will remain neutral throughout the conflict.

Strange neutrality

The reaction of Japan's allies to the pact with the Soviets was by no means positive: they were losing an ally in the upcoming battle with them. Hitler was simply furious, saying that he was not going to fight the United States instead of the Japanese. Although, in fact, he did just that, trying in vain to play the card of American isolationism.

After Moscow, Matsuoka visited the Axis allies in Berlin and Rome, where he did not hide his great friendliness and respect for the United States. But even from Mussolini, he was forced to listen to demands for Japan to take a firmer anti-American position.

The United States reacted no less original to the Soviet-Japanese agreements. The Matsuoka-Molotov Pact was immediately called a strange neutrality in the American press. The Kremlin was reminded not only of the recent clashes with Japan, but also was not allowed to forget about the anti-Comintern pact, support for the Kuomintang regime, and along with Chiang Kai-shek, the Chinese communists who were slowly but surely gaining points.

At that time, Washington had not yet planned to provide direct assistance to Red Russia, although they warned its leader as best they could about the reality of the German threat. But this will happen very soon, but for now they have rather soberly interpreted the agreements with the Japanese as an attempt by Moscow to avoid being stabbed in the back.

Moreover, in addition to the Japanese, the offensive from the rear of Stalin's Russia could be threatened by the Turks and even the Iranians. The latter, as the almost bloodless occupation of Persia by British and Soviet troops in the summer of 1941 showed, was not worth fearing at all, but the Turks, it seems, have not forgotten Soviet aid and support in the early 20s for twenty years. And with Hitler, the heirs of Mustafa Kemal simply did not bargain, because they wanted too much, right up to the revival of the Ottoman Empire.

Obviously, if a "strange war" happened, then "strange neutrality" had to be taken for granted. But if the strange war ended as soon as Hitler untied his hands for an offensive on the Western Front, then the strange neutrality dragged on, since it was beneficial to both Japan and the USSR.

The strange neutrality did not prevent the Soviet Union from receiving aid from the direct opponents of Japan. At the same time, oil from Sakhalin almost until the last days of the war came to the Land of the Rising Sun. Interestingly, the Japanese themselves offered to break the oil concessions so that "neutrality" would not be so strange.

But the solution to this issue was delayed until 1944 due to the fact that Germany attacked the USSR. But even before the end of the war, the parties agreed on an additional protocol to the "Pact of Neutrality", according to which Japanese oil and coal concessions were transferred to the ownership of the USSR.

The main reason for this change lay on the surface - the Mikado government no longer had the opportunity to drag out the process even further, since the Japanese Navy could no longer ensure the safe transportation of oil produced in Sakhalin to the archipelago. The American navy has already closed all possible routes that seem so short only on the map.

Well, Berlin's repeated demands later expressed to the Japanese simply to unleash a war against the USSR would mean inevitable defeat for the Far Eastern ally. However, there were also those among the Japanese who considered the attack on Pearl Harbor, which marked the beginning of the war with the United States, suicidal. And after Stalingrad, the performance of the Japanese could hardly have given the Germans anything.

From a military point of view, Moscow had to proceed from the fact that it only needed to hold out for some time against a possible Japanese aggression, and to decide the matter after the arrival of reinforcements from the western part of the country. Is it because at a conference in Tehran at the end of 1943, Stalin made it clear to Roosevelt and Churchill that Russia was not going to evade the fulfillment of its allied obligations.

This was hardly worth considering as a response to the firm decision of the United States and Great Britain to open a Second Front in Europe. Only on November 6, 1944, on the eve of the next anniversary of the Great October Revolution, when France was already practically liberated, did Stalin go to a direct violation of Soviet-Japanese neutrality.

He directly named Japan among the aggressive states, which will inevitably be defeated. In Tokyo, they understood everything correctly, reprinted the speech of the Soviet leader almost without cuts, thereby proceeding with the psychological preparation of the population for the inevitable. There was even a certainty among Soviet diplomats that the Japanese would soon leave Germany as an ally, but the Allies managed to deal with the Nazis six months earlier than with the Yamato Empire.
Photos used:,,,,
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. apro
    apro 26 September 2020 05: 13
    The treaty as a treaty ... nothing new. Is objectively beneficial to both parties. For various reasons. In a big game. Where the stakes are high. There is no place for illusions. Only calculation. Japan solved its problems. Not at the expense of the USSR. changed and the contract was not easily renewed ...
    1. Siberian54
      Siberian54 26 September 2020 14: 02
      The pact, because the "secret" articles In the Japanese-Soviet there was a mine, one of the articles said: in the event of aggression by one of the parties against the third, the contract is considered null and void .. It was necessary, this article was applied ..
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. antivirus
    antivirus 26 September 2020 07: 14
    how everything started--
    Oh, if you only knew from what rubbish poetry grows without knowing shame ..
    from what nasty beautiful words of diplomats grow about peace and friendship of peoples ... and prosperity and further see the editorials of the State Department, etc.
  4. parusnik
    parusnik 26 September 2020 07: 23
    At the same time, oil from Sakhalin almost until the last days of the war came to the Land of the Rising Sun.

  5. Olgovich
    Olgovich 26 September 2020 07: 29
    Stalin went to a direct violation of Soviet-Japanese neutrality

    What nonsense: did the Pact oblige the USSR support Japanese aggression against half the world? belay

    With its aggression, Japan has placed itself outside the law and treaties.
  6. Operator
    Operator 26 September 2020 11: 20
    99% of oil during WWII was produced by Japan in occupied Indonesia, so production on Sakhalin (~ 0,5%) did not play any role.

    Oh, and sho this happened on November 6, 1944, which violated the neutrality / innocence of chaste Japan - is it possible that Stalin's opinion about the aggressiveness of the Japanese was published in the Soviet press? And in which such clause of the agreement (as the word pactum is translated into Russian) on the neutrality of 1941 was the ban on public statements about the nature of the foreign policy of the parties to the agreement spelled out?

    From pulling the owl on the globe, it becomes clear that the numerous facts of the sinking of Soviet civil ships during WWII and the internment of their crews by the Japanese navy do not bother the authors of the article at all - well, just think, the highly neutral Japanese killed and maimed n-th number of "quilted jackets" - Russian women of the new give birth, and now there is already a whole aggressive newspaper article - you need to understand am
    1. parusnik
      parusnik 26 September 2020 11: 34
      Yeah ... poor, small, not aggressive Japan, a victim of the USSR ... laughing
      1. peter1v
        peter1v 26 September 2020 18: 38
        No matter how you relate to the general leadership talents of G.K. Zhukov, but at Khalkin-Gol, he clearly showed the Japanese that the Red Army, if necessary, would erase them into powder, regardless of losses. And this - disregarding the losses, made the Japons very sensible. And they were already afraid to fight with us.
    2. podymych
      28 September 2020 12: 50
      Dear colleague, the remark is absolutely fair, but after all, this 0,5% held the "Northern Territories" - that is, half of Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, and even the Kwantung Army got some of it. Indonesian fuel was completely burned out by the metropolis, army, aviation and navy of Mikado.
      Well, let's not forget the prospect - it's not just that the Yapas clung to and cling to the SevTERRitorii so much, although ... after all, there is so much else, right up to RENIUM
      1. Operator
        Operator 28 September 2020 13: 00
        There is indeed a lot of rhenium at the bottom near the Lesser Kuril Ridge, but even more of it is at the bottom near the ridge of the Japanese islands of volcanic origin.
        1. podymych
          28 September 2020 13: 09
          Yes, and the disgusting feeling does not leave that, alas, the Japanese will take it seriously much earlier than we do ... But we will all complain at a distance
  7. Undecim
    Undecim 26 September 2020 11: 24
    The Yamato empire ran out of oil by the 1920s, and before the war, most of it, up to 90%, was bought from the United States. But they clearly had to be at war, and an alternative was needed. There was only one option left - in the Soviet Union, on Sakhalin.
    Another fantasy from the authors.

    For information - the consumption of oil by Japan in 1942 - 35 barrels or 900 tons.
    Therefore, at the expense of Sakhalin oil, even if we assume that production could be kept at the maximum level of 1933, Japan could cover as much as 0,5% of its demand. In reality, the Sakhalin oil in the Japanese balance sheet was vanishingly small.
    The only place where Japan could get oil in sufficient quantities for the economy is the Dutch East Indies.
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 28 September 2020 13: 11
      Quote: Undecim
      Therefore, at the expense of Sakhalin oil, even if we assume that production could be kept at the maximum level of 1933, Japan could cover as much as 0,5% of its demand.

      Or 20 days of fueling IJN. smile
      If we take all the production in Northern Sakhalin, including the Soviet areas, then in a year you can barely scrape together fuel for 3,5 months of IJN consumption.
  8. K-50
    K-50 27 September 2020 08: 03
    Unfortunately, the existence of such pacts and allied relations (with America) did not in any way prevent the Japanese and Americans from shelling or sinking our civilian ships in the Far East. sad
  9. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  10. iouris
    iouris 28 September 2020 12: 46
    It is time to stop casting a shadow over the fence of the USSR. The Kwantung Army was defeated by the joint decision of the victorious powers that created a new world order following the results of the world war against the Axis powers.
  11. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 28 September 2020 13: 06
    Yes, the preparation of the United States for war unfolded at full power only after the Nazi Wehrmacht attacked the USSR,

    Didn't know that the Wehrmacht attacked the USSR in 1939. smile
    The preparation of the United States for war unfolded in 1939, when the FDR pushed through the creation of a normal army to replace the peacetime ground forces, in which there were only three calculated divisions and half of which were coastal defense.
    But it took US industry three years to get on a war footing. And even more - if we consider that the preparation of the US shipbuilding industry for a future war began in 1937.
    There was only one option left - in the Soviet Union, on Sakhalin.

    Seriously? Over 18 years of Japanese oil production in Soviet Sakhalin, about 2 million tons of oil were produced. Maximum annual production - 200 tons of oil... This is one and a half times less than monthly IJN need.
    Even if you add all the Soviet Sakhalin fields, the balance will not improve. The Soviet trust Sakhalinneft produced almost 4 million tons of oil in 3 years of the war. That is, according to 750 tons per year. Or three month IJN consumption without active hostilities.
    The overall Japan's annual demand for oil is at least 5 million tons in peacetime.
    At the same time, oil from Sakhalin almost until the last days of the war came to the Land of the Rising Sun.

    Officially, the Japanese oil and coal concessions in Northern Sakhalin were liquidated on March 30, 1944.
    In fact, liquidation began in 1939, when oil production first fell to 57 thousand tons per year, and in 1942 - to 17 thousand tons.
    1. podymych
      28 September 2020 13: 18
      Sorry, but even American sources admit that from 1939 to 1941. there was no "full power" to deploy military production in the United States. Stettinius called this time the infancy of the American military-industrial complex.
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 28 September 2020 13: 41
        Quote: podymych
        Sorry, but even American sources admit that from 1939 to 1941. there was no "full power" to deploy military production in the United States. Stettinius called this time the infancy of the American military-industrial complex.

        It's just that the military-industrial complex has traditionally lagged behind in development of the army and naval plans of preparation for war. The military began preparing for war much earlier. By December 1941, the ground forces managed to increase the number of divisions seventeen times in comparison with 1939, the Navy did not lag behind - by the end of 1940, USN had ordered more than a hundred Fletchers and three dozen Bensons. Plus three dozen Clevelands (until December 1941).
        Military production, which also worked in parallel for Britain, simply did not have time to increase output in order to fulfill all orders of the military department.