Ukraine intends to build two new power units of the Khmelnitsky NPP

98
Ukraine intends to build two new power units of the Khmelnitsky NPP

Ukraine intends to build the third and fourth power units of the Khmelnytsky nuclear power plant. This is stated in the decree of the President of the country, Volodymyr Zelensky, according to Ukrainian media.

Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy instructed the Cabinet of Ministers to submit to the Verkhovna Rada a bill providing for the design and construction of two new power units at the Khmelnitsky NPP. The government has been given two months to develop a new document.



In addition, the Ukrainian government should develop a long-term program for the development of nuclear energy within the framework of the "energy strategy of Ukraine" for the period up to 2035. Also, the Cabinet should take appropriate measures to pay off existing debts to electricity producers.

Ukraine's desire to build two new power units of the Khmelnytsky nuclear power plant was announced back in 2018, at the same time a feasibility study was approved for construction. Within the framework of the project, it was planned to install two nuclear reactors produced by "well-known manufacturers", except for the "aggressor country". It is planned to install Skoda JS as reactors

Khmelnitsky NPP is located in the city of Netishin, Khmelnitsky region of Ukraine. KhNPP includes two VVER-1000 power units with a total capacity of 2000 MW, launched in 1987 and 2004, respectively. The main purpose of the station is to cover the shortage of electrical power in the western region of Ukraine, while in August 2019 the second power unit of the KhNPP was transferred to the power system of Poland as part of the "integration of the energy systems of Ukraine and the EU."

It should be noted that currently there are four nuclear power plants in the nuclear industry of Ukraine - Khmelnytsky, Rivne, South-Ukrainian and Zaporozhye, in total there are 15 power units on them. The share of nuclear energy in the country's energy balance is about 55%.
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    23 September 2020 12: 24
    How did they get together with such "terrible and dirty energy" in the EU? The prospects for the nuclear power industry in the EU today are described as "not rosy".
    1. +11
      23 September 2020 12: 31
      the Ukrainian government should develop a long-term program for the development of nuclear energy within the framework of the "energy strategy of Ukraine" for the period up to 2035.

      These are lads, already economic and economic activity, which is incompatible with jumping, shooting ... No.
      1. +3
        23 September 2020 13: 19
        and you need a lot of money ... Gena hi
        1. 0
          25 September 2020 22: 58
          Quote: novel xnumx
          and you need a lot of money ...

          to the point! good not like a goof Yaytsenyukh with his wall. Ze widely, on a large scale, decided to tyrit! bully
    2. +4
      23 September 2020 12: 32
      It seems to me that the EU energy strategy is to drag the stations further to the periphery.
      1. +3
        23 September 2020 12: 51
        Americans also benefit from the wind rose. In case of war, Russia will not touch it, but they can do anything. They are zhakhut at nuclear power plants near the borders of Russia by some radical green fanatic under the guise of a technogen and will carry the cyclone graphite muck, clearly not in the direction of Washington.
        1. +1
          23 September 2020 14: 00
          Quote: g1washntwn
          Americans also benefit from the wind rose. In case of war, Russia will not touch it, but they can do anything. They are zhakhut at nuclear power plants near the borders of Russia by some radical green fanatic under the guise of a technogen and will carry the cyclone graphite muck, clearly not in the direction of Washington.
          Not towards Washington, yes. But not quite in the direction of Russia - along the wind rose. Rather, it will feed the entire Western Ukraine with radioactive filth. And at the same time the Rivne and Volyn regions and Warsaw. It's a pity Kaliningrad will get it too.
          1. +2
            23 September 2020 14: 11
            They won't be able to attack, I agree. But the plans of the Americans to stop the Russian offensive in Europe by zones of strong radio-biological contamination will not be removed from the Pentagon shelf for long.
        2. +3
          23 September 2020 15: 54
          Westinghouse does not have graphite, and in general, in the water-to-water reactors, which are now relevant, forget about RBMK, the latter remained in Kursk, Smolensk and St. Petersburg and are gradually being decommissioned. There will be no such effect from the martyr, only the nearby territory will be clogged, which is monopenisual for us.
          1. +1
            24 September 2020 08: 50
            I will write down the golden words "monopenisual")
          2. 0
            24 September 2020 17: 11
            Quote: MaikCG
            Westinghouse does not have graphite, and in general, in the water-to-water reactors, which are now relevant, forget about RBMK, the latter remained in Kursk, Smolensk and St. Petersburg and are gradually being decommissioned. There will be no such effect from the martyr, only the nearby territory will be clogged, which is monopenisual for us.

            Skoda reactors on our fuel seem to be at the Kalinin NPP there is their reactor, made for the Bulgarian Belena
            1. 0
              25 September 2020 14: 33
              The Czechs did, but also VVER.
        3. 0
          24 September 2020 08: 49
          No one builds graphite blocks. Nothing will be carried there. The question here is who will buy fuel from and who will accept the spent fuel.
          1. 0
            25 September 2020 14: 35
            There is a burial ground for the waste in Chernobyl, Westinghouse does not accept its waste.
      2. +3
        23 September 2020 13: 06
        Quote: evgen1221
        It seems to me that the EU energy strategy is to drag the stations further to the periphery.

        How to say. For example, at one time, Lithuania was actually given an ultimatum - if you want to join the EU, then close the Ingalinskaya NPP. And those "with their pants up" rushed to run into this trap. As a result, the station was closed, which fully provided Lithuania and could still supply Poland, Latvia, Kaliningrad, Belarus with surpluses. Now its own generation meets the country's needs up to a maximum of 30%. Something similar happened with Belene and Kozloduy in Bulgaria.
        And Ukraine is no longer going to the EU? Or is Ze hoping for the protection of the owners? Or in general, there is a large razvodilovo- first rake Svidomo's grandmother for a construction site, and then, before joining the EU, will be forced to close the station?
        1. +22
          23 September 2020 13: 21
          Quote: LIONnvrsk
          first they will rake Svidomo's grandmother for a construction site, and then before joining the EU they will force to close the station?

          Yes, calm down. Nobody will build anything in Ukraine. To build something, it's not about Svidomo. They can only sell and destroy. What kind of power units, be afraid of God. They have been in Odessa for a year, they could not remove a rusty trough with fuel oil on the central beach, for lack of funds and opportunities. And then build. Fairy tales as they are. Moreover, for domestic consumption. Let the bridges in Zaporozhye be completed. Damn builders.
          1. +4
            23 September 2020 14: 26
            Quote: orionvitt
            Yes calm down.

            Actually, I was not nervous. Even fun! smile
        2. -3
          23 September 2020 19: 51
          Something similar happened with Belene and Kozloduy in Bulgaria.


          Belene has not yet been built at all - they hurried to close it. Kozloduy closed 4 blocks VVR 440 since 1974 and around birth. 2 VVR 1000 are in operation.

          The question is - until what year did you have to keep them open or is it important for you to pull fables? Ignalina the same old stuff was ...
          The second question is how many VVR 440s has Russia taken out of service?
          Third - which owner made you take them out?

          And at the final - for the closure of 4 blocks, Kozloduy received about 1,5 billion euros from the EU. And he will receive money until 2027. In fact, the disposal / deactivation of old blocks is free for us. The deal with the EU is excellent.
      3. 0
        23 September 2020 18: 10
        Quote: evgen1221
        It seems to me that the EU energy strategy is to drag the stations further to the periphery.

        What - together with France? wink
      4. +2
        23 September 2020 19: 00
        Quote: evgen1221
        The EU energy strategy is to drag stations further to the periphery.

        That's why they ordered the Ignalina NPP to be dismantled ... laughing The EU does not want anyone to violate the price policy in the energy sector of the European Union with their cheap energy. A condition for Ukraine's accession to the EU will be called the reduction of nuclear power plants, even those that have already been built, and not just to reconcile with the new one.
    3. +3
      23 September 2020 13: 15
      The prospects are exactly the same in Ukraine, recently, the blocks extinguished Akhmetov's green energy had nowhere to sell, and they were going to build new ones ... it's funny just)) and it's doubly funnier that the super duper democratic blocks Skoda JS, like the whole company, are wholly owned by Rosatom
    4. +3
      23 September 2020 13: 37
      Nobody was going anywhere))) another fairy tale for suckers. The cost of two power units? All questions disappear
      1. +5
        23 September 2020 14: 54
        It's just a mega saw. fellow Since the only company building blocks for reasonable time and money is Russian, either the French or the Westinghouse will be building. And they never met either the deadline or the budget. They will be able to milk Ukraine for 20 years. And from Ukraine all the money will go to pay bills. Let them build them - they will spend less money on the military-industrial complex, weapons and improving the living standards of the population. They need to close 10 out of 15 old power units for food, and this is also a lot of money. In general, let them spend. good
        1. +2
          23 September 2020 17: 40
          Do you think they will work on credit?))) Banderlog's nonsense has already become the talk of the town))) no one will do anything without prepayment. And she won't. This is another show-off, a preza, which is not a sucker, for suckers))) local elections are on the nose and the Zelebobiks have a situation - "seams".
    5. +2
      23 September 2020 14: 13
      Quote: g1washntwn
      The prospects for the nuclear power industry in the EU today are described as "not bright".

      "Rainbow" - in Europe it is laughing not much more
    6. +1
      23 September 2020 16: 20
      Quote: g1washntwn
      How did they get together with such "terrible and dirty energy" in the EU? The prospects for the nuclear power industry in the EU today are described as "not rosy".

      Europe is going to pump hydrogen energy in the future. Nuclear power plants can be used to electrolyze water and trade the resulting hydrogen. It is already being experimentally injected in small quantities in parallel with natural gas into the gas network.
  2. +8
    23 September 2020 12: 25
    Strange dill they have no energy strategy, and they grab onto the construction of multimillion-dollar projects in the energy sector ... request It seems to me alone that someone put the cart in front of the horse?
    1. +7
      23 September 2020 12: 45
      Quote: Alex2048
      did someone put the cart in front of the horse?

      Moreover, they themselves run ahead of the cart. This is such a strange disposition for an "economic leap forward".
      And if without laughter, then there are no other options, there is no state support from the state to support "green energy", the shale revolution is canceled, to carry it from afar - the toad on the neck has already pressed down on the carotid artery once, constant supplies will drive the economy into a coffin. In general, as in a cartoon: "Planet Shelezyak. There are no minerals, no water, no vegetation. Inhabited by robots."(c). Underdismunized is the only thing that will not let the pants fall off tomorrow. For the sake of their goals, the EU will modestly avert their eyes, this will also be correct and democratic, not like the Belarusian NPP.
    2. +2
      23 September 2020 13: 52
      Multimillion dollar? If Gayropeans or mattress mats are built, the price will be billions. And not alone. Attention the question - who will give money to the horned raguli?))))
      1. -2
        23 September 2020 19: 59
        If Gayropeans or mattress mats are built, the price will be billions. And not alone.


        And if Rosatom will not build billions!?!? Did you eat some whites or what? Rosatom's price for Belene was more than 10 billion euros.

        You have an intelligence like an electronic calculator, made in the eighties .... I sings on "you". Probably you won't understand the difference.
        1. +3
          23 September 2020 20: 55
          And if Rosatom will not build billions!?!? Did you eat some whites or what? Rosatom's price for Belene was more than 10 billion euros.
          Calm down, our belligerent Bulgarian friend, something you are too aggressive nowadays.
          There is no need to bend here about 10 billion of Rosatom, there was no such figure, the price for the 2000s - 2010s increased from 4 to only 8 billion - and what did you want - inflation, costs ...> 10 billion? - This is an estimate of the project cost by HSBC, which your cunning government hired to audit in order to bring down the price.
          The United States, represented by Westinghouse, wanted to lick loyally, but it turned out like that - and the nuclear power plant was not built, and the Russians had to pay the forfeit. crying
          And, in general, - will you argue with the fact that Rosatom builds nuclear power plants cheaper than competitors?
          1. 0
            23 September 2020 21: 02
            You will argue with the fact that Rosatom builds nuclear power plants cheaper


            Dear, what I wanted to argue about, I described in a post. Sorry, but the urapatreots pissed me off for the most ...
            And whether it's cheaper or not is pointless to say without having a detailed estimate on hand, so that the infrastructure is different.

            But if we bought gas from you at 240+ and then dropped to 125 and then bought amersky gas at 60+, then I can quite imagine that your AES will be "cheaper" by the same principle. Not so impossible.
            1. +1
              23 September 2020 21: 32
              Dear, what I wanted to argue about, I described in a post.

              In your post, first of all, you messed up with numbers.
              Gas was bought at such prices - and what do you want - market request Found cheaper - well done.
              Only this does not apply to nuclear energy. Tell me, are the same Americans building a lot now? And Rosatom has a bunch of real projects that are being implemented.
              Bulgaria, having refused normal cooperation with Rosatom, was left without a station, but with an unnecessary reactor, and even paid money. Good business.
              The deal with the EU is excellent.
              Yes Yes...
            2. 0
              23 September 2020 21: 39
              Dear, where did you find hurray-patriots? I live in Ukraine, I was born and raised, and have lived all my life. So moderate your ardor)))
            3. +1
              23 September 2020 22: 52
              hi

              Quote: Keyser Soze
              You will argue with the fact that Rosatom builds nuclear power plants cheaper

              But if we bought gas from you at 240+ and then dropped to 125 and then bought amersky gas at 60+, then I can quite imagine that your AES will be "cheaper" by the same principle. Not so impossible.


              You know, from the outside, it looks like a monologue of a famous comedian about blue ones, yesterday for 3 rubles, and today for 5, but Vot are such ...
              Without the Graph of the dynamics of gas prices, in an unspecified time period, discuss this your example even funnier than discussing the difference in the cost of power units without the customer's technical specifications and technical specifications.
        2. +2
          23 September 2020 21: 37
          You guys, continue to "shatter" on NATO and the EU, they will "charge" you even not such prices)))
  3. +1
    23 September 2020 12: 27
    "Ukraine intends to build two new power units of the Khmelnitsky NPP"... Well, go for it. Well, we'll see. After all, electricity for the EU should be cheap.
    1. -4
      23 September 2020 12: 31
      I am more surprised that they chose German-American design. Not French, at least. Or pennies not measured?
      1. +4
        23 September 2020 12: 51
        I'm more surprised that they chose German-American design

        It is planned to install Skoda JS as reactors

        What other German-American then?
        For almost forty years, ŠKODA JS as has been working in the field of VVER technology, during this time 21 sets of VVER / V-213 type reactors and three sets of VVER-1000 / V-320 type reactors have been produced, including drives for regulating bodies
      2. +4
        23 September 2020 13: 35
        Quote: K-612-O
        I'm more surprised that they chose German-American design

        Nope, free and independent Ukraine chose totalitarian Mordorian design... Because ŠKODA JS as is part of the OMZ group. smile
        1. 0
          23 September 2020 14: 07
          Quote: Alexey RA
          ŠKODA JS as is part of the OMZ group

          What is interesting OMZ belongs to ... Gazprombank
          1. +1
            23 September 2020 18: 13
            Quote: user1212
            What is interesting OMZ belongs to ... Gazprombank

            Predatory tentacles of Gazprom entangled Europe
            © someone from Europoliticians
    2. +1
      23 September 2020 13: 23
      Quote: Ash Poseidon
      "Ukraine intends to build two new power units of the Khmelnitsky NPP"... Well, go for it. Well, we'll see. After all, electricity for the EU should be cheap.

      As I understand it, they will build a Westinghouse, take a shitty project like Fukushima and screw it up, in debt, so that everyone could steal - both the American owners and their 404 serfs.
      and do not care this EU with its "green" eco-policy. It is the Germans and the Lithuanians who cannot build a nuclear power plant.
      And the French, for example, can be in full height. So it goes.
  4. +3
    23 September 2020 12: 27
    What about "Ukraine tse Europe"? Nuclear power plants are being liquidated there, windmills are being built ...
    Does the owner know? What if he forbids?
    1. +5
      23 September 2020 12: 34
      The owner of the puppy is on another continent.
      He doesn't give a damn about any problems in Europe.
      The owner has already approved the NPP.
      After all, it is the states that are now supplying fuel for the ruined reactors.
      What quality and whether this is the twenty-second question.
      1. +6
        23 September 2020 12: 38
        Indeed, the owner is not in Europe, I confused sad
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -1
      24 September 2020 01: 04
      Quote: unhappy
      What about "Ukraine tse Europe"? Nuclear power plants are being liquidated there, windmills are being built ...
      Does the owner know? What if he forbids?

      In the EU, Uraina will be taken only after the population in it has decreased by another 50%, and half of them will be Turks. I wouldn't be surprised if it gets renamed over time.
  5. +1
    23 September 2020 12: 34
    And what will they repair the existing ones for? And what to do with the detention? -There is a gas station in the country, after all.
    1. +3
      23 September 2020 13: 29
      Quote: evgen1221
      And what will they repair the existing ones? And where to put the detention
      You don't know very well, Svidomo. They don't bother with such questions. First, the "business" is done, and then it is thought. However, "I think" I got excited. The place they think you can't think of much. I am absolutely not worried about some "new power units", because all this is cheap Ukrainian chatter. I am more worried about the old power units, this is serious.
      1. +2
        23 September 2020 14: 09
        Quote: orionvitt
        I am more worried about the old power units, this is serious.

        The Nezalezhnaya Nazis already said two or three years ago that, in the event of the occupation of Ukraine by Russia, Ukraine has 15 high-yield atomic bombs - by the number of operating power units.

        On that day, I realized that the concepts of "Ukraine" and "thinking with your head" are absolutely incompatible. fool
      2. 0
        23 September 2020 15: 49
        Quote: orionvitt
        Quote: evgen1221
        And what will they repair the existing ones? And where to put the detention
        You don't know very well, Svidomo. They don't bother with such questions. First, the "business" is done, and then it is thought. However, "I think" I got excited. The place they think you can't think of much. I am absolutely not worried about some "new power units", because all this is cheap Ukrainian chatter. I am more worried about the old power units, this is serious.

        Why not think? He even thinks about his pocket.
        It looks like Zelya has found a way to "make money" on a large scale. Or curators found him.
        Judge for yourself:
        1. President, there is a mace. The right ass licks regularly. A "beggar" in comparison even with Timoshenko.
        2. We must reward.
        But as?
        While he was working as a clown and hiding from being drafted into the ATO zone, other nimble ones took everything apart.
        Zukerki and the military at Parashenka, metallurgy and all that at Akhmetov's and this ... wherever you go - everywhere is Avakov, then some Kolomoisky.
        And try to touch, they have battalions of natsyks ... schA will go and tear and say, sho and bulo.
        Where to go to the poor clown?
        And no one has reached the nuclear power industry. EUREKA!!! And the pocket will be full and no one has crossed the road.
        This is how it is "thought" in 404. The rest is our army. The strategy can be developed and approved even before 2200, but you want to eat now and the presidential term will end soon. On vacation, you have to fly to Turkey, and not to the Maldives ... Zhinka is offended by the tse ...
        1. 0
          24 September 2020 17: 32
          Quote: Halpat
          And no one has reached the nuclear power industry. EUREKA!!! And the pocket will be full and no one has crossed the road.

          SBU investigates scandal at Energoatom. The enterprise suffered losses in the amount of $ 10 million. At least this could lead to the dismissal of the president ... ... As you know, the head of Energoatom, Yuri Nedashkovsky, has long been a friend of the head of the Fuel and Energy Complex of the Verkhovna Rada, Nikolai Martynenko, who accounts for even more, than the other prime minister Yatsenyuk. They are connected by a dense common political activity

          Many people are trying to clean up Ukrainian energy
    2. +1
      23 September 2020 18: 17
      Quote: evgen1221
      And what will they repair the existing ones for?

      In August last year, it was at this nuclear power plant at Unit 1 that the generator was put out of action when starting up after repair - repair after repair ...
  6. 0
    23 September 2020 12: 34
    And what, Ukraine has the finances for the construction of a nuclear power plant? Or an option as we build Turkey?
    1. -1
      23 September 2020 12: 44
      Europe will build for its own needs, but not on its own, but on someone else's territory, whose people they do not feel sorry for at all in case of something ...
      1. 0
        23 September 2020 13: 15
        Quote: Elephant
        Europe will build for its own needs, but not on its own, but on someone else's territory, whose people they do not feel sorry for at all in case of something ...

        Well, it depends on where and where the wind will blow. Europe is not Antarctica. There, the population density is such that no one, in which case, will not seem a little.
        1. +1
          23 September 2020 14: 12
          Quote: Piramidon
          Well, it depends on where and where the wind will blow. Europe is not Antarctica. There, the population density is such that no one, in which case, will not seem a little.

          I posted a map with a wind rose just above in the comments. All of Western Ukraine with Warsaw in the company will take a sip of radioactive rain in full. Kaliningrad, unfortunately, too.
  7. nnm
    +2
    23 September 2020 12: 34
    Strange desire. Too lazy to look at the energy balance of the square, but something tells me that they do not have a generation deficit due to a drop in production and an increase in tariffs. Then, it turns out that this is just populism before the local elections.
    1. -1
      23 September 2020 12: 40
      Quote: nnm
      that they do not have a generation deficit due to falling production and rising tariffs. Then, it turns out that this is just populism before the local elections.

      Maybe Europe will get not only cheap labor, but also "clean" electricity ...
      1. nnm
        0
        23 September 2020 12: 45
        No, it doesn't work that way. "Clean" electricity is a huge problem for the country's energy system, especially for its export.
        1. -3
          23 September 2020 12: 47
          Quote: nnm
          No, it doesn't work that way. "Clean" electricity is a huge problem for the country's energy system, especially for its export.

          How does it not work? Will it be impossible to drive electricity to Europe? Or Europe will not be able to accept?
          1. nnm
            0
            23 September 2020 12: 53
            If by "clean" you mean windmills, solar - then no, Ukraine will not be able to do it. Technically and organizationally difficult.
            1. -1
              23 September 2020 12: 55
              Quote: nnm
              If by "clean" you mean windmills, solar - then no, Ukraine will not be able to do it.

              No, not like that. Ukraine is building reactors and electricity to Europe. For Europe, the energy seems to be "clean" because it is bought on the side ..
              1. nnm
                -2
                23 September 2020 12: 56
                Got your idea))) Then, yes)))
                1. +1
                  23 September 2020 13: 00
                  It's just that in Europe with "cleanliness" it is often like this. Dirty work on production is done in China, and in Europe, environmentally friendly electric transport ... And since Greta is pressing, and without electricity, neither here nor there ... and here the neighbor is a beggar why not use it?
                  1. +1
                    23 September 2020 13: 33
                    Quote: mat-vey
                    It's just that in Europe with "cleanliness" this is often the case. Dirty work on production is done in China, and in Europe, environmentally friendly electric transport ..

                    Yeah, clean electricity for which is generated directly from the outlet. smile
                    1. -1
                      23 September 2020 13: 42
                      Quote: Alexey RA
                      Yeah, clean electricity for which is generated directly from the outlet.

                      What's wrong? Waste in another country, not even in the EEC, means everything is clean ...
                      1. +1
                        23 September 2020 13: 46
                        Quote: mat-vey
                        What's wrong? Waste in another country, not even in the EEC, means everything is clean ...

                        Yeah. And when pollution from abroad reaches the EU, the environmentalists will no longer see this. smile
                      2. -2
                        23 September 2020 13: 48
                        Quote: Alexey RA
                        Yeah. And when pollution from abroad reaches the EU

                        Was it different once?
                      3. +1
                        23 September 2020 13: 53
                        Quote: mat-vey
                        Was it different once?

                        Spawn this did not happen, and again the same. © smile
                      4. -1
                        23 September 2020 13: 57
                        There are traditions that have been tested by time ... why retreat? Waste of chemistry, nuclear ones were shoved all over the world and it doesn't matter that the Earth is round - when it will still be, and now it is cheaper and more profitable ..
    2. -1
      23 September 2020 12: 46
      There is also a more mundane option - the new blocks (or even the entire AES) will be private and, to please the owners, the government will close a couple of state-owned stations running on Russian fuel. And the energy balance ... will be adjusted to the capacity of a private trader. "640 kb should be enough for everyone" (c).
      1. nnm
        +1
        23 September 2020 12: 54
        I think that it will not go further than laundering on research, project and construction
    3. 0
      23 September 2020 12: 49
      Quote: nnm
      Too lazy to look at the energy balance of the square, but something tells me that they have no shortage of generation due to a drop in production and an increase in tariffs.

      Tyuyu, right now Trump will stop the construction of the SP-2, and they will hurry up and then the Germans will have cheap e-mail. supply energy!
      Tse strategic thought of Pan Ze! wassat
      1. +1
        23 September 2020 14: 42
        Quote: Dym71
        Tyuyu, right now Trump will stop the construction of the SP-2, and they will hurry up and then the Germans will have cheap e-mail. supply energy!
        Tse strategic thought of Pan Ze!

        Sadness for Ukraine - Pan Ze planned, but Trump hardly thinks the same way. Trump plans to cram expensive gas into Europe, and Europe knows how to generate electricity. I am sure that when planning the stop of SP-2, he was not the last to think about Ukraine. He AT ALL did not think about it.

        In the plans of military provocation against Russia, Ukraine is present as a springboard and target for a retaliatory strike. And in the plans to divide the loot in Europe - no.
        1. -2
          23 September 2020 14: 49
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          and Europe knows how to generate without skakuas.

          No doubt, the question of cost.
          1. 0
            23 September 2020 15: 33
            Quote: Dym71
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            and Europe knows how to generate without skakuas.

            No doubt, the question of cost.

            Yes, the Americans were spitting saliva on the European cost. It is good to drive Westinghouse TVELs, of course, but this is a one-time business. But to put Europe on American gas is a much more ambitious task in terms of money and, moreover, a long-term one. So, it seems to me, there are definitely no Ukrainian nuclear power plants in the American plans.
        2. +1
          24 September 2020 17: 37
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Sadness for Ukraine - Pan Ze planned, but Trump hardly thinks the same way. Trump plans to cram expensive gas into Europe, and Europe knows how to generate electricity. I am sure that when planning the stop of SP-2, he was not the last to think about Ukraine. He AT ALL did not think about it.

          Yeah, buy gas in Ust-Luga and load it in Poland with a 100% margin, it's not to drive across the Atlantic)))
    4. +1
      23 September 2020 14: 51
      There is no fall, here you are absolutely right. But in Ukraine, almost all Reactors have already exhausted their Service Life and have already been extended several times. In general, if they do not start building new reactors to replace existing ones, then Ukraine will either remain without nuclear power plants at all, or we will get a dozen Chernobyls ...

      Moreover, they cannot delay the construction, they should have started building yesterday.
  8. +1
    23 September 2020 12: 55
    New technologies from the wild: dung and straw.
  9. +2
    23 September 2020 12: 56
    And they will take fuel rods from Westinghouse ?? Oh well........
    1. +1
      23 September 2020 14: 46
      Quote: Alien From
      And they will take fuel rods from Westinghouse ?? Oh well........

  10. +1
    23 September 2020 13: 05
    Ukraine intends to build two new power units of the Khmelnitsky NPP

    kraina, what to BUILD ??? this is a joke?
  11. +1
    23 September 2020 13: 10
    Uhahaha! Wow ... Uhahahaha!
    And the skakuas were generally told that at the moment only Rosatom could build a nuclear power plant for them? The Chinese are building under the leadership of Rosatom, there is a joint venture, the Americans are not building anything, like the French, about when the Vogtl and Olkiluoto nuclear power plants will be completed - there is not even gossip, they have been building for 15 years ... Nobody in the world except Rosatom is building a nuclear power plant does not know how, in the USA the last block was introduced over 30 years ago, in France - over 20, it is just that the specialists are all retired, no one knows how to build them)))
  12. 0
    23 September 2020 13: 12
    As it is interesting to me, there will be two different types of power units at one station.
    Each type requires its own trained and trained personnel.
    Its specificity and its requirements for each type.
    Again the Ukrainians are "reinventing the wheel".
    Only here are the rates from such an invention with a minus sign.
    1. 0
      23 September 2020 13: 28
      Quote: demo
      As it is interesting to me, there will be two different types of power units at one station.
      Each type requires its own trained and trained personnel.
      Its specificity and its requirements for each type.

      * looks thoughtfully towards LNPP with its RBMK and VVER.

      And at the Khmelnytsky NPP there will be one type - VVER-1000. For the Czech company is part of the Russian OMZ group. smile
      1. 0
        23 September 2020 16: 54
        Quote: Alexey RA
        And at the Khmelnytsky NPP there will be one type - VVER-1000. For the Czech company is part of the Russian OMZ group

        Only if you drop the same 2018, then after the noise about Skoda JS, statements went that there are proposals from the Chinese (China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC)) - "formula 1 + 1". the third unit is being completed using the VVER technology, the fourth - “completing the construction of the Khmelnitsky NPP unit No. 4 using the proprietary Hualong One (HPR-1000) technology” - President of Energoatom Yuri Nedashkovsky - “85% of the project is financed from ICBC. Of course, under state guarantees "
        Only now it's not 18 years old ...
  13. +2
    23 September 2020 13: 23
    Hmm, I wonder from what, what kind of shisha, and most importantly who will build it ?! To build a nuclear power plant is not for you to jump on the Maidan and shoot in the Donbass!
  14. 0
    23 September 2020 13: 24
    Within the framework of the project, it was planned to install two nuclear reactors produced by "well-known manufacturers", except for the "aggressor country". It is planned to install Skoda JS as reactors

    From the official site of the OMZ Group - section "Group Enterprises":
    ŠKODA JS as
    One of the largest engineering and manufacturing companies with experience in the construction and service of nuclear power plants operating around the world. During its existence, the company has supplied engineering equipment and services for nuclear power plants, research reactors and spent fuel depots in Central and Eastern Europe, Scandinavia, France, Germany, the USA and the Far East.

    http://www.omz.ru/group-companies/

    Following the "reverse gas" will there be "reverse reactors"? smile
    1. +3
      23 September 2020 13: 51
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Following the "reverse gas" will there be "reverse reactors"?

      Everything is darker. Westinghouse fuel rods and shmalnut will be inserted into the Molot mortar. Did you hear about the "dirty bomb" how they compose? Well, this is it ...
  15. 0
    23 September 2020 13: 35
    Big idea. I just didn't understand:
    Volodymyr Zelenskyy instructed the Cabinet of Ministers to submit to the Verkhovna Rada a bill providing for design and construction

    Why should the Rada consider the bill as much? Don't want to register in the Constitution right away?
  16. +1
    23 September 2020 14: 14
    The Ukrainian authorities have been wanting to build 2 additional power units at the Khmelnytsky nuclear power plant for 20 years. But the question was not resolved when there were funds, and now they are not, from the word at all.
  17. -1
    23 September 2020 14: 35
    Well, at least not state-owned reactors. Otherwise, one Chernobyl in Europe is enough for us.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. +1
    23 September 2020 15: 56
    There is not even a cat and a lamp, but a tiger and a searchlight.
  20. KCA
    -1
    23 September 2020 16: 54
    Two power units are about $ 4 billion, and who will give the loan? Bankrupt Westinghouse, who do not know where to stick?
  21. +1
    23 September 2020 20: 47
    The intentions are wonderful.
    What shishi, it remains to understand ..
    I must say, I lived in UA (good old days) - you watch TV - kiloton intentions!
    Here, bam! Increase in tariffs ...
    Here, bang! Elections. There, chpok! And there was no more work! ...
    And nobody canceled paying for electricity / gas / water ...
    But.
  22. 0
    23 September 2020 21: 11
    In such a state, the IAEA had to close all reactors.
  23. +8
    25 September 2020 00: 12
    Ukraine intends to build two new power units of the Khmelnitsky NPP

    What shisha will be asked to build? Will they be asking for loans again? After all, "credit planners" ...