Antisubmarine Tu-142 of the Northern Fleet will be involved in patrolling the Baltic

52
Antisubmarine Tu-142 of the Northern Fleet will be involved in patrolling the Baltic

Long-range anti-submarine aircraft Tu-142 North fleet will strengthen monitoring of the situation in the Baltic Sea. The decision in principle to use Tu-142 for patrolling the Baltic has already been made. Reported by "News" with reference to sources in the Ministry of Defense.

The Russian military department plans to attract long-range anti-submarine Tu-142 aircraft to patrol the Baltic Sea. This decision is being made against the backdrop of more frequent visits by NATO and US ships to the Baltic. Previously, these aircraft from the Northern Fleet mainly patrolled the Atlantic and the Arctic.



The Ministry of Defense clarifies that the task of the aircraft will not be constant patrolling of this water area, the Tu-142 will be involved only in special cases, when necessary. Test flights of Tu-142 over the Baltic have already taken place, pilots of anti-submarine aviation The Northern Fleet was involved in the Ocean Shield 2020 inter-fleet exercises, which took place in the Baltic Sea in July-August.

It is noted that these aircraft, which have undergone modernization, are equipped with modern reconnaissance equipment and an aiming system.

The Tu-142 long-range anti-submarine aircraft was created on the basis of the Tu-95 strategic bomber. The Tu-142M3 version was put into service in 1985, was serially built until 1994, at present the aircraft are being modernized with the installation of new modern equipment. The maximum flight range exceeds 12 km, the flight speed with a mass of 000 tons at an altitude of 138 meters is up to 7000 km / h. The flight duration is 855 hours. The planes are equipped with means of detecting submarines, as well as missiles, bombs and mines.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    52 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      23 September 2020 10: 59
      Well, right! And training and practice for pilots!
      1. +12
        23 September 2020 11: 11
        Quote: Starover_Z
        Well, right! And training and practice for pilots!

        This decision is not from a good life. The airfield on Kos was crushed, the planes were sawn. There is simply no anti-submarine aviation at the DKBF
        1. +2
          23 September 2020 11: 28
          There is simply no anti-submarine aviation at the DKBF

          hi "She drowned ..." (C) Like many other things. Now "urya-skakuas" of the minuses will stick to you and explain that "with the world on a string ...", ugh, "with outstretched hand" - there are "karasho" and "# vyfsevreti".

          The airfield on Kos was destroyed, the planes were sawn.

          Exactly. Unfortunately. Not otherwise crushed and sawed!
        2. +6
          23 September 2020 11: 38
          You're right. But the old men of the anti-submarine Tu-142 remained ONE ESCADRILIA in the North! This is just out ... - are they going to chase her across all fleets now?
          1. +8
            23 September 2020 12: 07
            Well, what do you want? Why and who needs coverage of the situation in the North Atlantic, the fleet is increasingly coastal. And here is such an optimistic headline, and even in pursuit it will be possible to write how our planes were scared in the Baltic. It is bitter here not even that there was only one squadron left for the anti-submarine Tu, but that they deliberately threw and framed all the submariners who serve as strategists - they are practically not protected by anyone if they leave the base. Surface fleet? Naval aviation? Anti-submarine forces at least OVR? request
            And what to do with that lighted environment? It's easier to arrange this
        3. +2
          23 September 2020 12: 21
          The airfield on the spit could not accept such aircraft (it is for hydro aircraft), but Chkalovsk near Kaliningrad (suburb) 3 years as the runway was modernized for that 160 and that 95 .. you are welcome
          1. +1
            23 September 2020 18: 52
            Yes, I couldn't, but what was the need to disassemble it "into plates" ??
            Again, it could have been modernized.
            About Chkalovsk: I do not envy the residents))) They began to fly a lot and often
        4. +1
          23 September 2020 15: 49
          Quote: The Siberian Barber
          The airfield on Kos was crushed, the planes were sawn. There is simply no anti-submarine aviation at the DKBF

          ========
          No - this is from the word "AT ALL", or from the word"I think so"? Let's define it! Agree - there is a HUGE DIFFERENCE between these two concepts!
          PS No! God forbid! I'm not even going to say that with Anti-submarine defense (including - Aviation) in the Baltic - just so "super-duper"! I didn't even THINK!
          But! Your statement ..... Let's face it .... A little ... NOT THAT !!! request
          1. +1
            23 September 2020 18: 57
            Well, why "not that" ??)
            Do you have information about the presence of anti-submarine aircraft on the BF ??
            1. +1
              23 September 2020 19: 48
              Quote: Siberian barber
              Well, why "not that" ??)
              Do you have information about the presence of anti-submarine aircraft on the BF ??

              =========
              Do you have information that it is NOT there (from the word "in general"?).
              1. +2
                23 September 2020 19: 58
                In my opinion, no
                But now it will be, based on the news under discussion)
    2. +6
      23 September 2020 11: 00
      It is getting hot in the cold Baltic.
      1. +5
        23 September 2020 11: 13
        Yeah, they also began to visit the Barents Sea ...
        1. +1
          23 September 2020 11: 15
          Hello Victor. Hmmm. Near the Crimea, the shaves are swarming.
          1. +2
            23 September 2020 11: 22
            Greetings! hi

            Yes, they decided to tease and probe us ...
            1. +1
              23 September 2020 11: 33
              I don't really like it_ it's crazy money to rattle with pieces of iron, they know how to count money. In a word, if in the first act there is a gun hanging on the wall, then in the second ...
              1. +3
                23 September 2020 11: 46
                And who will like it, it’s not even about the costs, but the fact that the "gun" can shoot ...
    3. +5
      23 September 2020 11: 04
      The Black Sea, the Barents Sea, the Baltic Sea ... south, west, north ... the directions of activation of NATO members are expected ... unlike the times of the USSR, NATO truth is already rattling weapons directly at our borders .... bad ... our troops have been withdrawn from the GDR ... there are no buffer zones.
      1. -1
        23 September 2020 11: 09
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        no buffer zones

        Means? Drink first, Fedya!
        1. +3
          23 September 2020 11: 10
          Means? Drink first, Fedya!

          And what are we drinking for? smile hi
          1. -1
            23 September 2020 17: 07
            "Hit first, Freddie!" there was such an anti-war film.
      2. +5
        23 September 2020 11: 12
        Quote: The same Lech
        .... bad ... our troops were in vain withdrew from the GDR ... there are no buffer zones.


        Yes, this complicates our defense issues ...
        1. 0
          23 September 2020 11: 28
          Yes, drive them like sidor goats! Low spans - let the diapers be changed!
          Pampers can even be purposefully dropped)))
          1. -3
            23 September 2020 19: 35
            Quote: depressant
            Yes, drive them like sidor goats! Low spans - let the diapers be changed!
            Pampers can even be purposefully dropped

      3. +2
        23 September 2020 11: 28
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        in vain our troops were withdrawn from the GDR

        You need to start with the fact that the USSR was destroyed in vain.
        1. +1
          23 September 2020 17: 08
          Quote: Piramidon
          The USSR was destroyed in vain

          To be more precise, this is not a "collapse", but a counter-revolution with dire consequences for the Soviet people and the peoples of the whole world.
    4. +2
      23 September 2020 11: 11
      The maximum flight range exceeds 12 km, the flight speed with a mass of 000 tons at an altitude of 138 meters is up to 7000 km / h. The flight duration is 855 hours. The planes are equipped with means of detecting submarines, as well as missiles, bombs and mines.


      This is not a bad answer to their visit to our shores ...
      1. +7
        23 September 2020 11: 19
        It's a pity that only remnants of the once powerful MA SF now remain, if I'm not mistaken, SF tu142 only in Kipelovo and the numerical strength there is relatively small, and in addition to the Baltic, they also have areas for patrolling. Of course, I do not pretend to be the ultimate truth, but we used to fly regularly from Soltsy to patrol on Tu22-pair + reserve board, in my opinion it is much cheaper than driving such colossus for patrol, even if it is better to work for their intended purpose, "pick out" the submarine our friends from NATa
        1. +1
          23 September 2020 11: 23
          This is true, we have a lot to restore and build up, otherwise ...
        2. -1
          23 September 2020 11: 30
          Quote: Rushnairfors
          if I'm not mistaken, SF tu142 only in Kipelovo and remained

          They were in the Northern Fleet and were only in Kipelovo. But there was a division, and a squadron remained.
          1. 0
            23 September 2020 17: 16
            Yeah, thanks for the clarification, but weren't they in Lakhta? Or have the 22s always been there? I am just relatively young, and I do not know all the airfields of the great and mighty, mainly from the old wars
            1. -2
              23 September 2020 18: 37
              Quote: Rushnairfors
              and in Lakhta weren't they?

              No, it was not. On the Northern Fleet, they were based in Kipelovo 35th PLAD (now the 73rd PLAD is left of it), at the Pacific Fleet 310th PLAD in Khorol, and later in Kamenny Brook. They did not even use Lakhta in the Northern Fleet as a jump airfield. Only Olenya and Severomorsk-1 hi
      2. +1
        23 September 2020 11: 26
        Quote: cniza
        Flight duration - 9 hours

        A slight inaccuracy in the article, the flight duration of the Tu-142 is almost twice as long, 9 * hours is the time of patrolling.
        1. +1
          23 September 2020 11: 44
          Probably, it is correct that real performance characteristics are not laid out, but on the other hand, this is no longer a secret ...
          1. +1
            23 September 2020 11: 49
            Quote: cniza
            on the other hand, this is no longer a secret ...

            Tu-142 was created on the basis of Tu-95RTs, what secrets can there be, all performance characteristics are well known.
            1. -2
              23 September 2020 18: 53
              Quote: bober1982
              Tu-142 was created on the basis of Tu-95RTs, what secrets could there be

              Tu-95RTs and Tu-142 are quite different machines. Various not only in "stuffing", but even in the glider.
              1. 0
                23 September 2020 21: 17
                Quote: Piramidon
                Tu-95RTs and Tu-142 are quite different machines.

                I don’t claim that the planes are the same, one of them was made on the basis of the other.
    5. +6
      23 September 2020 11: 15
      question - why? the gulf of Finland is 80 km wide ... and the whole sea is a puddle. il38 is enough. and another question, what did they take under control of the waters in the North? I think NATO members are quietly roaming there. tired of showy booths
      1. -1
        23 September 2020 11: 55
        Quote: Andy
        question - why?

        Not from a good life. One squadron Tu-142, available, needs to cover both the North and the Baltic.
    6. 0
      23 September 2020 11: 22
      I wonder how much Tu-142 is left in the aviation of the fleet?
    7. +1
      23 September 2020 11: 23
      Tu-142 in the Baltic - it would be funny if it were not so sad. They were created to work in the Indian Ocean. By the way, it is interesting how the capabilities of the search systems and equipment of the complex have changed since the 1970s. We must make our way to the surrounded Kaliningrad. This will remove many problems. (A problem is a problem that has no solution.)
    8. -1
      23 September 2020 11: 35
      Who is Izvestiya. A source of the Ministry of Defense over a cup of tea in the evening, my wife and whether I will call the news, and whether I will tell the plans of MO.Durdom Chamomile. hi : drinks .:
    9. +2
      23 September 2020 12: 02
      I would also envisage a Be-12 in an anti-submarine version for the Baltic. Dalniks are far away, but these can resolve issues more quickly.
      1. -2
        23 September 2020 12: 11
        Quote: Tektor
        I would envisage a Be-12 for the Baltic

        Are they still there?
    10. 0
      23 September 2020 12: 47
      Does the Baltic Fleet itself lack aircraft for patrolling?
    11. +5
      23 September 2020 13: 03
      Stupid note!
      Now, if the range is 12000 km, then why is the duration 9 hours?
      How is patrolling? Aerial reconnaissance of ships at sea with radar and
      visually? Or search for submarines at the turn or in a given area? Rather
      everything is all chatter and demo flights will be performed
      "to spite the enemies." Will knock out the resource from the remnants of the submarine. Yearning...
      1. -2
        23 September 2020 19: 24
        Quote: Bez 310
        How is patrolling? Aerial reconnaissance of ships at sea with radar and
        visually?

        Please note that this is an ANTI-WATER aircraft. One of the methods for detecting a submarine is dropping buoys in the area of ​​its intended location, followed by patrolling this area and receiving a signal from them.
        1. +1
          23 September 2020 22: 22
          Quote: Piramidon
          it is an ANTI-WATER aircraft.

          Seriously?
          I know a little how to use such a plane,
          so do not strain, and do not distort our
          favorite expression: "staging and controlling
          buoy fields ".
    12. 0
      24 September 2020 21: 07
      Tu-142 should be bought from the Indians.
    13. -1
      24 September 2020 21: 14
      Got badly in partners --- B52 over Ukraine-today Osprey with the marines-Baltic is crammed by NATO as well as the Black Sea-about the Quiet and there is nothing to say-you won't get out at all-at the head base of the Northern Fleet Siful grazes, Georgia under the Americans-Afghan too-can only North Arctic not at gunpoint - if obamobusheklinton mafia takes power - ass will
    14. -1
      24 September 2020 21: 18
      In my opinion, Russia was handed over with giblets, one hope for the military, and this is again a terrible war
    15. 0
      25 September 2020 00: 02
      Quote: Charik
      In my opinion, Russia was handed over with giblets, one hope for the military, and this is again a terrible war

      We passed in the 90s, now there is hope that we will break through.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"