Former world leaders lobby for the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty

56 former government leaders have signed an open letter addressing their own governments. They ask current world leaders to accept the Nuclear Ban Treaty. weaponsconcluded at the UN three years ago.

About this newspaper New York Times.

For the document to come into force, only six ratifications out of 50 required are lacking.

The open letter contains the names of 56 former prime ministers, presidents, foreign ministers and defense ministers from 20 NATO countries, as well as from Japan and South Korea. It was unveiled on the eve of the 75th anniversary of the United Nations at the annual General Assembly.

The letter notes that it is urgent to accept the treaty, as the risks of using nuclear weapons as a result of an accident, miscalculation or deliberately have increased significantly in recent years.

Two of the signatories are former NATO secretaries general - Javier Solana from Spain and Willie Claas from Belgium. Ex-Secretary General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon also signed the document.

All signers of this letter are from countries that refused to join the treaty.

In 2017, when the UN was signing an agreement, all nine officially recognized nuclear powers, including Russia, boycotted it.

Yesterday, the US President's special envoy for arms control Marshall Billingsley told the newspaper Kommersantthat Russia should approve the American terms of the extension of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). And we must hurry, because after Trump's re-election, this will no longer work.

As the RIA NewsIn response, Anton Morozov, a member of the Russian State Duma Committee on International Affairs, noted that it is necessary to develop a treaty base on the limitation of nuclear weapons, but the language of ultimatums is unacceptable.

Comments

[nnm]

Yesterday, the US President's special envoy for arms control Marshall Billingsley told the Kommersant newspaper that Russia should approve American terms for the extension of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty

So something is definitely wrong with these proposals ...

[Thrall]

Today is just the third anniversary of the opening for signing of this stillborn treaty banning nuclear weapons. That's all.

[Temples]

It is also necessary to sign a treaty banning meat, bread and water.
Deny the air!
Sign a treaty banning the sun and moon.

Signers and callers are most likely senile.

[Tatyana]

Quote: Temples

Signers and callers are most likely senile.

Well, why is it necessary to immediately "senile"? These three are cunning provocateurs who are seeking another unilateral disarmament from Russia in favor of the United States.
Under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, this unilateral nuclear disarmament of the USSR / RF was quite a success for the United States! Why don't the Americans fool the Russian Federation in this matter again and on the same scale?
It is clear that everything is being done at the suggestion of the US State Department.

In addition, now these signatories, at the suggestion of the United States, will receive the Nobel Peace Prizes, if the nuclear disarmament of Russia works for the United States for the second time! So they are trying!

[Vladimir Mashkov]

Everything seems to be fine and wonderful: world leaders are calling for a ban on nuclear weapons ... A short phrase spoils EVERYTHING and nullifies everything: on American terms. Is there anyone in the world who believes in the wonderfulness of the United States? It is not hard to guess what this "prohibition" will lead to!

[Temples]

Quote: Tatiana

Under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, this is unilateral nuclear disarmament of the USSR / RF

What do you have in mind?
Can you tell us more about unilateral disarmament?

[zadorin1974]

Good time Vladimir.Tatiana wrote correctly about unilateral disarmament. Just did not give examples-Inclusion of the Oka complex in the disarmament treaty, the Nunn-Lugar Agreement. The so-called HEU-LEU deal. Is that so, do you need to use a quick reference or find it yourself? To the humpbacked stake in the grave - since 1988, the program for access to the utilization complex. The American inspection at the Votkinsk plant compared with it, the nursery-garden Solnyshko.

[Grim Reaper]

Quote: Temples

Quote: Tatiana

Under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, this is unilateral nuclear disarmament of the USSR / RF

What do you have in mind?
Can you tell us more about unilateral disarmament?

Slogans, just slogans. The girl can. Let him "pomite" Then kiss her and drag her to the crib. TAN, do not be offended, I love you very much.

[Boris ⁣ Shaver]

Quote: Temples

Can you tell us more about unilateral disarmament?

For example, under the INF Treaty, the CSTO has no more intermediate and shorter-range ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles. And NATO has a dime a dozen.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Tatiana

these are cunning provocateurs who seek another unilateral disarmament from Russia in favor of the United States.

Chemical weapons have already been "banned". We destroyed, the OPCW confirmed. And now, it turns out, America, which has preserved its chemical arsenals, is white and fluffy, and we poison the whole world with the "Novice". And here it will be the same.

Quote: Tatiana

Under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, this unilateral nuclear disarmament of the USSR / RF was quite a success for the United States! Why don't the Americans fool the Russian Federation in this matter again and on the same scale?

It will not work, unfortunately for them ... We have grown wiser and more, as in the 90s, for some reason we do not believe that kind America will come, give money and other goodies, teach us how to live. Poland believes, the Czech Republic believes, the Baltic states believe, but we do not. Learned ... As soon as Russia cuts the last missile into scrap metal, NATO troops will cross the border on the same day.

[Tatyana]

Quote: Zoldat_A

As soon as Russia cuts the last missile into scrap metal, NATO troops will cross the border on the same day.

I absolutely agree with you that it will be so! There can be no even any doubt about it!

[Motorist]

Quote: Tatiana

Quote: Zoldat_A

As soon as Russia cuts the last missile into scrap metal, NATO troops will cross the border on the same day.

I absolutely agree with you that it will be so! There can be no even any doubt about it!

Will not be:

Putin and Obama agree on nuclear disarmament. All warheads were detonated in space. A week later, a call to the Kremlin: - Hello Vova, I still have 7 missiles left here, so Russia is now a colony of the United States ... Well, Putin is thinking, scratching his turnip. Suddenly, the Minister of Defense runs into the office "Vladimir Vladimirovich, trouble! Near Saratov, one drunken lieutenant forgot to disarm the whole base, about 40 Topol! What to do ?! Putin:" Well, firstly not a lieutenant, but a lieutenant general, and secondly when Russia drinks it is invincible! (Folk art)

[Shuttle]

Quote: Tatiana

Quote: Temples

Signers and callers are most likely senile.

Well, why is it necessary to immediately "senile"? These three are cunning provocateurs who are seeking another unilateral disarmament from Russia in favor of the United States.
Under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, this unilateral nuclear disarmament of the USSR / RF was quite a success for the United States! Why don't the Americans fool the Russian Federation in this matter again and on the same scale?
It is clear that everything is being done at the suggestion of the US State Department.

In addition, now these signatories, at the suggestion of the United States, will receive the Nobel Peace Prizes, if the nuclear disarmament of Russia works for the United States for the second time! So they are trying!

Is not a fact. Perhaps Trump really needs a signed treaty right before the election. But who said that he would or at least wants to observe it?

[Alf]

Quote: Shuttle

... Perhaps Trump really needs a signed treaty right before the election. But who said that he would or at least wants to observe it?

Trump will sign it at a breakneck pace. And then he will lower his eyes and say the Senate has not ratified ..

[Shuttle]

Quote: Alf

Quote: Shuttle

... Perhaps Trump really needs a signed treaty right before the election. But who said that he would or at least wants to observe it?

Trump will sign it at a breakneck pace. And then he will lower his eyes and say the Senate has not ratified ..

That is what I meant.

[Tatyana]

Yes, the United States can not believe a penny !!!
And Israel is hiding from everyone that it is a nuclear power!
And only the Zionists in the United States and Israel will benefit from such a unilateral nuclear disarmament treaty!
China will not agree to this disarmament either.

[Hunter 2]

I completely agree with you! Chemical weapons were banned, Russia liquidated its arsenals ... The mattress covers were all sent for storage!
In the modern reality of Russia without nuclear weapons, it is simply not possible to survive. Throughout history - We have fought enough on our territory, Everything - Enough!

[neri73-r]

Quote: Hunter 2

I completely agree with you! Chemical weapons were banned, Russia liquidated its arsenals ... The mattress covers were all sent for storage!
In the modern reality of Russia without nuclear weapons, it is simply not possible to survive. Throughout history - We have fought enough on our territory, Everything - Enough!

I agree that the Anglo-Saxons should have long known the horrors of war on their territory. A real war of destruction.

[Temples]

Quote: Tatiana

And Israel is hiding from everyone that it is a nuclear power!

Israel is a power!

Is Pakistan also a power?

[English tarantas]

We have fought enough on our territory, that's it - that's enough!

By the way, they fought a lot on foreign lands, too, no more is needed.

[halpat]

Quote: Tatiana

Yes, the United States can not believe a penny !!!
And Israel is hiding from everyone that it is a nuclear power!
And only the Zionists in the United States and Israel will benefit from such a unilateral nuclear disarmament treaty!
China will not agree to this disarmament either.

Israel is NOT a nuclear power. Israel is a nuclear kibbutz :) rather.

[Grim Reaper]

Quote: Tatiana

Yes, the United States can not believe a penny !!!
And Israel is hiding from everyone that it is a nuclear power!
And only the Zionists in the United States and Israel will benefit from such a unilateral nuclear disarmament treaty!
China will not agree to this disarmament either.

No one with nuclear weapons will go. For a club, it is a club in Africa too.

[antivirus]

za, with the addition of a clause on the prohibition of aircraft carriers over 45 thousand tons, as harmful to whales and killer whales

[Senka naughty]

Maybe you also need the keys to the apartment where the money is?

[HUMANOID]

The keys to the apartment are not relevant, you need to say "Can I give you the keys to the nuclear suitcase?

[Grim Reaper]

Quote: HUMANOID

The keys to the apartment are not relevant, you need to say "Can I give you the keys to the nuclear suitcase?

I would prefer money .....

[Civil]

The capitalist will never give up the means of intimidation) like the dictator, in this they are twin brothers

[SRC P-15]

Former world leaders lobby for the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty

Why didn't you care about this when you were in power?

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: СРЦ П-15

Why didn't you care about this when you were in power?

And they need only Russia, China and the DPRK to give up nuclear weapons.
So that then, completely not worrying about anything, voluptuously tear them apart.

[SRC P-15]

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

And they need only Russia, China and the DPRK to give up nuclear weapons.
So that then, completely not worrying about anything, voluptuously tear them apart.

Then let firearms, along with cold ones, be prohibited! Or better yet: sign a treaty banning all wars! And the United States chuckles quietly on the sidelines.

[svp67]

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

And they need only Russia, China and the DPRK to give up nuclear weapons.

Now it is enough for them to remove Russia from the list of countries that own nuclear weapons, then carry out another "color revolution" in it and everything ... the rest will fall under them anyway

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich

Quote: СРЦ П-15

Why didn't you care about this when you were in power?

And they need only Russia, China and the DPRK to give up nuclear weapons.
So that then, completely not worrying about anything, voluptuously tear them apart.

First of all, America must abandon the idea of ​​its exclusiveness, the role of the world hegemon, and the idea of ​​the unipolarity of the world, which is absolutely unacceptable for America for a number of mental reasons. And if America has such an outlook on the world, it is quite natural for them that only one power, America, has the right to possess the most powerful nuclear weapon today. But they just do not understand that the word "never" does not work like that.

[zadorin1974]

As far as I understand, they couldn't do without Humpback? Sell the country's defense for trinkets for his wife !!!! When will this bastard be hanged by the legs at the mausoleum?

[Grim Reaper]

Quote: zadorin1974

As far as I understand, they couldn't do without Humpback? Sell the country's defense for trinkets for his wife !!!! When will this bastard be hanged by the legs at the mausoleum?

Yes, take it easy. More than 30 years have passed. All "tagged" is to blame ... you need to remind YOU how many years have passed since the end of the Second World War and
Gagarin's flight? ”And after all, Stalin, so beloved by you, and Khrushchev, so hated by you, were in power.

[Grim Reaper]

Oh, tell me an unknown backing track, where am I wrong? Let's get together in a debate, we will argue, we will clean each other's faces. Come out of the gloom. Listen?

[zadorin1974]

I, Alexey, did not understand your tirade, from the word at all. I remembered somewhere about Stalin or wrote about Khrushchev? About Gorbach I will really always say that he is an enemy and a traitor. Moreover, not the social system, but the state. This dog has cut so much blood it has more than one million.

[Grim Reaper]

When did the "era of Gorbachev end?" For almost 30 years. AND???? Yes, life has become better than in the 90s. Can not argue. Those who are not lazy can afford a Mercedes and a hundred varieties of sausages. Only now we are turning into a society of consumers ... Freeloaders.
From SW. Alexey.

[zadorin1974]

Yes, I do not argue about the system. But the collapse of the Country has poured into rivers of blood. This animal is also promoting itself around the world. That's what the problem is for me. There is such a concept in history, a dance on bones. And at the expense of consumers and freeloaders, I would call KHALYAVSCHIKOV: For myself, I will say this - the more my friends (there are several organisms) whine that they have little flesh, the worse they work, but everyone around them owes them more and more.

[Vol4ara]

Quote: SRC P-15

Former world leaders lobby for the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty

Why didn't you care about this when you were in power?

Who am I?

[SRC P-15]

Quote: Vol4ara

Who am I?

Well, if you are a former world leader, then yes!
Does the arrow in my comment point to yours?

[Trapp1st]

The letter notes that it is urgent to accept the contract

In our time, to negotiate with someone, just dirty paper. More rockets, different and scary!

[rocket757]

Yesterday, the US President's special envoy for arms control Marshall Billingsley told the Kommersant newspaper that Russia should

So it's cool, Russia again "should" to them ..... annoying like a fly, big, striped, harmful!

[tralflot1832]

Sorry, it's not flies, it's striped oso. But it's still rummaging around in memory!

[Mountain shooter]

Translating into an understandable language, there is no way to get you while you have a strategic nuclear weapons ... you should have "knocked out" this trump card, and then we will "get you", we will pile up together, and ...

[apro]

Today, yaba is the only guarantee against aggression ... and disarming is simply giving up.

[Livonetc]

First, let them ban global terrorism from the United States, all sorts of Anglo-Skaxes and those who favor them.
As a result, it will be possible to consider the issue of banning nuclear weapons.
In the meantime, there is only one remedy for these vile bugs.
Nuclear bug swatter.

[Ded_Mazay]

What a "great" idea!
Let's abandon nuclear weapons, and return to the good old days of the two world wars, when it was customary to wet each other with tanks, machine guns, buckshot and carpet bombing.
They say the truth - "the road to hell is paved with good intentions." Especially when these "good" intentions come from someone from NATO.

[set of sets]

Banning nuclear weapons with 100% probability will provoke a third world war.

[Ded_Mazay]

Quote: set of sets

with 100% probability will provoke the third world

No, from 146%. What they are most likely to strive for.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: set of sets

Banning nuclear weapons with 100% probability will provoke a third world war.

Very good thought!
The point is that the West is already pregnant with TMV. For this is the only way out of the huge bubble inflated by the financial crowd of the Stars and Stripes. But here's the problem: we are ready to nullify the TNW + SNW for this whole gang. And this is openly declared by the President and enshrined in the principles of the use of nuclear weapons. Therefore, the West will definitely have a miscarriage, or if they still jerk out of stupidity, we will have them abortion quickly.
So the liberoids are trying to take away the scalpel from us under a plausible pretext.
The "noble" cover is also cleverly invented. But they are not original.
Prior to that, Babama's black man, counting on the supposedly global Yankee missile defense, tried to reduce our ICBMs to 500 units. Well, after the first disarming strike, to deal with the remaining strategic nuclear weapons of Russia.
Now they are trying to "disarm" from the other side.
About one thing, they probably regret that there is no Gorby at the helm, but there is Putin, who stood like a bone in their throat ...

[1536]

And then we will be accused of concluding a "pact with Trump", which influenced the fate of the world and humanity as a whole, and not for the better. In the next 10-20 years, no agreements on the reduction of any weapons can be concluded with the United States.
And these "veterans", God forgive me, would be better off tackling neo-fascism, chauvinism and racism in different countries, where someone else hears their voice.

[rotmistr60]

Who, if not the former leaders of the countries, should know that any agreement can be terminated at the request of one of the parties at any time. An example of this is the United States unilaterally withdrawn from a number of treaties. A complete renunciation of nuclear weapons is a utopia today. The Americans will never give up the "nuclear baton", and we will never give up the deterrent factor of nuclear weapons.

[Pilat2009]

Quote: rotmistr60

Who, if not the former leaders of the countries, should know that any agreement can be terminated at the request of one of the parties at any time. An example of this is the United States unilaterally withdrawn from a number of treaties. A complete renunciation of nuclear weapons is a utopia today. The Americans will never give up the "nuclear baton", and we will never give up the deterrent factor of nuclear weapons.

India is afraid of China, Israel is Arabs and Iran, China is the Americans, we are the Chinese and NATO, Pakistan India is a vicious circle. They can't get the end of nuclear research from Iran.

[Mavrikiy]

All signers of this letter are from countries that refused to join the treaty.

Ali's ass is hot, or old age insanity among "former state leaders."

Marshall Billingsley said Russia must approve American terms for the extension of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START)

"The United States, speaking about reducing the number and quality of nuclear warheads, is ready to reduce their number to the level of China?"
According to Senator Vladimir Dzhabarov, Billingsley's statement about the United States' readiness to negotiate with Russia on disarmament may be dictated by internal interests.

It still burns ...

[silverwolf88]

The presence of nuclear weapons is a good deterrent for any adversary (North Korea is a good example of this ... and Libya / Iraq / Syria ... and so on is an example of the opposite) Nuclear weapons are a guarantee of sovereign politics and freedom in the highest understanding of international relations ...
Treaties are possible in the legal field ... but it is not ... the United States and its European allies ... demonstrate a complete disregard for the sovereignty of other countries ... their interests ... any opinions differing from them ... and in this context rejection of nuclear weapons and agreements with those who are initially unable to negotiate is the way to nowhere ...

[Daniil Konovalenko]

Counter offer, conclude a treaty banning capitalism and imperialism.

[Polymer]

Great offer!
Only "prohibit capitalism and imperialism" is too vague. I would suggest prohibiting private ownership of the means of production - that will be enough.

[rocket757]

The former love to play different games !!! We have heard, we have seen this more than once!
Every time I want to ask - Yes, shozh you did something when you were not yet still ???

[tralflot1832]

I fully support this proposal. The Americans are reducing their strategic nuclear forces to the level of China. And we are not going to put special ammunition on the Petrel.

[sergo1914]

And Dmitry Anatolyevich signed?

[sergo1914]

Quote: sergo1914

And Dmitry Anatolyevich signed?

Minus? Offended or what?

[Alien From]

They powder their brains before the UN General Assembly, no more ...

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

The letter notes that it is urgent to accept the treaty, as the risks of using nuclear weapons as a result of an accident, miscalculation or deliberately have increased significantly in recent years.

And the fact that in case of abandonment of nuclear weapons, the third world becomes inevitable - this does not bother them? Honestly, it's hard for me to understand how seemingly intelligent people can carry such nonsense

[Pacifist]

As long as the planet has such "lights" as the United States, only the mentally retarded will refuse nuclear weapons. And on the topic of INF Treaty ... the United States is not negotiable, history has proven. So it's more expensive to agree with their interpretation. You can't negotiate with them at all, they always spit on contracts as soon as they see that they no longer need them. So we don't need it now either. Do you want to renew? Well, yourself .. now all by ourselves ... everything suits us.

[Per se.]

Quote: Pacifist

only the mentally retarded will refuse nuclear weapons

The Yeltsin Center was not built by the mentally retarded, although Boris Nikolayevich, for a friend of Bill and the United States, did a lot of things unilaterally from Russia. It is somehow alarming here, but in general our current bourgeoisie, including renegades, former members of the CPSU who surrendered socialism and the USSR, would actually use nuclear weapons if they are all more in the West now? Surrender immediately - the people will not understand, in the name of peace, humanism, tolerance and their billions in other people's banks, they puff their cheeks for decency, and who knows, especially with an ultimatum on their welfare ...

[Lesorub]

In 2017, when the UN was signing an agreement, all nine officially recognized nuclear powers, including Russia, boycotted it.

Conclusion: "non-nuclear" powers want - to prohibit "nuclear" to have such weapons - naive! And the attempts of the United States with the START Treaty are not promising (and suspicious).

[Last centurion]

Well, of course, Japo5ii's dream is that the Russian Federation does not have nuclear weapons and they can attack the north. BUT not in this universe ...

[iouris]

And the surplus population will be destroyed by processing into highly enriched soil for flowers.

[Vladimir61]

Well, yes, some peacekeepers! Those who "eyes open" when they are already former.

Yesterday, the US President's special envoy for arms control Marshall Billingsley told the Kommersant newspaper that Russia must approve the American terms for the extension of the Treaty on the reduction of strategic offensive arms (START).

First of all, because of such a decades-long dictatorship of the United States and its satellite NATO, Russia will not sign this document. It's like a pack of dogs surrounded you and demands to throw the pitchfork, otherwise you are afraid to get back.

[jovanni]

Well, to hell. If we did not have this arsenal, which was created at the cost of the incredible efforts of our people, they would have torn us to shreds. There are too many enemies and envious people. So they wander along the borders, grinning with their teeth. Jackals ...

[Aaleks1974]

If it is also banned, like chemical weapons, when all countries except the United States have destroyed their weapons, and the Americans will drag out for another 50 years, then it’s better not! It's better not to sit down at the negotiating table with such cheaters!

[Rokambol]

Quote: Aaleks1974

If you also prohibit

Now we can’t give up nuclear weapons. The rejection of nuclear weapons will cause aggression from NATO and the EU against us.

[English tarantas]

Yeah, of course, no nuclear power will do such a stupid thing in the near future, it's like throwing out injuries in a fight in a night alley because a gopnik only has brass knuckles.
And what about the demands to accept some treaties concerning nuclear weapons, it is even dumber, but what will you do, use nuclear weapons?

[rocket757]

Wherever you throw, everywhere a wedge!
At a given moment in time, in this military-political situation, in the absence of an opportunity to protect himself from the "collision" of the strongest, militarily, the most aggressive power, this is the kyrdik.
Everyone defends themselves ASAP!

[APASUS]

The United States is currently destroying the existing system of treaties and arms control, and the lobbying of the former world leaders, the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons looks somewhat faked. The world is on the verge of a new arms race for some reason, and there is a specific initiator to cover it?

[evgen1221]

And nothing that even a dirty one on his knee, the only effective way to protect the country from the encroachments of the United States of light, exclusively peaceful elves. The prohibition case is, in principle, of course useful if all the bases around the world are taken from the states and only the coastal fleet is left. Well, leave a few missiles to shoot down UFOs or asteroids, it's fantastic. And in the reality of the mental hospital of the planet Garbage, this will be an invitation and permission for the states and their mongrels to redistribute the world. Is it necessary for potential victims?

[zwlad]

Billingsley told the Kommersant newspaper that Russia should approve the American terms of the extension of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). And we must hurry, because after Trump's re-election, this will no longer work.

Aha! Schazzz! Russia owes you nothing. You are a little wrong with the address.

[yfast]

Better to prohibit NATO countries from having nuclear weapons. They are already strong. If you want to have a nuclear one, leave the block and have it.

[avdkrd]

this treaty is completely unnecessary for Russia, which is dozens of times inferior to NATO in conventional armaments, besides, treaties with the United States are not worth the paper on which they are written. It would not hurt to remind the states of the chemical weapons treaty, which they have not destroyed, not even to remind them, but to withdraw from it, since one of the parties does not comply with it. Any reduction of nuclear weapons at the current moment, not only will not add security, but on the contrary, will bring the third world war closer. In the event of aggression by NATO, Russia should have the ability to drive all members of the bloc into the stone age. After the deployment of missile defense and reduction to the current values, we are already by a thread. The number of strategic carriers is already critical and they are vulnerable. It is likely that the supporters of the new world order will be satisfied with the damage that Russia can inflict in response to a preemptive strike. No treaties, nuclear weapons are the only guarantor of peace.

[Rokambol]

Quote: avdkrd

remind the states about the treaty on chemical weapons, which they never destroyed, not even remind them, but withdraw from it, since one of the parties does not comply with it.

We no longer have chemical weapons.

Quote: avdkrd

Nuclear weapons are the only guarantor of peace.

Quite right. Due to the presence of nuclear weapons in our country, the Third World War is not expected.

[lvov_aleksey]

I thought I had forgotten how to laugh, but this
"All signers of this letter are from countries that have refused to join the treaty."
ps didn't want to, but now what? ...))))))))))))))))))))))

[Rokambol]

Quote: lvov_aleksey

they didn't want to, but now what?

And now they have become exes and decided to remind about themselves

[Grim Reaper]

Quote: Vol4ara

Quote: SRC P-15

Former world leaders lobby for the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty

Why didn't you care about this when you were in power?

Who am I?

+++> ++++++++++++++++++ >>> + >>>>>>>> ++++++